Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presentation Objectives: The Economics, Performance, and Sustainability of Internally Cured Concrete, Part 3
Presentation Objectives: The Economics, Performance, and Sustainability of Internally Cured Concrete, Part 3
ACI Member Benjamin E. Byard is a faculty member at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. He received his BS and MS degrees from Tennessee Technological University and his PhD from Auburn University. His research interests include the earlyage behavior of concrete structures, lightweight concrete, early-age stress development modeling, and nondestructive testing. He is an associate member of ACI Committees 231, Properties of Concrete at Early Ages and 213, Lightweight Aggregate and Concrete.
EarlyAgeAutogenousEffectsin InternallyCuredConcreteandMortar
TheEconomics,Performance,andSustainability ofInternallyCuredConcrete PresentedBy:BenjaminE.Byard
CoAuthors:AntonK.SchindlerandRobertW.Barnes
PresentationObjectives
1. EvaluatetheeffectofICandw/conthe developmentofstress andinternalrelative humidity. 2. EvaluatetheeffectofICandw/con autogenousshrinkagedevelopment in concrete andmortar.
Outline
StressDevelopmentMechanisms TestingEquipment ExperimentalWork Results Conclusions
StressDevelopmentMechanisms
WhyDoesConcreteCrack?
12/20/2012
StressDevelopmentMechanisms
EarlyAgeVolumeChangeOccursBecause
Thermaleffects
Temperaturechangesduetohydration Coefficientofthermalexpansion
Cement
SelfDesiccation
t=0,watermeetscement
Water
Decreaseofinternalrelativehumidity
Dryingduetoatmosphericconditions Selfdesiccation(autogenousshrinkage)
Auburn University
12
SelfDesiccation
t=initialset,hydrationproductsformskeleton Decreaseinvolumeduetochemicalshrinkage Cement Hydration Products Additional decreasein absolute volumedue tocapillary stresses Desiccating capillary pores
SelfDesiccation
t=afterset,hydrationcontinuesandcementconsumescapillary porewaterandinducecapillarystresses
13
14
SelfDesiccation?
InternalCuringMechanisms
WhyUseLightweightAggregate?
Whenbatchedintheprewetted state,LWA hasinternalwaterstoredinitspores
Thiswaterpromoteshydration internal curing
12/20/2012
Outline
StressDevelopmentMechanisms
TestEquipment:StressDevelopment
RigidCrackingFrame
TestingEquipment
ExperimentalWork Results Conclusions
TOP FORMWORK CONCRETE
BOTTOM FORMWORK
COPPERCOOLING PIPES
TestEquipment:StressDevelopment
RigidCrackingFrames
TestingEquipment:FreeShrinkage
FreeShrinkageFrame
Concrete specimen Plastic sheeting Copper tubing Movable steel end plate
Anchorage disk
Insulation Formwork
PlanView
TestingEquipment:FreeShrinkage
FreeShrinkageFrame
TestingEquipment:Autogenous Strain
Autogenousstrainofmortarwasmeasuredby thecorrugatedtubemethod(ASTMC169809)
12/20/2012
Outline
StressDevelopmentMechanisms TestingEquipment
ExperimentalWork
Eachconcretemixturewastested:
RestrainedStressDevelopment Isothermal(73)
RigidCrackingFrame
ExperimentalWork
Results Conclusions
FreeShrinkage Isothermal(73F)
Concrete:FreeShrinkageFrame Mortar:CorrugatedTubeMethod SievedMortar
InternalRelativeHumidity Isothermal(73)
EmbeddedRHSensors
MechanicalProperties
MatchedCuredtoModeledTemperatureProfile
ExperimentalWork
Mixturestested:
Controlmixtures
w/c=0.42,0.36,and0.30 Slump:3to5in. AirContent:4.5to6.5% Aggregates:siliceousrivergravelandnaturalsand
MixtureProportions
Item WaterContent (lb/yd3) CementContent (lb/yd3) SSDNormalweight CoarseAggregate(lb/yd3) SSDNormalweightFineAggregate(lb/yd3) SDShaleLightweightFineAggregate(lb/yd3) SDClayLightweightMaximizer(lb/yd3) SDSlateLightweightFineAggregate(lb/yd3) TargetTotalAirContent (%) Watercement ratio(w/c) InternalCuringWater(lb/yd3) 0.42RG 260 620 1,761 1,210 0 0 0 5.5 0.42 0 0.42ShaleIC 0.42ClayIC 0.42SlateIC 260 620 1,761 878 230 0 0 5.5 0.42 36 260 620 1,761 878 0 230 0 5.5 0.42 33 260 620 1,761 818 0 0 276 5.5 0.42 22
Internalcuringmixtures
Samew/c,slump,aircontent,andnormalweightaggregates Achieveanequilibriumdensitygreaterthan135pcf UseBentz methodforlightweightaggregateproportioning
MixtureProportions
Item WaterContent (lb/yd3) CementContent (lb/yd3) No.67RiverGravel(SSD)(lb/yd3) TXIShaleFineAggregate(SD)(lb/yd3) NaturalSand(SSD)(lb/yd3) TargetAir(%) w/cm InternalCuringWater(lb/yd3) 0.36 238 677 1761 0 1210 5.5 0.36 0 0.36ICM 0.36ICH 238 677 1761 184 956 5.5 0.36 31 238 677 1761 275 823 5.5 0.36 46 0.30 218 738 1761 0 1210 5.5 0.3 0 0.30ICM 0.30ICH 218 738 1761 188 940 5.5 0.3 32 218 738 1761 253 867 5.5 0.3 42
Outline
StressDevelopmentMechanisms TestingEquipment ExperimentalWork
Results
Conclusions
12/20/2012
Autogenous Strain:Concretevs.Mortar
50
Free Shrinkage Strain ()
Results
Autogenous Strain:w/c=0.42
100 50 0
Autogenious Strain()
Results
0.42 Concrete 0.36 Concrete 0.30 Concrete 0.42 Mortar 0.36 Mortar 0.30 Mortar
Autogenous Strain:w/c=0.36
100 50
Autogenous Strain()
Results
Autogenous Strain:w/c=0.30
100 50 0.36 0.36ICM 0.36ICH 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.30ICM 0.30ICH 0.30
Results
0
Autogenious Strain()
400 0 28 MorterAge(days) 56
Autogenous Strain:w/c=0.30
100 50
Autogenous Strain()
Results
IsothermalStressDevelopment:w/c=0.42
300 0.30
Concrete Stress (psi)
Results
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 28 MorterAge(days) 56 0.30ICM 0.30ICH
-0.4
24
72
96
250
Tension
2.1 1.8
12/20/2012
IsothermalStressDevelopment:w/c=0.36
300 250
Concrete Stress (psi)
Results
IsothermalStressDevelopment:w/c=0.30
300 250
Concrete Stress (MPa) Concrete Stress (psi)
Results
2.1
Tension
2.1
Tension
-0.4 96
IsothermalStressDevelopment
Concrete Stress (psi)
Results
0
Reduction in Stress Compared to Control (%)
30
1.4 0.7 0 0.42 0.36 0.30 24 48 Concrete Age (hrs) 72 96 -0.7 -1.4 -2.1
Outline
StressDevelopmentMechanisms TestingEquipment ExperimentalWork Results
Conclusions
Mortarhasagreater autogenousstrainthanthatof concrete,duetotherestraintprovidedbycoarse aggregate. Asthew/cdecreases,autogenousstressandstrain increases. Useofprewettedlightweightaggregatesreduces or eliminates thestressdevelopmentandstraincaused byautogenousshrinkage.
Conclusions
300
InternalRelativeHumidity
Tension
Results
2.1
200
12/20/2012
ThankYouForYourTime! Questions?