Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Algorytm Projektowy - PED Mixer
Algorytm Projektowy - PED Mixer
=
Select a tank according to BN-64/2221-09 (1)
2. SELECTION OF THE AGITATOR opened turbine mixer acc. to BN-75/2225-06 (2)
The type of agitator depends on the physical and chemical parameters of the mixed liquids, in
particular
Acc. to tab. 22.1 i 22.2 [1] (3) - mixer type X, XI
( ) 0.3 0.33
m w
d D =
0.5
m m
H d =
3. CALCULATION OF THE AGITATOR POWER
Power on the shaft:
1 2 3 s m
N k k k N =
k
1
coefficient taking into account the fill up ratio
w
c
D
H
k =
1
k
2
coefficient taking into account the increase of the power requirement during the startup
and under the change of density
k
3
coefficient taking into account the baffles and other structures causing resistance inside
the tank
N
m
Power of mixing [W]
( ) g , , , n , d f N
m m
q =
n [1/s] rotations of the agitator
m n
m
Fr Re C Mi =
Mi=f(Re
m
, type of the agitator)
=
3 5
n d
N
Mi
m
m
;
q
=
n d
Re
m
m
2
m
d
w
n
=
t
[1/s]
w [m/s] optimum tangential velocity acc. to table 22.2. (3)
for X, XI type and viscosity = 0,001-5 Pa
.
s w=4,27 m/s
n
m
- select from table 22.6 acc. to BN-62/2201-03 (3)
Power number Mi - read from the chart fig. 22.1 (3)
Power of mixing:
5 3
m m
N Mi d n =
4. STRENGTH CALCULATIONS OF THE AGITATOR SHAFT
Calculation of shaft diameter based on the shaft torsion condition (torsional stress)
s
o
s
s
k
W
M
s = t
k
s
[Pa] allowable torsional stress
s
e
s
X
R
k = [Pa]
R
e
[Pa] material yield point fig. 2.1 (4) [1-cz II]
X
s
- safety factor X
s
= (3,54)
W
o
torsional strength index (modulus)
16
3
w
o
d
W
=
t
[m
3
]
M
s
[N
.
m] torsional momentum
2
s
s
m
N
M
n t
=
[N
.
m] lub m] [N 163 0
m
w
s
n
N
, M =
Shaft diameter
c
k
M
d
s
s
w
+
>
3
16
t
[m] or c
k
M
, d
s
s
w
+ >
3
71 1 [m]
Select nominal shaft diameter based on table 22.7 [1] (3)
Check calculations of selected diameter for the allowable angle of the shaft torsion
lim
l l
| | | | | |
s
| |
\ . \ .
, where
dop
l
|
.
|
\
|
=1/m
t
180
=
|
.
|
\
|
o
s
I G
M
l
32
4
w
o
d
I
=
t
[m
4
] polar momentum of inertia
G [Pa] modulus of lateral elasticity (Kirchoffs)
Check calculations of selected diameter for transverse vibrations acc. to modified method
(0.55 0.8)
cr
A
e
e <
0,7 0,9
1 0.025
m
o w
d
A
D
q
q
| | | |
= +
| |
\ . \ .
[rad/s] vibrations in the system, angular velocity of the system
kr
[rad/s] critical vibrations, critical angular velocity
c
[Pa s] liquid viscosity
o
[Pa s] water viscosity at 20C
d
m
, D [m] - diameters of agitator and apparatus, respectively
2 n e t =
n - [1/s] - normalised roattion of the mixer
2
2
E I
cr
w
l m
o
e
=
w st s
m F =
l [m] - total length of the shaft
m
w
[kg/m] unit Wight of the shaft (the mass of 1 m long shaft)
E Young modulus
I [ m
4
] axial momentum of inertia
64
4
w
d
I
=
t
) m , a f ( = o
a relative length of the shaft segment a=l
1
/l
l
1
length of the shaft inside the tank
l m
m
m
w
=
- relative mass of vibrating assembly
m [kg] - agitator (propeller) mass (2)
read from the chart fig. 22.24. 2 (3)
5. POWER OF THE MOTOR DRIVING THE AGITATOR
[W]
d
o w
s
N N
N
q
+
=
2
2 exp0.1 1
o s c
c
h
N nd s p
s
| |
=
|
\ .
(6 10)
c
h s =
2
4.4 10
c s
s d
=
N
o
lost power acc. to [1] (3) pp. 442.
q
d
- driver efficiency (0.90,95)
6. CALCULATION OF THE TANK WALL THICKNES (5) [1]
C g g
o
+ =
Computational thickness of cylindrical shell under the internal pressure
ow
ow z
ow
ow w
o
p z k
a
,
p D
p z k
a
,
p D
g
=
+
=
3 2 3 2
D
w
, D
z
[m] - internal diameter, external diameter of cylindrical shell
p
ow
[Pa] - computational pressure (internal)
a - shell thickness factor (grubocienno)
k [Pa] - allowable tensile stress
z - weld strength coefficient
- Computational pressure
int ow h
p p p = +
p
rw
[Pa] - operational pressure (internal)
p
h
[Pa] - hydrostatic pressure
g H p
c h
= [Pa]
H [m] - the height of the liquid column acting on the wall
g
V [m
3
] - liquid volume
[s] - tank fill up (surge) time
(~ 90150 s)
Internal diameter of the nozzle pipe:
| | m
4
w
V
d
w
=
t
w [m/s] - linear velocity of liquid in the nozzle (w~1,0 m/s)
calculated value d
w
should be round off up to the closest, higher nominal diameter of the pipe
Select flat flanges acc. to PN-87/H-74731 (6)
Specify for each flange: D
n
, p
n
, pipe size, basic dimensions of the flange, number of the bolts and bolt
sizes (6)
8. CALCULATION OF WALL THISCKNESS OF ELIPSOIDAL BOTTOM (7) [1]
Bottoms acc. to standard PN-66/M-35412
C g g
o
+ =
C allowances acc. to point no. 6.
Computational/design wall thickness of the bottom under internal pressure
z k
y p D
g
w ow z
o
=
4
D
z
[m] - external diameter of the bottom
p
ow
[Pa] - design pressure (internal)
y
w
- strength coefficient (dished bottom round)
k [Pa] - allowable tensile stress as in section 6.
z - weld strength coefficient (for stamped bottoms z=1)
Design pressure
- for the lid/head p
ow
=p
rw
- for the bottom p
ow
=p
rw
+p
h
Design pressure should be normalised acc. to section 6.
Strength coefficient of dished bottom round
|
|
.
|
\
|
= e ,
D
H
f y
z
z
w
y
w
taken from table 3.1 [1] or chart fig. 3.3 [1]
H
z
[m] - height of rounded part of bottom read form the standard for bottoms
- attenuation/weakening coefficient
g D
d
z
otw
= e
d
otw
[m] - diameter of the nozzle opening
g [m] - wall thickness of the bottom
1. assume g
2. calculate
3. read y
w
4. calculate g
o
i g
5. verify if the assumed g is correct
Thickness of the steel sweet to be used for bottom manufacturing should be selected from table
2.11 [1]
9. SELECTION OF THE SUPPORT ARMS (8) [1]
Mass of the apparatus
2
c d w m r k u
m m m m m m m m = + + + + + +
m
c
[kg] weight of cylindrical part of the tank
m
d
[kg] weight of bottom (bottom area can be calculated as F
d
=1,16 D
2
or read from relevant
standard)
m
w
[kg] weight of the shaft
m
m
[kg] weight of the agitator
m
r
[kg] weight of the solution in the tank
m
k
[kg] weight of nozzles
m
u
[kg] weight of auxiliary equipment (assume m
u
= (100200) kg)
Size of the support arm should be taken from table 14.4 [1]
The size of support arm elements acc. to (8) [1]
10. LITERATURA:
[1] J. Piko Podstawy konstrukcji aparatury chemicznej cz I i II, PWN, Warszawa 1979
[2] F. Strk Mieszanie i mieszalniki, WNT, Warszawa 1981
[3] J. Piko Aparatura chemiczna, PWN, Warszawa 1978
[4] Praca zbiorowa pod redakcj J. Pikonia Atlas konstrukcji aparatury chemicznej, PWN,
Warszawa 1981