Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pisa73 Final 150dpi
Pisa73 Final 150dpi
Pisa73 Final 150dpi
Every year in Berlin on the 1st of May, the streets in certain neigh- the unrest, an action that would later result with him being
borhoods bear witness to an organized anarchy – annual rioting restrained in a “kettle” (a chain of police that has circumvented
– the sole purpose of which is arguably little more than some a group of protestors as a means of crowd control). This body of
cathartic collective act by the masses practicing their govern- work observes instances of unwarranted police brutality, while
ment-granted liberty to gather publicly and purge their plebian portraying the liabilities – injury, imprisonment, etc. – that such
hostilities, pent up since the previous year’s “riots”. Through riots represent for both sides, whether they’re deserved or not.
drunken demonstration and varying degrees of violence directed
(often rather sloppily) at the policemen called to duty on that PISA73’s depictions of the riot atmosphere from within the fray
particular day, these riots have become more touristic than legi- arouses a palpable sense of agitation, of unpredictability and sus-
timate, providing passive onlookers the fleeting adrenaline that picious semi-concealed movement. Barely visible delineations of
accompanies even the most inane rebellion against authority. riot gear and suggestions of effected punk youth trigger a heigh-
The whole charade brings to mind Rivarol’s infamous statement, tened awareness in the viewer, a FIGHT OR FLIGHT impulse. In
“The people did not want the Revolution, they only wanted the one painting, a demonstrator strides across the canvas, his pants
spectacle.’’1 tucked into combat boots, his back arched and head lowered as if
preparing to attack; in another, an almost indecipherable female
A recent series of work by Berlin-based artist PISA73, entitled figure is restrained by a riot cop cloaked in shadows. It’s not until
WALPURGISNACHT, revisits the events of April 30, when premature the final image, the clearest of the four, of a man conspicuously
riots tend to erupt in anticipation of the following day’s festivi- taking a photo while a POLIZIST looks on, that the viewer is retur-
ties. Derived from photographs that the artist took documenting ned to the spectacle inherent in these annual skirmishes.
Perhaps it‘s just the way the light falls One such work bearing the image of Heston is PRO GOOD, in
But everything looks like a target to me which Heston’s portrait is accompanied by a red cross and the
And I don‘t know where the gun is bold wording, JOIN US. PRO GOOD. A hovering gun dominates
But I‘m certain that it‘s pointed at me. the upper half of the composition, suspended mid-air like an
ascending icon. The insinuation of this ensemble is clear, making
Although the Western world’s classification of “punk” conforms sardonic reference to the religious right and their worship of the
to a preconceived narrative, long since taken hostage and automatic weapon. Heston’s altered value system renders him
commoditized by pop culture, the punk ethos, in the traditional an ironic figurehead, considering his ideological metamorphosis,
anti-authority sense, is still very much alive and well in Berlin. although, as Murray Edelman states, in our convoluted political
However, PISA73 observes that age “Metamorphosis becomes the norm.”8
punks have a tendency to fall
into cliché antagonistic roles The tone of PRO GOOD is cautionary, but this critique is not neces-
when attempting to oppose sarily confined to trigger-happy neo-conservatives. Every cultural
The Establishment writ large. subgroup obviously claims their mission is pro-good in order to
He views their misguided acts illicit mass-membership. “Good,” having been stripped of any
of violence as inadvertently absolute meaning ever since Nietzsche announced that God was
solidifying the US VS. THEM dead, has become a smokescreen onto which any community can
status quo – a textbook, albeit project its own self-proclaimed values.
innocuous display of what
Foucault described as the The rhetoric PISA73 re-contextualizes in his works is a signifier of
“immanence of resistance to our society’s counter-productive tendency to diametrically cont-
power.”7 It’s precisely this con- radict itself by employing the same vocabulary for opposing value
tradiction that PISA73 seeks to systems. The presence of the quotation mark as a motif in many
articulate in WALPURGISNACHT. of PISA73’s works is also central in understanding the work as
an abbreviated lexicon of absurdly re-appropriated imperatives,
Guns and masculine icons with words like “BEHOLD!” followed by the defeated dismissal,
also play a recurring role in “Nevermind.”
the work, most recognizably
Charlton Heston, the American PISA73’s assemblages of text and imagery bring to mind the
PRO GOOD, 2008 actor known for heroic movie works of Barbara Kruger, whose social criticism takes its form
spray-paint on mdf, 68 x 34 cm roles and conservative politics, in the pairing of ironic statements and simplified subject matter
reminiscent of advertising campaigns. Her iconic work, I SHOP longer resemble physical reality is an instance of the SIMULACRA
THEREFORE I AM, mocks the materialistic values of a consumerist that, as Baudrillard argues, replace the real with the “hyper-
society by sardonically real”, in that the depictions that have become more real than the
propagating its ideology, objects or persons they represent.9
just as another piece
raises feminist concerns of In his most recent works, such as the WALPURGISNACHT series,
patriarchal government by PISA73 has shifted his aesthetic from the flattened color panes
labeling the White House of his previous stencil work to a more abstract, fluid style that
as “Man’s Best Friend.” focuses less on explicit content and more on atmospheric repre-
sentation. These compositions are still based on stencils cut from
Barbara Kruger: UNTITLED
(I SHOP THEREFORE I AM),
photographs, but PISA73 applies his chosen forms to MDF board
1987, Photograph, 125 x 125 cm prepared with a coat of black paint using a unique technique that
© the artist, Sprüth Magers can be considered a contemporary interpretation of Paul Signac
(London, Berlin, Munich), Mary or Georges Seurat’s ubiquitous pointillism, subverting art histori-
Boone Gallery (New York)
cal reference points and leading them to a conceptual closure.
In his re-appropriation of imperatives, PISA73 creates self-de-
precating propaganda, basically propaganda that makes fun of Even though these works
propaganda, be it commercial, religious or political. Through are comprised only of
hyperbole, blatant hypocrisy and ideological incongruence, he dots, PISA73’s technique
asserts that all propaganda has become so transparent, it’s only diverges from Signac and
common sense to recognize the absurdity of its claims. Suerat’s conscientious
placement of each indivi-
PISA73’s preferred medium, the stencil, has its own ties to state
Paul Signac:
propaganda and the military, based on its historical use to label LE PONT DE VIVIERS, 1928
soldier helmets, duffle bags and other army accessories. The oil on canvas, 73 x 91,5 cm
same merits that made stencils an obvious choice for assembly- Private collection, Geneva, CH
line identification also rendered them the most effective medium
for guerrilla image-making. Quick, reproducible on a massive dual mark. The “points” in PISA73’s paintings are more random,
scale and easily transportable, stencils allow graffiti writers to but the artist’s deft application of spray paint allows him to cont-
commit their “crimes” in a matter of seconds in countless locati- rol their density, if not their precise application, resulting in vivid
ons. However, in PISA73’s practice, the stencil becomes a tool for luminosity in some places and subtle gradient shifts dissolving
painstakingly meticulous draftsmanship. into total darkness in others. This virtuosity with the aerosol can
stems from years of working as a graffiti writer.
Although stencils typically reduce forms to flattened bitonal
shapes, PISA73 layers a multitude of stencils for each subject, In his manipulation of the monochromatic, PISA73’s pointillist
achieving deceptive depth and a certain augmented photore- style is more reminiscent of Seurat’s drawings than of his vividly
alism. His images of women in particular take on the stylized colorful paintings. While PISA73 adds points of light to his solid
shadows characteristic of retouched supermodels or photoshop- black backgrounds, Seruat lifted his highlights out of the paper
ped celebrities. This practice of airbrushing images until they no itself, which he first covered in a uniform coating of charcoal, so
that he could excavate light from within the pictoral plane. As in At present, PISA73 spends much less time tagging the streets
Seurat’s drawings, PISA73’s subjects, when lit from behind, are illegally and much more time in the studio, creating work to be
illuminated in semi-halos, iridescently glowing in the otherwise exhibited, legally, inside. As such, one could make the argument
overwhelming sea of black. that PISA73 has lost some of his rebellious credibility and that the
work itself is less subversive since the artist is operating within
The objects and the parameters outlined by the very authority he seeks to under-
bodies portrayed in mine. However, by deconstructing and reassembling appendages
these recent works of propaganda with ironic
are depicted in acu- hyperbole and cynical humour,
tely minimal shapes. PISA73 takes aim at the
The abstract shift in systems of power he opposes
PISA73’s aesthetic, from via parody and, according to
explicit appropriation to Baudrillard, “parody makes
suggested representa- obedience and transgression
tion, signifies a critical equivalent, and that is the
departure from his most serious crime, since it
earlier works and, just cancels out the difference on
as Seurat abandoned which the law is based.”11
“the contour line of his Although the artist himself
training,” PISA73 now declares that TALK IS CHEAP,
refuses the rigid outline his work asserts the inherent
Georges Seurat: of the stencil, allowing and undeniable democratic
EMBROIDERY (THE ARTIST‘S MOTHER),
1882–83, conte crayon on paper,
his forms to oscillate value of vocalizing dissent,
32 x 24 cm between substance regardless of the target.
and radiance. In doing
so, these images achieve a different kind of realism; in the same
manner that Seurat created an “impossibly accurate description
of subjects using the barest of means.”10