Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microwave Power Coupling With Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Using Langmuir Probe
Microwave Power Coupling With Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Using Langmuir Probe
Microwave Power Coupling With Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Using Langmuir Probe
1
journal of July 2013
physics pp. 157167
Microwave power coupling with electron cyclotron
resonance plasma using Langmuir probe
S K JAIN
p
_
kT
e
_
, (1)
where V
probe
is the probe voltage and
p
is the plasma potential. The electron density N
e
is determined from the ion saturation current I
is
given by
I
is
= 0.5eN
e
A
_
_
(kT
e
)
M
i
_
, (2)
where A is the probe area and M
i
is the ion mass. The electron temperature T
e
is deter-
mined from the inverse slope of the electron current (log scale) vs. probe voltage (linear)
plot, and it is given by
T
e
=
(e/k)
_
ln(I
e
)/V
probe
_
.
(3)
5. Results and discussion
The experiment was carried out with argon gas at a pressure of 2 10
4
mbar. The
source was operated in resonant conditions of the magnetic eld. All the three solenoid
coils were independently energized and tuned at a solenoid current up to 50 A. The
measurements were carried out for both positive and negative bias up to the ion and
electron saturation current. The probe current was recorded for different probe voltages.
The voltage to the probe was applied using a standard bipolar power supply. I V curve
obtained from the Langmuir probe for argon plasma is shown in gure 5. This I V curve
was used for determining the oating potential, plasma potential, ion saturation current,
and electron saturation current. To evaluate the electron temperature by the graphical
method, the variation of the electron current (natural log) with the probe voltage (linear
scale) was plotted, as shown in gure 6. Parametric studies were carried out to optimize
the plasma parameters.
The oating potential, the plasma potential, the ion saturation current, and the electron
saturation current obtained from the I V curve are 34 V, 25 V, 850 A, and 5.5 mA
respectively. The higher value of electron saturation current obtained experimentally is
quite reasonable, as expected theoretically. Here, the electron saturation current was
recorded, just fewvolts above the plasma potential, to avoid excessive heating of the probe
tip, which leads to its melting. Experimentally, range of electron density and electron tem-
perature (29) 10
11
cm
3
and 315 eV respectively was obtained with the variation of
microwave power. The average electron density of 6 10
11
cm
3
, which is beyond the
cut-off electron density of 7.5 10
10
cm
3
and with average electron temperature of
9 eV, was obtained at 600 W of microwave power. The above range of electron density
is also suitable for ECR plasma-based applications like high-quality conductive/thin lm
Pramana J. Phys., Vol. 81, No. 1, July 2013 163
S K Jain et al
Figure 5. I V curve obtained from the Langmuir probe for argon plasma.
deposition [22,23], reactive ion (sputter) etching [24,25], molecular beam epitaxy [26,27],
ion implantation [28,29] etc.
Using the I V curve of the Langmuir probe, the electron density and electron tem-
perature were evaluated at different values of the microwave power. The variation of
the electron density, the electron temperature, and the product of electron density and
electron temperature, with the coupled microwave power (P
c
= P
in
P
r
) is shown in
Figure 6. The variation of the electron current (log scale) with probe voltage (linear
scale).
164 Pramana J. Phys., Vol. 81, No. 1, July 2013
Microwave power coupling with ECR plasma
Figure 7. The variation of (a) the electron density, (b) electron temperature, and
(c) product of electron density and electron temperature, with the coupled microwave
power.
Pramana J. Phys., Vol. 81, No. 1, July 2013 165
S K Jain et al
gures 7a, b and c respectively. This variation shows that the electron density and the
electron temperature can be controlled by varying the microwave power. The electron
density was found to increase non-linearly with increase in microwave power (gure 7a),
and the electron temperature was found to decrease with increase in the microwave power
(gure 7b). A similar variation in the electron density and the electron temperature with
respect to the microwave power has been reported in various experiments [30,31], and has
been explained in terms of two heating modes. There is an alternate phenomenological
explanation for the observed behaviour of electron density and electron temperature. For
a given absorbed power, the energy will be shared by the electrons to have same temper-
ature everywhere in a given plasma volume. As the power is increased, the product of
electron density and electron temperature should increase linearly with power, as it repre-
sents the total energy of the plasma electrons. This linear dependence is seen in gure 7c.
As the microwave power is increased, the excursion length of the electrons oscillating
in the microwave eld increases, thereby increasing the frequency of collisions with the
plasma ions/neutrals, leading to faster ionization (i.e. higher electron density). As the
increase of electron density with microwave power is linear (as seen in gure 7a), and as
the energy is shared by much more number of electrons than the increase in input power
(energy), the electron temperature decreases, as seen in gure 7b. A consistent plasma
discharge was also seen when the source was operated at higher magnetic elds.
6. Conclusion
A study of microwave power coupling to electron cyclotron resonance plasma was per-
formed using a Langmuir probe. It was observed that, with increasing microwave power,
the electron density of the plasma increases and the electron temperature decreases. It
was also observed that the optimum coupling to the plasma was obtained at 600 W
microwave power, with an average electron temperature of 9 eV and an average electron
density of 6 10
11
cm
3
.
References
[1] S Bilman, R Geller, W Hess and B C Jacquot, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-19, 2 (1972)
[2] T Taylor and J S C Wills, Nucl. Instrum. Methods: Phys. Res. A 309, 37 (1991)
[3] R Baskaran, S K Jain and S S Ramamurthy, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 2525 (1992)
[4] G S Taki, D K Chakraborty and R K Bhandari, Pramana J. Phys. 59, 775 (2002)
[5] P Kumar, G Rodrigues, U K Rao, C P Sasvan, D Kanjilal and A Roy, Pramana J. Phys. 59,
805 (2002)
[6] R Geller, Electron cyclotron resonance ion sources and ECR plasmas (Institute of Physics,
London, 1996)
[7] I G Brown, The physics and technology of ion sources (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989)
[8] H Zhang, Ion sources (Springer, New York, 1999)
[9] V K Yadav and D Bora, Pramana J. Phys. 63, 563 (2004)
[10] S Pesic, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 198, 593 (1982)
[11] S K Jain, Akhilesh Jain, P R Hannurkar and S Kotaiah, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 053301 (2007)
[12] S K Jain, Akhilesh Jain, P A Naik and P R Hannurkar, Sadhana (communicated)
[13] S K Jain, D Sharma, V K Senecha, P A Naik and P R Hannurkar, Sadhana (communicated)
166 Pramana J. Phys., Vol. 81, No. 1, July 2013
Microwave power coupling with ECR plasma
[14] Microwave Studio Software CST, Version 5.1, http://www.cst.de
[15] 2D Poisson code, Reference manual, LA-UR-87-126, LANL (1987)
[16] F F Chen, R H Huddlestone and S L Leonard, Plasma diagnostics techniques (Academic,
New York, 1965)
[17] J D Swift and M L Schwar, Electrical probes for plasma diagnostics (Elsevier, New York,
1969)
[18] I M Hutchinson, Principles of plasma diagnostics (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1987)
[19] N Hershkowitz, Plasma diagnostics (Academic, New York, 1989)
[20] M A Liberman and J Lichtenberg, Principles of plasma discharge and materials processing
(John Wiley & Sons, 2005)
[21] D Dorranian, F S Tahmasebi, Y Golian and M Alizadeh, J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 4, 27 (2010)
[22] B Chapman, Glow discharge process (Wiley, New York, 1980)
[23] X Fan, D Diao, K Wang and C Wang, Surface & Coating Technology 206, 1963 (2011)
[24] K Kretshmer, K Matl, G Lorenz and I Kessler, Solid State Technol. 33, 53 (1980)
[25] S M Sze, VLSI Technology (Mc-Graw Hill, New York, 1988)
[26] Z Sitar, M J Paisley, D K Smith and R F Dawis, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 2407 (1990)
[27] U Rossner, D Brun-Le Cunff, A Barski and B Daudin, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 2655 (1996)
[28] N Sakudo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods: Phys. Res. B 21, 168 (1987)
[29] K Matsuda and M Tanjyo, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 901 (1996)
[30] K D Vargheese and G Mohan Rao, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 467 (2000)
[31] V K Yadav, K Sathyanarayana and D Bora, Pramana J. Phys. 70, 487 (2008)
Pramana J. Phys., Vol. 81, No. 1, July 2013 167