For more in

Pu
M
(5
in

This White
IMPLIED O
reproduced
mechanica
MCL& Asso


PR
USING TH
nformation:
ublic and Med
MCL & Associa
540) 374-1551
nfo@mcl-assoc
Paper is for in
OR STATUTORY
d, stored in or
l, photocopyin
ociates, Inc.

ROCESS IM
HE PONZIO A
ia Relations
ates, Inc.
ciates.com
nformational pu
Y, AS TO THE IN
introduced into
g, recording, o

Copyright 2

MPROVE
ADS MATUR
A WH
urposes only.
NFORMATION
o a retrieval sy
or otherwise), o
2011 MCL & As




MENT ON
RITY MODEL
HITE PAPE







MCL& ASSOCI
IN THIS DOCU
ystem, or trans
or for any purp
ssociates, Inc.
N A SHOE
L (AMM) A
ER
MARK
ATES, INC. MA
UMENT. No par
smitted in any
pose, without t
All rights rese
STRING:
AS A KICK-S
LEFCOWITZ, C
MCL &
FREDERIC
http://www.m
AKES NO WARR
rt of this docum
form or by an
the express wr
erved.

TART
PREPARE
CMBB, PMP,
& ASSOCIATES
CKSBURG, VA
mcl-associates
RANTIES, EXPR
ment may be
y means (elect
ritten permissio
ED BY:

CLM
S, INC.
22405

s.com/
RESS,
tronic,
on of





MCL & A


Don't use
- America

Garbage-
- George F

By three
easiest; and
- Confuciu


1. INTR

Broadly de
improve ex
specific me
(CPI) is the
mores and

While little
either natio
Manageme
activity. E
remaining
approxima

In 2009, th
Technolog
$272.3 bill
combined
2008-2009
Annual Gr
Process Im

Clearly, pr
businesses
scaledoe
of current p
& 2007d).
Associates, Inc
e a lot where a
an Proverb
-In, Garbage-O
Fuechsel (IBM
methods we m
d third, by exp
us
RODUCTION
efined, process
xisting process
ethodology or
e institutionaliz
commonly hel
e empirical dat
onally or intern
ent market segm
Excluding corpo
Operations Ma
ation of global
he global Opera
gy segment reve
lion generated
amount of app
9 recession, Da
rowth Rate (CA
mprovement ma
rocess improve
and governme
es not necessar
process improv
c. 2011
PROCESS
THE
B
little will do.
Out.
M 305 RAMAC
may learn wis
erience, which
N
improvement
ses within an or
strategy to crea
zation of these
ld group value
ta is generally a
nationallyext
ment gives a ro
orate strategy s
anagement serv
process impro
ations Manage
enue totaled $6
by the entire g
roximately $13
atamonitor anal
AGR) of 7.1%
arket is expecte
ementunder i
ents are investi
rily imply the a
vement efforts
WH
S IMPROVE
PONZIO AD
By Mark Lefcow
Chief E
MCL &
Frederick
Phone:
Fax: (
http://www

Technician/Ins
sdom: first, by
h is the most bi
is, a series
rganization to m
ate successful
e improvement
s.
available to the
trapolating the
ough confirmat
services, huma
vices and Infor
ovement servi
ment segment
61.6 billion. T
global managem
33 billion for th
lysts forcast ac
for the five-ye
ed to be $187.6
its many guises
ing heavily. H
adoption of CP
are at the very
2
HITE PAPER
EMENT ON A
DS MATUR

witz, CMBB, P
Executive Offic
& Associates, In
ksburg, VA 22
: (540) 374-155
(540) 374-5578
w.mcl-associate
structor)
y reflection, w
tter.
of actions take
meet new goal
results (Brati,
efforts as a via
e public on the
e results of Dat
tion of the ove
an resource man
rmation Techn
ice activity.
revenue totale
This equals abo
ment & market
hese two segm
ccelorated grow
ear period 2009
6 billion by the
sis a hot top
owever, proces
I as a business
y least uneven,
Process
R
A SHOESTR
RITY MODEL
PMP, CLM
cer
nc.
2405
51
8
es.com
which is nobles
en by a process
ls and objective
, 2011, p. 2).
able cultural no
e full extent of
amonitors 201
rall global imp
nagement serv
ology services
d $71.5 billion
ut 26.3 % and
ting consultanc
ments. Despite
wth in this mark
9-2014. Based
e end of 2014.
ic of discussio
ss improvemen
s cultural norm
and at worst a
Improvemen
RING:
L
st; second, by
s owner to iden
es. These actio
Continuous pr
orm within the
process impro
10 estimates of
portance of pro
vices, and outso
are together a
n; the global In
22.6 %toget
cy industry. Th
a downturn in
ket, with an an
upon these pro
n, and an activ
nteven on a m
m. The efficienc
abysmal (Lefco
nt on a Shoes
May
y imitation, wh
ntify, analyze a
ons often follow
rocess improve
e organizations
ovement activ
f the Operation
ocess improvem
ourcing service
convenient
nformation
ther 48.9 %o
his generated a
demand durin
nticipated Comp
ojections, the g
vity into which
massive cumul
cy and effectiv
owitz, 2006b, 2
string
y 2011
hich is
and
w a
ement
s
vity
ns
ment
es, the
of the
g the
pound
global
lative
veness
2007a





MCL & A


Why then d
short of ou
We collect
to collect y
Accountan
program of
estimated
revenue.

Even the m
decision-m
validation
arguing ab
real issue,
only autho

Bad decisio
burdened c
manageme
entered, $1
and over ag
studies, an

E
be
ra
m
er

In the end,
improveme
Accurate in
component
beingsw
correct, eff

This paper
to begin th
authoritat
data is coll
values can

1
IIE (1996
2
Costs as
failure cos
failure cos
(costs incu
incurred to
Associates, Inc
do process imp
ur needs and ex
t, orinversely
yet more bad d
nts
1
whose resu
f some type, bu
of those that
most concerted,
makers make ba
by a set of gov
out what is the
What is the q
ritative data is
ons are costly.
cost of $3,000/
ent best practic
10 to cleanse an
gain." In a pap
d four code ins
Every study tha
e unacceptable
ates found in o
multiple errors,
rror.
the general fie
entis concern
nformation (i.e
t to that goal.
will not have the
ficient, and eff
r assertsregar
he process of in
tive datafor
lected and valid
occur.

6).
ssociated with p
ts, costs associ
ts costs asso
urred to determ
o keep failure a
c. 2011
provement effo
xpectations? W
yfail to colle
ata. Ross and
ults indicated t
ut of those only
did calculate th
, well-intention
ad decisions on
vernance entitie
e best data softw
quality of data s
being stored a
One company
year. A 2008 i
es results in co
nd de-dupe it, a
per presenting
spection experi
at has attempte
e in any organi
ther human ac
and even relat
eld of business
ned with trying
e., accurate and
Without it, dec
e right informa
fective response
rdless of metho
nstituting a stan
r data customer
dated to be au

providing poor
iated with defe
ciated with def
mine the degree
and appraisal c
ortsan activit
When everythin
ect, the right da
Perry (1999, p
that 82 % of its
y 33 % of them
he COQthat
ned efforts to p
n how to manag
es that support
ware applicatio
stored in my da
and used?
y (Abrams, 20
industry study
osts summarize
and $100 if no
the outcomes o
iments, Panko
ed to measure e
ization. These
tivities. With s
tively small sc
s management
g to maximize
d efficient data
cision-makers
ation, at the rig
e.
odology or app
ndard of accura
rs, both interna
uthoritative, n
r quality produ
ects found befo
fects found afte
e of conformanc
costs to a minim
3
ty that is so cur
ng is said-and-d
ata necessary to
p. 368) report a
s respondents s
m actually calcu
t quality costs a
produce proces
ge information
t the business e
on to use, busin
atabase, and ho
10) estimates th
(SirusDecison
ed by the "1-10
othing is done,
of 113 field au
(2008) reports
errors, without
error rates, fu
such high cell e
cratch pad spr
and specifica
the efficiency
a collection, sto
not necessari
ght time, to help
proachthat th
ate and validate
ally and externa
no other signific
ucts or service.
re the custome
er the customer
ce to quality re
mum (Elsmar C
Process
rrent in our col
done, the answ
o frame our qu
a 1996 survey b
said their comp
ulated the Cost
averaged from
s improvemen
n, or make bad
environment; i.
nesses and org
ow can I efficie
hat each spread
ns, 2008) repor
0-100" rule: "It
as the ramifica
udits conducted
s:
t exception, ha
urthermore, are
error rates, mo
readsheets will
ally the more n
and effectiven
orage, and retri
ily executives,
p them make th
he first step in
ed data collecti
ally. Without
cant institution
There are fou
er receives the p
r receives the p
equirements), a
Cove Mission)
Improvemen
llective imagin
wer appears to b
uestions, which
by the Institute
panies were inv
t of Quality (C
about six to te
ts are doomed
decisions base
e., authoritativ
ganizations nee
ently and effec
dsheet used in
rts that the failu
t takes $1 to ve
ations of the mi
d since 1995, 15
as found them a
e completely co
ost large sprea
l have a signifi
narrowly define
ness of business
ieval) is the sin
managers, or e
he right decisio
any process im
ion, storage, an
a fundamental
nalization of CP
ur categories of
product or ser
product or serv
and prevention
).
nt on a Shoes
May
nationfall we
be simply: bad
h inevitably lea
of Manageme
volved in a qua
OQ).
2
It was
en percent of
to failure when
ed on data that
ve data. Rathe
ed to focus on t
ctively validate
business has a
ure to follow da
erify a record a
istakes are felt
5 spreadsheet
at rates that wo
onsistent with e
adsheets will ha
icant probabili
ed field of proc
s operations.
ngle most impo
even human
on that will lea
mprovement eff
nd retrieval
change in the
PI practices an
of costs: interna
rvice, external
vice, appraisal
n costs) costs
string
y 2011
ell
data.
ad us
ent
ality
n
lacks
er than
the
e that
a
ata
s it is
t over
ould
error
ave
ty of
cess
ortant
ad to a
fort is
way
nd
al
l costs





MCL & A


Towards th
simple, stra
regardless

2. DATA

A recent st
and IT man

Pr
Fu
fin
su

Sp
sp
m

V
de
da

O
al
in

Po
bu
(3
em

Si
de

Anyone wi
give more
enough, bu
Enterprise
sold as pan
resource ou
An early p

A well-kno
erroneously
covered. A
systems as
dataset que

Associates, Inc
his end, the Pon
aightforward, s
of existing bus
A & DATA E
tudy conducted
nagers practice
rofit Myopia: 8
urthermore, 46
nancial perform
uccess
preadsheet Spa
preadsheets. T
managing the co
Vintage Data: H
ecisions is mor
ata they use
Outdated Planni
lmost a third (3
nvolved in this
oor Agility Cre
usiness process
33%) see plans
mployee moral
ilo Mentality: 8
escribing the li
ith hands-on ex
than a few hor
ut inaccuracies
Data Managem
naceas to solve
utlays associat
ersonal profess
own regional H
y paying out h
A previous ana
data; detailed
eries.
c. 2011
nzio Authorita
scalable, and to
siness size or e
ERRORS
d by Dynamic M
e Decision Ma
82% of busines
6% believe this
mance and 38%
aghetti: Manag
This figure rises
ompany throug
Handling data th
re than four mo
ing: Scenario p
30%) again not
process encou
eates Conseque
s or initiative a
s become obsol
le
87% of busine
inks between st
xperience with
rror stories abo
compound wh
ment (EDM), D
e this problem
ed with EDM/
sional experien
Health Care pro
health coverage
alysis of this iss
benefit inform
ative Data Sour
oo long overloo
existing organiz
Markets on beh
aking in the da
sses admit to n
s creates potent
% believe it res
gers typically sp
s with seniority
gh simple sprea
his way means
onths old; wors
planning fares l
t knowing the a
unter problems
ences: It can ta
and 83% of com
lete, 55% incur
sses criticize in
trategic goals,
h the problems
out their experi
hen there are m
Data Warehous
have in fact n
DW/SOA, the
nce may help to
ovider (herein,
e benefit to indi
sue revealed th
mation resided a
4
rce (ADS) Mat
oked tool to in
zational maturi
half of Oracle
ark The study
not having com
tially erroneou
sults in flawed
pend over a thi
y, with C-level
adsheets.
s it becomes ou
se still is that 2
little better, wi
age of critical d
ake nearly a ye
mpanies admit
r unnecessary c
nter-departmen
operational pla
associated with
ences with sc
multiple version
sing (DW), and
not. If anythin
problem has o
o clarify:
referred to as W
ividuals for pro
hat not all bene
as text, and we
Process
turity Model (P
nitiate with all p
ity.
(Oracle, May 2
y report highli
mplete visibility
us business deci
business plann
ird (36%) of th
l executives spe
utdated quickly
28% of manage
ith data being t
data; it is no su
ar and a half to
to suffering co
cost and 43% w
ntal data sharin
ans and budget
h the collecting
rubbing data.
ns of the same d
d Service Orien
ng, due to the tr
only exacerbate
We-Have-You
ocedures for w
efit information
ere therefore no
Improvemen
Ponzio, 2003) i
process improv
2011, p. 1) rev
ghted six findi
y into profits by
isions, 40% fee
ning that will h
heir week numb
ending 40% of
y: on average, d
ers do not even
typically six mo
urprise that 95%
o identify and a
onsequences of
witness a negat
ng and commun
ts as fragmen
g and storing o
Errors on spr
data used by d
nted Architectu
remendous com
ed.
u-Covered Hea
which they were
n resided within
ot retrievable th
nt on a Shoes
May
is presented as
vement efforts,
veals senior bus
ings:
y line of busine
el this can imp
hamper busines
ber crunching i
f their time
data used to ma
n know the age
onths old, with
% of responden
amend a failing
f this. One thir
tive impact on
nication with 7
ted
of data can prob
readsheets are b
different individ
ure (SOA)wh
mplexity and
lth (WHYCH)
e not actually
n WHYCHs
hrough normal
string
y 2011
a
,
siness
ess.
pair
ss
in
ake
of the
h
nts
g
rd
71%
bably
bad
duals.
hile
, was
l





MCL & A

Interviews
subject ma
diverse bus

The m
The un
a 1,
benefi
busine
for new
The in
genera
unifor
The ap
benefi
There
resulte
compl
custom
benefi

A Six Sigm
program
annually.

Changes in
data reposi
CSR alread
benefit info
of informa

WHYCHs
avoiding g
benefit info

When circu
benefit serv
multiple re

At the time
company.
Sigma train

3
PAR (Pri
approval b
high-dollar
4
PPO (Pre
physicians
provide he
Associates, Inc
, conducted alm
atter experts an
siness units on
methodology fo
niverse of inde
a 2 or a 3,
its to be listed f
ess grew in com
w benefits, res
ndexing system
ally, did not ha
rmly together.
pproach to ben
it packages.
was also a seri
ed in similar be
letely different
mer service rep
it question, but
ma study on CS
revealed that 6
n specific group
itory. General
dy knew the an
formation was i
ation, preventin
s policy of hon
giving misinfor
formation, or an
umstances forc
vice types, the
e-calculations.
e, WHYCH ha
Program mana
ning and certif

ior Approval R
y the insurance
r durable medi
eferred Provide
, hospitals, and
alth services to
c. 2011
most exclusive
nd functional lin
n some general
r indexing and
ex numbers wa
, signifying spe
for each of the
mplexity, it per
ulting in a loss
m became diffic
ave the same la
nefit categoriza
ious lack of co
enefit packages
name to the cu
presentatives (C
t often lead to i
SR documentat
68% of all afte
p benefit inform
benefit and rid
nswer. Withou
impossible to i
ng a simple, str
noring out-of-b
mation. CSRs
n over-abundan
ced CSRs to ca
process was fr
ad embarked up
agers were enc
fication was est

Review): Certai
e carrier prior t
cal equipment,
er Organization
d other health c
o their custome
ely from the PA
ne-workers pro
functional issu
d organizing be
s too small; a 5
ecific product l
three product
riodically becam
s of important h
cult to navigate
ast 4-digit ident
ation did not ac
onsistency in th
s often having
ustomer than th
CSRs) to spend
incorrect inform
tion timefor
r call time was
mation could t
der information
ut specific grou
identify. Often
raightforward a
benefit misinfor
s tended to resp
nce of detailed
alculate out-of-
frequently comp
pon an aggressi
couraged to obt
tablished intern
in covered heal
to the actual re
, certain surgic
ns): A manage
care providers
ers at reduced r
5
AR
3
/PPO
4
side
oduced some u
ues:
enefits were ou
5-digit number
lines, allowed
lines, 3,000 ca
me necessary t
historical busin
e - similar bene
tifier, and simi
ccurately reflec
he WHYCH en
the same name
he in-house na
d a great deal o
mation being g
all lines of bus
s spent docume
take up to two w
n, for a specific
up number, diag
n, both provide
answer to the m
rmation given
pond to membe
d information th
-pocket accumu
plex, requiring
ive plan to ado
tain PMI (Proje
nally. Substan
lth care service
endering of the
cal procedures,
ed care classific
who have cont
rates.
Process
e of the busines
unexpected una
utmoded.
ring system, wi
only 1,000 pos
ategories of ben
to reuse old, ou
ness data to the
efits within eac
lar types of ben
ct how WHYCH
nterprise produ
e, and other be
me prescribed
of time finding
given to the me
siness, except f
enting the call,
weeks to be da
c group, was o
gnosis codes a
ers and member
members quest
by CSRs, led t
er benefit quest
hat covered all
ulation informa
g time-intensive
opt industry bes
ect Manageme
ntial resources w
es identified b
service; typica
and certain sp
cation that is a
tracted with an
Improvemen
ss, with busine
animity among
ith the first dig
ssible individu
nefits in all. O
ut-of-date bene
e company.
ch of the three
nefits were not
H marketed or
ct line naming
enefit packages
by WHYCH.
the correct ans
ember.
for the compan
costing WHY
ata entered into
ften difficult to
and procedure c
rs, alike, were
tion.
to the general b
tions with eithe
eventualities.
ation by hand,
e research, lead
st practices thr
ent Institute) ce
were committe
by select criter
ally, this includ
pecified drugs a
variation of th
n insurance carr
nt on a Shoes
May
ess and technic
representative
git being reserv
ual categories o
Over time, as lin
efit index numb
lines of busine
t always catego
administered
convention. T
s marketed und
This often led
swer to a memb
nys federal
YCH $2.7 millio
o WHYCH cen
o find, unless t
codes, more de
missing key pi
business practi
er very general

for a variety o
ding inevitably
roughout the
ertification. Six
ed to the creatio
ria require
des transplants
and injections.
he HMOs, uniti
rier, and who
string
y 2011
al
es of
ved for
of
nes of
bers
ess,
orized
This
der
d
bers
on
ntral
the
etailed
ieces
ce of
l
of
y to
x
on of
s,
ing





MCL & A

an EDM an
effectivene

While mos
not surp
those famil

Panko (200

Fi
ac
In
11
85
In
sp
C
us
sp
sp
In
m
us
In a paper
Braithwait
2009), the
their suppl
Wilding de

T
th
th
fir
ot

The paper

M
O
M
Se
A
Sy
B
A

While Brai
implement
Associates, Inc
nd DW infrastr
ess, i.e. WHYC
st IT profession
risinglyare h
liar with the bu
08, p. 3) cites t
inancial intellig
ccording to its
n 2004, Revenu
18 business lea
5% were using
n 2003, the Hac
preadsheets for
CFO.com interv
se within the fi
preadsheets and
preadsheets.
n Europe, A.R.
multinationals th
se spreadsheets
prepared by LC
e and Richard
Data Crunch
liers. With no p
eliver what can
Thereport
he other way it
hat data across
rst is the scale
thers; the secon
sets out eight k
Measure actual p
On physical dim
Monitor and ana
et up a perpetu
Apply the frame
ystematically i
uild six sigma
Automate data a
ithwaite & Wil
tation.
c. 2011
ructure. Yet, th
CH giving its cu
nals can doubtl
hard to come b
usiness landsca
the following s
gence firm CO
experience.
ueRecognition.
aders. IDC fou
g spreadsheets f
cket Group sur
r planning and
viewed 168 fin
inance departm
d basic budgeti
C. Morgan inte
hat do business
s for both man
CP Consulting
Wilding repor
h Report. The
preamble to lig
n only be descr
identified an 8
means that the
the top 4 retail
of investments
nd is the contex
key steps towa
performance
mensions, use e
alyse data adju
ual audit proces
ework to identi
improve Proces
accuracy into
alignment wher
lding guidance
hese considera
ustomers timel
lessly relate sim
by. However, a
ape, today.
studies:
ODA reports tha
.com (now Sof
und that 85% w
for budgeting a
rveyed mid-siz
budgeting.
nance executive
ment. Out of 14
ing and plannin
erviewed 376 i
s in the United
aging the contr
g for joint publi
t on the GS1 U
e report investig
ghten the impa
ribed as a defin
80% level of da
ere is only a 20
lers. This appe
s that have bee
xt of an increa
ard securing hig
continuously.
equipment like
ustments.
ss.
ify value poten
sses to manage
cross-function
re possible.
e is spot-onu
6
able investment
ly and accurate
milar anecdota
a few studies h
at 95% of U.S.
fttrax.com), had
were using spre
and forecasting
e companies.
es in 2004. The
4 technologies d
ng system. Eve
individuals res
d States. More t
rol environmen
ication with Ze
UK and Cranfie
gated data inac
act of the execu
nitive attention
ata inconsistenc
0% chance of th
ars to be a rem
en made in iden
sing culture of
gher levels of d

CubiScan to c
ntial and focus
e input.
nal KPIs and m
unfortunately
Process
ts had not resu
e information.
l narratives, qu
have been repor
. firms use spre
d the Internatio
eadsheets in rep
g.
It found that 4
e interviews as
discussed, only
ery subject said
ponsible for ov
than 80% of th
nt and financia
etes (Braithwai
eld School of M
ccuracies amon
utive summary
grabber in the
cy between UK
he data at a sup
markable scale o
ntification and
f Lean manag
data accuracy:
apture missing
on the big opp
make data qualit
it lacks a sugg
Improvemen
ulted in more ef
uantitative stud
rted whose resu
eadsheets for fi
onal Data Corp
porting and for
7% of compan
sked about info
y two were wid
d that their dep
verseeing SOX
he respondents
al reporting.
ite & Wilding,
Management St
ng the top five
of their analys
opening sente
K retailers and
pplier being ex
of inaccuracy f
data capture w
gement and Six
g data on goods
portunities.
ty everyones r
gested roadmap
nt on a Shoes
May
fficiency and
dies on data err
ults will not su
financial report
poration intervi
recasting and th
nies use stand-a
ormation techn
dely used
partment use
X compliance in
said that their
2010) Alan
tudy (GSI UK,
UK retailers an
sis, Braithwaite
ences of their p
their suppliers
xactly the same
for two reasons
with Zetes, amo
x sigma quality
s receipt.
responsibility.
p for
string
y 2011
rors
urprise
ting
iew
hat
alone
nology
n
firms
,
nd
e and
paper:
s. Put
e as
s. The
ong
y.






MCL & A


3. BETW

The concep
Standards o
then out of
the pursuit
How do I
were appli

In contrast
itself with
operations
important i
p2). Recog
benign neg

In 1911, Fr
fathers of
Manageme
Gantt, and
the emergi
individuals
a field in it

Process im
Harrington
& 1961). T
movement
model. To
quality pro

Thinkers a
be applied
Demings
renamed "P
business po

As early as
community
April 1979
of the deca
(Crosby, 1
a concerte
the U.S. A
Departmen

5
Specifica
6
Specifica
Associates, Inc
WEEN A RO
pt of business m
of measuremen
f necessity, the
t of commerce
I know that the
ed solely as a m
t, the modern q
the problems o
. By the turn o
issues of conse
gnition emerge
glect, managem
rederick W. Ta
scientific man
ent. In addition
Harrington Em
ng principles o
s like Joseph M
ts own right.
mprovement eff
n (1987) but de
These concepts
, and later also
oday, COQ has
oducts or servic
also began to gr
to semi-mecha
(1989) Plan, D
Plan, Do, Study
oor quality issu
s the mid-1970
ys ability to de
9) proposed a
ade, Philip Cro
979, p. 38 - 39
ed effort to dev
ir Force, Hump
nt of Defense (D

ally: Initiation,
ally: Uncertaint
c. 2011
OCK & A HA
maturity and st
nt and quality s
se standards ev
and business.
coin with whic
means of deter
quality moveme
of increasing ef
of the 19
th
Cent
ervation of reso
ed that errors in
ment inefficienc
aylor published
nagement gath
n to Taylor, pa
merson. In par
of assembly lin
M. Juran, W. Ed
forts are justifie
erived from the
sand others
o adopted by bo
s supplanted PQ
ce.
rapple with the
anical and non
Do, Check, Act
y, Act" (PDSA
ues.
0s, many indivi
eliver successf
stages for grow
sby had publis
9).
6
In 1986, W
velop a capabi
phrey and his a
DoD) in evalu

Contagion, Co
ty, Awakening
ARD PLACE
tandardization
stretch all the w
volved so that
How do I kno
ch you offer pa
rring fraud in c
entmanifestl
fficiency and e
tury, it had bec
ources and nati
n quality were
cy, as well as t
d, The Principl
hered at Dartm
articipants inclu
rallel, the alread
ne production.
dwards Demin
ed based on Po
e concept of qu
were subsequ
oth Six Sigma
QC as the phra
e possibility tha
-mechanical pr
(PDCA) cycle
A) begin to c
idual were disc
ful large, comp
wth model
5
fo
shed his Quality
Watts Humphr
ility maturity m
associates bega
ating the capab
ontrol, Integrat
g, Enlightenmen
7
E
of practices ca
way back into
individuals and
ow that the wei
ayment is of pu
ommerce; i.e.,
ly the product o
effectiveness o
came clear that
ional efficiency
not just the res
task complexity
les of Scientific
mouth College f
uded Frank B.
dy well-establi
By the end of
g, and Taiichi
oor Quality Co
uality costs fi
uently adopted
and Lean think
se used to desc
at the methodo
rocesses with e
ebased upon
come to the for
cussing the imp
plex software p
for organization
y Management
rey joined the S
model for soft
an formalizing
bility of softwa
ion, Data Adm
nt, Wisdom, an
Process
an hardly be sa
antiquity. Firs
d localities cou
ight you are sta
ure gold? Init
quality of exc
of engineers an
f manual opera
t consideration
y that needed d
sult of premedi
y and the limit
c Management.
for the first Con
Gilbreth, Dr. L
ish principles o
the 20th Centu
Ohno, the qua
sts (PQC), a ph
irst described b
d by the Total Q
kers and practit
cribe the costs
ologies applied
equal effect. It
the work of W
e as a viable so
pact of comput
rojects. Richa
ns using inform
t Maturity Grid
Software Engin
ftware engineer
a process matu
are contractors
ministration, an
nd Certainty.
Improvemen
aid to new to th
st established fo
uld have comm
ating for my w
tially, standard
change.
nd business ma
ations, particul
ns of fraud asid
deliberation (L
itated malfeasa
s of human pro
. In that same
nference on Sc
Lillian M. Gilb
of mass produc
ury, through th
lity movement
hrase coined by
by Armand V.
Quality Manag
tioners in the
s associated wi
to mechanical
t is during this
W. A. Schewhar
olution to a alto
ting power on t
ard Nolan (July
mation technolo
d (QMMG) in,
neering Institut
ring. With a re
urity framewor
ability to deli
d Maturity.
nt on a Shoes
May
he business wo
for convenience
mon references
wool is accurate
ds of measurem
anagersconc
larly manufactu
e, there were a
efcowitz, 2007
ance, but also o
oductivity.
year, the found
cientific
breth, Henry L.
ction were appl
he work of
t was recognize
y H. James
Feigenbaum (1
gement (TQM)
hidden plant
ith providing p
l quality could
time-frame tha
rt (1939) and la
ogether new cl
the business
y 1973 & Marc
ogy (IT). By th
Quality is Fre
te (SEI), and b
esearch grant fr
rk to aid the U
iver successful
string
y 2011
rld.
e and
for
e?
ment
erned
uring
also
7a,
of
ding

lied to
ed as
1945
poor
also
at
ater
lass of
ch-
he end
ee
egan
rom
.S.
lly





MCL & A

software pr
the SEI eff

The maturi
Even the m
to that of o
groups ab
statistical p
whom they
occurs imm

Maturity
of sophistic
may, undou
understand
contrast, as
because th
decision-m
forms the b

Even befor
plethora of
some stand
as certifica
Internation
(OGC)]a

Certifying
with their c
associated

7
In a priva
16th Midw
120 maturi
and continu
stopped ad
8
For exam
Improveme
Capability
the current
9
The calcu
times 100;

Benefit
Cos

Associates, Inc
rojects as part
fort, the Capab
ity model appr
most basic of hu
other species, g
ility to perform
probability, rat
y are madem
mediately, but r
the attribute o
cation and und
ubtedly, obey t
d that to do so d
s a group, drive
ey tend to lack
making in the op
basis of every p
re the establish
f international,
dard and best p
ation.
8
Many
nal Organizatio
aggressively cl
institutions are
certification pr
with certificat

ate email, Brett
west Computer
ity models. Ov
ued to collect
dding them whe
mple, an organi
ent (SCAMPI)
Level of the o
t Maturity Leve
ulated monetar
i.e.:
100
Cost
st

c. 2011
of the contract
ility Maturity M
roach is based u
uman skill nee
gives testament
m any particula
ther than a state
must learn to be
rather increme
of judicious dec
derstanding lac
traffic regulati
decreases the li
ers under the a
k the experienc
peration of a m
process improv
hment of CMM
national, busi
practice, genera
y of these certif
on for Standard
laim significan
e often rather r
rocess. To be s
ion will certain

t Champlin, rel
r Conference
ver the next sev
t maturity mod
en he hit the 30
ization is appra
). The result of
organizations p
el or Capability
ry benefit of an
0
t award process
Model (CMM)
upon the prove
d be learned; t
t to the fact tha
ar skillat any
ement of an ab
e efficient and e
ntally over tim
cision-making
king in those l
ons out of fear
ikelihood of da
age of 25 years
e, familiarity, a
motor vehicle.
vement and qu
M (now CMMI,
iness, and gove
ally requiring s
fying organizat
dization (ISO) ,
nt increases in a
reticent when it
sure, some retic
nly vary with th
lates that he ga
held at Roosev
veral years, he
dels and then a
00 mark.
aised to the CM
f this appraisal
processes. The
y Level.
n investment, le
8
s. Seven years
).
erbial truism: y
he human race
at we are comp
y given momen
bsolute certaint
effective over t
me with a great
acquired over
ess fully devel
r or blind obedi
anger to both o
, are generally
and knowledge
Organizationa
ality improvem
, Capability Ma
ernmental orga
some sort of ce
tionse.g., the
, and the Unite
a Return on Inv
t comes to prov
cence is justifi
he business siz
ave a keynote p
velt University
occasionally u
analyze and ass
MMI using the
l determines eit
e SCAMPI pro
ess its total dire
Process
s later, Humphr
you must learn
es relatively lo
aratively slow
nt in timeon
ty. Groupsan
time. Mastery
deal of repetiti
time and based
loped. While s
ience to author
ourselves and to
less reliable d
e that generally
al maturityeit
ment effort dev
aturity Model I
anizations who
ertification or a
e Software Eng
ed Kingdom's O
vestment (RO
viding guidanc
iable; no two o
ze, its industry
presentation an
y. At the time h
updated the pre
sess them. Wi
Standard CMM
ther the organi
ocess is not a ce
ect and indirec
Improvemen
rey (1993) form
to walk before
ong period of c
learners. Any
a consistent ba
nd the individu
y of any comple
ion.
d upon experie
some of us bey
rity, most of us
o the entire gro
rivers than the
y result in good
ther explicitly
vised.
7

Integrated) the
se goal were th
appraisal proce
gineering Instit
Office of Gove
I).
9

ce on the expec
rganizations ar
type, and its o
nd paper in Apr
he had collect
esentation for o
thin a year or t
MI Appraisal M
izations Matur
ertification, bu
ct costs (Cost),
nt on a Shoes
May
mally reported
e you can run.
hildhood, in re
y individual or
asis is a problem
uals members o
ex skill set rare
ence denotes a
yond the age of
s obey because
oup as a whole
ir parents are
d judgment and
or implicitly
ere were already
he establishme
ss; referred, he
tute (SEI), the
ernment Comm
cted costs assoc
re the same. C
rganizational
ril 2002 for the
ted and analyz
one group or an
two, he finally
Method for Proc
rity Level or th
ut simply a ratin
divided by Co
string
y 2011
d on
elation
m in
of
ely
a level
f 25
e we
e. By
d

y a
nt of
erein,
merce
ciated
Costs
e
zed
nother
cess
he
ng of
ost,





MCL & A

maturity.
1
disclosure

However, i
gives the s
disclosure
standards a
functions h
improveme
establish a

Unfortunat
often less p
based upon
not someth
usually Fed

Economies
both more
the ability
and value a
Some nota

Cost of c
Duplicati
Top-heav
"Office p
Isolation
Slow resp
Inertia (u
Cannibal
Large ma
Public an
Other eff

These dise
frailtieso
insufficien
They may
needs not m
needs, wan
irrational.


10
The exte
managed, m
11
SEI (200
contract re
Process As
Associates, Inc
10
Data on ind
is understanda
it appears fair t
trong impressi
rather than con
aside (e.g., Ask
has become mo
ent goals and p
point of refere
tely, the lack o
painful than its
n these standar
hing any busine
deral or State d
s of scale are a
people and mo
to decrease co
added. Howev
able causes of d
ommunication
ion of effort
vy companies
politics"
of decision ma
ponse time
unwillingness to
ization
arket share / po
nd government
fects related to
conomies of sc
of both individ
nt information,
also be based u
met in the work
nts, and techno


ent to which an
measured, cont
02, p. 7) lists 24
venue. Of the
ssessment, Con
c. 2011
dividual compan
ably restricted.
to say that this
on that someth
ncerns over mi
k Process, 2005
ore apparent wi
priorities, as we
ence for apprai
of organizationa
s cure. Busines
rds. Quality ce
ess or organiza
dollarseither
primary differ
ore money; sm
sts, a portion o
ver, these econo
diseconomies o
n
akers from resu
o change)
ortfolio
opposition
size
cale are only th
duals and group
poor judgment
upon custom, c
k situation (H
logy. More of

n organization h
trolled, and con
4 early adopter
remaining two
nsulting & Trai
ny certification
s reticencewi
hing may be go
isinformation.
5), the need for
ith each passin
ell as need to p
ising their insti
al maturity tha
sses and organ
ertifications rep
ation attempts t
r directly or ind
rentiator in this
aller organizat
of whichin tu
omies of scale
of scale are:
ults of their dec
he symptom, n
psof every st
t, perceptions o
culture, and be
Hield, 1955, p. 6
ften than not, to
has explicitly a
ntinually impro
rs of CMMI; 2
o listed entities
ining, a compa
9
n costsof cou
idely reported
oing on that has
Regardless, th
r organizations
ng year. Organ
provide guidan
itutional ability
at results in poo
izations contin
present a signif
to initiate with
directlyare so
s regard. Large
tions have less.
urncan be pa
have a limit; v
cisions
ot the cause. T
tripe. Notably
of competition
lief system. O
6), and comple
o the outside ob
and consistentl
oved (CMMI P
22 of the listed
s, one was NAS
any specializing
Process
urseare privi
and commente
s more to do w
he ROI value o
s to integrate tr
nizations need t
ce for quality p
y to address com
or quality, ineff
nue to struggle
ficant investme
out extreme m
omehow involv
er organization
. With more
assed on to cus
very quickly, th
They result from
among these a
for limited res
Often, they are b
ex shifts in mar
bserver they m
ly deployed pro
Product Team,
entities were c
SA, a governm
g in CMMI app
Improvemen
ileged informa
ed upon on the
with organizatio
f these quality
raditionally sep
to be able to se
processes. Org
mplex tasks su
fficiency, and in
with establishi
ent of time, eff
motivation. In th
ved in the ROI
ns typically hav
comes greater
tomers through
he diseconomie
m cognitive an
are: perceived s
sources, and pr
based upon, s
rket forces due
may appear to b
ocesses that are
2007, p. 412).
companies with
ment agency, an
praisals.
nt on a Shoes
May
ation whose
worldwide we
onal protective
certification
parate organiza
et process
ganizations mu
uccessfully.
neffectiveness
ing quality pro
fort, and capital
he United Stat
I calculus.
11

ve more resour
r buying power
h decreased co
es of scale kick
nd mechanical
self-interest,
ressures of time
social tensions
e to changes in
be completely
e documented,

h significant Fe
nd the other wa
string
y 2011
eb
non-
ational
ust
is
ograms
l. It is
es,
rces -
r and
osts
k in.
e.
and
ederal
as





MCL & A

In short, co
dynamic th
often a cau

According
the United
businesses
employer f

Inexorably
rather pain
American E
average of
active con
first Federa
appear to b

Few small
actual dire
doing busin
certificatio

4. MAT

As already
upon exper
individual

As noted in

O
so
sp
or
ve

Th
ac
it

12
An empl
under com
income tax
more ($1 o
self-emplo
principal so
13
This figu
of active C
inactive), s
Associates, Inc
omplexity inva
han smaller org
uldron of boilin
to the U.S. Ce
States. In 200
desiring to bid
firms.
y, we are led to
nful process of
Express (VIP,
f $86,124incl
ntractors report
al contract (VI
be never truer t
to medium siz
ct and indirect
ness collects an
on, is there a vi
TURITY MO
y alluded to abo
rience, i.e. lear
maturity.
n Starkey, Tem
Organizational
omehow retriev
preadsheet data
rganizational m
ery useful in th
he parts of an o
ctive memory
chooses to rem

loyer firm is a
mmon ownership
xes. A nonemp
or more in the c
oyed individual
ource of incom
ure was provid
CCR registrants
so they provide
c. 2011
ariably offsets e
ganizations. W
ng human inter
ensus Bureaus
07, the Central
d on Federal co
the conclusion
attaining form
2010, p. 7)m
luding outlays
t that it took ne
P, p. 3). The s
than in this cas
zed businesses
out-of-pocket
nd store data, b
able alternativ
ODELS IN DY
ove, maturity is
rning based upo
mpest & McKin
l memory, broa
vable. Thus, st
a stored in com
members. How
he context of or
organization's
those that d
member from it

business organ
p or control, w
ployer business
construction in
ls operating ver
me.
ded by the US G
s in FY 2007
e an average ra
economies of s
What may appea
raction.
s 2007 Survey o
Contractor Re
ontractshad 4
n that only a m
mal quality certi
most active sm
and staff time
early two years
study further no
se (VIP, p. 5)
can afford suc
costs themselv
but only a sma
e?
YNAMIC EN
s an attribute o
on active mem
nlay (2005, p. 4
adly defined, in
torage files of
mputers, and the
wever, as with i
rganizational le
memory that a
define what an o
ts experience
nization or enti
with paid emplo
s is one that ha
ndustries), and
ry small uninc
General Servic
The number c
ather than a dis
10
scale. Larger o
ar to be monol
of Business Ow
egistry (CCR)
43,7901
13
acti
miniscule portio
ification. More
all businesses
pursuing the
s of trying (an
oted, The old
.
h a long payof
ves. It begs the
ll fraction wou
NVIRONME
of judicious dec
mory. However
41):
ncludes everyth
old invoices ar
e latest strategi
individual learn
earning.
are relevant for
organization pa
that is, indiv
ity consisting o
oyees excluding
as no paid empl
is subject to fe
orporated busin
es Administrat
changes daily (
crete total num
Process
organizations te
ithic and rather
wners, there ar
a required po
ive companies,
on of businesse
eoveraccord
contractors see
ese opportuniti
average of 1.7
adage it takes
ff cycle time on
e question, If
uld benefit from
ENTS
cision-making
r, organizationa
hing that is con
re part of that m
ic plan, as well
ning, such a sta
r organizationa
ays attention to
vidual and shar
of one domestic
g sole propriet
loyees, has ann
ederal income t
nesses, which
tion (GSA), an
(some become
mber.
Improvemen
end to be more
r static from th
re 5,739,890 em
oint of registrat
approximately
es actually need
ding to a study
eking Federal c
ies. The study
years or 20 mo
s money to ma
n an investmen
the vast numb
m industrial st
acquired over
al maturity is d
ntained in an or
memory. So ar
l as what is in t
atic definition
l learning are t
o, how it choos
red mental mod
c establishmen
tors and partner
nual business r
taxes. Most no
may or may no
nd represents th
active and oth
nt on a Shoes
May
e complex and
he outside, is in
mployer firms
1
tion for all
y 0.76 % of the
d to consider th
conducted by
contracts inves
reported that,
onths) to win t
ke money wo
nt, much less th
er of companie
trength quality
time and based
different from
rganization tha
re copies of let
the minds of al
of memory is n
those that cons
ses to act, and
dels. They may
nt (location) or
rs, subject to fe
receipts of $1,0
onemployers ar
ot be the owner
he average num
hers become
string
y 2011
more
n fact
12
in
e total
he
sted an
their
uld
he
es
y
d
at is
tters,
ll
not
titute
what
y be
more
federal
000 or
re
rs
mber





MCL & A

ex
or
im
m

This brings
maturity m
element of
learned be
through bu
respond to
maturity. T
used for gu
produce sp
Subsequen
example, K
maturity le
Crosby QM

Aside from
any but the
in a pletho
oriented ap

We live in
our institut
will be abl
without dis
organizatio
Complex m
approach
focus on is
core issues

Maturity is
before the



14
Paulk, et
mature sof
therefore n
15
Specifica
16
Specifica
Associates, Inc
xplicit or impli
rganization vie
mproving their
mental models.
s us directly to
model working
f choice. Know
ehavior in an in
usiness process
inputs that res
Thus, a maturi
uiding and imp
pecific, tangibl
nt process meth
Kleppe & Warm
evels (Paulk, et
MMG stepped
m the criticism
e largest of org
ra of hopeful
pproach.
a dynamic tec
tions. There is
e to maintain t
scomfort. Whi
onal maturity, o
maturity model
represent a si
ssues that affec
s.
s a reflective pr
window of opp

t al (1993, p. A
ftware process
not useful as a g
ally: No Specif
ally: Initial, Re
c. 2011
icit, tacit or wid
ews the world a
mental models
This process a
o how a maturit
definition. Lik
wing is not the
ndividual. With
seswhat busi
sult in some sor
ty model can b
proving future o
le output(s).
14

hodologies hav
mers (2010) si
t al, 1993, p. A
approach.
that many of th
ganizations, the
Cash Cows w
hnical, politica
s nothing in the
the same static
ile organization
organizational
lsparticularly
gnificant risk t
ct their core abi
rocess requirin
portunity for ac


A-11) defines m
. In addition t
generic workin
fication, Textu
epeatable, Defi
dely recognize
and takes actio
s; making thos
allows organiza
ty model differ
ke individual m
same as acting
hin the organiz
iness analysts r
rt of tangible o
be defined as, t
organizational
ve adopted CMM
ix Modeling M
A-11).
16
Both m
he maturity mo
e most distressi
whose authors a
al, cultural, and
e maturity mod
maturity level
nal process imp
maturity canno
y complex mat
to the vast majo
ility to remain
ng time. In our
ction has passe
maturity level a
to being obviou
ng definition.
ual Specificatio
ined, Managed
11
ed, but they hav
on. Organizatio
e mental mode
ational learnin
rs from organiz
maturity, organ
g. Taking cons
zation, learned
refer to as AS
outputby wh
the formal docu
l action in resp
MI as the basic
Maturity Levels
mirror the esse
odels are too co
ing aspect of th
appear eager to
d economic env
del approach, p
once attaine
provement doe
ot be obtained
turity models b
ority of busine
in business. A
r present circum
ed us by?
as, A well-def
usly software-o
on, Text With M
d, and Optimizi
Process
ve the capacity
onal learning is
els explicit is cr
g to be indepen
zational memo
nizational matu
sidered action b
behavior mani
-IS processes
ich organizatio
umentation of a
ponse to some s
c maturity mod
s (MMLs)
15
is
ential Nolan st
omplex for a fa
he maturity mo
o emulate SEI
vironment. Ch
er se, that guar
edindefinitely
es appear to be
through a cook
based upon the
esses because it
Assuring the qu
mstance, where
fined evolution
oriented, this d
Models, Model
ing.
Improvemen
y to affect the w
s dependent on
rucial to devel
ndent of any sp
ry, and conseq
urity depends up
based upon act
ifests itself thr
i.e., how org
ons make evide
a process meth
specific class of
del template an
very similar to
tages for grow
avorable return
odel approach i
s marketing su
hanges surroun
rantees that any
y, or without f
e strongly conn
kbook, cookie-
CMMI templa
t may constrain
uality of ones
e shall we find
nary plateau tow
definition seem
ls With Text, a
nt on a Shoes
May
way an individu
n individuals
oping new, sha
pecific individu
quently leads us
pon the critica
tive learning is
ough process.
ganizations act
ent their institu
hodology expre
of input(s) that
nd starting poin
o the five CMM
th model and
n-on-investmen
is that it has re
uccess of its gu
nd us, and with
y given organiz
further challeng
nected to
-cutter approac
ate and marketi
n their ability t
data is one of t
the time to ref
ward achieving
ms to be circular
and Precise Mo
string
y 2011
ual or
ared
ual.
s to a
l
s
It is
tually
utional
essly
will
nt. For
M
the
nt for
sulted
uru-
us
zation
ges, or
ch.
ing
to
those
flect
g a
r, and
odels.





MCL & A

5. THE

As previou
only confu
constraints

An Author
or source/p

A
so
tim
(U

Working w

O
pr
In
de

Th
us
en
fo
s

N
no
in
w

In response
governmen
When com
the right tr
According
repeatabilit
as a baselin
define them
ADS Matu

The feedba
which the


17
Private e
Associates, Inc
PONZIO AD
usly noted, mul
using, time-con
s.
ritative Data So
product to publ
An authoritativ
ourcesDevel
me as well as t
United States' A
with his custom
Organizations a
roduct, some u
n order to produ
ependent upon
he data provid
se of their data
nough situatio
or the provider
suitability for in
Neither the cons
ot in their miss
ndustry. My in
were to be an en
e, Ponzio deve
nt or commerci
mpared to other
rack.
to Ponzio, CM
ty of results. B
ne how to star
m as repeatable
urity Model] su
ack within the p
SMEs and con

email from Fra
c. 2011
DS MATURI
ltiple data sour
nsuming, and ex
ource is a recog
lish reliable an
ve data source m
loping a registr
the costs assoc
Army Data Tra
mer, the United
and individual
using out of poc
uce their own w
n the providers'
ers were not fu
a; the consumer
ons were proba
rs. The attitude
ntended use w
sumer nor the p
sion set), althou
ntent was to po
nabler for NCE
eloped a maturi
ial organization
maturity mode
MMI was still
Because of the a
rter kit process
e results. This t
uccessfully in m
process is imp
nsumers particip

ank Ponzio date
ITY MODEL
rces containing
xpensive to ma
gnized or offic
nd accurate data
may be the fun
ry that identifie
iated with main
ansformation O
States Army,
data providers
cket funds) we
work products
data.
ully aware of th
rs lacked any in
ably achieved
e was: If it's no
was individually
providers want
ugh in some ca
osition it for a c
ES to become a
ity model fram
n that relies on
els, Ponzios is
focusing on so
assumed cotta
would be hel
turned out to b
mission critical
ortant overall.
pate before rel
ed , May 17, 20
12
L
g potentially ina
aintain, they ca
cial data produc
a for subsequen
nctional combin
es the single tru
ntaining and v
Office).
Frank Ponzio
s (some using m
ere considered b
, those consum
heir consumer
n sight to the p
good enough
ot broken don't
y achieved.
ted to use the te
ases it was imp
call to action th
a reality.
17

mework, a stan
n external sourc
s elegant in its
oftware develop
age industry st
lpful and would
be true, and we
l military appli
We actually ad
lease of data.
011.
Process
accurate and o
an also directly
ction source wi
nt use by custo
nation of multi
usted or aut
erifying the ac
discovered tha
mission funds,
by consumers
mers had establi
population and
providers' proc
h for consume
t fix it. A wor
erm authoritat
plied. This is w
hat had to beco
ndard data qual
ce data forto
bevity and sim
pment; it was f
tarting point, I
d lead to repea
have used and
ications.
dded, in some
Improvemen
utdated copies
y lead to a host
ith a designate
omers.
iple, separate d
thoritative d
ccuracy of mult
at:
some as a deri
of their data to
ished processe
d were not priv
esses. The resu
rs and therefor
rking level ver
tive for a varie
why I termed thi
ome an enterpr
lity improveme
o others (Ponz
mplicitya sur
focusing on ac
felt that the fra
atable results w
d are continuing
cases, a data re
nt on a Shoes
May
s of data, are n
of COQ issue
d mission state
data
data source wil
tiple sources
ivative work
o be a data sour
s that were
vy to the intend
ult was that go
re good enoug
rsion of trust
ety of reasons
is a cottage
rise solution if
ent process for
zio, 2004, p.347
re sign that he i
chieving
amework part
without having t
g to use [the Po
eview board in
string
y 2011
not
s and
ement
l save
rce.
ded
ood
gh
and
(e.g.,
it
any
7).
is on
of this
to
onzio
n





MCL & A

Using the f

We see onl
1. Th
2. A
3. A
4. A
While each
real work o
mitigation
Adjudicati



18
Ponzio, 2
19
Ponzio, 2
Associates, Inc
familiar stages
ly four major p
he receipt of ad
An analysis of th
An adjudication
A feedback mec
h of the four pr
of the maturity
is presented
on processes.


2003, p. 3.
2003, p. 4.
c. 2011
of growth mo
F
process area:
dditions, chang
he submitted A
n of the product
chanism to imp
rocess areas are
y model is acco
in terms of the
Fig

del, Ponzio ou
Figure 1: Pon
ges, or deletion
ADS product da
t data; and
prove the ADS
e important, it
omplished. The
e necessary act
gure 2: Ponzio
13
utlines a simple
nzio ADS Fram
ns to ADS prod
ata and its prio
input process
is within the A
e five levels of
tion on the new
o ADS Maturi
Process
e high-level fra
mework
18

duct data or me
or version;
results in the fu
ADS Analysis a
f maturityeac
w information r
ity Model
19

Improvemen
amework mode
etadata;
future.
and Adjudicati
ch described in
received within
nt on a Shoes
May
el:

ion Process tha
n terms of risk
n the Analysis

string
y 2011
at the
and





MCL & A


Obviously,
processes,
subsequent
multiple da
Ponzios so
implement
have a data
policy and
need to imp
governance

The ADS F
methodolo

6. CON

Accurate a
blind chan

Associates, Inc
, depending up
what lies with
t presentation (
ata sources.
Fi
olution does no
tation of a com
a governance p
data governan
plement one
e process for th
Framework and
ogy for kick sta
CLUSION:
and timely info
ce, speculation
c. 2011
pon the size of
in each of the f
(Ponzio, 2004,
igure 3: ADS F
ot require outsi
mplex matrix of
policy in place
nce procedures
can simply im
heir organizatio
d Maturity Mo
arting any Cont
rmation is ever
n, false premise
the organizatio
four process bo
p. 348) on how
Framework S
ide appraisals,
f associated com
can simply add
. Those lackin
mplement includ
on.
odel represents
tinuous Proces
rything. Witho
es, and undisco
14
on, as well as th
oxes may diffe
w the ADS Ma
Scaled to addre
nor does it req
mponents. Org
d an Authoritat
ng a data gover
de Authoritativ
a significant, s
s Improvemen
out it, we are a
overed risk.
Process
he number and
er, wildly. Pon
aturity Model m
ess multiple d
quire extensive
ganizations wis
tive Data Sour
rnance policy
ve Data Source
straightforward
nt effort.
all adrift in a se
Improvemen
d complexity o
nzio provides g
may be scaled t

data sources
e model training
shing to implem
rce (ADS) secti
but perceiving
e (ADS) as part
d, and relativel
ea of possibiliti
nt on a Shoes
May
f its business
guidance in a
to accommoda
g, or
ment it who alr
ion to their exi
g a critical bus
t of that new
ly low cost
ies governed by
string
y 2011
ate
ready
isting
siness
y





MCL & A

Despite th
developed
too comple
of organiza

The Ponzi
despite the
provides u
Time tool
approach to

From my f
consider m


Associates, Inc
he interest and
over the past t
ex to provide a
ations and busi
o Maturity Mo
e current trend
us with a mode
thatwhen ju
o maturity mod
first exposure,
making the Ponz
c. 2011
acknowledged
two decades
a realistic retur
inesses.
odel is present
d of elitism an
el of minimali
udiciously app
del constructio
it has quickly
zio Maturity M

d need for Co
as well as the r
rn on investme
ted as an eleg
nd complexity
sm in design a
pliedis appro
on that all shou
become a key
Model an integr
15
ontinued Proce
related tools de
ent-to-risk ratio
ant solution to
keeping it s
and implement
opriate for any
uld emulate.
component of
ral element of y
Process
ess Improveme
eveloped to sup
o acceptable to
o a clear and p
simple is often
tation that sho
y organization
f my profession
your own profe
Improvemen
ent, many of t
pport themar
all but the lar
present proble
n more efficie
ould be an exa
or business o
nal tool kit. I
essional tool ki
nt on a Shoes
May
the maturity m
re too expensiv
rgest and well h
m. It reminds
nt and effectiv
ample of the Ju
of any size. It
strongly urge y
it, as well.
string
y 2011
models
ve and
heeled
s us
ve. It
ust-In-
t is an
you to





MCL & A

7. BIBL
Abrams, H
http://www
Ask Proces
http://www
Braithwait
http://www
Brati, D. (
of the IBIM
CMMI Pro
Software E
Cooke-Dav
Limited: ht
Cost Mana
Update (Is
Crosby, P.
Datamonit
Rockville,
Deming, W
Earnst & Y
New York
Elsmar Co
http://elsm
Feigenbaum
for improv
(Industrial
Feigenbaum
Feigenbaum
Galbreth, M
Business L
Associates, Inc
LIOGRAPHY
H. (October 201
w.eprentise.com
ss, Inc. (2005).
w.askprocess.co
e, A., & Wildi
w.lcpconsulting
(2011). Six Sig
MA (Vol. 2011
oduct Team. (2
Engineering Ins
vies, T. J. (n.d.
ttp://www.hum
agement Group
sue No. 102) ,
B. (1979). Qu
or. (July 15, 20
MD: Datamon
W. E. (1989). O
Young / IMA. (
: Ernst & Youn
ve Mission. (n
mar.com/wiki/in
m, A. V. (1945
ving product qu
Organization a
m, A. V. (1956
m, A. V. (1961
M. R., & LeBla
Logistics (Vol. 3
c. 2011
Y
10). How Do Y
m/blog/73-data
. CMM and CM
om/resources/a
ng, R. (2010, J
g.com/files/Ben
gma: A Key Dr
1, Article ID 82
2007, Novembe
stitute: www.se
.). Measuremen
mansystems.net
p of the Institut
1-2.
uality is Free. N
010). Industry
nitor.
Out of the Crisi
(2003). The Sta
ng.
n.d.). Quality A
ndex.php/Quali
5). Quality con
uality and desig
and Manageme
6). Total Qualit
1). Total Quali
anc, L. J. (2010
31, No. 2) , 21
You Calculate th
a-quality/284-h
MMI: Show Me
articles/GlobalK
June). LCP Con
nefit_and_cost
river for Proces
23656,): http://
er). CMMI fo
ei.cmu.edu/dow
nt of Organiza
t/papers/measu
te of Managem
New York: Mc
Market Resear
is. Boston: MIT
ate of Managem
ssurance Term
ity_Assurance_
ntrol: principles
gn and for redu
ent Series).
ty Control. Ha
ity Control. Ne
0). Overcomin
- 33.
16
he Cost of a Sp
how-do-you-cal
e the Value! Re
Knowledge/CM
nsulting. Retri
t_%20of_Data_
ss Improvemen
/www.ibimapub
or Acquisition,
wnloads/cmmi
tional Maturity
uring_organiza
ment Accountan
Graw Hill.
rch; Global - M
T Center for A
ment Accountin
ms Glossary. Re
_Terms_Gloss
s, practice and
ucing operatin
arvard Business
ew York: McGr
g Spreadsheet
Process
preadsheet? Re
lculate-the-cos
etrieved May 2
MMI-Value.pd
eved May 201
_accurancy_30
nt. Retrieved M
blishing.com/j
Version 1.2. R
i/07tr017.doc
y. Retrieved M
ational_maturity
nts (IMA). (No
Management &
dvanced Engin
ng: The Ernst &
etrieved 2011,
ary
d administratio
g costs and los
s Review, 34 (6
raw-Hill.
Risk in Supply
Improvemen
etrieved 4/201
st-of-a-sp
2011, from
df
1, from
0_June_10.pdf
May 2011, from
ournals/CIBIM
Retrieved May
May 2011, from
y.pdf
ov 1999). Cost
& Marketing Co
neering Study.
& Young and I
from
on; an industria
sses. New York
6) , pp. 93-101
y Chain Model
nt on a Shoes
May
1, from eprenti
f
m Communicati
MA/cibima.htm
2011, from
m Human System
Management
onsultancy.
IMA Survey (20
al managemen
k: McGraw-Hi
.
ling. Journal of
string
y 2011
ise:
ions
ml
ms
003).
t tool
ill
of





MCL & A

GS1 UK &
http://www
Harrington
Hield, W. (
11.
Humphrey
CMU/SEI-
http://www
Humphrey
Institute of
Kleppe, A.
(a Division
Lefcowitz,
(Volume 2,
associates.
Lefcowitz,
White Pap
Lefcowitz,
Retrieved f
Lefcowitz,
Associates
Lefcowitz,
TechRepub
Lefcowitz,
http://articl
Loya, T. A
culture: in
McFeeley,
Engineerin
Nolan, R. L
126.
Associates, Inc
& Cranfield Sch
w.gs1uk.org/res
n, H. J. (1987).
(Vol. 5, No. 1
y, W. S. (1987,
-87-TR-11, ESD
w.sei.cmu.edu/r
y, W. S. (1989)
f Industrial Eng
., & Warmer, J
n of Internet.co
, M. (2007a). Im
, Winter 2007,
com/download
, M. (2007b, N
er: http://www
, M. (2007d, Se
from MCL & A
, M. (2007c, O
s, White Paper:
, M. (2006a, Se
blic: http://artic
, M. (2006b, O
les.techrepubli
A., & Boli, J. (1
ternational non
R. (February
ng Institute.
L. (MarchApr
c. 2011
hool of Manag
sources/help_s
Poor-quality c
(March)). The
June). Charac
D-TR-87-112).
reports/87tr011
. Managing the
gineers. (Sept 1
J. (2010). Getti
om): http://www
Implementing S
pp. 18 - 28). R
ds/Implementin
November). Imp
w.mcl-associate
eptember). Res
Associates, Wh
ctober). TigerT
http://www.m
eptember). Use
cles.techrepubl
October). Why D
ic.com.com/51
1999). Standard
ngovernmental
1996). IDEAL:
ril 1979). Man
ement. (2009,
support/Pages/W
cost . Milwauk
Study of Chan
cterizing the Sof
Retrieved Ma
1.pdf
e Software Pro
1996). The Co
ing Started with
w.devx.com/en
Six Sigma: Issu
Retrieved from
ngSixSigma.pd
proving the Bus
es.com/downlo
sults, Not Servi
hite Paper: http
Team: High-Sp
mcl-associates.c
e the U.S. Army
lic.com.com/5
Does Process I
00-22_11-6124
dization in Wo
l organizations
: A Users Guid
naging The Cris
17
Oct). White Pa
White-Papers.a
kee: Marcel De
nge in Social S
oftware Proces
ay 2011, from S
ocess. Boston:
st of Quality. I
h Modeling Ma
nterprise/Articl
ues in Suboptim
MCL & Assoc
df
siness Process
ads/Improving
ice: Optimizing
p://www.mcl-a
peed, Low-Drag
com/download
y's approach to
100-22_11-61
Improvement F
4484.html
orld Policy. In J
s (pp. 169 - 197
de for Software
sis In Data Pro
Process
apers. Retrieve
aspx
ekker.
Science. The Br
s: a maturity fr
Software Engin
Addison-Wesl
IIE Solutions ,
aturity Levels.
le/26664/1954
mization, Journ
ciates: http://w
Model. Retrie
gTheBusinessP
g Management
associates.com/
g Process Imp
s/TigerTeam.p
o continuity pla
19262.html
Fail? Retrieved
J. Boli, & G. M
7). Stanford, C
e Process Impr
ocessing. Harva
Improvemen
ed May 2011, f
ritish Journal o
framework (Tec
neering Institut
ley.
9 .
Retrieved May
?pf=true
nal of Installati
www.mcl-
eved from MCL
ProcessModel.p
t and Informati
/downloads/Re
rovement. Retr
pdf
anning. Retriev
d from TechRep
M. Thomas, Co
CA: Stanford U
rovement. Pittsb
ard Business R
nt on a Shoes
May
from GSIUK:
of Sociology , p
chnical Report
te (SEI):
y 2011, from D
ion Manageme
L & Associates
pdf
ion Consulting
esultsNotServic
rieved from M
ved from
public:
onstructing wor
University Press
burgh: Softwar
Review 57 (2) ,
string
y 2011
pp. 1-
t,
DevX
nt
s,
g.
ce.pdf
CL &
rld
s.
re
115





MCL & A

Noland, R.
, 399405.
Oracle Cor
www.bitly
Panko, R. R
Research (
Paulk, M. C
Capability
Ponzio, J. F
Symbolic S
Framework
Ponzio, J. F
Conference
Ross, J. E.
SEI. (April
University
Shewhart,
SiriusDeci
Starkey, K
London: T
U.S. Censu
http://factf
United Sta
from http:/
Victory in
Procureme




Associates, Inc
. L. (July 1973

rporation. (May
y.com/kJuDzc
R. (May 2008)
SSR): http://pa
C., Weber, C. V
Maturity Mod
F. (November
Systems, Inc.,
k.html
F. (2004). Auth
e on Informatio
, & Perry, S. (1
l 2002; Version
.
W. A. (1939).
sions. (2008).
K., Tempest, S.,
homson.
us Bureau. (200
finder.census.g
ates' Army Data
//data.army.mil
Procurement (
ent Success. Ne
c. 2011
). Managing th
y 2011). Perfo
). What We Kno
anko.shidler.ha
V., Garcia, S. M
del Version 1.1
5, 2003). Auth
White Paper: h
horitative Data
on Quality; IC
1999). Total Q
n 0.51). Transi
Statistical Me
The Impact of
, & McKinlay,
07). Survey of
ov/
a Transformati
l/datastrategy_
(VIP) for Smal
ew York: Ame
he computer re
ormance Manag
ow About Spre
awaii.edu/ssr/M
M., Chrissis, M
. Pittsburgh: So
horitative Data
http://www.sym
a Source(ADS)
CIQ-04 (pp. 346
Quality Manage
itioning to CM
thod from the
f Bad Data on D
A. (2005). Ho
Business Own
ion Office. (n.d
_authoritative.h
l Business Pro
erican Express
18
source: a stage
gement: An Inc
eadsheet (revis
Mypapers/what
M. B., & Bush,
oftware Engine
Source (ADS)
mbolic.com/Ind
) Framwork an
6-357). Cambri
ement: text, cas
MMI: A Guide fo
Viewpoint of Q
Demand Creati
ow Organizatio
ers. Retrieved
d.). Army Net-C
html
gram. (2010).
Open.
Process
e hypothesis. C
complete Pictu
ed). Retrieved
tknow.htm
M. (February
eering Institute
Framework. R
dustry-Insight/
nd ADS Maturi
idge, MA: MIT
ses, and readin
for Executive. P
Quality Control
ion. Wilton, CT
ons Learn: man
May 2007, fro
Centric Data S
VIP Survey: St
Improvemen
Communication
ure. Retrieved M
4/2011, from
1993). Key Pr
e.
Retrieved 4/14/
/Authoritative-
ity Model. Nint
T.
ngs. Florence, K
Pittsburgh: Car
l. New York: D
T: SiriusDecisi
naging the sear
om Economic C
Strategy. Retrie
trategies for Sm
nt on a Shoes
May
ns of the ACM 1
May 2011, from
Spreadsheet
ractices of the
/2011, from
Data-Source-A
th Internationa
KY: CRC Pres
rnegie Mellon
Dover.
ions.
rch for knowled
Census:
eved May 2011
mall Business
string
y 2011
16 (7)
m
ADS-
al
ss.
dge.
1,