Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Initial Sizing of Fin Plate Connections
Initial Sizing of Fin Plate Connections
Initial Sizing of Fin Plate Connections
Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Created on Wednesday, March 27, 2013 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
Typical connections Choice of fin plate connection Choice of bolt type Number of bolts in a fin plate connection Fin plate dimensions Weld size Ductility Rotation capacity Limits of application Background
2 2 3 3 5 6 7 7 7 7
6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Page 1
1.
Typical connections
Fin plates are used for beam/column and beam/beam connections. Typical connections using a single vertical line of bolts are shown in Figure 1.1.
Created on Wednesday, March 27, 2013 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
Figure 1.1
2.
There are two basic types of fin plate connections (see figure 2.1):
If 0,75 VC,Rd VEd > 0,5 VC,Rd adopt a fin plate with two vertical lines of bolts If VEd
> 0,75 VC, Rd
In the above expressions: VEd VC,Rd is the design shear force and is the design shear resistance of the supported beam Page 2
Figure 2.1
Fin plate connections with one and two vertical lines of bolts
Created on Wednesday, March 27, 2013 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
3.
It is recommended to use one grade and one diameter of bolt in a limited range of lengths. This document and the NCCIs for shear and tying resistance of fin plate connections (SN017 and SN018) relate to Category A bearing type connections (as defined in EN1993-1-8 3.4.1), using non-preloaded bolts. For this type of connection, the bolt class which is usually used depends on the country of construction: class 10.9 bolts are used in most of Europe, but class 8.8 bolts are used in France and UK. Usually, bolts should be fully threaded. The commonly used size is: Bolt diameter = 20 mm Length = 60 mm. However, the verification procedures for fin plate connections shown in SN017 and SN018 are valid for bolts from class 4.6 to class 10.9 with different diameter and length.
4.
n= VEd K
The minimum number of bolts (M20, class 8.8 or 10.9) to be adopted is given by:
Where: n is the total number of bolts (i.e n1 n2 ) n1 is number of horizontal rows of bolts Page 3
n2 is number of vertical lines of bolts (For one vertical line of bolts, n should be rounded up to the nearest whole number, For two vertical lines of bolts, n should be rounded up to the nearest multiple of 2) VEd is the design shear force in kN The value of K depends on the type of fin plate connection (i.e. one or two vertical lines of bolts). Tables 4.1 and 4.2 below give the values of K for the two cases.
Table 4.1 Values of K for one vertical line of bolts (i.e. n2 = 1)
Depth of supported beam hb1 mm
hb1 400
S235
h b1 > 600
Created on Wednesday, March 27, 2013 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
h b1 400
S275
hb1 400
S355
Table 4.2
S235
S275
S355
Page 4
bp gh gv
e1 p1 p1 e1
a hp
e 2 p 2 e2,b z
he
Figure 4.2
Created on Wednesday, March 27, 2013 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
5.
a) Depending on the bolt diameter, choose end and edge distances not less than 2d:
b) Height of fin plate Minimum height of fin plate hp = 0,6hb1 Maximum height of fin plate = d b1 Note: Commonly the height of fin plate is rounded up to the nearest 10mm. c) Vertical bolt spacing: depends on the number of bolts. For M20 bolts p1 should not be less than 70 mm. d) For M20 bolts, the following dimensions are recommended, depending on the depth of the supported beam.
Table 5.1 Thickness and width of fin plates for one vertical line of bolts (n2 = 1)
Fin plate thickness tp (mm) 10 10 Fin plate width bp (mm) Horizontal gap gh (mm) 10 20 Beam edge distance e2,b (mm) 40 40 Fin plate edge distance e2 (mm) 50 60
100 120
Page 5
Table 5.2
Thickness and width of fin plates for two vertical lines of bolts (n2 = 2)
Fin plate thickness tp (mm) 10 10 Fin plate width bp (mm) 160 180 Horizontal gap gh (mm) 10 20 Beam edge distance e2,b (mm) 40 40 Transverse bolt pitch p2 (mm) 60 60 Fin plate edge distance e2 (mm) 50 60
is the bolt diameter is the distance between fillets of the supported beam is the depth of the supported beam is the height of the fin plate is the end distance to the edge of the beam or to the edge of the notch
6.
Table 6.1
Weld size
Size of fillet weld for different fin plate steel grades and thicknesses.
Dimensions, for fin plate thickness tp 8 mm Throat a (mm) S235 S275 S355 4 4 5 Leg length s (mm) 6 6 7 Throat a (mm) 5 5 5,5 10 mm Leg length s (mm) 7 7 8
Adopt the following fillet weld sizes, depending on the fin plate steel grade and thickness.
tp
1 a 2
Figure 6.2
Page 6
7.
Ductility
The details given in this NCCI will provide sufficient ductility to meet the requirements of Section 16 of SN017.
8.
Rotation capacity
The details given in this NCCI will provide sufficient rotation capacity for the connection to be treated as a simple joint.
9.
Limits of application
This NCCI applies to one or two vertical lines of bolts (i.e. n2=1 or n2=2) using non-preloaded bolts for Category A: Bearing type bolted connection in accordance with EN1993-1-8 3.4.1.
Created on Wednesday, March 27, 2013 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
10. Background
The rules in this NCCI are based on: (1) European recommendations for the design of simple joints in steel structures Document prepared under the supervision of ECCS TC10 by: J.P. Jaspart, S. Renkin and M.L. Guillaume - First draft, September 2003. (2) Joints in Steel Construction Simple Connections (P212). The Steel Construction Institute and The British Constructional Association Ltd., 2002.
Page 7
Quality Record
Name Created by Technical content checked by Editorial content checked by Technical content endorsed by the following STEEL Partners: 1. UK
Created on Wednesday, March 27, 2013 This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
2. France 3. Germany 4. Sweden 5. Spain Resource approved by Technical Coordinator TRANSLATED DOCUMENT This Translation made and checked by Translated resource approved by:
Page 8