ZAMBOANGA CITY STATE POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM For the rating period JUNE to OCTOBER 2012

EMPLOYEE:SHIERMINA EE: NOMER P.L. DELOS REYES POSITION: VISITING INSTRUCTOR/GUEST LECTURER PART I. PERFORMANCE WEIGHT % Work/Activity Unit of Measure/Indicator TARGETS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS QUANTITY QUALITY TIME Target Accomp. Target Accomp. Target Accomp. 60% 97% 65% 85%
June to October 2012

OFFICE/DIVISION: ZCSPC UNIT:Institute of Technical Education

QN

RATINGS SUPERVISOR QL T APS EPS QN 10

EMPLOYEE QL T APS 8 10 9.33

EPS 6.06

65% I. Actual Teaching A. Efficiency and Effectivity 20% WELDING 15%TECH'L DRAW 101 15% DRAW 101 15%TECH'L DRAW 201 25% II.Lesson Preparation and Student Evaluation A. Lesson/Syllabi Preparation 8% B. Student Evaluation 10% C. Instructional Materials Preparation 7% 10% III. OTHERS A Student Consultation 7% B. Submission of IDP, Grade Sheets, and Syllabi 3% 100%

QN-Number of Students Taught QL-Number of Students Passed T- As required

100%

QN-No. of Lesson prep. QL-Appropriateness T- As sched QN- No. of Students eval.

QL- Appropriateness and Accuracy

June to

70%

90%

60%

97%

October 2012 June to

100%

10

8.67 0.694

65%

93%

70%

95%

October 2012 June to

100%

10

8.67 0.867

T- As sched QN- No. of Students prep. QL- Appropriateness T- As sched QN- No. of Instructional cons. QL- Appropriateness T- As required QN- No. of Instructional mat. QL- Correctness of Entry T-As required

65%

90%

70%

92%

October 2012 June to

100%

10

8.67 0.607

65%

95%

70%

98%

October 2012 June to

100%

10

10

9.33 0.653

65%

100%

70%

100%

October 2012

100%

10

10

10

10

0.3

Total Equivalent Point Score Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation (70%) Weighted Average Score (WAS) Legend: PERC Action: QN - Quantity QL - Quality

9.19 9.19

6.433

WE DISCUSSED AND AGREED ON THE ABOVE TARGETS

MR. NOMER P. DELOS REYES VICTORIA A. VARONA, MATVE Rater Ratee Date

T - Timeliness APS - Average Point Score EPS - Equivalent Point Score

PART II. CRITICAL FACTORS CRITICAL FACTORS 1. COURTESY Polite, kind and thoughtful behaviors toward the public/clientele in manners of speech and actions 10 2. HUMAN RELATIONS Integrates concern for people at work, office clientele, and supervisor-subordinate relationship into work station 3. PUNCTUALITY AND Observed behavior of coming to the office on time or to be ATTENDANCE present at work Sarts action, projects and performs assigned tasks without 4. INITIATIVE being told and under minimal supervision The manner of guiding, influencing, motivating and developing 5. LEADERSHIP confidence of subordinate work as a team and accomplish tasks, leading the organizational unit to achieve its goals and objectives. 6. JUDGMENT/ DECISION Ability to develop alternative solutions to problems, to evaluate MAKING fact or courses of actions, and reach sound decision and readiness to take action or commit oneself. 7. STRESS TOLERANCE Stability of performance under pressure or opposition 8. OTHERS (Specify) Total Point Scores Divide by # Entries Average Point Scores Multiply by Part II Weight (30%) Weighted Average Scores COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RATING SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE RATER Part I 8 10 10 Supervisor Rater Self Rater Subordinate Rater(s) 6.43 2.829 9.259 Part II SUMMARY OF RATINGS Weighted Ave. Scores Overall Point Score Overall Weight Weighted % Scores 55% 25% 2.31

10

Peer Rater(s)

10.0

9.7

19.7

10%

2.0

10 8 66 9.43

Client Rater (s) Total Overall Score Add: Rating on Intervening Task (if any)

10%

FINAL NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING 2.829 EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY

WE DISCUSSED AND AGREED ON THE ABOVE RATINGS

MR. NOMER P. DELOS REYES Rater PERC Action

VICTORIA A. VARONA, MATVE Ratee Confirmed by Next Higher Supervisor

Date