Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LI884XI: Educational Portfolio Metadata Scheme
LI884XI: Educational Portfolio Metadata Scheme
LI884XI: Educational Portfolio Metadata Scheme
Author
Description The name given to the resource. The person or entity responsible for writing or creating the content of the resource.
Encoding
Group Member
Date Due
Date Submitted
A person or entity responsible for contributing to the resource. The date set by the instructor when the resource is officially due. W3CDTF The date the resource was submitted by the Author or a Contributor. W3CDTF A list of units and subunits of content within the resource. The number of points possible; the number of points assigned to the resource by the instructor. The number of points received for completion of the resource. The numerical or alphanumerical grade received upon completion of the assignment. The name of the instructor of the course. Feedback received from the instructor of the course. A summary of the content within the resource. The topic of the content within the resource. LCSH A list of words that can be used for information retrieval purposes. The name given to the project the resource is associated with.
Table of Contents
Possible Points
Points Received
Keywords
Project Title
The name given to the course. The identifing number given to the course. Information about the rights held in and over the resource. The genre of the content within the resource. The digital or physical manifestation of the resource itself. The physical or digital location of the resource. The language of the content within the resource. A reference to the resource.
URI DCMIType
IMT URI
Language Identifer
Title
Author
Group Member
Date Due
The effects of the internet and open access on the usage of grey literature: Magnifico, Christina a review of the literature
2013_08_07
Collection management policy analysis report: A.R. Dykes Health Sciences Magnifico, Christina Library
2013_10_06
Magnifico, Christina
2013_06_30
Magnifico, Christina
2013_08_04
Magnifico, Christina
2013_03_23
Date Submitted
Table of Contents
Possible Points
Points Received
Grade Received
2013_08_02
400 371/400
2013_10_06
="List of Figures; Executive Summary; H8Introduction; Policy analysis overview; Purpose, description, and statement; Selection tools and evaluation criteria; Collection management issues; Conclusion; References; Appendix A: Collectiing levels chart"
10 010/010
2013_06_30
5 005/005
2013_08_04
15 15/15
2013_03_20
30 30/30
Instructor
Tuai, Cameron
Instructor Comments A good paper. Your selection of research materials and its use to support your research question was string. The paper's question were clearly stated, though better selection of terms and increased precision in stating questions would have improved clarity. Greater discussion of the methods used in the research was needed. Marginal issues in formatting. Word count could have been better managed if summaries of the research was used instead of direct quotes. Do contact me if you wish to talk further about your paper. See rubric and attached paper for additional comments.
You did a good job addressing all of the learning objectives associated with the assignment. Best Executive Summary Award! 010/010 Define the characteristics of a written collection development policy relevant to the policy you assess. 010/010 Assess the value of the policy to the information collection 010/010 Discuss the challenges to implementation of the policy 010/010 Report is written clearly and succinctly using correct grammar, spelling, and puntuation 05/05 Report is presented in the appropriate format. 05/05 Overall quality of performance on the assignment 50/05= 10
Capps, Janet
Sutton, Sarah
Sutton, Sarah
Outstanding work Christina, you can be very proud of this piece. I've made a few comments in the rubric (attached). I didn't take off any points for being late since you missed midnight by 13 seconds!
Dow, Mirah
Abstract This paper looks at the validity, usability, and reliability of grey literature in light of increased access due to digital technologies. Many researchers have evaluated usage of grey literature using webometrics, citation analysis, and bibliometrics. This paper also briefly defines grey literature and provides examples of types of grey literature archives within the academic community. The studies in this paper show that the usage of grey literature in academic publishing has remained stagnant even though access to it has increased. It also discusses the perceived validity of grey literature within the acadmic community and the reliability of grey literature repositories.
Subject
Keywords
gray literature; grey literature; printed ephemera; open access; digital ephemera
This report provides an in-depth analysis of the A.R. Dykes Health Sciences Library collection development and management policy. Based on an exhaustive review of the collection management policy, this report concludes that the A.R. Dykes Health Sciences Library needs to include the mission statement of th eLibrary along with the mission statement of the University of Kansas Medical Center. The collection management polict also needs to include the disaster recovery plan, the Library schedule for policy review and a more in-depth statement regarding collaboration between the Library collection development team and the faculty of the University of Kansas Medical Center. Overall, this report shows that while the policy is quite comprehensive there is room for improvement.
Collection development (Libraries); Collection development (Libraries)-Evaluation; Collection development (Libraries)--Policy statements
collection development; collection management; library policy; health sciences library; medical library
This annotated list of themes includes the evaluation of medical information retrieval systems, health professionals use of medical information retrieval systems, and performing search queries in medical information retrieval systems.
This paper contains a review of the medical and information science literature with a focus on the evaluation, usage, and search techniques within medical information retrieval systems. The review provides a detailed methodology of the search process used for the collection of the articles, so that the results can be replicated. This review shows that, although there are not currently set standards by which medical information retrieval systems are evaluated; the usage of electronic systems is on the rise, showing a need for query instruction. It also identifies several current trends within information retrieval system research and areas to be improved upon.
This newsletter was created as part of a larger Information Ethics Case assignment. It contains articles written from the point-of-view of fake library patrons, editors and concerned citizens regarding intellectual freedom.
Project Title
Course Title
Course Number
Copyright
LI810XS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ us/
Policy Analysis
LI855XS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ us/
Literature Review
Organization of Information
LI804XS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ us/
Literature Review
Organization of Information
LI804XS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ us/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ us/
Resource Type
Digital Format
Location
Language
text
application/msword
http://www.scribd.com/
en
text
application/msword
http://www.scribd.com/
en
text
application/msword
http://www.scribd.com/
en
text
application/msword
http://www.scribd.com/
en
text
application/mspublisher
http://www.scribd.com/
en
Identifier
http://www.scribd.com/doc/163740640/TheEffects-of-the-Internet-and-Open-Access-onthe-Usage-of-Grey-Literature-A-Review-of-theLiterature-Group-Project
http://www.scribd.com/doc/179668238/Colle ction-Management-Policy-Analysis-ReportLI855XS
http://www.scribd.com/doc/163739320/Anno tated-List-of-Themes-Medical-InformationRetrieval-Systems
http://www.scribd.com/doc/163740134/TheUse-of-Medical-Information-Retrieval-Systems
http://www.scribd.com/doc/131421274/Intell ectual-Freedom-Newsletter
Local Scheme
Dublin Core
Implementation Notes Only capitalize the first letter of the title (ex: Random research assignment). Last name first, first name last (Magnifico, Christina). Identify each contributor with a new field. YYYY-MM-DD YYYY-MM-DD Capitalize each subunit within the table of contents (ex: tableOfContents="Chapter one; Chapter 2; Chapter 3). Use format --/-- (ex, 10/10; 9/10). Use format --/-- (ex, 10/10; 9/10). Use alphanumeric format (ex: 10, A, C). Last name first, first name last (Magnifico, Christina). Copy comments exactly as received. Use abstract from document. If not available, create description. Utilize LCSH Subject Keywords Utilize keyword tags to aid in information retrieval. Only capitalize the first letter of the title (ex: Random research assignment). Only capitalize the first letter of the title (ex: Introduction to libraries). Use format: LI000X- (ex: LI884XI, LI802XS) Creative Commons License unless otheriwse noted. Utilize DCMIType encoding. Utilize IMT encoding.
Table of Contents Possible Points Points Received Grade Received Instructor Instructor Comments
tableOfContents
Project Title
isPartOf
Location Language
Description Language
Use location of final project (ex: Blackboard, Emporia State University, Scribd) Utilize ISO 639 (ex: en) If available via URI, include URI (ex: http://www.scribd.com/doc/1 31421891/Roles-ofInformation-Professionals)
Identifier
Identifier