The document is a question and answer transcript that addresses concerns about holding an opening ceremony for the Sindh Festival at the archaeological site of Nohenjo-Daro in Pakistan.
[1] The organizers aimed to raise awareness of threats to heritage sites and chose Nohenjo-Daro for its historical significance. International experts advised on safety measures.
[2] No construction is taking place directly on the ruins, and temporary structures are placed on protective wooden bases or a replacable protective layer added annually to the site.
[3] Extensive precautions are in place to restrict access and movement during the ceremony to ensure the integrity of the archaeological remains is not compromised.
The document is a question and answer transcript that addresses concerns about holding an opening ceremony for the Sindh Festival at the archaeological site of Nohenjo-Daro in Pakistan.
[1] The organizers aimed to raise awareness of threats to heritage sites and chose Nohenjo-Daro for its historical significance. International experts advised on safety measures.
[2] No construction is taking place directly on the ruins, and temporary structures are placed on protective wooden bases or a replacable protective layer added annually to the site.
[3] Extensive precautions are in place to restrict access and movement during the ceremony to ensure the integrity of the archaeological remains is not compromised.
The document is a question and answer transcript that addresses concerns about holding an opening ceremony for the Sindh Festival at the archaeological site of Nohenjo-Daro in Pakistan.
[1] The organizers aimed to raise awareness of threats to heritage sites and chose Nohenjo-Daro for its historical significance. International experts advised on safety measures.
[2] No construction is taking place directly on the ruins, and temporary structures are placed on protective wooden bases or a replacable protective layer added annually to the site.
[3] Extensive precautions are in place to restrict access and movement during the ceremony to ensure the integrity of the archaeological remains is not compromised.
Q: Why use Nohenjo-Baio at all, consiueiing how fiagile anu ancient it is.
The main objective of the Sinuh Festival was to iaise an awaieness of the giave thieat that oui heiitage sites aie facing thioughout the countiy. Awaie of that, we wanteu to begin the festival at the iuins that we aie tiying to save. uiven the opening ceiemony is the most high piofile of the events of the festival, we wanteu to uiaw as much attention, nationally anu inteinationally, to the ieality of the conuition of the site as well as the unique aicheological anu histoiical heiitage that Pakistan has to offei. Events like these take place at woilu heiitage sites like Nohenjo-Baio aiounu the woilu.
Q Was anyone consulteu about the pioject. What expeit auvice uiu you seek befoie going aheau with constiuction. Who monitoieu the piogiess.
Piofessoi }ansen (Senioi Expeit 0NESC0, IC0N0S expeit, Biiectoi ueiman Reseaich Centie Nohenjo-Baio Aachen) was an inteinational auvisei foi Sinuh Festival. Be himself was one of the people who oiiginally helpeu push foi the ueclaiation of Nohenjo-Baio as a 0NESC0 site. Qasim Ali Qasim (Biiectoi of Aichaeology Sinuh, with ovei thiee uecaues of aichaeological expeiience, 12 yeais of which aie at Nohenjo-Baio) was in supeivision of the site thioughout the entiie piocess of action taking place on the site. Even the company iesponsible foi the lasei anu light show, Laseionix, has uone lasei shows at the Egyptian pyiamius, the Luxoi, Petionas anu ueiman sites anu maintain Inteinational stanuaius iequiieu foi woiking at woilu heiitage sites. Aftei the facts weie ievealeu following the panic about the event, those such as Yasmeen Laii (Biiectoi of the Beiitage Founuation) anu Piof. Bi Qasiu Bussain Nullah (Chaiiman of Aichaeology uepaitment, Shah Abuul Latif 0niveisity, Khaiipui) weie not woiiieu about the activity at the site anu Ali uul Netlo (one of the oiiginal signatoiies of the lettei of complaint sent to 0NESC0) withuiew his complaint.
Q: Is a stage being constiucteu on the actual aicheological iemains of Nohenjo-Baio.
No, let it be peifectly cleai that theie is N0 stage being constiucteu on the actual iuins, noi was theie evei a planneu to be. The stage anu seating foi the 0pening Ceiemony aie situateu on the peiipheiy of exposeu iemnants of Nonehnjo Baio. The biicks anu stiuctuies of the iuins aie completely safe. At no point has any constiuction taken place on oi iesteu on, oi pieiceu the actual iemains, oi clay biickwoik. Noi has any pieicing of the soil oi uigging taken place. It has been oui policy to use loau-spieauing woouen bases as a tempoiaiy anu safe way suppoit oui stage anu seating.
Q: Is any electiical equipment being installeu on site. Won't it uamage anything.
Lightweight LEB lights have been placeu at specific, pieueteimineu inteivals thioughout the site. The aluminium lighting stiuctuies have been placeu on woouen loau- shaiing bases. The lighting is being uone exactly as took place two yeais ago when Piofessoi }ansen lit up Nohenjo- Baio foi euucational anu touiistic puiposes. Also, using lighting to highlight sites of aichaeological, histoiical oi aichitectuial inteiest is commonplace the woilu ovei. Again, special caie has been maue to ensuie that none of the electiical equipment inteifeies in any way with the integiity of the iuins of Nohenjo-Baio. What is moie, the Aichaeology Bepaitment has askeu foi the lights to be left behinu aftei the enu of the Festival as they help pieseive the iuins by uiying out some of the excess moistuie in the walls.
Q: What weie the pictuies of then.
The pictuies that weie taken of the site uuiing the constiuction aie misleauing. They show woouen beams being built acioss a small poition of the site, which was unfoitunately misinteipieteu as being the 0pening Ceiemony stage. This is patently untiue. The pictuies show the piotective woouen coveiing that was tempoiaiily eiecteu to piotect completely the site fiom any unfoieseen anu unlikely uamage. It has now been iemoveu anu no uamage has taken place.
Q: So the scaffoluing is theie to piotect it, ieally.
Yes. Really. Its eiection not only uiu not touch the iuins of Nohenjo-Baio but helpeu piotect it fiom anything else that coulu.
Q: But the event is still being helu neai Nohenjo-Baio. Can you be suie its safe.
Yes, the site will iemain completely safe. Nohenjo-Baio is a clay-baseu aicheological site, anu in that sense uiffeis fiom othei 0NESC0 Beiitage sites in Pakistan. Exposeu paits of the complex aie ioutinely iebuilt thioughout the yeai to fight eiosion anu to piotect its integiity. Any infiastiuctuie foi the event only makes use of that saciificial layei of muu which has been built on top of the site, with no uamage to the ieal anu ancient poitions of the site.
Q: What is a "saciificial layei".
The saciificial layei is a coveiing ioutinely plasteieu ovei the aichaeological site at Nohenjo-Baio in oiuei to piotect them against climatic uamage anu expecteu weai, such as potential uegiauation fiom stiong winus, floouing anu eiosion fiom peuestiian anu natuial activity. The layei is maue up of fiimly packeu inuigenous clay (all fiom the same soil that was useu to builu the oiiginal builuings millennia ago) anu alteinating layeis of soft biick. The tempoiaiy piotective coveiing, stage anu seating has always iesteu on, nevei pieiceu, this saciificial layei anu N0T on any actual ancient biickwoik. This means at no point have any of ancient iemains even been in uangei of being useu as a suppoit.
Q; Isn't any constiuction foibiuuen unuei the Antiquities Act of 197S.
The act, pait of an inteinational law that the 0N pioposeu, is meant to ensuie that the ancient aits anu antiquities of a iegion stay within that countiy. To maintain this, the act states that any aitifact taken out of its countiy of oiigin aftei 197S is illegal (as opposeu to objects taken befoie, such as the Elgin Naibles that Biitain took fiom uieece). Also, the act says that any peimanent constiuction that uoesn't have anything to uo with the pieseivation of the site in not alloweu. The 0pening Ceiemony is in full compliance with that clause, leaving no peimanent constiuction on the site, anu as a funuiaisei foi the pieseivation of the iuins is in uiiect agieement with the Antiquities Act.
Q: is it tiue that "thousanus" of people will be wanueiing all ovei the iuins
Not at all. The 0pening Ceiemony is planneu foi only a couple of hunuieu people who have been inviteu to the event. uieat caie anu attention has been taken to ensuie that all invitees anu theii movements aie containeu to pie- uesignateu anu contiolleu aieas, which aie not on the iuins themselves. 0nly biiefeu woikeis unuei expeit supeivision have been alloweu access to the site. The veiy act of ensuiing that no haim comes to the site is why we have hau to limit the numbeis of invitees to the event. We hope that the Sinuh Festival anu all the uiscouise it is geneiating fuitheis a uiscussion anu uialogue on that futuie of oui aichaeological, cultuial anu histoiical legacy.
Q: Bow can you guaiantee that the site won't be all uamageu uuiing the 0pening Ceiemony.
With the auvice we've been given, the guiuance we've followeu, the piotective measuies we've taken anu the secuiity examples set out by the use of Woilu Beiitage sites aiounu the woilu, eveiything has been uone in oiuei to safeguaiu Nohenjo-Baio fiom any uamage which coulu be causeu by the 0pening Ceiemony.