Professional Documents
Culture Documents
APC Notes
APC Notes
Air Pollution Control by Dr. Dennis Y.C. Leung Department of Mechanical Engineering Course Co-ordinator
determine which substances should be limited, and to what extent they should be limited, determine the effects of each substance on health, damage to property & esthetic values, find out the interaction of different pollutant substances etc.
This can further be classified into 2 categories: a. Long term control b. Short- term control
LONG-TERM CONTROL: involves a legislated set of measures to be adopted over a multi-year period
Figure 1
Long-term control
Short-term control
Rescheduling of activities
Rescheduling of activities
Requirements for long-term planning Air quality objective Airshed model Survey of control techniques and costs Meteorological probabilities
Requirements for real-time control Air quality objective Dynamic model Rapid communications Strict enforcement of measures
SHORT-TERM CONTROL (episode control): involves shutdown & slowdown procedures that are adopted over periods of several hours to several days under adverse meteorological conditions
Prediction simulation Alert level Emission standards Emergency Control procedures Emission standard enforcement Stack monitoring system Automatic air monitoring network Air quality Atmosphere Emission sources
What considerations should be taken when selecting air pollution control equipment?
1.
Environmental
Ambient conditions Maximum allowable emissions (emission standard) Contribution of APC system to wastewater, land pollution and noise pollution problems Aesthetic considerations (visible steam etc.)
An incincerator in Austria
2.
Engineering
Contaminant characteristics Gas stream characteristics Design & performance characteristics of the particular control system
3.
Economic
Capital cost (equipment, installation, engineering, etc.) Operation cost (utilities, maintenance, etc.) Expected equipment lifetime and salvage value
The final choice of equipment is usually dictated by that equipment capable of achieving compliance with regulatory codes at the lowest cost (total cost include capital cost, maintenance and operation costs).
Advantages
- High removal efficiency (>99%) for coarse and fine particulate - Very small particles can be collected - Dry dusts can be collected for recovery of valuable material (e.g. fly ash) - Small pressure and temperature drops - Designed to operate continuously with little maintenance over long periods of time
- Few moving parts reduce maintenance - Can be used at high temp. (700C) & high pressure (<150 psi) - Can be used to collect acid and tar mists which are difficult to be removed by other methods - Can handle very large gas flow rates (> 2 x 106 m3/hr) - Low power consumption and hence low operating cost
Disadvantages
- High capital cost - Not easily adaptable to variable condition (i.e. flows, temp., particulate loadings) - Some particles with extremely high or low resistivity are very difficult to be collected
Application area
Incinerator, utility boiler, furnaces, refineries, smelters, paper mills, small household air-conditioning system
A typical baghouse
Advantages
- Extremely high collection eff. on both coarse and fine particulates (> 99.9%) - Collected dust is recovered dry for subsequent processing/disposal
Disadvantages
- Temp. > 300C require special refractory mineral or metallic fabrics that are still in the developmental stage - Conc. of some dusts in the collector (~59 g/m3) may cause explosion hazard if a spark or flame is admitted by accident. Fabrics can burn if readily oxidizable dust is being collected
Application area
Vacuum cleaner, air conditioning system, ash and material handling plant, power plant, cement plant, etc.