Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JPT2002 11 HW Focus
JPT2002 11 HW Focus
Horizontal-technology development is evolving from a leading-edge high-risk exercise to a normal operating day-to-day practice that recovers additional reserves. This years selected papers are examples of innovative approaches that exploit and fine-tune the technology. It is clear that we are quickly evolving the use of horizontal technology to improve economic parameters associated with the production from our fields. The number of related technologies developed as a result of the industrys ability to complete horizontal and multilateral wells successfully is amazing. Selection of the most appropriate development strategy is a complicated process requiring not only the economic consideration of the technical parameters of the reservoir and the production process, but many other considerations as well. Today, industry professionals who develop these plans are in the enviable position of having an almost unlimited wellbore-architecture capability. As an industry, it is important that we continue to understand, improve, and enhance the use of this technology to improve recovery. Aspects of our business, such as technology development, require ongoing commitment. High-quality research and development is ongoing within several organizations. One of our industrys biggest challenges is accessing technological developments to create even better horizontal drilling processes. Industry associations, such as SPE, play a valuable role in collecting and sharing this information. Organizations that embody this focus of technology development are bound to be JPT more successful in the long term.
H o r i z o n t a l We l l s
36
Lew A. Hayes is Vice President of Operations at Petrovera Resources Ltd. He has been involved with more than 400 horizontal wells, including several vertical and horizontal multilateral completions; copatented a multilateral system; and is coauthor of several papers related to new technology developments. Hayes holds a BS degree in petroleum engineering from Montana Tech. He has worked extensively in Canada with east coast offshore experience; a full range of heavy-oil developments including steamassisted gravity drainage; and the deep sour drilling and completions in the foothills. A member of SPE for 20 years, Hayes serves on the JPT Editorial Committee.
NOVEMBER 2002
H o r i z o n t a l We l l s
37
Fluid Invasion Drilling-fluid invasion occurs when the drill bit contacts the reservoir rock and a rapid mud invasion (spurt loss) occurs because no filter cake exists to prevent entry of solid particles from the mud into the pay zone. During this period, progressive deposition of these particles creates an internal filter cake. When this internal filter cake is well established, most of the solid particles are retained outside the formation, generally creating a thin external filter cake that controls the rate of filtrate invasion. As shown in Fig. 1, a steady-state flow regime, characterized by a constant filtrate-invasion rate and a constant filter-cake thickness, is generally observed. This dynamic equilibrium results from the prevention of particle deposition because of the shearing effect of the drilling fluid. The start of the dynamic equilibrium corresponds to the end of the spurt period and the beginning of dynamic invasion. The fluid losses during the spurt and filtration periods can be obtained from laboratory tests. In this study, a transition period is not specified, and the spurt loss measured in the laboratory takes into account the filtrate invasion during the transition period. At the end of the spurt period, an internal filter cake is com-
NOVEMBER 2002
pletely built. During The mathematical model dynamic invasion, it was and numerical methods assumed that neither are detailed in the fullabsolute permeability in length paper. the formation nor external filter-cake properties, if Conclusions any, changed. Damaged A numerical model was permeability in the zone developed that simulates occupied by the internal both near-well formation cake as well as properties damage and natural in external cake (cake cleanup during the drilling thickness and its permeand flowback production of ability) can be measured in a horizontal well drilled laboratory tests. With with WBM. The model these data, filtrate invasion requires knowledge of percan be simulated with a meability reduction in the two-phase flow simulator particle-invaded zone and restricted by bottomhole the final return permeabiliflowing pressure. ty after flowback. It also Fig. 1Drilling-fluid invasion and filter-cake formation. After drilling is completrequires knowledge of the ed and before the well is reservoir oil-/mud-filtrate put on production, filtrate relative permeability curves invasion may continue under static ous water-based formulations of for- for both the drilling phase and the conditions if an overbalanced pressure mation-damage and filter-cake flowback production. The model can be used to investiis maintained. During this static inva- removal procedures by use of different sion, the thickness of the external cake drawdown pressures applied to a hor- gate the influence of many parameters increases because of the absence of izontal well drilled in a heterogeneous on the flow efficiency of a horizontal shear stress, thus reducing the filtrate formation. Cylindrical gridblocks are well after drilling and cleanup. invasion compared with other periods. used for the simulation with small Together with laboratory data necesgridblock sizes near the well. Filter sary to provide the main input data for Oil Flowback cakes are discretized along their thick- specific applications, this model can Various techniques are used to ness to obtain a better description of be used as a predictive tool to evaluate remove filter cake, including breakers the initial damage and the removal and limit the risks of formation damsuch as acid or an oxidizing solution. phenomena. Sensitivity to various age and maintain the maximum proIn this study, only natural cleanup parameters, such as fluid and filter- ductivity of a well. (pressure difference applied between cake properties or drilling conditions, In examples run with laboratory the reservoir and the wellbore) is con- on the damage and removal processes data, formation damage and consecusidered for removing the filter cake. was studied. tive productivity reduction are much When this pressure difference is large Numerical modeling involves two greater with WBM than with OBM. enough, external cake can be lifted off steps. First, filtrate invasion during Serious loss of production can occur and flow initialized to remove parti- drilling is modeled. Second, the natur- with the use of damaging and nonopcles in the zone occupied by the inter- al cleanup of the filtrate cake during timized drilling fluid. Investigated nal cake. Two regions can be distin- the flowback period is modeled. parameters include the most influenguished regarding the oil-return-perA two-phase-flow reservoir-simula- tial for a well drilled with WBM: the meability variations. The first region tion model was used to evaluate fil- value of the endpoint of oil relative is close to the wellbore wall, where the trate invasion during the drilling permeability during drainage. regained permeability is the combined stage as well as filter-cake removal The model remains simple, aleffect of partial removal of solids par- during production. A two-phase-flow though it incorporates most of the ticles and reduction of filtrate satura- model had already been used to sim- knowledge acquired on formation tion. The second region is far from the ulate filtrate invasion to improve log damage from up-to-date laboratory wall, where only the filtrate saturation interpretation; however, well perfor- data. However, it must be improved reduction is considered because parti- mance was not studied. In the past, by taking into account laboratory cle deposits are assumed negligible. productivity change was related to work (such as the effect of local Therefore, for the cleanup process, it formation damage by use of nonuni- velocity), which may affect the can be assumed that potential damage form skin along the well. However, amount of filter-cake removal and from polymers contained in the fil- no laboratory data were integrated to water blocking on cleanup efficiency. trate is globally represented by a hys- evaluate filtrate invasion. The objec- This model also must be improved by teresis of filtrate/oil relative perme- tive of this approach was to evaluate integrating more general reservoirability curves. well performance by including labo- boundary capabilities, effect of ratory data. Therefore, permeability anisotropy, and, if possible, coupling Numerical Model in the zone occupied by filter cake with a geomechanical model to invesThe full-length paper details the was assumed known from laboratory tigate sand production in poorly conJPT model and presents examples of vari- testing for each geological facies. solidated reservoirs.
H o r i z o n t a l We l l s
38
NOVEMBER 2002
(i.e., each layer has its own characteristics and short horizontal bores). Decreased sweep efficiency in a layered reservoir is the result of both a decrease in the length of the horizontal section and the asymmetry of the horizontal section in filtration elements. Such a process was observed in all systems having horizontal and vertical wells. The one exception was a line-drive system having only horizontal wells. In this case, deformation of the well pattern does not take place. Conclusions As reservoir vertical permeability anisotropy increases, the productivity of a given development system can decrease in multiples. However, if the reservoir is thin, as in most sheet oil pools, the difference between the horizontal-well rate and perfect surrounding-well rate does not exceed 5%. Increasing the horizontal-well length by more than 50 to 60% of the distance between wells in verticalinjector patterns, or by more than 90% in horizontal-injector patterns, does not significantly influence the
This article, written by Technology Editor Dennis Denney, contains highlights of paper SPE 77827, Influence of the Horizontal-Well Length on Production Rate and Water Cut Performance in Regular FieldDevelopment Systems With Horizontal Wells, by I.R. Mukminov, Yukos Oil Co., originally presented at the 2002 SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne, Australia, 810 October. For a limited time, the full-length paper is available free to SPE members at www.spe.org/jpt. The paper has not been peer reviewed.
H o r i z o n t a l We l l s
productivity of the development systems. Under equal conditions, systems with a staggered well pattern exhibit water-free oil recovery up to 40% greater than systems with a direct well pattern. For well patterns with frontal placement of horizontal and vertical wells, the increase in horizontal-bore length leads to the increase in water-free oil recovery; however, in staggered-well-pattern systems, the growth of the horizontal-well length is accompanied by a reduction in water-free oil recovery. In a five-spot system with four-bore horizontal producers (Case 6), the relationship between horizontal-well length and water-free oil recovery is nonlinear. Horizontal-well length of 30 to 50% of the crosswell distance provides the greatest water-free oil recovery. Longer or shorter horizontal sections reduce water-free production. Systems with frontal location wells have a much longer water-production period, compared with the staggeredwell pattern, because the dynamics of water-cut are less favorable. In systems with a staggered-well pattern, changing the horizontal-well length does not significantly influence the well operation in the water-production period because the water-cut and floodingfactor curves vary in a much smaller range than in frontal systems. JPT
If there is more than 2.5 m between laterals, the lower lateral will be drilled followed by installation of one MLR nipple, an inflatable packer for isolation, and a second orientation riser. The second or uppermost lateral will then be drilled. The second MLR nipple will be oriented to the second upper lateral and run with a conventional through-tubing completion tied back to the casing string. If existing geology permits the lower-lateral build rates not to exceed 40/30 m, a 41/2-in. slotted liner will be run and tied back to the vertical wellbore with an inflatable packer and orientation riser. The upper lateral will be drilled and one MLR nipple installed for the upper lateral and run with a conventional through-tubing completion tied back to the casing string. Later Installations. In later installations, the lower lateral was drilled succesfully off a cement plug, reducing overall costs of the complete system. A 41/2-in. liner was tied back to the openhole main bore with an inflatable packer to provide the drilling and completion anchor for the upper lateral. The tieback liner provides formation support in the lower lateral. The upper lateral is drilled and completed in the same manner as before, with an MLR window placed acrosss the upper exit and a liner dropped off in the lateral just outside the window. Either a polished bore recepticle (PBR) or an inflatable
41 NOVEMBER 2002
H o r i z o n t a l We l l s
packer and PBR are on the end of the liner just outside the window to enable easier re-entry and isolation, if needed. A more advanced solution is to allow the upper leg also to have a liner tied back to the main bore to provide formation support on the upper junction. This tieback liner has a premilled window in the liner that is oriented and aligned to allow tool or production access to the main bore below the top junction. This is typical of a Level 3 system that is applied to a hard-formation open hole. Both legs provide risk-free re-entry, mechanical stability in the junction, and, with appropriate nipple profiles installed, provide the means to shut off or choke back either of the production legs. Operational Issues and Solutions Milling/Drilling. Starting a pathway is difficult in hard formations, and rate of penetration (ROP) is slow. A series of special tungsten insert mills, that cut a short pilot hole quickly and effectively to provide direction and pathway for the diamond bit to begin drilling past the top of whipstock for the initial sidetrack, were developed and tested. In the past, it was not uncommon to make two to three mill or bit runs to create a short kickoff hole past the whipstock tip. In addition, the milling/drilling action usually damaged the whipstock tip so that it had to be retrieved and replaced to complete the build and lateral. Different mill designs were evaluated to determine an optimum design that would cut in a radial fashion. After some field testing, the final mill design would enable a 50-cm cutout with no damage to the whipstock top. Experimentation showed that ROP could be improved with a bit design that used a crushing action. For the Upper Cambrian, the most successful bits for ROP were an Intl. Assn. of Drilling Contractors 837, a tricone insert bit with heavy gauge protection. Average ROP in the horizontal section was 2.9 m/hr with a 250-RPM motor; average bit life was approximately 30 hr. Sidetracks off the whipstock used a diamond bit at 1- to 1.5-m/hr ROP . A natural diamond bit was used to complete the sidetrack and rat hole, and a tricone bit was used to drill the lateral. Isolation/Anchors. Issues had to be addressed to obtain a suitable anchor
42
H o r i z o n t a l We l l s
to ensure low-risk milling/drilling operations and to prevent misalignment or realignment of tools relative to the lateral in later operations. Use of a combination of cased- and openhole-completion products provided a basis for drilling the lateral and tying the production string back to the original cased hole. Initially, a mechanical shear-release latch system was used to run the lower anchor system consisting of a centralized tailpipe, shoe, collar, and inflatable packer with orientation riser. Improvements led to the use of a hybrid hydraulic-release linerhanger setting tool and setting-sleeve orientation riser that provided a lower-risk cementing operation and ensured quick and positive runningtool release before cement setting. Milling/drilling of inflatable packers in openhole hard formations has not caused any problems. The hydraulicrelease tool has required some refinements to provide more clearance during running and retrieving and to isolate internal components from cement contamination. Other modifications have been made to improve procedural processes to enable high-load latching and unlatching during space out of the tubing string. Initial installations used inflatable packers for isolation and anchors for both lateral legs. Lower inflatable packers usually were cement inflated, and upper inflatable packers were liquid inflated. Later and current installations use a liquid inflatable packer for the top lateral, but the lower lateral now is drilled off a cement plug. Drilling off a cement plug is effective for the short-radius build and is more cost effective. Re-entry. Through-tubing selective re-entry into lateral bores associated with Level 4 cased multilateral wells is proven technology. The challenge was to adapt this technology for use with Level 1 openhole multilaterals and ensure that the equipment and techniques used provided a cost-effective and low-risk solution. The thin reservoir sections dictated closely spaced laterals, requiring varied completion schemes and more complexity in aligning re-entry components. For future re-entry of openhole completions, large tubing completions with large-bore MLR nipples provide greater producing capabilities with additional flexibility for workover
operations in the laterals. Just like conventional completion engineering and design, re-entry wellbore completion tubulars should be no smaller than the completion tubing for workover flexibility. The MLR system used in these wells uses selective profiles to provide optimum completion inside diameter. MLR System. The MLR nipple system is a sleeve that is installed in the well as part of the completion and is positioned adjacent to the drilled lateral exit from the main bore. The MLR nipples provide selective access for intervention tools to monitor and manage the lateral bores without the need to pull the completion string to work over the well. To accommodate the close tolerances required to position the MLR nipple, careful and accurate measurments were taken during drilling the lateral bores. The collet orientation latch used for drilling provides depth and orientation data for both lateral wellbores. A quick and simple alignment method was devised to enable rigsite lower completion assembly makeup. A simple acme-type thread connection that could be adjusted on site and locked in position was used that also could provide close coupling of the MLR nipples, if required. By careful equipment selection, it is possible to identify and selectively exit MLR nipples as little as 1.5 m apart. The MLR nipple assembly, designed with a 53/4-in. maximum diameter with reduced relief diameters to accommodate debris, was easily deployed in the 57/8- or 6-in. diameter openhole main bore. A 41/2-in. upper completion with 33/4-in. selective nipple profiles was chosen to accommodate the intervention tools. MLR nipple systems have been used succesfully in dozens of installations. Conclusions Proper planning and implementation of dual openhole laterals in the ultra-abrasive Cambrian formation in Algeria has led to improved project timetables and lower project costs. Milling and drilling off cemented inflatable packers in openhole applications into extremely hard formations, accurate repeatable alignment of lateral re-entry completion components, and completion tieback to the original wellbore have become routine processes. JPT
NOVEMBER 2002
H o r i z o n t a l We l l s
Introduction and Background The Dan/Halfdan oil field is approximately 149 miles off the west coast of Denmark in the North Sea. Oil production from the Dan field began in 1972. The 29,600-ft-long Well MFF19C, with a horizontal reservoir section of 20,749 ft, followed the oil accumulation more than 700 ft downdip from the main field and below the structural saddle point. This action led to the discovery of a 1.5-billion-STB, nonstructurally trapped oil accumulation, the Halfdan field. Reservoir Description The Dan/Halfdan field comprises chalk reservoirs of Danian and Maastrichtian age. Development focuses on the Maastrichtian reservoir, which is characterized by relatively high porosity (25 to 35%) and low liquid permeability (0.1 to 2 md). The bottom part of the Danian, the D2 unit, exhibits relatively low porosities and very low permeabilities. A zone having extremely poor permeability separates the Danian and Maastrichtian formations. Properties of the chalk vary on a 3- to 7-ft scale, reflecting depositional cycles, which can be recognized over long distances in the lateral sense. Each cycle consists of a high and low porosity interval, causing the significant vertical porosity variations.
tion pressure drop along the liner section (i.e., the average hole spacing decreases toward the bottom of the liner). The open annulus outside the liner, in combination with the overpressure on the inside of the liner (caused by the choking over the holes), ensures that acid eventually reaches the bottom of the very long liner, and the well is thus stimulated along its full length. The initial flow distribution along the uncemented liner is shown in Fig. 1. Initially, both the liner and liner/wellbore annulus are filled with mud. Also, a high resistance to flow exists at the wellbore face (mud cake). When the acid first contacts the formation on top of the liner, the mud cake and formation break down and considerable volumes start leaking off to the formation. Hence, as soon as an effective connection to the reservoir has been established, the stimulation pressure will fall, assuming constant stimulation rates. At this stage of the stimulation job, the fluid leakoff into the top of the reservoir section is a mixture of acid jetting out of the predrilled liner holes in the top section and fluids flowing from the more distant part of the liner annulus in the direction of the heel. As the acid front moves along the liner, a breakdown zone is created in which acid mixes with the mud and breaks down the mud and the mudcake.
44 NOVEMBER 2002
Fig. 1Conceptual outline of fluid flow during stimulation through a CAJ liner. AInitial large leakoff at the heel of the well. BThe mud is displaced, and the breakdown zone moves toward the toe of the well. CThe mud and mudcake have been removed completely, and stimulation of the entire liner is ongoing.
Eventually, when all the mud is broken down and residuals displaced into the formation, the annulus will be fully filled with acid. A net flow toward the sections with the lowest skin in the well will continue, and the acid flowing toward these sections will wash the wellbore face. Fresh acid will continue to be jetted at the predetermined distribution points along the uncemented liner, ensuring effective stimulation along the full liner length by acid flow in the annulus. Single zones as long as 14,400 ft have been treated effectively with the technique. For comparison, experience with a traditional cemented and perforated liner has shown a maximum zone length of 500 to 700 ft if the sliding sleeve is placed at the middle of the perforation interval and if the reservoir properties are nearly constant. Conclusions The CAJ completion and stimulation technique was developed and implemented for the development of the flank areas of the Dan/Halfdan low-permeability chalk field offshore Denmark.
The uncemented-liner completion and stimulation technique is efficient and simple to install. In addition, substantial cost and time reductions have been achieved. The technique enables single-operation stimulation of reservoir intervals longer than 14,000 ft. Full acid coverage is obtained throughout the entire liner section. The production performance per unit length of well is superior to the conventional acid fracture and/or matrixacid-stimulated cemented liners. The stimulation effect is confined to the near-wellbore area. No additional water production from the deeper water-saturated reservoir units has been observed. No significant additional skin is introduced by the completion, despite the very limited number of predrilled holes in the liner and the bull heading of the drilling mud into the formation. No significant solids production or indications of collapse of the open hole have been observed in sections completed with the CAJ liner. JPT
45 NOVEMBER 2002
H o r i z o n t a l We l l s