Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LLM v10 Final 2 Reconsideration of Order Jan 31, 2014 Feb 9, 2014 Rich Text1
LLM v10 Final 2 Reconsideration of Order Jan 31, 2014 Feb 9, 2014 Rich Text1
LLM v10 Final 2 Reconsideration of Order Jan 31, 2014 Feb 9, 2014 Rich Text1
15 West Spring Street Alex n!ri " #irgini $$%&1 '(gren !ier)g* il+,-* $&$.%/0.1110
ROBIN/RACHEAL GRENADIER
Tel A4i4 Isr el A!!ress 7n:-(n RL;RENNIE)<AHOO+COM
LORETTA LAX MILLER !"!# LEAH LAX !"!# MUGGY CAT !"!# BILLY SULLI$AN Pres%&e'(%!) C!'&%&!(e *or +,-. C!/0!%1' He!&23!r(ers
%5& M r:et Street Hig6spire" 2A 11%&5 in3-)L-rett Miller52resi!ent+,-*
EMER;ENC< RECONDIDERATION OF ORDER ? n %1" $&15 5 Re@7est 3r-* 2l inti33 t- Ae 6e r! A8 ?7!ge t- expl in #ER< ,-*pli, te! Sit7 ti-n -3 Re@7est 3-r E*ergen,8 Restr ining Or!er n! In'7n,ti-ns BT6e ppe r n,e -3 ?7sti,e is s I*p-rt nt s ?7sti,e itsel3C
t6
Response to Order and further information ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE and LAW FOR THE NEED OF AN Emergenc !otion to "e heard " a #udge in the Federa$ court in the District of Co$um"ia A%A& ' TO &REVENT F(RTHER DA!A)E TO &LAINTIFF* &$aintiff incorporates a$$ information supp$ied to this court+ in the fo$$o,ing documents a$ong ,ith attached E-hi"its too fit the out$ine of )uide$ines " #udge Wa$ton in his Order. for #urisdiction and other /uestions presented to &$aintiff in !emorandum Opinion* &$aintiff again re/uests to go in front of a #udge to e-p$ain a 0er comp$icated situation* #anuar 12. 1345 Emergenc Restraining Order ,6FEC Comp$aint #anuar 15. 1345 Verif ed Comp$iant 7 to be amended #anuar 15. 1345 Re/uest for Emergenc restraining Order and In8ection ,ith other E0idence #anuar 24. 1345 1nd Re/uest for Emergenc Other E0idence Restraining Order and In8unction ,ith
Fe"ruar 1. 1345 2rd re/uest for Emergenc Restraining Order and In8ection ,ith Other E0idence and to go in front of a #udge* Fe"ruar 2. 1345 !otion to "e heard " a #udge Fe"ruar 9. 1345 5th Re/uest for E!ER)ENC: RE%TRAININ) ORDER and IN#(NCTION WITH OTHER EVIDENCE and to "e heard " a #udge ;The appearance of #ustice is as Important as #ustice itse$f< &$aintiff in the $ast ,ee= sat in on different #udges Court rooms to o"ser0e ho, the Federa$ Court protoco$ ,or=ed* In #udge Wa$ton>s court ' &$aintiff does not ha0e transcript so is para phrasing ,hat he said to an appro-* in age 1? ear o$d crac= dea$er 77 You are no better than a slave master with a whip 77 &$aintiff ,as a "it ta=en "ac= ' "ut. it a$so sho,ed ho, important those chi$dren this crac= dea$er ,as harming ,as to him* %e0era$ times since %eptem"er of 133@ &$aintiff has said she has $ess rights then a %$a0e* This e-amp$e cou$d a$so "e used on the #udges ,ho ha0e ru$ed as the ha0e a"used their po,er in their actions against &$aintiff in co$$usion in Fraud on the Court. per8ur . a"use of &$aintiff>s re$igious. (nited %tates Constitutiona$. Virginia
2
%tate Constitutiona$. Ci0i$ Rights and "asic right to Due &rocess and the right to ser0ices in the courts that &$aintiff paid fees for a Areach of Contract* The 8udges ha0e ru$ed ,ith Fa0oritism and Cron ism ignoring their Oaths of Office. #udicia$ &rocedure. and Court &rocedure* The Judges have treated Plaintiff no better than as slave master with a whip. In the !emorandum Opinion ,hich &$aintiff is gratefu$ to ha0e she ,i$$ address the areas of concern " the #udge that &$aintiff ma ha0e missed in the documents ' &$aintiff is ,e$$ a,are a mista=e ,as made in %eptem"er of 133@ that 8ust as ,ith Ni-on the Co0er up of this mista=e ,as ,hat "rought do,n his &residenc not necessari$ the actions of the mista=e itse$f*
1. &age 1 &aragraph 1 ;T4e P)!%'(%**5s s36/%ss%o's !re so r!/6)%'1 !'&
&%sor1!'%7e& (4e Co3r( 8!''o( %&e'(%*9 ! :%!6)e 8)!%/ (4!( 8!' 0ro0er)9 6e !&;3&%8!(e& %' (4%s *e&er!) &%s(r%8( 8o3r(< &$aintiff is "efore this court on an une/ua$ footing. &$aintiff has tried and fai$ed to "e a"$e to get $ega$ representation* &$aintiff>s fundamenta$ right to Due &rocess the "asic Freedoms that our countr stands for* The right to due process ,ithout Fraud from La, ers. #udge>s. #udicia$. E$ected officia$s is a primar component of Freedom* The right to a Fair Tria$ ' Due &rocess is the "asic Constitution right that has "een the source of the $ight of freedom that our Countr has gi0en the Wor$d* This "asic Li"ert is ,hat our f$ag stand for and here is ,here the standard of Li"ert is set for the rest of the Wor$d* When re0ie,ing a pro-se p$eading. it is prudent to fo$$o, the federa$ practice of $i"era$$ construing the a$$egations set out in the p$eading to determine ,hether the p$eading asserts an 0a$id causes of action* %ee. e*g. Harrison v. U.S. Postal Services ?53 F* 1d 445B. 44C1 D5th Cir* 4B??E* The factua$ a$$egations shou$d "e 0ie,ed in the $ight most fa0ora"$e to the p$eading part * Davis v. it! of Portsmouth" C@B F* %upp* 413C. 413B743 DE*D* Va* 4B?2E. aff>d. @51 F *1d 455? D5th Cir* 4B?5E* ;Citation+ B2F* 1d 242 D1d Cir* 4B2@E An 8udgment procured " fraud is nu$$ and 0oid* An erroneous 8udgment
3
ma "e attac=ed co$$atera$$ * &$aintiff has as=ed se0era$ times to "e a$$o,ed in front of a #udge to e-p$ain documents* &$aintiff is a,are that &$aintiff must sho, that &$aintiff can pro0e each e$ement of a$$eged facts in her c$aims* That to see= re$ief for the 0io$ation of a person>s Federa$ and Constitution rights under Tit$e 51 F 4B?2 it a$$o,s &$aintiff to her rights contained in the (nited %tates Constitution as defined " Federa$ La,*
A. C$aim one ' &$aintiff has "een discriminated against for "eing Catho$ic That
Ci0i$ Rights Act of 4B9? enacted 4? (%C 15C pre0ents discrimination due to Re$igion That this is a Hate Crime and ;Hate crime $a,s are co$or"$ind< Fact the case ,hich the %upreme Court uphe$d hate crimes of the First amendment attach. Wisconsin 0* !itche$$. C3? (*%* 5@9D4BB2E in0o$0ed a ,hite 0ictim*
B. C$aim t,o ' &$aintiff has "een discriminated against for "eing "$ac= "a$$ed
" the O$d Ao >s Net,or= 6 #udicia$ Communit due to her -7hus"and "eing the son of the $ate #udge A$"ert )renadier ,hom ,as the Hus"and to Defendant I$ona a $a, er ,ho has a$so inter0ened into Defendants Di0orce* That the discrimination and segregation among ,hite e-ist the po,er Hierarch " a mem"er of one that is considered " others inferior to the other*
C. C$aim Three ' &$aintiff has fore0er "een harmed ,ith the "$og
8,grenadierisa$air*"$ogspot*com That &$aintiff has a ;protected characteristic< ,hich ,i$$ "e pro0en as to ,h &$aintiff ,as sought out " Defendant and that factor is ,h &$aintiff ,as targeted " Defendants
D. C$aim Four 7 Areach of Contract " the #udicia$ % stem in Virginia "
co$$ecting fees for ser0ices &$aintiff has "een denied* The actions ,i$$ "e pro0en factua$$ " Orders. Letters. Documents fi$ed in the court and other*
That the constitutiona$ Right of Due &rocess has "een denied time and time again*
E. C$aim Fi0e ' &$aintiff has "een harmed " the fa$se statements ,hich are
considered defamator ' t6 t 2l inti33 6 s B THE TRUTHC (6i,6 is n As-l7te !e3ense * That the First Amendment of the (*%* Constitution ,as designed to protect Freedom of the press* The 4B95 case Ne, :or= Times Co* 0* %u$$i0an radica$$ changed the nature of $i"e$ $a, " esta"$ishing a suit for $i"e$ ou needed to pro0e that the information ,as ,ho$$ and patent$ fa$se or that it ,as pu"$ished ;,ith rec=$ess disregard of ,hether it ,as fa$se or not<
F. C$aim %i- ' &$aintiff ,i$$ pro0e a 0io$ation of &$aintiffs Ai$$ of Rights the Four
Basic freedoms are being Violated The Four Freedoms 1. 2. !. ". Freedom of speech Freedom of orship Freedom from ant Freedom from fear
&$aintiff ,i$$ sho, the actions of the Defendants ,ere actions that ,ere ,i$$fu$ acts ,ere ma$icious. 0io$ent. oppressi0e. fraudu$ent. ,anton. or gross$ rec=$ess That the defendants ,ere acting under the co$or of %tate and Federa$ $a,* That the Constitutiona$ Rights of due process are factua$ a$$egations that ,i$$ "e pro0en through documents. $etters. e7mai$s and actions of defendants* That defends had "een gi0en notice. and this court is a,are of ,ith the threat from Defendant I$ona>s attorne * That Defendants ne0er fi$ed a response. in regard to the Restraining Order and In8unction* Defendants ,ere notified on or around #anuar 11. 1345 and Order ,as not ,ritten unti$ #anuar 24. 1345 (it6 NOT ONE De3en! nt resp-n!ing -r !isp7ting 2l inti33Ds 3 ,ts. that is un$ess there ,as e-7parte communications*
2. &age 2 &aragraph 2 #$nsofar as the plaintiff complains of wrongdoing on the part
of the %irginia courts" this ourt has no authorit! to review" overturn or otherwise
5
effect their rulings.& &$aintiff is not a,are of as=ing this court to o0erturn an ru$ings in an documents su"mitted* &$aintiff is in this court and has pointed out the crimina$ actions of the Virginia courts as to ,h she is in this court* This court has #urisdiction o0er a$$ ci0i$ rights matters and &$aintiff>s Ci0i$ Rights "ecause she is Catho$ic has "een 0io$ated. a$ong ,ith other Constitutiona$ Rights 7 &$aintiff is not in an ,a as=ing this court to o0erturn an actions of the Virginia Courts*
!. The %ta$=ing and !a$icious Treatment of &$aintiff " Defendants I$ona and
Defendant Leah La- et a$ a$ong ,ith others This e7mai$ a$one sent " &residentia$ Candidate for 1349 ,ith the co$$usion of $a, er I$ona E$ Freedman )renadier and other e7mai$s that ,ere fa$sified in a ,e"site 8,grenadierisa$air*"$ogspot*com sa &$aintiff is racist against others is enough to pro0e $ia"$e intent ' :et &$aintiff has supp$ied other e0idence in her defense* This e7mai$ is not the on$ one &$aintiff ,i$$ enter into e0idence at the appropriate time se0era$ e7mai$s simi$ar in nature to this* The Hate defendants ha0e for Catho$ics. Christians. !us$ims. Homose-ua$s and ,ith the picture of and the ta$= of First Lad !iche$e O"ama ha0ing a penis ou cou$d add in m opinion African Americans* No matter ,hat our opinion on Hi$$ar C$inton or !iche$e O"ama are ' the disrespect is disgusting and according to the $a, $ia"$e*
From+ LeahLa-4125Gao$*com HLeahLa-4125Gao$*comI To+ 8,grenadierGgmai$*com Tue. Dec 15. 1342 at 1+3C &!
( nt t- 6e r s-*et6ing *-re s, rier I ,-nt ,te! Il-n El8 Free!* n ;ren !ier He,:* n 8-7r (it,6 67nt is -4er
From:LeahLax1234@aol.com #$eah$a%12!"&aol.com'
To* - grendier&gmail.com
ou =no, ,hat <OU DIDNJT HEL& #EW%
THEM IN AECA(%E ONE &ER%ON DID %O!ETHIN) TO :O( THAT WA% #EWI%H* :O( !ADE :O(R AED AND
:O( LIED IN IT K THI% FA!IL: RE#ECTED :O( FOR NOT AEIN) #EWI%H* :O( %T(&ID )O:*
<OU
WERE RE?ECTED ** )ET THAT INTO :O(R THICL %L(LL* NOW :O( ARE !ALIN) (& %TORIE% AND %&READIN) LIE%K BLAMIN; ALL ?EWS LIEE HITLER FOR NOT LI#IN; ON EAS< STREET*
WELL )ET OFF :O(R A%%* )OOD :O( LO%T ALL :O(R !ONE: !ALE% :O( H(!ALE* AND )OOD :O( )OT A WHI&&IN) FRO! A #EWI%H LAW:ER WHO WA% %!ARTER THEN :O(R%* )OOD FOR HER* I WO(LD HIRE HER IN A HEART AEAT* %HE WENT AFTER A #EW HATIN) NAMI AND %HE WON* AND I HO&E %HE ;A#E HER ;RANDSON A ;OOD TALEIN; TO FOR MARR<IN; A ;O< IN THE FIR%T &LACE AND HE %HO(LD HAVE LE&T HI% MI&&ER (& AND NOT HAVE HAD %EN WITH A !ENTALL: %ICL &IECE OF CRA& LILE :O(*
:O( HATE
from &$aintiff* &$aintiff is not a$one in this t pe of treatment* Documents ,i$$ sho, she ,as in co$$usion ,ith the #udges. other $a, ers. the V%A. the #IRC. the %upreme Court of Virginia. she is a $a, er ,ho is gui$t of -3 Aeing in4-l4e! in . &er8ur . O"struction of #ustice. Aiding and a"etting o"struction of #ustice. Fraud on the Court. In0o$0ement of Forger . Theft of mone from the %onia )renadier Trust account through her $a, office for great persona$ gain o0er O43 !i$$ion in Rea$ Estate. Theft of Herman )renadier. ma$practice. Ari"er . A"use of her Oath of Office. Conspirac . Co$$usion. !iscarriage of #ustice. pre0enting Due &rocess. conf$ict of interest ' re$ated to the practice of $a,. 0io$ating code of ethics. has $ia"i$it to her 0ictims. has 0io$ated &$aintiffs Re$igious. &o$itica$. (nited state Constitutiona$. Virginia Constitutiona$ and Ci0i$ Rights. Areach of Fiduciar Duties. R(LE% OF &ROFE%%IONAL COND(CT. Tit$e 4? (% code 154 Conspirac against rights. and 151 Depri0ation of rights under co$or of $a,. Reta$iator P Retri"ution actions. Treason. Tit$e VI Ci0i$ Rights Act of 4B95 Tit$e VI. 51 (*%*C* 1333d et se/*. ,as enacted as part of the $andmar= Ci0i$ Rights Act of 4B95. 4? (%CF B41* With her Intention to 4? (%C F 4254 7Frauds and s,ind$es. Defraud. Areach of Contract. Ar"itrar
7
and Capricious "eha0ior. Committed Fraud on the Court. F 4?*175B?*2* !isrepresentations prohi"ited. F 4?*174@1 7 Forging. uttering. etc*. other ,ritings et a$* All -3 A-4e ,6 rges (ill Ae pr-4en (it6 letters" !-,7*ents" (itnesses (6- 6 4e ls- Aeen 6 r*e! A8 t6e ,ti-ns -3 De3en! nt Il-n +
B. De3en! nt Le 6 L x et l sin,e M 8 -3 $&1% has "een sta$=ing and started
harassing &$aintiff in hopes " a$$ appearance ,inning fa0or ,ith other F$orida ,ea$th #e,s $i=e Defendant I$ona and her fami$ * To ,in fa0or she " a$$ appearance to destro &$aintiff. ,ith ,i$$fu$ acts that are and ,ere ma$icious. 0io$ent. oppressi0e. fraudu$ent. ,anton. or gross$ rec=$ess* &$aintiff has in past fi$ings inc$uded Defendants intent through her getting &$aintiff =ic=ed off one of her Face"oo= pages. ,ith o0er 1233 $i=es ,i$$ fore0er damage &$aintiff* That &$aintiff ,i$$ "e a"$e to sho, that Leah La- et a$ and her Campaign is a Fraud* %he has et to fi$e a Financia$ disc$osure ,ith the FEC and co$$ecting donations since 1344. and has se0era$ out$ets that she is co$$ecting mone for her campaign this is a /uote off of her &ir - site*
I affirm that the following statements are true and accurate:
ontributions to '()*TT+ ,$''*) are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tapurposes. ontributions from foreign nationals and federal government contractors are prohibited. '()*TT+ ,$''*) is registered with the .ederal *lection ommission as an independent e-penditure committee. A88or&%'1)9, =e /!9 !88e0( 3')%/%(e& 8o'(r%63(%o's *ro/ %'&%:%&3!)s, 8or0or!(%o's, !'& o(4er or1!'%7!(%o's< Yo3r 8o'(r%63(%o' %s 'o( s36;e8( (o FEC )%/%(s< LORETTA MILLER s0e'&%'1 %s %'&e0e'&e'(" and it does not ma/e contributions to" or coordinate its spending with" an! candidates or political parties
". To ,arrant pre$iminar in8uncti0e re$ief. the mo0ing part must sho, A. S7Ast nti l li:eli6--! -3 s7,,ess -n t6e *erits H &$aintiff "e$ie0es she
has pro0ided this court ,ith the information needed to out$ine the actions of "oth defendants and the Crimina$ actions of a$$ the Defendants a$ong ,ith documentation that shou$d ,ithout dou"t assure this court
8
B. T6 t s6e (-7l! s733er irrep r Ale in'7r8 i3 t6e in'7n,ti-n (ere n-t
gr nte! H &$aintiff has a chi$d friend$ product that has "een for e0er harmed " the $oss of %ocia$ !edia. the "$og 8,grenadierisa$air*"$ogspot*com the e7mai$s that ,ere created " or from the hac=ing of &$aintiff>s computer that state the fo$$o,ing ' A)AIN &LAINTIFF HA% NEVER %AID THI%K &$aintiff WILL AE &ROVE These e7 mai$s to AE THE FRIVOLO(% imaginati0e of Defendants to permanent$ harm &$aintiff* ?7st t6e n *e -3 t6e Al-g itsel3 is -33ensi4e n! 4i-l tes 2l inti33sD C-nstit7ti-n l rig6ts H n! is liAel n! !e3-r* ti-n -3 ,6 r ,ter -3 2l inti33 . ;=1re'!&%er%s!)!%r<6)o1s0o(<8o/
77777Origina$ !essage77777 From+ #W) H8,grenadier2Gao$*comI To+ mugg catscreams Hmugg catscreamsGao$*comI %ent+ Tue . #an @. 1345 41+4C am %u"8ect+ Re+ Had it ,ith ouK Loo= ou #e, Aastard I had it ,ith ou and no, ou are going to pa * Warm$ . #W )renadier
This letter came to us here at ,ugg/ Cat at +*"> 4, E7T. Doesn?t this sho the 0ind of obsession that 1anice 2ol0 3renadier has against an/one that doesn?t agree ith her. 2hat is ne%t= .s she going to go after our families= ;o e<er she ent after her famil/ or should e sa/ e%-famil/ ho diso ned her. 2e ha<e posted pre<ious letters that 1anice 2ol0 3renadier had sent to her famil/ in pre<ious blog posts. @o here is something reall/ funn/ and intersting about 1anice 2ol0 3renadier. 2ell actuall/ a fe funn/ things. Toda/ she as seen na0ed in her bac0 /ard building an ice alter to her Dar0 $ord 7atan. 7he as doing this in the freeAing rain. The scar/ part as she had icicles hanging from her o<ersiAed nipples and from her pubic hair. 7he then too0 a large icicle and began to masterbate ith it until it melted. A neighbor had seen 1anice 2ol0 3renadier al0ing out of a se% shop Frida/ night ith a large bag filled ith
1.
se% to/s and t o <er/ large omen ho loo0ed li0e AmaAons. The/ ere seen dri<ing to a ga/ bar in hich 1anice and the t o omen freBuent and ha<e pa-ama parties after ards. 7he left 7aturda/ morning ith her hair disarra/ and a smile on her face. A dog collar could be seen around her nec0 and elts on her arms and legs. 2e don?t thin0 she is the dominant one in this relationship. Famil/ ser<ices should ha<e ta0en her 0ids a a/ from her /ears ago. 7he neglected them for her se%ual pleasures and alcohol addiction. 1anice 2ol0 3renadier adores her Fuher Adolf ;itler ho as also bi-se%ual. 1anice 2ol0 3renadier has been seen earing a painted on mustache -ust li0e her idol and al0ing around earing a 7 astic0a on her rare selfie
of 1anice 2ol0 3renadier This classless oman should be put a a/ in a padded cell so she can?t hurt an/one else. 7omeone please call the authorities to ha<e her institutionaliAed for her safet/ and for the safet/ of others. Cemember she carries a gun9
7ent* 2ed ( 1an 1( 2)1" 1)*"> am 7ub-ect* Ce* i agree ith /ou :ou FFCGE@ 1E27999999 A$$ 5F :5F . D.CG FACCE$ 157; C5;E@( $EA; $AH AGA $5CETTA $AH ,.$$EC A@D T;E CE7T 5F :5F FFCGE@ !) 1E27. ;itler as right9 :a?ll deser<e to die9 :5F 7;5F$D BE 4$ACED .@ A B.3 5VE@. 2arml/( 12 3renadier 2e hope that /ou -oin us on Frida/( 1anuar/ 1)th( 2)1" outside of 1anice 2ol0 3renadier?s house to protest her anti-American pro-7atan <alues. Email us at mugg/catscreams&aol.com for 1anice 2ol0 3renadier?s address. 2e are e%pecting at least 2)) people so don?t forget to bring ;ol/ 2ater from /our church to purif/ and sactif/ the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of the <essel of 7atan. 2e ill ha<e a pra/er session to pra/ for her lac0 of soul but do not loo0 her straight in the e/es or /ou ill be turned to stone. 4osted b/ mugg/ cat at 8*"8 A, Email ThisBlogThis97hare to T itter7hare to Faceboo0 $abels* C.A( FB.( ;illar/ Codman Clinton( 1anice 2ol0 3renadier( G3B( leah la%( ,.>( ,.D( $y 3illo" 3ac ( 5bama( <irginia la 2)1)
T6 t t6e A-4e is '7st % p ges -7t -3 l*-st $&& printe! -7t p ges -3 sl n!er n! LiAel -3 2l inti33 A8 De3en! nts+ &$aintiff fe$t the e7mai$s that "ear her name that she did not ,rite shou$d ho$d a $ot of ,ait in ,hat &$aintiff ,i$$ "e a"$e to pro0e*
C. T6 t n in'7n,ti-n (-7l! n-t s7Ast nti ll8 in'7re -t6er intereste!
p rties n! This "$og has hurt no one "ut &$aintiff and her a"i$it to mar=et and ad0ertise a Chi$d Friend$ product* This "$og and other actions ,ere de$i"erate ,i$$fu$ acts that are and ,ere ma$icious. 0io$ent. oppressi0e. fraudu$ent. ,anton. or gross$ rec=$ess* That the hac=ing and =i$$ing of &$aintiff>s computers ,as ma$icious and has a$so pre0ented &$aintiff the right to mar=et her product*
D. T6 t t6e p7Ali, interest (-7l! Ae 37rt6ere! A8 t6e in'7n,ti-n H the
HATE CRI!E OF THI% is sinfu$ and that this court cannot see that "ecomes /uestiona"$e to the rationa$ of fairness* That the se-ua$ and in appropriate photos of Hi$$ar C$inton and !iche$e O"ama in there "$ogs ' The racist and re$igious o0ertures of HATE A: DEFENDENT% is so o"0ious that to ha0e to go an further ,ou$d sho, Aias " this court and an one of norma$ mora$ 0a$ue* * ;Fairness of course re/uires an a"sence
12
of actua$ "ias in the tria$ of cases* Aut our s stem of $a, has a$,a s endea0ored to pre0ent e0en the pro"a"i$it of unfairness* ;In re M3r84%'so'. 25B (*%* 422. 429 D4BCCE< Lo:%'1 :< $%r1%'%!. 2?? (*%* 4 D4B9@E ,as a $andmar= ci0i$ rights decision of the (nited %tates %upreme Court against discrimination* Which inc$udes "eing discriminated "ecause the #udge>s. $a, ers. e$ected officia$s and go0ernment emp$o ees ha0e decided ou are not a part of or one of them*
>. ?7ris!i,ti-n H &age 2 &aragraph 1 &$aintiff has dropped Andrea )renadier as a
Hist-r8 2l inti33 in Septe*Aer -3 $&&1 ,ent to Court in the Cit of A$e-andria Virginia* &$aintiff had fo$$o,ed a$$ the ru$es of fi$ing and ser0ice* Defendant I$ona a $a, er $ied in court to the #udge. and the #udge reprimanded &$aintiff te$$ing her not to re7fi$e unti$ Octo"er 133@* &$aintiff that night met a Federa$ #udge from this court* He
13
informed &$aintiff of her rights 'He informed &$aintiff ;:ou shou$dn>t "e cr ing ou shou$d "e re8oicing ' :ou ha0e 8ust ,on our case ' No #udge $i=es a $a, er $ ing to him in court< on a nap=in he out$ined ,hat I ,as going to put in &$aintiff>s !otion for Defau$t* That !otion for Defau$t ,as not heard unti$ Decem"er of 133@ ,hen the #udges cou$d find a retired #udge to ru$e in the fa0or of Defendant I$ona this practice ,ou$d continue and continues toda * The #udges and the e0idence sho,s this is not the $ast time the documents and statements in court " Defendant I$ona and others ha0e not "een disingenuous a$$ the ,a to the %upreme Court of Virginia* T6e slipper8 sl-pe t6 t (-7l! -pen 7p t6e tr7t6 -3 6-( 2l inti33 sin,e O,t-Aer -3 1905 6 ! Aeen * nip7l te n! t6 t t6e ,ti-ns (ere n! re still (ill37l ,ts t6 t re * li,i-7s" 4i-lent" -ppressi4e" 3r 7!7lent" ( nt-n" -r gr-ssl8 re,:less * The La, is 0er c$ear that the #udges ,ho ha0e acted " ru$ing in Fa0oritism and Cron ism and not " the Ru$es of the %upreme Court* ;An 8udge ,ho does not comp$ ,ith his oath to the Constitution of the (nited %tates. ,ars against that Constitution and engages in 0io$ation of the %upreme La, of the Land* If a 8udge does not fu$$ comp$ ,ith the Constitution. then his orders are 0oid. I' re S!=9er. 415 (*%* 133 D4???E. he is ,ithout 8urisdiction. and he6she has engaged in an act or acts of treason*< >U<S< :< W%)). 55B (*%* 133. 149. 434 %* Ct* 5@4. 99 Ed*1d 2B1. 539 D4B?3EQ Co4e's :< $%r1%'%!. 4B (*%* D9 WheatE 195. 535. C L*Ed 1C@ D4?14E< &$aintiff is a,are of and understands the difficu$ties for an #udge in this case* Aut. the $a, has "een a"used and "ro=en " the %tate of Virginia>s 8udicia$ s stem and &$aintiff ,i$$ "e a"$e to sho, this is not a uni/ue situation "ut. norma$ practice in the %tate of Virginia* The difference is the ha0e not "een a"$e to =i$$ &$aintiff or "rea= &$aintiff. and &$aintiff pra s this court $oo= at the e0idence in documents and gi0es &$aintiff the right to "e heard* ;No man in this countr is so high that he is a"o0e the $a,* No officer of the $a, ma set that $a, at defiance ,ith impunit * A$$ the officers of the go0ernment from the highest to the $o,est. are creatures of the $a,. and are "ound to o"e it*< B3(7 :< E8o'o/o3. B? %*Ct* 1?B5 D4B@?EQ (nited %tates 0* Lee. 439 (*%* at 113. 4 %*Ct* at
14
194 D4??1E< ;Further it is the o"$igation of e0er #udge to honor. a"ide " . and upho$d not on$ the Constitution and $a,s of the %tate. "ut the are "ound " the $a,s and Constitution of the (nited %tates as ,e$$*< ;%tate courts. $i=e federa$ courts. ha0e a constitutiona$ o"$igation to safeguard persona$ $i"erties and to upho$d federa$ $a,*< S(o'e : Po=e)), 51? (% 59C. 5?2 n 2C. B9 %* Ct 232@. 5B L Ed* 1d 439@ D4B@9E< ;Whene0er an officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court. he6she is engaged in ;fraud upon the court ?< I' B3))o84 :< U'%(e& S(!(es, @92 F*1d 444C. 4414 D43th Cir* 4B?CE. The Constitution of the (nited %tates A fundamenta$. guarantee that a$$ $ega$ proceedings ,i$$ "e fair and that one ,i$$ "e gi0en notice of the proceedings and an opportunit to "e heard "efore the go0ernment acts to ta=e a,a oneRs $ife. $i"ert . or propert * A$so. a constitutiona$ guarantee that a $a, sha$$ not "e unreasona"$e. Ar"itrar . or capricious* The constitutiona$ guarantee of due process of $a,. found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the (*%* Constitution. prohi"its a$$ $e0e$s of go0ernment from ar"itrari$ or unfair$ depri0ing indi0idua$s of their "asic constitutiona$ rights to $ife. $i"ert . and propert * T6e D7e 2r-,ess C$ause of the Fifth Amendment ratified in 4@B4. asserts that no person sha$$ J"e depri0ed of $ife. $i"ert . or propert . ,ithout due process of $a,*J This amendment restricts the po,ers of the federa$ go0ernment and app$ies on$ to actions " it* The Due &rocess C$ause of the Fourteenth Amendment. ratified in 4?9?. dec$ares.JSNTor sha$$ an %tate depri0e an person of $ife. $i"ert . or propert . ,ithout due process of $a,J DF 4E* This c$ause $imits the po,ers of the states. rather than those of the federa$ go0ernment* &$aintiff can sho, harm and the harm that has fore0er "een done to her from the actions of the a"o0e Defendants* &$aintiff ma not ha0e put a$$ information in the "est order ' "ut. has done the "est she can do* %he has done it ,ith a pure heart and honest ,a and sti$$ has not had her da in court to "e heard* &$aintiff has sti$$ had not
15
had due process Aoddie 0* Connecticut. 534 (*%* 2@4 D4B@4E. ,as a case "efore the (nited %tates %upreme Court gi0ing the right to due process and to "e heard* &$aintiff>s a"i$it to perform simp$e e0er da ,or= has "een stripped of her " the actions of the a"o0e Defendants ,ith her socia$ media. her computers and e7mai$ "eing hac=ed and this court is $oo=ing the other ,a * C-*es n-( 2l inti33 Aegs t6is ,-7rt t- st-p t6e terr-ris* -3 t6e A-4e De3en! nts+ T6e (eAsite '(gren !ieris l ir+Al-gsp-t+,-* is n illeg l Al-g" t6e Al-g is n! l( 8s 6 s Aeen ri!!le! (it6 lies+ T6 t 2l inti33 (it6 g--! re s-n -3 t6e p st ,ti-ns -3 De3en! nts is 3r i! 3-r 6er li3e n! 6er ! 7g6ters+ &$aintiff is a,are of o0er ,he$ming this court ,ith e0idence* &$aintiff is afraid for her $ife and if a strong message is not sent to these Defendants soon ' &$aintiff "e$ie0es she or her gir$s ,i$$ "e harmed*
as= for a specia$ )rand #ur to $oo= into the Virginia #udicia$ % stem*
B. Ha0e remo0ed immediate$ the "$og 8,grenadierisa$air*"$ogspot* C. That a restraining order for a$$ of the a"o0e "e issued to inc$ude that the
are not to ta$= a"out &$aintiff on $ine or to in an ,a contact &$aintiff or her daughters
D. A,ard &$aintiff if 8oined ,ith counse$ reasona"$e attorne s> fees and
16
F. )rant to &$aintiff such other and further re$ief as this Honora"$e Court
ma deem 8ust and proper under the circumstances. inc$uding "ut not $imited to appropriate in8uncti0e re$ief*
3. A$$o, &$aintiff her right to Due &rocess and the right to "e heard " a
Amendment to the (nited %tates Constitution* Date+ Fe"ruar 9. 1345 Respectfu$$ su"mitted. 0S011111111111111111111111111111
#anice Wo$= )renadier 4C West %pring %treet A$e-andria. Virginia 11234 Te$ephone D131E 29?7@4@? Emai$ 8,grenadierGgmai$*com
17
GRENADEIR ANDERSON STRARACE DUFFETT & KEISLER, PC /59 S+ W s6ingt-n Street Alex n!ri " #A $$%15 1&%./0%.9&&& ROBIN/RACHEAL GRENADIER Tel A4i4 Isr el A!!ress 7n:-(n RL;RENNIE)<AHOO+COM LORETTA LAX MILLER !"!# LEAH LAX !"!# MUGGY CAT !"!# BILLY SULLI$AN Pres%&e'(%!) C!'&%&!(e *or +,-. C!/0!%1' He!&23!r(ers %5& M r:et Street Hig6spire" 2A 11%&5 in3-)L-rett Miller52resi!ent+,-* CAM2AI;N FOR LORETTA LA= MILLER An! ll e*pl-8ees>4-l7nteers %5& M r:et Street Hig6spire" 2A 11%&5 DEFENDANTS . ?-intl8 n! Se4er ll8" in t6eir O33i,i l n! 2ers-n l C p ,ities
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2here is 4laintiff on Februar/ 1)( 2)1" filed for a EMERGENCEY RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER That 7er<ice to the follo ing Defendants ill be done through e-mail to the abo<e 0no n address of defendants Date+ Fe"ruar 43. 1345 Respectfu$$ su"mitted. 0S011111111111111111111111111111
#anice Wo$= )renadier 4C West %pring %treet A$e-andria. Virginia 11234 Te$ephone D131E 29?7@4@? Emai$ 8,grenadierGgmai$*com
18