Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Counterparty Default - The Legal Issues - Habib Motani
Counterparty Default - The Legal Issues - Habib Motani
Overview
Context and general legal issues Who is your counterparty? Events of Default under the 2000 and 2011 versions of the Global Master Repurchase Agreement (GMRA) Comparison with other standard agreements:
2000 and 2010 versions of the Global Master Securities Lending Agreement (GMSLA) 1992 and 2002 versions of the ISDA Master Agreement (ISDA)
Potential relevance of capital and/or exchange controls Process for terminating upon an Event of Default Practical lessons
Counterparty default the legal issues 9 July 2012
9 July 2012
What events could lead to an Event of Default under the 2000 GMRA?
Failure to pay purchase price/repurchase price Optional (specify in Annex 1), failure to deliver securities on purchase date / repurchase date (see also mini close-out below). Failure to pay sums due on mini close out.
Act of Insolvency
Suspension or expulsion from securities exchange, suspension from dealing by a govt agency or appt of trustee by regulator.
Any other breach not remedied for 30 days after notice of breach.
Not Events of Default, but also consider: a) mini-close out provisions and b) termination of affected transactions for tax event .
Also, bear in mind parties may have negotiated modifications / additional events in Annex I or a Confirmation.
9 July 2012
Act of Insolvency expanded in 2011 GMRA, more in line with definition of Bankruptcy in the ISDA Master Agreement.
In default, suspension or expulsion from securities exchange, suspension/prohibition from dealing by a Competent Authority or appt of trustee by regulator , in each case on grounds of failure to meet reqts re financial resources / credit rating.
Any other breach not remedied for 30 days after notice of breach.
Not Events of Default, but also consider: a) mini-close out provisions and b) termination of affected transactions for tax event .
Also, bear in mind parties may have negotiated modifications / additional events in Annex I or a Confirmation.
9 July 2012
2011 GMRA
Y failure to pay purchase price or repurchase price N but see specific EoDs below Option^
2000 GMSLA
N - but see specific EoDs below
2010 GMSLA
N - but see specific EoDs below
1992 ISDA
Y general failure to pay/deliver EoD
2002 ISDA
Y general failure to pay/deliver EoD
Failure to deliver
Failure to deliver or redeliver repoed/lent securities Failure to pay sums due on mini close-out Failure to comply with margin / collateral provisions
Y Y
Y Y
N/A*
N/A*
*Note the general failure to pay/deliver Event of Default in the 1992 ISDA and 2002 ISDA ^Note, however, the mini close-out provisions
Counterparty default the legal issues 9 July 2012
2011 GMRA
Y
2000 GMSLA
Y
2010 GMSLA
Y
1992 ISDA
Y bankruptcy EoD Y misrepresen tation EoD Y repudiation of agreement EoD N Y breach of agreement EoD Y Y
2002 ISDA
Y bankruptcy EoD Y misrepresen tation EoD Y repudiation of agreement EoD N Y breach of agreement EoD Y Y
Reps untrue/incorrect
Disclaiming contract
Suspension from exchange/dealing Other breach not remedied in specified time period
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N N
N N
N N
N N
9 July 2012
2011 GMRA
N N*
2000 GMSLA
N N
2010 GMSLA
N N
1992 ISDA
Y N but Termination Event N
2002 ISDA
Y N but Termination Event N but Termination Event Y but Termination Event Y but Termination Event N but Termination Event N If agreed
Force majeure
N*
N*
Tax event
N but Termination Event N but Termination Event N but Termination Event N If agreed
N If agreed
N If agreed
Y If agreed
Y If agreed
* Note that a party may be able to terminate an affected transaction for a tax event or change in fiscal or regulatory regime which have a material adverse effect on that party in the context of that transaction.
9 July 2012
9 July 2012
Redenomination
Insolvency
9 July 2012
10
Legal issues:
IMF Articles of Agreement:
Unenforceability of exchange contracts
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU General Agreement on Trade in Services Bilateral Investment Treaties
Disruption, uncertainty whether imposed with IMF approval or not Even if imposed without IMF approval:
Still potentially very disruptive The period between the imposition of the controls and the date when, in any individual contract case, they are found not to be enforceable, could be long and be one of considerable uncertainty in relation to the contract itself and what the parties ought to be doing pursuant to it
9 July 2012
11
Market disruption Settlement disruption Impact on valuations and margin Impact on account structures Possibility of criminal offence in the departing state?
Counterparty default the legal issues 9 July 2012
12
Failure to pay
What if counterparty makes payment in the new currency, not euro? Have the obligations been redenominated?
Jurisdiction Governing law Currency of payment provisions Place of payment
Grace periods? Do other provisions (e.g. Illegality/Force Majeure) apply instead of the relevant failure to pay Event of Default? What is the rest of the market doing?
9 July 2012
13
9 July 2012
14
9 July 2012
15
Bankruptcy - ISDA
1992 ISDA compared with 2002 ISDA:
9 July 2012
16
Follow internal procedures and the requirements of the legal documentation Try to act as an organisation know what other desks are doing e.g. re obtaining quotes
9 July 2012
17
Event
Under the 2011 GMRA and the 1992 and 2002 ISDA:
Event = Event of Default Early termination notice (unless AET switched on)
Acceleration
9 July 2012
18
19
9 July 2012
20
9 July 2012
21
Questions?
9 July 2012
22
Speaker
Habib Motani habib.motani@cliffordchance.com +44 (0)207006 1718
9 July 2012
23