BRAIN FINGERPRINTING TECHNOLOGY

ABSTRACT Brain Fingerprinting is a new computerbased technology to identify the The secrets ! Brain Fingerprinting "atching e#i$ence at the cri%e scene &ith e#i$ence in the 'rain 'hen a crime is committed, a record is stored in the brain of the perpetrator. Brain Fingerprinting provides a means to ob(ectively and scientifically connect evidence from the crime scene with evidence stored in the brain. )&his is similar to the process of connecting *#+ samples from the perpetrator with Brain Fingerprinting is based on the principle that the brain is central to all human acts. n a criminal act, there may or may not be many $inds of peripheral evidence, but the brain is always there, planning, e%ecuting, and recording the crime. &he fundamental difference between a perpetrator and a falsely accused, innocent person is that the perpetrator, having committed the crime, has the details of the crime stored in his biological evidence found at the scene of the crime, only the evidence evaluated by Brain Fingerprinting is evidence stored in the brain.- Brain Fingerprinting measures electrical brain activity in response to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen, and reveals a brain ./0./0 )memory and encoding related multifaceted responseelectroencephalographic perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FB agents, tests for a !" intelligence agency and for the !" #avy, and tests on real-life situations including felony crimes. Why Brain Fingerprinting? brain, and the innocent suspect does not. &his is what Brain Fingerprinting detects scientifically

when, and only when, the evidence

stored in the brain matches the evidence from the crime scene. &hus, the guilty can be identified and the innocent can be cleared in an accurate, scientific, ob(ective, non-invasive, non-stressful, and non-testimonial manner.

sub(ect in this conte%t. "ome of the non&arget are relevant to the situation that the sub(ect is being tested for. &hese stimuli, 5robes, are relevant to the test, and are significant to the sub(ect, and will elicit a ./0./0, signifying that the sub(ect has understood that stimuli to be significant. + sub(ect lac$ing this information in their brain, the response to the 5robe stimulus will be indistinguishable from the irrelevant stimulus. &his response does not elicit a ./0./0, indicating that the information is absent from their mind. #ote that there does not have to be an emotional response of any $ind to the stimuli- this test is entirely reliant upon recognition response to the stimuli, and relies upon a difference in recognitionhence the association with the 6ddball effect. THE FANTASTIC FO)R*** The ! +r phases ! Brain Fingerprinting n fingerprinting and *#+

"ER"ER "eth $ ( gy &he procedure used is similar to the 1uilty 2nowledge &est, a series of words, sounds, or pictures are presented via computer to the sub(ect for a fraction of a second each. /ach of these stimuli are organised by the test-giver to be a 3&arget,4 3 rrelevant,4 or a 35robe.4 &he &arget stimuli are chosen to be relevant information to the tested sub(ect, and are used to establish a baseline brain response for information that is significant to the sub(ect being tested. &he sub(ect is instructed to press on button for &argets, and another button for all other stimuli. .ost of the non&arget stimuli are rrelevant, and are totally unrelated to the situation that the sub(ect is being tested for. &he rrelevant stimuli do not elicit a ./0./0, and so establish a baseline brain response for information that is insignificant to the

fingerprinting, evidence recogni7ed and collected at the crime scene, and preserved properly until a suspect is apprehended, is scientifically compared

with evidence on the person of the suspect to detect a match that would place the suspect at the crime scene. Brain Fingerprinting wor$s similarly, e%cept that the evidence collected both at the crime scene and on the person of the suspect )i.e., in the brain as revealed by electrical informational brain responsesrather is than evidence

or not the evidence from the crime scene matches evidence stored in the brain of the suspect. n the ;omputer /vidence +nalysis, system the ma$es Brain a Fingerprinting mathematical

determination as to whether or not this specific evidence is stored in the brain, and computes a statistical confidence for that determination. &his determination and statistical confidence constitute the "cientific 0esult of Brain Fingerprinting8 either <information present< )<guilty<- = the details of the crime are stored in the brain of the suspect = or <information absent< )<innocent<- = the details of the crime is not stored in the brain of the suspect. Scienti!ic Pr ce$+re, Research, an$

physical evidence. &here are four stages to Brain Fingerprinting, which are similar to the steps in fingerprinting and *#+ fingerprinting8 1. Brain Fingerprinting Crime Scene Evidence Collection, 2. Brain Fingerprinting Brain Evidence Collection, 9. Brain Fingerprinting Computer

App(icati ns -. In! r%ati na( E#i$ence /etecti n. &he detection of concealed information stored in the brains of suspects, and witnesses, intelligence sources,

Evidence Analysis, and :. Brain Fingerprinting Scientific Result. n the ;rime "cene /vidence ;ollection, an e%pert in Brain Fingerprinting e%amines the crime scene and other evidence connected with the crime to identify details of the crime that would be $nown only to the perpetrator. &he e%pert then conducts the Brain /vidence ;ollection in order to determine whether

others is of central concern to all phases of law enforcement, government and private investigations, and intelligence operations. Brain Fingerprinting presents a new paradigm in forensic science. &his new system detects information directly,

on the basis of the electrophysiological manifestations of information-processing brain activity, measured non-invasively from the scalp. "ince Brain Fingerprinting depends only on brain information processing, it does not depend on the emotional response of the sub(ect. 0 The Brain "ER"ER Brain multifaceted Fingerprinting utili7es

Brain Fingerprinting incorporates the following procedure. + se>uence of words or pictures is presented on a video monitor under computer control. /ach stimulus appears for a fraction of a second. &hree types of stimuli are presented8 <targets,< <irrelevants,< and <probes.< &he targets are made relevant and noteworthy to all sub(ects8 the sub(ect is given a list of the target stimuli and instructed to press a particular button in response to targets, and to press another button in response to all other stimuli. "ince the targets are noteworthy for the sub(ect, they elicit a ./0./0. .ost of the non-target stimuli are irrelevant, having no relation to the crime. &hese irrelevants do of not the elicit a ./0./0."ome situation non-target &hese

electroencephalographic

response analysis )./0+- to detect information stored in the human brain. + memory multifaceted and encoding related electroencephalographic

response )./0./0- is elicited when an individual recogni7es and processes an incoming stimulus that is significant or noteworthy. 'hen an irrelevant stimulus is seen, it is insignificant and not noteworthy, and the ./0./0 response is absent. &he ./0./0 occurs within about a second after the stimulus presentation, and can be readily detected using //1 amplifiers and a computeri7ed signal-detection algorithm. 1. Scienti!ic Pr ce$+re

stimuli are relevant to the crime or under investigation. relevant stimuli are referred to as probes. For a sub(ect who has committed the crime, the probes are noteworthy due to his $nowledge of the details of the crime, and therefore probes elicit a brain ./0./0. For an innocent sub(ect lac$ing this detailed $nowledge of the crime, the probes are indistinguishable

from the irrelevant stimuli. For such a sub(ect, the probes are not noteworthy, and thus probes do not elicit a ./0./0.

2. C %p+ter C ntr ((e$ &he entire Brain Fingerprinting "ystem is under computer control, including presentation of the stimuli and recording of electrical brain activity, as well as a mathematical data analysis algorithm that compares the responses to the three types of stimuli or and produces a determination of <information present< )<guilty<<information absent< )<innocent<-, and a statistical confidence level for this determination. +t no time during the testing and data analysis do any biases and interpretations of a system e%pert affect the stimulus )sing 'rain &a#es t $etect g+i(t 'rain H & it & r4s presentation or brain responses. The $e#ices +se$ in Brain &a#es3

!ingerprinting

+ "uspect is tested by loo$ing at three $inds of information represented by *ifferent colored lines8 -----0ed8 information the suspect is e%pected to $now -----1reen8 information not $nown to suspect -----Blue8 information of the crime that only perpetrator would $now

Brain Fingerprinting. &he system had 100% accurate scientific results in all studies, field tests. Terry Harringt n6s Brain7Wa#e

Resp nses Y7a5is8 voltage in micro volts at the parietal )57- scalp site. 87a5is8 time in milliseconds )msec-. "timulus was presented at 0 msec.

NOT G)ILTY8 Because the blue and green. ?ines closely correlate, suspect does #ot have critical $nowledge of the crime G)ILTY3 because the blue and red ?ines closely correlate, and suspect has critical $nowledge of the crime Scienti!ic E5peri%ents, Fie($ Tests, an$ Cri%ina( Cases "cientific studies, field tests, and actual criminal cases involving over 120 individuals described in various scientific publications and technical reports verify the e%tremely high level of accuracy and overall effectiveness of /eter%inati n8 information absent. Statistica( C n!i$ence8 @@.@%

did

match

the scenario

in which

Barrington was elsewhere )at a concert and with friends- at the time of the crime. C nc(+si n Brain Fingerprinting is a revolutionary new scientific technology for solving crimes, identifying perpetrators, and e%onerating innocent suspects, with a record of 100% accuracy in research /eter%inati n8 information present. Statistica( C n!i$ence8 @@.@% Res+(ts ! the Brain Fingerprinting with !" government agencies, actual criminal cases, and other applications. &he technology fulfills an urgent need for test n Terry Harringt n For the test on "chweerAs murder at !.", the determination of Brain Fingerprinting was <information absent,< with a statistical confidence of @@.@%. &he information stored in BarringtonAs brain did not match the scenario in which Barrington went to the crime scene and committed the murder. &he determination of the Brain Fingerprinting test for alibi-relevant information was <information present,< with a confidence of @@.@%. &he information stored in BarringtonAs brain 1. www.google.com 2. www.brainfingerprint.org 9.www.brainfingerprint.pbwi$i.com governments, law enforcement investigators, agencies, corporations,

crime victims, and falsely accused innocent suspects. Re!erences