DNV Amend-Corrections October 2005

DNV OFFSHORE CODES
AMENDMENTS AND CORRECTIONS

OCTOBER 2005
DET NORSKE VERITAS
FOREWORD
DET NORSKE VERITAS (DNV) is an autonomous and independent foundation with the objectives of safeguarding life, property and the environment, at sea and onshore. DNV undertakes classification, certification, and other verification and consultancy services relating to quality of ships, offshore units and installations, and onshore industries worldwide, and carries out research in relation to these functions. DNV Offshore Codes consist of a three level hierarchy of documents: Offshore Service Specifications. Provide principles and procedures of DNV classification, certification, verification and consultancy services. Offshore Standards. Provide technical provisions and acceptance criteria for general use by the offshore industry as well as the technical basis for DNV offshore services. Recommended Practices. Provide proven technology and sound engineering practice as well as guidance for the higher level Offshore Service Specifications and Offshore Standards. DNV Offshore Codes are offered within the following areas: A) Qualification, Quality and Safety Methodology B) Materials Technology C) Structures D) Systems E) Special Facilities F) Pipelines and Risers G) Asset Operation H) Marine Operations J) Wind Turbines
Comments may be sent by e-mail to rules@dnv.com For subscription orders or information about subscription terms, please use distribution@dnv.com Comprehensive information about DNV services, research and publications can be found at http://www.dnv.com, or can be obtained from DNV,
Veritasveien 1, NO-1322 Hvik, Norway; Tel +47 67 57 99 00, Fax +47 67 57 99 11.
Det Norske Veritas. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, without the prior written consent of Det Norske Veritas. Computer Typesetting (FM+SGML) by Det Norske Veritas. Printed in Norway.
If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of Det Norske Veritas, then Det Norske Veritas shall pay compensation to such person for his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum compensation shall never exceed USD 2 million. In this provision "Det Norske Veritas" shall mean the Foundation Det Norske Veritas as well as all its subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees, agents and any other acting on behalf of Det Norske Veritas.
DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, October 2005 Contents Page 3
CONTENTS
Sec. 1 Sec. 2 Current DNV Offshore Codes ............................. 5 Amended Offshore Service Specifications.......... 7
DNV-OS-D202: Instrumentation and Telecommunication Systems, October 2000 ................................... 11 DNV-OS-E402: Offshore Standard for Diving System, January 2004 .................................................................................... 12 DNV-OS-F101: Submarine Pipeline Systems, 2000....................... 12 DNV-OS-F201: Dynamic Risers, 2001........................................... 18 DNV-OS-J101: Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures, June 2004 ........................................................................................ 19
DNV-OSS-101: Rules for Classification of Offshore Drilling and Support Units, October 2003 ............................................................. 7 DNV-OSS-102: Rules for Classification of Floating Production and Storage Units, October 2003.............................................................. 7 DNV-OSS-103: Rules for Classification of LNG/LPG Floating Production and Storage Units or Installations, May 2001 ................. 7 DNV-OSS-309: Verification, Certification and classification of gas Export and receiving terminals, January 2005................................... 7
Sec. 4
Amended Recommended Practices................... 20
Sec. 3
Amended Offshore Standards ............................. 8
DNV-OS-C101: Design of Offshore Steel Structures, General (LRFD Method), April 2004 ................................................ 8 DNV-OS-C102: Structural Design of Offshore Ships, April 2004 . 10 DNV-OS-C103: Structural Design of Column-stabilised Units (LRFD method), April 2004 ............................................................ 10 DNV-OS-C104: Structural design of self-elevating Units (LRFD-method), October 2004 ....................................................... 10 DNV-OS-C106: Structural Design of Deep Draught Floating Units (LRFD method), January 2001......... 10 DNV-OS-C201: Structural Design of Offshore Units (WSD Method), April 2005 ............................................................. 10 DNV-OS-C401: Fabrication and Testing of Offshore Structures, April 2004 ........................................................................................ 10 DNV-OS-C502: Offshore Concrete Structures, July 2004.............. 11 DNV-OS-C503: Concrete LNG Terminal Structures and Containment Systems, October 2004............................................... 11 DNV-OS-D201: Electrical Installations, January 2005................... 11
DNV-RP-A202: Documentation of Offshore Projects, January 2001 .................................................................................... 20 DNV-RP-B401: Cathodic Protection Design, January 2005.......... 20 DNV-RP-C201: Buckling Strength of Plated Structures, October 2002 ................................................................................... 20 DNV-RP-C202: Buckling Strength of Shells, October 2002 .......... 21 DNV-RP-C203: Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures, August 2005................................................................... 21 DNV-RP-C204: Design against Accidental Loads, November 2004 ............................................................................... 21 DNV-RP-F102: Pipeline Field Joint Coating and Field Repair of Linepipe Coating, October 2003 ............................ 22 DNV-RP-F103: Cathodic Protection of Submarine Pipelines by Galvanic Anodes, October 2003...................................................... 22 DNV-RP-F105: Free Spanning Pipelines, March 2002 .................. 23 DNV-RP-F106: Factory Applied External Pipeline Coatings for Corrosion Control, October 2003 .................................................... 23 DNV-RP-F107: Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection, March 2001 ...................................................................................... 23
DET NORSKE VERITAS
DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, October 2005 Page 4 Contents
DET NORSKE VERITAS
DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, October 2005 Sec.1 Page 5
SECTION 1 CURRENT DNV OFFSHORE CODES
DNV Offshore Codes Offshore Service Specifications DNV-OSS-101 Rules for Classification of Offshore Drilling and Support Units DNV-OSS-102 Rules for Classification of Floating Production and Storage Units DNV-OSS-103 Rules for Classification of LNG/LPG Floating Production and Storage Units or Installations DNV-OSS-121 Classification based on Performance Criteria Determined from Risk Assessment Methodology DNV-OSS-201 Verification for Compliance with Norwegian Shelf Legislation DNV-OSS-202 Verification for Compliance with UK Shelf Regulations DNV-OSS-300 Risk Based Verification DNV-OSS-301 Certification and Verification of Pipelines DNV-OSS-302 Offshore Riser Systems DNV-OSS-305 Rules for Certification and Verification of Diving Systems DNV-OSS-306 Verification of Subsea Facilities DNV-OSS-307 Verification of Process Facilities DNV-OSS-308 Verification of Lifting Appliances for the Oil and Gas Industry DNV-OSS-309 Verification, Certification and Classification of Gas Export and Receiving Terminals Offshore Standards DNV-OS-A101 Safety Principles and Arrangement DNV-OS-B101 Metallic Materials DNV-OS-C101 Design of Offshore Steel Structures, General (LRFD method) DNV-OS-C102 Structural Design of Offshore Ships DNV-OS-C103 Structural Design of Column Stabilised Units (LRFD method) DNV-OS-C104 Structural Design of Self-elevating Units (LRFD method) DNV-OS-C105 Structural Design of TLPs (LRFD method) DNV-OS-C106 Structural Design of Deep Draught Floating Units (LRFD method) DNV-OS-C201 Structural Design of Offshore Units (WSD method) DNV-OS-C301 Stability and Watertight Integrity DNV-OS-C401 Fabrication and Testing of Offshore Structures DNV-OS-C501 Composite Components DNV-OS-C502 Offshore Concrete Structures DNV-OS-C503 Concrete LNG Terminal Structures and Containment Systems DNV-OS-D101 Marine and Machinery Systems and Equipment DNV-OS-D201 Electrical Installations DNV-OS-D202 DNV-OS-D301 DNV-OS-E101 DNV-OS-E201 DNV-OS-E301 DNV-OS-E401 DNV-OS-E402 Instrumentation and Telecommunication Systems Fire Protection Drilling Plant Oil and Gas Processing Systems Position Mooring Helicopter Decks Offshore Standard for Diving Systems
Date of issue October 2003 October 2003 May 2001 May 2001 July 2003 March 2001 April 2004 October 2000 October 2003 January 2004 June 2004 June 2004 June 2005 January 2005 October 2005 January 2001 April 2004 April 2004 April 2004 October 2004 October 2005 January 2001 April 2005 January 2001 April 2004 January 2003 July 2004 October 2004 October 2005 January 2005 October 2000 October 2005 October 2000 October 2005 October 2004 March 2001 January 2004 April 2005 2000
Date of amendment April 2004 April 2004 October 2001 April 2005 April 2005 April 2005 April 2005 April 2005 April 2005 October 2005 April 2005 October 2004 October 2005 October 2004 April 2005 October 2005 October 2001 April 2004 October 2004 April 2002, April 2003, October 2003 April 2004 October 2005 October 2001, October 2003 October 2004 April 2005
DNV-OS-E403 Offshore Loading Buoys DNV-OS-F101 Submarine Pipeline Systems
DNV-OS-F201 Dynamic Risers DNV-OS-J101 Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures
2001 June 2004
DET NORSKE VERITAS
DNV Offshore Codes, Amendments and Corrections, October 2005 Page 6 Sec.1
Recommended Practices DNV-RP-A202 Documentation of Offshore Projects DNV-RP-A203 Qualification Procedures for New Technology DNV-RP-B401 Cathodic Protection Design DNV-RP-C102 Structural Design of Offshore Ships DNV-RP-C103 Column Stabilised Units DNV-RP-C201 Buckling Strength of Plated Structure DNV-RP-C202 DNV-RP-C203 DNV-RP-C204 DNV-RP-E301 DNV-RP-E302 DNV-RP-E303 DNV-RP-E304 DNV-RP-E305 DNV-RP-E402 DNV-RP-F101 DNV-RP-F102 Buckling Strength of Shells Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures Design against Accidental Loads Design and Installation of Fluke Anchors in Clay Design and Installation of Drag-in Plate Anchors in Clay Geotechnical Design and Installation of Suction Anchors in Clay Damage Assessment of Fibre Ropes for Offshore Mooring Onbottom Stability Design of Submarine Pipelines Naval Rescue Submersibles Corroded Pipelines Pipeline Field Joint Coating and Field Repair of Linepipe Coating
January 2001 September 2001 January 2005 February 2002 February 2005 October 2002 October 2002 August 2005 November 2004 2000 December 2002 October 2005 April 2005 October 1988 April 2004 October 2004 October 2003 October 2003 1999 March 2002 October 2003 March 2001 October 2002 May 2003 July 2005 October 2004 January 2002 January 2003 April 2004 April 1985
DNV-RP-F103 Cathodic Protection of Submarine Pipelines by Galvanic Anodes DNV-RP-F104 Mechanical Pipeline Couplings DNV-RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines DNV-RP-F106 Factory Applied External Pipeline Coatings for Corrosion Control DNV-RP-F107 DNV-RP-F201 DNV-RP-F202 DNV-RP-F204 DNV-RP-F205 DNV-RP-G101 DNV-RP-H101 DNV-RP-H102 DNV-RP-O401 Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection Design of Titanium Risers Composite Risers Riser Fatigue Global Performance Analysis of Deepwater Floating Structures Risk Based Inspection of Offshore Topside Static Mechanical Equipment Risk Management in Marine and Subsea Operations Marine operations during Removal of Offshore Installations Safety and Reliability of Subsea Systems
October 2001 April 2005 October 2005 April 2003 April 2004 October 2004 April 2005 October 2005 April 2005 October 2003 April 2004 October 2005 April 2004 October 2005 October 2003 April 2004 October 2005 October 2002
DET NORSKE VERITAS
SECTION 2 AMENDED OFFSHORE SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS

DNV-OSS-101: Rules for Classification of Offshore Drilling and Support Units, October 2003 Ch.2 Sec.1 Page 32 (Amended April 2004) A new item C202 has been inserted as follows: 202 Rolled, forged or cast elements of steel and aluminium for structural application shall be supplied with DNV's material cetificates in compliance with the requirements given in DNV-OS-B101. Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 36 (Amended April 2004) In item E201, the reference has been corrected to DNV-OSD301, Ch.2 Sec.6. Ch.3 Sec.1 Page 52 (Amended April 2004) In Table C2, column Remarks, row 6, the reference has been corrected to Sec.2 J. Ch.3 Sec.2 Page 69 (Amended April 2004) In item J301, the reference to Appendix A has been corrected to Appendix B. DNV-OSS-103: Rules for Classification of LNG/LPG Floating Production and Storage Units or Installations, May 2001 Sec.2 Page 7 (Amended October 2001) In item E201 2) the references F200, F300 and F400 should be corrected to DNV-OS-D301 Sec.7 F200, DNV-OS-D301 Sec.7 F300 and DNV-OS-D301 Sec.7 F200, respectively. Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 37 (Amended April 2004) A new item C202 has been inserted as follows: 202 Rolled, forged or cast elements of steel and aluminium for structural application shall be supplied with DNV's material cetificates in compliance with the requirements given in DNV-OS-B101. Ch.3 Sec.1 Page 54 (Amended April 2004) In Table C2, column Remarks, row 6, the reference has been corrected to Sec.2 J. Ch.3 Sec.2 Page 72 (Amended April 2004) In item J301, the reference to Appendix A has been corrected to Appendix C.
DNV-OSS-102: Rules for Classification of Floating Production and Storage Units, October 2003 Ch.2 Sec.1 Page 32 (Amended April 2004) A new item C202 has been inserted as follows: 202 Rolled, forged or cast elements of steel and aluminium for structural application shall be supplied with DNV's material cetificates in compliance with the requirements given in DNV-OS-B101.
DNV-OSS-309: Verification, Certification and classification of gas Export and receiving terminals, January 2005 Sec.2 Page 9 (Amended April 2005) In item A102, under Statutory Certification, the reference to Sec.2 C300 has been corrected to Sec.4 A300. Sec.4 Page 15 (Amended April 2005) In item B601, the numbering of Table A3 has been corrected to Table B3.
DET NORSKE VERITAS
SECTION 3 AMENDED OFFSHORE STANDARDS

DNV-OS-C101: Design of Offshore Steel Structures, General (LRFD Method), April 2004 General (Amended April 2005) The text daily mean has been changed to mean daily throughout the document. Sec.1 Table B1 Page 8 (Amended April 2005) Title for CN 30.1 has been changed to "Buckling Strength Analysis of Bars and Frames, and Spherical Shells". Sec.1 Table B3 Page 8 (Amended April 2005) Table row "ISO 13819-1 Petroleum and natural....., has been deleted. Sec.1 Page 8 (Amended April 2005) In item C207, the text "during some reference period" has been changed to "during the applicable reference period. In item C220, the text "Information in the standard in order" has been changed to "Information in the standard added in order". Sec.1 Page 9 (Amended April 2005) In item C227, the text "ships, transit waterline.." has been changed to "ships, wet transit waterline..". Sec.1 Page 10 (Amended April 2005) In item D201, the symbol "kr correction factor" has been removed from the list. Sec.2 Page 12 (Amended April 2005) In item B105, the last sentence has been changed to: "Fatigue life improvements based on mean stress level should not be applied for welded structures, ref. DNV-RP-C203." Sec.2 Page 13 (Amended April 2005) In item D204, the parameter , has been removed from the formula. Sec.3 Page 16 (Amended April 2005) Item D301 has been deleted and the following items has been renumbered accordingly. In item D306 (previously 307), the reference 309 has been changed to 308. In item D307 (previously 308), at the end of the definition of hop, the text: "operational draught, has been added. Sec.3 Page 17 (Amended April 2005) Item E201 has been changed to new E201 and E202 as follows: 201 The design of mobile offshore units shall be based on the most severe environmental loads that the structure may experience during its design life. The applied environmental conditions shall be defined in the design basis or design brief, and stated in the unit's Operation Manual. 202 The North Atlantic scatter diagram should be used in ULS, ALS and FLS for unrestricted world wide operation. Sec.3 Page 17 (Amended April 2005) Item E505 has been changed as follows: 505 For slender structures (typically chords and bracings, tendons, risers) where the Morison equation is applicable, the wave loads should be estimated by selection of drag and inertia coefficients as specified in Classification Note 30.5. A new item E506 has been added as follows: 506 In the case of adjacent large volume structures disturbing the free field wave kinematics, the presence of the adjacent structures may be considered by radiation and diffraction analyses for calculation of the wave kinematics. Sec.3 Page 18 (Amended April 2005) In item E703, the text "is in general not to be taken" has been changed to "shall not be taken". In item E1202, the text "procedure is" has been changed to "procedures are". Item E1203 has been changed as follows: 1203 When determining wind and hydrodynamic load, possible increases of cross-sectional area and changes in surface roughness caused by icing shall be considered, where relevant. Item E1600 has been deleted, and item E1601 has been moved to new item E410. Sec.3 Page 19 (Amended April 2005) Item F101 has been changed to new F101 and F102 as follows, and the subsequent items has been renumbered accordingly: 101 Where applicable data are available joint probability of environmental load components, at the specified probability level, may be considered. Alternatively, joint probability of environmental loads may be approximated by combination of characteristic values for different load types as shown in Table F1. 102 Generally, the long-term variability of multiple loads may be described by a scatter diagram or joint density function including information about direction. Contour curves may then be derived which give combination of environmental parameters, which approximately describe the various loads corresponding to the given probability of exceedance. Item H301 has been changed as follows: 301 Settlement of the foundations into the sea bed shall be considered for permanently located bottom founded units Sec.4 Page 23 (Amended April 2005) In item D305, the text "regions" has been changed to "structural parts". In item D401, the first paragraph has been changed as follows: For units which are intended to operate continuously at the same location for more than 5 years, FM testing shall be included in the qualification of welding procedures for joints which all of the following apply: A new paragraph has been added at the end of item D401: For details on FM testing methods, see DNV-OS-C401 Ch.2 Sec.1 C800. In item D501, the text "continuously at the same location for" has been added, and the reference to Sec.1 has been changed to Sec.2. Sec.5 Page 24 (Amended April 2005) Item A103 has been changed as follows: 103 Structural capacity checks of all structural components shall be performed. The capacity checks shall consider both excessive yielding and buckling. Item A105 has been changed to new A105 and A106 as follows: 105 Gross scantlings may be utilised in the calculation of hull structural strength, provided a corrosion protection system in accordance with Sec.10 is installed and maintained. 106 In case corrosion protection in accordance with Sec.10 is not installed (and maintained) corrosion additions as given
DET NORSKE VERITAS
in Sec.10 B500 shall be used. The corrosion addition shall not be accounted for in the determination of stresses and resistance for local capacity checks. Item A401, Guidance note item b), has been changed as follows: b) In case local plate bending stresses are of importance for yield check, e.g for lateral loaded plates, yield check may be performed according to DNV-RP-C201 Sec.5.
spectrum) given in Classification Note 30.5. The North Atlantic scatter diagram shall be utilised. Item A201 has been changed as follows: 201 Design fatigue factors (DFF) shall be applied to reduce the probability for fatigue failures. In item A205, the text "joint" has been changed to "element" and the first sentence in the Guidance note has been changed to: Units intended to follow normal inspection schedule according to class requirements, i.e. the 5-yearly inspection interval in sheltered waters or drydock, may apply a Design Fatigue Factor (DFF) of 1. Item A207 has been changed as follows: 207 Welds beneath positions 150 m below water level should be assumed inaccessible for in-service inspection. In item A302, the text "short" has been changed to "below the acceptable limit". Sec.9 Page 37 (Amended April 2005) In item C502, the parameter fr has been inserted in front of t0 in the equation, and the following definition has been added: fr = strength ratio as defined in 104
Item A403 has been deleted and item 404 has been renumbered 403. Sec.5 Page 25 (Amended April 2005) Item A501 has been changed as follows: 501 Elements of cross sections not fulfilling requirements to cross section type III shall be checked for local buckling. Cross sectional types are defined in Appendix A. The Guidance note in item A505 has been changed as follows:
Guidance note: If buckling resistance is calculated in accordance with DNV-RPC201 for plated structures, DNV-RP-C202 for shells, or Classification Note 30.1 for bars and frames, the tolerance requirements given in DNV-OS-C401 should not be exceeded, unless specifically documented.
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---
Sec.11 Page 45 (Amended April 2005) In item E302, the following paragraph has been added: See also requirements to tension piles in C107. Sec.11 Page 46 (Amended April 2005) Item E501 has been changed as follows: 501 Suction anchors are vertical cylindrical anchors with open or (normally) closed top, which are installed initially by self-weight penetration followed by application of underpressure (suction) in the closed compartment. The failure mechanism in the clay around an anchor will depend on various factors, like the load inclination, the anchor depth to diameter ratio, the depth of the load attachment point, the shear strength profile, and whether the anchor has an open or a closed top. Items E502 to E505 have been added as follows: 502 If the load inclination is close to vertical, the anchor will tend to move out of the ground, mainly mobilising the shear strength along the outside skirt wall and the inverse bearing capacity of the soil at skirt tip level. If the anchor has an open top, the inverse bearing capacity will not be mobilised if the inside skirt friction is lower than the inverse bearing capacity at skirt tip level. 503 If the load inclination is more towards the horizontal, the resistance at the upper part of the anchor will consist of passive and active resistances against the front and back of the anchor, and side shear along the anchor sides. Deeper down, the soil may flow around the anchor in the horizontal plane, or underneath the anchor. 504 For intermediate load inclinations, there will be an interaction between the vertical and the horizontal capacities. This interaction may lead to vertical and horizontal failure load components that are smaller than the vertical and horizontal failure loads under pure vertical or horizontal loading, see Fig.1.
In item C101, the text "cylindrical and un-stiffened conical" has been added. In items D101 and E102, the reference to Sec.2, has been deleted. Sec.5 Page 26 (Amended April 2005) The parameter kr has been removed from the formula and from the list. rc has been removed from the list. Item F402, first paragraph has changed as follows: The requirement in 401 applies to an axis parallel to the plating. For stiffeners at an oblique angle with the plating an approximate requirement to standard section modulus may be obtained by multiplying the section modulus from 401 with the factor: Sec.5 Page 27 (Amended April 2005) In item G302, the text "will be required" has been changed to "shall be carried out". In item G303, the references to "600 or 700" has been corrected to "400 and 500". Sec.6 Page 30 (Amended April 2005) In item A101 the text of offshore structures has been added. Item A104 has been changed as follows: 104 The S-N curves shall in general be based on a 97.6 % probability of survival, corresponding to the mean-minus-twostandard-deviation curves of relevant experimental data. New items A107 and A108 has been added as follows: 107 The analyses shall be performed utilising relevant site specific environmental data for the area(s) in which the unit will be operated. The restrictions shall be described in the Operation Manual for the unit. 108 For world wide operation the analyses shall be performed utilising environmental data (e.g. scatter diagram,
DET NORSKE VERITAS
1 0,8 Rv/Rv,max 0,6 0,4 0,2 0 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 R h / R h,max
Figure 1 Schematic resistance diagram for suction anchor.
DNV-OS-C103: Structural Design of Column-stabilised Units (LRFD method), April 2004 Sec.2 Page 9 (Amended April 2005) In C201, the text daily mean has been changed to mean daily two places.
DNV-OS-C104: Structural design of self-elevating Units (LRFD-method), October 2004 Sec.2 Page 10 (Amended April 2005) In C201, the text daily mean has been changed to mean daily two places.
505 It is important that the limiting equilibrium model represents properly the failure mechanisms described above and accounts for the interaction that may occur between the vertical and horizontal failure modes. Previous item E502 has been replaced by new E506 as follows: 506 The soil material coefficients to be applied to the resistance of suction anchors are set equal to:
DNV-OS-C106: Structural Design of Deep Draught Floating Units (LRFD method), January 2001 Sec.2 Page 8 (Amended April 2005) In C201, the text daily mean has been changed to mean daily.
M = 1.20 for ULS Consequence Class 1 (CC1) and 2 (CC2)

= 1.20 for ALS CC2, and = 1.00 for ALS CC1
DNV-OS-C201: Structural Design of Offshore Units (WSD Method), April 2005 Sec.5 Page 26 (Amended October 2005) In A106, the reference has been corrected to: Sec.10 B407. Sec.11 Page 47 (Amended October 2005) In C701, the reference has been corrected to: Sec.3 E800. Sec.14 Page 77 (Amended October 2005) In K303, the second reference has been corrected to: Sec.11 D500
In the calculation of the anchor resistance, strength anisotropy and the effects of cyclic loading on the undrained shear strength shall be accounted for. The characteristic undrained shear strength shall be taken as the mean value with due account of the the quality and complexity of the soil conditions. Previous items E503, E504 and E505 have been renumbered E507, E508 and E509 respectively.
DNV-OS-C102: Structural Design of Offshore Ships, April 2004 Ch.1 Sec.2 Page 16 (Amended April 2005) In A501, the text daily mean has been changed to mean daily. Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 38 (Amended April 2005) In A301, the text daily mean has been changed to mean daily. Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 38 (Amended April 2005) Item B301 has been changed as follows: 103 The inspection category for units covered by this standard shall relate to the structural category as shown in Table B1.
Table B1 Inspection categories Inspection category I II III 1)
1)
Structural category Special Primary Secondary
NDT acceptance criteria for ship side shall be taken according to Inspection category II.
DNV-OS-C401: Fabrication and Testing of Offshore Structures, April 2004 Ch.1 Sec.1 Page 10 (Amended April 2005) New items D209 to D216 have been added as follows: 209 Structural testing is a hydrostatic test, carried out in order to demonstrate the tightness of the tanks and the structural adequacy of the design. Where hydrostatic testing is not practically feasible, hydropneumatic testing may be carried out instead under provision that the test is simulating, as far as practicable, the actual loading of the tank. 210 Leak testing is an air or other medium test, carried out in order to demonstrate the tightness of the structure. 211 Hydropneumatic testing is a combination of hydrostatic and air testing, carried out in order to demonstrate the tightness of the tanks and the structural adequacy of the design. 212 Hose testing is a water test carried out to demonstrate tightness of structural items. 213 Shop primer is a thin coating applied after surface preparation and prior to fabrication as a protection against corrosion during fabrication. 214 Protective coating is a final coating protecting the structure from corrosion 215 Watertight means capable of preventing the passage of water through the structure under a head of water for which the surrounding structure is designed. 216 Weathertight means that in any sea conditions water will not penetrate into the ship. Ch.2 Sec.4 Page 39 (Amended April 2005)
DET NORSKE VERITAS
A new item B105 has been added as follows: 105 For hose testing, the hose pressure shall be at least 200kN/m2 and applied at a maximum distance of 1.5 m. The nozzle inside diameter shall be at least 12.0 mm.
DNV-OS-C502: Offshore Concrete Structures, July 2004 Sec.6 Page 38 (Amended October 2004) The reference in item B304 is corrected to read: Sec.4 F. The reference in item B305 is corrected to read: Sec.4 G. Sec.6 Page 45 (Amended October 2004) The reference in item E113 is corrected to read: E110. Sec.6 Page 56 (Amended October 2005) In item M202, the line starting with is the stress .., has been corrected to read: is the stress variation of the reinforcement (MPa) Sec.6 Page 58 (Amended October 2004) The reference in item O105 is corrected to read: B607. The reference in item O201 is corrected to read: Sec.4. Sec.6 Page 61 (Amended October 2004) The reference in item P503 is corrected to read: B607. Sec.7 Page 81 (Amended October 2004) The references to Sec.6, B407 in item P503, is corrected to read: Sec.6, B607. App.B Page 91 (Amended October 2004) The reference in item A117 is corrected to read: Sec.5 B900.
Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 24 (Amended October 2005) Under E102 bullet point a), the reference to 103 has been corrected to 101. Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 24 (Amended October 2005) Under F103 bullet point c), the SOLAS reference has been corrected to II-1/41.5.1.1. And, bullet point e) has been replaced by: For High Speed and Light Craft category B, each part of the main bus bars with its associated generators shall be arranged in separate compartments. For these vessels, c) will not apply. Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 24 (Amended October 2005) Under item F201 in the paragraph titled Exception, the reference to d) has been corrected to e). Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 33 (Amended October 2005) Under item I403 in the first line of bullet point e), kVA has been corrected to kVAh. Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 34 (Amended October 2005) Under item J102 bullet point c), the following new item has been added to the short-dash list: - remote emergency stop/shutdown arrangements for systems which may support the propagation of fire and or explosion (IACS UR E 15). Also, the related Guidance note has been changed to:
Guidance note: Examples of high fire risk areas are apart from machinery space of category A, galleys and pantries containing cooking appliances, laundry with drying equipment, spaces defined by paragraphs (8), (12) and (14) of SOLAS Ch.II-2 Reg. 9.2.2.3.2.2 for ships carrying more than 36 passengers (IACS UR E 15), and areas with fuel handling equipment.
e)
DNV-OS-C503: Concrete LNG Terminal Structures and Containment Systems, October 2004 Sec.6 Page 26 (Amended October 2004) The reference in item B602 is corrected to read: DNV-OS-C502 P500 App.D Page 52 (Amended October 2004) The reference in item A402, list item b),ii), is corrected to read: Sec.8 B
Ch.2 Sec.5 Page 52 (Amended October 2005) Item B102 has been changed to (bullet point b) and c) have been deleted): 102 Automatic voltage regulator The AVR shall be capable of keeping the voltage within the values specified for stationary and dynamic variations. Ch.2 Sec.5 Page 54 (Amended October 2005) In Table C1, the item 12 Task description has been changed to:
A.C. generator: Measuring of voltage regulation during steady and transient loading and unloading, see B202 and B203.
And, the footnotes of the table have been changed to: 1) Measuring of air gap only for machines of size 1.5 MVA and above. Ch.2 Sec.9 Page 62 (Amended October 2005) Under item B201, bullet point b) has been corrected to: b) Electrical and mechanical characteristics shall comply with the specifications of table 2, 3 and 4, respectively of IEC 60092-351(2004-04).
DNV-OS-D201: Electrical Installations, January 2005 Ch.2 Sec.9 Page 64 (Amended April 2005) In Item D201, list item c), the reference to Table D3 has been corrected to Table D1. Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 16 (Amended October 2005) Under item A204, bullet point b) has been replaced by: b) The requirement for maximum transient voltage shall also be complied with due to load shedding or tripping of consumers. The requirement for maximum transient voltage is not applicable for failure conditions.
DNV-OS-D202: Instrumentation and Telecommunication Systems, October 2000 Ch.1 Sec.1 Page 9 (Amended October 2001) In Table C1 the explanation of UID should read: User input device.
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Ch.2 Sec.2 Page 16 (Amended October 2001) Item A302 should read: 302 One command location is to be designated as the main command location. The main command location is to be independent of other command locations. Ch.2 Sec.4 Page 24 (Amended October 2001) In item C103 the number should not read 200 kW but be corrected to: 200 k. Ch.3 Sec.1 Page 37 (Amended October 2001) In item D102 the reference should be corrected to: C100. In item D201 the reference should be corrected to: Ch.2 Sec.1 F500.
Niras Norsk Hydro NPD Phillips Petroleum Rambll Oil & Gas Reinertsen Engineering Rntgen Technische Dienst bv Saga Petroleum Salzgitter Seaflex Shaw Pipeline Services Ltd. Shell SOFREGAZ Statoil Stolt Comex Seaway Vallourec & Mannesman Tubes DNV is grateful for the valuable co-operations and discussions with the individual personnel of these companies. General (throughout the document) (Amended April 2002) Yield strength should read yield stress. Sec.1 Page 6 (Amended April 2002) after C279 add: 279(b) Pressure, shut-in: The maximum pressure that can be attained at the wellhead during closure of valves closest to the wellhead (wellhead isolation). This implies that pressure transients due to valve closing shall be included. Sec.1 Page 7 (Amended April 2002) Replace C301 to C302 as follows: 301 Splash Zone Lower Limit (LSZ) is determined by: LSZ L1 L2 = |L1| - |L2| - |L3| = lowest astronomic tide level (LAT) = 30% of the splash zone wave-related height defined in 303 L3 = upward motion of the riser, if applicable 302 Splash Zone Upper Limit (USZ) is determined by: USZ = |U1| - |U2| - |U3| U1 = highest astronomic tide level (HAT) U2 = 70% of the splash zone wave-related height defined in 303 U3 = settlement or downward motion of the riser, if applicable. To item D100 add: BM Base material L Load effect PWHT Post weld heat treatment RT Radiographic testing ST Surface testing ToFD Time of flight detection UT Ultrasonic testing Sec.1 Page 7 (Amended April 2004) To item D100 add: DWTT Drop Weight Tear Test LBZ Local Brittle Zones WM Weld Material Sec.5 Page 32, (of the reprint January 2003 edition) (Amended April 2004) Equations 5.1 and 5.2 have been corrected as follows: p lt 1.05 p li p lt 1.03 p li (5.1) (5.2)
DNV-OS-E402: Offshore Standard for Diving System, January 2004 Appendix A Page 54 (Amended April 2004) Under sub-section element A200, add the following item: 202 Parameters applied for correction of units in empirical formulae: h1 L1 u1 u2 = = = = 1 m -1 1 m -1 1 m/s 1m
Appendix A Page 54 (Amended October 2004) Previous item B103 Motions of ship shaped support vessels, has been renumbered 102. Appendix A Page 55 (Amended October 2004) In item B102, the formula for az has been corrected as follows: ( 5 h 1 h s 0.02 h 1 h s L 1 L + 1 ) g - {m/s 2 } a z = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------100
DNV-OS-F101: Submarine Pipeline Systems, 2000 Spine (Amended April 2002) Replace spine with: DNV-OS-F101 Submarine Pipeline Systems, 2000 Page iv, Acknowledgement (Amended April 2003) The text concerning cooperative organisations should read: The Standard has been circulated on extensive internal and external hearing. The following organisations have made major contributions to the hearing process: Allseas Engineering Andrew Palmer & Associates BHP Steel BP Amoco Exploration British Steel Brown & Root Coflexip Stena Offshore DSND DST EMC Europipe Exxon Prod. Research Company ITOCHU JP Kenny Ltd Kawasaki Steel Mentor Project Eng. Navion
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Sec.5 Page 33, (of the reprint January 2003 edition) (Amended April 2003) Table 5-2 page 33 should read
Table 5-2 Characteristic material strength, fy,fu Value fy = (SMYS - fy,temp)U fu = (SMTS - fu,temp)UA Property Characteristic yield stress Characteristic tensile strength
buckling has occurred. In case the external pressure exceeds the criteria given below, buckle arrestors should be installed and spacing determined based on consequences of failure. The propagating buckle criterion reads: t 2 2.5 - p pr = 35f y fab -- D p pr p e ------------ m sc Sec.5 Page 37 (Amended April 2004) In the Guidance note in D508, d/t has been replaces by D/t. Sec.5 Page 38 (Amended April 2004) The list of references in D701 has been amended as follows: CN 30.5 Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads. DNV-RP-C203 Fatigue Strength Analysis of Offshore Steel Structures DNV-RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines In D710, the reference to DNV Guideline No. 14 has been replaced by DNV-RP-105. Sec.5 Page 41 (Amended April 2002) Add the following to Table 5-10:
10-2 - 10-3 To be evaluated on a case by case basis
Sec.5 Page 34 (Amended April 2002) Add the following Guidance note to item D204:
Guidance note: For the system pressure test condition, the local test pressure is considered as incidental pressure. In order to calculate the corresponding pld, included in pd above, the local test pressure shall be calculated as:
pt - + t gh ref p e p d = p ------- inc

where href is the vertical distance between the point in question and the reference height and inc should be 1.1. The same approach applies to when the shut-in pressure is used.
Sec.5 Page 35 (Amended April 2002) In item D301, delete the following sentence: The load effect factors apply to all design formats unless explicitly stated. Sec.5 Page 36 (Amended April 2002) In item D505, replace as follows: pb(t2) = Burst pressure Eq. (5.15) c = Flow stress parameter accounting for strain hardening given by: fu c = ( 1 ) + --fy but maximum 1.20 0.4 + q h for D/t 2 < 15 = ( 0 .4 + q h ) ( 60 D/t 2 ) /45 for 15 D/t 2 60 0 for D/t 2 > 60 ( p ld p e ) 2 - ----- ---------------------qh = pb ( t2 ) 3 0
for p ld > p e for p ld p e
Sec.5 Page 37 (Amended April 2002) Add the following Guidance note item D507:
Guidance note: The maximum yield to ultimate stress ration, h, is found in Table 6-3 and Table 6-6. The increase of this factor with 0.02 in accordance with footnote 5 and 3 in these tables respectively does not apply since it is already included in the factor 0.78.
Sec.5 Page 42 (of the reprint January 2003 edition) (Amended October 2005) In item D1203, Pf1/2Di has been corrected to Pf | Di. Sec.5 Page 43 (of the reprint January 2003 edition) (Amended October 2003) In item E401, correct the definition for as follows: = Lateral soil friction coefficient Sec.6 Page 47 (Amended April 2002) Replace item A404 as follows: 404 Linepipe formed from strip (skelp) and welded with one longitudinal seam, without the use of filler metal. The longitudinal seam is generated by high frequency current (minimum 100 kHz) applied by induction or conduction. The weld area (heat affected area) or the entire pipe shall be heat treated. The forming may be followed by cold expansion to obtain the required dimensions. Sec.6 Page 48 (Amended April 2002) Replace item C104 as follows: 104 If materials shall be used at a design temperature above 50C, the yield strength at the Tmax may be determined during the qualification of the manufacturing procedure specification. This information shall be obtained either by use of the curves in Sec.5 B600 or by testing. Sec.6 Page 51 (Amended April 2002) Replace (footnote reference) in Table 6-3 as follows:
Charpy V-notch energy (KVT) minimum J 6)
Replace item D510 as follows: 510 Propagation buckling cannot be initiated unless local
Sec.6 Page 51 (of the reprint January 2003 edition) (Amended October 2003) In the heading of Table 6-6, replace YS(Rr0.5) as follows: YS(Rt0.5)
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Sec.6 Page 51 (Amended April 2004) In the heading of Table 6-6, replace in the fourth column as follows: YS ( R t 0.5 ) ----------------------UTS ( R m )
3)
ficiently illuminated area (approximately 500 lx) by trained personnel with sufficient visual acuity (e.g. Jaegar J-w eyesight test at 300 mm within the last 12 months). The surface finish produced by the manufacturing process, shall ensure that surface imperfections can be detected by visual inspection. Sec.6 Page 63 (Amended April 2002) Replace part of Table 6-11 as follows:
Metallographic examination Pipe body Weldment Q(&P9) Q Q&P Q&P Q&P Q&P
max
( h ) Sec.6 Page 53 (Amended April 2002) Replace item C515 as follows: 515 The hardness of base material, cladding material, HAZ, weld metal and the metallurgical bonding area shall meet the relevant requirements of this standard (see Table 6-3 and 6-6). Sec.6 Page 59 (Amended April 2002) Replace item E504 as follows: 504 Plates and strip shall be subject to 100% visual examination on both sides. The inspection shall be performed in a sufTransverse imperfections in weld 3) UT
Add footnote: HFW, EBW and LBW pipes, only. Sec.6 Page 60 (of the reprint January 2003 edition) (Amended April 2004) In table 6-13, the row starting with Transverse imper ... shall read:
100% 5% 100%
Sec.6 Page 64 (Amended April 2002) In item E1003 replace the unit m with mm. Sec.6 Page 65 (Amended April 2002) Replace part of item E1011 as follows: 1011 Repair welding of the weld seam is allowed for SAWL and SAWH pipes only and shall be performed in accordance with qualified welding repair procedures. Requirements for welding repair procedures are given in Appendix C. Repair welding may only be performed subject to the following limitations: Sec.6 Page 66 (Amended April 2002) Replace part of item E1205 as follows: 1205 The out-of-roundness for pipe ends shall be calculated by the following formula: Sec.6 Page 67 (Amended April 2002) Replace part of Table 6-14 as follows:
Greatest difference in pipe diameter between pipe ends (each pipe meas- R 2) ured) 12.5% t
Sec.6 Page 68 (Amended April 2002) Replace parts of Table 6-15 as follows:
Greatest difference in pipe diameter between pipe ends (each pipe measured) Diameter pipe body 310 < D 1) < 610 mm 10% 10% t, but maximum 3 mm
10%
0.75% D 1), but maximum 3.0 mm
Sec.7 Page 71 (Amended April 2004) In B307, the title of the referenced DNV-RP-F104 has been changed from Submarine Pipeline Couplings to Mechanical Pipeline Couplings. Sec.7 Page 71 (Amended April 2002) Replace Table 7-2 as follows:
Table 7-2 Bolts and nuts for subsea use Bolt Nut Size range ASTM A320, ASTM A194, Grade 4/S3 (Low- < 50 mm Grade L7 temperature requirement for Grade 4 and Grade 7 nuts) ASTM A320, ASTM A194, Grade 7 < 100 mm Grade L43
Sec.7 Page 74 (Amended April 2002) Replace item D203 as follows: 203 The chemical composition, taken from the product analysis, of material for hot-formed components, castings and forgings, shall not exceed the values given in Table 7-4. The notes given in Table 7-5 shall apply, except Note 9 and Note 10. Replace item D205 as follows: 205 For material to be quenched and tempered, the content of hardening elements Cr, Mo, Cu and Ni shall be sufficient to obtain the desired microstructure in the centre of the component. The selected chemical composition shall have adequate hardenability to ensure through thickness hardening of the respective component. Sec.7 Page 79 (Amended April 2002) Replace item G107 as follows: 107 Mother pipe in C-Mn steels shall be delivered in the normalised, quenched and tempered or TMCP condition. Sec.7 Page 80 (Amended April 2002) Replace item G301 as follows: 301 In general all the requirements given in Sec.6 D100 shall apply. The chemical composition of pipe for bends shall comply with Table 6-7 and Table 6-8 as relevant. Sec.7 Page 81 (Amended April 2002) Replace item G401 as follows: 401 In situations where dedicated mother pipes are not available for manufacturing of bends, the factors given in G100 and G200, especially G108, should be considered in order to select the most appropriate pipe for bend manufacturing. Sec.7 Page 83 (Amended April 2002) Replace in item G905 as follows: Tensile testing: Base material in the arc outer radius longitudinal and transverse (total 2 specimens) Base material in the start transition area outer radius longitudinal and transverse (total 2 specimens) unless 903 is applicable. Charpy V-notch impact testing: Base material in the arc outer radius longitudinal and transverse (total 2 sets)
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Base material in the start transition area outer radius longitudinal and transverse (total 2 sets) unless 903 is applicable. Sec.7 Page 84 (Amended April 2002) Replace in item G906 as follows: Tensile testing: Cross weld tensile testing in the arc area (one specimen) Cross weld tensile testing in the start transition area (one specimen) unless 903 is applicable Charpy V-notch impact testing: Weld metal, FL, FL + 2 mm and FL + 5 mm in the arc (4 sets) Weld metal in the start transition area (1 set) unless 903 is applicable. Sec.8 Page 90 (Page 80 of the reprint January 2003 edition) (Amended October 2005) In item D107, the reference see B103 and 0 has been corrected to see B103 and Sec.1 C299.
Table 12-1 Index and cross references Key word Reference Characteristic material Sec.5 B600 strength Sec.5 B604 Sec.5 B604 Guidance note Sec.5 B606 Sec.5 D505 and Sec.5 D506 Crossing Sec.2 B303 Sec.3 C204 Sec.5 B102 Sec.9 B300 Golden weld Sec.9 A807 Installation Sec.2 C400 Sec.5 H100(D) Sec.5 H200 Sec.9 Linepipe NDT Level Sec.5 B500 Sec.6 B100 Table 6-13 Mill pressure test Sec.1 C200 Sec.5 B200 Sec.5 D401 Sec.6 E1104 Sec.6 E1105 Sec.6 E1108 Minimum wall thickSec.5 B400 ness Sec.5 C300 Ovality Eq. (5-18) and Eq. (521) Sec.5 D800 Table 6-14 and Table 6-15 Sec.1 C200 Sec.3 B300 Table 5-7 Sec.4 B202, Sec.4 B203
Sec.8 Page 92 (Amended April 2002) Replace existing F204 with the following: 204 The concrete coating shall be reinforced by steel bars welded to cages or by wire mesh steel. The following recommendations apply: For welded cages, the spacing between circumferential bars should be maximum 120 mm. Steel bars should have a diameter of 6 mm minimum. The average cross sectional area of steel reinforcement in the circumferential direction should be minimum 0.5% of the longitudinal concrete cross section. The corresponding cross sectional area of steel reinforcement in the longitudinal direction should be minimum 0.08% of the transverse concrete cross section. Sec.9 Page 98 (of the reprint January 2003 edition) (Amended October 2005) In item O403, the text ..through a 50 m filter.., has been corrected to ..through a 50m filter... Sec.12 Page 127 (Amended April 2002) Replace Table 12-1 as follows:
Comment or aspect fk Relation to supplementary requirement U Proposed (conservative) de-rating stresses Reduction due to the UO/UOE process Reduction in longitudinal direction Evaluation of risks Survey Minimum vertical distance Specification Requirements Safety class Design criteria Pipe straightness Installation phase Design general General introduction and designation NDT requirements Definition Link between mill pressure test and design Reduced mill test pressure implication on pressure containment capacity Basic Requirement Maximum test pressure Waiving of mill test UOE-pipes, conditions Minimum 12 mm and when it applies When to use minimum wall thickness, relation to nominal thickness and corrosion allowance Minimum allowed ovality for collapse Maximum allowed ovality, as installed Maximum allowed ovality, line pipe specification Definitions Pressure control system Table 3-1 Choice of Pressure Pressure load effect factors Table 3-1 Choice of Pressure Characteristic values
Pressure - general
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Table 12-1 Index and cross references (Continued) Pressure - incidental Sec.12 F600 Benefit of lower incidental pressure Sec.3 B300 Pressure control system Table 3-1 Selection of incidental pressure during pressure test and for full shut-in pressure Reeling Sec.5 D1006 Fracture assessment when supplementary requirement P comes into force Sec.5 D1100 Engineering criticality assessment Eq. (5-25) Capacity formula Table 5-8 Condition factor Sec.6 D300 Supplementary requirement P Sec.6 D400 Supplementary requirement D Sec.9 E Testing Spiral welded Sec.5 A204 Requirements Strain hardening Eq. 5.26 In capacity formula; strain Eq. 5.24 Capacity formula SMYS/SMTS - (in c) Table 6-3 SMYS and SMTS Table 6-3 h (YS/UTS) System pressure test Sec.1 C200 Definition Sec.5 B200 Link to design Sec.5 B202 Requirements Sec.5 B203 Waiving of system pressure test Sec.5 B204 Safety class during system pressure test Sec.5 D400 Limit state check - pressure containment Sec.5 D500 Limit state check -local buckling Sec.9 O500 Execution of the test(filling, holding time etc) Weld onto pipe Sec.7 B1203 Requirements for doubler plates etc.
Add the following new Table 12-1 b:

Table 12-1 b Characteristic material properties for design Symbol Description Reference Pressure Local contain- buckling ment Collapse Elastic properties E Youngs modulus Poissons ratio Temperature expansion, as function of the temperature (within the actual temperature range) Plastic properties SMYS Specified minimum yield stress fy, temp Yield stress temperature derating value DisLoad placePropaControl- ment gating led Control- buckling led X X X
Table 6-3 and Table 6-6 Sec.5 B603, Table 5-2 and Fig. 5-1 SMTS Specified minimum tensile strength Table 6-3 and Table 6-6 fu, temp Tensile strength temperature derating value Sec.5 B603, Table 5-2 and Fig. 5-1 A Ultimate strength anisotropy factor Table 5-2 and Table 6-3 Note 4 fab Fabrication factor Table 5-3 Plastic properties depending on additional requirements u(U) increased utilisation Table 5-2 h(P)1 Strain hardening value Table 6-3, Table 6-6 and Sec.6 D304 c(U) Flow stress parameter Eq. 5.23
X X X X X -
X X X X -
X X X X X (X) X X
X X (X) X X -
X X X X -
Sec.12 Page 107 (of the reprint January 2003 edition) (Amended October 2005) In table 12-1 b, first column, h(P)1 has been corrected to h(P). Sec.12 Page 109 (of the reprint January 2003 edition)
(Amended April 2004) Equation 12.1 shall read as follows: D t1 2 U - ( SMYS f y, temp ) (12.1) - -----------------------------( p li p e ) ------------2 t1 3 m SC
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Equation 12.4 shall read as follows: D t1 - ( SMYS f y, temp ) p d ------------2 t1 (12.4)
Sec.12 Page 128 (Amended April 2004) In E100, the definition of pt has been changed as follows: pt = 1.05 pinc (if defined in the highest point of the pipeline system) Sec.12 Page 132 (Amended April 2002) Replace item F1100 as follows: Even though the safety factor is provided in the propagating pressure formula, it is recommended to decrease this with 15% (from 35 to 30) for the propagating pressure resistance of the buckle arrestor. This to decrease the failure probability to the unconditioned safety level in line with normal ULS checks. Sec.12 Page 132 (Amended April 2002) Replace item F1400 as follows:
2 D - D - 2 c --f 0 + 0.030 1 + --------- 120t t f 0 = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (12.12) Pe 1 ---Pc
limit states for Concrete Crushing (K200), Fatigue (Sec.5 D700) and Rotation (Sec.5 H203) shall be satisfied. Reference is further made to Endal et. al. (1995) for guidance on the Rotation limit state. Sec.12 Page 138 (Amended April 2002) Replace the first paragraph after sub-heading Overbend in item K300 as follows: For static loading the calculated strain shall satisfy Criterion I in Table 12-5. The strain shall include effects of bending, axial force and local roller loads. Effects due to varying stiffness (e.g. strain concentration at field joints or buckle arrestors) need not be included. Sec.12 Page 138 (Amended April 2002) Replace the first paragraph after sub-heading Sagbend in item K300 as follows: For combined static and dynamic loads the equivalent stress in the sagbend and at the stinger tip shall satisfy the allowable stress format ASD as given in F1200, however, shall be 0.87. Appendix A Page 142 (Amended April 2002) Add: B 1000 Mill pressure test 1001 The mill test pressure is lower in ISO than in this standard. The ISO requirement is: 2t min - SMYS p = 0.95 -----------D This hoop stress formula for the ISO mill pressure test is different from the formula in ISO 13623 and DNV (which are identical). Hence, the mill test pressure difference compared to this standard depends on D/t. Appendix B A402 Page 143 (Amended April 2002) Add the following Guidance note:
Guidance note: This conversion is not applicable to API 5L type specimens
Sec.12 Page 133 (Amended April 2002) Replace item G100 as follows: Assessment at Level 2 is considered safe provided that the girth welds will not be subjected to conditions during operation that may lead to failure by fatigue crack growth or unstable fracture. Sec.12 Page 134 (Amended April 2002) Replace part of item G301 as follows: If the total displacement, Vg, is measured at a distance z 0.2a from the physical crack mouth then the CMOD can be calculated from: Sec.12 Page 134 (Amended April 2002) Replace formula for in item G302 as follows: J = ------------------------------ YS + TS m ------------------------2 Sec.12 Page 134 (Amended April 2002) In item H101 replace footnote to Table 12-4 as follows: ksi = 6.895 MPa; 1 MPa = 0.145 ksi; ksi = 1000 psi (lb f/in2) Sec.12 Page 134 to 135 (Amended April 2002) Delete second, fourth, fifth and second last paragraphs in item I200 (are given in Sec.5 G200) Sec.12 Page 136 (Amended April 2002) Replace the text in Fig. 12-3 as follows: Displacement controlled condition = NDT level 1 Sec.12 Page 137 (Amended April 2002) Replace in MDS sheet, 3rd line: DNV-OS-F101 Submarine Pipeline Systems Sec.12 Page 138 (Amended April 2002) Add after first paragraph in item K300 text as follows: In addition to the simplified stress criteria given below, the
Appendix C Page 128 (of the reprint January 2003 edition) (Amended October 2005) In Table C-1, in the table-cell below Wall Thickness (mm), the text t < 0 has been corrected to t < 20. Appendix C C400 Page 156 (Amended April 2002) Replace: C400 Batch testing Girth welds (Clarification) Appendix C Page 165 (Amended April 2004) The last sentence in F309 has been corrected to: Any requirement for fracture arrest properties as listed in Table 6-9 shall not apply for the weld and HAZ. Appendix D Page 178 (Amended April 2002) Replace item D205 as follows: 205 The type and number of ultrasonic probes shall be sufficient to ensure that the base material, or the weld and the area adjacent to the weld, is: scanned from both sides of the weld for flaws oriented parallel to the longitudinal weld axis scanned from both directions approximately parallel to longitudinal weld axis for flaws oriented transverse to the longitudinal weld axis
DET NORSKE VERITAS
fully covered by ultrasound beams that are approximately perpendicular to the surface of flaws that are reflecting the ultrasound. It may be necessary to include tandem, TOFD and/or focused probes in order to enhance the probability of detection or characterisation of flaws. Appendix D Page 180 (Amended April 2002) Replace last paragraph of item E205 as follows: The maximum allowable flaw sizes from the ECA shall be reduced in length and height with a flaw sizing error, that based on the data from the qualification testing will give a 95% confidence against under sizing of flaws. Appendix D Page 180 (Amended April 2002) Replace item F105 as follows: 105 Equipment and procedures used for the ultrasonic testing shall comply with the requirements of subsection D. The requirements for automated NDT processes given in subsection D are additional to the requirements of any code or standard referred to in this subsection where automated NDT methods are prescribed or optional. Appendix D Page 181 (Amended April 2002) Replace item F301 as follows: 301 For ultrasonic testing of the base material the requirements of F100 and F200 shall apply. Appendix D Page 182 (Amended April 2002) Replace the second bullet point in item G503 as follows: a sample pipe shall be fitted with one 3.0 mm through drilled hole at each end. The distance from the pipe end to the hole shall be equal to the length not covered by the ultrasonic testing equipment during production testing. Prior to start of production the pipe shall be passed through the ultrasonic testing equipment at the operational scanning velocity. For acceptance of the equipment both holes need to be detected by all probes. At the manufactures option these holes may be included in the reference block. Appendix D G614 Page 185 (Amended April 2002) Replace the last part of item G614 as follows: The acceptance criteria are: Table D-4 and lack of fusion and lack of penetration are not permitted. Appendix D Page 185 (Amended April 2002) Replace item G710 as follows: The length of the N5 notches shall be 1.5 times the probe (crystal) element size or 20 mm, whichever is the shorter. The length does not include any rounded corners. The width of the N5 notches shall not exceed 1 mm. Appendix D, Table D-3 Page 190 (Amended April 2002) Replace Table D-3 as follows:
Undercut, if measured by mechanical means Individual Depth d Permitted length d > 1.0 mm Not permitted 1.0 mm d 0.5 mm 50 mm 0.5 mm d 0.2 mm 100 mm < 0.2 mm unlimited Accumulated length in any 300 mm length of weld: < 4 t, maximum 100 mm
Appendix E Page 196 (Amended April 2002) Replace item B408 as follows: 408 The recording or marking system shall clearly indicate the location of imperfections relative to the 12 o'clock position of the weld, with a 1% accuracy. The system resolution shall be such that each segment of recorded data from an individual inspection channel does not represent more than 2 mm of circumferential weld distance.
DNV-OS-F201: Dynamic Risers, 2001 Sec.4 Page 24 (Amended October 2003) Replace item B501 as follows: B501 Design based on response statistics is generally the recommended procedure for consistent assessment of characteristic load effects. Sec.4 Page 25 (Amended October 2003) Replace item C201 as follows: C201 Fatigue analysis of the riser system shall consider all relevant cyclic load effects including: Sec.5 Page 29 (Amended October 2003) In Table 5-2, the NOTES and subscripts 1) and 2) refer to the ULS condition only. Replace Table 5-2 as follows:
Table 5-2 Load effect factors Limit state ULS FLS SLS & ALS
NOTES 1) 2) If the functional load effect reduces the combined load effects, F shall be taken as 1/1.1. If the environmental load effect reduces the combined load effects, E shall be taken as 1/1.3.
F-load effect 1.11) 1.0 1.0
E-load effect 1.32) 1.0 1.0
A-load effect
A
NA NA 1.0
Sec.5 Page 33 (Amended October 2001) In item D604 an absolute value operator is missing for the moment value, M in the equation (5.29). Replace equation (5.29) as follows:
M M k
Te + T k
p p min + e ( ) p t c 2
(5.29)
Sec.5 Page 34 (Amended October 2003) The denominator of the second term on the right hand side of equation (5.30) should read 2 t3 instead of t3. Replace equation (5.30) as follows:
Te 32 M (D t 3 ) + (D t 3 ) t 3 D 4 ( D 2 t 3 ) 4
(5.30)
Appendix A Page 55 (Amended October 2003) In item B401, the list numbering has been updated as follows: 1) Geometric stiffness (i.e. contribution from effective tension to transverse stiffness). Tension variation is hence a nonlinear effect for risers; 2) Hydrodynamic loading. Nonlinearities are introduced by the quadratic drag term in the Morison equation expressed
Appendix D Page 193 (Amended April 2002) In item I301 replace N5 notches with N3 (3% of thickness) notches
DET NORSKE VERITAS
by the relative structure-fluid velocity and by integration of hydrodynamic loading to actual surface elevation; 3) Large rotations in 3D space; 4) Material nonlinearities, and 5) Contact problems in terms of seafloor contact (varying location of touch down point and friction forces) and hull/ slender structure contact. Appendix B Page 70 (Amended October 2003) The s term in equation (B.19) should read equation (B.19) as follows:
1
The first equation in item C302 has been corrected as follows:

f fp exp 0.5 f p
2
4 5 f g S( f ) = f 5 exp 4 ( 2) 4 fp 2
The last equation in item C302 has been corrected as follows:

1
s a . Replace
s 1 f S (sa ) = sa exp a
Appendix B Page 70 (Amended October 2003)
(B.19)
The denominator in equation (B.21) should read 2, instead of . Replace equation (B.21) as follows:
m f 0 (2 ) 1 m1 S sw 1+ ; G1 D= 2 a1 m2 f 0 (2 ) m 2 S sw 1+ ; + G 2 2 a2
5 Tp ) = exp(5.75 1.15 HS 1
for
Tp HS
3 .6 Tp HS Tp HS 5
for 3.6 < for 5<
(B.21)
Sec.7 Page 66 (Amended October 2004) Item J203 is amended to read: 203 The maximum vertical deflection is:
max = 1 + 2 0
max = 0 1 2
= = = the sagging in the final state relative to the straight line joining the supports the pre-camber the variation of the deflection of the beam due to the permanent loads immediately after loading the variation of the deflection of the beam due to the variable loading plus any time dependent deformations due to the permanent load.
Appendix B Page 71-73 (Amended October 2003) Delete items E100, E101, E102, E103 and equation (B.25) and Table B-2. Reference is made to DNV-RP-C203 for relevant SN curves and applicable SCF.
DNV-OS-J101: Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures, June 2004 Sec.3 Page 26 (Amended October 2004)
App.A Page 101 (Amended October 2004)
Table A8 Lloyd's Register T joint factors for use in K and KT joint equations The modified value applies when predicting SCFs at the saddle on = 1 joints under axial load or out-of-plane bending, i.e. in the expressions for T1, T3, T5 and T6.
T 1 = 1.2 ( 2.12 2 ) sin 2 T 2 = 0.2 (3.5 2.4 ) sin 0.3 T 3 = 1 + 0.6 1.3 (0.76 0.7 ) sin 2.2 T 4 = 2.6 0.65 ( 0.3 0.5 ) T 5 = (1.4 5 ) sin 1.7 T 6 = 1 + 0.6 1.3 (0.27 0.2 5 ) sin 1.7
T 7 = 1.22 0.8 (1 0.68 ) sin (1 )

T 8 = 1 + 0.2 (0.26 0.21 ) sin 1.5
App.G Page 120 (Amended October 2004) The equation in item B101 has been corrected as follows:
App.G Page 121 (Amended April 2005) The equation in item C101 has been corrected as follows:
2 M z 2M z H '= + H2 + leff leff
be 2 - l e = 2 R 1 1 ----- 2 R
DET NORSKE VERITAS
SECTION 4 AMENDED RECOMMENDED PRACTICES

DNV-RP-A202: Documentation of Offshore Projects, January 2001 Sec.1 Page 6 (Amended October 2001) Insert in Table 1-1, between LIFT and NSP:
MODU 1989 MODU Code as amended 1991
Under Code 371.2, change all entries in columns: 'Ship', 'Column-stab.' and 'Self-elevating' from: 1A1, OI to: MODU. Under Code 371.2, change all entries in columns: 'Tensionleg and 'Deep-draught' from: OI to: MODU.
Sec.3 Page 57 (Amended October 2001)
Sec.2 Page 7 (Amended October 2001) In Table 2-1, item 26, change first word in text to: Openings Sec.2 Page 10 (Amended October 2001) Insert new headline between headlines 70 and 701: 700 Drilling general Sec.3 Page 53 (Amended October 2001) Under headline 362.0 Bilge general, item Z090: Change contents of third column from: Y, FI to: Y, R, FI Sec.3 Page 54 (Amended October 2001) Under headline 363.0 Ballast general, item Z090: Change contents of third column from: Y, FI to: Y, R, FI Sec.3 Page 56 (Amended October 2001) Under Code 371.1, change all entries in columns: 'Ship', 'Column-stab.' and 'Self-elevating' from: 1A1 (NSP) to: MODU.
Z030 Local arrangement plan - Drilling area
Under Code 372.5, change all entries in columns: 'Ship', 'Column-stab.' and 'Self-elevating' from: 1A1 (NSP) to: MODU.
Under Code 388.1, change all entries in columns: 'Ship', 'Column-stab.' and 'Self-elevating' from: 1A1, OI to: MODU. Under Code 388.1, change all entries in columns: 'Tensionleg and 'Deep-draught' from: OI to: MODU. Under Code 388.2, change all entries in columns: 'Ship', 'Column-stab.' and 'Self-elevating' from: 1A1, OI to: MODU. Under Code 388.2, change all entries in columns: 'Tensionleg and 'Deep-draught' from: OI to: MODU.
Insert new headline between headlines 70 and 701: 700 Drilling general Insert under the headline 700 Drilling general:
Y DRU DRU DRU DRU DRU
Under Code 701, change all entries in columns: 'Ship', 'Column-stab.' and 'Self-elevating' from: 1A1, OI to: DRU. Under Code 701, change all entries in columns: 'Tension-leg and 'Deep-draught' from: OI to: DRU. Under Code 703, change all entries in columns: 'Ship', 'Column-stab.' and 'Self-elevating' from: 1A1, OI to: DRU. Under Code 703, change all entries in columns: 'Tension-leg and 'Deep-draught' from: OI to: DRU.
DNV-RP-B401: Cathodic Protection Design, January 2005 Sec.2 Page 8 (Amended October 2005) In the Sec.2 title, the word Normative has been deleted. Sec.5 Page 11 (Amended October 2005) A new item 5.8.3 has been added, and the succeeding items have been renumbered accordingly: 5.8.3 For large and complex structures like e.g. multi-well subsea production units, extensive use of coating is required to limit the overall current demand and to ensure adequate current distribution. The CP design procedure in this document does not account for a voltage drop in the seawater remotely from anodes. To compensate for this, the design coating breakdown factors to be used for CP design are deliberately selected in a conservative manner to ensure that a sufficient total final current output capacity is installed. As a consequence, any calculations of the electrolytic voltage drop away from the anodes (e.g. by means of finite or boundary element analyses) and using these coating breakdown factors may result in excessively high electrolytic voltage drops, indicating marginal or even insufficient cathodic protection in terms of the estimated protection potential. This will primarily apply to relatively long design lives when
the calculated coating breakdown, and hence current demands and electrolytic voltage drop increase exponentially. Sec.6 Page 13 (Amended October 2005) A new sentence has been added at the end of item 6.3.11 as follows: For internally heated components, the design current density shall be increased by 0.002 A/m2 for each C that the metal / seawater is assumed to exceed 25C. Sec.6 Page 14 (Amended October 2005) A new sentence has been added at the end of item 6.4.3 as follows: The coating breakdown factors as established in Annex A are based on considerations addressed in 5.8.3. Sec.7 Page 17 (Amended April 2005) Equation (3), in item 7.8.2 has been corrected as follows: N ( Ec Ea ) N E - = -----------------I c = N I a = -------------------------------Ra Ra
(3)
Sec.8 Page 21 (Amended April 2005) Item 8.7.3, has been amended to read: 8.7.3 Contractor shall issue an inspection document according to EN 10204 or ISO 10474, inspection certificate 3.1.B.
DNV-RP-C201: Buckling Strength of Plated Structures, October 2002 Part.1 Sec.3 Table 3.1 Page 9 (Amended April 2003) In Table 3.1, line for Longitudinal stiffened plate panel, column Clause reference replace 7 with 5 and 7. In Table 3.1, line for Girder supporting stiffened panel, col-
DET NORSKE VERITAS
umn Clause reference replace 8 with 5 and 8. Part.1 Sec.6 Page 11 (Amended April 2004) In the paragraph above figure 6-1, Chapter 0 has been changed to Chapter 10. Part.1 Sec.6 Page 12 (Amended October 2004) In item 6.5, after the sentence: x,Rd is given by eq. (6.1) and y,Rd is given by eq. (6.5)., a new sentence has been added as follows: In case of tension, apply fy/M. Part.1 Sec.7 Page 16 (Amended April 2004) In item 7.2, right column, line 4,Chapter 0 has been changed to Chapter 10. Part.1 Sec.7 Page 16 (Amended October 2004) In item 7.2, after equation 7.10, the following sentence has been added: p0 = 0 in case y,Sd is in tension along the whole length of the panel. Part.1 Sec.7 Page 17 (Amended October 2004) In item 7.4, equation 7.18 has been changed as follows:
Sd Rd = fy 3 M
Sec.1 Page 4 (Amended April 2005)
The following section has been added in order to clarify how this RP shall be used in Working Stress Design (WSD):
1.2 Working Stress Design
This Recommended Practice is written in the load and resistance factor design format (LRFD format) to suit the DNV Offshore Standard DNV-OS-C101. This standard makes use of material- (resistance) and loadfactors as safety factors. DNV-RP-C202 may be used in combination with working stress design format (WSD) by the following method: For the formulas used in DNV-RP-C202, including eq. 3.1.3, use a material factor M=1.15. The utilisation checks should be made using a modified permissible usage factor p=1.150, see DNV-OS-C201 Sec. 2 Table E1 for 0 and Sec. 5 Table C1 for .
Equation 2.2.7 has been corrected as follows:

= Q Q 1, Sd 2, Sd sin + cos rt rt
Q, Sd
(2.2.7)
Part.1 Sec.7 Page 20 (Amended April 2004) In item 7.7.1, right column, last paragraph,Chapter 0 has been changed to Chapter 10. Part.1 Sec.7 Equation 7.63 Page 20 (Amended April 2003) In limitation for use just ahead/ introducing formula (7.63) substitute the balancing sign within the mathematical expression from greater or equal to i.e. , replacing it with less than i.e. < . Part.1 Sec.8 Page 23 (Amended October 2004) The text in the paragraph before equation 8.21, has been changed as follows: If the y stress in the girder is in tension due to the combined girder axial force and bending moment over the total span of the girder CyG may be taken as: Part.1 Sec.8 Page 24 (Amended October 2004) Equation 8.21 has been changed to: CyG = 1.0 DNV-RP-C202: Buckling Strength of Shells, October 2002 Sec.1 Page 4 (Amended April 2005) Figure 1.1-1 has been changed:
X 1 N M1 r l Q2 L l l 2 x h s LONGITUDINAL STIFFENER RING FRAME T M2 P
Sec.3 Page 16 and 17 (Amended April 2005)
Under Section 3.9, in the paragraph below equations 3.9.5 and 3.9.7, fET has been corrected to fET.
Below equation 3.9.9, under the paragraph in the definition of lT, lT has been corrected lT.
DNV-RP-C203: Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures, August 2005 Page 3 Main changes (Amended October 2005)
In list items 26-29 under Main changes, the references to Appendix 1, 3 and 4 has been corrected to Appendix A, C and D, respectively.
Page 125 Appendix D (Amended October 2005)
The reference to 2.14 has been corrected to 1.4 in item D.10.
DNV-RP-C204: Design against Accidental Loads, November 2004 Sec.3 Page 14 (Amended April 2005)
The second equation in Section 3.7.2 has been corrected as follows:

R0 = 4c1M P l
Q1
plastic collapse resistance in bending for the member, for the case that contact point is at midspan
In Section 4.2, the formula for sc, has been corrected as follows:
a ) m = characteristic distance V 2g(1 w ) m v t 2 (1 +
m+a sc = = w Cd A p
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Equation 6.11 in Section 6.10.2 has been corrected as follows:

l 1 1 = + k k node 2EA
(6.11)
In the heading for 2nd column from the right, after the text Coating Material Qualification, the text and PQT has been added. This change has also been applied to all the other tables in Annex 1.
FJC/CFR Data Sheet No. 1B Page 17 (Amended April 2004) In item 2.1, Lap shear strength has been corrected to: 30 N/cm2 FJC/CFR Data Sheet No. 3A Page 25 (Amended October 2005) In item 3.1, row starting with Salt contamination, Third column has been changed to max. 20 mg NaCl/m2. FJC/CFR Data Sheet No. 3A Page 26 (Amended April 2004) In item 3.2, row starting with Hot water soak test has been corrected as follows:
by agreement by agreement
DNV-RP-F102: Pipeline Field Joint Coating and Field Repair of Linepipe Coating, October 2003 General (Amended October 2003)
In all references involving Section 4 in the printed issue, Section 4 shall be corrected to Section 5.
In the Sec.2 title, the word Normative has been deleted.

Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 15 (Amended October 2005)
Hot water soak test (FJC only) GBE/CW6 Part 1, App. E or other agreed procedure
according to standard
DNV-RP-F103: Cathodic Protection of Submarine Pipelines by Galvanic Anodes, October 2003 Sec.1 Page 5 (Amended April 2004) In item 1.2.2, the following sentence has been added after the first sentence: Subsea manifold systems connected to pipelines are, however, not included in the scope of this recommended practice. Sec.1 Page 6 (Amended October 2005) In item 1.3.1, the Guidance note has been deleted. Sec.2 Page 7 (Amended October 2005) In the Sec.2 title, the word Normative has been deleted. Sec.5 Page 8 (Amended October 2005) In item 5.2.2, a new sentence has been added to the Guidance note as follows:
For CP calculations, a minimum cut-back length of 0.20 m should be applied.
This is justified by the specific requirements to coating design and quality control of coating application in the referenced DNVRP-F102 and DNV-RP-F106; the ISO standard referring to the generic type of coating (e.g. fusion bonded epoxy) or purpose of coating (e.g. thermal insulation) and to (quote:) commonly applied industry standards. The constants recommended in Annex 1 are only applicable if the actual coating specifications are in general compliance with the referred DNV RP's. However, for certain combinations of coating systems (e.g. asphalt and coal tar enamel plus FJC based on tape or sleeves with infill), the CP system can readily be designed so that the current demands of both standards are fulfilled (see also Guidance notes to 5.4.1 and 5.6.9).
Sec.5 Page 9 (Amended October 2005) In item 5.3.2, the following text has been added at the end of the Guidance note: (See also Guidance note to 5.2.9). Sec.5 Page 9 (Amended October 2005) In item 5.4.1, a new Guidance note has been added as follows:
Guidance note: The total net anode mass calculated from eqn. (5) may be considered as an absolute minimum value. If a default anode distance of 300 m is adopted (5.6.1), typical bracelet anode dimensions will normally give a significantly higher anode mass to be installed. Any excess anode mass installed can be utilised as a contingency in case the calculated current demand was underestimated due to e.g. pipeline components not included in the current demand calculations, or unforeseen mechanical damage to the coating during installation and/or operation, or if the design life of the pipeline is extended. (For inclusion of contingency in pipeline CP design, see Guidance note to 1.2.1).
Sec.5 Page 8 (Amended April 2004) After Table 5-1, a new Guidance note has been added:
Guidance note: The design current densities in Table 5-1 are applicable independent of geographical location and depth but should be considered as minimum values. Based on special considerations, the pipeline owner may chose to specify higher design values than those in Table 5-1.
Sec.5 Page 9 (Amended October 2005) In item 5.2.9, a new Guidance note has been added as follows:
Guidance note: ISO 15589-2 recommends constants a and b in eqn (2) for general types of pipeline coating systems assuming that the reduction of current demand for CP (i.e. per surface area) is the same for linepipe and FJC (quote: field joints having a quality equivalent to factory-applied coatings). This RP, however, refers to specific combinations of linepipe and FJC coating and takes into account their relative surface area (eqn. 9). The calculated FJC coating breakdown factor may then be 3-30 times higher than for the linepipe coating. For certain combinations of parent and linepipe coating, the calculated overall coating breakdown using the constants in Annex 1 may be significantly lower than in the ISO standard.
Guidance note: For medium and long distance export pipelines with concrete coating, the concept of using pre-installed anodes and with a default maximum distance of 300 m is adequate for most purposes. (See Guidance note to 5.4.1)"
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Guidance note: Also the ISO 15589-2 encourages CP of short pipelines by anodes located at each end of the pipeline. To calculate the protective length of such anodes, this standard recommends so-called attenuation calculations contained in an Annex A. These formulas are fairly complicated and contain the pipe-to-electrolyte insulation resistance as the most critical parameter and which (quote:) should be selected based on practical experience. This RP, however, offers a simplified approach with specification of all required design parameters.
Sec.8 Page 16 (Amended October 2005) At the bottom of Tables A.1 and A.2 the following text has been added: Note: x100 in the heading of the two column to the right means that all figures in these columns have been multiplied by a factor of 100; i.e. before use in eqns. (2) or (4), the numbers shall be multiplied with a factor 10-2.
Sec.5 Page 10 (Amended April 2004) The equation in item 5.6.3, that wrongly has the number 7(same as the equation in 5.5.3), has been renumbered 8. The succeeding equations has been renumbered accordingly. Sec.5 Page 10 (Amended April 2004) In item 5.6.4, the Guidance note has been amended to read:
Guidance note: The length of cut-back refers to the corrosion protective coating. For cutbacks with length < 0.20 m, a default value of 0.20 m is recommended. With this default value, and for a pipeline section with all joints of 12 m length approximately, r = 0.033 and f'cf = f'cf (linepipe) + 0.033 f'cf (FJC).
DNV-RP-F105: Free Spanning Pipelines, March 2002 Sec.4 Page 21 and 22 (Amended October 2003) The abscissa title in Figures 4-1 and 4-4 shall be: Reduced Velocity Vrd (=Vr*f) DNV-RP-F106: Factory Applied External Pipeline Coatings for Corrosion Control, October 2003 Sec.2 Page 7 (Amended October 2005) In the Sec.2 title, the word Normative has been deleted. Sec.5 Page 10 (Amended April 2004) In the Guidance note in item 5.2.3, the text line spread has been changed to line speed. Sec.5 Page 13 (Amended October 2005) Item 5.9.4, has been amended as follows: 5.9.4 Contractor shall issue an inspection document corresponding to the requirements given in EN 10204 or ISO 10474, inspection certificate 3.1.B. Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 15 (Amended October 2005) In the heading for 2nd column from the right, after the text Coating Material Qualification, the text and PQT has been added. This change has also been applied to all the other tables in Annex 1. Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 16 (Amended October 2005) In item 3.2, row starting with Hot water soak test, the text in the third column has been changed to according to standard. Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 17 (Amended October 2005) In the first column, 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 have been changed to 2.1.3 and 2.1.4 respectively. Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 18 (Amended October 2005) In the first column, after 3.2.2 and 3.2.3, PP has been changed to PE. Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 23 (Amended October 2005) In the row starting with 3.2.1, the text CDS 3, 3.2 has been changed to CDS 1, 3.2 (four locations). Sec.6 Annex 1 Page 23 (Amended October 2005) In the row starting with 3.2.2, the text CDS, 3.2.2 has been changed to CDS 1, 3.2.2 (four locations).
Sec.5 Page 10 (Amended October 2005) In item 5.6.4, in the Guidance note, the word minimum has been inserted after ..0.20 m, a default. Sec.5 Page 11 (Amended April 2004) In item 5.6.9, the 2nd last paragraph, the text becomes 4L in stead of 2L is corrected to becomes L in stead of 2L. Sec.5 Page 11(Amended October 2005) In item 5.6.9, a new Guidance note has been added as follows:
Guidance note: The minimum anode distance (L) calculated from eqn (16) may be considered as an absolute minimum value and not an optimum distance. The definition of distance between bracelet anodes (i.e. other than the default value of 300 m recommended in 5.6.1) will be dependant on the anode design, the installation concept (onshore/offshore installation) and the minimum net anode mass required (see 5.4.1).
Sec.6 Page 13 (Amended October 2005) Item 6.7.3, has been changed as follows: 6.7.3 Contractor shall issue an inspection document corresponding to the requirements given in EN 10204 or ISO 10474, inspection certificate 3.1.B. Sec.8 Page 16 (Amended April 2004) A new row has been added at the bottom of table A.1 with the text: Note that the values for 'a' and 'b' in the two columns to the right have been multiplied by a factor 100. Sec.8 Page 16 (Amended April 2004) In Table A.2, FJC Type 1A, 3rd column from right, the text CDS no. 5 and 6 is corrected to CDS no. 5 and 6 with concrete. Sec.8 Page 16 (Amended April 2004) In Table A.2, FJC Type 2A, 3rd column from right, the text CDS no. 5 with concrete is corrected to CDS no. 2 with concrete.
DNV-RP-F107: Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection, March 2001 Equation (22) Page 27 (Amended October 2002) The equation should read: 1 F Coll_Riser = F Hit_Platform x -P j 4
j = Riser_i
(The righthand factors are to be multiplied rather than added.)
DET NORSKE VERITAS
DET NORSKE VERITAS

DNV Amend-Corrections October 2005

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DNV Amend-Corrections October 2005

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DNV OFFSHORE CODES

AMENDMENTS AND CORRECTIONS

DET NORSKE VERITAS

Amended Recommended Practices................... 20

Amended Offshore Standards ............................. 8

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DET NORSKE VERITAS

SECTION 1 CURRENT DNV OFFSHORE CODES

DNV-OS-E403 Offshore Loading Buoys DNV-OS-F101 Submarine Pipeline Systems

DNV-OS-F201 Dynamic Risers DNV-OS-J101 Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures

2001 June 2004

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DET NORSKE VERITAS

SECTION 2 AMENDED OFFSHORE SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS

DET NORSKE VERITAS

SECTION 3 AMENDED OFFSHORE STANDARDS

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DET NORSKE VERITAS

M = 1.20 for ULS Consequence Class 1 (CC1) and 2 (CC2)

Structural category Special Primary Secondary

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DET NORSKE VERITAS

pt - + t gh ref p e p d = p ------- inc

for p ld > p e for p ld p e

DET NORSKE VERITAS

0.75% D 1), but maximum 3.0 mm

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DET NORSKE VERITAS

Add the following new Table 12-1 b:

DET NORSKE VERITAS

Equation 12.4 shall read as follows: D t1 - ( SMYS f y, temp ) p d ------------2 t1 (12.4)

DET NORSKE VERITAS

F-load effect 1.11) 1.0 1.0

E-load effect 1.32) 1.0 1.0

DET NORSKE VERITAS

The first equation in item C302 has been corrected as follows:

The last equation in item C302 has been corrected as follows:

for 3.6 < for 5<

App.A Page 101 (Amended October 2004)

T 7 = 1.22 0.8 (1 0.68 ) sin (1 )

2 M z 2M z H '= + H2 + leff leff

DET NORSKE VERITAS

SECTION 4 AMENDED RECOMMENDED PRACTICES

DET NORSKE VERITAS

Sec.1 Page 4 (Amended April 2005)

Equation 2.2.7 has been corrected as follows:

Sec.3 Page 16 and 17 (Amended April 2005)

The reference to 2.14 has been corrected to 1.4 in item D.10.

The second equation in Section 3.7.2 has been corrected as follows:

Sec.4 Page 20 (Amended April 2005)

DET NORSKE VERITAS

Sec.6 Page 32 (Amended April 2005)

Equation 6.11 in Section 6.10.2 has been corrected as follows:

In the Sec.2 title, the word Normative has been deleted.

DET NORSKE VERITAS

(The righthand factors are to be multiplied rather than added.)

DET NORSKE VERITAS

DET NORSKE VERITAS

You might also like