Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UCG GTL and The Environment
UCG GTL and The Environment
01 Environment Series
This information sheet provides an overview of the potential environmental impacts and benefits of Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) and Gas to Liquids (GTL) technologies. Most of the impacts and benefits summarised below are described further in other information sheets.
CORPORATE SERIES UCG SERIES GTL SERIES ENVIRONMENT SERIES
that often arise with traditional coal mining. Compared with conventional coal to liquids or surface gasification for power, UCG eliminates the need for a surface gasification plant. Such plants are capital and energy intensive. Compared with conventional gas or coal seam gas production, UCG creates significantly more energy for the same land area, meaning UCG takes up a smaller space. When used for power generation, UCG syngas results in a 25 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared with coal-fired power stations. There are excellent prospects to implement carbon capture and sequestration for UCG technology, because carbon capture is integral to the process of cleaning the gas prior to later use.
>0.001%: Sulphur in GTL produced FT diesel, meaning onboard vehicle catalytic converters operate to maximum efficiency, reducing air emissions. 25%: Reduction in greenhouse 35%: Reduction in particulate
gas emissions when UCG syngas is used for power generation. PM-10 emissions when FT diesel is used in diesel engines.
Capture and Sequestration) equation that is already in place for GTL plants.
Benefits of UCG
Compared to coal mining, UCG eliminates the need for large scale soil and overburden removal and coal wash plants. This eliminates issues such as acid mine drainage, spoil dumps, coal fines storage dams, mining rehabilitation, fly ash disposal and methane emissions, when compared with coal seams that are traditionally mined. Once a UCG operation is finished, the soil profile remains intact and the land can be used again afterwards. This reduces the land use conflicts
mining can result in subsidence, there is a similar risk for UCG. The extent of the risk depends on coal seam thickness, depth to coal seam, strength of overlying rock and the width of coal extracted by gasification. Once these factors are understood, UCG operations can be designed to minimise the likelihood of subsidence. Lowering the water table Some groundwater is drawn into the UCG process and used in the gasification reactions. The extent of drawdown can be managed by selecting appropriate sites for UCG, through appropriate monitoring and control and effective water management and recycling.
www.lincenergy.com.au
Benefits of GTL
Diesel engines afford fuel consumption advantages over gasoline fuelled vehicles. Linc Energys UCG to GTL vision will increase the availability and application of diesel as a transport fuel in countries where its technologies are applied. FT diesel contains virtually no aromatics and sulphur. FT diesel can be used in existing vehicles and infrastructure. This means that there would be no need for complete replacement of vehicles, refineries and distribution systems if FT diesel was in widespread use. Burning of any hydrocarbons releases air emissions that can cause photo-chemical smog and contribute to health problems. The main health risk for Australians arises from particulate matter (PM-10) and hydrocarbon emissions. FT diesel is significantly cleaner burning than conventional diesel, resulting in substantially lower emissions of PM-10 and hydrocarbons. The widespread use of FT diesel would lead to significantly lower emissions of air toxins than conventional diesel. By producing fuel locally, there would be a reduction in shipping of crude oil into the country. This makes the overall supply chain more efficient and reduces the risk of ocean oil spills.
1. BHP Billiton, 2002. Case Study B20: Electricity Production Using Underground Coal Gasification (UCG). Newcastle, Australia. 2. Beer et al, 2000. Life-cycle Emissions Analysis of Alternative Fuels for Heavy Vehicles Stage 1. CSIRO Atmospheric Research Report C/0411/1.1/F2 to the Australian Greenhouse Office. CSIRO, Aspendale, Victoria. 3. Beer et al, undated. Comparison of Transport Fuels. CSIRO Final Report to the Australian Greenhouse Office on the Stage 2 Study of Life Cycle Analysis of Alternative Fuels for Heavy Vehicles.
Around 60 UCG trials have been conducted around the world. Two resulted in groundwater contamination. These trials were operated significantly outside the boundaries of what we know today to be safe limits. These sites were successfully remediated.
AUSTRALIAN HEAD OFFICE 32 Edward Street GPO Box 1315 Brisbane QLD 4001 AUSTRALIA p +61 7 3229 0800 f +61 7 3229 6800
UNITED STATES HEAD OFFICE 1200 17th Street Suite 2100 Denver CO 80202 UNITED STATES p +11 303 623 0510 f +11 303 623 0547
linc@lincenergy.com.au
www.lincenergy.com.au
LINC-ENV-01.2
Important disclaimer: Information contained in this information sheet is provided for information only and Linc Energy makes no warranties as to its accuracy and completeness. Use of information contained in this information sheet is at the sole risk of the user. Linc Energy has made reasonable efforts to ensure that information in this information sheet is accurate at the time of its compilation, however there may be inadvertent errors or omissions for which Linc Energy apologises. To the extent permitted by law, Linc Energy accepts no responsibility for any loss, damage, cost or expense whatsoever incurred by any person as a result of any use of or error or omission in or relating to, the information contained in this information sheet.