Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fuchs 1
Fuchs 1
J
C
(2)
The geometry of the setup, comprising a
segmented layer of eight transmitter electrodes, a
continuous receiver ring, and the screw, is shown
in Figure 4. Figure 4a shows the profile of the
setup with the denomination of the electrodes,
for better demonstration the grounded shield
Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Users Conference 2007 Grenoble
around the entire assembly is not shown in
Figures 4a and 4b.
(a)
(b)
Figure 4. 3D geometry model of the setup comprising
a segmented layer of eight transmitter electrodes, a
continuous receiver ring, and the screw in (a): Profile
with denomination of electrodes and (b): Oblique view
3.1. Determination oI the Fill Level
To estimate the impact of varying material fill
levels within the sensitive volume, the pipe
content is subdivided into ten equidistant,
horizontal fill levels. This discrete division is
done to avoid remeshing and the subdivision into
different FEM meshes when variable fill levels
are used errors due to varying element sizes are
hence avoided.
Filled domains of the pipe content are set to
r,mat
=4 in the subdomain settings while unfilled
GRPDLQV DUH VHW WR
r,air
=1. Since we are interested
in the behavior of inter-electrode capacitances
for increasing and decreasing fill levels at this
stage, the screw geometry is replaced by a
simplified rod in the pipe center. The boundary
conditions of the rod are set to ground potential.
The simplified geometry consists of about
48.000 elements and it takes less than 15 seconds
to calculate the solution on an Intel Core2Duo
computer with 2.4 GHz and 2 GB main memory.
Figure 5 shows simulation results for a specific
fill level: Figure 5a plots the permittivity
distribution (truncated for better visibility due to
the high permittivity of metal parts), Figure 5b
the distribution of the magnitude of electric
displacement and Figure 5c the cross-sectional
potential distribution.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 5. Simulation results for a given horizontal fill
level: Cross-sectional plots of (a): Permittivity
distribution, (b): Distribution of the electric
displacement and (c): Distribution of the electric
potential.
Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Users Conference 2007 Grenoble
The calculated inter-electrode capacitances
between receiver ring and transmitter electrode 1
to electrode 8 (electrode denomination according
to Figure 4a) are plotted in Figure 6 over the
material fill level. As can be expected, the two
bottommost electrodes are affected first by the
increasing material fill level. The topmost
electrodes feature an increase in inter-electrode
capacitance and hence in the measurement signal
for high fill levels only. Due to the slight,
clockwise inclination of the transmitter
electrodes (out-of-symmetry, compare Figure
4a), a delay between corresponding transmitter
electrodes can be observed in the simulation
results in Figure 6.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4
4.2
4.4
x 10
-13
Inter-Electrode Capacitances for Increasing Fill Level
Fill Level [mm]
I
n
t
e
r
-
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
d
e
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
a
n
c
e
s
[
F
]
Electrode 5
Electrode 6
Electrode 7
Electrode 8
Electrode 1
Electrode 2
Electrode 3
Electrode 4
Field Draining Effect
Field Draining
Effect
Figure 6. Inter-electrode capacitances between
individual transmitters and receiver ring for increasing
material fill level (denomination of electrodes
according to Figure 4a).
For low fill levels, only a thin material layer
exists in the vicinity of the two bottom
electrodes. A raise of the fill level then causes a
steep increase of the coupling capacitance since
the electric field from transmitter to receiver
electrode is predominantly coupled through the
material. However, when the material layer
becomes thicker, the capacitance between the
material and grounded objects in the sensor
(screw and shielding) goes up. As a
consequence, the electric field is partly directed
to grounded areas and kind of sucked off from
the receiver electrode (field draining effect). This
means that for a certain fill level the capacitance
between bottom electrodes and the receiver
decreases. Similarly for the top electrodes, a
drain effect can be observed before the fill level
reaches the most sensitive area of the top
electrodes. For the intermediate transmitter
electrodes (i.e. electrodes 2, 3, 6, and 7), both
effects are superimposed and therefore the
gradient is lower than for the bottom and top
electrodes, where coupling and draining effects
occur at different fill levels.
3.2. Determination oI the Screw Revolution
The revolution speed of the screw can also be
reliably determined by analyzing the motor
rotation speed that drives the screw. However, to
avoid expensive cabling and electromagnetic
disturbances caused by long cable duct through
industrial environment, an all-in-one sensor
solution for both revolution speed and fill level is
desirable. It is furthermore desirable to make use
of a non-invasive sensor principle that can be
easily implemented in existing screw conveyor
systems and that features a clear separation
between actuating and sensing elements.
The geometry model shown in Figure 4 is used
to estimate the sensitivity of the setup on the
screw rotation angle. Therefore, the grounded
screw is stepwise rotated in 5 steps and the
FEM model is solved for several screw rotation
angles using the electrostatic problem
formulation in Eqn. (1). The 45 rotation
symmetry of the setup is exploited for the
analysis of the screw impact on the capacitances.
For the calculation itself, the geometry is
subdivided into a tetrahedron mesh with about
105.000 elements in total. It took about 30
seconds to solve the problem with one rotation
angle on a Core2Due computer.
Figure 7 shows simulation results for one
specific rotation angle of the screw: Figure 7a
plots the permittivity distribution (permittivities
truncated for better visibility), Figure 7b the
distribution of the magnitude of electric
displacement and Figure 7c the cross-sectional
potential distribution. The obtained inter-
electrode capacitances between individual
transmitter electrodes and the common receiver
ring are plotted over the screw rotation angle in
Figure 8, following the denomination of
electrodes according to Figure 4a. It can be seen
that due to the helical geometry of the screw, the
signals differ in their phase and that a
capacitance variation of about 100 pF can be
expected.
Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Users Conference 2007 Grenoble
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 7. Simulation results for a given revolution
angle of the screw: Cross-sectional plots of (a):
Permittivity distribution, (b): Distribution of the
electric displacement and (c): Distribution of the
electric potential.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
1
1.5
2
x 10
-13
Electrode 1
Screw Rotation Angle []
I
n
t
e
r
-
E
le
c
t
r
o
d
e
C
a
p
a
c
it
a
n
c
e
[
F
]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
1
1.5
2
x 10
-13
Electrode 2
Screw Rotation Angle []
I
n
t
e
r
-
E
le
c
t
r
o
d
e
C
a
p
a
c
it
a
n
c
e
[
F
]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
1
1.5
2
x 10
-13
Electrode 3
Screw Rotation Angle []
I
n
t
e
r
-
E
le
c
t
r
o
d
e
C
a
p
a
c
it
a
n
c
e
[
F
]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
1
1.5
2
x 10
-13
Electrode 4
Screw Rotation Angle []
I
n
t
e
r
-
E
le
c
t
r
o
d
e
C
a
p
a
c
it
a
n
c
e
[
F
]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
1
1.5
2
x 10
-13
Electrode 5
Screw Rotation Angle []
I
n
t
e
r-
E
le
c
t
r
o
d
e
C
a
p
a
c
it
a
n
c
e
[
F
]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
1
1.5
2
x 10
-13
Electrode 6
Screw Rotation Angle []
I
n
t
e
r-
E
le
c
t
r
o
d
e
C
a
p
a
c
it
a
n
c
e
[
F
]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
1
1.5
2
2.5
x 10
-13
Electrode 7
Screw Rotation Angle []
I
n
t
e
r
-
E
le
c
t
r
o
d
e
C
a
p
a
c
it
a
n
c
e
[
F
]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
1
1.5
2
2.5
x 10
-13
Electrode 8
Screw Rotation Angle []
I
n
t
e
r
-
E
le
c
t
r
o
d
e
C
a
p
a
c
it
a
n
c
e
[
F
]
Figure 8. Inter-electrode capacitances between
individual transmitters and receiver ring over the
rotation angle of the screw (denomination of
electrodes according to Figure 4a).
4. Conclusion
This paper presents a FEM simulation-based
analysis of a capacitive sensor, intended for the
measurement of the revolution speed of an auger
in a screw conveyor as well as for the material
fill level of the assembly. Due to the use of
segmented transmitter electrodes, the sensor
features spatially resolving measurement.
Results from FEM show that capacitance
variations of the proposed setup will be suitable
to determine the material fill level and the
revolution speed of the screw. Simulation results
furthermore reveal that field draining effects due
to metal parts in the setup have to be considered.
5. ReIerences
1. C. Rorres, The Turn of the Screw: Optimal
Design of an Achimedes Screw, 'ournol of
Hvoroulic Engineering, 126, no. 1, pp. 72-80
(2000).
2. G. Pajer, H. Kuhnt and F. Kurth,
Stetigfroerer, VEB Verlag Technik, Berlin,
(1977).
3. A. Fuchs, H. Zangl, G. Brasseur, Mass
Flowmeter for Screw Conveyors Based on
Capacitive Sensing, Proc. of IEEE
Instrumentotion ono Meosurement 1echnologv
Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Users Conference 2007 Grenoble
Conference (IM1C) 2007, Warsaw, Poland, May
1-3, 2007 pp. 1-5 (2007)
4. A. Fuchs, H. Zangl and G. Brasseur, Method
and Device for a Reliable Determination of the
Massflow in Screw Conveyors, Austrion Potent
Applicotion A18832006.
5. H. Wegleiter, A. Fuchs, G. Holler and B.
Kortschak, Analysis of Hardware Concepts for
Electrical Capacitance Tomography
Applications, Proc. of the IEEE Sensors 2005,
Irvine, California, October 31-November 3,
2005, pp. 688-860 (2005).
6. L.K. Baxter, Copocitive Sensors - Design
ono Applicotion, Chapter: Proximity Detectors,
IEEE Press, New York, USA (1997).
7. M. Young, E. Pickup, R. Deloughry, T.
Hartley, S.A. Nixon and L. Barratt, Development
of a Variable Density Flowmeter for an
Industrial Application Using Tomographic
Imaging, IEE Colloquium on Aovonces in
Electricol 1omogrophv (Digest No: 1196/143),
pp. 14/1-14/3 (1996).
6. Acknowledgements
This work was partially funded by the
Austrian Science Fund through the Translational
Research Project number L355-N20.
Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Users Conference 2007 Grenoble