DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY COURSE SYLLABUS COLLEGE: RVR COLLEGE OF BUSINESS COURSE CODE: MANASCI CLASS DAYS AND CLASS

TIME:
MANAS CI MANAS CI MANAS CI MANAS CI MANAS CI MANAS CI MANAS CI MANAS CI K3 1 K3 2 K3 3 K3 4 K3 5 K3 " K3 # K3 GOZUN, BRIAN C. GOZUN, BRIAN C. VILLAR, EULA BIANCA J. SAREN, LORELEI L. COR!OBA, ENRICO LEE COR!OBA, ENRICO LEE KONG, YING CHIONG KONG, YING CHIONG

DEPARTMENT: DSI

TH TH M W M W TH TH M W TH

940 112 0 940 112 0 1 0 0 194 0 194 0 194 0

111 0 125 0 111 0 125 0 193 0 211 0 211 0 211 0

Y40 2 Y40 2 L31 L31 L313 L313 L313 L31

INSTRUCTOR:

Dr. Brian Gozun, Ms. Eu a Bian!a Vi ar, Ms. Lor" "i Sar"n, Mr. Enri!o Cor#o$a an# Mr. Yin% C&ion% 'on%

CONSULTATION (OURS: COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course (MANASCI ) MANAGEMENT SCIENCE) a 14-week course on the study of uantitati!e techni ues in "usiness decision- #akin$% The course co!ers &inear 'ro$ra##in$ #ode&s and its s'ecia& a&$orith#s( in!entory and 'roduction) and network (*E+T,C*M) #ode&s( decision-#akin$ theories and 'rocesses( and decision tree construction and ana&ysis usin$ #anua& and co#'uter so&ution #ethods% LEARNING OUTCOMES *LO+: -n co#'&etion of the course) the student is e.'ected to "e a"&e to do the fo&&owin$/ ELGA Effecti!e co##unicators LEARNING OUTCOME to 'resent in c&ass the a''&ication of uantitati!e #ode&s to #ana$e#ent decision #ode&s throu$h 'ro0ect 'a'er) case ana&ysis and "oard work to de!e&o' ana&ytica& thinkin$ and 'ro'er reasonin$ in the a''&ication of uantitati!e #ode&s to #ana$e#ent decision #ode&s% to ac uire the essentia& ski&&s for the 'ro'er use of uantitati!e techni ues in "usiness decision-#akin$ to identify the !arious #athe#atica& too&s used in "usiness decision-#akin$( to a''&y the theories of uantitati!e ana&ysis in so&!in$ "usiness 'ro"&e#s( to "e 'roficient in "ui&din$ uantitati!e #ode&s usin$ co#'uter software in "usiness decision-#akin$ to esta"&ish the ha"its of neatness and order&iness in 'resentin$ written so&ution to 'ro"&e#s to "e know&ed$ea"&e in usin$ the co#'uter softwares for uantitati!e #ode&s in o'erations research%

Critica& and creati!e thinkers

Technica&&y 'roficient and co#'etent 'rofessiona&s and &eaders

Ser!ice-dri!en) ethica&) and socia&&y res'onsi"&e citi1ens

Cha&&en$e the 2asa&&ian &earners to rea&i1e their fu&& 'otentia& in a''&yin$ uantitati!e techni ues throu$h creati!ity( inno!ati!eness( honesty( and 'erse!erance% Ensure that the &earners trans&ate know&ed$e) inno!ation) and creati!ity into so#ethin$ usefu& in actua& 'ractice for the "etter#ent of society and the Church% *re'are the &earners to 'artici'ate res'onsi"&y in the wor&d of work) fa#i&y) co##unity) nation and Church "y de!e&o'in$ !a&ues of honesty) 'atience) and 'erse!erance in the 'rocess of findin$ so&utions to 'ro"&e#s( and 3rin$ Christian 'ers'ecti!es to "ear on hu#an understandin$) ski&&s and !a&ues of the &earners throu$h rea&i1ation of the ro&e of uantitati!e techni ues in decision-#akin$ in ena"&in$ "usiness#en to "e #ore socia&&y res'onsi"&e%

FINAL COURSE OUTPUT: As e!idence of attainin$ the a"o!e &earnin$ outco#es) the student is re uired to do and su"#it the fo&&owin$ durin$ the indicated dates of the ter#% LEARNING OUTCOME 2- 1/ 'resent in c&ass the a''&ication of uantitati!e #ode&s to #ana$e#ent decision #ode&s 2- 5/ a''&y the theories of uantitati!e ana&ysis in so&!in$ "usiness 'ro"&e#s and to "e 'roficient in "ui&din$ uantitati!e #ode&s usin$ co#'uter software in "usiness decision-#akin$ 2- 7/ a''&y the theories of uantitati!e ana&ysis in so&!in$ "usiness 'ro"&e#s( esta"&ish the ha"its of neatness and order&iness in 'resentin$ written so&ution to 'ro"&e#s +ea&i1e of the ro&e of uantitati!e techni ues in decision-#akin$ in ena"&in$ "usiness#en to "e #ore socia&&y res'onsi"&e% RE,UIRED OUTPUT Case ana&ysis usin$ 4uantitati!e Methods (4M for windows software) *ro0ect 'a'er usin$ 4uantitati!e Methods (4M for windows software) DUE DATE At the end of each uantitati!e #ode& (see 2earnin$ *&an "e&ow) 6ina& e.a# day

4ui11es% 8o#ework,Seatwork) 6ina& E.a#

At the end of each uantitati!e #ode& discussion

+ef&ection 'a'er

At the end of each case study) students shou&d state reco##endations with consideration of cor'orate socia& res'onsi"i&ity tri'&e "otto# effect ('rofit) '&anet,en!iron#ent) 'eo'&e,society)

RUBRIC FOR ASSESSMENT: *PRO-ECT PAPER, CASE ANALYSIS . REFLECTION PAPER+ CRITERIA STRONG ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE 2EA' RATING / 0 1 3 9efine the Accurate&y Accurate&y Misinter'rets -ffers "iased 'ro"&e# inter'rets inter'rets e!idence) inter'retations of e!idence) e!idence) state#ents) $ra'hics) e!idence) state#ents)

state#ents) $ra'hics) uestions) etc% 9e!e&o' a #ode& Ac uire in'ut data Identifies the #ost i#'ortant ar$u#ents for choice of #ode& Identifies and $athers the #ost i#'ortant data suita"&e for chosen #ode& 9raws warranted and sensi"&e) conc&usions "ased on so&ution Thou$htfu&&y ana&y1es and e!a&uates #a0or a&ternati!e 'oints of !iew

state#ents) $ra'hics) uestions) etc% Identifies re&e!ant ar$u#ents (for choice of #ode& Identifies and $athers re&e!ant data suita"&e for chosen #ode& 9raws warranted conc&usions "ased on so&ution

uestions) etc%

6ai&s to identify stron$) re&e!ant ar$u#ents for choice of #ode& 6ai&s to identify and $ather re&e!ant data suita"&e for chosen #ode& 9raws unwarranted or fa&&acious conc&usions

$ra'hics) uestions) infor#ation) or the 'oints of !iew of others% 6ai&s to identify or hasti&y chooses #ode& 6ai&s to identify or hasti&y $athers re&e!ant data suita"&e for chosen #ode& 9oes not 0ustify resu&ts or 'rocedures) nor e.'&ain conc&usions I$nores or su'erficia&&y e!a&uates o"!ious a&ternati!e 'oints of !iew%

9e!e&o' and test the so&ution

Ana&y1e the resu&ts

-ffers ana&yses and e!a&uations of o"!ious a&ternati!e 'oints of !iew%

I$nores or su'erficia&&y e!a&uates o"!ious a&ternati!e 'oints of !iew%

RUBRIC FOR ASSESSMENT: REFLECTION PAPER

CRITERIA I#"n5i9i"s Di "77a Consi#"rs S5a:"&o #"rs Una!!"45a$ " 3 8as a !a$ue idea of what the di&e##a is and is uncertain what #ust "e decided Is unsure as to who shou&d "e in!o&!ed in the decision-#akin$ 'rocess A!!"45a$ " 1 Identifies the di&e##a) inc&udin$ 'ertinent facts) and ascertains what #ust "e decided 9eter#ines who shou&d "e in!o&!ed in the decision #akin$ 'rocess and accurate&y identifies a&& the stakeho&ders C&arifies at &east two a&ternati!es and 'redicts their associated conse uences in detai&% 6or#u&ates an i#'&e#entation '&an that de&ineates the e.ecution of the decision E6"74 ar8 0 9escri"es the di&e##a in detai& ha!in$ $athered 'ertinent facts% Ascertains e.act&y what #ust "e decided 9eter#ines who shou&d "e in!o&!ed in the decision #akin$ 'rocess and thorou$h&y ref&ects on the !iew'oints of the stakeho&ders C&arifies a nu#"er of a&ternati!es and e!a&uates each on the "asis of whether or not there is interest and concern o!er the we&fare of a&& stakeho&ders 6or#u&ates an i#'&e#entation '&an that de&ineates the e.ecution of the decision and that e!idences a thou$htfu& ref&ection on the "enefits and risks of action S!or"

Ana 8z"s A 5"rna5i;"s an# Cons"<u"n!"s C&oos"s an A!5ion

3e$ins to a''raise the re&e!ant facts and assu#'tions and identifies so#e a&ternati!es% 8as difficu&ty identifyin$ and a''ro'riate course of action fro# a#on$ a&ternati!es

OT(ER RE,UIREMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS: 4ui11es) Assi$n#ents and 9e'art#enta& 6ina& E.a#ination GRADING SYSTEM: 6ina& Grade 4ui11es - :;< C&ass Standin$) 8=,S=- :<

G+A9E *-INT E4>I?A2ENT @A%1;; 4%; @7%@B 7%: C@%@5 7%; C:%CC 5%: C;%C4 5%; A:%A@ 1%: A;%A4 1%;

*ro0ect *a'er Case study 6ina& 9e't% E.a# Tota&

- 1;< - :< - 7;< DDDDDDDD 1;;< *assin$ $rade is A;<

LEARNING PLAN: LEARNING OUTCOME

TOPIC -rientation

2EE' NO. 1

LEARNING ACTIVITIES 9iscuss *o&icies on case ana&ysis and 'ro0ect 'a'er% 6or#at for "oth out'uts is as fo&&ows/ 1% 9efine the *ro"&e# 5% 9e!e&o' the #ode& 7% Ac uire in'ut data 4% 9e!e&o' and test the so&ution :% Ana&y1e the resu&ts B% +eco##end courses of action to/ a% So&!e the 'ro"&e# "% Address cor'orate socia& res'onsi"i&ity usin$ tri'&e "otto# &ine fra#ework htt'/,,www%i"rc%indiana%edu,i"r,5;11, s'rin$,artic&e5%ht# 2ecture and discussion on/ -ri$ins of Mana$e#ent Science, -'erations +esearch Si$nificant contri"utions of scientists to -'erations +esearch Socia& +es'onsi"i&ity in 3usiness - 9iscussion of tri'&e "otto# &ine htt'/,,www%i"rc%indiana%edu,i"r,5;11,s'rin$,a rtic&e5%ht#& 2ecture) discussion and seatwork on/ Ste's in 9ecision Theory A''roach The Criteria for 9ecision-#akin$ under >ncertainty 9ecision-#akin$ under the condition of +isk E.'ected #onetary !a&ue and !a&ue of 'erfect infor#ation Mar$ina& Ana&ysis Case Ana&ysis usin$ 4M for =indows

Ensure that the &earners trans&ate know&ed$e) inno!ation) and creati!ity into so#ethin$ usefu& in actua& 'ractice for the "etter#ent of society and the Church%

Introduction to 4uantitati!e Ana&ysis E Cha'ter 1

To a''&y the theories of uantitati!e ana&ysis in so&!in$ "usiness 'ro"&e#s( to de!e&o' ana&ytica& thinkin$ and 'ro'er reasonin$ in the a''&ication of uantitati!e #ode&s to #ana$e#ent decision #ode&s% to a''&y the theories of uantitati!e ana&ysis in so&!in$ "usiness 'ro"&e#s( to "e 'roficient in "ui&din$ uantitati!e #ode&s usin$ co#'uter software in "usiness decision-#akin$

9ecision Theory E Cha'ter 7

4ui1 F1 2inear *ro$ra##in $ E Cha'ter A) C

4 4):

2ecture) discussion and seatwork on/ 2inear *ro$ra#s and 6or#u&ation Gra'hica& A''roach Case Ana&ysis usin$ 4M for =indows

4ui1 F5

to a''&y the theories of uantitati!e ana&ysis in so&!in$ "usiness 'ro"&e#s( to "e 'roficient in "ui&din$ uantitati!e #ode&s usin$ co#'uter software in "usiness decision-#akin$ to de!e&o' ana&ytica& thinkin$ and 'ro'er reasonin$ in the a''&ication of uantitati!e #ode&s to #ana$e#ent decision #ode&s% to a''&y the theories of uantitati!e ana&ysis in so&!in$ "usiness 'ro"&e#s( to "e 'roficient in "ui&din$ uantitati!e #ode&s usin$ co#'uter software in "usiness decision-#akin$ to de!e&o' ana&ytica& thinkin$ and 'ro'er reasonin$ in the a''&ication of uantitati!e #ode&s to #ana$e#ent decision #ode&s% to a''&y the theories of uantitati!e ana&ysis in so&!in$ "usiness 'ro"&e#s( to "e 'roficient in "ui&din$ uantitati!e #ode&s usin$ co#'uter software in "usiness decision-#akin$ to de!e&o' ana&ytica& thinkin$ and 'ro'er reasonin$ in the a''&ication of uantitati!e #ode&s to #ana$e#ent decision #ode&s%

2inear *ro$ra##in $ E Cha'ter A) C

A)C

2ecture) discussion and seatwork on/ Si#'&e. #ethods/ o'ti#i1in$ 'rofit and cost Sensiti!ity Ana&ysis 9ua& *ro$ra#/ for#u&ation and so&ution Case Ana&ysis usin$ 4M for =indows

4ui1 F7 Trans'ortati on Mode&

@ 1;)11

2ecture) discussion and seatwork on/ Trans'ortation *ro"&e#s - >sin$ NC+) Ins'ection,Greedy Method) ?AM - >sin$ Ste''in$ Stone and Modified Methods Case Ana&ysis usin$ 4M for =indows

*ro0ect Mana$e#en t - Cha'ter 17

15)17

2ecture) discussion and seatwork on/ *E+T,C*M E 9efinition Network 9ia$ra# Construction Critica& *ath -'ti#u# Co#'&etion Ti#e) S&ack ti#e Cost Crashin$ a 'ro0ect co#'&etion for the &east additiona& Case Ana&ysis usin$ 4M for =indows

to a''&y the theories of uantitati!e ana&ysis in so&!in$ "usiness 'ro"&e#s to "e 'roficient in "ui&din$ uantitati!e #ode&s usin$ co#'uter software in "usiness decision-#akin$ 3rin$ Christian 'ers'ecti!es to "ear on hu#an understandin$) ski&&s and !a&ues of the &earners throu$h rea&i1ation of the ro&e of uantitati!e techni ues in decision-#akin$ in ena"&in$ "usiness#en to "e #ore socia&&y res'onsi"&e%

4ui1 F4 *+-GECT *A*E+ 9AH

@ 14

*ro0ect 'a'er / 9ata ana&ysis of infor#ation $athered fro# co#'anies usin$ the uantitati!e ana&ysis a''roaches (choose one fro# decision theory) 2* $ra'hica& and si#'&e.) trans'ortation) *E+T-C*M) / 1% 9efine the *ro"&e# 5% 9e!e&o' the #ode& 7% Ac uire in'ut data 4% 9e!e&o' and test the so&ution :% Ana&y1e the resu&ts B% +eco##end courses of action to/ a% So&!e the 'ro"&e# "% Address cor'orate socia& res'onsi"i&ity usin$ tri'&e "otto# &ine fra#ework htt'/,,www%i"rc%indiana%edu,i"r,5;11, s'rin$,artic&e5%ht#&

6INA2 EIAMINA TI-N =EEJ

14

TE=T ) MATERIALS: +ender) 3%) Stair) +%) K 8anna) M% (5;;@)% Quantitative Analysis for Management (1;th ed%)% >''er Sadd&e +i!er) NG/ *earson Education) Inc% REFERENCES: Anderson) 9%) Sweeney) 9%) K =i&&ia#s) T% (5;;1)% Quantitative Methods for Business (Cth ed%)% Cincinnati) -8/ South =estern Co&&e$e *u"% 2e!in) +%) +u"in 9%) Stinson) G%) K Gardner) E% (1@@5)% Quantitative Approaches in Management (Cth ed%)% New Hork/ McGraw 8i&&% Tay&or) 3% (5;;A)% Introduction to Management Science (@th ed%)% >''er Sadd&e +i!er) NG/ *earson Education) Inc% CLASS POLICIES: *&ease refer to the student hand"ook%