Comments filed with Superior National Forest on March 25, 2014 in regard to a proposal to allow OHV use of FR 459/457 from Echo Trail to the Mudro Lake entry point of the BWCA Wilderness.
Comments filed with Superior National Forest on March 25, 2014 in regard to a proposal to allow OHV use of FR 459/457 from Echo Trail to the Mudro Lake entry point of the BWCA Wilderness.
Original Title
Friends of the Boundary Waters Comments on FR 459/457 Mixed Use EA
Comments filed with Superior National Forest on March 25, 2014 in regard to a proposal to allow OHV use of FR 459/457 from Echo Trail to the Mudro Lake entry point of the BWCA Wilderness.
Comments filed with Superior National Forest on March 25, 2014 in regard to a proposal to allow OHV use of FR 459/457 from Echo Trail to the Mudro Lake entry point of the BWCA Wilderness.
Thank you foi the oppoitunity to comment on the Nixeu 0se Pioject Enviionmental Assessment (EA). Ny name is Betsy Baub, anu I am the Policy Biiectoi foi Fiienus of the Bounuaiy Wateis Wilueiness ("Fiienus"). We aie an oiganization of neaily S,uuu membeis whose mission is to piotect, pieseive, anu iestoie the wilueiness chaiactei of the Bounuaiy Wateis Wilueiness anu the Quetico-Supeiioi ecosystem.
We also have a specific inteiest in the pioposeu action uue to oui involvement in the conveyance of the Chainsaw Sisteis site neai Picket Lake to the Foiest Seivice by special appiopiiation in 2uu9. The acquisition of this piopeity anu conveyance to the Supeiioi National Foiest (SNF) was in pait to piotect wilueiness values fiom uegiauation fiom 0Bv use. We aie conceineu the pioposeu action coulu contiauict these goals.
We aie commenting on the EA because of the potential to affect wilueiness values such as silence, anu the incieaseu potential of illegal off-highway vehicles (0Bv) incuisions into the Bounuaiy Wateis Canoe Aiea Wilueiness (BWCAW) fiom the pioposeu action. In auuition, theie is a ieasonable alteinative incluueu in scoping comments that shoulu have been analyzeu in the EA.
!" $%&'()* +,- ,**- .(,/&+-0./ 10/2 *3'*./*- %)*
The EA is contiauictoiy in its uesciiption of the puipose anu neeu foi the pioposeu action anu the iesponses to scoping commenteis. The EA uesciibes "the neeu to pioviue iecieational vehicle iiuing oppoitunities in an aiea of the Foiest wheie only shoit segments of ioau aie cuiiently open to motoiizeu vehicles such as all-teiiain vehicles (ATvs)." This iesults in a puipose "to pioviue a long uistance iiuing oppoitunity in the Echo Tiail coiiiuoi aiea on existing ioaus that woulu also connect to thiee othei shoit giavel ioaus cuiiently open to ATv tiavel (EA, p. 2)."
Bowevei, the EA uesciibes anothei puipose, the connection of existing spuis anu pioviuing access foi hunteis: "|aj long-uistance 0Bv iiuing oppoitunity woulu be pioviueu as uiscusseu in Chaptei 1: Puipose anu Neeu, by connecting FR 4S94S7 to thiee spui tiails. This oppoitunity woulu likely be useu in most cases by local iiueis uuiing hunting season (EA, p. 7)."
Responuing to scoping comments, Appenuix A uiminishes the likelihoou of this ioute being useu as a long-uistance iiuing oppoitunity:
Although the puipose of opening these ioaus to 0Bvs woulu be to pioviue a iecieational iiuing oppoitunity, it woulu not be expecteu to uiaw laige numbeis of iiueis because 0Bvs woulu neeu to be tiaileieu, unloaueu, anu loaueu again which in the big pictuie of 0Bv iiuing is a limiteu expeiience. Riueis woulu most likely be local people oi a few hunting camps that set up on public lanu in the fall who woulu enjoy the oppoitunity to exploie on authoiizeu ioutes oi move fiom place to place (EA Appenuix A, p. 2).
We uo not object to the puipose of cieating access along FR 4S9 foi local iesiuents anu hunteis, as the EA uesciibes. Bowevei, the neeu anu puipose of the pioject ought to be limiteu anu be consistent with this use.
Auuitionally, while the goal of connecting spui tiails makes sense in the context of the pioposeu action, it is not a goal that shoulu be applieu univeisally. Theie aie hunuieus of uisconnecteu spui tiails off of ioaus in the SNF. The impact anu value of connecting them shoulu be analyzeu on a case-by-case basis.
The EA iecognizes that SS1 acies of the BWCAW aie within one mile of the pioposeu action. This uistance is significant, as the 2uu9 Tiavel Nanagement Plan (TNP) EA Section S.9 notes that within this iange, auuitional sounu woulu be the most noticeable insiue the wilueiness. The Nixeu 0se Pioject EA also notes the iisk of noise impact to the wilueiness: "in auuition to highway legal vehicles, 0Bv coulu be heaiu in the BWCAW if the 0Bv tiavels noith towaius the Nuuio Lake entiy point on FR 4S7 (see Figuie 1). This woulu cause an auveise impact to oppoitunities foi solituue in the aiea." (EA, p. 8)
No expecteu impacts to wilueiness chaiactei aie uesciibeu in the poition of the pioposeu action along FR 4S9 that connect the thiee spui tiails, as this section of the pioposeu action is moie than one mile fiom the wilueiness bounuaiy.
As noteu uuiing comments on the 2uu9 TNP, the SNF has limiteu iesouices available foi enfoicement of illegal 0Bv use. This makes uecisions about ioutes, signage, anu euucation all the moie ciitical. Routing uecisions that cieate uestinations that teiminate at a wilueiness entiy point auu temptation foi uelibeiate incuisions, anu inciease the iisk of acciuental incuisions. See moie about this in oui comments below in #6.
A" :+.; (< -*).&0'/0(, (< 70/0=+/0(, 7*+)%&*)
The EA pioviues no uesciiption about how illegal 0Bv use woulu be uiscouiageu oi pieventeu at the Nuuio Lake entiy point. The EA neeus to uesciibe monitoiing anu enfoicement effoits as well as incuision-uiscouiaging methous to piotect the wilueiness fiom intentional oi unintentional incuisions.
B" C%7%8+/06* *<<*./) +,+8D)0) <+08) /( +,+8DE* '(/*,/0+8 <(& 8(,=F-0)/+,.* .(,,*./0(, G*/1**, HI !J9K +,- HI ABLMABN
FR 1uS6 is a Foiest Seivice ioau that peimits mixeu 0Bv use fiom neai Ceuai Lake to neai the wilueiness bounuaiy, south of Range Lake (Ely Aiea Notoi vehicle 0se Nap). As Appenuix A notes, theie has been pievious inteiest in connecting this 0Bv segment to the aiea of the pioposeu action:
The Foiest Seivice hau been contacteu numeious times about the potential foi 0Bv access on these ioaus when the piivately owneu anu opeiateu Chainsaw Sisteis Saloon locateu at the noith enu of FR 4S7 was in business. This piivate business offeieu a uestination that was fiequenteu by snowmobile iiueis in wintei with paities beginning oi enuing theii BWCAW canoe tiips at the Nuuio Lake entiy point. Riueis who iequesteu 0Bv access wanteu to access the Chainsaw Sisteis by connecting Foiest Roau 1uS6 (Cloquet Line oi Low Lake Roau) to FR 4S7 so that they coulu uepait Ely oi Winton anu iiue to this uestination. 0nce the Chainsaw Sisteis piopeity was solu anu tiansfeiieu to the Foiest Seivice, these iequests went away (2).
Theie is also an existing snowmobile tiail connecting FR 1uS6 anu FR 4S7 which passes thiough a veiy wet lowlanu (Peisonal Communication between Paul Banicic anu }ohn Pieice, Naich 24, 2u14.) The existing biiuge ovei the Range Rivei is uecommissioneu. The existence of this tiail cieates a potential ioute foi illegal ATv use foi people uesiiing to connect with FR 4S74S9.
The EA states "|tjheie aie no known auuitional pioposals in the aiea to open ioutes to 0Bv." (p. 9) Bowevei, given the high level of pievious inteiest in connecting FR 1uS6 with FR 4S7 foi 0Bv use, the pioposeu action coulu geneiate ieneweu inteiest in a connection that woulu cieate a long-uistance 0Bv ioute. The potential effects of such a ioute shoulu be analyzeu by the EA.
The Fiienus was involveu in the acquisition of the Chainsaw Sisteis piopeity in conjunction with the Tiust foi Public Lanu, leauing to the conveyance of this piopeity to the Foiest Seivice in 2uu9. This piopeity was acquiieu anu conveyeu foi the puipose of pieseiving access to the Nuuio Lake entiy point, anu to uiscouiage illegal 0Bv use.
The TNP iecognizeu that 0Bv tiails that enu at the wilueiness bounuaiy pose iisks foi illegal incuisions into the wilueiness. The TNP iuentifieu the uecommissioning of 0Bv ioutes neai the BWCAW as useful in uiscouiaging illegal incuisions into the wilueiness: "While theie has been anu continues to be illegal use of 0Bvs on the Supeiioi National Foiest, the potential foi negative effects is anticipateu to be less than the existing conuition oi no action alteinative unuei my uecision. The elimination of shoit spui ioutes anu usei cieateu ioutes by uecommissioning unclassifieu ioaus, the cieation of connecteu authoiizeu ioutes, /2* &*-%./0(, (< ('*, &(%/*) ,*+& /2* OPC5P, iipaiian aieas, anu aieas with sensitive soils, will ieuuce the potential foi effects fiom illegal use to wilulife, vegetation, soils, aii quality, wateisheu, Non-Native Invasive Plants (NNIP) spieau, heiitage anu wilueiness chaiactei. " (TNP Becision Notice anu F0NSI 2uu9, page S).
But the Nixeu 0se EA woulu cieate new 0Bv ioutes within a mile of the wilueiness anu biing this use iight to the wilueiness boiuei. This is inconsistent with the benefits of the plan outlineu in the iecent TNP. The uevelopment of the TNP map anu 0Bv ioute plan was a long evaluation piocess that sought to uesign "an 0Bv system that pioviues moie loops anu longei ioutes.." (TNP Becision Notice anu F0NSI 2uu9, page 11). A uetaileu map iesulteu fiom this uelibeiation that iesulteu in moie loops anu longei ioutes foi 0Bv use.
It is not cleai to the Fiienus why FR 4S7 anu 4S9 weie not incluueu in the TNP uelibeiations at that time, noi that theie is a compelling ieason to uesignate these ioaus foi 0Bv use touay. The EA shoulu moie thoioughly explain the compelling ieason to auu these as new 0Bv ioutes. If compelling ieasons aie founu, the Fiienus uiges the Foiest Seivice to consiuei the alteinative we uesciibe in this lettei to avoiu the wilueiness impacts that the TNP sought to avoiu.
N" Q5 )2(%8- +,+8DE* +, +8/*&,+/06* (< +88(10,= 703*- >?@ %)* (, HI ABL (,8D R10/2(%/ HI ABN .(7'(,*,/ST +) )%==*)/*- GD ).('0,= .(77*,/)
Buiing scoping, commentei Stephen Eiickson states:
I am also conceineu about the location of the fouith ueau enu ioau not shown on the map. I see 4S9 B, E anu u only. Boes it come off FR 4S7. Why is FR 4S7 being pioposeu to connect 4 ueau enu ioaus when the map shows no ueau enu ioaus coming off FR 4S7. I think FR 4S7 shoulu be withuiawn fiom the plan as shown (Appenuix A, p. 6).
The Foiest Seivice iesponse:
Theie is a veiy shoit spui neai the enu of FR 4S7. It shows up on the Ely Aiea Notoi vehicle 0se Nap (Nv0N) as TS-4S7F. Allowing 0Bv use on FR 4S7 woulu pioviue a iiuing oppoitunity to Pickett Lake foi those who enjoy a lake view oi a shoit stioll uown the poitage tiail the cieek into Nuuio Lake. (6).
Fiist, this comment is misclassifieu unuei "Non-issue comments oi questions." It shoulu be consiueieu unuei "Issues that uiive alteinatives." As Appenuix A notes, "|ajn issue that uiives alteinatives is baseu on extent of geogiaphic uistiibution, uuiation of effect, anu intensity of inteiest oi conflict geneiateu. Issues that uiive alteinatives aie analyzeu in uetail in the Enviionmental Assessment (EA)." This is cleaily a comment about extent of geogiaphic uistiibution of impacts. Commentei Eiickson is also suggesting an alteinative that shoulu be analyzeu by the EA.
Seconu, this fouith segment is not listeu among the spuis that woulu be connecteu in much of the EA, which specifically mentions thiee spuis (4S9B, 4S9E, anu 4S9u). This spui is 422 feet long (Nv0N Ely Aiea), anu no eviuence is piesenteu that theie is any significant use that iequiies the 0Bv mixeu use be extenueu past FR 4S9u.
Thiiu, othei sections of the EA uesciibe use conuitions that make a uestination of Picket Lake unlikely foi foiest useis. As noteu, the piimaiy useis aie likely to be local iesiuents uuiing hunting season.
Since all of the noise impacts to wilueiness occui as a iesult of the section of the pioposeu action past FR 4S9u, 0Bv mixeu use on FR 4S9 that connects the thiee significant segments wheie 0Bv use is cuiiently peimitteu (4S9B, 4S9E, anu 4S9u) achieves the puipose anu neeu, eliminates impacts on wilueiness, anu meets the likely uses uesciibeu in the EA (piimaiy use by local iesiuents uuiing hunting season.)
The EA notes that FR 4S9 is a "maintenance level" 4 ioau anu that FR 4S7 is a maintenance level S ioau. The EA notes that 0Bv use is typically not alloweu on level S anu 4 ioaus. While the EA iuentifies mitigation measuies to auuiess safety issues, the Fiienus is conceineu that mixing 0Bv use with highway vehicles on the same ioaus cieates uangeious conuitions. We note that the Foiest Seivice itself in the South Fowl Lake Snowmobile Access Pioject, iuentifieu mixing 0Bv use with highway vehicles as uangeious anu a ieason foi the pioposeu South Fowl Lake snowmobile tiail: "It is not safe foi snowmobiles to shaie the Aiiowheau Tiail (Cook County Roau 16) with cais, tiucks anu othei vehicle tiaffic. This uual use has leu to fatalities on othei Cook County ioaus, anu /2* H(&*)/ V*&60.* 2+) + 8(,=)/+,-0,= '(80.D (< )*'+&+/0,= ),(17(G08*) <&(7 20=21+D 6*20.8*). " (South Fowl Lake Snowmobile Access Pioject FEIS, page 1-7)
If the policy of the Foiest Seivice is to sepaiate snowmobiles fiom highway vehicles, the Nixeu 0se Pioject EA neeus to explain why this pioject ueviates fiom this policy, oi explain how ATv use is less uangeious than snowmobile use when mixeu with highway vehicles.
Thank you foi the oppoitunity to comment on the Nixeu 0se Pioject EA. Please auu me to youi email notification list foi this pioject. Ny email auuiess is betsyfiienus-bwca.oig. In auuition, please senu a haiu copy of youi uecision.