Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Worldview Made Practical Issue 2-22
Worldview Made Practical Issue 2-22
MarketFaith Ministries is an equipping ministry which is focused on helping Christians become more effective
in living out their faith in the midst of the increasingly diverse worldview environment of modern society.
About Today’s Article
It is an exceedingly exciting time at MarketFaith Ministries. It has been quite a process, but our new book on witnessing is
very close to arrival. Worldview Witnessing has already been sent to the printer, and now we are only waiting for the print-
er to do his work and ship them to us. We will keep you posted and let you know when we have them in hand.
As for today’s article, our current topic gets right at the heart of why an understanding of worldview is so practical. Who of
us hasn’t, at some time, been in a situation where someone was talking to us, or around us, giving all kinds of reasons
why our Christian faith is a fraud, or that some other belief was right? And who of us has not felt inadequate, at times, to
rebut what that person was saying? Most all of us have been there and it can be quite painful and frustrating.
Honestly, it does take some effort on our part to learn what we need to know to deal with that. But it is not that hard. To-
day we are laying out the foundation to deal with it. You need to understand that today’s article is not a complete educa-
tion on this topic. What it does, though, is lay out an outline for that education. Much of the more in depth information, to
fill in the blanks, can be found at the MarketFaith Ministries website at www.marketfaith.org. We hope that you will take
advantage of that resource in order to become stronger in your personal faith life.
(Continued on page 2)
The most effective way to quiet an opponent is to put them Getting at the “Truth” Issue
on the defensive. As Christians, for the most part, our ten- The bottom line of not having to be defensive is to know
dency is not to go on the attack in that way. We have this why our faith is the truth and why other belief systems are
desire to bring peace to the highest extent possible. On the not. The key to this emerges out of an understanding of
other hand, people who oppose Christianity often make it a worldview.
practice to bring up anything they can to try and put us on
the defensive. This article will not go into depth about the details of the
process of doing that. Today we are going to go in a slightly
As we consider how to deal with this kind of situation, we different direction and simply look at bottom lines. Since the
need to get over our reluctance to go on offense. This is not four foundational worldviews differ at such a fundamental
to advocate that we attack for the sake of attacking. In our level, it is possible for the actual truth about the structure of
Christian faith, the ends do not justify the means. It is not reality to be embedded in only one of them. Using a simple
okay for us to have an ugly attitude as we defend our posi- analytical method, we are able to quickly and easily figure
tion. But it is certainly possible for us to be confident that out which three of the four we can completely eliminate. We
our Christian faith is the truth, and to lovingly express that in will be able to do the same kind of analysis on the fourth
a way which keeps us from finding ourselves on the defen- one as well. But there are some additional nuances there
sive.
(Continued on page 2)
1
(Introduction - Continued from page 1)
We deeply hope that today’s article will give you more ammunition to help you “fight the good fight of faith” in your life. If
you find our resources helpful and feel compelled to help us move this ministry forward, you are welcome to send a tax
deductible contribution to: MarketFaith Ministries, 321 Anton Dr., Tallahassee, FL 32312. Oh, and feel free to contact
us any time with comments, questions and suggestions.
God bless,
Freddy
which require us dig a little deeper to help us discover why one particular faith (our Christian faith) is true and all of the
other beliefs within the correct worldview are not.
To give an initial summary, the three worldviews which do not contain the truth are Naturalism, Animism and Far Eastern
Thought. Theism is the worldview approach which contains the actual truth. But even within Theism there are many dif-
ferent belief systems, and only one of them can be true. As we examine the possibilities we will see why our Christian
faith is the most reasonable alternative. If we can reach a place where we are confident about this, we need never be on
the defensive again.
1. Determine which of the four worldviews categories the belief system falls into. This will help us later in our evaluation.
2. Determine the authority which the belief uses to support its conclusions. Every belief system has something that it re-
lies on to assert itself as the truth.
3. Determine what evidence exists for the reliability of the authority. There has to be some kind of evidence, and it is ei-
ther reliable or not. Something is used to support a system’s authority, and we need to know what that is.
Using these four steps, we can begin to determine the validity of the various belief systems. Let’s start with the three
foundational worldviews which do not, in any configuration, represent the truth.
(Continued on page 3)
2
(Never be Defensive - Continued from page 2)
for making that assumption. It dismisses, out of hand, any possibility of a supernatural reality, but does so based only on
the faith assertion that there is no supernatural reality. There is, simply, no evidence for this assertion.
On top of that, it is unable to use natural evidence to come to its conclusion – which it must if it is going to claim that the
natural is all that exists. It cannot account for the origin of the material which makes up the natural universe, the origin of
life, the origin of the many species of life forms, or the origin of human self-consciousness. It is entirely a faith position,
and adherents can do no more than assert that “this is true because I believe it is true.”
Naturalism simply has no basis for answering those who rationally assert another position. They cannot answer why their
rationally derived position is right and other rationally derived positions are wrong. Adherents do try to bring scientific ra-
tionale and evidence to the table, but unless they are able to use natural means to answer the questions above on ori-
gins, the evidence has no basis for acceptance.
This worldview position is typically asserted on the basis of tradition. Over the centuries, the beliefs and traditions have
been passed on, mostly orally, from generation to generation. The problem is, all of the evidence for this point of view is
anecdotal and is totally dependent on people believing the Animistic worldview. There is no external evidence that can be
brought to bear to back it up. People believe it because
that is what they have been taught growing up, not be-
cause of any kind of external evidence. There is no basis
for answering those who grew up with another set of tradi- Subscription Information
tions as to why their traditions are right and other traditions
are wrong. If you would like to receive Worldview Made Practical as a
free email subscription, simply go to www.marketfaith.org
Why Far Eastern Thought is not the Truth and click on the sign up link.
Far Eastern Thought asserts that reality is composed of an
ultimate impersonal life force which exists outside of the Past Issues of Worldview Made Practical are available
material universe. There are, though, elements of that life free of charge in .pdf (Acrobat) format in the archives at
force which are separated from the main body and are http://www.marketfaith.org.
manifested in physical reality. All of these separated pieces
are continually reincarnating to higher and higher levels
within the material universe on their drive to move closer to PERMISSION TO REPRINT: If you wish to reprint this
the main body, and ultimately reconnect with it. month’s article in your own print or electronic newsletter,
please include the following paragraph:
This worldview is primarily founded on human experience.
Once again, there is no external proof to back up the as- Reprinted from Worldview Made Practical; a free e-zine
sertions. There are numerous holy books and individuals produced by MarketFaith Ministries featuring practical
who have claimed to have special knowledge of all of this, teaching and life tools to help Christians become more ef-
but it is all based on their own personal experience of life fective in their faith life. Discover MarketFaith Ministries at
using Far Eastern Thought worldview assumptions. There www.marketfaith.org.
is no external evidence that any of it is true.
are, in fact, many Theistic belief systems, all which have their own unique understanding of ultimate reality, man and salva-
tion. All of them cannot be right. In fact, reality only exists as it exists, and everything else is not right. This is the only possi-
bility since every belief literally excludes every other belief concerning the essential matters of faith.
To properly address this, we really need to deal with each belief system individually. Obviously, in a short article like this,
that is not possible. We can, though, lay out some principles which can be used to eliminate all of the systems which do not
represent ultimate truth. If you apply these principles to understanding a non-Christian Theistic belief system, you will quick-
ly discern why it is not the truth. We will lay this out as a series of questions.
1. Do the teachings of the belief which relate to the nature and experience of humanity, match up with how human beings
actually experience life?
2. What positive evidence exists that a particular approach to understanding reality is right?
3. Is there valid evidence for the historical accuracy of a system’s authority source?
4. Is the authority source logically and historically consistent within itself?
5. Is there any kind of external corroboration that a particular approach to understanding reality is right (scientific, historical,
archeological, etc.)?
6. Are the founders and developers of the belief system trustworthy?
The fact is, all non-Christian, Theistic faith systems crumble at one or more of these questions.
First of all, every worldview literally contradicts every other worldview. If two elements from contradictory worldviews are put
into one system, you automatically have an internal contradiction. For example, God can’t be both personal and impersonal
at the same time. Man can’t be a sinner and not a sinner at the same time.
The first problem is enough, on its own, to disqualify a hybrid from being the truth. But there is a second problem that also
emerges. Each hybrid has its own history and authority which can be evaluated. In doing this, none of them are able to
pass the “validity” test.
1. Do the teachings of the belief which concern the nature and experience of humanity, match up with how human beings
actually experience life?
In fact, they match up perfectly! The Bible teaches that humans are personal, self-aware beings, that we are capable of
knowledge, that we have a sense of morality, that we experience the world as an objective reality, and that we have a tran-
scendent spiritual sense. We can’t deal with all of the evidence here, but these issues, along with many others, match up
perfectly with the way we, as human beings, actually experience life.
2. What positive evidence exists that the Christian approach to understanding reality is right?
There are many streams of evidence which point us to the truth of the Christian faith. There are such things as:
The Biblical teachings about man match up with actual human experience.
The textual and historical evidence for the accuracy of the Bible is very strong.
The evidence that Christ was who the Bible says he was it strong.
There is strong archeological evidence for the Bible’s accuracy.
The life of Christ stands the test of character.
The life of Christ matches up with the identity of the Messiah from prophesy.
There are literally scores of fulfilled prophesy in the Bible.
This list could go on, but this is sufficient to make our point here.
(Continued on page 5)
4
(Never be Defensive - Continued from page 4)
3. Is there valid evidence for the historical accuracy of its authority source (the Bible)?
The historical accuracy of the Bible is backed up by archeological research and by the sheer volume of manuscripts avail-
able from very early sources.
4. Is the authority source (the Bible) logically and historically consistent within itself?
The Bible is completely consistent within itself, in spite of the fact that it was written over a period of more than 1500 years
by dozens of authors. While there are still matters which have not been verified by archeological finds, incredibly, every ar-
cheological find which has ever been discovered, relating to matters in the Bible, has backed up its accuracy.
5. Is there any kind of external corroboration that the Christian approach to understanding reality is right (scientific, histori-
cal, archeological, etc.)?
There is strong scientific, historical and archeological evidence for the truth of the Bible’s information which is found outside
of the Biblical text itself.
Please understand that the answers given here are very incomplete because of space constraints. It is our intention only to
give you places to begin your own personal research. There are literally massive amounts of material that can be brought to
bear on each of these questions.
But you also need to realize that most people who attack the Christian faith will not understand the true nature of their op-
position until you force them to see it. Most people who tend to be against the Christian faith are looking for reasons why
they don’t have to acknowledge God, and are not nearly as concerned with the inconsistencies of their own beliefs.
Challenger: Your Christian faith is wrong because ... (science disproves it or there is no such thing as truth, or I believe in
reincarnation, or whatever).
Christian: I don’t believe that you are correct, but just for arguments sake, let’s say you are right. Since you don’t believe my
faith is the truth, tell me positively what you believe is the truth.
Once they do that, you are in a position to show them that what they believe is a faith position and that they have no stand-
ing to attack you and your beliefs. Using this approach you will immediately put them on the defensive about their faith. It
will become evident that it is wrong for them to be attacking you for your faith when they, themselves, are attacking from a
position that can’t be defended.
Of course, the ultimate reason for doing this is not simply to attack and beat another person. There are, certainly, those sit-
uations where that is all you will be able to do. The ultimate goal, though, is to share Christ with them. If you can create an
opening where they are willing to consider that they may not be right, it may then become possible for you to share the truth
of Christ with them.