Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Paper
Final Paper
The Transactional Relationship: Using An Aesthetic Reader-Response to Respond to Social Oppression A Review of the Literature Rachel Stark Wayne State University
Author ote This paper was prepared for RLL !"#$% taught &y 'rofessor (e)lase
The Transactional Relationship: Using An Aesthetic Reader-Response to Respond to Social Oppression A Review of the Literature
A&stract:
This paper e2plores using the reader-response theory within the te2ts of the literary canon in order to serve to further the ideals of a de,ocratic society. The focus of the discussion incorporates the issue of using the,atic literary te2ts to create an aesthetic reader-response in the transactional relationship found &etween te2t and student in the +nglish classroo, to counter the conte,porary issues of socioecono,ic inti,idation as well as the &roader pro&le, of &ullying so co,,only found to &e an increasing educational o&stacle within our schools. The rationale of this e2ploration is thus: )y utili3ing literature to pro,ote a sense of social acceptance within the classroo,% our efforts will inevita&ly yield to future generations &eing ,ore prepared to critically e2a,ine the world around the, and reflect on the lessons societal issues offer to positively refor, and contri&ute to the progression of our de,ocratic society. While argu,ents have &een ,ade to 4ustify choosing &etween classical literature and young adult literature to fulfill this end% for the purposes of this paper% the concentration will rest pri,arily with the adoption of classical literature within curricula and the use of young adult literature to supple,ent these efforts.
*As teachers of +nglish language arts% we have the responsi&ility to help students clai, the power of words to heal% to protect% and% as -ippocrates would put it% to do no har,./0
5n his acclai,ed work% *Still Separate% Still Une1ual%/ 6onathan 7o3ol 8#$$9: presents oftenti,es stunning and shocking evidence to indicate the socioecono,ic disparity &etween students in certain school districts representing pro,inent locations and others found within ur&an poverty-stricken areas. 5n 7o3ol;s 8#$$9: work% he refers to this current educational cli,ate as *A,erica;s educational apartheid/ 8p. <0: and appeals to the reader;s aesthetic e2perience with his te2t in an effort to advocate refor,. At the ti,e of the pu&lication date of this article% 7o3ol cited that the difference in financial allocation for ur&an school districts versus their rural counterparts were astrono,ical and current research indicates that the disparity has re,ained very ,uch to a si,ilar degree. 5n #$$9% the *per-pupil spending level in ew =ork >ity schools ?was@ A00%!$$% which ,ay &e co,pared with a per-pupil spending level in e2cess of A##%$$$ in the well-to-do su&ur&an district of Banhasset% Long 5sland/ 87o3ol% #$$9% p. <9:. 'erhaps the ,ost captivating portion of the 7o3ol 8#$$9: te2t is his following interview with Barina Warner who, his cites as a pro,inent *essayist and novelist who has written ,any &ooks for children/ 87o3ol% #$$9% p.<9:: There are e2pensive children and there are cheap children% 4ust as there are e2pensive wo,en and cheap wo,en. The govern,entally ad,inistered di,inished in value of the children of the poor &egins even &efore the age of five or si2% when they &egin their years of for,al education in the pu&lic schools. 5t starts during their infant and toddler years% when hundreds of thousands of children of the very poor in ,uch of the United States are locked out of the opportunity for preschool education for no reason &ut the accident of &irth and &udgetary choices of the govern,ent% while children of the privileged are often given verita&le feasts of rich develop,ental early education.C The &road societal issue that needs to &e addressed with this discussion is the funda,ental disparity and oppression of those caught within the poverty of the ur&an socioecono,ic class while their wealthy and pro,inent counterparts can afford *the ,ost e2clusive of the private preschools in ew =ork% which are known ?D@ as E)a&y 5vies%; ?and@ cost as ,uch as A#<%$$$
3 Kozol, 2005, p. 46
for a full-day progra,/ 87o3ol% #$$9% p. <F:. 5t is very ,uch a natural assu,ption that hu,an &eings continue forward in the footsteps of their predecessors unless they are a&le to learn to adopt new philosophies and ways of organi3ing their societies. One of the safest environ,ents for new generations to e2peri,ent with new ideas and ways of living is in the classroo, and it is one of our ,ost pivotal responsi&ilities as educators to provide the, with such an opportunity. An avenue to ,ini,i3ing and ,oving toward eradicating the social pro&le,s we face as illustrated &y 7o3ol 8#$$9: is to introduce students to a ,yriad of new philosophies and other individuals who are different than the, in socioecono,ic status% ethnicity% religion% e2perience% etcG in this sense% literature provides us with an innu,era&le cast of characters to fulfill this end of contructing a generation who does not oppress another individual &ased on these differences.
+ducators in literature classroo,s are placed at an advantage when ,ade privy to the insight of Rosen&latt;s 80HF9: theory. 5n her work% Rosen&latt 8#$$9: argues the following: Kenerations of young people now in school and college will have to ,eet conditions and pro&le,s very different fro, those their parents and grandparents faced. (uring periods of relative sta&ility or e2tre,ely slow social change% the ho,e and the co,,unity could &e relied on to furnish the e,otional conditioning and attitudes that would auto,atically fit the kind of society the child was eventually free fro, the responsi&ility of influencing character and ,ental ha&its. 5n a sta&le society% however% that influence would principally &e a reinforce,ent of attitudes ac1uired &y the child outside of school.< Kiven these facts% one of the initial paths to refor,ing the gross in4ustice discussed in 7o3ol;s work% &ased on socioecono,ic status 8as well as other factors including ethnicity: is to prevent and eradicate these attitudes found within our schools &etween peers. While there are a ,yriad of social pro&le,s found within schools that atte,pt to refor, students; philosophies and &ehaviors to &eco,e ,ore tolerant and e,pathetic toward their peer counterparts% a not-so-su&tle avenue of creating a literary environ,ent where young people can learn to e,pathi3e with others different fro, the, is also an approach offering &eneficial results to ,eet the sa,e goal. Jor instance% in ,y own e2perience as a teacher% 5 was faced with a very ho,ogeneous group of students who had little to no e2posure to those who offered differing opinions% &eliefs% creeds% or cultures. 5n ,y curriculu,% 5 worked with literary classics such as Austen to e2pose ,y own students; stereotypes and pre4udiced thinking. There is a rising ,ove,ent with +nglish +ducation to e2pel ,uch of the literary canon fro, the standard% accepted curriculaG however% total &anish,ent of these classic te2ts will result in the students; ina&ility to e,pathi3e with characters who are oppressed &ecause of their socioecono,ic class% race% or gender--crucial lessons within that transactional relationship which could serve as the foundation for progressing society.
5nterestingly as well% the results of this study were two-foldG not only did students reflect on their own conclusions that indeed% *old plays and storiesD can have an i,pact on our life today%/F &ut the teacher involved in the study *co,,ented that she was ,ost a,a3ed at the connections the students readily ,ade fro, classical literature to conte,porary issues. She also was stunned at how well they Egot; the whole Othello story &y viewing only clips and reading only key scenes of a play not in the curriculu,!/ 86ohnson% Augustus% Aigro% #$0#% p. F0:. 'erhaps though% the ,ost insight can &e derived fro, the authors recogni3ition of a teacher;s de,anding routine: *While ti,e is always an issue% connecting ?classical literature@ curriculu, with conte,porary issues can help us address ,ultiple topics% efficiently and effectively engaging students in real-world pro&le,s and solutions to &ullying/ 86ohnson% Augustus% Aigro% #$0#% p. F#:. -owever% this would not &e the case if teachers did not consciously adopt Rosen&latt;s 80HF9: theory of the transactional relationship of literature. The research study discussed in the work% *'revalence of &ullying and victi,i3ation a,ong children in early ele,entary school: (o fa,ily and school neigh&ourhood socioecono,ic status ,atterM/ written &y '. 6ansen% Lerlinden% (o,,isee-van )erkel% Bieloo% +nde% Leenstra% Lerhulst% W. 6ansen% and Tie,eier% further e2tends this argu,ent of the interplay &etween &ullying and socioecono,ic status. The authors contend the following: 5t is i,portant that children with an increased risk of &eco,ing a &ully or victi, are identified at a young age so as to facilitate ti,ely prevention of &ullying and victi,i3ation. 5dentification is enhanced &y knowledge on deter,inants and predictors of &ullying &ehaviour. 'reviously% studies on deter,inants of &ullying ,ainly focused on individual traits of children and on the influence of parenting styles. Jor instance% &ullies often have an i,pulsive and do,inant te,pera,ent and are fre1uently e2posed to harsh child-rearing practices at ho,e. Recently% considera&le attention has &een paid to socioecono,ic predictors of school &ullying. This has led to the postulation that involve,ent in &ullying &ehaviour ,ight e2plain part of the socioecono,ic disparities in ,ental health pro&le,s. Jor instance% it has &een shown that adolescents fro, fa,ilies
6 as stated by the student Ava in the work of Johnson, Augustus, and Aigro, 2012, p. 61 7 emphasis added
with a lower socioecono,ic status 8S+S: are ,ore often victi,i3ed and face ,ore severe long-ter, ,ental health conse1uences of this victi,i3ation as co,pared to victi,s fro, ,ore affluent social &ackgrounds. Other studies have confir,ed that victi,i3ation rates were higher a,ong children with a low socioecono,ic &ackground as indicated &y their parents; low-skill occupations or low educational attain,ent% lack of ,aterial resources% and single parenthood. Like victi,i3ation% &ullying see,s to &e socially patterned &y parental socioecono,ic status as well." This innate relationship &etween &ullying and socioecono,ic status ,ay &e circu,vented with the social progra,s instituted in schoolsG however with the advent of &udgetary reductions which are often seen to &e in increasing co,,onality and degree due to the current econo,ic conditions% lends itself to the i,portance of utili3ing the natural curriculu, resources of the classroo, to serve as a foundational &asis for allowing students interaction with te2t &y ,eans of Rosen&latt;s 80HF9: transactional relationship.
discri,ination on the grounds of race% class% se2ual orientation or personalityG issues that filter into adolescent culture. -igh schools are thus portrayed as totalitarian ,icrocos,s where &ullying functions as a ,eans of social control% cur&ing deviance fro, ,asculine% heterose2ual% ,iddle- class and white nor,s. The narrative techni1ues and the,es of these &ooksNaround ho,opho&ia% 4ock culture% ra,page shootings and girl-onOgirl violenceNwill &e e2a,ined.
Works >ited: 6ansen% '. W.% Lerlinden% B.% (o,,isse-van )erkel% A.% Bieloo% >.% van der +nde% 6.% Leenstra% R.% Lerhulst% J. >.% P Tie,eier% -. 8#$0#:. 'revalence of &ullying and victi,i3ation a,ong children in early ele,entary school: (o fa,ily and school neigh&ourhood socioecono,ic status ,atterM. )B> 'u&lic -ealth% <H<80#:. 6ohnson% A. ).% Augustus% L.% P Agrio% >. '. 8#$0#:. )eyond &ullying: 'airing classics and ,edia literacy. +nglish 6ournal% 0$08F:% 9F-FC. 7o3ol% 6. 8#$$9:. Still separateG still une1ual. <0-9C. Lope3-Ropero% L. 8#$00:. E=ou are a flaw in the pattern;: (ifference% autono,y and &ullying in y.a. fiction. Springer Science )usiness Bedia% 0<9-09!. Rosen&latt% L. B. 80HF9:. Literature as e2ploration. ew =ork: The Bodern Language Association of A,erica.