Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Megan Hali Ray PHIL 1000 018 Moral Philosophy of The Universalist Alexander Izrailevsky
Megan Hali Ray PHIL 1000 018 Moral Philosophy of The Universalist Alexander Izrailevsky
http://meganhseportfolio.weebly.com/
ImmanuelKantwasaGermanphilosopherduringtheEnlightenmenteraofthelate 18thcentury.HewasbornonApril22,1724,inKonigsberginwhatwasthenknownas EastPrussia,whichisnowKaliningradintheformerSovietUnion.Hewasborntoparents thatwerenotwealthybutweredevoutmembersofafundamentalistProtestantsectknown asPietism.Pietistsrejectedtheideaofimposingachurchandpriestsbetweenthe individualandGod.TheypreferredtorelyonimmediatepersonalappealtoGod.This religionputanemphasizedonfaithandrepentance. ImmanuelKantwaswelleducatedfirst,attheageof8ataschoolthatwasfounded byalocalpreacherthatwasincrediblestrict.ItwasaPietismschoolwithastrongreligious influenceintheeducation.ImmanuelKantlaterinlife,admittinghisresentmentforthe schoolsheavyemphasisonatheologyofterrorandpietyfearofhellandtremblingbefore avisionofawrathfulGod.Evenafterthishemaintainedarespectforhisparentsreligion. Attheageof16,ImmanuelKantstartedstudyingattheUniversityofKonigsberg.He studiedatthisUniversityfor6years,afterwhichhereceivedanofferajobtobeaLutheran minister,whichheturneddowntocontinuehisstudies.Hesupportedhimselfforthenext nineyearsbytutoring.In1755,ImmanuelKantreceivedwhatwouldnowbeadoctoral degree.Thisallowedhistoearntheprivilegeoflecturingattheuniversityasa Privatdozent,whichisaprivateteacherwhosesalaryispaidbythestudents.Hebecamea verypopularlecturerandin1770theuniversityhiredhimasaprofessoroflogicand metaphysics.Thiswasanimprovementinhisstatus,whichpleasedhimeventhoughthe salarywassmall.
ImmanuelKantdidnottravelveryfarfromhisbirthplaceduringhisentirelife,nordid heevermarry.Helivedaveryscheduledlife.Hewasaveryprolificwriter.Hisrevolutionary worksincludedCritiqueofPureReason(1781andasecondeditionin1787), ProlegomenatoAnyFutureReason(1783),FoundationsoftheMetaphysicsofMorals (1785),CritiqueofPracticalReason(1788),CritiqueofJudgment(1790),andReligion WithintheLimitsofReasonAlone(1793).TheCritiqueofPureReasonisoneofthe mostdifficultreadseverwritten.Intheconclusiontohissecondcritique,theCritiqueof PracticeReasonof1788,ImmanuelKantfamouslywrote,Twothingsfillthemindwith evernewandincreasingadmirationandawethemoreofferandmoreenduringlyreflection isoccupiedwiththem:thestarryheavensabovemeandthemorallawwithinme.This mottocouldjusthavejustaswellservedforvirtuallyallofImmanuelKantsphilosophical works. ImmanuelKantisknownastheUniversalist.HelivedinthesametimeasDavid Hume,theScottishSkeptic,andJohnStewartMills,theUtilitarian.Inagehewasin betweenthetwobuthisphilosophywasrevolutionaryandfitsbetterafterboththatofDavid HumeandJohnStewartMills.Inhisepistemologyhestatesthatbothofthephilosophiesof HumeandMillsweretooextreme.Hisepistemologywasabridgeofthetwophilosophies. Thetrueheartofhisphilosophyliesinhismoralphilosophy. Wedonotneedscienceandphilosophytoknowwhatweshoulddotobe honestandgood,yea,evenwiseandvirtuous.ImmanuelKant
Sosharplyandclearlymarkedaretheboundariesofmoralityand selflovethateventhecommonesteyecannotfailtodistinguishwhether athingbelongstooneortheother.ImmanuelKant ThemoralphilosophyofImmanuelKantputspracticalreasonoverthatoftheoretical reason,thisinvolvesthefactthatitisnotenoughinlifetojustbebooksmart,youmustalso havelifeexperience,goodtaste,andanintellectualintuition.Theoreticalreason,which includesscientificreasoning,isconfinedtotheempirical,phenomenalworld.Our interactionswiththeworldofexperiencesproducelawsofhumanbehaviorsthatforce reasontovieweverythingmechanically.Thismeansthattheoreticalreasonofhumans,like allphenomena,aregovernedbycauseandeffectintheformofinescapablelawsofnature. Therearenofreedomswhenitcomestotheoreticalreasonorlaws.Practicalreasonis usedtomovebeyondthephenomenalworldtothemoralworld.Practicalreasonbegins withourknowledgeaboutmoralconductandproducesreligiousfeelingsandintuitions.It helpsustodealwithmoralfreedomsthatarepartofourfreewill.InhisCritiqueofPractical Reason,ImmanuelKantsaysthatnomatterhowmanynaturalcausesandsensations mightdriveaperson,theycannotproduceastateofbeingunderobligations,theycannot accountformoralduty.Thefeelingofmoraldutycomesfromwithinitcomefrombeing rational. Hisideasofthestructureofthethinginvolvestwosections.Thephenomena,which isthestructureofthethingthatwecanknow,andthenoumena,whichisthestructureofthe
thingswecannotknow.Thisisastructurethatplacesthingsintothetwodifferent categoriesofwhatwecanandcannotknow,althoughwewillnevertobeabletoknow anythingtothefullestbecausetherewillalwaysbeanunknow.Therearethreeideasthat aretranscendentalwhichareGod,theUniverse,andtheSelf.Theseareideasthatdonot giveusknowledgeofthethingsbutonlygiveusaguess,orahopeoftheknowledge.In contrasttoDavidHumesphilosophybecausehefoundtheseideastobemeaningless, whereImmanuelKantsishopeful.Hisphilosophyisthatweareslavesphenomenallyand freenoumenally,noumenallyisourfreewill. Ourmoralityisbasedonreason,notonouremotionsaccordingtoImmanuelKant, becauseourreasonismoreinvolvedwhereouremotionsarealwaysbasedonthe situationandcircumstance.SimilartoReneDescartes,ImmanuelKantfollowwithhis beliefinapriori,whichisthatwearebornwithlogicimprintbutthenaddsagiftthatwe receivefromtheGod,whichisbothalogicalstructureandamoralstructure.Whenitcome toourmorality,ImmanuelKantsaysthatyoumustjudgeorbejudgebasedonyour intentionsnotupontheresultsofouractions.Thisistosaythatifyouhavepositivemoral intentions,oranyintentionsiftheresultendsupbeingoppositeornotquiteasyouplanned youstillneedtobejudgeuponthemoralityofyourintentions. Whenwearefacedwithamoralissueorquestion,ImmanuelKantseethree choicesthatwecanmakeMoral,Immoral,andAmoral(nonmoral).TofurtherexplainthisI willuseareallifeexampletoputmoreofaconcreteimageinplace.Thisexamplecomes fromalecturefromProfessorAlexanderIzrailevsky,thenrightafterthelecturethisscenario happenedtome.AfterclassIwasapproachedbyaclassmatewhohadmissedthelast
twolectures.Theexamplewereceivedinclasswasaboutreceivingarequestfroma fellowstudenttocopynotesandwhatImmanuelKantsmoraloptionswouldbe.Ihadthe threepreviouslymentionedmoraloptionsforherrequest. Theimmoralanswerwouldbetotellherno,withorwithoutgivingherareason.Ihad thenotesanditwouldnottakemuchtimetoallowhertotakeafewpicturesofmynotesso tellinghernowouldbeimmoraltonothelpheroutwiththissmallfavor.Theamoral (nonmoral)responsewouldbeformetosayyes,youcantakepicturesofmynotesbutit isgoingtobeadollarapage.Amoralisatransactionalorbusinesslikeresponsewhere yesyouarehelpingwhichismoralbutyouareexpectingordemandingreimbursementfor yourservice.Helpinginanamoralwayisaneutrallymoralopinionbecauseyouare assistingbutitisalsooktoaskforsomethinginreturn.Themoralanswertothequestion, whichistheoptionIchoseinthissituation,istohelpout.Iallowedhertotakeseveraland asmanypicturesasshewantedofmynotesfromthelectureswithnoobligationsofany sort. Avital,andthepartofImmanuelKant'smoralphilosophythatcaughtmyattention andmademewhattofurtherstudyintoitisthecategoricalandpracticalimperatives.The categoricalimperativeistoActasifthemaximofyouractionweretobecomeaUniversal Law.ThisidearemindsmeofthegoldenrulethatIwastaughtasachild,Dountoothers asyouwouldhavethemdountoyou,whichisactinglikeyouwantotherstoact.The categoricalimperativeisacommandthatisuniversallybindingonallrationalcreatures.It alonecanguidethegoodwill.Ourmoraldutymustbeuniversally,notconditionallybinding.
ThepracticalimperativeistoActinsuchawaythatyoualwaystreathumanity whetherinyourownpersonorinthepersonofanother,neversimplyasameansbut alwaysatthesametimeasanend.AlsowordedasActasiftheotherpersonwerenot onlyameans,butagoalofyouractionaswell,thismeansthatyoushouldnottryto manipulateotherforyourselforyourpersonalgainbecausetheyarenottoolsforyour happiness,butinsteadyoushouldthinkoftheirhappinessandgoals.Youneedtohelp othersnotjustyourself,andmakesureyouarenotusingthemforselfishpurposes. AnotherimperativethatIfoundduringmyresearchisthehypotheticalimperative thatiswhattellsuswhattodounderspecific,variableconditions.Thisisaifthishappens, thenIdothisimperative.Therearemanydifferenttypesofhypotheticalimperatives.There aretechnical,social,legal,andsoon.Technicalhypotheticalimperativesarethosethat applytochemistorsurgeons.Socialonesarethoseweusetofurtheroursocialstandingin someway.Legalwouldapplytoinstanceswherewearemakingdecisionsthatarelaws,to follow,bend,orbreak. WhenitcomestothemoralphilosophyofImmanuelKantIcanseewhereandhow hecametoconclusions.Whatmademedecidetodofurtherresearchintothetopicwas hiscategoricalimperativeandpracticalimperative.Ifeltthatthesewereverytrueand continuetobetrue.Theimportanceoftreatingandactingthewayyouwantpeopletotreat youandactisavaluablelesson,thataspreviouslymentioned,Irememberveryvividly learningasachild.Youcanseeinsomehumaninteractionthattherearepeoplewhohave differingopinionwhenitcometothis.Theydonotunderstandthelogicalreasonofwhythis makessenseormaybetheywerenevertaughtthis.Toaddsomeofmyownphilosophical
viewsIwillexpandthisatinybittoincludethefactthatweshouldnotexpectsomething fromsomeonethatwewouldnotbewillingtodoforthemorevensomeoneelse.Theidea thatsomepeoplefeelliketheyareowedsomethingthattheyhavenotearnedhasalways confusedme. Tobemoralisalwaysaverydifferentsetofrules.Therearereligionsthattellyou whatyourmoralsshouldbeandhowtobehave.TherearesocialinfluencesandIbelieve therearemoralswearebornwith.Thisisourgutfeelingaboutwhetherornotsomethingis rightorwrong,goodorbad.Therearebasicmoralsthatseemtolastthetestoftime,for example,donotkill.Althoughwedohavemilitarythataretrainedandinstructedtodojust thatanditmoral.Ifindsmoralstobeverysituational. ImmanuelKantsmoralphilosophyisinspirationaltome.Icontinuetobeamazedby allthephilosopherthatlivedsolongago,buttheirphilosophyseemstimeless.Although therearemanydifferentopinionsandmanyfollowdifferentphilosophiesandphilosophers, IseemyownpersonalmoralphilosophytofitverycomfortablywiththatofImmanuelKants. WorkCited
"ImmanuelKant."2014.TheBiography.comwebsite.Apr192014 http://www.biography.com/people/immanuelkant9360144. Johnson,Robert."Kant'sMoralPhilosophy."StanfordUniversity.StanfordUniversity,23Feb. 2004.Web.9Apr.2014.<http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kantmoral/>.