Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 3 Final
Lesson 3 Final
All information extracted from: The Experience of Nationhood: Modern Australia Since 1901. Chapter 3: Between the Wars: Australia In the 1920s and the 1930s, pages 107-108.
Returned Soldiers
When the war ended in 1918, over 260 000 Australian troops were overseas, and it was not until 1920 that the last Australian soldier had returned home. The government felt it had a special responsibility for the soldiers who had served in the war. Many thousands of the soldiers had no profession, trade or particular skill, and it fell to the government to provide for these men and help them back into society and the workforce. Many of the soldiers returning after the war found it very difficult t settle back into civilian life. Those who returned to their jobs often found that men who had not gone to the war had advanced and had better wages. The trade unions opposed attempts by the government to give preference to ex-soldiers because they feared it would damage the strength of the union movement. Returning soldiers found that the values they had lived by in the war- mateship, loyalty and honesty- did not apply in the world they returned to in the peace. A Department of Repatriation (now called the Department of Veterans Affairs) was set up to provide payment of pensions to men who had served in the war and to provide medical and hospital support for returned soldiers in special repatriation hospitals. The government also built thousands of war-service homes that were provided to former soldiers at reasonable rates. These homes were in new suburban estates out from the city centre, and streets in these new communities were often named after places associated with Australias role in World War I.
Source 3:
Questions: 1) What is meant by the term soldier settlement? 2) Was it hard for the returning soldiers to amalgamate into Australian society? 3) Why was the Soldier Settlement Scheme a failure? 4) What does Source 2 show? 5) What does Source 3 show? 6) Compare and contrast the messages that Source 2 and Source 3 could possibly be portraying.