Conference time at the Capitol. Read this month's District 24 News for insights into the conference process and to learn about some of this year's bills in the conference spotlight. Get updated about efforts to get an off-leash dog park in Makiki as another potential site (at the corner of Punahou Street and Wilder Avenue) has been identified. And don't forget to mark your calendars with events from the Short List, including a post-2014 legislative town hall meeting with Representative Della Au Belatti and Senator Brian T. Taniguchi on May 20th at the Parish of St. Clement.
Conference time at the Capitol. Read this month's District 24 News for insights into the conference process and to learn about some of this year's bills in the conference spotlight. Get updated about efforts to get an off-leash dog park in Makiki as another potential site (at the corner of Punahou Street and Wilder Avenue) has been identified. And don't forget to mark your calendars with events from the Short List, including a post-2014 legislative town hall meeting with Representative Della Au Belatti and Senator Brian T. Taniguchi on May 20th at the Parish of St. Clement.
Conference time at the Capitol. Read this month's District 24 News for insights into the conference process and to learn about some of this year's bills in the conference spotlight. Get updated about efforts to get an off-leash dog park in Makiki as another potential site (at the corner of Punahou Street and Wilder Avenue) has been identified. And don't forget to mark your calendars with events from the Short List, including a post-2014 legislative town hall meeting with Representative Della Au Belatti and Senator Brian T. Taniguchi on May 20th at the Parish of St. Clement.
Conference time at the Capitol. Read this month's District 24 News for insights into the conference process and to learn about some of this year's bills in the conference spotlight. Get updated about efforts to get an off-leash dog park in Makiki as another potential site (at the corner of Punahou Street and Wilder Avenue) has been identified. And don't forget to mark your calendars with events from the Short List, including a post-2014 legislative town hall meeting with Representative Della Au Belatti and Senator Brian T. Taniguchi on May 20th at the Parish of St. Clement.
On Thursday, May 1, 2014, the 2014 Legislature adjourns sine
die. Latin for without day, adjournment sine die marks the end of the 60-day legislative session mandated by the Hawaii State Constitution.
Sessionalways an energetic four months at the State Capitolwas further intensified this year when the Hawaii Council on Revenues downgraded its revenue projection for 2014. With this in mind, legislators redoubled their efforts to move legislation to address the needs of the State while main- taining a watchful eye on the State budget.
For updates on what bills made it through the legislative process, please consider joining Senator Brian Taniguchi and me for a Makiki Town Hall Meeting on Tuesday, May 20, 2014, 5:30 pm at the Parish of St. Clement.
I look forward to seeing you in the community and dont hesitate to contact my office at repbelatti@capitol.hawaii.gov or at (808) 586-9425 if you have specific questions or concerns about the legislative or budgeting process.
Sincerely,
Della Au Belatti State Representative, District 24 MAKIKI, TANTALUS, PAPAKLEA, MCCULLY, PWAA, MNOA APRIL/MAY 2014 District 24 News The Shortlist MAKIKI NEIGHBORHOOD BOARD Thursday, May 15, 2014 7:00 PM Makiki District Park, Arts & Crafs Bldg. 1527 Keeaumoku Street Be actve in your community! The Makiki Neighborhood Board is a great venue to get informaton, raise questons and ad- dress issues that involve City or State agencies. Monthly reports are given by the Board of Water Supply, Honolulu Fire Department, Honolulu Police Department and your State and City elected ofcials. MAKIKI TOWN HALL MEETING Tuesday, May 20, 2014 5:30-7:30 PM Parish of St. Clement, Parish Hall 1515 Wilder Avenue Please join Representatve Belat and Senator Brian T. Taniguchi for this post- session wrap-up. With bills already en- rolled to the Governor, this will be the perfect opportunity to discuss the fate of legislaton from the 2014 legislatve ses- sion. Also, there will be snacks! MAKIKI DOG PARK MEETING Wednesday, May 7, 2014 5:00-7:00 PM Makiki District Park, Arts & Crafs Bldg. 1527 Keeaumoku Street Get updated on eforts to establish an of-leash dog park in Makiki by Advo- cates for a Makiki Community Dog Park! Weigh in on the possibility of the dog park being at the corner of Punahou Street and Wilder Avenue. Volunteers and community supporters are needed to help make a dog park in Makiki a reality. State Capitol (April 17, 2014)Representative Belatti, Senator Roz Baker and the Easter Bunny helped collect and load baskets donated to the Institute for Human Services by legislative offices during the Womens Legislative Caucus Annual Easter Basket Drive. Over 100 baskets of donated housewares, toiletries, cleaning products, hygiene products, toys, baby supplies and other items were donated this year. 2
House & Senate seek to hammer out differences on legislation during final weeks of session Every session, the Hawaii State Legislature deals with a handful of bills that are particularly controver- sial. Concerned citizens show up by the dozen, submit hundreds of page of testimony, and do their best to persuade lawmakers at every step of the legislative process. In the last three weeks of session, these bills usually return to their originating bodies substantially amended to go through the grueling conference committee process. This session was no different. The following is a summary of three bills that received significant public attention, with an overview of the differences be- tween House and Senate versions, and how they fared at the end of session. SB3122: Relating to the Hawaii Community Development Au- thority SB3122 proposed to allow the Of- fice of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) to begin residential development in Kakaako makai, which encom- passes the area south of Ala Moana Boulevard in Kakaako. This area was transferred to OHA as part of the 2012 ceded lands settlement. The lands are valued at $200 mil- lion, but are subject to a 2006 ban on residential development in the area that was enacted in response to concerns about overdevelopment and access to nearby beaches. OHA argues that they will be una- ble to recoup the full value of the land unless residential construc- tion is allowed. Others have ex- pressed concerns about access to beaches and obstruction of views. Nearly 800 pieces of testimony were submitted on SB3122 and bill hearings extended well into the afternoons and early evenings. Some of the major changes made to the bill by the House included: Proposal of a 400-foot height limit for residential construc- tion; and Amendments to the purpose section to add language speci- fying the State's constitutional responsibility to improve the conditions of Native Hawai- ians. In committee, conferees met seven times over two days. Dramatic proposals emerged in the waning hours of conference including the proposal that development be per- mitted on a parcel of Kakaako makai that included both OHA and KSBE lands. Despite these efforts, agreement was not reached and SB3122 did not make it through conference.
SB2054: Relating to Health SB2054 proposed to mandate insurance coverage of treat- ment for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), providing access to diagnostic ser- vices and allowing for earlier detec- tion of these disorders. Earlier de- tection of ASD allows for earlier treatment and, consequently, great- ly reduced lifetime care costs and enhanced quality of life for children and their families. Most of the concerns regarding the bill centered on the potential costs to the State. An estimate from the (Contnued on page 3) In 2011, a stalemate between the House Finance and Senate Ways & Means committees made it necessary for members of the House & Senate conference committees to gather in one conference room to complete conference hearings.
3 Department of Human Services placed the figure at $135 million to serve children up to nineteen years of age. There were additional con- cerns about the potential impact that mandating coverage would have on insurance premiums gener- ally. This measure received almost 500 pieces of testimony and many fami- lies with affected children attended hearings to offer their passionate testimony. Some of the major changes made to the Senate bill as it crossed over from the House and back to the Senate included: An unspecified age of individu- als for whom coverage would be mandated from the Senates po- sition of coverage for individuals up to twenty-one years of age; A delayed implementation date for the insurance to be covered beginning January 1, 2016; and Inclusion of an actuarial analysis to be conducted by the University of Hawaii Eco- nomic Research Organization prior to implementation of the man- date to determine the costs, with a focus on determining the cost of coverage to the States Medi- caid program. The conferees for this bill met near- ly a dozen times over the course of two weeks reaching agreement on insurance coverage that included tighter language on the prescribing of autism therapies and monetary caps on annual and lifetime use of autism benefits. Despite the con- ferees best efforts, cost concerns led to passage of a bill providing for an actuarial analysis that exam- ines the potential impact of man- dated coverage. As reported from the conference committee, this bill no longer mandates ASD treat- ment coverage. HB1866: Relat- ing to the Ha- waii Community Development Authority Some bills are lucky to avoid the conference committee process when the origi- nating body for a bill agrees to the changes made to the bill by the other chamber. HB1866, relating to the Hawaii Community Devel- opment Authority (HCDA), was one such bill. HCDA was established in 1976 to redevelop Kakaako. Since that time, the HCDA's authority has expanded to cover development of Heeia and Kalaeloa. HB1866, as amended by the Senate, proposed a number of reforms, in- cluding: Setting at 418-foot height limit for buildings in the Kakaako mauka area; Adjusting HCDA board mem- bership composition; and Requiring the HCDA to consid- er requests for variances at pub- lic hearings that are separate and subsequent to the initial presentation of the proposal. More than 500 pieces of testimony were received on this measure. Be- cause the House agreed to Senates proposed changes, HB1866 Senate Draft 2 was enrolled to the Gover- nor for either his signature or veto before adjournment sine die. (Contnued from page 2) signed, a bill may be scheduled for conference hearing. During these hearings, House and Senate confer- ees deliberate differences between different versions of the same meas- ure.
Once the two chambers come to a consensus on a particular version, conference members can then vote on the final recommended version of the bill. After passing through the conference committee, the measure is sent to the entire House and Senate for final reading.
While conference can be a grueling and stressful time in the legislative session, measures that sustain the process are typically sent to the Governor for his consideration.
Conference Committees: Disagreement, Deliberation, Compromise & Agreement Conference is a phase of the legisla- tive session in which disagreements between Senate and House drafts of bills and resolutions are discussed and deliberated. When the two cham- bers amend the same bill in different ways, a final version of the measure must be agreed upon before the bill can be sent to the Governor for con- sideration.
The House and Senate use confer- ence as a time to either agree to the non-originating chamber's amend- ments, disagree to the non- originating chamber's amendments, or create a conference draft for the purpose of compromise between two different versions of the bill.
Conferees from both chambers are appointed by the Senate President and the House Speaker based on sub- ject matter. Once conferees are as-
Punahou Square Park (above), on the corner of Punahou and Wilder Streets, is the new proposed location of the off leash dog park in Makiki. Thoughts? Input? Join the Advocates at the All Ad- vocates Dog Park Meeting on Wednesday, May 7th, 5:00 pm at the Makiki District Park. 4 For the past two years, members of Advocates for a Makiki Community Dog Park have advocated for the cre- ation of an off-leash dog park in Makiki. The Advocates have worked with the neighborhood board, state and city officials, and Toni Robin- son, the former Director of the Citys Department of Parks and Recreation to take steps to achieve this goal. An off-leash dog park would benefit the neighborhood by providing a safe, clean, and enclosed venue for dog and dog owners to enjoy playing and exercising. A dog park would also enable citizens to encourage dog socialization and training within the local community, and provide a rec- reational space for dog-owners in the Makiki community. Although the process continues to be long and involved, the Advocates for a Makiki Community Dog Park have taken small steps forward. Most re- cently, in September 2013, the Advo- cates met with Department of Parks and Recreation staff members to dis- cuss potential locations for an off- leash dog park in Makiki. At this meeting, DPR suggested Punahou Square Park at the corner of Punahou Street and Wilder Avenue as a poten- tial location for the dog park, which is a change from the original pro- posed location at the Makiki District Park area. This new location offers more open space than the original proposed Makiki District Park area. The loca- tion is central, within walking dis- tance of many homes, and is already a bustling hub of activity. The Puna- hou Square Park site also offers two important components to a dog park - ample shade and a water supply. The community now needs to weigh in on this proposal. With the support of the Makiki Neighborhood Board, several elected officials, and the Department of Parks and Recreation, the prospect for an enclosed, off-leash dog park in Makiki looks promising! However, there is a critical need for ongoing community input and support to make this dog park a reality. In order to create and establish a Makiki dog park, members from the community need to become even more involved and help move this project forward. If you think a desig- nated off-leash dog park would bene- fit Makiki and you would like to help the Advocates establish a dog park in Makiki, please join us for an All- Advocates Meeting on Wednesday, May 7, 2014 at 5:00 PM at the Arts and Crafts Building at the Makiki District Park. For any questions about efforts to establish a dog park in Makiki, please call (808) 586-9425. We hope to see you all on May 7th!
Makiki residents continue to push for an off-leash dog park in a sea of build- ings.