This document provides a rubric for evaluating student video projects. It outlines criteria such as concept, script/storyboard, content/organization, quality, teamwork, and timeliness. Points are awarded on a scale from exemplary to incomplete. Criteria are defined for each point level to guide scoring student work in these key areas of their video project.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating student video projects. It outlines criteria such as concept, script/storyboard, content/organization, quality, teamwork, and timeliness. Points are awarded on a scale from exemplary to incomplete. Criteria are defined for each point level to guide scoring student work in these key areas of their video project.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating student video projects. It outlines criteria such as concept, script/storyboard, content/organization, quality, teamwork, and timeliness. Points are awarded on a scale from exemplary to incomplete. Criteria are defined for each point level to guide scoring student work in these key areas of their video project.
Task Description: Students will work together in assigned teams to create a video project that details a specific aspect of the course. The presentation should include appropriate photographs, video, music, graphs, and other visual aids. The final project should be burned to a DVD in a ull !ualit" !uickTime movie format. #$T%V%T& '(emplar" )roficient )artiall" )roficient %ncomplete )*%+TS $oncept ,-./0 points 1as a clear picture of what the" are tr"ing to achieve. #de2uate description of what the" are tr"ing to do and generall" how his3her work will contribute to the final project. ,0.,4 points 1as a fairl" clear picture of what the" are tr"ing to achieve. $an describe what the" are tr"ing to do overall but has trouble describing how his3her work will contribute to the final project. -.5 points 1as brainstormed their concept, but no clear focus has emerged. 6oals3final product not clearl" defined. 0.4 points 7ittle effort has been spent on brainstorming and refining a concept. 8nclear on the goals and how the project objectives will be met. Script3 Stor"board ,/.,- points The stor"board illustrates the video presentation structure with thumbnail sketches of each scene. +otes of proposed transition, special effects, sound and title tracks incl: te(t, color, placement, graphics, etc. +otes about proposed dialogue3 narration te(t are included. 9.,, points The stor"board includes thumbnail sketches of each video scene and includes te(t for each segment of the presentation, descriptions of background audio for each scene, and notes about proposed shots and dialogue. 4.: points The thumbnail sketches on the stor"board are not in logical se2uence and do not provide complete descriptions of the video scenes, audio background, or notes about the dialogue. 0.; points There is no evidence of a stor"board or script. $ontent3 *rgani<ation ,-./0 points The content includes a clear statement of purpose or theme and is creative, compelling and clearl" written. # rich variet" of supporting information in the video contributes to the understanding of the project=s main idea. 'vents and messages are presented in a logical order. %ncludes properl" cited sources. ,0.,4 points %nformation is presented as a connected theme with accurate, current supporting information that contributes to understanding the project=s main idea. Details are logical and persuasive information is effectivel" used. The content includes a clear point of view with a progression of ideas and supporting information. %ncludes -.5 points The content does not present a clearl" stated theme, is vague, and some of the supporting information does not seem to fit the main idea or appears as a disconnected series of scenes with no unif"ing main idea. %ncludes few citations and few facts. 0.4 points $ontent lacks a central theme, clear point of view and logical se2uence of information. >uch of the supporting information is irrelevant to the overall message. The viewer is unsure what the message is because there is little persuasive information and onl" one or two facts about the topic are articulated. %nformation is properl" cited sources. incorrect, out of date, or incomplete. +o citations included. !ualit" ,/.,- points >ovie was completed and had all re2uired elements. The video was well edited and moves smoothl" from scene to scene with proper use of transitions. #udio and other enhancements were well used. 9.,, points >ovie was completed and contained all re2uired items. 'diting was not done as well as it should have been. Some poor shots remain. >ovie is still somewhat chopp". #udio and other enhancements were utili<ed, but not for ma(imum effect. 4.: points >ovie was made, but had ver" little if an" editing. >an" poor shots remain. Video was ver" fragmented and chopp" with little to no audio reinforcement. 0.; points There was no movie, or tape was totall" unedited with no transitions or audio support of an" kind. Teamwork ,/.,- points Student met and had discussions regularl". #ll students on the team contributed to the discussion and were part of the final project. Team members showed respect with each other. 9.,, points Students met and had discussions regularl". >ost of the students on the team contributed to the discussion and were part of the final project. Team members mostl" showed respect with each other. 4.: points *nl" a couple of team meetings were held. >ost of the students on the team contributed at some level, but a majorit" of the work was done b" one or two. 0.; points >eetings were not held and3or some of the team members did not contribute at all to the project. 7ow levels of respect were evident within the team. Timeliness ,/.,- points #ll project deadlines were met. 9.,, points >ost project deadlines were met. Those that were late did not have significant impact on the finished project. 4.: points >an" project deadlines were not met, resulting in some impact on the finished project. 0.; points Deadlines were regularl" missed, having a significant impact on the final project. Final Score