Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exp02 Final
Exp02 Final
s
Time,sec
Graph-1(Conductivity vs time)
y = 0.1804x + 646.12
for 4M NaCl solution
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
,
s
Time,sec
Graph2(Conductivity vs time)
Graph3 Determination of conductivity change over time
y = 0.0331x + 80.381
for 1M solution
y = 0.1804x + 646.12
for 4M solution
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
,
s
Time,sec
Graph3(Conductivity vs time)
Sample calculation
Determination of electrical conductivity change per unit molar concntration change
Water was 500ml and 2ml 1M NaCl solution was added,then we can write
V
1
S
1
=V
2
S
2
V
1
=Volume of NaCl solution=2ml
S
2
=(V
1
S
1
/V
2
) S
1
=Concentration of NaCl solution
=1M
S
2
=(21)/502 V
2
=Volume of solution=502ml
S
2
=3.9810-3M S
2
=Concentration of solution=?
Water was 500ml and 4ml 1M NaCl solution was added,then we can write
V
1
S
1
=V
3
S
3
V
1
=Volume of NaCl solution=2ml
S
3
=(V
1
S
1
/V
3
) S
1
=Concentration of NaCl solution
=4M
S
3
=(41)/504 V
3
=Volume of solution=502ml
S
3
=7.9410-3M S
3
=Concentration of solution=?
Water was 500ml and 6ml 1M NaCl solution was added,then we can write
V
1
S
1
=V
4
S
4
V
1
=Volume of NaCl solution=2ml
S
4
=(V
1
S
1
/V
4
) S
1
=Concentration of NaCl solution
=1M
S
4
=(61)/506 V
4
=Volume of solution=502ml
S
4
=11.8610-3M S
4
=Concentration of solution=?
From conductivity meter we have measured conductivity(K).
when S
2
=3.9810
-3
M then K
2
=400.9 s
when S
3
=7.9410
-3
M then K
3
=741 s
when S
4
=11.8610
-3
M then K
4
=1075 s
Now electrical conductivity change per unit molar conductivity change(C)
C
1
=(K
3
-K
2
)/(S
3
-S
2
) =(741-400.9)/((7.94-3.98)10-3) =85883.84 (s/mol/L)
C
2
=(K
4
-K
3
)/(S
4
-S
3
) =(1075-741)/((11.86-7.94)10-3) =85204.08 (s/mol/L)
C
m
=(C
1
+C
2
)/2 =(85883.84+85204.08)/2 =85543.96 (s/mol/L)
Here
Diffusivity, D=
Wher V=Volume of water in diffusion vessel,(mol/L).
x=Length of capillaries,(cm).
d=Capillaries diameter,(cm).
N=Number of capillaries.
M=Molar concentration of NaCl solution,(mol/L).
C
M
=The electrical conductivity change per unit molar concentration
change,(s/mol/L).
D=2.7910
-4
cm
2
/s
For 4M NaCl solution
D=
D=3.8110
-4
cm
2
/s
Results and Discussions
In this experiment for different values of concentration we have obtained the following results:
For 1M NaCl solution the value of diffusivity is 2.7910
-4
cm
2
/s
For 4M NaCl solution the value of diffusivity is 3.8110
-4
cm
2
/s
Diffusion coefficient is inversely proportional to concentration and directly proportional to the
slope of conductivity vs. time graph. As we use the more concentrated solution, the slope of the
graph also increases Now here we have two plots (concentration vs time).Both the plots are
y=mx+c types state line.Their slopes are
For 1M NaCl solution the value of slope is 0.0331 (s/sec)
For 4M NaCl solution the value of slope is 0.1804 (s/sec)
Actually diffusivity needs to be constant for both case and the statelines needs to be parallel for
satisfying this condition.But in reality are not parallel and even they intersect each other at a
certain point on the graph paper.Thats why there are some ups and downs in the results we
have.Behind this result there are some following reasons which are listed below:
a) Trapped air bubbles in the capillaries which can hinder mass transfer.
b) Incomplete filling of the cell could create a trapped air pocket.
c) Overfilling of the cell, resulting in NaCl spilling out into the water when the cell is placed in
the diffusion vessel.
d) As the 4M NaCl solution was not freshly prepared, its concentration may not be precisely
equal to 4M.
e) In order to keep the external concentration of salt as low as possible, and in order to get
conductivity readings that reflect the total amount of salt in the tank, we have to keep fluids
in the tank well-mixed. To keep the fluids well-mixed a magnetic stirrer were used.The rate
of stirring should be kept low enough to prevent the fluid flow out of the capillaries.
f) Conductivity vs. time graph for 1M and 4M solutions should be parallel to each other. But
from our experiment it is seen that the lines for 1M and 4M solutions intersect each other. We
were supposed to use dematerialized water. Initial conductivity reading for 1M solution were
found higher than it should be for completely dematerialized water which means the 1M
solution we have used were contaminated. May be this contamination were responsible for
the change in the relationship graph between conductivity and time.
g) Ficks first law holds good when concentration is constant(steady state) and when it varies
with time then ficks second law appears to satisfy the condition.The second law is
But when steady state condition applies to ficks second law it becomes
ficks first law that is
where c=concentration, D=diffusivity , x=X-direction, j=diffusion flux.
These two law can describe the reason of deviation from ideal condition.
List of References
Mc Cab, Smith , Harriott Unit Operation of Chemical Engineering, Sixth edition
Cussler E.L., Diffusion-Mass transfer in fluid systems, third edition
Holman J.P., Heat Transfer, Ninth edition, McGraw-Hill
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_transfer
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_factors_affecting_the_rate_of_diffusion
http://classof1.com/homework_answers/chemical_engineering/ficks_law/