Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Silicon-Nanowire Mosfets Cmos Compatible Gate-All-Around Vertical
Silicon-Nanowire Mosfets Cmos Compatible Gate-All-Around Vertical
16
)
2
1 ln( 2
2 2
+ +
=
where,
si
and
ox
are the dielectric constants of silicon and
silicon oxide respectively; t
si
and t
ox
are the diameter of the
nanowire/pillar and thickness of the gate dielectric
respectively. The simulated results [16] show an exponential
increase of SS and DIBL with decreasing scaling parameter .
Our experimental results on the impact of nanowire diameter
on SS and DIBL are plotted in Fig 6, which qualitatively
agrees with the reported simulation [16]. The inability to do a
more quantitative analysis is partly due to the nature of device
structure in which direct inline metrology could not be
implemented and also the determination of physical
parameters of the device is challenging from TEM. Besides
accurate channel length measurement where expected typical
variation is up to 20 nm across the wafer, the geometry of the
channel can play a part as the nanowires have an overall
tapering geometry (Fig. 2). Though our gate excludes most of
the footing of the pillar, the channel width for most devices is
still non-uniform. This is equivalent to multiple channels
connected in series, which renders a single diameter device
analysis insufficient in characterizing the channel.
Shown in Fig 7 is the typical PMOS transfer characteristic
from devices with diameter ~40nm and gate length of
~120nm. The SS and DIBL are ~85mV/dec and 25mV/V
respectively, while the on-off ratio is ~10
7
. The performance
of p-MOS seems comparable to n-MOS.
IV. CONCLUSION
We presented a CMOS-compatible fabrication method for
nano-scale vertical GAA silicon nanowire transistor with
good device performance. Our method is simple and flexible
for further scaling of transistor devices. The measurement
results are found qualitatively in agreement with the
simulation based on semi-classical theory, which suggests
that further reduction of channel diameter improves the
performance. An improved fabrication technology currently
under development will allow us to quantitatively analyze the
carrier mobility, SS and DIBL with different device
parameters.
REFERENCES
[1] J. P. Colinge et al.,, Silicon-on-insulator: Gate-all-around
device, in IEDM Tech. Dig., 1990, pp. 595598.
[2] S. Monfray et al., 50 nm-gate all around (GAA)silicon on
nothing (SON)devices: a simple way to co-integration of GAA
transistors with bulk MOSFET process, in VLSI Symp. Tech.
Dig., 2002, pp. 108109.
[3] N. Singh et al, High-Performance Fully Depleted Silicon
Nanowire (Diameter 5 nm) Gate-All-Around CMOS
Devices, IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 27, No. 5, May,
2006, pp. 383-386.
[4] J. Moers, Turning the world vertical: MOSFETs with current
flow perpendicular to the wafer surface, Appl. Phys. A87, pp.
531537, 2007.
[5] H. Takato et al, High performance CMOS surrounding gate
transistor (SGT) for ultra high density LSIs, in IEDM Tech.
Dig., pp. 222 - 225, 1988.
[6] H. Sakuraba et al., New Three-Dimensional High-Density
Stacked-Surrounding Gate Transistor (S-SGT) Flash Memory
Architecture Using Self-Aligned Interconnection Fabrication
Technology without Photolithography Process for Tera-Bits and
Beyond, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 43, No. 4B, 2004, pp. 2217
2219.
[7] J. Sarkar et al., Vertical Flash Memory Cell With Nanocrystal
Floating Gate for Ultradense Integration and Good Retention,
IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 28, No. 5, May, 2007, pp.
449-451.
8] S. K. Jayanarayanan et al, A Novel 50nm Vertical MOSFET
with a Dielectric Pocket, Solid-State Electronics, Vol.
50(2006), pp. 897-900.
9] K. Endo et al., Fabrication of a Vertical-Channel Double-Gate
MetalOxideSemiconductor Field-Effect Transistor Using a
Neutral Beam Etching, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 45, No. 10,
2006, pp. L279-L281
[10] Y. Wu and P. Yang, Germanium nanowire growth via simple
vapor transport, Chem. Mater, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 605607,
2000.
319
[11] X. Duan and C. M. Lieber, General synthesis of compound
semiconductor nanowires, Adv. Mater., Vol. 12, No. 4, pp.
298302, Feb., 2000.
[12] Y. Huang and C. M. Lieber, Integrated nanoscale electronics
and optoelectronics: Exploring nanoscale science and
technology through semiconductor nanowires, Pure Appl.
Chem., Vol. 76, No. 12, pp. 20512068, Dec., 2004.
[13] G. Li et al., Assembly of nanostructure using AFM based
nanomanipulation system, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot.
Autom., 2004, Vol. 1, pp. 428433.
[14] D. B. Kao, et al., Two-dimensional Thermal oxidation of
silicon I. Experiments, IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices,
Vol. 34, No. 5, May, 1987, pp. 1008-1017.
[15] D. B. Kao et al., Two-dimensional Thermal oxidation of
silicon II. Modeling stress effects in Wet oxides, IEEE
Trans. on Electron Devices, Vol. 35, No. 1, Jan., 1988, pp. 25-
37.
[16] C. P. Auth and J. D. Plummer, Scaling Theory for Cylindrical,
Fully Depleted, Surrounding-Gate Transistor, IEEE Electron
Dev. Lett., Vol. 18, No. 2, Feb., 1997, pp. 74-76.
Fig.1: Process flow for pillar and transistor formation: (a) Si pillar formed by dry etch with SiN hardmask (b) and high
temperature oxidation trim. (c) A spacer layer of HDP oxide was formed by deposition followed by wet etchback. (d)
Polysilicon gate deposition and (e) Gate patterning followed by HDP Oxide deposition; (f) Removal of top oxide and top
polysilicon to expose the drain; (g) Implantation to form source and drain junction; (h) Metal contact formation.
Fig.2: Tilted view SEM image of ~ 20 nm thick, 1 m tall vertical nanowires: (a) dense array at a pitch of 500 nm, (b)
higher magnification image of dense array shown in (a); (c) Isolated single vertical nanowire with diameter ~20nm, out of
which the transistor is made.
320
(a) (b) (c) (a) (b) (c)
Fig.3: Tilted view SEM images: (a) after gate patterning; the silicon pillar is wrapped in polysilicon gate (notice the space
between the gate and wafer substrate as a result of HDP filling to reduce parasitics); (b) the drain (tip) is exposed after
polysilicon etching; (d) . TEM image of a nearby wider pillar, showing oxide thickness ~70A.
Fig 4: I
d
-V
g
curve, the threshold voltages at V
d
= 1.2V and
V
d
= 0.05V are -0.25V and -0.23V respectively; the gate
length is ~150nm
Fig 5: I
d
-V
d
curve of the same device; each pair of curves
contains I
d
-V
d
of the same gate voltage. The upper curve is
obtained when the nanowire tip serves as the source, while
the lower curve is obtained when the nanowire tip serves as
the drain
.
Fig 6: Dependence of DIBL and Subthreshold slope (SS)
on nanowire diameter. In total, about 30 devices were
measured and the error bar is estimated by the spread of the
data. There are variations of gate lengths (up to +/- 20nm)
of devices with same channel diameters.
Fig 7: I
d
-V
g
curve of PMOS, the threshold voltages at V
d
=
1.2V and V
d
= 0.05V are 0.43V and 0.4V respectively; the
gate length is ~120nm
321