This book review summarizes and critiques the book "Large-Scale Ecosystem Restoration: Five Case Studies from the United States".
The book describes five large-scale ecosystem restoration projects in the US led by the government: Everglades, Platte River, San Francisco Bay/Sacramento River Delta, Chesapeake Bay, and Upper Mississippi River. It focuses more on the political processes and negotiations between stakeholders than on-the-ground restoration results.
The reviewer critiques that the book shows restoration projects becoming part of an "environmental-industrial complex" where corporate profits take priority over ecological goals. However, grassroots restoration can also be effective by creating activists who influence larger projects.
This book review summarizes and critiques the book "Large-Scale Ecosystem Restoration: Five Case Studies from the United States".
The book describes five large-scale ecosystem restoration projects in the US led by the government: Everglades, Platte River, San Francisco Bay/Sacramento River Delta, Chesapeake Bay, and Upper Mississippi River. It focuses more on the political processes and negotiations between stakeholders than on-the-ground restoration results.
The reviewer critiques that the book shows restoration projects becoming part of an "environmental-industrial complex" where corporate profits take priority over ecological goals. However, grassroots restoration can also be effective by creating activists who influence larger projects.
This book review summarizes and critiques the book "Large-Scale Ecosystem Restoration: Five Case Studies from the United States".
The book describes five large-scale ecosystem restoration projects in the US led by the government: Everglades, Platte River, San Francisco Bay/Sacramento River Delta, Chesapeake Bay, and Upper Mississippi River. It focuses more on the political processes and negotiations between stakeholders than on-the-ground restoration results.
The reviewer critiques that the book shows restoration projects becoming part of an "environmental-industrial complex" where corporate profits take priority over ecological goals. However, grassroots restoration can also be effective by creating activists who influence larger projects.
This book review summarizes and critiques the book "Large-Scale Ecosystem Restoration: Five Case Studies from the United States".
The book describes five large-scale ecosystem restoration projects in the US led by the government: Everglades, Platte River, San Francisco Bay/Sacramento River Delta, Chesapeake Bay, and Upper Mississippi River. It focuses more on the political processes and negotiations between stakeholders than on-the-ground restoration results.
The reviewer critiques that the book shows restoration projects becoming part of an "environmental-industrial complex" where corporate profits take priority over ecological goals. However, grassroots restoration can also be effective by creating activists who influence larger projects.
EnvironmentalIndustrial Complex Large-Scale Ecosystem Restora- tion: Five Case Studies from the United States. Doyle, M., and C. A. Drew, editors. 2008. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 344 pp. $35.00 (paperback). ISBN 978-1-59726- 026-8. Large-Scale Ecosystem Restora- tion describes five restoration projects in which the U.S. govern- ment was a driving force: Everglades, Platte River, San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Delta, Chesapeake Bay, and upper Mississippi River. The gov- ernment served primarily not only as a regulator but also as a resource manager. The projects were ex- pensive, and much of the funding was from the federal treasury. In addition, all the projects involved negotiations between governments and stakeholders and included adap- tive management based on scientific input. The edited volume is formatted so that the (primarily) political and governmental environment structure of each project is described in de- tail in one chapter, which is then followed by shorter chapters cover- ing the ecology of the restoration and the economics of the project de- sign. Nevertheless, if you are looking for descriptions of what was actually accomplished in individual projects or even the range of options avail- able, these are not major thrusts of the book. The political ebb and flow of legislation, negotiation, and the changing landscape of agency policy receives much more attention than on-the-ground restoration. Everglades The core of the problem of restora- tion of the Everglades is the in- creasing population pressure in South Florida. As people moved into Florida, drainage for agriculture and flood-control projects was es- tablished. The Comprehensive Ever- glades Restoration Plan was created by Congress as a vehicle for coop- eration among the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Department of the Interior, and the State of Florida. It was recognized that the first goal of Everglades restoration had to be get- ting the hydrology right (i.e., the cor- rect amount of water had to be de- livered to the right place at the right time), in addition to reducing phos- phorus, wastewater, and saltwater in- puts. The scope of the project is such that 226 separate restoration subpro- jects have been proposed. Some of them are completed, and some have not been started. A strategy for meeting all of the goals has been to capture fresh wa- ter now lost to the sea, store it, redi- rect it to natural systems, and con- tinue to provide water for urban and agricultural uses without causing in- creased flooding. The major benefit of this project is the restoration of the ecosystem, and because the ben- efits are ecological and cultural, they are difficult to translate into dollars. Platte River In 1994 the states of Nebraska, Col- orado, and Wyoming agreed to nego- tiate a basinwide agreement to man- age water releases through the Platte system. The conflict in the Platte was around the allocation of water for industrial, agricultural, and urban uses versus releases to maintain some semblance of the broad, disturbance- dominated, sediment-clogged, un- vegetated flood plain that had ex- isted historically. Furthermore, water users were faced with water curtail- ment and endless rounds of consul- tation with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) over the Endangered Species Act (ESA). A major problem is that overall flow is not sufficient to meet the needs of consumptive ver- sus environmental uses. Users of the water were willing to accommodate the ESA, but wanted guaranteed wa- ter. A 1997 agreement provided less water to the environmental uses than the FWS wanted, but additional habi- tat was created or improved. Eventu- ally, use will be modified by temporal shifts in water release, groundwater recharge projects, and greater depen- dence on deep wells. The leverage provided by the ESA has given envi- ronmental interests a seat at the bar- gaining table. San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Delta Water from the Sacramento River flows south into the Delta, mixes with flows from several other river systems, and thenflows into SanFran- cisco Bay. At the south end of the delta, large pumping facilities move more than 5-million acre-feet to the San Joaquin Valley and to southern California cities. CALFED is a joint federal and state program that was envisioned as a cooperative effort to manage water uses. As part of this collaboration, the Bay Delta Ac- cord was signed in 1994. Interests of the concerned parties included restoration, water reliability, water quality, and levee integrity. There is a very system-oriented approach to water in California, and participants believed reliability of water supply could be achieved through storage, conveyance, efficient water use and 777 Conservation Biology, Volume 23, No. 3, 777784 C 2009 Society for Conservation Biology DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01227.x 778 Book Reviews conservation, and water transfers. Ultimately, agency scientists fought stakeholder scientists. Northern in- terests fought southern ones. State support for CALFED has been di- luted by a new focus on manage- ment of water supply called Delta Vision. Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Bay is the nations largest and most biologically diverse estuary. It has suffered from heavy degrada- tion and loss of species numbers and productivity. The primary problem is nutrient pollution, but urban growth in the watershed has reduced much of the resilience of the system such that there is little filtering by forests and wetlands. In 1978 the Chesa- peake Bay Commission was formed by Maryland and Virginia. Pennsyl- vania was added in 1985. In 1983 and 1987, further agreements iden- tified causes of bay eutrophication and stated that controllable inputs should be reduced. The Chesapeake 2000 agreement set up quantifiable goals in water quality, living resource protection, habitat protection and restoration, sound land use, and stew- ardship. To date, goals of the 1987 and 2000 agreements have not been met because of a lack of specific reg- ulatory mechanisms. Upper Mississippi River The Upper Mississippi Navigation Study was initiated to analyze im- provements in navigation for com- merce on the part of the river north of Cairo, Illinois. A National Research Council (NRC) study of the environ- mental implications of the study in 2000 resulted in a recasting of the project to include consideration of environmental as well as navigational needs. In fact, the project was to consider navigation, habitat, wildlife refuges, water supply, the river as a recreational resource, and the cul- tural history of the various reaches. The Upper Mississippi River Conser- vation Committee, made up of fed- eral and state natural resource man- agers in the basin, identified the five most detrimental river modifica- tions: levee construction; 36 locks and dams, which create slack-water pools; channelization; human settle- ment of flood plains, which increases nutrient and sediment influx; and connection of Lake Michigan to the Illinois River, which create a path for invasive species. Estimates of restora- tion potential suggest that recon- necting the river to its flood plain would result in a substantial diminu- tion of the nutrient pollution in the river. Large-Scale Ecosystem Restora- tion is, in a limited way, about ecosystem restoration. It is also, in a limited way, about science. The book is, to a much larger extent, about the way federal agencies work and to what they will pay atten- tion. Having worked for state, lo- cal, or federal agencies, some of us ran away to academia, not to sit in an ivory tower but to actually en- gage in restoration at the point of a shovel. Ultimately, restoration in America tends to be either large scale and hugely funded or small, grass- roots, and virtually unfunded. Both approaches have their value. Grass- roots restoration tends to create ac- tivists who then use the political process to make bigger restoration projects possible. One inescapable conclusion from these case histo- ries is that, above a certain level of funding, ecosystem restoration disappears into the environmental industrial complex and becomes just another excuse to make big corpo- rate profits. I hope theses efforts have good project managers. Kern Ewing University of Washington Botanic Gardens, CFR, Box 354115, University of Washing- ton, Seattle, WA 98195, U.S.A., email kern@u. washington.edu The Story of a Philosophical Problem Saving Creation. Nature and Faith in the Life of Holmes Rolston III. Preston, C. J. 2009. Trinity Univer- sity Press, San Antonio, TX. 251 (viii +243) pp. $25.95 (hardcover). ISBN 978-0-159534-050-4. Creativity is the core of natures value and of its theological truth. Cre- ativity is found whenever life suffers through a trial by growing into an evolutionary possibility that allows it to survive. God, for Rolston, is found in these possibilities and in lifes swimming upstream against en- tropy to explore them through strug- gle. God is a creation maker by be- ing a creation enabler and inspirer. Everything else is chance, and there is no pre-set design. These are the views Christopher Preston paints as Rolstons own, the results of Rol- stons own struggle throughout life to properly value the nature he first came to love as a child and which he has relentlessly studied his entire life. Rolstons life mirrors his views. When faced with a block early in his career, his creative, sideways adap- tation into a new possibility made him a world-renowned philosopher of environmentalism and, in particu- lar, the preservation of wild nature. In Saving Creation, Preston takes on a tough task. He tries to showhow the life and ideas of a philosopher are intertwined and turns a conven- tional biography into the story of a philosophical problem. This is diffi- cult because the demands of biogra- phy and the demands of philosophy can pull in different ways, and to set- tle them in the middle risks weaken- ing both. Biography demands an al- most detective-like thoroughness and insightfulness into the details of a persons life and its motivations. It also demands not trying to paint a rosy picture of a person, but rather an objective one, where empathy es- chews idealization. Philosophical ex- position, by contrast, demands that Conservation Biology Volume 23, No. 3, 2009 Book Reviews 779 ideas be presented intelligibly and in light of obvious criticisms, which means ideas should not simply be de- scribed but made to evolve through argument. What is admirable about Prestons attempt to join biography and philosophy is that together they can illustrate the philosophical life. Some think the philosophical life is the true object of philosophy. Prestons book is a convenient in- troduction to Rolstons thought, yet it suffers from a number of limita- tions. The book does not work be- cause it is neither good biography nor good philosophy and, perhaps more troubling still, because it seems at times to approach hagiography. My way of making the most out of these limitations is to return to the idea of the book as one portrait, out of many possible, of the philosophical life. Af- ter all, the book can be read as an example of how studying nature in person can be a way of doing phi- losophy (p. 111). Perhaps in reading the book this way, one can explore a possibility even in its failures, which is exactly what Preston claims is Rol- stons idea of grace in evolution. Holmes Rolston III is often thought of as the father of environmental ethics. His work onthe intrinsic value of wild nature shaped 30 years of environmental ethics and weighed heavily into such political debates as the proper management of Yellow- stone National Park. What is less well known is that Rolston is a devout Christian, a former Presbyterian min- ister, who long wanted to join the- ological with evolutionary explana- tion. His efforts to do so won him the Templeton Prize, the largest cash prize in the world awarded for intel- lectual work. The prize is given to people who make religious discover- ies. Rolston won it for his attempt to reconcile Christian theology with the life sciences. Saving Creation tells the story of how Rolston won the Templeton Prize in 2003 after being fired from his post as a pastor in the Valley of Virginia in 1965. Preston tells Rolstons story chronologically, within the frame of the 38 years between the failure in Rolstons life and the success he made out of it. That frame is like a window through which Preston peers backward into the childhood of Rolston, following him up to his early work as a pastor and far ahead to where he is now, retired and active as ever. Because, for Rolston, lifes value and Creations meaning are found in suffering through trials on a path toward greater complexity, his response to being fired as a young man exemplifies his philosophy. Rolstons grew up in the rural Shenandoah Valley, the son of a min- ister, and his lifes passion came from his early childhood love of exploring wild nature. Rolston studied physics and biology at Davidson College but decided to follow in his fathers foot- steps and enter seminary. After sem- inary, he took up a post in the Val- ley of Virginia in the early 1960s. At this eventful point in Rolstons life, he was diverted by a concep- tual and philosophical problem. His parishioners were suspicious of a pastor who spoke in the terms of then-contemporary biology and who spent so much of his time alone studying wild nature meticulously. Rolston was absent, too, soaking up every course he could take on ecol- ogy or evolutionary biology at nearby universities. At the same time, he challenged the ethic that motivated the strug- gling economy of his flock. In the 1960s, the Valley of Virginia was be- set with industrial agriculture, min- ing, and logging. Rolstons gut appre- ciation of the land and knowledge of ecology put him in opposition to the form these practices took at the time. Rolston was fired. Whether his ideas or his absence alienated his parishoners, Rolston understood that he was fired because Christian con- cepts did not cohere with biological ones and because modern industrial- ism did not value wild nature. Not long after, Rolston discovered philosophy and became a philosophy professor. At this point in the book, Preston turns more to history of ideas and away from biography: Rolstons work in the 1970s and 1980s on natu- ral value and then his struggle to bal- ance nature preservation with his du- ties to the poor in the 1990s. Preston ends his book by coming full circle to a section on theology that revisits Rolstons being awarded the Temple- ton Prize. Saving Creation does not work as a biography. There are too few sources cited and too many angles unexplored. As a result, I didnt come to know the man. For example, Pre- ston passes over Rolston and his wife adopting children rather than having their own. Given what Pre- ston has said of Rolston up to that point, one would expect a trial of some sort in Rolstons life. We learn repeatedly that Rolston deliberately thought in terms of his ancestors. And it is around the same time Rol- ston is adopting children that he de- cides DNA is the source of value in the natural world. Something re- mains unspoken when a faithful fol- lower of the family line claims DNA is the source of value yet adopts chil- dren. I understand why Preston did not go into this matter, but good biog- raphers do. They find the language to deal humanely with what may have made someone suffer and which may also illuminate a life. Telling the out- ward story does not lose the trail of lifes inner story because creativity lives therein. The second problem is that the book does not work as a his- tory of ideas. The books main ideas are frustratingly underargued. Rolstons first big idea was that there are intrinsic values in nature. Pre- stons recapitulation of this founda- tional idea for Rolston contains poor reasoning. Take, for instance, this argument: If we valued Earths biota instru- mentally for their ability to support us, then it was reasonable to value the simpler lives responsible for the supporting. These lives did not gain their value simply from their use by the more important species. Conservation Biology Volume 23, No. 3, 2009 780 Book Reviews The values were intrinsic to the or- ganisms themselves (p. 125). This argument is an assertion of the claim that there is intrinsic value. But readers want to knowwhy there is in- trinsic value. Moreover, what enables something we use is usually thought of as valuable in terms of our end of using what we use. The deeper issue is that Rolstons vision of value seems shoddy. Some- thing valuable in the context of ethics is desireable. That means value must be understood in terms of an agent, relative to ends. But none of this stan- dard background is discussed, and there is no explanation for how Rol- ston can talk about values without any agent in sight. The matter is not helped when Preston claims Rolston concluded that if something is valu- able, yet not merely useful, then no valuer is needed. How does that fol- low? Since Aristotle, there have been at least two kinds of value that are not explained by usefulness, and both of them depend on a valuer. A good his- tory of ideas should not claim posi- tions make sense without presenting them sensibly. Also confusing is Prestons expla- nation of how Rolston finds God in evolutionthe big idea of the book. Rolstons position hinges on the idea that life increases in complexity over time and that such complexity is in- trinsically valuable. He can see no explanation for increased complex- ity in a random universe gripped by entropy without some kind of creative space coaxing innovations that build on each other. God, for Rol- ston, is the possibility of further com- plexity and the suction toward it. But two omissions loom here. First, in Full House, Gould (1997, Three Rivers Press, New York) took on E. O. Wilsons claims about complex- ity and lifes apparent drive toward it. Rolston draws heavily on Wilson, and Goulds proposal seems an im- portant contrast to Rolstons vision. Gould held that complexity develops as a result of morphic limitations that give only specific directions evolu- tion can move within a genetic line. Once a creature is a vertebrate, do- ing without a backbone will not do. You have to develop on the back- bone. But complexity is not biolog- ical triumph. In terms of fecundity and adaptability, the simplest organ- isms happen to be the most biologi- cally successful. This contrast is main- stream and not hard to find in the literature. Second, if Rolston is not simply re- naming a biological possibility with the name God, then an explanation must be given as to why hean avid natural scientistcould possi- bly move from the empirical method to faith. Time and again, Preston cites Rolstons realization that there are natural mysteries presently unan- swered by science as a reason that theology should be adopted. But a gut feeling is not a reason. And just because we have not learned some- thing scientifically does not mean we can not. Moreover, that there are mysteries at the limits of our understanding is in no way grounds for the abandonment of the empirical method when seeking knowledge. Kant made this point over 200 years ago. The book is weakened by prob- lems like this because Preston makes Rolston appear dogmatic. Illustrating the Philosophical Life The most interesting part of Prestons book appears if you read it sideways, not for what it intended but for what it opens up. Saving Creation can be read as a portrait of the philo- sophical life. In this, it is often in- structive, especially in the more bio- graphical parts of the first half of the book. Hearing Rolstons story, one is struck by how uncompromising he was in his search to understand and recapture the meaning of the Shenan- doah Valley he explored as a boy. His love of studying nature took him to study science at Davidson College to which he later donated the million dollars fromthe Templeton Prize. His love of studying nature led him to lose his job as a pastor. It took him to philosophy and then to the formation of a field of thought. This itinerary, in itself, is remarkable. Moreover, Rolstons trajectory can be understood only as a search for a kind of wisdom, rather than de- tached theoretical knowledge. Rol- ston wished to see the Earth val- ued properly. This zigzagging across disciplines and vocations in search of an answer that illuminates how things should be seen is a mark of strong philosophical natures, as is the sense that theoretical work comes from a passionate inner drive to re- store human priorities. Both are an- tidotes to scholastic professionalism and its view of philosophers as good students who master someone elses books. A third antidote comes in the way one does philosophy. Although Rol- ston proved to be a traditional albeit lyricalscholar in his writing, Preston manages to show how Rol- ston did philosophy in other, equally vital ways. The best example is when Rolston went out to study life in per- son. Rolston, it turns out, is much more like an ancient philosopher than one might think. He pursued almost asceticallypractices beyond verbal dialectic that enabled him to experience value properly and to keep his love of wisdom alive. This is what the ancient schools of philos- ophy taughtPlatonists, Stoics, Cyn- ics, Epicureans. They taught a way of life, not simply a way of verbiage or even a way of theory. Here is where any scientist or pro- fessional philosopher might profit: the life one lives can seek wisdom, not simply knowledge. What remains to be worked out is what it would be to accept that studying nature in person is a way to do philosophy. From the side of the discipline of philosophy, how should fieldwork, teaching, research, and tenure be in- corporated? These are questions that have been asked recently (notably by K. Anthony Appiah). And from Conservation Biology Volume 23, No. 3, 2009 Book Reviews 781 the side of the natural sciences, how should wisdom become an organiz- ing concept that knowledge serves? This question, too, has recently re- ceived significant funding (notably at the University of Chicagos multidis- ciplinary Defining Wisdom project, which draws on the arts and the sci- ences; http://wisdomresearch.org/). More personally, one might ask, Have I ever searched for anything that hard? Was my search universally and truly valuable? Jeremy Bendik-Keymer Department of Philosphy, Le Moyne College, 1419 Salt Springs Road, Syracuse, NY 13214, U.S.A., email keymerjd@lemoyne.edu Putting Passion to Work Saving the Earth as a Career: Ad- vice on Becoming a Conservation Professional. Hunter, M. L., D. B. Lindenmayer, and A. J. K. Calhoun. 2007. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA. Conservation professionals do in- deed serve as doctors for the earth, as the authors suggest, yet despite such profound responsibility, the profession lags far behind the so- phistication of human and animal medicine. That diagnosis and treat- ment for the patient (earth) is dif- ficult, sporadic, mostly untried, and often politically unfavorable is a re- flection of the complexity and scale of the endeavor. It is not surprising then that aspiring conservation pro- fessionals have no standard courses of study or certifying exams. Saving the Earth as a Career, one of the first books to provide a much-needed ref- erence for navigating the confusing mass of choices, pitfalls, and oppor- tunities goes a long way toward fill- ing this rather large void. An added bonus is that Hunter and his coau- thors manage to do so in a casual style that is easy to read, interesting, and even funny. The wisdom these three accomplished professors have gained from their own experiences and that of their students is obvious from the beginning, shines through- out, and is shared generously. I wish this book had been around when I was making my own career decisions. The quest for career satisfac- tion begins from within, and self- examination is the theme of the first chapter, Is this the right career for you? Conservation careers span a wide range from naturalist to envi- ronmental consultant, from govern- ment scientist to community orga- nizer, from water-quality specialist to conservation planner. For any of these, the overriding requirement is a passion for making a difference to the environment. It is also necessary to weather the realities of the job, such as comparatively low pay and large amounts of computer time. In this chapter, the authors successfully foster introspection and guide expec- tations (like pay scales) to a realistic level. Most of Saving the Earth as a Ca- reer covers undergraduate and grad- uate university preparation for work- ing in conservation. The advice is solid. Take relevant courses, work hard, and do well academically and socially (having a good attitude and getting along with people is impor- tant in most conservation work). Pur- sue activities outside academia and begin to think like a conservation professional who happens to be at the student stage (p. 20) rather than a student studying a conservation discipline (p. 20). The intricacies of graduate school, from deciding which type of program to pursue (masters with thesis, professional masters, PhD) and finding a good ad- visor to getting accepted into grad- uate school, are outlined with detail and insight, making the reader an in- stant insider. An example of one such tidbit of helpful advice: choosing a program without a visit to see the university and meet your advisor and future colleagues is like going on a very long, very important blind date (p. 51). The authors also give valuable in- sight into what it takes to succeed in their world once you have ar- rived. Of particular importance is re- silience, especially during the first season of collecting data. Weather, plants, animals, and human subjects do not always behave according to plan. Study sites may be bull- dozed. If you assume every data point will make or break your project, you will generate a lot of stress and you may be blind to assess- ing things that should be abandoned and new opportunities for explo- ration (p. 109). Acknowledged also is the importance of communicat- ing well (teaching assistantships are great for improving communication and public-speaking skills), publish- ing, attending professional meetings, and making contacts. The hard-knock lessons the authors have learned (and watched students learn) are truly a gift with the heartfelt intention of giv- ing future conservationists their best chance. With degree and fleshed-out re- sume in hand, it is time to see what opportunities are out there, time to revisit career goals, and to use those personal contacts to land your dream job in conservation. Academia may seem like a natural choice (and indeed the one that the authors all made), but the authors make it clear that going the academic route will virtually guarantee a sup- port role in conservation, rather than one on the front line. Those seek- ing more direct involvement may want to consider employment with a government agency, nongovern- mental organization, or consulting firm. The final advice-filled chapter, Making a Difference, is essentially an encouraging and gentle shove into the conservation world. Ways for new conservation professionals to avoid a few key pitfalls in- clude recognizing there is more to conservation than science and Conservation Biology Volume 23, No. 3, 2009 782 Book Reviews remembering that great leaders may be conveners rather than authoritar- ians. In addition, the authors wisely recommend checking in periodically with a code of ethics, including that of the Society for Conservation Biology. I put the book to the test when I gave Saving the Earth to a di- verse group of interns working on conservation projects for The Nature Conservancy around the world. One of the interns, a senior in college thinking about graduate school, said the book really helped her and pro- vided answers to many of her ques- tions. Another intern, just beginning her second year of graduate school, thought the book should be kept at hand and that each chapter should be read as one reaches the next step. She liked the tips on admis- sions, conferences, research topics, and all the other things students have no idea how to handle when [start- ing] graduate school and thought the book was clear and easy to read. Although these students belong to the audience the authors appear to target (students in the sciences head- ing into or already attending gradu- ate school), others are likely to find the book less helpful and even at times frustrating. This brings me to the one downside of the book, its exclusivity. Whereas the title of the book and the first chapter appeal to a broad audienceanyone wanting to make a difference in conserving the Earththe focus thereafter veers strongly toward academia (courses, graduate school, research, publish- ing, and conferences) and remains there for most of the book. Readers interested in, for example, the pol- itics and policy-making side of con- servation or who cannot pursue fur- ther formal education may not find as much help here as they would like. The authors admit their academic bias, but I suspect this will not as- suage the disappointment of those enticed by the title and introduction. One student explained it this way, [I]n the opening chapter it states that people make their way into con- servation from all kinds of academic and social backgrounds. The authors repeat the same statement at the end of the book, but in between those two instances there is very little to indicate that one could actually end up in conservation without going to grad[uate] school in hard science. This intern went so far as to say the book . . . could serve as a total turn- off for somebody who lacks . . . aca- demic privilege. Two remedies come to mind. The authors could (for the next edition) simply give the book a different sub- title, say Saving the Earth as a Ca- reer: a Guide to Education and Em- ployment for Conservation Science Professionals. Alternatively, the au- thors could appeal to a broader au- dience by paring down some of the graduate school research and pub- lishing details and adding new sec- tions. These could include, for exam- ple, the current trend in professional masters degrees (such as the Mas- ters of Environmental Management degree at Duke University) or how those in countries without such pro- grams might learn from on-the-job training with an international non- governmental organization (some of which will sponsor further educa- tion). Additional sections could in- clude a host of skills that conser- vation professionals in various ca- reers will likely need. For instance, information specialists and geograph- ical information system (GIS) techni- cians and analysts will need specific GIS, remote sensing, database, net- work, and, likely, statistical training. Working for a conservation organiza- tion to change national or local poli- cies will require an entirely different set of skills. It would be marvelous were this book to evolve into a com- prehensive guide for anyone prepar- ing for any type of conservation career. Saving the Earth as a Career is a valuable reference and the authors have taken a momentous step for- ward in guiding future generations to protect the planets natural as- sets. For students interested in pur- suing the science side of conserva- tion via graduate school, there is no better guide. As these students grad- uate and begin their careers, perhaps Hunter, Lindenmayer, and Calhoun will continue to tap their wisdom, expertise, and experience to cre- ate a sequel, possibly something like Success in Saving the EarthLong- Term Impact in Your Conservation Career. Ren ee B. Mullen Biology Department, Eureka College, 300 East College Avenue, Eureka, IL 61530, U.S.A., email rmullen@eureka.edu Equating Forest Conservation with Hornbill Conservation Ecology and Conservation of Asian Hornbills: Farmers of the Forest. Kinnaird, M. F., and T. G. OBrien. 2007. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 323 9 (xviii +315) pp. $45.00 (hardcover). ISBN-13:978- 0-226-43712-5. Hornbills are perhaps the most dis- tinctive birds of the Old World trop- ics. With their exaggerated casques and raucous calls, they are hard to miss for anyone visiting the tropi- cal forests of Asia and Africa. From a conservation perspective, they are also some of the most salient species. Larger avian species like the hornbill represent critically important seed dispersers of tropical forests and are emblematic of a keystone species. Despite the fundamental role horn- bills play in providing ecological ser- vices to tropical forests, there have been few efforts to fully summa- rize their importance in an ecolog- ical and conservation context. The volume by Kinnaird and OBrien de- scribes the important role hornbills Conservation Biology Volume 23, No. 3, 2009 Book Reviews 783 play in the maintenance of tropical forests. Building on their 14 years of research working for the Wildlife Conservation Society in Indonesia, the book provides a wealth of life history on Asian hornbills, much of it never before published. Yet the book is much more than a book on the biology of the hornbill. Rather, the authors use hornbills as a vehi- cle to examine the comparative life- history variation of a tropical ver- tebrate and the many challenges of rainforest conservation in Southeast Asia. The first two chapters focus on background issues such as the sys- tematics, morphology, and distribu- tion of hornbills and will likely be of greatest interest to specialists. In the third chapter is where the au- thors hit their stride, discussing the ecological context of hornbills. Sub- sequent chapters focus on their feed- ing ecology, reproductive biology, social systems, ecological services, and, finally, threats and outlook. The book contains many analyses that will be of interest to conservation biologists. In chapter 7, for exam- ple, the authors examine the ecologi- cal services hornbills provide. Rather than just documenting hornbills as important seed dispersers, they use detailed data they collected on the Red-knobbed (Aceros cassidix) and Sulawesi Tartic Hornbills (Penlopi- des exarhatus) to model the impact of hornbills on forest dynamics. To do this, they used an integrative ap- proach, imputing data on hornbill seed-dispersal rates, population size, and detailed data on tropical tree fe- cundity and mortality, seed produc- tion, and dispersal and germination rates. The results provide an estimate of the numbers of hornbills needed to fully provide the dispersal ser- vices needed to maintain a healthy intact forest. The approach, although containing some unrealistic assump- tions (the authors admit the model assumes no other dispersers) is, nev- ertheless, a breath of fresh air in the realm of conservation planning, which all too often focuses solely on species presence and absence in de- signing reserves, rather than address- ing whether key species that do oc- cur do so in sufficient numbers to sustain fundamental ecological pro- cesses. The book adroitly outlines the many threats faced by Asias horn- bills, with only 30% of their range left and many parts under siege by logging and the expansion of agro- forestry. Many of the major threats will not be new to those famil- iar with tropical forests, but Kin- naird and OBriens first-hand ex- perience and empirical findings are both refreshing and disturbing. With ever-expanding human populations across most of Asia, it is not easy to be optimistic about forest con- servation. The authors examine the multifarious causes of deforestation, lending valuable insights forged from many years of working on the front lines of rainforest conservation. Their perspective and insights are always pragmatic, never dogmatic, and will be of value to conservation biologists working in any field. The final section of the book ex- plores the future of forest conser- vation and hornbills and evaluates possible policy and management so- lutions. Despite the importance of hornbills as a keystone species, they have generated comparatively lit- tle conservation concern compared with some avian families (e.g., par- rots). The hope is this book will help inspire a greater focus on hornbill conservation and the need to equate forest conservation with hornbill conservation. Two highlights of the book are its exceptional photographs of hornbills, by the acclaimed pho- tographer Tim Laman, and the bi- otic and artistically pleasing black- and-white illustrations by Jonathan Kingdon. This is not just a book for horn- bill enthusiasts, although it will most certainly become one of the classics. Although not all portions of the book will resonate across all disciplines, it is a welcome and useful volume for all biologists interested in the eco- logical dynamics and conservation of tropical forests. Thomas B. Smith Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Califor- nia, Los Angeles, CA 90095, U.S.A., email tbsmith@ucla.edu Along the Banks RiverTime. Ecotravel on the Worlds Rivers. Hood, M. A. 2008. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY. 276 pp. $23.00 (hard- cover). ISBN978-0-7914-7389-4. Many books have been published that describe interactions of humans withtheir natural environment. How- ever, few are both poetic and scien- tific. RiverTime by Mary Hood pro- vides a loving description of rivers of our world. She takes the reader on a nature walk and provides a guided tour in the language of a talented poet and highly competent scientist. Her descriptions of trails along rivers and the wildlife inhabiting those river banks are gentle and precise. Her tour ranges from the smallest riversthe Apalachicola, Tensaw, and Klamathto the mightiestthe Amazon, Yangtze, and Nile. Hoods description of the river en- vironment is coupled with sympa- thetic portrayals of families along the Ganges, Nile, and small and large rivers in the United States. RiverTime is easy reading and highly enjoyable, with its descriptions of pathways, cities, and steel mills and personal observations on topics ranging from bamboo thickets along the banks of the Yangtze to portrait paintings of villages on the hillside of the Yangtze. The beauty of this book is the combi- nation of poetry and scientific details on, for example, birds and vegetation in the universal patterns of the river- ine environment. Conservation Biology Volume 23, No. 3, 2009 784 Book Received In addition, the authors strong environmental sensitivity comes through, but in a gentle manner, without strident proselytizing. For those who would like to experience the delight of hiking along the rivers of the world fromtheir armchair, this book can provide hours of pleasant, informative, and picturesque eco- travel on the worlds rivers. Rita R. Colwell Center for Bioinformatics and Computa- tional Biology, University of Maryland, Col- lege Park, MD 20742, U.S.A., email rcolwell@ umiacs.umd.edu Recently Received (JanuaryFebruary 2009) Conservation for a New Generation. Re- defining Natural Resources Management. Knight, R. L., and C. White, editors. 2008. Is- land Press, Washington, D.C. 336 pp. $30.00 (paperback). ISBN 978-1-59726-438-9. Forest Community Connections. Dono- ghue, E. M., and V. E. Sturtevant, editors. 2008. RFF Press, Washington, D.C. 280 pp. $80.00 (hardcover) ISBN 978-1-933115-68-9. $39.95 (paperback). ISBN 978-1-933115-67-2. The Incomplete Eco-Philosopher. Essays from the Edges of Environmental Ethics. Weston, A. 2009. State University of NewYork, Albany, NY. 209 (xiii + 196) pp. $21.95 (pa- perback). ISBN 978-0-7914-7670-3. Natural Environments of Arizona: From Deserts to Mountains. Folliott, P., and Owen K. Davis, editors. 2008. The University of Ari- zona Press, Tucson, AZ. 208 pp. $40.00 (hard- cover). ISBN 978-0-8165-2696-3. $19.95 (pa- perback). ISBN 978-0-8165-2697-0. Nature of the Rainforest. Costa Rica and Beyond. Forsyth, A. Photographs by M. Fog- den and P. Fogden. 2008. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. 200 pp. $29.95 (paperback). ISBN 978-0-8014-7475-0. Old Growth in a New World: a Pacific Northwest Icon Reexamined. 2008. Spies, T. A., and S. L. Duncan. 2008. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 360 pp. $32.00 (paperback). ISBN 978-1-59726-410-5. Potato: a History of the Propitious Escu- lent. Reader, J. 2009. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. 336 pp. $28.00 (paperback). ISBN 978-0-300-14109-2. The State of the Nations Ecosystems 2008. H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Eco- nomics, and the Environment. 2008. The Heinz Center and Island Press, Washington, D.C. 368 pp. $29.50 (paperback) ISBN 978-1- 59726-471-6. Trees and Shrubs of Minnesota. Smith, W. R. 2008. University of Minnesota Press, Min- neapolis, MN. 744 pp. $59.95 (hardcover). ISBN 978-0-8166-4065-2. Urban Herpetology. Mitchell, J. C., R. E. Jung Brown, and B. Bartholomew. 2008. Herpeto- logical Conservation Series 3. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Salt Lake City, UT. 586 pp. $75.00. ISBN 978-0-916984- 79-3. Conservation Biology Volume 23, No. 3, 2009