Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quasi-Static Undrained Expansion of A Cylindrical Cavity in Clay in The Presence of Shaft Friction and Anisotropic Initial Stresses
Quasi-Static Undrained Expansion of A Cylindrical Cavity in Clay in The Presence of Shaft Friction and Anisotropic Initial Stresses
3
)/2
in triaxial conditions (
2
=
3
). The shear modulus may be
expressed by dening the rigidity index, I
r
=G/s
u
.
The cavity is vertical, and its radius, a, expands steadily,
starting from zero. The expansion of a cavity with -
nite initial radius a
0
can be recovered from the solutions
given below, simply by tracking the stresses at radius
r =
_
a
2
0
a
2
. As stated above, the analysis concentrates on
the inuence of the following factors, not considered in the
previous solutions:
=
v
r
r
=
1
r
_
r
a
_
=
a
r
2
zz
=
v
z
z
=
z
_
z
a
_
=0
rz
=
_
v
z
r
+
v
r
z
_
=
r
_
z
a
_
z
_
r
a
_
=
a
_
z
r
_
=
a
_
w
r
_
(2)
where (v
r
=r/a; v
=0; v
z
=z/a) are the soil veloci-
ties.
The strain rates are related to the material derivatives of
the stress through the elasticplastic constitutive equations:
i j
=
e
i j
+
p
i j
=C
i j kl
d
kl
da
+
f
i j
(3)
where f =0 is the Von Mises yield condition:
f =(
rr
)
2
+(
zz
)
2
+(
zz
rr
)
2
+6
2
rz
8s
2
u
(4)
From dimensional analysis, the stresses must depend
on the radial coordinate r only through the ratio =
a/r. Hence, the material derivatives of the stresses can be
expressed in terms of the spatial radial derivative as:
d
i j
da
=
i j
r
r
a
+
i j
a
=
_
a
r
r
a
_
i j
r
(5)
The equilibrium equations are:
r
r
+
r
=0
rz
r
+
rz
r
=0
(6)
We assume that the shear stress at the inner boundary is
constant, so that the boundary conditions are:
for r =a :
rz
=
a
for r =:
r
=
=
h0
;
z
=
v0
;
rz
=0
(7)
3. Solution procedure
The stresses are decomposed into their isotropic ( p) and
deviatoric (s
i j
) parts:
i j
= p
i j
+s
i j
(8)
where
i j
is the Kronecker delta (unit tensor). In the plastic
zone, the following variables are used, generalized from
Lodes parameters:
s
rr
=
4
3
s
u
cos sin
_
+
6
_
s
=
4
3
s
u
cos sin
_
6
_
s
zz
=
4
3
s
u
cos cos
s
rz
=
2
3
s
u
sin
(9)
The equations for stresses and strains in the vertical and
horizontal directions are only partially coupled. The veloci-
ties and strain rates in any horizontal plane, (v
r
, v
,
rr
,
)
are dened from Eqs. (1) and (2). On the other hand, the
corresponding shear stress
rz
is fully dened by the second
equilibrium Eq. (6), both in the elastic and plastic zones.
This decoupling allows a stepped solution. First, the
shear stress,
rz
, is obtained from the second equilibrium
Eq. (6). Then, the system is integrated for the normal
stresses, starting from the innite boundary, and assuming
elastic behavior, until the condition f =0 is reached. This
determines the position of the elasticplastic boundary,
=
R
. Then, the stresses and strain rates are integrated in
the plastic zone, and the normal pressure at the cavity wall
is obtained.
4. Results
In the presentation of results, use is made of the follow-
ing non-dimensional parameters:
, shaft shear factor (0 1):
rz(r=a)
=
a
=
2
3
s
u
(10)
0
, initial stress ratio:
0
=
v0
h0
2 s
u
(11)
4.1. Stresses in the elastic zone
We express the stresses in the form:
rr
= G () +
h0
= G
_
() +2ln(1
2
)
_
+
h0
zz
= G
_
() +ln(1
2
)
_
+
v0
rz
=
a
(12)
where the function () can be expressed as a power
series:
() =
_
1
n
2
2n
_
=
2
+
1
4
4
+
1
9
6
+. . . (13)
Note that this solution differs very slightly from the
conventional solution in the elastic region in which small
strains are assumed.
C. Sagaseta et al. / Second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics 621
4.2. Elasticplastic boundary ( =
R
)
The position of the boundary is given by:
ln
_
1
2
R
_
=
2
1
I
r
_
1
2
0
2
R
(14)
For =0 this reduces to:
2
R
=1exp
_
1
I
r
_
1
2
0
_
(15)
4.3. Stresses in the plastic zone
Deviatoric stresses:
The deviatoric stresses may be expressed by the follow-
ing functions which should be substituted into Eq. (9):
sin =
1+sin
cos
=
1+sin
R
cos
R
_
cos +cos
a
cos
R
+cos
a
cos
R
cos
a
cos cos
a
_
3
2
Ir
1
cos a
(16)
For =0 these reduce to:
=0
1+sin
cos
=
1+sin
R
cos
R
_
1
2
R
1
2
_
3
2
Ir
(17)
and for =1:
sin =
1+sin
cos
=
1+sin
R
cos
R
exp
_
3 I
r
_
1
cos
R
1
cos
__
(17
)
Isotropic pressure:
The mean stress is expressed as:
p = p
R
4
3
s
u
_
cos sin
_
+
6
_
cos
R
sin
_
R
+
6
__
+
4
3
s
u
R
1
cos sin d
(18)
In all the expressions, the subscripts R and a mean the
values at the elasticplastic boundary ( =
R
) and at the
cavity wall ( = 1), respectively. The integral in Eq. (18)
needs to be evaluated numerically as a closed-form integra-
tion is not available.
Wall pressure:
The pressure at the cavity wall,
a
, is the value of
rr
for = 1. For the case of isotropic initial stresses (
0
=0)
this can be obtained as a closed form expression:
a
=
h0
+G (
R
) +
4
3
s
u
_
_
1
2
_
1
2
2
R
ln
R
ln
1+
1
2
1+
_
1
2
2
R
_
(19)
which, in the absence of shaft friction ( =0) reduces to:
a
=
h0
+G (
R
)
4
3
s
u
ln
R
Expanding
R
(15) and (13) into power series and taking
only their rst term, leads to:
2
R
=
2
1
I
r
=
h0
+
2
3
s
u
_
1+ln
3
2
I
r
_
(20)
which coincides with the existing solutions for small strains
in the elastic region.
4.4. Velocities and strain rates
The velocities and strain rates in the horizontal plane
(v
r
, v
,
rr
,
2
m
_
_
w
p
(plastic)
_
_
=0 if <
R
=
r=r
_
r=R
a=ar
_
a=0
p
rz
da dr if
R
(22)
p
rz
=
1
I
r
2
a
2
_
1
2
0
_
3/2
_
r
2
a
2
_
r
3
_
r
2
2
a
2
_
1
2
0
__
+8
a
2
_
1
2
0
_
1/2
sin
r
2
_
r
2
2
a
2
_
1
2
0
__
1/2
In the above expressions, r
m
(
m
= a/r
m
) is a magical
radius (in theory, r
m
, but in practice it can be taken
as some appropriate multiple of the axial length over which
622 C. Sagaseta et al. / Second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics
the cavity expansion occurs). The integration for w
p
must
be performed numerically. The limit a
r
is the value of the
cavity radius a for which the plastic zone reaches r, the
point of calculation of w
p
, dened by the condition:
a
2
r
r
2
=
2
r
=1exp
_
1
I
r
_
_
1
2
0
__
1
2
2
r
_
_
(23)
Acknowledgements
The main part of the work presented herein was per-
formed during the visit of the rst author to the University
of Oxford, partially sponsored by a BritishSpanish Joint
Research project.
References
[1] Gibson RE, Anderson WF. In situ measurement of soil
properties with the pressuremeter. Civil Eng Pub Works Rev
1978;56:615618.
[2] Randolph MF, Wroth CP. An analysis of the deformation of
vertically loaded piles. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 1978;104
(GT12):14651488.
[3] Strack OE. Analytic Solutions of Elastic Tunneling Problems.
Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft Univer-
sity Press, 2002.
[4] Yu HS, Houlsby, GT. Finite cavity expansion in dilatant
soils: loading analysis. Gotechnique 1991;41(2):173183.