Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Response To Budget Address and Throne Speech - 2009
Response To Budget Address and Throne Speech - 2009
1
Despair and Hopelessness walked among us in broad day to the
new Cayman of solvency, of full compliance with the Public
Management and Finance Law and where, seemingly, all manner
of things is now possible.
The global recession has brought its share of challenges for these
Islands and the Government alike. Caymanians and residents
have faced job losses, inflation, salary reductions and many have
4
had to dig deeper into their pockets in order to meet monthly
household expenses.”
5
have been presented by the new administration. This is so not
just because this is fair to the previous administration but because
it is the reality and because it goes to the credibility and image
which this country needs to project to the world if we are to
remain a viable and attractive place in which to conduct
international business.
“We can confirm that these accusations (that the Cayman Islands
Government was bankrupt) are incorrect. “Indeed the recent
statement made by Moody’s confirms that the Cayman Islands
remains one of the most highly rated financial services
jurisdictions in the world”.
7
We thank God, Madam Speaker, that the Leader of Government
Business made that statement which from all reports appears to
have restored some degree of calm and confidence to those who
do business in and from these Islands. But Madam Speaker, if
this entire situation had been handled properly, I dare say there
would have been no international media firestorm, no panic
stricken business sector, locally or internationally, and no need to
refute outrageous reports that the Cayman Islands Government is
bankrupt.
Madam Speaker, this need not have been the crisis that it has
become. Of this I am certain. Many governments of many
countries across this world, including other UK Overseas
Territories and Crown Dependencies, are struggling with
operational deficits. I have already quoted what the Financial
Secretary has said regarding the deficits of the United Kingdom
8
itself and the United States. The point I am seeking to make is
that in the present global environment, the fact that a country is
running an operational deficit is not shocking news. In and of
itself, in these times that is unlikely to frighten away business and
investors. But reckless statements which suggest that the
government is bankrupt quickly have everyone running for cover.
Quite frankly, given the steady diet of alarming announcements
made by the Government over the course of the past few months,
it is a wonder that there has not been a mass exodus of business
from these Islands.
9
Regardless of the view anyone takes as to how we find ourselves
in this position, whether my administration is at fault or not, most
people who have spoken to me agree that the handling of our
present financial predicament by the new government has thus far
been disastrous.
The elections then intervened and after all the rhetoric is put to
one side, the Financial Secretary has said as recently as Friday
last the operational deficit for the 2008/09 fiscal year is $81M.
Revenue during the last fiscal year fell to $487M against the
original forecast of 528M, a movement of $41M while expenditure
exceeded the forecast by $47M.
12
I raise these issues Madam Speaker to say to this House that the
Opposition registers its grave concern at the way the Government
is proposing to deal with what is without question a very difficult
set of circumstances in producing a budget which serves us and
satisfies the United Kingdom’s requirements.
13
expenditure compared to the previous fiscal year. So, despite all
the criticisms that have been heaped on the shoulders of my
Government by the new administration and others, including
some of the media, it is worth noting that in this budget it is still
very much a case of ‘business as usual’ as far as the costs of
running the civil service are concerned.
All of these issues add to the concerns we have about the viability
of the budget proposals.
14
Madam Speaker, we understand the powerful motivation of the
new administration to produce a balanced budget thereby
avoiding the necessity to seek the UK Government’s approval to
borrow funds. But we believe that attempting to do so in a single
year and in the context of the global recession is overly ambitious,
unrealistic and inflicts unnecessary pain on the Government and
the people of the country. I say unnecessary pain because it is
our understanding that the UK Government is not insisting that
the deficit be eliminated during the course of the present fiscal
year but instead would be content with a plan which saw the
deficit reduced in succeeding years and for a balanced budget to
be produced in 2 or 3 years. This, Madam Speaker, would provide
the opportunity for both the global and local economies to recover
and for business activity and consequently government revenues
to improve over this period.
I have said that we are worried about the level of pain the revenue
measures contained in the budget will inflict on the people and
businesses in this country. This, Madam Speaker, is a real
concern. There is no question but that overall effect of these
measures will be to drive up the cost of doing business and the
cost of living in Cayman. Of particular concern is the proposal to
increase import duties across the board on all presently dutiable
items. The Financial Secretary has presented this as an increase
of 2% since duties which are currently 20% will increase to 22%.
15
But Madam Speaker an increase in duties from 20% to 22% is not
a 2% increase in the cost of bringing goods into the island. It is in
fact a 10% increase in such costs.
18
Mr. Bryant replied on October 1st, and I quote:
“I infer from your letter that you propose to meet the bulk of the
cost of reducing the deficit by the sale of Government assets.
This may be part of the way forward. Your proposal to bring your
Government’s budget in to full compliance with your PMFL in the
course of this financial year is impressive. But it is a significant
departure from the borrowing requirements you presented to me
only a few days ago so I urge you to ensure the long term costs
of such action are fully weighed against the short term benefits.
As I know you well understand, my concern in this matter is to
ensure the sustainability of CIG public finances. For the most
part this is reflected in our application of Borrowing Guidelines but
I would have concerns if CIG put long term sustainability at risk
through a rapid depletion of Government assets, or through
certain types of public private partnerships and I would want to
take a close interest in any such proposals.”
Madam Speaker, if this is so, why then why does the Government
propose to dispose of the various assets outlined on page 285 of
the AP&E document which include the Government Office
Accommodation Project and the sewerage plant?
21
ambitious in that it seeks to eliminate the present deficit in one
fiscal year; that it imposes too much hurt on the business
community and the average resident of Cayman all at once and
we are very concerned about the proposed disposal of
Government assets.
22
Cayman’s revenue streams will improve as the global economy
recovers. While there are important lessons to be learned from
this experience, we must not fall into the trap of believing that
there is something fundamentally wrong with the economic model
we have used so successfully these past 50 years, which does
not rely on direct taxation as a basis for revenue. Indeed, it has in
large part been the absence of direct taxation which is
responsible in the tremendous growth and development of our
economy and our country as a whole. I do believe that we must
continue to explore as many possible ways of broadening our tax
base as we can, but we must continue to resist with every sinew
proposals which would threaten the very premise on which the
success of our economy has been built.
We must find better ways to restrict the growth in the cost of the
public service so that as revenue grows the cost of the service
does not continue to grow proportionately as has been the case in
recent years.
24
not fallen out of the Cayman economy in the way it has in so
many other countries.
25