Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Psychotherapy Bulletin Winter 2009, 44
Psychotherapy Bulletin Winter 2009, 44
Psychotherapy
U
L
O F F I C I A L P U B L I C AT I O N O F D I V I S I O N 2 9 O F T H E
A M E R I C A N P S Y C H O L O G I C A L A S S O C I AT I O N
www.divisionofpsychotherapy.org
In This Issue
L
Psychotherapy Research Science and Scholarship
The Center for the Study of Collegiate Mental Health:
A Novel Practice Research Network with National
Reach and a Pilot Study to Match
E
Feature
A Bright Future for Psychological Assessment
Early Career
T
Reflections of an Early Career Psychologist:
How I Ended up Working at a VA Medical Center and
its Unexpected Rewards
I
Ethics in Psychotherapy
The Mandatory Reporting of Suspected Child Abuse and
Neglect: Ethical Obligations, Dilemmas, and Concerns
N
Research on Psychotherapy Integration:
Throw Away the Manual
6557 E. Riverdale
Mesa, AZ 85215
CONTENTS
602-363-9211 Editors’ Column ............................................................2
e-mail: assnmgmt1@cox.net President’s Column ......................................................5
Council Report ..............................................................9
EDITOR
Jennifer A. Erickson Cornish, Feature ..........................................................................11
Ph.D., ABPP Eat Hearty at the Table that is Psychotherapy
jcornish@du.edu Division 29 Awards Ceremony and Social Hour ....14
ASSOCIATE EDITOR Psychotherapy Research, Science, and
Lavita Nadkarni, Ph.D. Scholarship ..................................................................17
The Center for the Study of Collegiate Mental
CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Health: A Novel Practice Research Network with
Diversity National Reach and a Pilot Study to Match
Erica Lee, Ph.D. and Feature ..........................................................................23
Caryn Rodgers, Ph.D. A Bright Future for Psychological Assessment
Education and Training Membership Application............................................26
Michael Murphy, Ph.D., and Early Career ................................................................27
Eugene Farber, Ph.D.
Reflections of an Early Career Psychologist:
Ethics in Psychotherapy How I Ended up Working at a VA Medical
Jeffrey E. Barnett, Psy.D., ABPP Center and its Unexpected Rewards
Practitioner Report Ethics in Psychotherapy..............................................31
Jennifer F. Kelly, Ph.D. The Mandatory Reporting of Suspected Child
Psychotherapy Research, Abuse and Neglect: Ethical Obligations,
Science, and Scholarship Dilemmas, and Concerns
Norman Abeles, Ph.D. and Susan Perspectives on Psychotherapy Integration ............35
S. Woodhouse, Ph.D. Research on Psychotherapy Integration:
Perspectives on Throw Away the Manual
Psychotherapy Integration Division 29 Bylaws Changes Ballot ..........................37
George Stricker, Ph.D.
2010 Nominations Ballot ............................................39
Public Policy and Social Justice
Washington Scene ........................................................47
Rosemary Adam-Terem, Ph.D.
Exciting Times for Those with Vision
Washington Scene Practitioner Report ......................................................52
Patrick DeLeon, Ph.D.
Practice Update — November 2009
Early Career Feature ..........................................................................55
Michael J. Constantino, Ph.D. and A Psychotherapist’s Self-Care Guide for Our
Rachel Gaillard Smook, Psy.D.
Current Economic Debacle: Some Suggestions
Student Features Student Feature ............................................................58
Sheena Demery, M.A. Discerning Group Therapy Dynamics: Five of
Editorial Assistant Irvin Yalom’s Therapeutic Factors in the Context
Crystal A. Kannankeril, M.S. of Wilfred Bion’s Group Conceptualizations
Feature ..........................................................................63
STAFF Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
Central Office Administrator and Anusara Yoga: Parallel New Horizons
Tracey Martin
Question & Concerns – 2010 Convention Hotel......70
Website Candidates For APA President ..................................74
www.divisionofpsychotherapy.org References ....................................................................77
1
#"$!%
EDITORS’ COLUMN
Jenny Cornish, Ph.D., ABPP, Editor
Lavita Nadkarni, Ph.D., Associate Editor
University of Denver Graduate School of Professional Psychology
Division 29 welcomes Carl Rodgers had submitted a paper to
Mark Hilsenroth as another journal, but decided against
the new editor (as publishing it there since the editor had
of January 2010) of insisted on a writing a type of disclaimer
Psychotherapy: Theory, statement to accompany it; this article
Research, Practice, was published in the first issue of the
Training. Of course, journal much to Gendlin’s delight.
Charles Gelso contin- Many other luminaries also published
ues as editor through- papers in the journal under Gendlin’s
out 2009, continuing tenure including Albert Ellis, Erika
to receive and act on Fromm, Victor Frankl, Timothy Leary,
submitted manu- and Hans Strupp. Gendlin’s philosophy
scripts, and working was to focus on new ideas; he recruited
with those submitted open-minded psychologists as consult-
through 2009 but not ing editors, and would often edit articles
yet brought to completion. Hilsenroth himself, cutting material that had al-
provided his vision for the journal, ready been covered in the literature.
which is published in this winter issue This philosophy resulted in a “colorful
of the Psychotherapy Bulletin. As a way of journal” that was useful to psychothera-
welcoming him, we interviewed the cur- pists from all theoretical orientations.
rent and former journal editors about Along with the journal, PIAP made
their recollections and their recommen- other inroads into the APA culture, in-
dations for the new editor. cluding establishing Division 29, and
thereby providing a professional home
The list of journal editors and their for psychotherapists. When APA finally
many historic accomplishments is im- accepted symposia related to psy-
pressive indeed. Eugene T. Gendlin was chotherapy, but didn’t publish the infor-
first editor, serving from 1964 – 1975. mation in the printed program, Len
Gendlin reports currently that he is Pearson and others put up notices ad-
“doing very well, writing a lot of philos- vertising the symposia everywhere
ophy, and actively participating in the around the convention, including the
international Focusing Network” (com- restrooms! When PIAP members
prising over 4,000 people including 800 weren’t invited to the exclusive APA
certified trainers, and accessible at parties for “important people,” they cre-
www.focusing.org). He recalls that be- ated their own. Needless to say, the sym-
fore the journal was established, other posia and parties devoted to
journals (and even the APA convention) psychotherapy were quite well at-
refused to publish most papers related tended. Thus Gendlin became friends
to psychotherapy. Together with with many psychologists, even those
Leonard Pearson and Larry Bookbinder, outside his own interest areas, such as
Gendlin established the journal by print- Ogden Linsley, a Skinnerian, and was
ing articles at the University of Wiscon- able to grow the journal accordingly.
sin Press and giving the first issue to Gendlin recommends that future editors
members of Psychologists for the Ad-
vancement of Psychotherapy (PIAP). continued on page 3
2
#"$!%
continue to focus on new ideas, con- was that the editor was king, rather than
sciously try to avoid bias, and open authors, as was true in publications in
themselves to learning, as he did when which scientific data had to be pre-
journal editor. served. Rather, his approach was to pro-
duce a journal that was actually useful
Gendlin was followed by Arthur L. Kovacs to practitioners, educators, and students
from 1976 – 1983. Kovacs recalls being re- as well as researchers. The journal’s re-
cruited to the editor position by Stanley jection rate was 75 – 80% and often more
Graham, then Division 29 President. He than 300 papers a year were turned
found being editor a “wonderful chal- down; Freedheim personally wrote to
lenge” and worked to create a structure each author, acting as an educator and
for the journal that included developing describing in detail what was needed to
a review board, finding a new publisher, strengthen manuscripts, focusing on the
redesigning the cover and artistic presen- work itself rather than on the writers.
tation, developing procedures to solicit He was “hands on” and edited papers
manuscripts, and publishing papers liberally, cutting superfluous material
grouped by themes. He credits Gene and even correcting grammar and sen-
Gendlin for his pioneering approach to tence structure. He inherited a separate
publishing articles from a broad range of gender editor to “de-masculinize” arti-
theoretical orientations, and to establish- cles, but soon learned to do it himself.
ing an excellent journal from the begin- Freedheim’s policy was to have one spe-
ning. Kovacs hopes that the journal will cial issue each year, often focusing on
continue its proud tradition of stimulat- special populations such as ethnic mi-
ing submissions from a wide variety of norities. He also had a particular interest
theoretical perspectives and avoiding be- in papers from international authors,
coming a mouthpiece for any particular and established a program in the APA
popular approaches. It is notable that International Office to recruit volunteers
after 50 years in practice, Kovacs remains to assist authors for whom English was
in full time independent clinical practice a second language. Freedheim reports
and also continues to teach part time that he was once described by an author
at the California School of Professional as “a nice guy but tough.” He believes
Psychology. an editor’s task is to be judgmental, yet
Following Kovacs’ successful tenure as they must use wisdom coupled with
editor, Donald K. Freedheim took the diplomacy and the desire to help. His
helm until 1993. He was encouraged by advice to Hilsenroth includes the recog-
Carl Zimet to apply for the position, and nition of the crucial position of an editor,
found it very rewarding. Although who can decide what work becomes a
Freedheim had already edited several permanent record in the field. The place
publications including Professional Psy- of the editor is generally to “stay in the
chology, he recalls his appreciation to Ko- kitchen rather than the living room” of
vacs for teaching him about the journal, the Division. He also recommends ac-
and for his smooth transition into the tively seeking out manuscripts, using
editor position as a result. Freedheim re- various conventions as mine fields for
ports that Kovacs has always been inde- ideas and future authors.
fatigable, and would often type long
memos on the plane to and from Wash- Wade H. Silverman was editor from
ington. During that time, everything 1994 – 2004, following his tenure as Psy-
was in hard copy; Freedheim’s graduate chotherapy Bulletin editor from 1987 –
assistant eventually introduced him to 1993. He reports that being editor of the
the computer. Freedheim’s philosophy continued on page 4
3
#"$!%
4
#"$!%
PRESIDENT’S COLUMN
Nadine J. Kaslow, Ph.D., ABPP
Emory University Department of Psychiatry and
Behavorial Sciences, Grady Health Systems
Thank You to new members, clarifying the roles and
Division 29 responsibilities of our domain represen-
It is with mixed emo- tatives, updating our bylaws signifi-
tions that I write my cantly (which will soon go to a vote of
final newsletter col- the membership), and revising our poli-
umn as President of cies and procedures. All of these
the Division of Psycho- changes have resulted in more positive
therapy. I am proud of and open communication among the
our accomplishments this year, particu- members of the governance group.
larly those related to my main presiden-
tial initiatives: diversity and Without a doubt, one of the highlights of
psychotherapy supervision. We have my year has been the opportunity to in-
two special issues that will appear in teract with members of Division 29, via
Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, email, telephone, and at the APA con-
Training that are focused on these two vention. I have learned so much from
topics. Our board was very committed these interactions and am heartened by
to seriously grappling with the theme of the commitment that my colleagues in
diversity as it plays out in board dynam- psychology have to the advancement of
ics, divisional priorities, and our mem- high quality psychotherapy – theory, re-
bership. We have made dramatic search, practice, and training. During
improvements in our website, with this past year, I was honored to have had
more exciting changes to come in this the opportunity to work collaboratively
expanded information and networking and effectively with new friends and
portal (http://www.divisionofpsycho- long time friends on the Division 29
therapy.org/). Our programming at the governance. We have a wonderful team
APA convention was outstanding and and I am particularly grateful to my
well attended and our lunch with the presidential colleagues, with whom I
Psychotherapy Masters was once again spoke every week and emailed more
a big hit for not only the students and frequently: Drs. Jeffrey Barnett (Past-
early career psychologists in attendance, President), Jeffrey Magnavita (Presi-
but also the master psychotherapists. I dent-Elect), and Libby Nutt Williams
am delighted to announce the creation (President-Elect Designate). They have
of the Charles J. Gelso Psychotherapy helped us move the division forward in
Research Grant. Annually, this grant will exciting and innovative ways. I also
provide a small sum of financial support want to acknowledge the other mem-
to a psychotherapy process and/or out- bers of our Executive Committee, who
come researcher. The naming of this devoted considerable time and energy
grant highlights our respect and admi- to ensuring that our minutes were de-
ration for the outstanding job that tailed, our budget well balanced, and
Charles Gelso has done at the helm of
our voices heard on APA Council: Drs.
the journal, as next year will be his final
Jeffrey Younggren (Secretary), Steve So-
year in this role. Finally, we have made
belman (Treasurer), Norine Johnson and
a number of changes to enhance the in-
Linda Campbell (APA Council).
frastructure of our governance, includ-
ing creating an orientation manual for continued on page 6
5
#"$!%
Of course, much of the work of our or- possible. I have truly appreciated her
ganization rests on the shoulders of our guidance, wisdom, frequent emails, gen-
domain representatives. These individ- tle reminders, and thoughtful sugges-
uals consistently and impressively tions and insights.
stepped up to the plate to represent spe-
cific areas of interest related to psy- Because of the deep sense of connection
chotherapy: Drs. Caryn Rodgers and that I experience with members of the
Erica Lee (Diversity), Drs. Rosemary divisional governance, moving out of
Adam-Terem (Public Policy and Social the role of President is bittersweet. For-
Justice Domain Representative), Jennifer tunately, I am confident in the leader-
Kelly (Professional Practice), Michael ship abilities of my successor, Dr. Jeffrey
Murphy (Education and Training), Magnavita. I wish him the best and I
Libby Nutt Williams (Membership), will do my utmost to ensure a smooth
Michael Constantino (Early Career), and transition and another successful year in
Norm Abeles (Science and Scholarship). our division.
Dr. Jean Carter’s stewardship of the
Publications Board helped to ensure that What Makes for an Effective Leader
we offer our members the highest qual- As my term as Division 29 President
ity publications possible. Sheena De- draws to a close, it offers me the oppor-
mery, our Student Development Chair, tunity to pause and reflect on the ques-
was an outstanding spokesperson for tion of what makes for effective leaders.
student concerns and helped make our I grew a tremendous amount as a leader
division more welcoming to students. through my experiences with our mem-
bers and the governance group and I
Many significant divisional activities oc- trust that these learnings will serve me
curred under the leadership of chairs of well in future leadership roles. I believe
key committees and I am incredibly that much of the knowledge, skills, and
grateful to them for their contributions: attitudes that make for a competent and
Drs. Jean Carter (Publications Board), capable psychotherapist are parallel to
Charles Gelso (Editor of Psychotherapy: those required for effective leaders. I
Theory, Research, Practice, Training), Jenny hope these insights will encourage more
Cornish (Editor of Psychotherapy Bul- of you to become involved as leaders in
letin), Chris Overtree (Editor, Internet), our division, within APA and other pro-
Jeff Hayes (Fellows), Chaundrissa Smith fessional societies, in nonpsychology or-
(Membership), Jeffrey Magnavita (Nom- ganizations, in your home institutions,
inations and Elections), Jeff Barnett (Pro- as educators and scientists/scholars,
fessional Awards), Bonnie Markham and in your roles as advocates on behalf
(Finance), Eugene Farber (Education of a better world.
and Training), Annie Judge (Continuing
Education), Nancy Murdock (Program), Leadership is an action, not a position,
Bonita Cade (Psychotherapy Practice), and a process, not a task. Effective lead-
and Susan Woodhouse (Psychotherapy ers are intelligent and creative, have a
Research). strong work ethic and a high degree of
self-discipline, demonstrate a sense of
Governance members come and go on humor and capacity to be flexible and
an APA division board, but Tracey Mar- adaptable, and manifest undaunted cu-
tin, in our Central Office, remains a riosity. They recognize that the capacity
steady and permanent force in our or- to listen well is the cornerstone of good
ganization. She is the consistent thread leadership. Visionaries, strategic plan-
that keeps us connected and moving for- ners, and committed to action, they are
ward in the most productive manner continued on page 7
6
#"$!%
individuals combine effective manage- you see it. (Warren Bennis) • If you are
ment and leadership skills with high not coaching and teaching, you are not
emotional intelligence. Institutions popu- leading. (Jack Welch) • There is no limit
lated by effective leaders value perform- to what a (wo)man can do or where(s)he
ance management. Leaders in these can go if(s)he doesn’t mind who gets the
settings espouse a well-articulated vision credit. (Robert W. Woodruff) • A leader
and goals and ensure that bidirectional is a dealer in hope. (Napoleon Bona-
feedback processes are in place. These parte) • The best way to predict the fu-
processes support feedback that is direct, ture is to invent it. Remember, of course,
specific, developmental, positive, and there is a kind of growth in the leader-
presented in an appreciative fashion. In ship domains that only comes with
addition, they encourage people to be re- being a leader—in your work setting, in
ceptive to input feedback from their col- your community, or in another context.
leagues, subordinates, and superiors. (Alan Kay) • Don’t tell people how to do
things, tell them what to do and let them
General Electric’s (GE) model of leader- surprise you with their results. (George
ship (Jack Welch) is inspiring. It is based S. Patton) • Management is doing things
on the principle that optimal results right. Leadership is doing the right
occur when integrity and quality lay the things. ( Peter F. Drucker) • We have
foundation for all aspects of the organi- always believed that building strong
zation’s functioning and when the peo- leaders is a strategic imperative. When
ple and processes in the system facilitate times are easy, leadership can be taken
the creation of high quality products. To for granted. When the world is turbu-
support optimal results, leaders must lent, you appreciate great people. (Jeff
engage in the five Es: energy, energizers, Immelt)
edge, execute, and empathy. They must
have tons of positive energy and the There are many ways that you can be a
ability to energize others. They must leader within Division 29. You can run
have edge, the courage to make tough for an office. You can join a committee.
decisions. They must be able to executeYou can contribute to our journal, bul-
and get the job accomplished. Finally, in
letin, or website. You can apply for Fel-
the GE model, good leaders must have low status. Or you can engage in a
passion, a heartfelt and authentic enthu-
dialogue with me (nkaslow@emory.edu)
siasm about life and work; a deep senseand other members of our leadership
of caring that their neighbors, employ-team about ways in which we can
ees, colleagues and friends win; and a strengthen our division, make it a more
love of learning and commitment to per-welcoming place, assure that we best
sonal growth. meet the needs of our members, have
a stronger voice within APA and for
The following are some of my favorite the public with regard to the value of
quotes. • Leadership is like beauty—it psychotherapy.
is hard to define but you know it when
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
8
#"$!%
COUNCIL REPORT
Norine G Johnson, Ph.D. and Linda Campbell, Ph.D.
Division of Psychotherapy Council Representatives
President James Bray: APA ended the fiscal year with a deficit
Council started with of 4.9 million. It was made clear that for
a report by President 2009 a large deficit also loomed and that
James Bray on the APA could not afford to continue with
Summit of the future these large deficits. A board outline of
of psychology practice. APA’s plan to decrease the deficit by re-
Dr. Bray then filled ducing expenses in salary, reducing po-
Council in on his many sitions, and reductions in other areas
activities since the last was given. This will result in an impact
time Council met. on staff as there had to be staff layovers
in order to remain fiscally stable.
Norman Anderson’s
report: Considerable discussion occurred about
President Bray’s re- the budget item for Consolidated meet-
port was followed by ings in the Fall of 2010. The discussion
APA’s CEO Norman included the value of physically meeting
Anderson who gave an excellent update and the possibilities of finding other ways
on APA’s effort on Health Care Reform. such as electronic meetings for doing the
He stressed that APA’s priority activities work of Consolidated meetings. Discus-
included integrating mental and behav- sion then ensued about how to do the
ioral health care into primary care. He work of the organization differently.
further illuminated how the APA staff
was advocating to insure access to qual- Council accepted a budget projection
ity mental and behavior health promo- of $110,526,100 for 2010.
tion, develop and maintain a diverse Dr. Anderson asked Council to continue
psychology workforce, eliminate dispar- its work on the strategic plan. Votes
ities, increase federal funding, maintain were taken on the Goals of the organiza-
parity, and include strong privacy and tion and Core Values.
security records protection.
The three Goals were:
APA’s primary push remains with inte- Maximize organizational effectiveness;
grated health care. The organization’s Expand psychology’s role in advancing
advocacy staff is looking to secure a pro-health; and Increase recognition of psy-
vision in the health care bill to promote chology as a science. The Core Values
integrated, inter-professional care in pri-
(listed alphabetically) were: Diversity;
mary care settings; capacity building; Education and life-long Leaning; Ethics
and training programs to promote inter- and integrity; Excellence; Human wel-
disciplinary and team-based models. fare; Knowledge Dissemination; Profes-
sional practice; Scholarship; Science;
In a Senate bill, a section was included
Service, Transparency.
to expand funding to train psycholo-
gists, including in geriatric care, and a Council voted to receive the report on
definition of psychologists as health Interface between Psychology and
professionals. Global warming. This report and other
A significant portion of Council’s time reports can be found on APA’s web site.
was spent on financial issues. In 2008, continued on page 10
9
#"$!%
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
10
#"$!%
FEATURE
Eat Hearty at the Table that is Psychotherapy
Mark J. Hilsenroth, Ph.D.
Derner Institute, Adelphi University
I applied for the Edi- I also fully recognize that, in order to
torship of Psychother- have the most successful buffet experi-
apy: Theory, Research, ence, it must appeal to many different
Practice, Training be- palates, without shortchanging portion
cause, put quite sim- or content. As such, I believe the Editor
ply, I really love this of Psychotherapy must have a deep re-
journal. I love it be- spect for the diversity of perspectives in
cause it offers a smor- the field. I believe my own integrative
gasbord of all the essential elements of approach to treatment and research is
psychotherapy that I find so fulfilling. consistent with such a stance. It was
And I’m not talking about some skimpy with this goal in mind that I have assem-
haute cuisine sampling menu, but a bled an editorial board of psychologists
heavy buffet with a variety of different who represent an appreciation for the
foods, where one can come away feeling complexity of perspectives concerning
satisfied. And having eaten so heartily the treatment process. I wanted to in-
for almost the past two decades I clude people who don’t feel overly
wanted the opportunity to give back competitive with different theoretical
and help set this table for others in orientations, but rather possess a sense
search of a similar meal. of curiosity as to what others can offer
to their own perspective and approach.
Ever since I was a graduate student in In addition, as most approaches to ther-
the early 1990’s, when I used to borrow apy share similar constructs of interest
my graduate advisor’s (Len Handler) but not the labels for them, it was impor-
copy of the journal to the present, Psy- tant for me to find people who are able
chotherapy is the one journal that I try to to speak different theoretical “lan-
read cover-to-cover. I have found that, guages” and thus better able to effec-
even if an article is not in one of my ex- tively communicate to a broader
plicit areas of interest, my understand- community. While I have continued
ing of psychotherapy is expanded by it. about half of the previous editorial
Although, with my other responsibili- board, I also thought it important to in-
ties, it now may take me a month or two clude a healthy complement of new
to accomplish what used to only take a voices from these varying perspectives.
few days. Psychotherapy is still the one I believe such fresh appraisal will serve
journal I make certain to read in this to invigorate the suggestions, feedback
manner. I also try to read this journal in and discussion with authors during the
its entirety because my interests, both re- publication review process.
search and clinical, are highly consistent
I think this mix of perspectives is no bet-
with the content and breadth of the jour-
ter exemplified than in the three Associ-
nal that range the full spectrum of topics
ate Editors, or perhaps Executive Chefs,
in the field of psychotherapy. This is
who will be collaborating with me to or-
why I believe I fulfill one of the most im-
ganize this dining experience. First, I am
portant criteria for a new Editor of any
thrilled that Lisa Wallner-Samstag has
journal, an absolute passion for ‘what’
that journal does. continued on page 12
11
#"$!%
Strengthening the Reporting of Observa- suggest that this section is for advanced
tional Studies in Epidemiology statistical time series analyses (although
(STROBE) statement, as well as report- such articles would be welcomed), but
ing standards for meta-analysis includ- rather for any reports on individual
ing the QUOROM statement (Quality of treatments that occur as part of an open
Reporting of Meta-analysis) and its re- effectiveness trial or RCT where the use
cent revision PRISMA (Preferred Re- of audio/videotape and collection of
porting Items for Systematic Reviews such measures are commonplace. In ad-
and Meta-analyses). In addition, given dition, I want to open an avenue for
that one of the primary aims of the jour- publication to those in full time private
nal is to provide research that has clini- practice who are interested in integrat-
cal utility for applied practice, I will be ing research measures into their clinical
inclined to expect that authors of empir- work. I believe such a series will be ex-
ical papers report effect sizes (i.e., d, g or tremely useful in efforts to bridge the
r). I would also like to see information gap between research and practice as
reported using the more straightforward well as provide important templates of
clinical significance variables for any how to integrate basic research into ap-
psychotherapy outcome research. That plied work at the individual case level.
is, clear and clinically relevant reporting
of the percent of patients in a study who Finally, one thing that has become very
demonstrated reliable change, moved clear to me since being named the In-
into a functional (i.e. normal) distribu- coming Editor of Psychotherapy is that I
tion, achieved clinically significant am not alone in my love of this journal.
change (i.e. reliable change and move- This same passion for the journal and
ment into a functional distribution) and what it does is a sentiment that has been
those who deteriorated in functioning. expressed to me by a number of mem-
Parallel in purpose to the Practice Re- bers of the division. What has come
view articles, I will be developing a se- across loud and clear to me from these
ries of “Evidence Based Case Studies” members and from the Division 29 lead-
and hope to eventually include one in ership is that the first goal of this journal
each issue. The goal of these Evidenced is to serve the interests of the member-
Based Case Studies will be to integrate ship. That is, the primary goal of my
verbatim clinical case material with term as Editor is not to focus on increas-
standardized measures of process and ing the research citation Impact Factor of
outcome evaluated at different times the journal, but rather to satisfy the var-
across treatment. That is, authors should ied interests and tastes of the Division 29
describe clinical vignettes highlighting members for real world clinically useful
key interventions and mechanisms of articles that address theory, research,
change regarding their specific ap- practice and training issues in psycho-
proach to treatment in the context of em- therapy. To this goal I am fully commit-
pirical scales. Also, I do not mean to ted and bid you all Bon Appetit!
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
13
#"$!%
14
#"$!%
ENJOYING THE
SOCIAL HOUR!
15
#"$!%
16
#"$!%
The SDS and CCAPS were made avail- as atheist, 3% as Jewish, 1% each as
able via Titanium Schedule in January of Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, and 11% pre-
2008 and participating centers gradually ferring not to identify their religion or
converted over to using the new stan- identifying some other religion.
dardized materials by September of A key characteristic of the 2009 Pilot
2008. In order to assess the data stan- Study which differentiates it from all re-
dardization effort and to explore the lated survey research in the field, is that
usefulness of the data, a pilot test of the the 28,000+ students in the dataset rep-
CSCMH infrastructure was conducted resent the entire population of students
in January, 2009 in which anonymous, seen at the 66 counseling centers – a fact
standardized data from the past semes- which dramatically enhances the gener-
ter were pooled for over 28,000 students alizability of findings when compared to
from 66 universities. This pilot test effec- a typical survey with a response rate of
tively produced the largest dataset on just 25-30%. The data drawn from such a
college students in treatment with just large, diverse, and complete population
four months of data collection. Though can be reliably generalized to other cen-
substantial, this accomplishment repre- ters. For example, institutional charac-
sents only one-quarter of the current teristics accounted for less than 5.3% of
theoretical capacity of CSCMH’s collab- the variance across the nine CCAPS sub-
orative research network and strongly scales in use at the time. The largest in-
underscores the potential of this re- stitutional impact was on the Academic
search model to quickly and accurately Distress CCAPS subscale (5.3%), the
gather vast amounts of data related to next largest was Depression (4.8%), and
mental health, psychotherapy, and re- the remaining subscales ranged between
lated issues. 1.5% and 4.2%. Even the subscale of
Substance Use, which readers might be-
The majority of students in the pilot lieve should vary significantly by insti-
study (65%) were women with 44 indi- tution, was only impacted 0.4% by
viduals identifying as transgender. In- institutional characteristics across the
ternational students comprised 4% of entire sample. Thus, counseling centers
the sample and represented 169 coun- tend to see the same types of clients and
tries. Among domestic students, 8% problems regardless of their parent
were African American, 6% were Asian institution.
American, 70% were European Ameri-
can, 6% were Latino, 3% were multi-eth- A wide variety of findings from the
nic, 5% were of some other ethnicity, and study are reviewed in the 2009 Execu-
2% did not report their ethnicity. Ap- tive Summary (http://www.sa.psu.
proximately 18% of the students were in edu/caps/pdf/2009-CSCMH-Pilot-
their 1st year of college, 19% were soph- Report.pdf) including baseline data on
omores, 22% were juniors, 23% were prevalence and severity, alcohol and de-
seniors, and 15% were graduate stu- pression, academics, suicidality, sexual
dents; class standing was not reported orientation, and much more. However,
by or applicable to 3% of students. Het- one of the topics we were most excited
erosexuals comprised 89% of the sam- to examine was psychotherapy outcome
ple, 2% were gay, 1% were lesbian, 3% data. Could such a large and naturalistic
were bisexual, 1% reported questioning dataset, gathered without the level of
their sexual orientation, and 3% opted rigor typically employed in psychother-
not to self-identify. The sample was pre- apy research, be used to detect symptom
dominantly Christian (53%), with 13% change in clients receiving psychother-
of students expressing no religious pref- apy? Psychotherapy research has leaned
erence, 10% identifying as agnostic, 5% continued on page 20
19
#"$!%
increasingly towards rigor, and away therapy outcomes were completely nat-
from relevance, as researchers carefully uralistic: clients had multiple uncon-
screen clients, standardize interventions trolled diagnoses with a broad range of
via manuals, and carefully select/train severity, were coping with scores of un-
therapists to treat clients in a consistent, controlled environmental stressors, and
replicable manner (Gelso, 1985). While therapists varied in theoretical orienta-
rigor helps to ensure our ability to detect tion, experience, and the actual treat-
change, it conversely produces less rele- ments used. Of course, there are pros
vant therapies and the results become and cons to each approach (Borkovec &
increasingly hard to generalize to “real Castonguay, 1998); however, the fact
life” clinical settings. that we were able to detect moderate
and large effect sizes from such natura-
The pilot study data happened to in- listic data, suggests that there may be a
clude multiple administrations of the great deal to learn about psychotherapy
CCAPS for more than 1500 students, outcome research and treatment effec-
representing measurements taken prior tiveness via methodologies that focus on
to and during/post-treatment, which large-scale data collection in ecologically
were used to preliminarily assess psy- valid settings with naturally presenting
chotherapy outcome. Preliminary analy- clients.
ses of these pre-post data indicated that,
with an average of approximately 6 The 2009 CSCMH Pilot Study represents
weeks between CCAPS administrations, an important “proof-of-concept” for a
student-clients exhibited a statistically promising new research methodology
significant decrease in depressive symp- that offers the opportunity to gather vast
toms, with a moderate effect size (d = amounts of data related to many aspects
.41). Additionally, students who initially of collegiate mental health including
presented with a higher level of self-re- many aspects of naturalistic psychother-
ported depressive symptoms, relative to apy practice and research. Indeed, the
the rest of the sample, exhibited an even 2009 CSCMH Pilot Study just scratches
more pronounced improvement in de- the surface of what is possible with
pressive symptoms, with a large effect large-scale practice research networks.
size (d = .87) (Boswell, 2009). To read more about CSCMH and our
early findings, please visit our website
Effect sizes reported in meta-analytic re-
at: http://www.sa.psu.edu/caps/re-
views of psychotherapy effectiveness,
search_center.shtml.
across a wide range of treatments and
diagnoses, have ranged from .22 to 1.05 A key challenge in creating and sustain-
(Lambert & Ogles, 2004). One particular ing collaboration in provider-based re-
meta-analysis conducted by Lipsey and search networks is ensuring that the
Wilson (1993) reported an average treat- network is designed not only for scientific
ment effect of .47. Importantly, larger ef- purposes but also to meet the needs of
fects sizes (e.g., larger than 1.05) have participating treatment providers
been demonstrated in some compara- (Borkovec, 2004). CSCMH currently has
tive outcome trials, which rigorously over 140 registered counseling centers
focus on optimizing internal validity by that have actively participated in
excluding clients with some co-morbid CSCMH’s development via decision-
disorders and implementing manual- making activities at two national confer-
ized treatments, thereby maximizing the ences, listserv dialogues, and an advisory
researchers’ ability to detect treatment board comprised of counseling center
effects. In contrast, the CSCMH data
used to preliminarily explore psycho- continued on page 21
20
#"$!%
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
Full Page (4.5" x 7.5") $300 per issue Deadlines for Submission
Half Page (4.5" x 3.5") $200 per issue February 1 for First Issue
Quarter Page (2.185" x 3.5") $100 per issue May 1 for Second Issue
July 1 for Third Issue
Send your camera ready advertisement,
November 1 for Fourth Issue
along with a check made payable to
Division 29, to:
All APA Divisions and Subsidiaries (Task Forces,
Division of Psychotherapy (29) Standing and Ad Hoc Committees, Liaison and
6557 E. Riverdale Representative Roles) materials will be published at
Mesa, AZ 85215 no charge as space allows.
21
#"$!%
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
22
#"$!%
FEATURE
A Bright Future for Psychological Assessment
Hale Martin, Ph.D.
University of Denver Graduate School of Professional Psychology
With the rise of man- ing. In personality assessment, the Per-
aged care over the sonality Assessment Inventory (PAI;
past 20 years, psycho- Morey, 1991) offers a psychometrically
logical assessment has sound alternative to the second version
seen hard times. From of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personal-
what some saw as an ity Inventory (MMPI-2), which was pub-
over-emphasis on as- lished in 1989 (Butcher, Dahlstrom,
sessment in the 1970s Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) as
and 1980s (e.g., testing indiscrimi- a revision of the original MMPI (Hath-
nately), the pendulum swung to ar- away & McKinley, 1943). Furthermore,
guably under-use of assessment in the newest version of the MMPI was re-
serving clients of the mental health serv- leased in 2008, the MMPI-2-RF (Tellegen
ice. This swing was accentuated by the & Ben-Porath, 2008). It is a shorter test
forces behind managed care (e.g., work- than the MMPI-2 or PAI, with substan-
ing to maximize the impact of limited tial changes in structure from the earlier
funds) (Finn & Martin, 1997). However, versions of the MMPI. Its publisher,
there are those who persevered in prac- Pearson, provides evidence of its strong
ticing assessment, believing that it of- psychometric properties. Thus, cogni-
fered responsible and effective service to tive and self-report measures have made
some clients. Much of their work was significant advances in the past 20 years.
done outside the confines of managed
care because insurance reimbursement In recent years the Comprehensive
was time-consuming to arrange and System of the Rorschach, a performance-
based measure of personality promul-
poorly compensated. In reaction to this
gated by John Exner (Exner, 2003; Exner &
difficult time for assessment, many
Erdberg, 2005; Exner & Weiner, 1995) has
training programs around the country
demonstrated validity (see Hiller et al.,
de-emphasized training in assessment.
1999) and reliability (see Acklin et al., 2000)
However, recently there have been de- and has won many converts, including
velopments in assessment that bode courts of law (see McCann, 1998). The crit-
well for its future. First, research to im- icisms of the Rorschach Inkblot Method
prove testing instruments has continued that flared in the late 1990s and early 2000s
unabated. For example, new intelligence (see Wood et al, 2003) have been ad-
tests have emerged that attempt to bet- dressed head on by those who use and re-
ter capture our growing understanding search the Rorschach (see Martin, 2003).
of the slippery construct of intelligence. Updated norms (Exner & Erdberg, 2005), a
The Differential Abilities Scale, already large international sample gathered from
in a second edition (Elliot, 2007), a re- 13 different nations (Shaffer, Erdberg, &
vised edition of the Stanford-Binet, Fifth Meyer, 2007), research addressing reliabil-
edition (Roid, 2006), and the fourth edi- ity and validity issues (Hsiao, W. C.,
tions of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale Meyer, G. M., Abraham, L. M., Mihura, J.
for Children and the Wechsler Adult In- L., & Viglione, D. J., 2009; Mihura, Meyer,
telligence Scale (Wechsler, 2003; Wech- Bombel, & Dumitrascu, 2008), new publi-
sler 2008) have added to the arsenal of cations that fine tune scoring issues
instruments to assess cognitive function- continued on page 24
23
#"$!%
(Viglione, 2002), and research exploring tion to help clients grow from the insight
solutions to the problem of variability in and experience provided by the carefully
protocol length (Dean, Viglione, Perry, & tailored assessment process. By fanning
Meyer, 2007) among many other studies the curiosity clients have about them-
have all contributed to the continuing evo- selves, clients feel invested in the oppor-
lution of a valuable assessment tool. The tunity to understand themselves in ways
extensive flow of research seems to have that have proved elusive in life, and even
somewhat quieted the major critics of this sometimes in psychotherapy. Therapeu-
assessment instrument. tic Assessment is a semi-structured as-
sessment process. It harnesses the
Finally, a plethora of new measures have insights available from traditional testing
been developed in recent years, ranging instruments but offers them back to a
from the Adult Attachment Projective client in a novel but clinically informed
(George & West, 2001) to the Trauma manner. A growing base of empirical
Symptom Inventory (Briere et al., 1995), study supports its efficacy with a variety
to the Wechsler Individual Achievement of clients with different types of prob-
Test-II (Wechsler, 2001). New measures lems. As well as being an effective inter-
promise better tools to assess attach- vention itself, Therapeutic Assessment is
ment, trauma, eating disorders, atten- particularly well suited to the role of a
tion deficit disorder, learning disabilities consultation. For difficult or puzzling
and a myriad of other problems that cases when psychotherapy is unfocused
clients sometimes face. It is clear that the or seems stuck, a Therapeutic Assess-
tools of assessment cover a broader ment consultation offers an opportunity
range and are better developed than to clarify, deepen and enhance the work.
ever before. Finn advocates a strong collaborative re-
lationship with referring professionals in
However, the most important develop-
best serving their clients.
ment in the recent history of assessment
is the rise of the collaborative or thera- One important innovation that Finn has
peutic model of assessment. This new added to the assessment process is a
approach represents a significant new step between data collection and discus-
paradigm for assessment that captures sion of results. This “assessment inter-
the phenomenological, interpersonal vention” session goes beyond the
Zeitgeist in psychology. Constance Fis- intellectual exercise of traditional assess-
cher was the first modern voice to effec- ment by creating an in vivo experience
tively advocate that assessment can be of some important aspect of the test
used to directly benefit the client. Her findings that the client and assessor can
book Individualizing Assessment (1985) work with in the relationship in the
was ground breaking and caught the eye room. Guided by insights the testing has
of Stephen Finn. It catalyzed much of provided, it can be a powerful interven-
Finn’s thinking, leading to empirical in- tion in the hands of a skilled assessor.
vestigations, integration of knowledge The assessment intervention actualizes
from other areas of psychology, and ul- the emerging insight that “left brain”
timately the articulation of what he calls understanding is not enough to unhook
Therapeutic Assessment (see Finn, 2007). clients from ways of living that do not
Therapeutic Assessment is an approach work well for them. It leverages Allan
to assessment that seeks to maximize the Schore’s (2003) revolutionary under-
substantial therapeutic impact assess- standing that communication to the
ment can have. Beginning by focusing on “right brain” is essential to reach certain
what clients want to know about them- patterns of behavior. It also parallels the
selves, the assessment fosters collabora- continued on page 25
24
#"$!%
work of Diana Fosha (2000) whose bril- tings where research suggests it is more
liant synthesis and refinement of recent effective in producing positive change
psychodynamic thinking promises enor- than other traditional treatment modal-
mous advancement of treatment. Her ities (Little & Smith, 2009).
Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Psy-
chotherapy focuses on affect in the ther- Others, like Len Handler (2006) and Car-
apy session and offers ways to access the oline Purves (2002), have recognized
right brain in facilitating change. It is anthat their work dovetails with this new
exciting time in psychology with dove- paradigm, and clinical assessment is en-
tailing developments on many fronts, hanced by new knowledge generated by
and it is fortunate that assessment is a burgeoning number of talented re-
near the forefront of innovation. searchers and clinicians. Programs at the
annual meetings of the Society for Per-
Another difference between traditional sonality Assessment, the preeminent in-
assessment and Therapeutic Assessment ternational personality assessment
is evident in the feedback session, which organization, are evidence of increasing
Finn calls the summary/discussion ses- study and focus on the collaborative/
sion to emphasize that both client and therapeutic approach to assessment.
assessor are active participants. In Ther-
apeutic Assessment this step brings full The new paradigm offered by Collabora-
circle the collaboration started at the be- tive/Therapeutic Assessment is begin-
ginning of the process by presenting ten- ning to have an impact on training. While
tative answers to the client’s own many training programs still lament the
questions. The therapeutic impact of the lack of focus and opportunity in assess-
session is enhanced in that it follows the ment, others such as the Graduate School
assessment intervention session, which of Professional Psychology at the Univer-
already has informed the right brain. sity of Denver, are experiencing an in-
Now the insights are put into words a creased interest and emphasis in
client can understand. The session is assessment, perhaps even the leading
structured to maximize the therapeutic edge of a renaissance of psychological as-
value to a client and to help the client sessment. There are now students coming
move forward in life. Finn even advo- into the mental health field who are ex-
cates writing stories for young children cited about assessment and who have a
that capture their dilemma and offer good training foundation that incorpo-
new productive avenues. rates the new paradigm while also
re-taining the wisdom and usefulness
Therapeutic Assessment has been of traditional assessment. Advanced
adapted to children, adolescents, cou- training in Therapeutic Assessment is
ples and families. Finn’s book In Our available through Finn’s Center for
Client’s Shoes (2007) is a significant con- Therapeutic Assessment in Austin, Texas
tribution to the evolution of Therapeutic (www.therapeuticassessment.com).
Assessment. Work by Finn, Deborah
Tharinger and their students at the Uni- Thus, with all these developments, the
versity of Texas at Austin (Tharinger et pendulum of assessment’s value is
al., 2007) researches and establishes the primed to swing back strongly from
application of Therapeutic Assessment where it was pushed the past 20 years.
to children and families, an intervention With an array of new reliable and valid as-
that is geared to help change the stories sessment instruments, assessment has
families hold about their children to be much to offer to offer to today’s mental
more accurate and offer hope for posi- health practitioners and their clients. Iden-
tive change. Therapeutic Assessment tification of problems and issues that can
has also been applied in inpatient set- continued on page 26
25
#"$!%
at times be exceedingly difficult to tease coming years may well be exciting times
apart Furthermore, in managed care’s for psychological assessment.
search for effective, time-limited interven-
tions surely the accumulating, impressive References available on-line at
evidence that Therapeutic Assessment of- www.divisionofpsychotherapy.org
fers will surely soon be recognized. The
O
N O F P S Y C H O THE
THE DIVISION OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
RA P Y
D I V I SI
C
A C
N PSYCHOLOGI
and students who exchange ideas in order to advance psychotherapy.
Division 29 is comprised of psychologists and students who are interested in psychotherapy. Although Division 29 is a division of the American
Psychological Association (APA), APA membership is not required for membership in the Division.
JOIN DIVISION 29 AND GET THESE BENEFITS!
FREE SUBSCRIPTIONS TO: DIVISION 29 INITIATIVES
Psychotherapy Profit from Division 29 initiatives such as the
This quarterly journal features up-to-date APA Psychotherapy Videotape Series, History
articles on psychotherapy. Contributors include of Psychotherapy book, and Psychotherapy
researchers, practitioners, and educators with Relationships that Work.
diverse approaches. NETWORKING & REFERRAL SOURCES
Psychotherapy Bulletin Connect with other psychotherapists so that you
Quarterly newsletter contains the latest news about may network, make or receive referrals, and hear
division activities, helpful articles on training, the latest important information that affects the
research, and practice. Available to members only. profession.
EARN CE CREDITS OPPORTUNITIES FOR LEADERSHIP
Journal Learning Expand your influence and contributions. Join us
You can earn Continuing Education (CE) credit in helping to shape the direction of our chosen
from the comfort of your home or office—at your field. There are many opportunities to serve on a
own pace—when it’s convenient for you. Members wide range of Division committees and task forces.
earn CE credit by reading specific articles pub-
lished in Psychotherapy and completing quizzes. DIVISION 29 LISTSERV
As a member, you have access to our Division
DIVISION 29 PROGRAMS listserv, where you can exchange information
We offer exceptional programs at the APA with other professionals.
convention featuring leaders in the field of psy-
chotherapy. Learn from the experts in personal VISIT OUR WEBSITE
settings and earn CE credits at reduced rates. www.divisionofpsychotherapy.org
EARLY CAREER
Reflections of an Early Career Psychologist:
How I Ended up Working at a VA Medical Center and
its Unexpected Rewards
Jay L. Cohen, Ph.D.
John D. Dingell V.A. Medical Center
Disclaimer: This essay port and the therapeutic alliance. I was in
does not represent the my final year of graduate training, in
views of the John D. 2005-06, while completing my clinical in-
Dingell VA Medical ternship, when I first applied for tenure-
Center or the Depart- track positions. Those who have been in
ment of Veterans this position may have had the experience
Affairs. that very little feedback is provided when
you don’t make the interview short-list.
In the Beginning The little feedback I did receive suggested
As a first semester graduate student in I needed more seasoning, a post-doc, as
clinical psychology at a Midwestern sci- well as some time to elapse so that some
entist-practitioner Ph.D. program, I took of my papers would move from “in prep”
a required research seminar co-taught to “in press.” Fortunately, in the spring of
by multiple faculty. The seminar was 2006, one of my graduate professors with
created with the intention of jump-start- an NIH-funded study offered me a post-
ing students on ideas and helping shep- doctoral research associate position. My
herd them toward developing their primary challenge would be to integrate
master’s theses. In one of the first my interest in psychotherapy research
classes, the instructors offered to share with his research program on the study of
how they had gone about the “system- pain and emotion.
atic” process of developing their thesis.
Each proceeded to tell fantastic stories I hit the ground running. In addition to
the grant-funded study on coping skills
about being in the right place at the right
for rheumatoid arthritis, we developed
time (“It was serendipitous…“; “I was at
a pilot intervention for individuals with
a dinner party with the chair…“; “I
fibromyalgia. I also oversaw a novel sin-
joined a lab and that was what they
gle session emotional disclosure inter-
were doing…“).
vention that would become masters’
With this memory in mind, I would like theses for at least two of his graduate
to share how I think I got here, and the students. Things were happening, and I
unique challenges and opportunities that was beginning to see myself as an aca-
working in a Veterans’ Affairs (VA) Med- demic professional. In the early winter, I
ical Center presents for an early career had seen a posting for a position at a rel-
psychologist. When I started my graduate atively prestigious university, but I rec-
training, my vision for what my career as ognized that I had not yet developed the
a psychologist would look like included track record I was seeking, nor was I li-
a tenure-track position in a Psychology censed to immediately provide the clin-
Department, with a small part-time pri- ical supervision often sought by clinical
vate practice. Although genuinely in- programs. However, as spring arrived,
vested in developing my clinical skills, the position remained unfilled and I
my primary focus was on building a re- submitted my materials. I was very ex-
search program in the area of social sup- continued on page 28
27
#"$!%
cited to send out what I thought was an that point had to do with substance use.
impressive package of research and Yet, in researching these LRC positions,
teaching statements, CV, and reprints. I it became apparent that it involved
received very favorable feedback this working with individuals with serious
time, including a phone call from the mental illness (SMI). Although I consid-
search committee chair. She shared that ered myself a well-rounded clinician (for
although they were looking specifically a post-doc, anyway), I had little experi-
for someone with expertise in psy- ence working with an SMI population.
chopathology research, they really liked Further, these positions were new to VA,
my application. She encouraged me to so it was difficult to find an existing Re-
consider them that fall as she anticipated covery Coordinator to get a better sense
a position posting that might be a better of what he or she was doing. What I was
match. I felt as good as one could feel able to determine in this initial foray into
when being turned down. I was getting VA job hunting was that the LRC was
closer. supposed to serve as a local consultant
to Mental Health and facility leadership,
In late spring of 2007, shortly after sens-
as each facility was expected to trans-
ing that I was moving in the right direc-
form their mental health services to one
tion, I received a note from a former
guided by a recovery-oriented philoso-
supervisor at my clinical internship. He
phy of care. It was literally a position
had been conversing with a colleague at
shrouded in mystery. The job descrip-
the VA Medical Center in Detroit, who
tion was vague, expectations were not
shared that there were openings for psy-
well-defined, responsibilities were
chologists. He encouraged me to in-
broad in scope, and there was little legit-
quire. At this point, I was pleased with
imate power. In other words, it was the
the career trajectory I had been on in the
perfect job for which I had been prepar-
previous nine months. I had felt that I
ing the last eight years of my life.
was genuinely building a career, and
that I was close to completing the moun-
I am a staff psychologist and Local Re-
tainous climb from first-year clinical stu-
covery Coordinator at the John D. Din-
dent to tenure-track professor. My plan
gell VA Medical Center in Detroit, MI.
was to complete a full second year of the
But that title alone does not at all de-
post-doc, expecting to apply for and
scribe what I do, with whom I interact,
land a tenure-track position sometime
and what skills I use as a psychologist to
during that year. The VA positions of-
enjoy success. To do so, I must first
fered a unique opportunity, but would
briefly describe the recovery movement
certainly deviate from a carefully con-
in VA.
structed and cultivated career path. On
the other hand, I always believed that
What is Recovery?
one has to take advantage of opportuni-
Space limitations will not allow me to do
ties when they present themselves. It
justice to describing the concepts of re-
was possible that these VA positions just
covery and recovery-oriented care.
might allow for the type of research and
Briefly, recovery is a broad construct
teaching opportunities and clinical chal-
with many different definitions. Recov-
lenges that would satisfy the clinical sci-
ery is a movement, but is also one’s per-
entist in me.
sonal experience. It is a movement that
The position I was being encouraged to began and continues to be driven by
apply for was called a Local Recovery grassroots organizations that advocate
Coordinator (“LRC”). My only experi- for the rights and empowerment of
ence with the term, “recovery” up until continued on page 29
28
#"$!%
those with serious mental illness. Recov- areas for the process of engaging in sys-
ery is also the personal journey of indi- tem transformation and recovery imple-
viduals living with mental illness; there mentation: (1) Facility Infrastructure
are many outstanding first-person ac- Change, (2) Training/Education, (3) Clinical
counts of recovery in memoirs, essays, Program Development, (4) Working with
and blogs by esteemed individuals such Veterans/Grass Roots Development, and (5)
as Judi Chamberlin, Pat Deegan, Dan Community Outreach.
Fisher, Fred Frese, and Elyn Saks.
I quickly realized that I would have to
In 2003, President Bush formed a New form partnerships and teams—for many
Freedom Commission on Mental reasons, but mostly, that for change to be
Health. That same year, the State of Con- sustainable, people had to believe in it.
necticut formed the first comprehensive Most people (including myself) are am-
state mental health strategic plan adopt- bivalent about change. There had to be
ing recovery. In 2005, the VHA Office of buy-in, and that would only happen if
Mental Health Services (OMHS) everyone was part of the process. The
adopted these concepts in their strategic success of the transformation efforts
plan. The publishing of the Handbook depend upon a coordinated effort of
of Uniform Mental Health Services in stakeholders, including facility leader-
VA Medical Centers and CBOC’s (Hand- ship, program coordinators, front-line
book 1160.01) in September 2008 out- providers, support staff, and our Veter-
lines expectations to transform mental ans. I cannot summarize here the work
health services to one guided by a recov- that this entailed, but suffice it to say
ery-oriented philosophy of care. that critical partnerships have been
formed between VA and Veteran con-
One of the major steps taken by VA to
sumers. Recovery is about inclusion and
ensure that medical centers would be
empowerment—and what I am most
able to engage in transforming mental
proud of is the role I have played in en-
health services was to fund the hiring of
couraging and empowering our Veter-
an LRC at each medical center through-
ans, many with substantial talents,
out the country. It was within the con-
skills, and abilities, to develop an effec-
text of this culture and systems
tive voice. I serve as a liaison to the Vet-
transformation that I was hired in Octo-
eran’s Mental Health Consumer
ber, 2007. I was new to this VA. It was
Advocacy Council, which has become a
my first “real” job. The position was
key partner with Mental Health and
new to the facility, as it was to VA med-
Medical Center leadership.
ical centers across the country. People
weren’t really sure what to do with me
In addition to local roles, there are also re-
or what to make of me. For my part, I
gional and national relationships. For ex-
was learning about recovery and recov-
ample, I worked closely with my fellow
ery-oriented care and how I was sup-
colleagues at medical centers throughout
posed to “change the system.” I was
our network (VISN 11) to establish the
getting used to working within a large,
VISN 11 Recovery Advisory Committee.
complex organization, with many stake-
This team meets biweekly via phone to
holders. This was quite different than
develop educational activities, as well as
the context and structure in which I was
planning for programmatic implementa-
able to accomplish things in graduate
tion of recovery best practices in medical
school, on post-doc, or academia in gen-
centers throughout our VISN. I chaired
eral. Pretty soon, I had formed a basic
this Committee during its first year, and
outline for transforming mental health
services. I had identified five component continued on page 30
29
#"$!%
currently serve as the VISN LRC Point of Training Committee and the Professional
Contact with the Psychosocial Rehabilita- Standards Board. I also make time to
tion Section of the VHA Office of Mental work on research projects and write (I am
Health Services (OMHS). This group has the site PI for a VA grant-funded RCT,
been very effective in advocating for studying the impact of peer support on
training and education for staff and Veter- the management of depression).
ans and for putting recovery on the
agenda of local decision-makers. In addi- What I think I have Learned
tion, linking with psychologists across the It has been an exhilarating ride, with op-
VA landscape has been a great way to en- portunities for using the full range of my
gage in personal and professional devel- professional skills and ample opportu-
opment. There are many leadership nity for developing new skills and com-
development opportunities within VA, petencies. The position continually
and there is at least one excellent organi- evolves, and I remain aware of continu-
zation (AVAPL) that encourages psychol- ally defining and redefining myself.
ogists to take active leadership roles in the
I encourage fellow members of the Early
VA community. Career Psychologist community to en-
Looking Back and Planning Ahead gage in personal development. Know
I have come to see the LRC position as a who you are and who you want to be. My
hybrid of Clinical-Community-Industrial/ philosophy is grounded in the belief that
Organizational Psychology. I have struc- the greatest moments of learning occur
when one is engaged in sharing one’s
tured my activities based on the five
knowledge with others. I did not expect,
components identified above and the
when I was preparing for a career in aca-
corresponding workgroups of our re-
demia, that the vast majority of my
cently established Recovery Implemen-
“teaching moments“ would occur with
tation Team. I oversee peer support and
Veteran consumers of mental health serv-
family education programming and
ices who are learning to become peer
have become an advocate for Veterans
counselors. Yet, I dare say I have learned
and their families and consumers of
more from them than I could possibly
mental health services. I work with an
learn in the lab—about resiliency and
incredible team of VA employees and strength, loyalty, and honor, and courage.
Veterans who have worked tirelessly to I have learned that techniques may be
transform ideas into programs. what we do, but healing moments often
A typical week for me includes meetings come from who we are.
with Veterans and Veteran advocacy Working at VA is not for everyone. It is a
groups, training and education of staff, community, and one has to enjoy being
training and informal supervision of our a part of that community and all it en-
Veteran Peer Facilitators, meetings with tails. The people we work with and the
mental health and facility leadership to people we serve and work for are like
develop and implement evidence-based family. And that presents a unique set of
and recovery-oriented programming, challenges. The opportunities for per-
training and supervision of clinical psy- sonal and professional development,
chology interns, outreach events, en however, are endless, and the rewards
gaging in individual and group psy- are great.
chotherapy, and medical center commit-
tee activity (e.g. , strategic planning and Correspondence regarding this article
customer service steering committees). I should be addressed to jay.cohen@va.gov.
serve on the Psychology Education and
30
#"$!%
ETHICS IN PSYCHOTHERAPY
The Mandatory Reporting of Suspected Child Abuse and
Neglect: Ethical Obligations, Dilemmas, and Concerns
Katherine Barteck, MA, MS, Holly Vanderwalde, B.S.,
and Jeffrey E. Barnett, PsyD., ABPP
Loyola University Maryland
Concerns about child cific requirements, and limits of each
abuse and neglect are state’s law can vary (and thus our obli-
relevant for all psy- gations vary) a careful reading of the rel-
chotherapists. These evant laws in one’s own jurisdiction is of
are significant prob- great importance. Smith (2008) provides
lems that affect many links to each state’s laws at http://
minors with whom www.smith-lawfirm.com/mandatory_
we will come in con- reporting.htm.
tact professionally. An
estimated 794,000 chil- Child abuse and neglect are of vital im-
dren were reported to portance for psychotherapists to attend
be victims of maltreat- to due to the negative impact they may
ment and an esti- have on children throughout their lives.
mated 1,760 children Childhood experiences of abuse and
died as a result of neglect are found to relate to adolescent
abuse or neglect in delinquency (Ryan & Testa, 2005), later
2007 (USDHHS, 2009). academic difficulties (Eckenrode, Laird,
With abuse and neg- & Doris, 1993), and an increased likeli-
lect being so prevalent hood of participation in risky behaviors
and potentially so such as substance abuse (Moran,
dangerous for the vic- Vuchinich, & Hall, 2004) and sexual
tims, it is important activities leading to teen pregnancy
that psychotherapists (Herrenkohl et al. 1998). Additionally,
understand their obligations in abuse abuse and neglect are associated with in-
and neglect situations. creased difficulty in school including
lower achievement and decreased
Why We Have Reporting Requirements school attendance (Gilbert et al., 2009a).
Minors are considered a vulnerable pop- These children also experience increased
ulation; individuals who rely on others risk of behavior problems and delin-
for their care and well being, and as a re- quency, depression, suicidal ideation
sult, are afforded special protections and attempts, post-traumatic stress dis-
under the law in every state that are con- order, and somatic issues and concerns
sistent with obligations set under the (Gilbert et al., 2009a).
federal Child Abuse and Prevention and
Contrary to some prevalent stereotypes,
Treatment Act (CAPTA, 2003). These
child abuse and neglect victims and per-
laws typically mandate that educators,
petrators do not fit any specific profile.
public safety officers, and licensed health
As a result, psychotherapists must be
professionals have an obligation to re-
vigilant about assessing for signs of
port all suspected abuse and neglect of
child abuse and neglect with every pop-
minors that they learn of in their profes-
sional roles. But, since the wording, spe- continued on page 32
31
#"$!%
ulation. For instance, in 2007 approxi- about yelling at one’s child out of anger
mately 32% of victims of child maltreat- “I wish you were never born?” How
ment were younger than 4 years of age, about screaming loudly at your child
24% of victims were between the ages of with your face one inch away from his
4-7, 19% were between the ages of 8-11, own?” In essence, where does one draw
and 25% were between ages 12-17 (USD- the line as to when a reportable event
HHS, 2009). In addition, boys (48.2 %) has occurred and when the event falls
were almost equally as likely as girls below the reportable threshold and it is
(51.5%) to be victimized. Of all reported just a treatment issue?
victims, 46.1% were White, 21.7% were
African-American, and 20.8% were His- First, the threshold of physical abuse can
panic. Asian children had the lowest rate be difficult to pinpoint, especially when
of victimization. Mothers acting alone parents retain the right to use corporal
were the perpetrators in 39% of child punishment. Twenty-one states “ex-
maltreatment cases, fathers acting alone pressly exclude reasonable corporal
were responsible for nearly 18% of vic- punishment from cases requiring re-
tims, and children were maltreated by port” (Mathews & Kenny, 2008, p. 59).
both parents in nearly 17% of cases. What is “reasonable” is clearly open for
interpretation. Further, corporal punish-
All licensed mental health professionals ment is a form of discipline that clini-
have an obligation to report all sus- cians should expect to encounter with
pected or reported abuse or neglect of some regularity in their practices (Giles-
minors they come in contact with in Sims, Straus, & Sugarman, 1995). It is
their professional roles (although in therefore important to differentiate dis-
some states these reporting require- cipline from abuse. According to Gilbert
ments are present even outside our pro- et al. (2009b), signs of abuse “include
fessional roles). One might therefore ask bruises away from bony prominences:
what ethical issues, dilemmas, and con- on the head, neck, face and buttocks,
cerns exist since these requirements are trunk and arms; large bruises; clusters of
dictated in law and appear to be quite bruises; and bruises that carry the im-
clear. Relevant issues include the vague- print of an implement” (p. 170). How-
ness of most laws, the inadequate train- ever, it is also a myth that physical child
ing most psychologists receive in abuse usually results in injuries that re-
assessing the presence of abuse and neg- quire medical attention (Gilbert et al.,
lect, challenges with determining just 2009b). And, although bruises are com-
what is and is not abuse and neglect, mon in abused children, they are also
and the role of each psychologist’s deci- very common in school-aged children
sion making process. who have not been abused (80%)
(Gilbert et al., 2009b). In fact, the accu-
Ethical Issues and Concerns rate detection of actual physical abuse is
One challenge in complying with this so complicated that a new pediatric spe-
obligation is that many psychotherapists cialty has emerged. In November 2009,
are not adequately trained to address the first medical board exam will be of-
this important responsibility. Although fered in a new official specialty, child
trained to report all suspected abuse and abuse pediatrics (Klass, 2009).
neglect, we are not often trained to assess
for them. For example, when is spank- Another indicator of abuse rather than
ing one’s child abuse? What if the child discipline is the presence of additional vi-
is so sore she cannot sit in her seat at olence in the home. Domestic violence
school? What if it leaves a mark? What continued on page 33
32
#"$!%
and child abuse are highly correlated and has a tumultuous relationship with
(Banks, Landsverk, & Wang, 2008). In fact, his parents does not meet the threshold
in selected states mandated professionals of reporting. However, if the child meets
must report the exposure of a child to do- the diagnosis for moderate to severe de-
mestic violence (Mathews & Kenny, pression and symptoms are directly
2008). Any type of violence in the home linked to how the parent relates to the
warrants additional investigation into child, reporting should likely occur.
other types of violence, and additional
vigilance about possible future violence Fourth, the definition of “perpetrator”
(Banks, Landsverk, & Wang, 2008). can limit the obligations of a psychother-
apist to report suspected abuse. In most
Second, the difference between neglect states the perpetrator must be a specific
and poverty is another area of confusion. person such as a “parent, caregiver, or
It is important to note that most US juris- other individual having care custody, or
dictions exclude poverty-based neglect control of the child, or a person who is
(Mathews & Kenny, 2008) as a form of responsible for the care of the child”
child maltreatment. A parent cannot be (Mathews & Kenny, 2008, p. 55). Various
held criminally responsible for not being states also include anyone living in the
able to provide for his/her children. home, any family member, teachers, or
However, if a parent-client has been pro- clergy. Some states also require report-
vided referrals and assistance in utilizing ing regardless of the relationship of the
social services and charitable organiza- perpetrator to the victim.
tions, a report may still need to be made if
the caregiver is neglecting the child by not There are other challenges psychologists
seeking assistance or using the assistance face regarding deciding if they should
as it was intended. In fact, in 2007, 59% of make a report or not based on the word-
verified child maltreatment cases were ing of relevant statutes. For example,
neglect (USDHHS, 2009). some states require reporting if the
“child’s health or welfare is harmed.”
Third, what constitutes emotional harm Others mention a “substantial risk of
is difficult to determine. Children usu- being harmed.” Just how the psycholo-
ally do not present for mental health gist is to assess these and determine the
treatment without some type of emo- threshold for reporting is not clear. How
tional difficulties. The state of Wisconsin much harm or potential for harm is
has comprehensively defined emotional enough to warrant filing a report? Many
harm as “harm to a child’s psychological laws define neglect as being when
or intellectual functioning. . . evidenced “proper care and attention” are not pro-
by one or more of the following charac-
vided to the minor. Whose definition of
teristics exhibited to a severe degree:
proper is to be followed? The definitions
anxiety; depression; withdrawal; out-
of abuse and neglect are not entirely
ward aggressive behavior; or a substan-
clear and appear subject to interpreta-
tial and observable change in behavior,
tion and subjective appraisal. The role of
emotional response or cognition that is
cultural differences further complicates
not within the normal range for the
this. Many clinicians’ judgments and de-
child’s age and stage of development”
cisions in these matters are impacted by
(as cited in Mathews & Kenny, 2008, p.
social norms, cultural beliefs, and values
59). This definition is important in that
(Lewit, 1994; Sternberg, 1993). Most
it recognizes that the effect of emotional
statutes allow the professional to use his
abuse must be present through severe
or her judgment in making these deci-
clinical symptomology. For example, a
child who suffers from mild depression continued on page 34
33
#"$!%
sions. But, basing such decisions on a consequences for all involved. Each psy-
gut feeling or some other subjective chotherapist should carefully consider
judgment or impression seems not to be their obligations in this regard.
the most appropriate method to use in
such high stakes situations. Recommendations
• Actively utilize the informed consent
Reasons for Not Reporting process to ensure that clients under-
There are a number of factors that profes- stand all limits to confidentiality that
sionals consider when deciding on mak- exist and the extent of your reporting
ing a mandated report. Egu and Weiss requirements. Ensure that informed
(2003) report that the perceived level of consent is an ongoing discussion and
severity of the suspected abuse has a sig- provide illustrative clinical examples
nificant impact on reporting decisions. As to help clients understand what is or
perceived level of severity decreases, con-is not a reportable offense.
cerns about the psychotherapeutic rela- • Utilize assessment measures and do not
tionship appear to increase and concerns rely on your subjective appraisal of
for the minor’s safety decrease. The na- symptoms of abuse or neglect such as the
ture of the suspected abuse is also a sig- Conflict Tactics Scales (Straus, 2007). Ob-
nificant factor (Brosig & Kalichman, 1992) tain needed training to assess for the
with sexual abuse being reported more presence of abuse and neglect. Under-
often than any other type of abuse stand the role of bias and stereotypes and
(Warner & Hansen, 1994). The profes- the impact of culture, religion, SES, and
sional’s level of familiarity with the re- other diversity factors. Know the system
porting process (Alvarez et al., 2005) and in your local jurisdiction. Beyond know-
comfort with it (Vullimany & Sullivan, ing the reporting statutes, know the serv-
2000) are relevant as well. Characteristicsices available and how reports are
of the family involved in the abuse also handled. Attempt to collaborate with the
impact professionals’ decisions about re- client when making a report. This can as-
porting to include socioeconomic status sist in preserving the therapeutic alliance
and racial minority status (Benbenishty & and in promoting the client’s autonomy.
Chen, 2003). Further, VanBergeijk (2007) • Utilize colleagues, the American Psy-
reports the three major factors impacting chological Association, and state
whether or not suspected abuse and neg- ethics committees for consultation
lect are reported are the professional’s when unsure of how to proceed in a
confidence level that the abuse occurred, given situation.
• Document all client contacts, suspi-
the professional’s affiliation with the in-
stitution where the abuse was reported, cions of abuse and neglect, your deci-
and the number of obstacles a psy- sion making process and deliberations,
chotherapist person needs to overcome to your assessment and factors consid-
ered, and the reporting process fully.
file a report. Each of these factors must be
considered in addition to the challenges • Work with your local professional as-
addressed earlier regarding the wording sociations to remove the ambiguity
of mandatory reporting statutes, how to present in many laws by including
actually assess for the presence of abuse more operationalized definitions of
or neglect, and how to decide if a behav- abuse and neglect in mandatory re-
porting statutes.
ior is a reportable offense. But, failure to
make mandatory reports due to personal
discomfort, biases, or subjective judg- References available on-line at
ments may have far reaching effects and www.divisionofpsychotherapy.org
34
#"$!%
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOTHERAPY
INTEGRATION
Research on Psychotherapy Integration:
Throw Away the Manual
Paul L. Wachtel, Ph.D.
City College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York
The evolution of psy- are obvious—patients deserve to receive
chotherapy integration treatments that have been shown to be
confronts at this point effective rather than being simply what
in the development of the therapist likes to practice or “feels”
the integrative move- to be effective . Moreover, not only is it
ment an intriguing and important to demonstrate the effective-
somewhat contradic- ness of therapy but, at least as impor-
tory challenge. On the one hand, there tant, to improve the effectiveness of
are many indications that large numbers psychotherapy. And to do so, we need to
of therapists identify as integrative and keep refining and extending our knowl-
eclectic and attempt to work in this fash- edge, a process in which knowledge is
ion (e.g., Norcross, Karpiak, & Santoro, gained not only by learning new things
2005; Norcross, Hedges, & Castle, 2002). but by learning what old things we
On the other hand, integrative therapies thought we knew are actually not so.
have suffered because less research has
The bad reasons underlying the call
been conducted on their effectiveness for evidence-based practice should be
than “pure form” therapies (Goldfried, equally obvious, though—as a reflection
1991). One reason that the latter is the of the very reason they are problem-
case is because the criteria for meaning-atic— they are often buried under obfus-
ful outcome research that have been in- cations and skilled public relations.
creasingly emphasized in our journals, Health and mental health care in this
in our graduate schools, and in our country are dominated by large profit-
funding agencies are remarkably inap- seeking corporations. As I write these
propriate for investigating integrative words, the effort to create a more sane
approaches, as they are for a wide swath and just system for funding health care
of the therapies currently being prac- is proceeding in the Congress, and by
ticed (see, for example, Westen, the time these words are published it
Novotny, & Thompson-Brenner, 2004). may even be the case that some of the
In what follows I wish to discuss this worst abuses of the system will have
state of affairs and to explicate not only
been modified at least a bit. But the cor-
why such increasingly consensual crite- porate dominance of health care, alas, is
ria as manuals and a focus on a single unlikely to change in the time frame rep-
diagnostic category are often inappro- resented by publication lag. This corpo-
priate but also why the insistence on rate dominance, with its corollary of
these criteria in fact reflects a crude, lim-
vast sums for propaganda and lobbying,
ited, and often ideologically driven un- ensures that debate and discussion
derstanding of science. about issues vital to both our field and
our society do not proceed on a level
We live in an era in which—for good
playing field. As everyone other than
reasons and bad—there is an increasing
the likes of John Roberts or Samuel Alito
call for evidence for the practices that
therapists engage in. The good reasons continued on page 36
35
#"$!%
understands, money talks; and when because it revealed itself in more overt
money talks, in the person of large, form, was the response of APA to House
wealthy corporations, the voices of flesh and Senate resolutions condemning an
and blood human beings—such as those article appearing in the Psychological
whose suffering it is our business to re- Bulletin ( Rind, Tromovitch, & Bauser-
lieve—are drowned out. man, 1998) that reviewed the available
research on the psychological conse-
The contours of this corporate influence quences of sexual relations between
are not very difficult to see in the overt adults and children and found consider-
political realm of debate on national ably less evidence for enduring harm
healthcare policy. Harder to evaluate is than is commonly assumed. In response
how the policies and grant criteria of the to this political pressure, in a highly un-
federal agencies that fund psychother- usual maneuver, APA requested that the
apy research might be influenced by the American Association for the Advance-
millions of dollars worth of lobbying ment of Science (AAAS) conduct a re-
and campaign contributions directed to view of the study. After studying APA‘s
the members of Congress who hold the request, the AAAS Committee on Scien-
purse strings for these agencies’ budg- tific Freedom and Responsibility refused
ets. To what degree is it pure coinci- to review the article, commenting that it
dence that, as discussed below (see also was not appropriate to “second-guess
Wachtel, in press; Westen, Novotny, and the peer review process” and indicating
Thompson-Brenner, 2004), the criteria that “after examining all the materials
for funding of psychotherapy outcome available to the Committee, we saw no
research tend to favor studies of the very clear evidence of improper application
kinds of treatments—brief and cheap— of methodology or other questionable
that benefit the bottom lines of insur- practices on the part of the article’s
ance companies and managed care cor- authors.” They went on to express
porations? To ask such a question is not “grave concerns with the politicization
to cast aspersions on those who set the of the debate over the article’s methods
policies and criteria for these agencies. and findings.” (Rind, Tromovitch, &
They are simply human, no different Bauserman, 2000).
from the rest of us. Huge quantities of
research in areas such as the sociology of This instructive incident was capable of
knowledge make it clear that scientific providing clear observational data, as it
discourse and procedure do not operate were, because it occurred after the fact;
in a vacuum, but are strongly shaped by the article had already been published.
the social context in which they operate, The influences I was primarily dis-
as well as that that social context is in cussing above are more in the realm of
turn strongly shaped by the power rela- what in legal discourse is called prior re-
tions that hold within—and maintain— straint. That is, my concern is with the
that context. An equally substantial studies that never see the light of day be-
body of research in cognitive science cause their proposed methodology does
and cognitive social psychology makes not fit the ideological strictures that
it clear that when people are in this way silently and covertly shape and constrict
influenced by a host of background vari- our thinking. Whether those strictures in
ables, they are very often unable to con- some part reflect the political and eco-
sciously notice or report that influence. nomic influences I have pointed to is at
One illustrative example of the influence this point speculative. But the existence
of Congressional pressure and broader and nature of those strictures is not. For
social climate that is easier to document, continued on page 41
36
#"$!%
The changes to the Division 29 bylaws that you are being asked to approve are:
In Article I, Section B is changed, updating the mission of the division. Further, Section C has been
removed since APA legal counsel advises that this is not actually accurate or relevant. These are is-
sues addressed in the APA bylaws and not needed in a division’s bylaws.
In Articles II through V, wording is cleaned up to ensure accuracy and clarity.
In Article VI the bylaws are updated to authorize the board to conduct business and vote via e-mail
and other electronic means. This allows greater efficiency and timeliness of the board’s work and
reduces expenses for the division. With this proposed change, Section G (4) is no longer needed so
it being removed. Section J is redundant due to being addressed elsewhere.
In Article VII, Section L, the wording is changed to create greater clarity and to ensure fairness.
In Article VIII, Section B, the sentence being removed is redundant with information provided else-
where.
Article X, Section A, as was written was inaccurate. It is being changed to reflect current dues practices.
The division sets its dues, not APA. In Section E the wording is changed to create greater clarity.
Article XI has been revised to reflect the actual structure of the division’s governance and the role
and mission of each committee. All terms of office, number of members on each committee, and
roles and duties have been updated for accuracy and consistency. The definition of diversity has
been updated to reflect the definition provided in the most current version of the APA Ethics Code.
In Articles XI and XIII the wording has been updated to reflect clarity and accuracy.
Article XIV has been updated to authorize a student member to serve on the Publications and Com-
munications Board. The Publications Board and Board of Directors find this to be an important
change for the future of the division, ensuring student input in all deliberations about the division’s
publications.
In Article XV the suggested wording change clarifies duties and responsibilities with regard to
amendments.
New Article XVI adds a conflict of interest statement.
Thank you for your careful reading of these proposed bylaws and for your ongoing support of Di-
vision 29. We respectfully request your approval of the revisions to the bylaws. You may indicate
your vote using the ballot in this issue of the Psychotherapy Bulletin.
On behalf of the Division 29 Board of Directors,
Jeffrey Barnett, Psy.D., ABPP
Division 29 Past-President
NO! I reject all the bylaws changes as proposed by the Division 29 Board of Directors
37
#"$!%
Name (Printed)
______________________________________
Signature
______________________________________
Fold Here.
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
Division29
Central Office
6557 E. Riverdale St.
Mesa, AZ 85215
Fold Here.
#"$!%
Division 29 seeks great leaders! Bring our best talent to the Division of Psychotherapy (29) as we
put our combined talents to work for the advancement of psychotherapy.
Domain Representatives are voting members of the Board of Directors. They are responsible for
creative initiatives and oversight of the Division’s portfolios in Early Career, Science & Scholar-
ship, and Diversity (one of two Diversity Representatives). Candidates should have demon-
strated interest and investment in the area of their Domain.
Return the attached nomination ballot in the mail. The deadline for receipt of all nominations ballots
is December 31, 2009. We cannot accept faxed copies. Original signatures must accompany ballot.
EXERCISE YOUR CHOICE NOW!
If you would like to discuss your own interest or any recommendations for identifying talent in our
division, please feel free to contact the division’s Chair of Nominations and Elections, Dr. Libby
Nutt Williams at (240) 895-4467 or by Email at enwilliams@smcm.edu
Sincerely,
Nadine Kaslow, Ph.D. Jeffrey J. Magnavita, Ph.D. Elizabeth Nutt Williams, Ph.D.
President President-elect Chair, Nominations and Elections
NOMINATION BALLOT
President-elect Council Representative
____________________________________ ____________________________________
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Domain Representative—Diversity
____________________________________
____________________________________
Indicate your nominees, and mail now! In order for your ballot to be counted, you must put
your signature in the upper left hand corner of the reverse side where indicated.
39
#"$!%
Name (Printed)
______________________________________
Signature
______________________________________
Fold Here.
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
Division29
Central Office
6557 E. Riverdale St.
Mesa, AZ 85215
Fold Here.
#"$!%
those strictures derive from a second of science are not widely challenged,
ideological thrust, emanating from when these students graduate, they will
within our own profession, and the ad- in turn teach still another generation of
vocates of this second interest group students what they themselves were
have been far from covert or subtle. Or- taught, and the tight circle of restricted
ganizing “task forces,” these advocates knowledge will be further perpetuated.
have, to this point, successfully man-
aged to dominate the field’s understand- Now, I am aware that in referring to
ing of and criteria for what constitutes “empirically validated” treatments I am
appropriate research on psychotherapy not using the rhetoric du jour. The
outcome, and their views are closely names of these lists keep mutating like
paralleled in the policies of funding they are in a race with the flu virus. In a
agencies such as NIMH. Here we may relatively brief span of years we have al-
add, apropos the above discussion, that ready had “well established,” “probably
efficacious,” “empirically validated,”
there is little likelihood that these criteria
will be countered or undermined by the “empirically supported,” and “evi-
insurance lobby, because, whether coin- dence-based” as the label for the lists,
cidental or not, the task force positions and it is unclear what the flavor of the
fit their needs hand in glove. day will be tomorrow. Such rapidly
shifting sands suggest a fundamental
The criteria, assumptions, and standards unease with what is being perpetrated
I wish to discuss here have, further, been that is being repeatedly covered over by
associated with “lists” of therapies strategic rebranding. The basic product,
whose evidence comports with those however, has remained largely the same
standards, and, because these criteria
have become influential in funding Now strictly speaking, as these advo-
agencies as well, they operate as self-ful- cates present it, these are not lists of
filling prophecies which virtually ensure those therapies that have been validated
that treatments presumed not to have and those that have not, but only the for-
empirical support will continue (at least mer; how one views the latter (the ther-
by the standards currently being prom- apies not on the list) is left up to the
ulgated) to be empirically unsupported. perceiver. But as Chevy Chase well cap-
If one of the criteria for empirical valida- tured on Saturday Night Live, with his
tion is that the treatment be manualized, sign-on for his faux news report (“I’m
(I discuss other problematic elements in Chevy Chase....and you’re not!”), stating
the EVT paradigm in Wachtel, in press), one thing can quite readily evoke the
then by fiat and definition, not by data, neural circuits that represent its implicit
treatments that are not manualized opposite. The list-makers may not say
cannot be designated as empirically that those therapies that are not listed as
validated. This is the case, if one stays validated on their lists have been show
within these highly tendentious criteria, to not be valid; but if they think as psy-
even if—as in many instances is the chologists, not logic-choppers, the impli-
case—there is a very large and impres- cation is obvious.
sive body of data that demonstrate their
effectiveness (see, for example, Shedler, This confusion is problematic for a num-
in press). In graduate schools around the ber of different reasons. First, the advo-
country, the new generation of clinicians cacy groups that have promulgated
and researchers is being very largely these lists have done so not simply as a
taught the dogma of “empirically vali- summary for cutting edge researchers, a
dated” and manualized treatments— kind of abstract to an article whose im-
and if the limits of this advocacy version continued on page 42
41
#"$!%
plications are really only clear if one has These days they make their sales pitch
“read the full article” (that is, if one is so- in the classroom, where the teaching of
phisticated enough about the nature and manualized treatments often dominates
the limits of the research). Rather, they the curriculum of training programs in
have advocated making these lists our field.)
widely available to the general public,
supposedly to guide people in choosing In the investigation of integrative thera-
more wisely the kind of therapy they peutic approaches, the limits of the
will seek. Indeed, they have more than traditional EVT methodology are espe-
advocated this; they have done it. cially severe. A growing number of
prominent researchers have commented
Such an approach to disseminating in different ways on the limits of prom-
knowledge is difficult to distinguish ulgating lists of supposedly validated
from the ads from drug companies that treatments or on the limits of the
saturate the airwaves (which also, after methodological assumptions on which
all, are based on data – and also, very those lists are based (e.g., Westen,
often, primarily on the data congenial to Novotny, & Thompson-Brenner, 2004;
the conclusions they wished to reach in Goldfried & Wolfe, 1996, 1998; Trier-
the first place). Do these ads make pa- weiler & Stricker, 1998). Rather than list-
tients more savvy consumers? Perhaps ing the brand names of the therapies
in certain ways. But in “liberating” the that have made the cut according to the
consumer from reliance on their doctors’ EVT methodology, many of these critics
knowledge and expertise, and substitut- have suggested, it is more productive to
ing their amateur night understanding focus on the fundamental principles
in its place, it is not clear that patients of therapeutic change (e.g., Beutler,
are in fact well served. Having more in- Clarkin, & Bongar, 2000, Bohart, 2000,
formed patients is a good thing. Doctors Castonguay & Beutler, 2003, Rosen &
are not infallible, and they are often Davison, 2003). I have myself written on
overworked and potentially prone to these issues in a forthcoming book
neglect a possibility that should be in- (Wachtel, in press). I will therefore limit
cluded in the mix of considerations. But myself to a single issue here, a kind of
it is far from clear that advocacy adver- sample of the larger set of issues that
tising is the best guarantor of useful have concerned many critics of this
knowledge or sophisticated understand- “EVT list” movement. That issue is the
ing. (Of course, it can be countered that
requirement that a therapy be manual-
the doctors too are often informed more
ized in order to even consider it with re-
by agents looking to sell a product than
gard to empirical validation or support.
by disinterested research. Where do the
doctors themselves learn much of what
Strictly speaking, the advocacy groups
they know about the medications they
to which I have been referring rarely
prescribe? Often from “seminars” in
state that a manual is a requirement.
lovely vacation spots that are sponsored
Usually the language is some version of
by drug companies, or at dinners in
“a manual or some other means of en-
posh restaurants, where an industry rep
suring that the treatment being admin-
treats a group of doctors to filet mignon
istered is the treatment the investigators
while informing them of the company’s
latest product and the “research” that claim to be evaluating.” On the face of
supports it. In contrast, those in our field it, this is a perfectly reasonable demand.
who inform therapists about the thera- The problem with “manuals or some
pies on “the list” don’t need to take other appropriate means of evaluating”
them out to dinner to sell their wares. continued on page 43
42
#"$!%
is that in the real world this so often noted that a broader statement on evi-
comes down to “manuals or no research dence-based practice approved by the
grant.” Westen et al (2004) and a variety entire APA Council of Representatives in
of other commentators have noted that 2005 (http://www2.apa.org/practice/
if one looks at the daily realities of ap- ebpstatement.pdf)—in contrast to the
plying for research grants, it is easier for statements by the Division 12 task forces
a camel to pass through the eye of a nee- or a number of its members in separate
dle than for an investigator to get a sub- publications—does not specify manuals
stantial grant to investigate the outcome as a requirement. This does not, how-
of a non-manualized treatment. Thus, ever, alter the state of affairs in granting
what we have is a caricature of science agencies or in classrooms in large num-
in which prejudices cannot be chal- bers of clinical programs).
lenged because the prejudices are
woven into the criteria for investigating In explicating why manualization is not
those prejudices. This is science by essential for the aim for which it was
methodological fiat rather than science originally introduced—namely, ensur-
by observation. The observations never ing that the treatment nominally being
get made, because by a self-fulfilling evaluated is the treatment actually being
prophecy, certain therapeutic ap- evaluated—I wish to return to a study I
proaches (namely, non-manualized conducted many years ago which I had
treatments) are not deemed worthy of largely forgotten about until I began
receiving grants to investigate their thinking about the limitations of the
efficacy, and so their efficacy remains dogma of manualization. In a study
unexamined and, of necessity, undocu- published in 1970, Jean Schimek and I
mented. Especially is this the case (Wachtel, & Schimek, 1970) were inter-
for many integrative therapeutic ap- ested in the effects of emotionally toned
proaches. By their very nature, integra- incidental stimuli on the mood, fan-
tive approaches tend to be more tasies, and thought processes of individ-
complex. After all, they contain elements uals. In contrast to most studies to that
from several different approaches, and point, which, if they investigated inci-
there are likely to be many more options dental or subliminal stimuli, tended to
and choice points for the integrative use very specific, discrete content (par-
therapist than for the therapist who fol- ticular words, pictures, etc) we were in-
lows a manual or a strictly laid out terested in the impact of a factor that
singular path. Given that a very signifi- influences so much of our daily life—the
cant percentage of therapists describe emotional tone of the various stimuli we
themselves as integrative or eclectic encounter in the course of the day. To
(Norcross, Karpiak, & Santoro, 2005; this end, we created an experimental
Norcross, Hedges, & Castle, 2002), and situation in which subjects were admin-
that in many respects integrative prac- istered several TAT cards and partici-
tice represents the cutting edge of our pated in various other measures while,
field, this is a serious issue. We need to through the walls from next door, came
be able to evaluate these integrative ap- sounds indicating either an argument or
proaches, and in order to do so, we need a happy gathering with laughter. Sub-
to extricate ourselves from the method- jects could not hear any specific words,
ological stranglehold that has been cre- but they could pick up the emotional
ated by the EVT list mindset and has tone of what was going on. After careful
come to be equated in the minds of and intensive debriefing, only 3 out of
many in our field with the idea of em- 60 subjects indicated that they thought
pirical validation itself. (It should be continued on page 44
43
#"$!%
the sounds they were hearing had any- cantly from one condition to the other.
thing to do with the study they were
participating in (many thought it was a Applying this experience to the realm of
television playing next door), but almost psychotherapy outcome research, the
all, when their attention was directed implication is that instead of requiring a
after the fact to thinking about what manual, one might do just as well (and,
they had heard, could reliably indicate since it permits more approaches to be
what the emotional tone was. Thus, al- seriously evaluated, might do better)
though the stimuli were, for most sub- simply by asking therapists identified
jects, not in focal awareness, they were with the particular approaches being
incidental, not subliminal, and what was evaluated in the study to determine, in
registered was affective tone not explicit blind ratings based on tapes or tran-
content. scripts, how much the work in the ses-
sion actually conformed to what should
One chief aim of the study was to assess go on in such a therapy. Especially does
angry content in the TAT stories the sub- this strategy make sense when one takes
jects told and to compare the degree of into account that in fact it is never “the
such content in the two experimental manual” that enables the determination
conditions. To this end we made elabo- of whether the nominal approach was
rate efforts to spell out very explicitly actually followed but rather it is the
what the criteria would be for angry adherence checks—determining if the
content. In essence, we were trying to therapists followed the manual—that
create a “manual” for the scoring of the are the real methodological safeguard.
stories. This approach to the assessment Thus, what I am suggesting essentially
was tedious and laborious, but even entails simply using adherence checks
more important, after spending quite a without a manual, adherence checks
bit of time on this effort, we were both based, as were the ratings of anger in the
very discouraged; the scoring using the study I just described, on the human ca-
successive versions of the “manual” had pacity to detect relational and emotional
very low inter-rater reliability and did phenomena with a subtlety and adroit-
not discriminate very well between the ness that is often more than the sum of
two experimental conditions. (Through- the parts of a manual (again on this
out the process of attempting to develop point, see Polanyi). In this fashion, “non-
this manual, the raters were blind as to manualized” treatments, such as many
which condition the stories being rated in the realm of integrative psychotherapy,
came from; the tallying of these scores may be seen to be much more accessible
was always done by a separate party). to rigorous evaluation than the dogma
Finally, almost in desperation, we of the EVT criteria would suggest.
turned to a more “naive,” less method-
ologically “fancy” approach—we sim- Even better perhaps than the approach I
ply said, let’s see what happens if the have just described is the employment,
instructions are simply “rate how angry again without the treatment being man-
the stories seem,” without any specific ualized, of ratings based on measures
or detailed guidelines for what to look such as the Psychotherapy Process Q-
for or check off (that is, without a “man- Sort [PQS] (Jones, 2000; see also Ablon &
ual”). This approach, which relied, es- Jones, 1998, Jones & Pulos, 1993), an in-
sentially, on what Michael Polanyi (1956, strument designed not to detect the
1967) has called tacit knowledge, presence of brand name packages, but
worked like a charm. The reliabilities rather of very specific kinds of com-
were quite satisfactory and the degree of ments and behaviors. It is ironic that ad-
anger rated in the stories varied signifi- continued on page 45
44
#"$!%
vocates of the EVT list approach, who, standing. The psychotherapy integra-
under the banner of precision and speci- tion movement evolved in good part as
ficity, advocate restricting the patient a counter to this “turf war” approach to
sample to a single Axis I diagnosis, place science and to our field . For this alter-
such enormous emphasis on the anoint- native to evolve further, and to be en-
ing of rather global “packages” of inter- abled to develop empirical foundations
ventions, which, when closely as fully as possible, attention must be di-
examined, often represent a hodge- rected to exposing further the limita-
podge of actual elements and interven- tions of the false science that has
tions (Shedler, in press; Wachtel, in restricted funding of integrative re-
press; Westen, et al, 2004). search and led to the miseducation of
much of a generation of graduate stu-
The PQS approach addresses itself not dents. The scientific investigation of
to validating brand names, but to exam- what really accounts for success or fail-
ining the processes and specific inter- ure in psychotherapy is too important a
ventions that account for therapeutic public need to be sacrificed to a crude
success. The brand name approach un- caricature of the scientific method.
derlying the EVT lists reflects thinly dis-
guised turf wars rather than science and References available on-line at www.divi-
yields consistently superficial under- sionofpsychotherapy.org
45
#"$!%
CONGRATULATONS TO
THE DIVISION OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
2009 DISTINGUISHED PSYCHOLOGISTS!
Dr. Jeffrey Barnett made the following remarks in awarding Norine G. Johnson, the re-
cipient of the Division of Psychotherapy’s 2009 Distinguished Psychologist Award:
I will offer some information regarding Norine’s participation in the division
in consideration of her nomination for 2009 Distinguished Psychologist of the
Division of Psychotherapy.
Norine was a member of the Board as an elected member at
large for two terms and during that time, supported the divi-
sion in advancing psychotherapy in APA and in psychological
practice. She has been a Fellow of the Division for over ten
years. She was director of the Dept. of Psychology for 18 years
at Kennedy Memorial Hospital for Children where she special-
ized in advancing psychotherapy in working with children.
Dr. Johnson was 2001 President of APA during 9/11 and devoted much of her
presidency to the development of psychological services for those affected by
the tragedy and the advancement of psychology as a health profession. During
her presidency, she also planted the seeds of what has come to be known as the
re-sequencing of training, specifically the role of the post doctoral experience
in training. These years later, Norine’s proposal has come to fruition in the
Council vote for re-sequencing the training requirements. Norine was instru-
mental in the development and adoption of the Guidelines for Psychological
Practice with Women and Girls. She also was the sponsor of the Council item
to officially change the term “therapy” to “psychotherapy” as used by psy-
chologists and in official documents of APA. This was an extremely important
action that promoted the continued primary stance of psychotherapy in the
practice of psychology. Lastly, Dr. Johnson is in her second term of represen-
tation of our Division as Council Representative. Norine Johnson has made
singular and significant contributions to the division and on behalf of the di-
vision in the advancement of psychotherapy. Additionally, Norine has been a
strong advocate for advancing psychotherapy internationally.
Jon Carlson, PsyD, EdD, ABPP is Distinguished Professor, Psy-
chology and Counseling at Governors State University and a
psychologist at the Wellness Clinic in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin.
Jon has served as editor of several periodicals including the
Journal of Individual Psychology and The Family Journal. He holds
Diplomates in both Family Psychology and Adlerian Psychol-
ogy. He has authored 150 journal articles and 50 books includ-
ing Time for a Better Marriage, Adlerian Therapy, Inclusive Cultural
Empathy, The Mummy at the Dining Room Table, Bad Therapy, The Client Who
Changed Me, Their Finest Hour, Creative Breakthroughs in Therapy, and Moved by the
Spirit. He has created over 250 professional trade video and DVD’s with leading
professional therapists and educators. In 2004 the American Counseling Associ-
ation named him a “Living Legend.” Recently he syndicated an advice cartoon
On The Edge with cartoonist Joe Martin. Jon and Laura have been married for
forty-two years and are the parents of five children.
46
#"$!%
WASHINGTON SCENE
Exciting Times for Those with Vision
Pat DeLeon, Ph.D.
Former APA President
Action In The Far the House. All in all, we remain opti-
West: For those of us mistic, look forward to a 2010 Hawaii
who appreciate the Gubernatorial race, and are determined
broader public policy as ever to see RxP become a reality in
and particularly, the our state.
public health aspects
of psychology obtain- In Oregon, Robin Henderson reports:
ing prescriptive au- Oregon had a wild ride this year in pur-
thority (RxP), the efforts of visionaries in suit of prescription privileges. We en-
Hawaii and Oregon this past legislative tered the Session strong, with HB 2702,
session were truly exciting. After the and bipartisan support from every key
Governor vetoed their bill in July, 2007, healthcare legislator in Oregon. Starting
Robin Miyamoto and her colleagues on the House side of the building, pro-
were successful in having their commu- ponents and opponents battled through
nity health center-oriented legislation details in Rep. Mitch Greenlick’s Health-
pass the Hawaii Senate in March by a care Committee—the same committee
wide margin. Jill Oliveira Gray: that was crafting Oregon’s landmark
omnibus healthcare bill—HB 2009. It
The HPA RxP committee was encour- was tough to get hearings scheduled,
aged by an even stronger endorsement but Rep. Greenlick was a co-sponsor of
this year by the Hawaii Primary Care HB 2702, and safely shepherded the bill
Association, who announced that they through his Committee. On the House
were not only going to support the RxP floor, HB 2702A enjoyed strong support
bill, but rather, make RxP one of their from House members, passing easily
top three legislative initiatives for 2009. with a vote of 47-11 for journey to the
In addition, continued support and in- Senate. Oregon’s two psychologist leg-
creased lobbying efforts by the Mental islators, Rep. Phil Barnhart and Rep. Bill
Health Association of America, Hawaii Kennemer gave passionate speeches
Medical Services Association (HMSA), about the bill and why this version was
and the local chapter of the National As- right for Oregon. Victory was sweet—
sociation of Social Workers, helped to but the battle was just beginning to in-
diffuse the classic turf war between psy- tensify. The journey was not as easy in
chologists and psychiatrists and focus the Senate. Opponents of our bill used
on the issue of access to care in med- traditional means to obfuscate the facts
ically underserved areas. Hawaii’s SB around safety and training, and sent
428 SD1 passed out of the Senate with an many Senators scrambling for the hills
overwhelmingly supportive vote of 21- with the sheer volume of information
4. Unfortunately, due to the recent elec- both sides brought to the table. People
tion year that managed to stir things up from all over the country sent e-mails in
in the legislature there were some unan- favor and opposed to the issue, creating
ticipated changes we had to contend new small fires to extinguish each day.
with given new members and shifting Our lobbying team … remained well on
committee position appointments. In the top of the issues … but at the end of the
end, SB 428 SD1 despite its success in the
Senate, could not maintain its traction in continued on page 48
47
#"$!%
battle, this was not to be our year … ship. As our nation’s health care system
Under intense political pressure, Ore- advances into the 21st century, with its
gon’s psychologists were asked by key ever sophisticated communications
legislators to agree to one last work- technology (e.g., computerized records
group, staffed by a professional mediator, and virtual realities), psychology could
to sort through the details of prescribing and should play a major role in ensuring
in Oregon. Psychiatrists proposed a large, that patients become truly “educated
unwieldy process for consideration, and consumers.”
psychologists proposed a small, time-
limited workgroup with three psycholo- Health Literacy: During the first days of
gists, two psychiatrists, a primary care the Obama Administration the Congress
physician, and a pharmacist. Our version enacted the President’s far-reaching Eco-
prevailed, and passed the Senate 23-4. A nomic Stimulus proposal, The American
disappointed House concurred a few Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
days later, emphasizing their desire that (P.L. 111-5). This legislation incorporated
this bill prevail in February, 2010 and the Health Information Technology for
strengthening their resolve to see this Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH)
through. Now Oregon will move to the Act, with the goal of promoting the
interim work of the mandatory work- widespread adoption of health informa-
group. Senator Laurie Monnes-Anderson tion technology (HIT) for the electronic
and Rep. Bill Kennemer will personally sharing of clinical data among hospitals,
oversee these proceedings and guarantee health care providers, and other-health
that a bill will be presented in the Febru- care stakeholders. The Stimulus legisla-
ary, 2010 special session. Thanks to all tion raised the budget of the HIT
around the country who have supported National Coordinator’s office from
us—we’re doing our very best to bring approximately $66 million in FY’09 to
RxP to Oregon. $2 billion, with numerous health policy
experts suggesting that the federal
The Importance Of Addressing Soci- government’s overall investment for
ety’s Needs: Former APA State Advo- HIT would reach $19+ billion as a result
cacy guru, Mike Sullivan reflecting upon of the stimulus package. This is a very
psychology’s RxP quest: It is no coinci- impressive accomplishment for the new
dence that the first states to enact pre- Administration and one with many long
scriptive authority are states that term policy implications, including
traditionally have been ranked at or heralding the era of “educated con-
near the bottom in the nation on meas- sumers,” as the unprecedented advances
ures of health and mental health for occurring within the communications
their citizens. Offering a new solution to and technology fields are finally directly
enormous mental health and public applied to our nation’s health care arena.
health problems made psychologists
credible and persuasive to their legisla- The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has
tors and governors. As a result, prescrib-been studying an interesting (and often
ing psychologists in New Mexico and overlooked) aspect of this evolution.
Louisiana have been able to offer quality In 2004 and 2009, the IOM published
care to underserved citizens in their reports exploring what might be consid-
states... by practicing a psychological ered a “silent epidemic”—Health Liter-
model of pharmacotherapy. acy. “Clear communication is critical to
successful health care.” Today, nearly
As members of our nation’s educated half of all American adults, 90 million
elite, psychologists have a societal re- people, have difficulty understanding
sponsibility to provide visionary leader- continued on page 49
48
#"$!%
and acting upon health information. to accelerate the development and de-
That is, they possess limited health liter- ployment of HIT. Some analysts, how-
acy which is more than reading, as it in- ever, are concerned that these systems
cludes writing, numeracy, listening, could actually increase health care dis-
speaking, and conceptual knowledge. parities by helping mainly those indi-
Approximately 40 million citizens can viduals and communities with greater
perform simple and routine tasks using resources, noting that underserved pop-
uncomplicated materials, with an addi- ulations generally include ethnic mi-
tional 50 million adults able to locate in- norities, people in lower socioeconomic
formation in moderately complicated groups, and individuals with lower ed-
texts, make inferences using print mate- ucational and reading levels. These pop-
rials, and integrate easily identifiable ulations also tend to have limited access
pieces of information. However, they to computer technology.
find it difficult to perform these tasks
when complicated by distracting infor- A major focus of the Economic Stimulus
mation and complex texts. Over 300 legislation is to encourage hospitals and
studies, conducted over three decades practitioners to more actively engage in
and assessing various health-related ma- HIT. Yet, this is within the overall con-
terials, such as informed consent forms text that studies have consistently
and medication package inserts, have shown that more than 80 percent of In-
found that a mismatch exists between ternet users report searching online for
the reading levels of the materials and health information. The rate for those
the reading skills of the intended audi- with chronic conditions is 86 percent.
ence. Most of the materials exceed the More than half of consumers (58 per-
reading skills of the average high school cent) who search for online health infor-
graduate. mation report that what they found
affected their health decisions, with 39
There is the definite expectation at the percent reporting the information
health policy level that the increasing changed the way they cope with a
use of emerging interactive health infor- chronic condition or manage pain. Thus,
mation technology (HIT or eHealth) will it is vitally important to provide individ-
help to improve the quality, capacity, uals with the skills essential for accu-
and efficiency of the health care system. rately responding to the potentials of
This should increase the capacity to pro- eHealth, while keeping in mind the
vide tailored and individually cus- “three-click rule.” That is, one must get
tomized treatment protocols, improve users to the information in three clicks
clinical decision making and adherence or face the real possibility of simply los-
to clinical guidelines; provide reminder ing them.
systems for patients and clinicians,
thereby improving compliance with pre- eHealth literacy is growing in impor-
ventive service protocols; and help pre- tance. Consumer-directed electronic
vent many errors and adverse events. tools are transforming the way that con-
Currently, adults receive only about half sumers receive and utilize information.
of recommended health care services Two types of skills are necessary for
and less than 50 percent of adults receive eHealth—general skills and specific
the preventive and screening tests called skills. General skills apply to a number
for in guidelines for their age and sex. A of different contexts and settings and in-
recent Commonwealth Fund survey clude traditional literacy (reading, writ-
found that the highest-rated strategy by ing, and numeracy), media literacy
health care opinion leaders to improve
the quality and safety of health care was continued on page 50
49
#"$!%
(media analysis skills), and information books, pamphlets, and websites. They
literacy (information seeking and under- are, therefore, unable to understand that
standing). Specific skills include such one may have to triangulate pieces of in-
things as computer literacy (IT skills), formation from different sources to
health literacy (health knowledge com- build an entire picture.
prehension), and science literacy (sci-
ence process and outcome). The specific skills involved in eHealth
include computer literacy, science liter-
Forty percent of Americans have low lit- acy, and health literacy. Computer liter-
eracy, making it difficult for them to acy is a general awareness of and skills
function in everyday society. Thus, if in using computer-based technology to
eHealth interventions are largely text- solve problems. It relates to both com-
based, 4 out of every 10 people who puters and to the kind of technologies
might benefit from the intervention will that surround the use of computers,
have a great deal of difficulty reading such as the use of a keyboard, mouse, or
the material. In case of mathematical lit- printer. Science literacy is an under-
eracy (numeracy), one-quarter of the standing of the nature, aims, methods,
U.S. 15-year olds scored at or below the application, limitations and politics of
lowest proficiency level. To the extent creating knowledge in a systematic
that eHealth involves simple mathemati- manner. Approximately 17 percent of
cal calculations such as addition or sub- Americans are considered able to under-
traction, or an understanding of numbers, stand basic science. Thus, 83 percent
those with low numeracy skills will likely lack an understanding of the cumula-
find it difficult to understand the informa- tive, dynamic nature of scientific knowl-
tion presented, reading maps, or under- edge. They are not aware that science
standing simple charts. Media literacy can be understood and used by non-sci-
refers to the skills necessary to think crit- entists and they are unfamiliar with sim-
ically and to act based on information ple science terminology, the process of
from media-based messages. Media lit- discovery, or how scientific knowledge
eracy places information in a social and is translated into practice. Finally,
political context and considers issues eHealth demands health literacy skills.
such as the marketplace, audience rela-
Seventy-three percent of individuals
tions, and the role of the medium in the
with a chronic condition have searched
message. Those with low media literacy
online for information and those with
lack awareness of bias or perspective in
chronic conditions were more likely
media pronouncements, both in terms of
than others to report that the results of
what is being presented and what is not
an online search influenced their health
presented. They also have difficulty un-
and care behavior related to their condi-
derstanding that the media has both ex-
tion. In designing a seamless system for
plicit and implied messages and they
the future, we must not forget that those
have difficulty deriving meaning from
with low health literacy have difficulty
media messages. The third general skill,
following simple self-care directions or
information literacy, involves a more
prescription instructions. eHealth liter-
general understanding of information.
acy is growing in importance. “A major
An information literate person knows
goal [in implementing HIT] is to moti-
how information is organized, how to
find information, and to use information vate behavior change that will lead to
in a way that others can learn from. Low improved health. However, the people
information literacy individuals are un- who are experts in behavior modifica-
able to see connections between infor- tion and behavior change don’t seem to
mation from multiple sources such as continued on page 51
50
#"$!%
have played a major role to date.” We quality health care, and our nation’s
were very pleased to see colleagues overall quality of life could not be
Dyanne Affonso, Eric Chudler, and clearer.
Jessie Gruman actively involved in
shaping the IOM views. The interrela- Aloha,
tionship between education, access to Pat DeLeon, former APA President
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
51
#"$!%
PRACTITIONER REPORT
Practice Update — November 2009
Jennifer F. Kelly, Ph.D.
Independent Practice and Atlanta Center for
Behavioral Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
The primary mission icy issues that will be considered by the
of the Practice Do- APA and APA governance, and business
main of Division 29 is of practice and advocacy issues that
to focus on the issues will be addressed by the APAPO and
related to practice. Committee for the Advancement of Pro-
Following is an up- fessional Practice. In addition, we collab-
date of the progress orated with non-psychology groups to
and challenges en- incorporate a broader public perspective
countered in 2009. As most of you know, into our work. We believe that develop-
the Practice community continues to ing partnerships with these outside
face substantial challenges in a number groups will be key to implementing our
of critical areas, but at the same time practice agenda.
Practice has scored several hard fought
victories. At the Summit we identified new mod-
els and venues for practice, looked at
Probably one of the greatest achieve- ways to expand opportunities and iden-
ments of APA as it relates to Practice was tified opportunities that traverse tradi-
the APA Presidential Summit on the tional practice domains. A primary
Future of Psychology Practice held outcome of the Summit was to develop
May 14-16, 2009 in San Antonio, Texas. a clear agenda for the future of our
The Summit was a collaborative effort multi-faceted and diverse practice com-
among different partners of the practice munity. The Task Force met for the final
community. In addition to assembling meeting in September 2009, and a report
leaders in the practice of psychology, with the noted recommendations will be
other professionals who are critical completed and forwarded to Council.
stakeholders in the practice of psychol-
ogy participated. The following objec- Of equal, if not greater, importance to
tives were addressed: Practice is the ongoing legislative advo-
cacy program undertaken by the APA
1. Models and opportunities for future Practice Organization’s government re-
practice to meet the needs of our di- lations department. There have been nu-
verse public merous legislative successes over the
2. Priorities for psychologists practic- past year that impact on the Practice of
ing in private and public settings Psychology. They include the following:
3. Resources needed to effectively ad- The Health Information Technology.
dress the priorities The Health Information Technology bill
4. Roles of various practice groups in has passed with several major compo-
implementing the priorities nents contributed by psychology’s leg-
islative advocacy team. Included in the
5. Key partnerships to implement our
bill is strong privacy protection for pa-
agenda
tients obtaining psychological services.
During the Summit, we addressed pol- continued on page 53
52
#"$!%
Medicare. There is both positive and tion over the Medicare portion of health
negative news concerning Medicare re- reform, also passed a bill favorable to
imbursement. Congress has reversed psychology.
two Medicare payment cuts that were
scheduled to occur this year. In addition, The key provisions in health care reform
we have been successful in getting a pertaining to professional psychology
provision to reduce the mental health are the 5 percent restoration of the
beneficiary co-payment (from 50% down Medicare reimbursement rate cut, inte-
to 20%) which will achieve parity with grated care, and replacing the Medicare
medical care by 2014. Unfortunately, The “sustainable growth rate” (SGR) pay-
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Serv- ment formula. It is good to know that
ices (CMS) have announced changes in the 5 percent Medicare restoration pro-
2010 to Medicare’s payments for the vision has the support of both House
practice expense portion of numerous and Senate committees of jurisdiction.
services including those commonly billed For integrated care, the Practice Organi-
by psychologists. It is expected that zation favors the Senate HELP Commit-
Medicare payments for psychological tee bill as it includes broad provisions
services will be reduced on average by for care integration throughout the new
7% based on the practice expense health system. This integration fully in-
changes. Efforts are underway to attempt corporates all providers, including men-
to modify these reductions. tal and behavioral health providers. It is
anticipated that the Senate will still ad-
Health Care Reform. APA has been in- dress the scheduled 21 percent SGR cut
volved in the ongoing healthcare reform to Medicare provider reimbursements
debate to ensure that psychological serv- by the end of the year. However, most
ices are a core benefit in all health plans likely it will be a one-year fix, as origi-
in the new health system and integral to nally intended by Senator Max Baucus’
patient care in all settings. On October (Chair of the Senate Finance Committee)
13, 2009, the Senate Finance Committee health care reform bill.
passed its bill after months of consider-
ation. Health care reform legislation has This will be my last column as my term
now been approved by all five congres- as member-at-large/Practice Domain
sional committees of jurisdiction. The Representative will end in December
House bills and the Senate Health, Edu- 2009. It has been an honor to be a part of
cation, Labor and Pensions (HELP) the Division. Finally, I would like to thank
Committee bill all include key provi- Drs. Bonita Cade and Dr. Patricia Cough-
sions that are favorable for professional lin for their service to Division 29 by serv-
psychology. In addition, the Senate ing on the Practice Domain Committee.
Finance Committee, which has jurisdic-
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
53
#"$!%
54
#"$!%
FEATURE
A Psychotherapist’s Self-Care Guide for
Our Current Economic Debacle: Some Suggestions
Leon J. Hoffman, Ph.D., ABPP, FAGPA, CGP
Private Practice, Chicago, Illinois
How are the current economically chal- tency they deserve? After all, the role of
lenging times affecting the way we psy- excellent psychotherapists is the same as
chotherapists practice? that of excellent parents. That is, to pro-
vide well for those in their care. Perfec-
I have some suggestions pertaining to tion is never the goal; rather, the goal is
this and any other “life ambush” to always adequacy.
which we are exposed. The current eco-
nomic debacle is but one. Other life chal- Some further questions may be helpful,
lenges might include terrorist attacks, or albeit anxiety-provoking.
other sudden, unexpected health, mari-
tal, occupational, natural (Katrina), and How do you function under this eco-
legal assaults. Some psychotherapists nomic siege? Do you find yourself jealous
may be currently experiencing one, or of any of your patients or colleagues? Do
more, of these ambushes. We should re- you envy them their successes? Not all
mind ourselves, and help our patients to psychotherapists have financially thriv-
realize, that financial distresses are not ing patients. If you do, what special
the only losses that may result from stresses do you feel when you treat them?
these financially challenging times. If you are suffering economically and
Some of the most pernicious results of your patient is thriving financially, do
these difficulties are not financial, but you notice any lapse of judgment or dis-
emotional. tortions in your usual wisdom that pre-
dispose you to moral, ethical, and
Our psychological responses to these perhaps even legal risk? Do you feel sur-
puzzling times contribute significantly vivor guilt because you are doing well
to our anxieties. It is crucial to under- while some of your colleagues are suffer-
stand those anxieties. We must be able ing more than you and may even have
to discriminate between whether the lost their jobs? Do you experience antici-
anxieties we feel are “merely” discom- patory anxiety from awaiting that “knock
fort or actually signal danger. We help on the door” announcing that you are
our patients to recognize this distinction. next to lose something?
Many psychotherapies encourage pa-
Are your patient case load and referral
tients to become curious, to be reflective.
flow diminishing? Are your fees and re-
That is a goal of this article—to help us
ceivables down? Are patients asking to
as psychotherapists to explore and
end their psychotherapy, reduce the fre-
study our circumstances. Please remem-
quency of their needed sessions, or re-
ber: Diagnosis first, treatment second.
duce their fees? Do patients simply not
First we evaluate, then we act.
show up, begin to come late, attempt to
In what ways are your psychotherapy reschedule often, or not pay their bills
practices influenced by current eco- promptly? Does the area of the country
nomic uncertainties? How do you main- in which you practice affect your spe-
tain your centeredness and balance so cific patient population (e.g., Detroit and
that your patients receive the consis- continued on page 56
55
#"$!%
the auto industry)? Are patients relocat- to do so; it is even more so in these try-
ing? What provisions are you making ing times.
for their continuing psychotherapy in
order to minimize disruptions in their Whatever our life stresses, they should
care? These and plenty of other night- never become the patients’ burden. So,
marish scenarios are enough to cause let’s lighten the load—for us, and for
anxiety in even the most stalwart of psy- them. All patients deserve and need an
chotherapists. attentive, rested, balanced psychothera-
pist. Our focus must always be on them
Are you noticing increases in negative, and their needs. Anything interrupting
or ambivalent, or aim-attached counter- that must be identified and removed.
transferences? What provisions have you
made, if indicated, for your own supervi- A well-tuned bicycle wheel with its cus-
sion, consultation, and psychotherapy? Is tomary forty-two spokes provides an
your self-esteem as a psychotherapist apt metaphor. These spokes are needed
flagging? How do you visualize improve- to keep the rim from crumbling when it
ments? How do you maintain your focus meets any unusual impacts in the course
and emotional equanimity under such of its use. Well-adjusted spokes are re-
difficult circumstances? quired to keep the wheel “in true.”
When a wheel is “out of true,” it is easy
So, okay. Enough questions. Now it’s time to diagnose which spokes need what
for some answers. Well, at least a few sug- kind of attention. Pretty simple, actually.
gestions. After all, these comments are If only it was that easy for people who
meant to inform and support us. get out of adjustment, psychotherapists
included.
No one is immune from being human.
Let us take a deep breath, or two, and re- What “spokes” are in your wheel (life)?
member that our need, as well as that of Examples of spokes include work, love
our patients, is to learn to soothe our- relationships, religious or spiritual in-
selves. Such self-soothing may not be an volvement, philanthropy, playing a mu-
easy task in such trying times, but if we sical instrument, singing in a chorus,
don’t know how to do so, how can we making ceramics or rugs, painting,
expect to help our patients to do so? dance, chess, etc. Sublimations, in short.
None of us is in this alone. While sub- These involvements help absorb the
groups are the nucleus of cohesive shocks to which we are exposed.
groups, few psychotherapists during
today’s economic uncertainties would The spoke’s function is to absorb the
find it difficult to locate colleagues with shocks that the bicycle wheel may en-
whom to commiserate. counter on impact. Similarly, psy-
chotherapists must have enough
These may be especially important times well-adjusted “spokes” in their lives to
to be attentive to our use and possible be able to absorb the impacts to which
abuse of electronics. “Keeping it they are exposed. Not to do so courts
human” will always pay dividends in disaster when one becomes the victim of
our profession. Trust me on this! This is life ambushes.
also a time to pay special attention to the
contracts (agreements) that one has with Do you pay careful attention to your
one’s patients. It is also crucial to pay sleep, dietary, physical activity, and sex-
meticulous, scrupulous attention to ual regimens? Has your weight changed
one’s boundaries, both professional and recently? Are you careful to minimize
personal. It has always been necessary continued on page 57
56
#"$!%
any tendencies to act out, such as get the care we need for ourselves. We
overeating, overspending, abusing sex deserve and require it. High-quality care
or alcohol, or using drugs? Is your con- is what our patients expect and deserve.
centration and ability to focus acceptable Nothing less is acceptable. To offer this,
and at your typical level? Are your rela- we ourselves need to be balanced and
tionships with your friends and family centered. Our patients will be the bene-
adequate, nourishing, and as they usu- ficiaries.
ally have been? Are you spending time
in nature and involved in music and the This is a time to come together. There is
arts? Do you make time for reading? Are much to celebrate, even during times of
you finding excuses and rationalizations adversity, for those willing to look. This
for any of the above? Are you exploring is a time to congregate, in community,
your resistances to being balanced and a not a time to isolate and withdraw. It is
psychotherapist “in true”? a time for interaction, not inaction or
seclusion. There are ample reasons for
Well-trained psychotherapists treating optimism. We will survive, thrive, and
well-prepared, committed patients, es- even prevail. The only thing that is per-
pecially those psychotherapists who manent is change. If we are not here to
have managed to avoid, or at least min- treat patients in need, who will be?
imize, third-party involvement will al-
ways have much to offer that patients I hope that you, my colleagues, take
will need. There is no competition for a these suggestions to heart and make
skilled psychotherapist and a committed them yours. Our future, and that of our
patient in need. Fees can always be ad- patients, is bright. If you think I am
justed, and even some pro bono work wrong, what would you prefer to be-
can help everyone maintain continuity lieve? If the above hasn’t convinced you,
for a period of time. Resilience may be and you remain recalcitrant and incon-
more important than ever now. solable, please remember that you can
always contact me, and together we will
One of my patients who recently became make it through. Some of our suffering
a new mother has become involved with is optional.
what some parents do these days—
namely, “nanny search.” They seek a Dr. Hoffman is a clinical psychologist in pri-
nanny who will best provide for their vate practice, specializing in individual and
child’s wellbeing. We psychotherapists group psychotherapy, supervision, and con-
also need to provide for our wellbeing. sultation. His office is located at 111 North
What sense does it make to know what Wabash Avenue, Suite 2122, Chicago, Illi-
our patients need, and seek it for them, nois 60602. He can also be reached at 312-
but not to do so for ourselves? We must 332-1262 or violoncellist@live.com.
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
57
#"$!%
STUDENT FEATURE
Discerning Group Therapy Dynamics:
Five of Irvin Yalom’s Therapeutic Factors in
the Context of Wilfred Bion’s Group Conceptualizations
Phillip Causey
Pacifica Graduate Institute
In The Theory and that may be experienced as uncomfort-
Practice of Group Psy- able if exposed. Thus the group mental-
chotherapy, the existen- ity is often in contradiction to the group’s
tial psychotherapist conscious aims of growth and progress
Irvin Yalom (1995) de- and is in contradiction to the individuals
scribes 11 therapeutic that comprise it. In Bion’s words it is “the
or primary factors of failure to afford the individual a full life”
group therapy. These (Bion, 1959, p. 54). Group mentality is an
factors are “natural lines of cleavage” “anonymous collaboration” of group
that “divide the therapeutic experience” members, who contribute “selectively
(p. 1). Drawing from years of research unconscious elements,” as well as ex-
during and after World War II, the psy- pressing the “the unanimous but unspo-
choanalyst Wilfred Bion used Kleinian ken aims and beliefs of the group”
concepts to develop group therapy inno- (Bleandonu, 2000, p. 70).
vations (Bleandonu, 2000, p. 69). This
paper will explore 5 of Yalom’s 11 thera- Group culture is simply the function of
peutic factors in the context of Bion’s in- the conflict between the individual’s
novations (1959). needs or desires and the group mental-
ity. According to Bion, group emotional
Yalom’s therapeutic factors are discern- activity interacts between two levels.
ments of complex human experiences The first is the work group, which de-
occurring in groups. According to Yalom scribes only one aspect of group mental
change happens in groups as an “inter- activity. Work group occurs when all
play of human experience,” which is individuals in the group are in touch
synonymous with Yalom’s therapeutic with reality and can cooperate with each
factors (Yalom, 1995, p.1). The following other. It is marked by cohesiveness in
therapeutic factors will be examined: in- addressing group dynamics, working
stillation of hope, universality, impart- towards goals, attunement to one
ing information, altruism, and the another, and symbolic interactions. Con-
corrective recapitulation of the primary sequently, the work group is “character-
family group. ized by its awareness of the dimension
of time, and the need for progress”
Bion (1959) held that groups consisted of (Bleandonu, 2000, p. 71). A work group
and should be regarded as the interplay allows for individuals to be therapeuti-
of individual needs, group mentality, cally addressed, promoting therapeutic
and group culture (p. 55). Group mental- progress and growth. The second level is
ity can be thought of as the unknown in- the basic assumption group, which
fluences on the group, the unanimous avoids uncertainty or anything anxiety
expression of the will of the group (Bion, provoking as well as growth promoting.
1959, p. 59). It operates as a uniformity of Basic assumptions turn the group, un-
group members in that it allows individ-
uals to deny feelings, especially those continued on page 59
58
#"$!%
group, on the other hand, is more likely ever, the process of advice giving con-
to attune to a member’s sense of alone- veys “mutual interest and caring” (p.
ness and consequently to offer needed 11). Information can be of benefit early
support. in the therapeutic group’s meetings as
long as it influences the move into work
Yalom (1995) categorizes imparting in- group mentality. However, information
formation into direct advice and didactic can become a type of resistance if it
instruction. He warns the reader, “when serves to avoid anxiety during the work
therapists or patients retrospectively ex- group mentality.
amine their experience in interactional
groups therapy, they do not highly value The basic assumption group can be in-
didactic information or advice” (p. 8). terpreted as essentially defending
Thus imparting information must be against felt anxiety. Felt anxiety then
strategic; otherwise it could operate as a would be essential for the work group to
flight mechanisms or feed the patients’ progress. Using anxiety is crucial to not
dependence on the therapist as the only only see the group’s defense structures
worthy imparter of information. The in use as well as comment on their active
group could also perceive information presence, but more importantly to facil-
as a messiah. For example, group mem- itate work group mentality. For exam-
bers might believe that if they just hear ple, if the group is defending against
the right idea and/or concept all will be anxiety by talking about a football game
better. This optimism is out of touch or focusing on the facilitator, the facili-
with reality; if information is to be of tator might address the group as a
benefit it must anchor the group in real- whole, commenting on the superficiality
ity, not in theoretical ideas or irrelevant or diversion from doing work by focus-
facts. Bion (1959) commented on ad- ing on him/her, and subsequently al-
dressing the group as a whole, prefer- lowing the group members to
ring simplicity and precision when experience anxiety by provoking silence.
making interpretations, rather than Often members will begin to express
using terms such as “group culture” or feelings or offer feedback in order to re-
“mentality.” Bion focused on what was duce their anxiety produced by silence.
taking place in the group as well as of- Imparting information can be antitheti-
fered a degree of transparency in how he cal when it functions in two ways. First,
reached such interpretations. Accord- reason may promote rationalization and
ingly, interpretations are often aimed to intellectualization by possibly heighten-
frame group interactions, or if in work ing those defenses. Second, it might pre-
group mode the group’s and individ- clude one’s growing tolerance of and
ual’s dynamics (p. 60). If imparting in- navigation through anxiety produced by
formation takes the focus away from the uncertainty and irrationality, or stunt the
group or makes the group process more individuals and/or group development
abstract than concrete, it would be more of the higher level functioning, such as
likely a function of the basic assumption “negative capability, that is, when a man
mentality. is capable of being in uncertainties, mys-
teries, doubts, without any irritable
Yalom (1995) points out that didactic in- reaching after fact and reason.” (Keats &
struction can be an “initial binding force Scrubber,1899, p. 277).
in the group until other therapeutic fac-
tors become operative” (p. 10). Explicit According to Yalom (1970), altruism is
advice, according to Yalom (1995), has essential for healing in groups. It func-
little direct therapeutic value, as the con- tions in two ways. First, members tend
tent usually carries little weight, how- continued on page 61
60
#"$!%
to give by receiving in this way mem- both the basic assumption group men-
bers interact by offering support, in- tality and the work group mentality. In
sight, challenges to self-deception or the basic assumption mentalities, the fa-
distortions, how they are impacted, and milial conflicts might emerge but not be
suggestions. Second: attended to and/or perpetuated by ei-
a sense of life meaning ensues but ther freezing them “into rigid, impene-
cannot be deliberately, self-con- trable system that characterizes” their
sciously pursued: it is always a deriv- family structure or just not working
ative phenomenon that materializes through them. Ideally, work group will
when we have transcended our- be evident when those familial conflicts
selves, when we have forgotten our- are worked through correctively such
selves and become absorbed in that fixed roles are constantly “explored
someone (or something) outside and challenged, and ground rules for in-
ourselves. The therapy group im- vestigating relationships and testing
plicitly teaches its members that new behavior” is continually encour-
lesson and provides a new counter- aged (Yalom, 1995, p. 14). Thus work
solipsistic perspective. (Yalom, 1995, group entails working through unfin-
p. 13) ished business, whereas the basic as-
sumptions might be the reliving of the
Work group mentality requires both giv- conflicts by dependence on the parent,
ing, which translates into the cohesive- pairing off with a certain group (family)
ness of the group instilling focus such member (possibly illuminating an emo-
that a member who might need atten- tionally incestuous relationship), or flee-
tion receives it, and transcendence. By ing from or fighting something that
giving to others, a transcendent experi- might have been intolerable to the fam-
ence is possible for group members in ily system consciously or unconsciously.
which a life meaning ensues. In the basic assumption mentality, when
familial dynamics emerge they can be
Corrective recapitulation of the primary potentially useful for the work group
family group involves the recreation of mentality if their emergence elucidates
familial dynamics in the group. Psy- those very early familial conflicts, which
chotherapy groups resemble families in
is necessary for them to be worked
many ways, providing parental and au-
through. In other words, not until issues
thority figures, sibling competition and
are acted out or experienced by the
rivalry, potent emotions, and the com-
group can the group address them. So
plexity of intimate feelings from empa-
early familial conflict might be dis-
thy to hostility. Additionally a complex
played and identified in both basic as-
web of familial patterns and entangle-
sumptions mentalities and work group
ments become evident: dependence
mentality; the difference being the work
upon the leader, opposition to the
group mentality displays an attunement
leader, suspicion of the leader resulting
in the inciting of parental disagree- to those conflicts as well as corrective or
ments, seeking of attention even if it is growth promoting challenges and ex-
negative attention, selflessly attempting plorations of those conflicts.
to deny one’s own needs in order to ap-
pease the leader, and so on. Group ther- In the context of Wilfred Bion’s (1959)
apy allows for familial conflicts to arise, approach to and conceptualization of
whereas in individual therapy those group dynamics, 5 of Yalom’s 11 thera-
conflicts might not as readily and obvi- peutic factors theoretically function in
ously emerge (Yalom, 1995, p. 14). both the basic assumption group and
Early familial conflicts may be relived in continued on page 62
61
#"$!%
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
DUES REDUCTIONS
We know that the economic difficulties of the times have had impact on APA
members. In order to provide additional assistance for our members and those
who wish to become members of Division 29, we have created a new process
for requesting dues reductions related to economic hardships and retirement.
Please find the form online on our website at http://www.divisionofpsycho-
therapy.org/. All cases will be decided on an individual and confidential basis
by the President and Treasurer of the Division. Forms may be faxed to our
Central Office at (480) 854-8966 or sent via email to assnmgmt1@cox.net.
62
#"$!%
FEATURE
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and
Anusara Yoga: Parallel New Horizons
Tara Eastcott
University of Denver Graduate School of Professional Psychology
Yoga is increasingly humans’ capacity for language mires us
being considered as in inevitable suffering via our ability to
an adjunctive or even recall painful memories, imagine the
primary therapy for possibility of horrific future events, or
numerous physical and just replay negative thoughts about our-
psychological illnesses, selves. Some approaches to psycholog-
including ADHD ical treatment focus on altering or
(Jensen & Kenny, 2004); posttraumatic eliminating unwanted thoughts and
stress disorder (Wills, n.d.); and sub- feelings as the sole goal of treatment.
stance abuse (Shaffer, LaSalvia & Stein, Rather than attempting to alter the form,
1997). We have yet to determine which frequency or content of thoughts and
mental illnesses and/or populations feelings, ACT seeks to change our rela-
yoga may benefit, and how to ideally tionship to our private experiences
combine yoga with psychotherapy. (thoughts, feelings, physical sensations)
Studies examining yoga’s efficacy rarely through altering the social and verbal
specify the style of yoga being utilized; contexts in which they occur. ACT uses
and when they do, there is typically a combination of mindfulness, accept-
no theoretical justification for the pair- ance, commitment and behavioral
ing. I suggest that we should examine change interventions. Psychological
whether specific pairings of yoga styles health is measured according to one’s
with psychotherapeutic approaches that ability to accept the present moment and
are philosophically compatible may be take action towards one’s valued life di-
more beneficial than simply adding rections, rather than by one’s symptoms
yoga to therapy without this level of dis- or how we feel about ourselves.
crimination. Towards this end, I will
outline the similarities between Accept- Anusara Yoga is a developing style
ance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) founded in 1997 by John Friend.
and Anusara yoga, and discuss how “Anusara” means “flowing with Grace”;
pairing them may provide more benefit “flowing with Nature”; or “following
than either can offer alone. your heart.” The Hatha yoga founda-
tion means that poses or asanas are per-
ACT and Anusara formed in accordance with precise
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy biomechanical principles of alignment
(ACT) is a developing form of psycho- and are coupled with a Tantric philoso-
logical intervention that emerged in the phy. The three principles of Tantric phi-
late 1990’s and recognizes itself as one of losophy most prominent in Anusara are:
the third wave of behavioral therapies.
ACT is steeped in classical behavioral 1) belief in the universe as a concrete
analysis, with the addition of Relational manifestation of the divine, which is
Frame Theory (RFT), a psychological ultimately good
model that explains how human cogni- 2) connecting with the divine to foster
tion and language impact human behav- greater freedom and creativity for
ior and experience. ACT suggests that continued on page 64
63
#"$!%
64
#"$!%
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
NOTICE TO READERS
67
#"$!%
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
69
#"$!%
Some members have raised concerns Hyatt management, there is no labor dis-
about APA’s planned use of the Man- pute at the hotel and there are no picket
chester Hyatt as a headquarters hotel lines. APA staff has confirmed that there
during the 2010 San Diego convention. were no picket lines at the hotel during
The purpose of this memo is to let mem- two recent visits to the property. Unite
bers know that we are aware of two Here has been unsuccessful in its efforts
areas of concern: the possibility of labor to unionize the hotel’s employees. There
issues at the hotel—apparently un- are occasional demonstrators from the
founded based on our research—and the Unite Here union; these demonstrations
hotel owner Doug Manchester’s politi- do not involve Hyatt employees as best
cal activities in support of Proposition 8. we can tell. It is also important to note
that there is no evidence that there has
Please see below for new information in been any wrongdoing on the part of the
response to a communication from hotel or its management vis-à-vis the
Unite Here, a labor union, about the treatment of its employees. The Man-
Manchester Hyatt. A number of ques- chester Hyatt Hotel provided APA a
tions that arose when the union con- statement that it “warrants and repre-
tacted some of the APA Divisions have sents that it has had no unfair labor prac-
been forwarded to us via numerous list tice charge or complaint pending or
servs. In an effort to ensure that all threatened against it. The hotel has fur-
members have access to the same infor- ther stated in writing that the hotel has
mation we are responding to the ques- “never received any notification from the
tions we’ve received to date via this National Labor Relations Board about
memo. As more information becomes any group of associates within the hotel
available we will continue to share it. or within any department of the hotel,
who have expressed an interest in organ-
In a second section of this memo we are
izing and there is not currently and has
also providing information about Mr.
never been an organized labor election
Manchester’s political activities and
campaign underway.”
how we plan to respond to them. This
information was first shared with nu- Q: Unite Here has claimed that the
merous list servs last week but we in- housekeepers at the Manchester Hyatt
clude it again for the benefit of those are forced by management to clean
members who did not see it. more rooms than housekeepers at other
Hyatt hotels and that they were hold-
Questions and concerns about ing lunch hour protests. Is this true?
allegations being made by Unite Here. The Hyatt Corporation says this is a
Q. Are there picket lines at the Man- distortion of the facts. The Manchester
chester Grand Hyatt? What is the na- Hyatt participates in a corporate program
ture of the labor dispute? that assigns “credits” to rooms depend-
The Manchester Grand Hyatt is a non- ing on whether the guest is staying over
union hotel. According to Manchester continued on page 71
70
#"$!%
ington, New Jersey, New York (three no bottom-line effect on the Hyatt (the
times), Maryland, Connecticut, Iowa, hotel would still get its money), the Board
and California. In California, the APA opted to meet its contractual obligations
brief was cited by the state Supreme but also use the San Diego meeting as an
Court when it ruled that same-sex mar- opportunity to communicate APA policy
riage was legal in May 2008. positions on LGBT rights generally and
same-sex marriage specifically to both a
While we strongly disagree with Mr. California and national audience. Ideas
Manchester’s position vis-à-vis proposi- for how we will do this are outlined in a
tion 8, our decision to abide by our con- subsequent section below.
tract with the Hyatt is based on our
belief that the large expense of failing to Additionally, the Global Hyatt Corpora-
abide by the contract would be more tion has a long history of supporting di-
productively spent on funding for APA versity and has enjoyed a good standing
activities in support of psychology and with the LGBT community. The Human
the application of psychology to help Rights Campaign, the largest U.S. LGBT
disadvantaged groups including the advocacy organization, has named the
LGBT community. We see the San Diego Hyatt Corporation one of its “Best
convention as an important opportunity Places to Work” every year since 2003;
to call attention to the social science re- Diversity Inc. and the Advocate maga-
search on sexual orientation, the abilities zine have named Hyatt among the top
of gay and lesbian parents, and the ben- companies for LGBT employees.
efits of marriage for all people.
At the same time, Board members are
Q. Given APA’s position supporting sensitive to the impact of this issue on
equal marriage for LGBT people, why LGBT and other members, and have
is the association still planning to use heard the concern expressed about the
this hotel? Manchester Hyatt being a headquarters
APA signed a contract with the Man- hotel during the 2010 APA convention.
chester Hyatt in 2004 in order to reserve If individual members choose not to stay
both sleeping and meeting rooms for the at the Hyatt there will be other lodging
2010 convention. It is typical that such options available to them.
agreements contain substantial penalties
for cancellations; such penalties protect Q. Why can’t APA cancel its contract
both the host organization (APA) and with the Manchester Hyatt and use an-
the hotel, and are standard in the indus- other property? Haven’t other organi-
try. The APA Board of Directors decided zations canceled plans to meet there?
in February, when it was informed by The Manchester Hyatt has indicated to
Unite Here of the boycott efforts, that APA that it would enforce the terms of
APA would have to honor its contract the contract were APA to cancel. Those
with the Manchester for two reasons: terms involve a penalty of more than $1
million if we were to cancel now. That
The official Board policy is not to cancel amount escalates closer to the conven-
hotel contracts unless there is imminent tion dates. Some organizations have re-
danger to attendees or staff; and in a portedly canceled plans to meet at the
time of serious financial crisis, cancella- Hyatt. Those organizations may have
tion of the contract would cost APA had different contract provisions than
more than $1 million due to its contrac- contained in the APA/Hyatt agreement.
tual obligations. Other organizations, including the
Rather than take an action that would be National Education Association, the
prohibitively expensive to APA and have continued on page 73
72
#"$!%
American Public Health Association, the individual members may choose not to
American Historical Association and the stay in the property. We respect that per-
California Association for Health Serv- sonal choice.
ices at Home, held meetings at the prop-
erty despite the call for a boycott. Like Q. What will APA do to call attention
APA, these organizations are supportive to the science related to same-sex
of LGBT rights and workers’ rights. marriage?
The convention provides an unprece-
Q. What about members or divisions of dented opportunity to bring the weight
APA who refuse to meet in the Man- of scientific research to the public debate
chester at the convention? What is your about same-sex marriage. APA has sup-
message to them? ported legal benefits for same-sex cou-
Initially, some groups within APA moved ples since 1997 and civil marriage for
to support a boycott of the hotel to same-sex couples since 2004.
protest Mr. Manchester’s support of
Proposition 8. APA believes that in the APA’s President-elect Carol Goodheart,
end, a boycott, although a strong sym- EdD, has appointed a governance and
bolic gesture, would not achieve the de- staff work group to assist in developing
sired results; the Manchester Hyatt Hotel a positive approach to the opportunity
would receive the same revenue— presented by the Convention. As a start-
whether the rooms are used by our mem- ing point, the work group has devel-
bers or not—because of major contractual oped the following plans, which have
penalties that APA would have to bear if been approved by the Board of Direc-
we cannot fill our room block. Further- tors. Additional ideas for potential pub-
more, if too many groups asked to move lic education activities are welcome.
out of the Hyatt, there would not be
enough space to house them in other ho- • A press conference with speakers
tels near the Convention Center. All and briefing papers focusing on the
meeting space in the near-by Marriott latest, best science around sexual
and Hilton hotels is already reserved. orientation and the mental health
There are some large rooms available in benefits of marriage;
the convention center but very few rooms • A plenary program focused on
that would work well for a small group, same-sex marriage and the diverse
i.e. a division meeting. Other hotel space, public debate going on in our na-
if available at all, would likely be a sig- tion about it;
nificant distance from the Convention
Center and would require payment for • A presidential citation to a leader in
meeting rooms. (Divisions normally get the movement for same-sex mar-
meeting space at the headquarters hotel riage;
at no charge because of our sizable room • Informational packets on APA poli-
block at the hotel). cies on sexual orientation and mar-
riage rights issues for attendees and
For all of the above reasons, APA has
the public.
asked groups not to formally boycott the
hotel. Instead, we are asking APA divi- In summary, the goals of the Board of
sions and other entities to focus on pos- Directors and the work group are to give
itive actions to highlight APA’s policies our members full information, respect
and to educate the public on the science the personal choices of convention atten-
related to same-sex marriage. At the dees, publicize the social science re-
same time, we recognize there is no sin- search on sexual orientation, and
gle point of view and understand that demonstrate fiscal responsibility.
73
#"$!%
REFERENCES
The Mandatory Reporting of Sus- Giles-Sims, J., Straus, M., & Sugarman,
pected Child Abuse and Neglect: D. (1995, April). Child, maternal, and
Ethical Obligations, Dilemmas, and family characteristics associated with
Concerns spanking. Family Relations, 44(2), 170-
Alvarez, K. M., Donohue, B., Kenny, M. 176.
C , Cavanagh, N., & Romero, V. (2005). Herrenkohl, E. C, Herrenkohl, R. C,
The process and consequences of re- Egolf, B, P., & Russo, M. J, (1998).
porting child maltreatment: A brief The relationship between early mal-
overview for professionals in the treatment and teenage parenthood.
mental health field. Aggression & Journal of Adolescence, 2, 291-303.
Violent Behavior, 10(3), 311-331. Klass, P. (2009). The marks of childhood
Banks, D., Landsverk, J., & Wang, K. or the marks of abuse? New York
(2008, July). Changing policy and Times, May 12, D5. Available at:
practice in the child welfare system http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/
through collaborative efforts to 12/health/12klas.html.
identify and respond effectively to Lewit, E. M. (1994). Reported child
family violence. Journal of Interper- abuse and neglect. Future of Children,
sonal Violence, 23(7), 903-932. 4(2). 233-242.
Benbenishty, R., & Chen, W. (2003). De- Mathews, B., & Kenny, M. (2008).
cision making by the child protection Mandatory reporting legislation in
team of a medical center. Health & the United States, Canada, and Aus-
Social Work, 28(4), 284-292. tralia: A cross-jurisdictional review of
Brosig, C, & Kalichman, S. (1992). key features, differences, and issues.
Child abuse reporting decisions: Child Maltreatment, 13(1), 50-63.
Effects of statutory wording of Moran, P. B., Vuchinich, S., & Hall, N.
reporting requirements. Professional K: (2004). Associations between
Psychology: Research and Practice, types of maltreatment and substance
25(6), 486-492. use during adolescence. Child Abuse
Eckenrode, J., Laird, M., & Doris, J. & Neglect, 28(5), 565-574.
(1993). School performance and dis- Ryan, J. P., & Testa, M. F. (2005). Child
ciplinary problems among abused maltreatment and juvenile delin-
and neglected children. Developmen- quency: Investigatingthe role of
tal Psychology, 29, 53-62, placement and placement instability.
Egu, C, L., & Weiss, D, J, (2003), The Children & Youth Services Review,
role of race and severity of abuse in 27(3). 227-249.
teachers’ recognition or reporting of Stemberg, K. (1993). Child maltreat-
child abuse. Journal of Child & Family ment: Implications for policy from
Studies, 12(4), 465-474. cross-cultural research. In D. Cichette
Gilbert, R., Widom, C., Browne, K., & S. Roth (Eds.), Child abuse, child de-
Fergusson, D., Webb, E., & Janson, S. velopment, and social policy (pp. 192-
(2009a). Burden and consequences 212). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
of child maltreatment in high-income Publishers.
countries. Lancet, 373(9657), 68-81. Smith, S.K. (2008). Mandatory report-
Gilbert, R., Kemp, A., Thoburn, J., ing of child abuse and neglect. Ac-
Sidebotham, P., Radford, L., Glaser, cessed June 18, 2009. Available at:
D., et al. (2009b). Recognising and http://www.smith-lawfirm.com/
responding to child maltreatment. mandatory_reporting.htm.
Lancet, 373(9658), 167-180. Straus, M.A. (2007). Conflict Tactics
77
#"$!%
78
#"$!%
79
#"$!%
80
#"$!%
81
#"$!%
82
#"$!%
PSYCHOTHERAPY BULLETIN
Email: stileswb@muohio.edu
Psychotherapy Bulletin is the official newsletter of Division 29 (Psychotherapy) of the American Psychological
Association. Published four times each year (spring, summer, fall, winter), Psychotherapy Bulletin is designed
to: 1) inform the membership of Division 29 about relevant events, awards, and professional opportunities;
2) provide articles and commentary regarding the range of issues that are of interest to psychotherapy the-
orists, researchers, practitioners, and trainers; 3) establish a forum for students and new members to offer
their contributions; and, 4) facilitate opportunities for dialogue and collaboration among the diverse mem-
bers of our association.
Contributors are invited to send articles (up to 2,250 words), interviews, commentaries, letters to the
editor, and announcements to Jenny Cornish, PhD, Editor, Psychotherapy Bulletin. Please note that Psy-
chotherapy Bulletin does not publish book reviews (these are published in Psychotherapy, the official journal
of Division 29). All submissions for Psychotherapy Bulletin should be sent electronically to jcornish@du.edu
with the subject header line Psychotherapy Bulletin; please ensure that articles conform to APA style. Dead-
lines for submission are as follows: February 1 (#1); May 1 (#2); July 1 (#3); November 1 (#4). Past issues
of Psychotherapy Bulletin may be viewed at our website: www.divisionofpsychotherapy.org. Other inquiries
regarding Psychotherapy Bulletin (e.g., advertising) or Division 29 should be directed to Tracey Martin at
the Division 29 Central Office (assnmgmt1@cox.net or 602-363-9211).
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C www.divisionofpsychotherapy.org
#"$!%
N O F P S Y C H O THE
O
RA P Y
D I V I SI
29
ASSN.
AMER I
AL
C
A
N PSYCHOLOGI C
DIVISION OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
American Psychological Association
6557 E. Riverdale
Mesa, AZ 85215
www.divisionofpsychotherapy.org