Past Conditions of The First Bailout of Greece

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Past conditions of the first bailout of Greece

In 2010, IMF and European Union initiated a bailout package of EUR 110 bn to prevent fallout of
Greek economy !"i# $a# follo$ed by #imilar bailout to Ireland and %ortugal economie# a# $ell
It $a# being believed t"at bailout package# $ill "elp re#tore t"e#e economie# &e $ill begin
analy'ing t"e bailout of Greece In May(2010 IMF and EU propo#ed a bailout plan for Greece
$ort" EUR 110 bn )U*+ 1,- bn. /ut of 110 bn, IMF $ould pay 0111 of t"e fund# implying EUR
00 bn and EU $ould pay remaining 2111 of t"e amount implying EUR 20 bn IMF lent to Greece
under it# *tand(3y 4rrangement# )*34. program allo$# t"e Fund to re#pond 5uickly to
countrie#6 e7ternal financing need# IMF u#ually lend# upto 2008 of 5uota for 12 mont" period
and 9008 of 5uota for total credit out#tanding Greece6# 5uota i# 11 bn *+R and IMF bailout to
Greece $a# around *+R 29, billion )EUR 00 bn. !"i# implied IMF bailout amounted to 02128
of Greece6# 5uota !"e program $a# e7ceptionally large by all mean#
!"e bailout i# ba#ed on certain condition# under $"ic" Greece $ill "ave to improve it# public
finance# and competivene## !"e government6# program al#o include# pro(gro$t" policie# to
reform #uc" crucial #ector# a# ta7 admini#tration, t"e labor market, t"e "ealt" #ector, and t"e
management of public finance# !"e bailout fund# are relea#ed every 5uarter ba#ed on an
a##e##ment report of t"e progre## on Greece economy and $"et"er re#tructuring plan i# on
e7pected line#
In 2010, Greece got EUR 31.5 bn, lesser than the proposed EUR 38 bn. The shortfall
of EUR 6.5 bn has been added to 2011. o o!erall the total ba"lo#t to Greece
re$a"ns sa$e at EUR 110 bn.
In %a&'2010, total borro("ng needs of go!ern$ent for 2010 (as pro)ected at EUR
*3.6 bn. Th"s (as re!"sed lo(er to EUR 55.1 bn "n +ec'10 re!"e( and f#rther re!"sed
#p(ards to EUR 60.1 bn. The r"se (as $a"nl& on acco#nt of Greece $"ss"ng "ts
re!en#e targets. The f"scal def"c"t target (as $"ssed as (ell. ,o(e!er beca#se of
the o!erall decl"ne fro$ %a&'10 est"$ates,
-"nanc"ng gap (as lo(er at EUR 31.5 bn co$pared to pro)ected gap of EUR 38 bn.
How and why it failed?
The refor$s d"d not go as per des"red pace ("th refor$ fat"g#e sett"ng "n !er& earl&
stage. .hat "s (orse "s that th"s sl"ppage fro$ refor$ co$$"t$ent (ent #nnot"ced
for a (h"le and Gree/ debt cr"s"s has aga"n beco$e a $a)or "ss#e. The bas"c
cond"t"ons of E%U entr& spec"f"ed b& tab"l"t& and Gro(th pact ".e. b#dget def"c"t
sho#ld be 30 of G+1 and Gross +ebt sho#ld be 600 of G+1 are not e2pected to be
$et e!en t"ll 2013. 4#dget def"c"t $"ght st"ll co$e lo(er b#t gross debt le!els are
e2pected to re$a"n abo!e 600 of G+1 for a $#ch longer t"$e.
Greece 3ailout +i#tribution )in bn Euro#.
2010 2010 4ctual
IMF 10, 10,
EU 2:9 211
!otal 02 01-
The plan $a/ers had ass#$ed Greece (o#ld be able to borro( fro$ "nternat"onal
$ar/ets b#t th"s has not been poss"ble beca#se of lo( go!ern$ent co$$"t$ent to
p#sh refor$s. Th"s has led to sp"ral"ng bond &"elds $a/"ng borro("ng #n!"able. Th"s
has led to aga"n an #ncerta"nt& "n global $ar/ets and o!er E#ro prospects. The
cred"t rat"ng agenc"es ha!e f#rther lo(ered Greece debt stat#s to near
spec#lat"!e5)#n/ categor& f#el"ng f#rther concerns.
6nother proble$ ("th Greece has been "ts #nderreport"ng of def"c"t and debt data.
Greece off"c"als ha!e al(a&s #nderreported the act#al f"g#res. 6n& act"on #nder
tab"l"t& and Gro(th 1act (or/s on f"rst t"$e reported data and "s not appl"cable to
re!"sed data. Th"s #nderreport"ng has been done desp"te $an& concerns fro$
E#ropean 7o$$"ss"on o!er the sa$e.
E#ropean 4an/s connected to Greece debt. 4an/s "n -rance and Ger$an& hold a
large percentage of Gree/ debt. 8!erall, the "nternat"onal ban/ hold"ngs of Gree/
debt ha!e hal!ed fro$ nearl& EUR 300 bn "n 93 20: to 135.8 bn "n 93 2010. %ost
co#ntr"es ha!e lo(ered the"r Greece e2pos#re co$pared to 93 200:. Th"s "nd"cates
$ost reg"ons do not ha!e conf"dence "n Greece econo$&. Tho#gh, "t "s s#rpr"s"ng to
see U; ban/s "ncreas"ng the"r e2pos#re to Greece debt. It see$s U; ban/s are $ore
conf"dent of Gree/ debt le!els co$pared to other econo$"es. +esp"te decl"ne "n
absol#te le!els, share of -rance and Ger$an& "n Greece debt has "ncreased fro$
310 "n 93 200: to nearl& 620 "n 93 2010. Th"s "$pl"es Greece and -rance ha!e
b"gger sta/es "n Greece debt relat"!e to other econo$"es. ("t<erland ban/s ha!e
c#t the"r Greece e2pos#re re$ar/abl& fro$ EUR *8.6 bn "n 93 200: to )#st EUR 2.:
bn "n 93 2010. E!en U ban/s ha!e an e2pos#re to Gree/ debt $a/"ng "t a ("del&
"nter'connected ban/"ng proble$.
=at"onal 7entral 4an/s connected to Greece debt. =at"onal central ban/s of E%U
econo$"es ha!e been lend"ng to ban/s "n tro#bled econo$"es "nd"rectl&.
In E%U econo$"es, each nat"onal central ban/ >=74? deals ("th "ts ban/s accord"ng
to r#les ad$"n"stered b& the E#ropean 7entral 4an/ >E74?. Under th"s s&ste$ sa& a
reta"l depos"t "s $o!ed fro$ a Gree/ 4an/ to a Ger$an ban/. In case, the Ger$an
ban/ "s #n("ll"ng to accept pa&$ent "n the for$ of a cla"$ on Gree/ 4an/, the debt
"s settled !"a 7entral 4an/s. o, the Ger$an 4an/ no( gets "ts cla"$ fro$
4#ndesban/ and 4#ndesban/ "n t#rn ac@#"res a cla"$ on
7entral ban/ of Greece.
Too $an& EU bod"es res#lt"ng "n poor co$$#n"cat"ons. The nat#re of the Un"on has
led to $an& /"nds of EU bod"es ("th $#lt"ple heads. It "s a proble$ "n nor$al t"$es
and "n cr"s"s "s )#st gets (orse. A"/e (e sa( "n 2010, there are $an& parallel
$essages fro$ d"fferent bod"es. Then there are heads of nat"onal bod"es as (ell
lead"ng to co$plete chaos and conf#s"on o!er poss"ble pol"c& cho"ces. The nat#re of
the #n"on "s s#ch that one cannot reall& accord respons"b"l"t"es for co$$#n"cat"ng to
a fe( chosen agenc"es.
Beffre& -ran/el of ,ar!ard Un"!ers"t& sa&s E%U pol"c&$a/ers $ade three $"sta/esC
' To ad$"t Greece "n the f"rst place.
' To allo( "nterest rate spreads on so!ere"gn bonds "ss#ed b& Greece.
' -a"l#re to send Greece to the I%- earl& "n the cr"s"s, before Gree/ "nterest
rate spreads ("dened sharpl&.
The f"rst and th"rd are $"sta/es of E%U pol"c&$a/ers and second "s a $"sta/e of
$ar/et part"c"pants. 6s both $ar/ets and pol"c&$a/ers erred #nderstand"ng the
"$pl"cat"ons of E%U, both need to resol!e th"s together.
Current scenario of the Bailout of Greece
In %a&'2010, total borro("ng needs of go!ern$ent for 2010 (as pro)ected at EUR
*3.6 bn. Th"s (as re!"sed lo(er to EUR 55.1 bn "n +ec'10 re!"e( and f#rther re!"sed
#p(ards to EUR 60.1 bn. The r"se (as $a"nl& on acco#nt of Greece $"ss"ng "ts
re!en#e targets. The f"scal def"c"t target (as $"ssed as (ell. ,o(e!er beca#se of
the o!erall decl"ne fro$ %a&'10 est"$ates, f"nanc"ng gap (as lo(er at EUR 31.5 bn
co$pared to pro)ected gap of EUR 38 bn.
Greece -"nanc"ng Gap >"n 4"ll"ons of E#ros?
2010 2011
%a& 10 +ec 10 %ar 11 %a& 10 +ec 10 %ar 11
1. Gross
4orro("ng
needed
*3.6 55.1 60 55.1 58.1 58.*
4#dget +ef"c"ts 20.* 22.3 22 18.* 16.8 1*
2. Gross
-"nanc"ng
Reso#rces
35.6 23.6 28.5 15.1 11.6 12.2
1r"!at"<at"on
Rece"pts
0 0 0 1 1 2.5
%ar/et
4orro("ngs
33.3 18.3 16.2 12.3 10.6 11
3. Total Gap 38 31.5 31.5 30 36.5 36.5
>1'2?
EU 2*.6 21.1 21.1 2:.1 35.6 35.6
I%- 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.: 10.: 10.:
4#dget +ef"c"t >0
of G+1?
'8.1 ':.6 ':.6 '*.6 '*.3 '*.5

,o(e!er, the ga"n of EUR 6.5 bn "n f"nances re@#"red "n 2010 has been carr"ed
for(ard to 2011. In 2011, EU (o#ld pa& EUR 35.6 bn to Greece co$pared to EUR
2:.1 bn pro)ect"ons "n %a&'10. Th"s "s beca#se "n 2011 re@#"red borro("ng has been
re!"sed #p(ards and f"nanc"ng so#rces ha!e been re!"sed lo(er. I%- "n "ts %ar'11
re!"e( ra"ses concerns o!er th"s proble$ of #nderach"e!e$ent of re!en#e targets.
%ar/ets are alread& concerned that f"nanc"ng gap "s l"/el& to be h"gher as f"scal
consol"dat"on plans are not go"ng on e2pected l"nes.
2012 ; 2010 in bot" t"e#e year#, borro$ing need# "ave been rai#ed along $it" financing
re#ource# <o$ever, t"ere i# a likeli"ood t"at government mi##e# it# revenue target# in 2012
and 2010 a# $ell leading to need for more finance# !"i# i# leading to furt"er #pike# in intere#t
rate# #een above
8!erall, the e2pectat"ons ha!e aga"n set "n that Greece (o#ld need $ore $one&
than the proposed EUR 110 bn. GreeceDs f"scal balances ha!e entered a !"c"o#s
c&cle and a self'f#lf"ll"ng cr"s"s. -"rst, go!ern$ent f"scal consol"dat"on plans are not
dee$ed as cred"ble. econd, $ar/ets start charg"ng a h"gher &"eld to f"nance the
borro("ng progra$. Th"rd, the h"gher costs of borro("ng, $a/es the progra$ $ore
e2pens"!e lead"ng to a cr"s"s e!en earl"er than pro)ected.
What measures are being taken to realize the amount provided to Greece?
Greece "s h"ghl& "ndebted and lost abo#t 25 percent of "ts co$pet"t"!eness s"nce
E#ro adopt"on. 6t the end of 200:, the general p#bl"c def"c"t reached 13.6 percent
of G+1 and p#bl"c debt had "ncreased to 115 percent of G+1. E!en ("th the lo(er
def"c"ts en!"saged #nder the progra$, the debt as share of G+1 ("ll cont"n#e to
pea/ at al$ost 150 percent of G+1 "n 2013 before decl"n"ng thereafter.
In past &ears, GreeceDs p#bl"c sector spend"ng gre(, (h"le re!en#e fell. Then the
global recess"on h"t and econo$"c act"!"t& slo(ed and #ne$plo&$ent rose. Th"s
e2acerbated the f"scal s"t#at"on.
-"nanc"ng costs for Greece rose rap"dl&, add"ng to the alread& h"gh debt b#rden. To
stop these sno(ball"ng d&na$"cs, the Gree/ go!ern$ent real"<ed that a strong
econo$"c progra$ (as the onl& !"able opt"on. These factors $eas#re the a$o#nt to
be pro!"ded to Greece.
What are the conditions set by E?
!"e bailout i# ba#ed on certain condition# under $"ic" Greece $ill "ave to improve it# public
finance# and competivene## !"e government6# program al#o include# pro(gro$t" policie# to
reform #uc" crucial #ector# a# ta7 admini#tration, t"e labor market, t"e "ealt" #ector, and t"e
management of public finance#
What theories of Trade are being incorporated?
What are the advantages!disadvantages of the Bailout?
4dvantage# of bailout program#
!"i# met"od not only reduce# your credit card bill# but reduce# t"em legitimately !"ere are no
illegitimate factor# attac"ed $it" t"e debt #ettlement procedure
=ou can forget about t"e #um t"at "a# been reduced !"e credit card company can never claim
t"e era#ed #um of money from you
Government debt elimination doe# not re#ult in minor di#count# !"e#e are ma>or reduction#
Mo#t loan taker# reduce t"eir due# by "alf or even more
=ou can find t"e be#t #ettlement organi'ation# to repre#ent you !"e#e firm# do t"e nece##ary
paper$ork and communicate $it" t"e credit card organi'ation
+"sad!antages of ba"lo#t progra$s
*ome di#advantage# of government debt bailout plan# are apparent $"ile mo#t of t"em are
"idden For in#tance, illegitimacy i# a common i##ue &e often #ee debtor# complaining about
it It i# not a $i#e move to tru#t any company =ou cannot believe blindly on $"at you are being
told <ence finding a legal organi'ation i# a toug" a#k
4not"er di#advantage i# t"e lack of commitment Mo#t relief firm# do not fulfill t"e promi#e#
$"ic" are made $"en a deal i# about to be #igned !"eir attitude c"ange# $"en t"e cu#tomer
#tart# paying t"em !"i# doe# not mean t"at legal firm# do not e7i#t *ome companie# "ave
been performing $ell for a long period of time !"e#e companie# are li#ted $it" !4*? )!"e
4##ociation of *ettlement ?ompanie#.
E7aggeration i# yet anot"er problem ?ompanie# providing "elp t"roug" government debt
elimination are not trut"ful !"ey trap t"e client# by providing e7aggerated information =ou can
avoid t"i# problem by confirming all t"e information In t"i# $ay, you $ill kno$ about t"e actual
#tatu# of t"e firm
Getting out of debt t"roug" a debt #ettlement proce## i# currently very popular but you need to
kno$ $"ere to locate t"e be#t performing program# in order to get t"e be#t deal# !o compare
debt #ettlement companie# it $ould be $i#e to vi#it a free debt relief net$ork $"ic" $ill locate
t"e be#t performing companie# in your area for free
Assess whether the relationship between member countries would hampered if the
bailout was cancelled.
.e see ban/s "n other reg"ons connected to Greece debt >and other tro#bled
econo$"es as (ell?. 4an/s "n -rance and Ger$an& hold a large percentage of Gree/
debt. Table loo/s at the "nternat"onal ban/ hold"ngs of Gree/ debt.
Intra(euro #y#tem debt ari#ing from cro##(
border tran#action# )+ec(10, in EUR bn.

Ger$an& 325.5 Ireland 136.1
A#2e$bo#
rg
68 Greece 8*.1
@et"erland# 30.5 1ort#gal 5:.:
-"nland 1:.* pa"n 50.:
Ital& 3.* -rance 28.3
8thers 82.3
Total 35*.1 Total 35*.1
Th"s "nter'connected s&ste$ of go!ern$ent def"c"ts ("th "nternat"onal ban/s and
nat"onal central ban/s "n E%U ha!e $ade the "ss#e e!en $ore co$ple2. The
proble$ "s not l"$"ted to E#ro <one ban/s alone and e2tends to U; and U ban/s as
(ell. These co$ple2 sets of transact"ons ha!e $ade ba"lo#t of these three
econo$"es "ne!"table.
"o you agree with the bailout? "o you think Greece will be able to repay the #oan?
."th a b#dget def"c"t of 13.6 percent, a debt'to'G+1 rat"o of 120 percent, o!er 10
percent #ne$plo&$ent, and one of E#ropeDs (ea/est and $ost corr#pt econo$"es,
the Gree/ econo$& "s certa"nl& "n cr"s"s. 6 ba"lo#t, ho(e!er, "s not the ans(er to th"s
Gree/ traged&. ,ere are f"!e reasons (h&.
Reason E1C 6 4a"lo#t ."ll =ot .or/
In order for a ba"lo#t to be s#ccessf#l, 6thens needs to al"gn the nat"onal (age
str#ct#re ("th "ts prod#ct"!"t&. That $eans "$ple$ent"ng str#ct#ral refor$s,
"ncl#d"ng root'and'branch refor$ of "ts labor $ar/et, ta2 s&ste$, h"gher ed#cat"on,
and pens"ons s&ste$. The& ("ll ha!e to be as far reach"ng as the refor$s
"$ple$ented b& the 1:80s Thatcher Go!ern$ent "n the U.;. and the Aange
Go!ern$ent "n =e( Fealand "n 1:83.
,o(e!er, "n an econo$& do$"nated b& the trade #n"ons, "t re$a"ns #ncerta"n
(hether 1r"$e %"n"ster Georg"os 1apandreo#Ds go!ern$ent can effect"!el&
"$ple$ent s#ch refor$s, (h"ch a"$ to c#t the b#dget def"c"t b& o!er 10 percentage
po"nts b& 2012. 1re!"o#s Gree/ go!ern$ents ha!e pledged refor$ b#t cons"stentl&
fa"led to garner the p#bl"c or pol"t"cal s#pport necessar& to see the$ thro#gh.
Reason E2C 6 4a"lo#t Is Illegal Under EU Treat& Aa(
6rt"cle 125.1 of the Treat& on the -#nct"on"ng of the E#ropean Un"on e2pressl&
forb"ds one $e$ber state ba"l"ng o#t another. It statesC
The Un"on shall not be l"able for or ass#$e the co$$"t$ents of central
go!ern$ents, reg"onal, local or other p#bl"c a#thor"t"es, other bod"es go!erned b&
p#bl"c la(, or p#bl"c #nderta/"ngs of an& %e$ber tate, ("tho#t pre)#d"ce to $#t#al
f"nanc"al g#arantees for the )o"nt e2ec#t"on of a spec"f"c pro)ect. 6 %e$ber tate
shall not be l"able for or ass#$e the co$$"t$ents of central go!ern$ents, reg"onal,
local or other p#bl"c a#thor"t"es, other bod"es go!erned b& p#bl"c la(, or p#bl"c
#nderta/"ngs of another %e$ber tate, ("tho#t pre)#d"ce to $#t#al f"nanc"al
g#arantees for the )o"nt e2ec#t"on of a spec"f"c pro)ect.
Aord Aa$ont, ecretar& of the Treas#r& (hen 4r"ta"n "ll'fatedl& )o"ned the E#ropean
E2change Rate %echan"s$ "n 1::0, po"nted o#t that the %aastr"cht Treat&
spec"f"call& r#led o#t s#ch ba"lo#ts so that respons"ble $e$bers of the E#ro<one
(o#ld not ha!e to s#bs"d"<e "rrespons"ble ones. -o#r Ger$an professors, "ncl#d"ng
."lhel$ =oell"ng, the for$er go!ernor of the 4#ndesban/, are prepar"ng to
challenge the resc#e pac/age "n Ger$an&Ds const"t#t"onal co#rt once "t has passed
thro#gh 1arl"a$ent.

Reason E3C 6 4a"lo#t Is Unpop#lar
It "s not d"ff"c#lt to see (h& Ger$ans and other E#ro<one p#bl"cs are opposed to
ba"l"ng o#t the profl"gate Gree/ go!ern$ent. ,a!"ng "ntrod#ced a const"t#t"onal
re@#"re$ent to balance "ts b#dget, the Ger$an go!ern$ent "s no( as/"ng the
p#bl"c to forego ta2 c#ts "n fa!or of "ts less respons"ble %ed"terranean ne"ghbor. 6
poll b& 4r"t"sh th"n/ tan/ 8pen E#rope "n B#ne 200: fo#nd that *0 percent of
Ger$an !oters (ere opposed to ba"l"ng o#t other E#ro<one co#ntr"es "n f"nanc"al
tro#ble.
Greece "s alread& one of the E#ropean Un"onDs largest rec"p"ents of s#bs"d"es "n the
for$ of str#ct#ral f#nds. In the e&es of $an& Ger$an ta2pa&ers, (ho also
#nder(r"te the largest net contr"b#t"on to the E#ropean Un"on, "t "s #nde$ocrat"c to
transfer !ast s(athes of the"r $one& to a go!ern$ent the& cannot !ote o#t of
off"ce.
Reason E3C 6 4a"lo#t ."ll =ot top the 7ontag"on
The Gree/ cr"s"s str"/es at the !er& heart of the el"te'dr"!en postG.orld .ar II !"s"on
of a cont"nental s#per state. Greece "s "n a f"nanc"al death sp"ral bro#ght on b&
&ears of "rrespons"ble def"c"t spend"ngHspend"ng the EU d"d noth"ng to halt.
Iet no( that cr"s"s has str#c/, accord"ng to Ger$an 7hancellor %er/el, Jnoth"ng less
than the f#t#re of E#rope, and ("th that the f#t#re of Ger$an& "n E#rope, "s at
sta/e.K Under the c"rc#$stances, "f "t (ere a tr#l& #n"@#e, "solated case one co#ld
#nderstand the efforts %er/el and other E#ropean leaders are $a/"ng to sa!e
Greece. Unfort#natel&, Greece "s not #n"@#e b#t onl& the f"rst to go "nto $eltdo(n.
%an& other nat"ons "n the EU are "n fr"ghten"ngl& s"$"lar c"rc#$stances ("th the"r
sclerot"c labor $ar/ets and bloated p#bl"c f"nances. The %ed"terranean contag"on "s
alread& #nder(a&, ("th 1ort#gal, Ital&, and pa"n "n "ts s"ghts. 7red"t $ar/ets l#lled
to sleep for &ears b& sooth"ng off"c"al state$ents are no( ("de a(a/e and are
ha!"ng none of "t, beco$"ng "ncreas"ngl& "ntolerant of an& co#ntr& ("th s#spect
f"nances. .orse, sens"ng ser"o#s e2posed (ea/nesses, spec#lat"!e (ol!es are
gather"ng for the /"ll, dr"!"ng do(n the E#ro and dr"!"ng #p borro("ng costs of the
(ea/. 1#tt"ng o#t the f"res "n Greece cannot stop the contag"on (hen there "s f#el to
b#rn else(here.
Reason E5C U.. Ta2pa&ers ho#ld =ot 1rop Up 1rofl"gate E#ropean pend"ng
.hate!er dec"s"ons are $ade "n 4erl"n, 1ar"s, and 4r#ssels, the& sho#ld not be
#nder(r"tten b& .ash"ngton. Iet that apparentl& "s (hat the 8ba$a 6d$"n"strat"on
"ntends.
6s noted abo!e, the I%- has co$$"tted f#nds as part of the Gree/ ba"lo#t. .h"le
terr"bl& e$barrass"ng to E#rope, th"s pl#s #p "s an "ns#lt to the 6$er"can ta2pa&er.
The I%-, of co#rse, "s tapp"ng f#nds pro!"ded b& "ts o(n $e$ber go!ern$ents to
part"c"pate "n the ba"lo#t. 6s "t happens, the 8ba$a 6d$"n"strat"on con!"nced
7ongress to g"!e the I%- an e2tra L100 b"ll"on "n pla& $one& last &ear.
It (as bad eno#gh (hen the federal go!ern$ent ba"led o#t 6IG, and then -ann"e
%ae and -redd"e %ac, and then $an& of the $ega ban/s, and then G% and
7hr&sler. 6t least these f"r$s had the $odest $er"t of be"ng U.. co$pan"es
e$plo&"ng U.. (or/ers. E!en "f U.. go!ern$ent f"nances (ere "n pr"st"ne shape,
U.. ta2pa&er dollars sho#ld not be #sed to ba"l o#t a perenn"all& d&sf#nct"onal
state. 4#t as spend"ng'dr"!en tr"ll"on dollar b#dget def"c"ts and a pres"dent"al debt
co$$"ss"on star/l& e!"dence, the U.. "s ser"o#sl& r"s/"ng "ts o(n Gree/'st&le
so!ere"gn debt cr"s"s. -ort#natel&, the U.. does not need an I%- ba"lo#tM "t needs
onl& a 1res"dent ("ll"ng to ac/no(ledge that he has led the co#ntr& on a Grec"an
spend"ng b"nge "t cannot afford.
Greece ("ns eas"er repa&$ent ter$s on EU ba"lo#t loans. Greece ("ll no( pa& 10
less "n "nterest and ha!e se!en and a half &ears to repa& "ts debt. If the& $a"nta"n
all the pol"c"es I th"n/ the& can repa& the loan.
What are the initiatives taken by Greece that you agree with?
In"t"at"!es ta/en b& Greece that I a$ agree ("th are descr"bed belo(
6dd"t"onal spec"f"ed ta2 $eas#res a$o#nt to abo#t 3 percent of G+1. The
go!ern$ent "s propos"ng $eas#res to o!erha#l the ta2 s&ste$, "ncl#d"ng a
progress"!e ta2 scale for all so#rces of "nco$e, ta2"ng l#2#r& goods, h"gher ta2es for
the (ealth& and h"gher ta2es on tobacco and alcohol.
The go!ern$entDs act"ons ("ll b#"ld on the"r c#rrent efforts to strengthen re!en#e
ad$"n"strat"on and red#ce ta2 e!as"on G (h"ch "s a s"gn"f"cant dra"n on the
go!ern$entDs f"nances and a so#rce of #nfa"rness "n Gree/ soc"et&.
.h"le the e$phas"s "n the Go!ern$entDs progra$ "s on red#c"ng e2pend"t#res to
s#pport co$pet"t"!eness and gro(th, re!en#e' ra"s"ng $eas#res are )#st as
essent"al to p#t the f"scal f"nances on a so#nd foot"ng. The go!ern$ent has
proposed a range of ta2 $eas#res ("th the a"$ of spread"ng the b#rden of
ad)#st$ent $ore fa"rl&.
The base of the N6T ("ll be broadened and rates "ncreased. Th"s ("ll be
co$ple$ented b& other ta2 $eas#res, for e2a$ple "n those areas (here e2c"se
ta2es are belo( the e#ro area a!erage.
The go!ern$ent plans to address th"s ("th the help of a strong ant"'e!as"on effort
and a s"gn"f"cant strengthen"ng of ta2 ad$"n"strat"on. In add"t"on, re!en#e'ra"s"ng
$eas#res fro$ the h"gher "nco$e gro#ps ("ll "ncl#deC an "ncrease "n ta2at"on on
l"beral profess"ons, an "ncrease "n the ta2at"on of l#2#r& goods, and a te$porar&
s#rcharge on h"ghl& prof"table ent"t"es and h"gh !al#ed propert"es. The
go!ern$entDs o!erarch"ng a"$ "s to "n)ect $ore fa"rness "nto the ta2 s&ste$.
pec"f"ed e2pend"t#re c#ts ("ll &"eld sa!"ngs of 5.2 percent of G+1. The go!ern$ent
"s $a"nl& propos"ng $eas#res that ("ll br"ng Greece "n l"ne ("th other, $ore
co$pet"t"!e, econo$"es. The e2tra t(o $onths salar"esHthe so'called J13th and
13thK pa&$entsHare #ns#sta"nable and do not e2"st "n $an& other co#ntr"es. =or "s
the lo( ret"re$ent age that beg"ns aro#nd 50 for so$e gro#ps "n l"ne ("th l"fe
e2pectanc&.
The go!ern$entDs progra$ recogn"<es, and ta/es "nto cons"derat"on, that the
d"ff"c#lt f"scal ad)#st$ent ("ll "n"t"all& ha!e a negat"!e effect on gro(th.
4#t ("th effect"!e "$ple$entat"on of the f"scal and str#ct#ral pol"c"es and the
s#pport of the Gree/ people, the econo$& ("ll be far better placed to generate
h"gher gro(th and e$plo&$ent than "n the past.
"o you think changes should be made with the policies being applied now?
The Gree/ econo$& "s "n a !"c"o#s c&cleC the ta2 "ncreases to close the b#dget
def"c"t are (orsen"ng a sharp econo$"c contract"on. That contract"on, "n t#rn, "s
lead"ng b#dget re!en#es to co$e "n belo( targets, (h"ch pro$pts o#ts"ders to call
on the go!ern$ent to "ntrod#ce add"t"onal f"scal $eas#res. Those $eas#res f#rther
depress econo$"c o#tp#t and the c&cle goes on. In off"c"al forecasts, the Gree/
go!ern$ent ass#$es that econo$"c gro(th ("ll so$eho( e$erge b& 2012 or G that
ass#$pt"on loo/s $ore and $ore "$pla#s"ble. The proble$ "s that Greece does not
ha!e "nf"n"te t"$e ' E#rope has been !er& pat"ent b#t "ts pat"ence "s be"ng
e2ha#sted. -aced ("th s#ch real"t&, the Gree/ go!ern$ent can e"ther tr& $ore of
the sa$e or "t can tr& to do#ble do(n. .hat "t reall& needs "s a b"gger plan.
Gree/ econo$"c pol"c& has t(o a"$sC f"scal consol"dat"on and str#ct#ral refor$s.
The for$er red#ces o#tp#t "n the short ter$, (h"le the latter ("ll "ncrease o#tp#t "n
the long ter$. The @#est"on "s, ho( long bet(een the Jshort ter$K and the Jlong
ter$K and (hat ("ll tr"gger the "nflect"on po"ntO R"ght no(, there "s !er& l"ttle go"ng
(ell for the Gree/ econo$&C cons#$pt"on "s do(n d#e to h"gher ta2es, lo(er (ages
and h"gher #ne$plo&$entM "n!est$ent "s do(n, as "t has been o!er se!eral &earsM
and state spend"ng "s do(n d#e to the need to lo(er the b#dget def"c"t. 8nl& trade
"s $a/"ng a pos"t"!e contr"b#t"on to G+1, ch"efl& beca#se Greece "s "$port"ng less,
(h"ch "s hardl& case for celebrat"on.
4ased on the go!ern$entDs $ed"#$'ter$ strateg&, the b#dget def"c"t sho#ld shr"n/
fro$ 10.30 of G+1 "n 2010 to 1.10 "n 2015. 4#t the consol"dat"on (o#ld $ostl&
co$e fro$ a red#ct"on "n spend"ng G "n fact, re!en#es (o#ld re$a"n flat as a share
of G+1. o the Gree/ cons#$er cannot reall& e2pect a ta2 brea/ an& t"$e soon. 6nd
s"nce red#ced pr"!ate spend"ng "s dr"!en b& h"gher ta2es, lo(er (ages and lo(er
e$plo&$ent, there "s l"ttle reason to th"n/ that pr"!ate cons#$pt"on ("ll r"se. Th"s "s
a !"c"o#s c&cle ("th no e2"t and no ob!"o#s "nflect"on po"nt.
The f"scal calc#l#s ass#$es a stead& b#t orderl& red#ct"on "n spend"ng. 4#t that
red#ct"on "s too slo( and perpet#ates the !"c"o#s c&cle "n pr"!ate cons#$pt"on. The
Gree/ go!ern$ent has th#s t(o opt"ons. -"rst, "t can place "ts hope on "n!est$ent.
In theor&, str#ct#ral refor$s ("ll &"eld add"t"onal "n!est$ent. 4#t ho( soon ("ll th"s
co$eO Re$e$ber that "n!est$ent pea/ed "n 200* as a share of G+1 so the co#ntr&
faces so$e deep'seated proble$s that ("ll not be ("ped o#t o!ern"ght. 6nd at )#st
150 of G+1, "t $a& too s$all to be a short'ter$ econo$"c dr"!er.
Its second opt"on "s to accelerate f"scal consol"dat"on. The $ed"#$ ter$ strateg&
forecasted spend"ng to go fro$ 500 of G+1 "n 2011 to 33.80 "n 2015, (h"le
re!en#es (ere e2pected to gro( $arg"nall& fro$ 32.60 of G+1 to 33.20 of G+1 "n
2015. .hat "s clear "s that th"s Je@#"l"br"#$K "s "ncreas"ngl& "$pla#s"ble G "t
stab"l"<es re!en#es at too h"gh a share of G+1 and offers no clear path to a
cons#$pt"on's#pported econo$"c reco!er&. To resol!e th"s proble$, the
go!ern$ent needs to slash spend"ng faster pa"red ("th a f"scal st"$#l#s "n the for$
of a ta2 brea/. .hat th"s $eans "s a sharp red#ct"on "n Jless essent"alK go!ern$ent
ser!"ces that (o#ld allo( for the go!ern$ent to $eet "ts b#dget target ("tho#t
ha!"ng to s@#ee<e cons#$ers so f#ll&. That see$s the best (a& o#t at the $o$ent.

You might also like