This document discusses the battle between big business and grassroots conservative groups like the Tea Party in Texas. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Texas Future Business Alliance are spending millions to defeat Tea Party candidates who support less regulation and oppose issues like increased immigration. This has sparked tensions within the Republican party and will come to a head at the upcoming state GOP convention over the party's platform.
(DISSERTATION) Adetoun - Legal Imperialism and The Democratization of Law Towards An African Feminist Jurisprudence On The Development of Land Law and Rights in Nigeria
This document discusses the battle between big business and grassroots conservative groups like the Tea Party in Texas. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Texas Future Business Alliance are spending millions to defeat Tea Party candidates who support less regulation and oppose issues like increased immigration. This has sparked tensions within the Republican party and will come to a head at the upcoming state GOP convention over the party's platform.
This document discusses the battle between big business and grassroots conservative groups like the Tea Party in Texas. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Texas Future Business Alliance are spending millions to defeat Tea Party candidates who support less regulation and oppose issues like increased immigration. This has sparked tensions within the Republican party and will come to a head at the upcoming state GOP convention over the party's platform.
This document discusses the battle between big business and grassroots conservative groups like the Tea Party in Texas. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Texas Future Business Alliance are spending millions to defeat Tea Party candidates who support less regulation and oppose issues like increased immigration. This has sparked tensions within the Republican party and will come to a head at the upcoming state GOP convention over the party's platform.
and it is the site of what could be the bloodiest political battle between big business and grassroots people. Te U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Texas Future Business Alliance have made their opposition to grass conservatives, specifcally the Tea Party, very clear. Te U.S. Chamber says they want no more fools nominated for ofce by the Republicans. Te fools they refer to are Tea Party candidates. To back up their stand, they have been using a $50 million bank account in eforts to defeat Tea Party conservative candidates in the primaries. In Texas, Te Texas Future Business Alliance has sent out mailers and pro- vided support on behalf of GOP candi- dates who support water infrastructure development, highway construction and education spending. In other words they are businesses that live of of big govern- ment projects. One business insider has told the Dallas Morning News, its part of the same trend youre seeing nationally. A lot of the business community is tired of people who dont want to govern. Te Business Alliances spokesman Da- vid Polyansky, said the business alliance aims to recognize leaders dedicated to keeping Texas as the best state in the na- tion for business development and job growth. What these business leaders con- tinue to ignore, they need to grass- roots conservative to win. Grassroots conservative want less regulation and greater market freedom which would benefit business. The election of Ted Cruz as U.S. Sen- ator, couple with the recent primary victory by Dan Patrick for Lieutenant Governor, as well as the victories by several Tea Party backed state senato- rial candidates appears to have set the stage of nasty platform fight in Fort Worth at the GOP state convention this week. The battle over the Texas Solution platform which the GOP Establishment supports and the Tea Party opposes. Grassroots Tea Party leaders view it the Texas Solution as a cheap labor plat- form masquerading as guest worker program and Hispanic Outreach. They accurately point out high unemploy- ment and under-employment rate in the U.S., the huge number people on welfare, continued lack of border en- forcement and punishment of em- ployers who hire illegal aliens, and the Obama administrations willingness to play politics with federal immigration laws. So how will this battle play out? One Latino restaurant owner in San Anto- nio who claims to be a conservative Re- publican, has already endorsed Leticia Van De Putte, the Democrat candidate for Lt. Governor because he dislikes Patricks immigration position. Its very curious to me how big busi- ness can ally themselves with liberals and big government. Their position on cheap labor should not be surpris- ing to grassroots conservatives. Busi- ness groups have backed gay friendly legislation, affirmative action, abortion health care coverage, common core, and always big spending items. A perfect example is how last year in May 2013, David Zachry, CEO of the San Antonio-based construction firm Zachry Corp. and big chamber supporter, pressed state lawmakers, including Leticia Van De Putte, to cir- cumvent a bills limits on the construc- tion of hotels in a redeveloped San An- tonios HemisFair Park. The legislation granted the city authority to reconfig- ure public land, without seeking voter approval. I guess some business folks believe government and business seem can work best when they just ignore and remove those messy little grassroots people from the process. Te wheels of government are reputed to move rather slowly, and we all moan and groan about it because things arent happening fast enough to suit us. Every now and then, however, those wheels reach NASCAR speeds and we moan and groan about it because its happening too fast for us. A case in point would be the recent maneuvering by the City of Gonzales and Gonzales Economic Development Corp. to purchase Jon Harris old Tacti- cal Paintball property near Harwood for use as an industrial park. Te details on how it all went down are noted in our news story on the subject, but heres a quick summary of events: A locator company representing an- other company which was looking to lo- cate a facility somewhere in Texas (we as- sume Central Texas) was directed by the Governors Ofce on Economic Devel- opment to Gonzales and, apparently, several other municipalities. Te locator informed Gonzales Economic Develop- ment Corp. what kind of property it was looking for, and that the company it was representing required anonymity as a condition of negotiations. GEDC located that kind of property, in the form of the old paintball range a few miles outside city limits. GEDC informed the locator, which then ex- plained it had a specifc timeline associ- ated with the project and that timeline called for much faster action than the GEDCs legal requirement of giving 60 days notice before purchasing property. GEDC approached the City of Gon- zales about the issue, because state law gives the city the ability to purchase property outside city limits for econom- ic development with no notice whatso- ever and under terms very favorable for businesses such as the one in question. GEDC proposed the city buy the prop- erty, then GEDC would buy it from the city in due course in accordance with its 60-day requirement. City Council recognized that there is only one economic presence in Gonzales County along Interstate 10 that being the Shell station just outside Waelder. Even if the company in question did not take the property, Council recognized that eventually some business would, and the property would no doubt con- tribute to the citys revenues. With the City on board, GEDC authorized an ofer (incentivization of Confdential Project AG-47) to the loca- tor company to pass along to its client. Tat ofer was not accepted; the details of that ofer are thus exempt from public disclosure. Te City now owns the land, and GEDC is in its 60-day process to pur- chase it. Everything involved in all of the ac- tions are 100 percent above-board and meet the letter of the law. Like some others in the community, my curiosity radar went of while cover- ing the meetings during which the proj- ect was discussed and approved. Of particular curiosity was when the GEDC board approved the incentiviza- tion of Confdential Project AG-47, because GEDCs recent history has been to be very up-front about incentivization deals: they want people to know busi- ness is liking the climate here. Unfortunately the confdential nature of the request from the business locator wasnt made as clear as it could have been and we guys in the news media didnt ask the right questions which could have enabled an answer to help clear things up before now. Tats water under the bridge. Property owners in the area sur- rounding the land purchase certainly have cause to be concerned. Te city has said it has no plans to annex any other areas to make the purchase contiguous to current city limits but thats now. Other ofers, other growth, could change that. Some have complained that there was not enough opportunity for the public to have input, that folks didnt have enough information on what was going on to come to an informed opinion on it. Part of the quickness on the part of some folks to question the transparency of this all, no doubt, stems from the fact that a prior city manager was known for a lack of transparency, prone to do- ing things on his own without seeking Councils guidance (or, in some cases, without telling them at all). From this writers perspective, the local leaders we have elected to make these decisions have resolved that issue. Tats part of the nature in operat- ing as a republican form of govenrment versus operating as a true democracy. Sometimes, you just have to trust the people youve elected to make the right call. The Cannon Thursday, June 12, 2014 Page A4 In Our View Big Business attacks Tea Party In Our View Time for a ban on texting, driving Sometimes, you have to trust those you elect THE GONZALES CANNON (USPS 001-390) is published weekly each Thursday by Gonzales Cannon Inc., 618 St. Paul Street, Gonzales, TX 78629. Periodicals Postage Paid at Gonzales, TX 78629. A one year subscription costs $25 both in- county and out-of county. E-subscriptions are $15 per year. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Gonzales Cannon, PO Box E, Gonzales, TX 78629. An erroneous refection upon the charactor, stand- ing or reputation of any frm, person or corporation, which appears in the columns of this newspaper will be corrected upon due notice given to the publication at The Gonzales Cannon offce. Offce hours are 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Phone: (830) 672-7100. Fax: (830) 672-7111. Website:www.gonzalescannon.com. THE GONZALES CANNON BOARD OF DIRECTORS Billy Bob Low Chairman Sissy Mills, Vice Chairman Mary Lou Philippus, Secretary Myrna McLeroy Alice Hermann Dave Mundy - Editor & General Manager manager@gonzalescannon.com Debbie Toliver - Advertising Director advertising@gonzalescannon.com Dorothy Gast - Business Manager dot@gonzalescannon.com Mark Lube - Sports Editor sportseditor@gonzalescannon.com Sanya Harkey - Circulation/Classifeds subscriptions@gonzalescannon.com Letters to the Editor letters@gonzalescannon.com 2014 Dances with Chihuahuas Dave Mundy General Manager El Conservador George Rodriguez is a San Antonio resident. He is the former President of the San Antonio Tea Party, and is now Executive Director of the South Texas Politi- cal Alliance. George Rodriguez You cannot legislate common sense any more than you can legislate morality. The time has come, however, to support legislation which will at least raise awareness and, perhaps, help peo- ple come to their senses. Advances in communications technology con- tinue to expand our ability to communicate with others. Unfortunately, those advances have cre- ated a monstrous danger on our roads and high- ways. There have been some attempts in the past to introduce statewide legislation to ban the use of cell phones and hand-held devices while driving. It is time for the state Legislature and local gov- ernments to seriously consider enacting such a statute. The Texas Department of Transportations latest fgures indicate that one in four crashes involves driver distraction. Drivers who use cell phones in their vehicles have a higher risk of collision than drivers who dont, whether holding the phone or using a hands-free device. State law does provide for such a prohibition in school zones, and some municipalities around Texas have enacted local ordinances prohibiting cell phone/handheld device use while driving. There is insufcient data to indicate whether these local ordinances have had a major impact on the habits of drivers, but at the very least they have raised awareness of the danger of distracted driving. Several recent tragedies and near-tragedies lo- cally have been linked directly to texting while driving. Especially given the increase in trafc volume in Gonzales and surrounding counties as- sociated with heavy industrial equipment, it has become vital for all drivers to give their full atten- tion to the road. This is especially crucial for younger and less-ex- perienced drivers who are, unfortunately, the people most likely to be using hand-held technol- ogy while driving. Even among very experienced drivers, it takes only fractions of a second for a vehicle moving at high speed to go of-course as a result of dis- tracted driving. Current state law targets those younger drivers: Drivers with learners permits are prohibited from using handheld cell phones in the frst six months of driving, and drivers under the age of 18 are pro- hibited from using any wireless communications device. Beyond enacting statutes, we urge readers to take matters into their own hands as well. Do not text or hold phone conversations with anyone you know is driving. It can wait. Drivers: we urge you to drive now and talk later. If you must make a phone call, pull over and stop. Otherwise, wait until you reach your destination to use the phone.
(DISSERTATION) Adetoun - Legal Imperialism and The Democratization of Law Towards An African Feminist Jurisprudence On The Development of Land Law and Rights in Nigeria