Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Meritocracy, Horatio Alger, American Dream Narrative Affirmative Action Introduction
Meritocracy, Horatio Alger, American Dream Narrative Affirmative Action Introduction
Meritocracy, Horatio Alger, American Dream Narrative Affirmative Action Introduction
01.15.14
Meritocracy, Horatio Alger, American dream narrative
Affirmative action introduction
1. Social Stratification: the existence of structured inequalities among different groups
Question: how do we explain inequality between groups?
Group differences, the question of being part of a group. oes ability and age affect how
your opportunity is structured?
Sometimes, these terms are applied to indi!iduals. "owe!er, mostly they#re applied on a
group le!el.
Social stratification doesn#t always mean economics, yet it#s often interpreted as sociology
by loo$ing at economic status.
%. &lass: Socioeconomic differences between groups that create differences in material prosperity
and power
&lass !s. race approach to policies 'for instance, college apps(. "ow do you measure class?
"ousehold income, personal income?
"ow is class conceptuali)ed by social theorists?
*ot +ust thin$ing about economic ownership, but also economic power and prestige. &an
you enforce an agenda? &an you ma$e impact on others# li!es? ,hat is your status?
-. .ife chances: opportunities for achie!ing economic prosperity
/his term comes from 0ax ,eber, a German social theorist. "e also thought about social
status and prestige. /here is a difference here between 12/&103S and
14415/2*6/63S, where he#s focusing on opportunities. So, sometimes we see people
granted the same 144S to compete, without thought of actual economic outcomes.
7. Social mobility: mo!ement of indi!iduals and groups between class positions
3!en in the 2S, social mobility doesn#t happen much. 4eople don#t often change their
class.
/hin$ about &.8SS 41S6/61*. ,hat ma$es a class a class? 'upper, middle, lower(
1ften, it#s connected to economic status as well as educational bac$ground. 9our culture,
taste, consumption patterns also factor in. :or instance, the consumption of white bread is
seen as ;lower class,< and some people refuse to consume it as a status marker. "ow is
class status measured and percei!ed? 6s the 1= the only $ind of upper class that exists?
/hin$ about economic ownership and also the relationship of the groups to each other.
6ntragenerational: mobility in course of people#s wor$ing li!es
o 6ndi!idual le!el. 6t#s also associated with the low-range concept.
6ntergenerational: mobility across generations
o 3mbedded is assumption that things S"12. get better. 2se this type of data to
show 451G53SS :15 G5124S. &i!il 5ights mo!ement, etc.
o 8lso a question of assimilation: are you able to be a full 8merican? .egal
citi)enship? Social acceptance?
3xchange: exchange of positions where most talented in each generation mo!e up and less
talented mo!e down
Structural: upward mobility made possible by expansion of better>paid occupations at
expense of more poorly paid ones
o 1ften measured as socioeconomic assimilation
.ow>range: mo!ement from lower social bac$ground to a high status +ob 'not
necessarily high>PAYING?(
o 3xamples: 1bama came from a single>parent household, grew up on social welfare,
came from modest wor$ing>class bac$ground 'socioeconomic status(. 1n the other
hand, he attended elite schools, and his mother has a 4h. "e was also raised in a
white household@ would someone in the same racial bac$ground ha!e the same
opportunity for mobility? ';"on$ey<: white man who escaped housing pro+ects due
to his race, whereas many of his blac$ associates couldn#t.( 6f 1bama had been
raised in a primarily blac$ household, would he ha!e the same amount of social
mobility?
o "igh>status !s. high>paying: pay attention to the networ$s that one forms.
o .ow>range mo!ement is often at the le!el of the individual. 1ften the exception
more often than the rule. "ow does ;exceptional< ability get in!o$ed, though?
Aertical: mo!ement up or down socioeconomic scale
2pward: upward mo!ement in property, income, or status
ownward: downward mo!ement in property, income, or status
o ,hat are some groups that experience downward mobility as a group?
o 8ging: when one retiresBstops wor$ing, most people ha!e a certain le!el of
downward mobility. "ow far you fall depends on existing wealth and existing
resources. ,hat are your sa!ings? :amily? :riends? Safety net?
o 0a+or foreclosure crisis: textboo$ said that downward mo!ement doesn#t really
happen in the 2S. :alse? /here are probably a lot more people today who ha!e
experienced this due to the economic crisis. 8 lot of people#s wealth is in their
homes@ some racial groups ha!e largerBdisproportionate share of their wealth in
their homes.
.ayoffs, inability to get +obs
2nemployment insurance getting cut recently
.osing pensions
C. 0eritocracy: social order where rewards distributed in accordance with criteria of personal
merit
System of go!ernance 'not +ust discourseBrhetoric, but actually how society is organi)ed(
with brightest and most conscientious indi!iduals accurately occupying most important
positions based on talent and achie!ements
o :lip side: if you are not occupying these positions, assume you aren#t best and
brightest, don#t ha!e talent to get these achie!ements
5ewards are ;earned,< you#re getting returns based on the amount and quality of your
wor$
Social capital: Bhuman capital, connected with meritocracy. Deen embraced by liberals as
critique of meritocracy ;it#s not what you $now, but who you $now.< Dut de!eloping
these networ$s is sometimes through merit itself.
,here does this fit into debates on affirmati!e action? 0eritocracy is often tal$ed about as
being a myth or a narrati!eE
F. *arrati!e: story that depicts sequence of fictional or non>fictional e!ents
4romotes beliefs about history, social inequality, and power dynamics
0obili)es emotional and political responses
&ultural imagery and metaphorsBsymbolism: how ha!e political campaigns engaged in
imagery to depict the aggrie!ed, results of policies, etc?
&elebrity stories: what#s the audience#s reaction to a story of hard>times that ended o$ay?
4eople usually applaud that. 6f someone ended on a miserable note, no applause. As. a
story of a dad calling and getting his son into acting scene.
0obili)ation of the 8merican ream. 4eople will be 01A3 by this type of story, which
is told to e!o$e a certain emotional responds. 9ou might be in certain circles 6#ll ne!er be
in, etc, but your story gi!es me "143. /hat all it ta$es is hard wor$@ that the reason 6#m
not getting anywhere is because 6#m not wor$ing hard enough.
0eritocracy is also promoting the idea that it#s wor$ ethic that gets you where you#re at.
/hat the people at the top simply wor$ harder than e!eryone else. 3mbedded in policy
itself are narrati!es.
Horatio Alger: city life lit of 1GCH#s. 6ndustriali)ation. 9outh delinquency. 5ags>to>riches
stories, populari)ing imagery of wayward boys li!ing rough life in city, dog>eat>dog
en!ironment, who through pluc$>In>luc$ found their way through hard times. /here#s an
idea that through their pursuit of hard wor$, they can o!ercome. 8t the heart of
meritocracy discourse, you recogni)e there#s inequality.
Meritocracy narratives: cut across class, can be shared e!en between classes one would
usually thin$ conflicted with the narrati!e. 1ften there#s a clash of narrati!es in policy
debates.
8ffirmati!e 8ction
J. 3xecuti!e 1rder GGH%
Executive orders are issued by the president, and don#t require appro!al of &ongress.
:5 used executi!e orders wilfully.
GGH% issued by :5 1K71, during ,,66. ,,66 significant for many minorities to ma$e
political demands on go!ernment. ,,66, concerns about racial inequality becoming issue
of national stability. &oncerns about other countries being able to exploit racial conflict in
2S for own agenda. 2S, as act of national defense, wanted to ha!e e!eryone on>board with
these policies. So agencies targeted national go!ernment to 3>S3G53G8/3 +obs,
policies, etc. Lobs in certain sectors 'efense Sector, for ex( expanded.
4rohibits discrimination in employment in federal agencies and all unionsBcompanies
in!ol!ed in war>related wor$
Go!ernment +obs under ;public sector<. "istorically see %>pronged effort: people try to get
access to go!t +obs 'tax funded(, and pri!ate sector 'owned by for>profit companies(.
3mphasi)ed race, creed 'religion(, color, or national origin
o MM58&3 and &1.15 here used differently. 6nteresting scholarship on SN6*
S"83 inequality: for ex, % people in same race, but with diff s$in shadesOhow
does this impact their socioeconomic opps?