Mr bowen: paid parental leave discriminates against "stay-at-home mothers" Under Labor's paid parental leave scheme, unwaged working mothers are left on the scrap heap. It is hypocritical for Labor to be pointing the finger given its track record on family support payments.
Mr bowen: paid parental leave discriminates against "stay-at-home mothers" Under Labor's paid parental leave scheme, unwaged working mothers are left on the scrap heap. It is hypocritical for Labor to be pointing the finger given its track record on family support payments.
Mr bowen: paid parental leave discriminates against "stay-at-home mothers" Under Labor's paid parental leave scheme, unwaged working mothers are left on the scrap heap. It is hypocritical for Labor to be pointing the finger given its track record on family support payments.
Hon Chris Bowen MP Shadow Treasurer Member for McMahon Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600
via e-mail: chris.bowen.mp@aph.gov.au
Dear Mr Bowen,
Thank you for your letter dated 17 June 2014 regarding paid parental leave (PPL).
I am opposed to paid parental leave because it actively discriminates against so-called stay-at-home mothers or, as I prefer to call them, unwaged mothers performing their own child care. I hold this view because I believe mothers who perform their own long- term childcare are just as productive as those who choose to be in the paid workforce.
You state in your letter that together, we can stand up for regional Australia by opposing the Liberal National Coalitions PPL scheme. But why would I want to stand together with a party that stands accused of the very unfairness it tries to brand the government with?
You see, Mr Bowen, it was Labor that implemented an unfair PPL scheme to start with. You began the rot. You started the discrimination against unwaged mothers.
Under Labors paid parental leave scheme, unwaged working mothers are left on the scrap heap. For a woman who, five years ago, left her paid career to become a full-time mother, caring for her child herself, until that child was of school age, and who then became pregnant again in the past nine months, your paid parental leave delivers nothing.
So, Labor stands accused of this discrimination.
Your letter also refers to changes to the Family Tax Benefit system. While I have some concern with the changes in the budget, it is highly hypocritical for Labor to be pointing the finger given its recent track record on family support payments.
I would remind you that back in 2011, then Minister for Families Jenny Macklin said Labor was budgeting for the baby bonus to continue right out into the future and that Labor wont be scrapping the baby bonus because they understand how important it is to provide financial support to families when a baby comes into the home. Two years later, Labor axed the baby bonus.
So, Labor stands accused of lying (and not for the first or last time).
Prior to this, Labor had whittled away at programs that supported parents who chose to care for their children until they were of school age. The baby bonus that you eventually completely axed had been progressively hacked away at for years. In 2011, then Treasurer Wayne Swan cut the baby bonus by $400 a year and then, in 2012, he cut the baby bonus from $5,000 to $3,000 for children other than the first-born.
So, Labor stands accused of penny-pinching.
When Kevin Rudd was Prime Minister the first time around, Labor stripped more than $3,250 a year in Family Tax Benefit B out of the pockets of more than 40,000 families in which one parent earned $150,000 or more while the spouse remained out of the paid workforce in order to provide care for their children. These are similar to the Family Tax Benefit changes currently being made by the Abbott government that youre now condemning.
So, Labor stands accused of hypocrisy.
My desire is to see a fair and equitable policy that will assist those unwaged mothers who choose to undertake their own child care. A universal childcare benefit may be the solution or perhaps income splitting or some form of family-based taxation. These are all great ideas but they cost. And you, as a former Treasurer, left the nation careering towards a debt of more than $667 billion. So there is little to no financial capacity to bring in such measures at this point in time.
So, Labor stands accused of squandering our wealth.
Im sorry, Mr Bowen, I wont join with the Labor Party to stand up for regional Australia. As a member of the Nationals, I stand up for regional Australia in my own right.
Labor, however, stands accused of unfairness, discrimination, lying, penny-pinching, hypocrisy and squandering our wealth. And, going by the evidence Ive outlined in this letter, your party is guilty on all counts.
No, Mr Bowen, I wont be standing together with Labor, a party that has such a poor track record in supporting families.