Cracking was discovered in the rudder trunks of two BC Ferries Spirit-Class vessels, the Spirit of British Columbia and Spirit of Vancouver Island. A technical analysis using finite element modeling identified high stress areas in the rudder trunk structure likely caused by fatigue from propeller wash during stern landing maneuvers. An in-situ repair procedure was developed using multi-pass welding to fully remove and repair the cracks, allowing repair without removing the entire rudder trunk structure. The procedure was successfully implemented to repair both vessels' rudder trunks in their scheduled drydock periods, avoiding substantial costs compared to replacing the trunk structures.
Cracking was discovered in the rudder trunks of two BC Ferries Spirit-Class vessels, the Spirit of British Columbia and Spirit of Vancouver Island. A technical analysis using finite element modeling identified high stress areas in the rudder trunk structure likely caused by fatigue from propeller wash during stern landing maneuvers. An in-situ repair procedure was developed using multi-pass welding to fully remove and repair the cracks, allowing repair without removing the entire rudder trunk structure. The procedure was successfully implemented to repair both vessels' rudder trunks in their scheduled drydock periods, avoiding substantial costs compared to replacing the trunk structures.
Cracking was discovered in the rudder trunks of two BC Ferries Spirit-Class vessels, the Spirit of British Columbia and Spirit of Vancouver Island. A technical analysis using finite element modeling identified high stress areas in the rudder trunk structure likely caused by fatigue from propeller wash during stern landing maneuvers. An in-situ repair procedure was developed using multi-pass welding to fully remove and repair the cracks, allowing repair without removing the entire rudder trunk structure. The procedure was successfully implemented to repair both vessels' rudder trunks in their scheduled drydock periods, avoiding substantial costs compared to replacing the trunk structures.
Cracking was discovered in the rudder trunks of two BC Ferries Spirit-Class vessels, the Spirit of British Columbia and Spirit of Vancouver Island. A technical analysis using finite element modeling identified high stress areas in the rudder trunk structure likely caused by fatigue from propeller wash during stern landing maneuvers. An in-situ repair procedure was developed using multi-pass welding to fully remove and repair the cracks, allowing repair without removing the entire rudder trunk structure. The procedure was successfully implemented to repair both vessels' rudder trunks in their scheduled drydock periods, avoiding substantial costs compared to replacing the trunk structures.
Presented by: Bob Kearney, Naval Architect, Paul Radford, Engineering Superintendent Bruce Paterson, P.Eng., Fleet Technical Director, British Columbia Ferry Services, Inc. Gordon Beynon, Principal Engineer Kent LeClair, Sr. Welding Technologist BMT Fleet Technology Limited Presented to: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Pacific Northwest Section Technical Meeting 26 April, 2008 Victoria, BC S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING Presentation Outline: 1. Background 2. Problem Identification 3. Technical Analysis 4. Repair Procedure 5. Repair Implementation 6. Conclusions Spirit Class vessel enroute S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 1. BACKGROUND Class History The SPIRIT- Class vessels: M.V. Spirit of British Columbia (SoBC) and Spirit of Vancouver Island (SoVI). Constructed in 1993 (SoBC) and 1994 (SoVI). The vessels operate on Route 1, Tsawwassen to Swartz Bay and each operates approximately 5500 hours annually. As of Summer 2007, the SoBC had operated for over 75,000 hours, and the SoVI had operated for over 70,000 hours . The two vessels account for almost 20% of the traffic carried annually by the BC Ferries system. The SoBC is home ported in Tsawwassen; the SoVI is home ported in Swartz Bay. S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 1. BACKGROUND Technical Summary Principal Particulars: The S-Class are singled-ended (conventional), main propulsion consists of four (4x) 4500kW medium speed diesels driving twin (2x) 3.5m dia. CPP propellers at a constant 200 RPM. The two vessels are fitted with twin Becker flapped rudders 4.5mdeep x 2.5m chord. Steering is via Rotary Vane units, maximum angle up to 55 degrees, and can be operated in split (separate) modes. Twin bow thrusters are fitted, 750 kW ea, variable pitch units. 11642 tonnes Displacement 8998 tonnes Lightship 15600 KW Propulsion Power 470 AEQ 8.0 m Depth 27.2 m Beam Overall 167.5 m Length Overall S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 1. BACKGROUND Rudder Arrangement S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 1. BACKGROUND Operating Profile The vessels are single ended (conventional stern propulsion) are loaded from both ends (drive through loading access). Loading at Swartz Bay is by the stern. Loading at Tsawwassen is by the bow. Operating Cycle: Transit Time = 95 minutes Swartz Bay to Tsawwassen: Direct (no reversing operations). Tsawwassen to Swartz Bay: Vessels back out at Tsawwassen and then turn 180. On approach to Swartz Bay the vessels do a sweep manoeuvre and land stern to. Loading operations at Tsawwassen Each vessel makes four round trips daily, corresponding to a 16 hour day, exclusive of start up and shut down time. S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 1. BACKGROUND Operational Profile Making a stern landing at Swartz Bay In terms of stresses on the rudder structure, interest focused on two phases of the transit: 1. Each vessel makes four stern landings at Swartz Bay. This involves operating the port shaft ahead and the stbd shaft astern to swing the stern into the berth. 2. Route involves transit of Active Pass, where the vessels must work in high tidal currents, and where protocols may dictate changes in speed to meet opposing vessels at prescribed locations. S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 2. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Cracks were discovered in the port side rudder trunks during an underwater survey of the rudders in August 2007 on the SoVI. A follow- up survey found a similar problem on the SoBC. In terms of the operating profile, with a focus on SWB landing: The rudders operate independently; the port rudder is turned to port with thrust directed ahead while the starboard rudder remains straight . With the port rudder turned so far to port it presents considerable area to the propeller flow. Flap rudders are high lift and are still effective. FWD STBD PORT THRUST THRUST TURNING FORCE PROPELLER INDUCED VIBRATION S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 2. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Extent of Damage Area of cracking indicated in red U/W survey identified radial cracking in the rudder trunk (carrying the rudder stock) at the junction with the hull fairing. cracking most severe outboard on the Port side; worst case (SoVI) crack over 55 % of trunk circumference, 45mm at deepest point. also inboard but much smaller extent. Starboard side showed a similar pattern, but again less extensive. Cracking was also more severe on the SoVI (1994) than the SoBC (1993). Extent confirmed by ultrasonic surveys afloat and in dry dock. S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 2. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Extent of Damage J anuary 2008 NDT shearwave ultrasonic survey mapped extent of cracking in rudder trunk. Rudder cracking was 50% of rudder trunk tube. S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 2. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Initial Assessment & Repair Sept 2007 divers attempted underwater repair of SoVI at Swartz Bay to extend service to next drydocking in J anuary 2009. Gouged out weld to depth of ~35mm and re-welded. Uncertain if crack fully gouged but reluctant to go deeper. Added 2thick brackets to strengthen area. All work done with Class in attendance. December 2007 Underwater survey indicated that the weld repair done in September was now cracked. U/T survey performed in J anuary Maintenance Interval indicated original crack not arrested; uncertain if cracks had gone through the trunk (t>76mm). S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 3. TECHNICAL ANALYSIS In early J anuary 2008 BCF Fleet Technical Engineering carried out a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of the rudder trunk structure. The FEA analysis identified the hotspotstress areas on the trunk structure. Forces applied laterally and torsionally to represent action of prop wash. Magnitudes were indicative as actual forces on rudder were not known. The FEA analysis did point to another area of the rudder trunk with a high probability of cracks occurring. Cracks had not yet been observed in that location. The area of known cracking involved higher level of restraint; local weld design and defects may also have been a factor. SoVI cracking more severe than older SoBC: Fabrication issue? Exposure time in SWB? S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 3. TECHNICAL ANALYSIS FEA Model of Rudder Trunk Structure FEA Post Processing Stress Contours AREA OF ESTABLISHED CRACKING AREA OF PREDICTED CRACKING S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 3. TECHNICAL ANALYSIS The following factors: crack geometry radial, extending to the interior. age of the vessels (>12 years). common crack positions on SOVI and SoBC, and the hot spot locations. indicate fatigue induced by the prop wash as the most probable factor in the failure in the rudder trunks. S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 4. REPAIR PROCEDURE 1. Class required the cracking repaired before return to service. 2. OEM indicated entire trunk structure would have to be removed and repaired in a shop. Significant costs direct and in terms of loss of hire (~30 days). BMT Fleet Technology Limited (BMT-FTL) approached regarding use of a narrow gapmulti-pass weld procedure that would allow an in-situ repair. BMT-FTL responded with a proposal to develop a procedure for partial- and full depth cracks. S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 4. REPAIR PROCEDURE- Issues Weld process selection. #Weld passes required. Gouged profile for weld. Preparation - Cleaning/de-greasing for through-thickness procedure. Pre-heat requirements and implementation in dry dock conditions. Maintaining trunk symmetry during process. Cool down time and inspection requirements. Checking of new weld radius. Approvals. S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 4. REPAIR PROCEDURE- Issues SMAW process selected to meet positional welding requirement. Multiple weld passes and block welding technique required due to overhead position and thickness of repair. Crack removal by gouging, grinding and MT (magnetic testing) to verify removal. Pre-heat for large cracks with resistance heating blankets and torch heat to assist. Interim MT after first 2 layers and after half completed. Pre-heat maintained until repairs complete and examined by MT. Maintained trunk symmetry during process by balancing welding. Slow cool and 24 hr delay before final MT. Approvals Class (ABS). S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 4. REPAIR PROCEDURE- Modified Profile Rudder OEM recommended modification of radius at junction of rudder trunk with base plate. Reduces Notch effect. S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 5. REPAIR IMPLEMENTATION - SoVI January 2008 - SoVI enters Esquimalt Graving Dock. Port Rudder and stock are removed. Crack gouged to good material. Cracking found in area predicted by FEA model. Cracking determined not to be through, approx 50-60% thickness. Three shift welding. Alignment checking with scope. Repair procedure implemented in a 5 day window using time scheduled for SoBC dry docking. Sp1 -3.3 120.0 C 0 20 40 60 80 100 FLIR Systems S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 5. REPAIR IMPLEMENTATION - SoBC January 2008 - SoBC enters Esquimalt Graving Dock following SoVI to resume scheduled dry docking period. Cracks gouged to determine extent of cracking, cracking not as deep as SoVI, but port rudder and stock still needed to be removed. Repair procedure implemented in a 7 day window. -7.1 135.0 C 0 50 100 FLIR Systems S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING S-CLASS RUDDER TRUNK CRACKING 6. CONCLUSIONS 1. Project was a multi-disciplinary success addressing a complex problem involving multiple parties: BCF Engineering (Fleet Engineering, Fleet Planning & Fleet Technical). BMT Fleet Technology Limited. All-Sea Enterprises / Elander Inspection. Becker Marine Systems. Victoria Shipyard and Esquimalt Graving Dock. Acuren Group Inc 2. The successful implementation of an in-situ repair saved BCF substantial costs in direct costs and in loss of hire. 3. Problem has been identified and will be monitored. 4. Vessel Masters are identifying changes to docking procedures that will result is less fatigue-inducing loading of the rudder trunk.