- Richard Davidson produced an immense compendium on sexuality in the Old Testament organized into three sections: Sexuality in Eden, outside Eden, and return to Eden.
- Davidson presents sexuality as founded on ideals in Genesis 1-3 and sees later biblical texts as engaging distorted sexuality outside Eden. The Song of Songs depicts full redemption of sexuality to the Edenic paradigm.
- While Davidson's analysis of sexuality outside Eden is masterful, his conclusions about the Song of Songs being about Solomon's early marriage are unlikely and ignore provocative messages the Song may have had.
- Richard Davidson produced an immense compendium on sexuality in the Old Testament organized into three sections: Sexuality in Eden, outside Eden, and return to Eden.
- Davidson presents sexuality as founded on ideals in Genesis 1-3 and sees later biblical texts as engaging distorted sexuality outside Eden. The Song of Songs depicts full redemption of sexuality to the Edenic paradigm.
- While Davidson's analysis of sexuality outside Eden is masterful, his conclusions about the Song of Songs being about Solomon's early marriage are unlikely and ignore provocative messages the Song may have had.
- Richard Davidson produced an immense compendium on sexuality in the Old Testament organized into three sections: Sexuality in Eden, outside Eden, and return to Eden.
- Davidson presents sexuality as founded on ideals in Genesis 1-3 and sees later biblical texts as engaging distorted sexuality outside Eden. The Song of Songs depicts full redemption of sexuality to the Edenic paradigm.
- While Davidson's analysis of sexuality outside Eden is masterful, his conclusions about the Song of Songs being about Solomon's early marriage are unlikely and ignore provocative messages the Song may have had.
the f l ame of yahwe h: s e xual i t y i n the ol d
te s tame nt Richard M. Davidson (Peabody: Hendrickson, 2007), xxix + 844 pp. ISBN 9781565638471. Richard M. Davidson has produced an immense and valuable compendium on sexuality in the Old Testament. He has organized his vast wealth of research into three sections based on his view of the theology of sexuality as presented in Scripture: Sexuality in Eden, Sexuality outside the Garden, and Return to Eden. Davidson presents a theology of sexuality as founded primarily upon the ideals of the Hebrew creation account in Genesis 1 3. He then sees the presentation of sexuality in the Torah, Prophets and Writings as a redemptive engagement of distorted sexuality outside Eden. From Davidsons perspective the Song of Songs is the theological conclusion, focused on the full redemption of sexuality to the paradigm of Eden. Davidson exhibits an excellent depth of dialogue with scholarship on the creation accounts in Genesis and successfully presents a strong argument for sexuality as dened by Eden as an inuential motif for later biblical writings on issues of sexuality. Davidson goes beyond exploring the Edenic theology of sexuality by making overt connections to modern relationships. hrough his exploration of the Edenic paradigm Davidson majestically reopens the way back to Eden for the modern Christian couple. Davidson denes the Edenic paradigm of sexuality as liberated, intimate, holistic, covenanted and sacred. he reader is invited to embrace this paradigm in modern marriage. Davidson also describes the Edenic sexual paradigm as egalitarian, which he supports through a close reading of the Hebrew of Genesis. It was an unexpected disappointment, however, to see Davidson contradict his Edenic paradigm in an attempt to reconcile the egalitarian Eden with other wider biblical norms of sexuality that promote hierarchy. Davidson relinquishes his fascinating thesis and makes an unsatisfying attempt at reconciliation using Gen 3:16 as a key prop. Davidson claims that regardless of the Edenic paradigm the modern Christian marriage relationship is not to be fully egalitarian (76). Women, according to Davidson, must continue to play a non-egalitarian role with respect to their male marriage partner. Davidsons argument (7180) on this subject seems to lack the objectivity and consistency that he declares as the basis of his study, the hermeneutic of consent (3). Davidsons section on Sexuality outside the Garden is a masterful 103 Book Reviews analysis of Scripture dealing with every possible facet of normative (and non- normative) sexuality in the Torah, Prophets and Writings. A particularly interesting feature of Davidsons research is his regular forays into comparative legal studies in the ANE. hough Davidson characteristically presents Ugaritic and other extant literature of the ANE in a negative light in comparison to Mosaic law, his location and collation of this historic data, and the scholarship surrounding it, is a valuable resource. Of interest is Davidsons critique of the fertility cult of the ANE and its social impact. His presentation of the redemptive quality of the Old Testaments theology of sexuality in this case is persuasive. In the concluding section, Davidson presents the Song of Songs as the biblical picture of the redemption of sexuality, Eden re-entered. Davidson prefers a natural interpretation of the Song of Songs, as do many modern scholars. However his exegesis of the Song produces unusual conclusions considering the general consensus of Songs scholars such as Landy, Pope, Fox, Exum, Keel and Brenner. Davidsons highly conservative and yet highly unusual approach does not adequately represent the challenges of interpreting the Song. Davidson presents the authorship of the Song as by Solomon in his early years (566) and its subject matter concerning his long-lasting (568) marriage to the Egyptian Princess. Davidson details scriptural support for his view but his conclusions remain tenuous. It seems highly unlikely, considering Solomons place as monarch in Hebrew society and the precedent set by his father and brothers, as well as the legitimizing customs of the times, and his later fame as a husband of a thousand women (1 Kgs 11:3), that Solomon would, as Davidson claims, choose to enjoy a lengthy monogamous marital relationship with one woman (567) and that this experience produced the Song of Songs. he theology that Davidson develops from the Song is well worth consideration but seems inappropriately balanced on the tenuous setting and authorship he proposes for the Song and altogether too neatly conservative. Davidson ignores any provocative message the Song may have for the religious establishment of the time, and also overplays the mutuality of the two protagonists in the Song. Davidson provides in his book Flame of Yahweh a valuable resource by compiling a wealth of information, scholarship and comparative data on sexuality in Ancient Israel and the ANE. Davidsons arrangement of his research into theological categories Sexuality in Eden, Outside the Garden, and Return to Eden are very signicant categories in the exploration of a consistent Old Testament theology of sexuality. Yael Klangwisan