Q , g/s H, m School A distance, m

200 100 1000

sigma_z sigma_y sigma_z
120 152.5540143 600
sigma_z sigma_y sigma_z
37.94733192 76.27700714 102.8991511
DAY, Stability Class B
NIGHT, Stability Class D
School A, Day
School B, Night School A, Night
School B, Day
DAY NIGHT
School B Distance, m u(10m), m/s u(100m), m/s u(100m), m/s
5000 4 4.69959022 5.650150178
sigma_y
653.1972647
sigma_y
326.5986324
g/m3 ug/m3
School A, SO2 Concen. 0.000523165 523.1651123
School B, SO2 Concen. 3.41046E-05 34.10459375
School A, SO2 Concen. 0.00012092 120.9201048
School B, SO2 Concen. 0.000209185 209.185076
School B, Night
School B, Day
C.)
School A decreased in concentration from day to night.
School B increased in concentration from day to night. School A
experienced a much higher concentration of SO
to School B which was much lower. This is mostly related to the distance
away the school's were from the plume and the stability of the
atmosphere in relation to the effective height of the plume. Because the
atmosphere was moderately unstable turbulence caused high level
ground concentrations from the plume "looping." School A experienced
the peak of the concentration at 1 km and School B was great reduced in
concentration at 5 km.
At night the atmospheric stability was neutral and
"coning" behavior is expected. A smaller plume is expected which is
indicted by the much smaller concentration at school A and school B.
School B had the much higher concentration
spreading down at the further distance. School A most likely experienced
the plume rising and therefore less concentration would be expected.
School A decreased in concentration from day to night.
School B increased in concentration from day to night. School A
experienced a much higher concentration of SO2 during the day compared
to School B which was much lower. This is mostly related to the distance
away the school's were from the plume and the stability of the
atmosphere in relation to the effective height of the plume. Because the
atmosphere was moderately unstable turbulence caused high level
ground concentrations from the plume "looping." School A experienced
the peak of the concentration at 1 km and School B was great reduced in
At night the atmospheric stability was neutral and
"coning" behavior is expected. A smaller plume is expected which is
indicted by the much smaller concentration at school A and school B.
School B had the much higher concentration SO2 and the plume was
spreading down at the further distance. School A most likely experienced
the plume rising and therefore less concentration would be expected.