The document discusses concerns about mining magnate Clive Palmer and his company Mineralogy's interactions with Aboriginal groups in Australia. It summarizes findings from court cases that show Palmer and his company have failed to act in good faith with indigenous groups, respect their land rights, and make promised investments in indigenous health. A key witness says Palmer broke past pledges and the company destroyed burial sites, did not properly consult with traditional owners about sacred sites, and were combative in their dealings with Aboriginal communities.
Original Description:
21st Century Aussie Digger Clive Palmer and his machinations with the locals.
The document discusses concerns about mining magnate Clive Palmer and his company Mineralogy's interactions with Aboriginal groups in Australia. It summarizes findings from court cases that show Palmer and his company have failed to act in good faith with indigenous groups, respect their land rights, and make promised investments in indigenous health. A key witness says Palmer broke past pledges and the company destroyed burial sites, did not properly consult with traditional owners about sacred sites, and were combative in their dealings with Aboriginal communities.
The document discusses concerns about mining magnate Clive Palmer and his company Mineralogy's interactions with Aboriginal groups in Australia. It summarizes findings from court cases that show Palmer and his company have failed to act in good faith with indigenous groups, respect their land rights, and make promised investments in indigenous health. A key witness says Palmer broke past pledges and the company destroyed burial sites, did not properly consult with traditional owners about sacred sites, and were combative in their dealings with Aboriginal communities.
Australian, The (Australia) - Thursday, May 1, 2014
Author: HEDLEY THOMAS, PAIGE TAYLOR
say their rights and culture have been trampled in his pursuit of mineral wealth on sacred sites. Multi-Print Viewer http://infoweb.newsbank.com.ezproxy.une.edu.au/iw-search/we/InfoWeb grave concern about the health and poverty of Aborigines. But an examination by The Australian of findings by magistrates in mining court and native title cases show his main company has failed to act in good faith, flouted rules, operated combatively, had little regard for indigenous landowners and may even have destroyed ancient burial sites. A key witness and senior member of the native title claim group whose evidence was accepted by the mining court, Mathew Sampi, said yesterday he had no confidence in Mr Palmer as the tycoon had broken past pledges to spend money on indigenous health. up fishing and hunting in the Cape Preston area near an iron ore project built by Chinese company CITIC Pacific. seemed real good in the beginning, saying he was going to help the Aboriginal people in the area. They destroyed a lot documents. Trumpeting the defection of the three indigenous MPs to his Palmer United Party this week, Mr Palmer appealed to indigenous voters to trust his commitment to reduce child deaths above other parties. Mr Sampi said yesterday that Mr Palmer told Aboriginal leaders he would establish health services in townships outside Mr Sampi, in Perth with his family yesterday for chemotherapy, said it was important to stand up for his land and he believed there were lessons for other Aborigines in his experience. According to one of the findings in 2012, compliance. owners of the land the company wanted to mine. Tribunal deputy president John Sosso found that Mineralogy had not acted prudently, reasonably or responsibly in its dealings with Aborigines. In a case involving the Kuruma Marthudundera group, elders Neil Ricky Finlay and Mr Sampi told the court of bad experiences with the company in the Pilbara region, which includes sacred burial grounds near the Cane River and the town of Karratha. 1 of 2 6/22/2014 8:52 AM done in the past and is worried about what they might do on their country and the damage that they may cause to their as to what would happen if (the company) was permitted to mine in the area. He tells the court that (Mineralogy) and the KM people have had many arguments over the years. He states that (Mineralogy) has never done proper heritage surveys with them and does not know where the (sacred and burial) sites are. Multi-Print Viewer http://infoweb.newsbank.com.ezproxy.une.edu.au/iw-search/we/InfoWeb waterholes, burial grounds, reliable bush tucker and hunting areas, and was of important historical and cultural value. Edition: Australian Section: TheNation Page: 1 Record Number: NEWSMMGLSTRY000112996956 Copyright, 2014, Nationwide News Pty Limited 2 of 2 6/22/2014 8:52 AM