Project Brief

The New Legaspi Airport

Master Plan
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Transportation and Communications
PHIL.J AC, Inc.
Topographic Features and
Potential Airport Sites (Option II)
Implications of Development
Strategy Option II
Because of topographic features, Eastern airspace
is rendered unusable
Completely Crosswind Runway will result if
Obstacle Clearance Requirements are satisfied
Located within Seismic Sensitive Areas due to
presence of active faults along Western Coast
Location of Faults
Implications of Development
Strategy Option III
Need to decommission the existing airport
Need to locate the airport not too far from
Legaspi City due to:
Observed Origin and Destination Desire Patterns
Requirement of emerging Metropolitan Legaspi
Scanning and Multi-objective Selection Process
identified two possible sites, namely :
Barangay Bariis, Legaspi City
Barangay Alobo, Daraga City
Location of Potential Sites
for the New Legaspi Airport
Summary of Implications
Option I : Impractical from the Financial and
Environmental Point of View
Option II : Not Technically Feasible
Option III : Technically Feasible and can be
pursued with minimum constraints
Comparison Between Bariis and Alobo
Criteria Alobo, Daraga City Bariis, Legaspi City
Estimated Cost
PhP 3.4 Billion PhP 4.3 Billion
Existing Land Use Rain-fed agricultural area
undergoing study for land
productivity improvement
Undulated Hill
Included in the National
Protected Areas for
Agricultural Development
and Strategic Crop
Development Zone
Accessibility to Legaspi
City
Approx. 20 mins from Legaspi
City
Approx. 50 mins from
Legaspi City
Comparison Between Bariis and Alobo
Criteria Alobo, Daraga City Bariis, Legaspi City
Possibility to establish
instrument flight
procedures
Obstacles penetrating
approach and northern inner
horizontal surfaces to be
removed but those
penetrating conical and
western inner horizontal
surface be untouched.
Obstacles penetrating the
conical surface be untouched
--Precision Approach from
-South
Possible without Restriction Possible without Restriction
- Departure to the north Possible without restriction Possible without restriction
- Departure to the south Possible but minimum climb
rate must be 4 %.
Possible without restriction
Comparison Between Bariis and Alobo
Criteria Alobo, Daraga City Bariis, Legaspi City
- Site Development
Estimated volume of
earthwork approximately 2
million cu.m for cut and fill
each
Excavated soils for obstacle
removal purpose will be
utilized for airport site
development.
Estimated volume of
earthwork approximately
4.7 million cu.m for cut and
fill each
Cut and fill will be balanced
within the site
- Access Road Development Construction of new access
road (1 km in length) and
improvement of existing
Barangay road by 1.5 km in
length required,
Estimated volume of total
earthwork approx. 0.1
million cu. m for cut and fill
each
Construction of new access
road (6km in length)
required,
Estimated volume of
earthwork 0.6 million cu. m
Comparison Between Bariis and Alobo
Criteria Alobo, Daraga City Bariis, Legaspi City
Estimated Total
Earthworks Volume
Approximately 2.1 million cu. m
for cut and fill each
Approximately 5.3 million
cu. mfor cut and fill each
Relocation of
Structures
There are around 20 Nipa
houses within the site,
presumably owned by farmers
or caretakers of the rice fields.
There are at least 50
households within the site
A relocation site for squatter
families from Legaspi City
and for families displaced
by the eruption of Mayon
Volcano is being developed
at the northern approach.
At least 150 families were
already relocated to this
place.
Comparison Between Bariis and Alobo
Criteria Alobo, Daraga City Bariis, Legaspi City
Possible Hazard from
Mayon Volcano
Located approximately
15 kms from the crater of
Mayon
Located approximately 27 kms
from the crater of Mayon
Lava and Pyroclastic
Flow Hazard
9 kms away from the
permanent danger zone
and outside the areas
prone to lava flow
21 kms away from the
permanent danger zone and
outside the areas prone to lava
flow
Horizontal Alignment of Facilities
General Facility Layout
Proposed Alignment of Airport
Access
Affected Barangays
Summary of Project Costs (ooo Pesos)
I. LOCAL DEVELOPMENT 75,000
II. CONSTRUCTION COST 2,170,359
1 General Requi rements 127,202
2 Ci vi l Works 1,085,209
3 Bui l di ng Works 347,778
4 Ai rport Uti l i ti es 252,719
5 Crash-Fi re-Rescue Faci l i ti es 78,543
6 Ai r Navi gati on Faci l i ti es 278,908
III. ENGINERING SERVICES 527,892
IV. CONTINGENCY 217,036
V. PRICE ESCALATION 76,633
VI. ADMINISTRATION COST 60,000
VII. VALUE ADDED TAX 312,692
VIII. TOTAL 3,439,612
Total
Cost
ITEM
Financial Evaluation
2% 3% 4%
Base Case (No Tariff Increase) Negative -3,734 -3,541 -3,365
20 % Annual Increase for 20 years Negative -677 -1,059 -1,343
22 % Annual Increase for 20 years 3.21% 788 717 -396
25 % Annual Increase for 20 years 7.04% 4,699 3,248 2,116
60 % Annual Increase for first 5 years Negative -1,604 -1,728 -1,912
80 % Annual Increase for first 5 years 3.70% 760 279 -656
800 % Increase at Opening Year Negative -1,638 -1,728 -1,791
Scenario
Financial
Internal
Rate of
Return
(IRR)
Net Present Value (NPV in million
Pesos) @ following discount rates:
Economic Evaluation
Primary Benefits
Travel Cost Savings.
Avoided Foreign Tourism Revenue Losses.
Avoided Domestic Tourism Revenue Losses.
Incremental Airport Revenue.
Sale and Development of Prime Urban Land.
Secondary Benefits
Employment During and After Construction.
Reduced Cost to Cargo.
Environmental Effects.
Salvage Value of the Existing Facilities.
Result of Economic Evaluation
ECONOMIC SCENARIO
NPV @ 15
% (PhP
Mi l l i on) B/C Rati o EIRR
Base Case 104.82 2.1 18.30%
Sl i ghtl y Adverse Condi ti ons
10 % Increase In Project Costs -65.36 1.9 13.00%
10 % Decrease in Project Benefits -74.52 1.9 12.50%
Moderatel y Adverse Condi ti ons
20 % Increase in Project Costs -235.54 1.8 8.20%
20 % Decrease in Project Benefits -256.51 1.7 5.90%
Extremel y Adverse Condi ti ons
Simultaneous 10 % Increase In Project
Costs and 10% Decrease in Benefits -244.7 1.7 7.30%
Simultaneous 20 % Increase In Project
Costs and 20% Decrease in Benefits
-596.87 1.4 Negative
End of Presentation
Thank You and Good Day !