This document lists 22 case doctrines from international law:
1. Treaties can be binding even without written form as long as they are agreed upon by parties under provisions of Vienna Convention. Exchange of notes can constitute an international agreement.
2. When interpreting treaties with conflicting official texts, the text agreed upon by parties as authoritative is followed.
3. Fundamental change in circumstances that determine parties to accept a treaty may allow termination or suspension of the treaty if obligations are radically transformed.
4. Even in a state of necessity, it is not grounds for terminating a treaty. Impossibility of performance may not be invoked for terminating a treaty resulting from the party's own breach.
This document lists 22 case doctrines from international law:
1. Treaties can be binding even without written form as long as they are agreed upon by parties under provisions of Vienna Convention. Exchange of notes can constitute an international agreement.
2. When interpreting treaties with conflicting official texts, the text agreed upon by parties as authoritative is followed.
3. Fundamental change in circumstances that determine parties to accept a treaty may allow termination or suspension of the treaty if obligations are radically transformed.
4. Even in a state of necessity, it is not grounds for terminating a treaty. Impossibility of performance may not be invoked for terminating a treaty resulting from the party's own breach.
This document lists 22 case doctrines from international law:
1. Treaties can be binding even without written form as long as they are agreed upon by parties under provisions of Vienna Convention. Exchange of notes can constitute an international agreement.
2. When interpreting treaties with conflicting official texts, the text agreed upon by parties as authoritative is followed.
3. Fundamental change in circumstances that determine parties to accept a treaty may allow termination or suspension of the treaty if obligations are radically transformed.
4. Even in a state of necessity, it is not grounds for terminating a treaty. Impossibility of performance may not be invoked for terminating a treaty resulting from the party's own breach.