Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Software Testing Paradigms Tutorial Cem Kaner
Software Testing Paradigms Tutorial Cem Kaner
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.
EIA-0113539 ITR/SY+PE “Improving the Education of Software Testers.” Any opinions, findings
and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF).
About Cem Kaner
Professor of Computer Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology
Career focus--improving software customer satisfaction and safety. I’ve
worked as a programmer, tester, writer, teacher, user interface designer,
software salesperson, organization development consultant, development
consultant, manager / director of almost all aspects of software development,
and as an attorney focusing on the law of software quality.
Senior author of: Testing Computer Software (1988; 2nd edition with Hung
Nguyen and Jack Falk,1993). This received the Award of Excellence in the
Society for Technical Communication’s Northern California Technical
Publications Competition. Bad Software: What To Do When Software Fails
(with David Pels, 1998). Ralph Nader called this book “a how-to book for
consumer protection in the Information Age.” and Lessons Learned in
Software Testing (with James Bach & Bret Pettichord, 2001).
B.A. in Arts & Sciences (Math, Philosophy);
Ph.D. in Experimental Psychology (Human Perception & Performance:
Psychophysics),
J.D. (law degree). Member of the American Law Institute.
• Function testing
• Domain testing
• Specification-based testing
• Risk-based testing
• Stress testing
• Regression testing
• User testing
• Scenario testing
• Exploratory testing
• Stochastic or Random testing
• <<combination testing>>
Test 1 X X X
Test 2 X X
Test 3 X X X
Test 4 X X
Test 5 X X
Test 6 X X
Function Testing
Domain Testing
number of digits or
Empty field (clear
the default value)
UB of value + 1
digits or chars
digits or chars
LB of value - 1
UB number of
Outside of UB
LB number of
UB of value
LB of value
Non-digits
Negative
Nothing
chars
0
This includes only the first few columns of a matrix that I’ve
used commercially, but it gets across the idea.
Specification-Based Testing
Risk-Based Testing
• Risk:
» Possibility of suffering loss or harm (probability of
an accident caused by a given hazard).
• Accident:
» A hazard is encountered, resulting in loss or
harm.
post-ship pre-ship
Paradigms:
Regression Testing
mines fixes
mines fixes
Copyright (c) 1994-2001 Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 124
GUI Regression Strategies:
Some Papers of Interest
• Chris Agruss, Automating Software Installation Testing
• James Bach, Test Automation Snake Oil
• Hans Buwalda, Testing Using Action Words
• Hans Buwalda, Automated testing with Action Words:
Abandoning Record & Playback
• Elisabeth Hendrickson, The Difference between Test
Automation Failure and Success
• Cem Kaner, Avoiding Shelfware: A Manager’s View of
Automated GUI Testing
• John Kent, Advanced Automated Testing Architectures
• Bret Pettichord, Success with Test Automation
• Bret Pettichord, Seven Steps to Test Automation Success
• Keith Zambelich, Totally Data-Driven Automated Testing
Exploratory Testing
Many of the ideas in these notes were reviewed and
extended by my colleagues at the 7th Los Altos
Workshop on Software Testing. I appreciate the
assistance of the other LAWST 7 attendees: Brian
Lawrence, III, Jack Falk, Drew Pritsker, Jim Bampos,
Bob Johnson, Doug Hoffman, Chris Agruss, Dave
Gelperin, Melora Svoboda, Jeff Payne, James
Tierney, Hung Nguyen, Harry Robinson, Elisabeth
Hendrickson, Noel Nyman, Bret Pettichord, &
Rodney Wilson.
Copyright (c) 1994-2001 Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 126
Doing Exploratory Testing
• Basic Hunches
» “Random”
» Similarity to previous errors
» Following up gossip and predictions
» Follow up recent changes
• Models
• Examples
• Invariances
• Interference
• Error Handling
• Troubleshooting
• Group Insights
• Specifications
• Examples
» Use cases
» Simple walkthroughs
» Positive testing
» Scenarios
» Soap operas
• Invariances
• Interference
• Error Handling
• Troubleshooting
• Group Insights
• Specifications
Copyright (c) 1994-2001 Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 149
Use Cases
• List the users of the system
• For each user, think through the tasks they want
to do
• Create test cases to reflect their simple and
complex uses of the system
• Try to get the program working in the way that the programmers
intended it.
• One of the points of this testing is that you educate yourself
about the program. You are looking at it and learning about it
from a sympathetic viewpoint, using it in a way that will show
you what the value of the program is.
• This is true “positive” testing—you are trying to make the
program show itself off, not just trying to confirm that all the
features and functions are there and kind of sort of working.
• Invariances
• Interference
• Error Handling
• Troubleshooting
• Group Insights
• Specifications
These are tests run by making changes that shouldn’t affect the
program. Examples:
• load fonts into a printer in different orders
• set up a page by sending text to the printer and then the drawn objects or
by sending the drawn objects and then the text
• use a large file, in a program that should be able to handle any size input
file (and see if the program processes it in the same way)
• mathematical operations in different but equivalent orders
===============
John Musa — Intro to his book, Reliable Software Engineering,
says that you should use different values within an equivalance
class. For example, if you are testing a flight reservation system
for two US cities, vary the cities. They shouldn’t matter, but
sometimes they do.
Examples:
Compete for a device (such as a printer)
• put device in use, then try to use it from software under test
• start using device, then use it from other software
• If there is a priority system for device access, use software
that has higher, same and lower priority access to the device
before and during attempted use by software under test
Compete for processor attention
• some other process generates an interrupt (e.g. ring into the
modem, or a time-alarm in your contact manager)
• try to do something during heavy disk access by another
process
Send this process another job while one is underway
• Error Handling
• Troubleshooting
• Group Insights
• Specifications
• Stress / volume (huge files, too many files, tasks, devices, fields,
records, etc.)
• Troubleshooting
• Group Insights
• Specifications
Also, the fact that two are working together limits the
willingness of others to interrupt them, especially with
administrivia.
• Specifications
» Active reading -- Ambiguity analysis
» User manual
» Consistency heuristics
Paradigms:
Scenario Testing
Combination Testing
The
Netscape
Preferences
dialog.
Followed NE
variables in
Links DU
combination. Here
are some examples,
from a combination
table. Test #1 P Y Y Y B D N
2 P Y Y N B D E
3 P Y N Y B U N
4 P Y N N B U E
5 P Y Y Y V D N
6 P Y Y N V D E
7 P N N Y V U N
8 P N N N V U E
9 P N Y Y E D N
10 P N Y N E D E
11 P N N Y E U N
12 P N N N E U E
Copyright (c) 1994-2001 Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 200
Here are the 288 test cases. Every value of every variable is
combined with every combination of the other variables.
1 P Y Y Y B D N P N Y Y B D N T Y Y Y B D N T N Y Y B D N B Y Y Y B D N B N Y Y B D N
2 P Y Y Y V D E P N Y Y V D E T Y Y Y V D E T N Y Y V D E B Y Y Y V D E B N Y Y V D E
3 P Y Y Y E D N P N Y Y E D N T Y Y Y E D N T N Y Y E D N B Y Y Y E D N B N Y Y E D N
4 P Y Y Y B U E P N Y Y B U E T Y Y Y B U E T N Y Y B U E B Y Y Y B U E B N Y Y B U E
5 P Y Y Y V U N P N Y Y V U N T Y Y Y V U N T N Y Y V U N B Y Y Y V U N B N Y Y V U N
6 P Y Y Y E U E P N Y Y E U E T Y Y Y E U E T N Y Y E U E B Y Y Y E U E B N Y Y E U E
7 P Y Y N B D N P N Y N B D N T Y Y N B D N T N Y N B D N B Y Y N B D N B N Y N B D N
8 P Y Y N V D E P N Y N V D E T Y Y N V D E T N Y N V D E B Y Y N V D E B N Y N V D E
9 P Y Y N E D N P N Y N E D N T Y Y N E D N T N Y N E D N B Y Y N E D N B N Y N E D N
1 0 P Y Y N B U E P N Y N B U E T Y Y N B U E T N Y N B U E B Y Y N B U E B N Y N B U E
1 1 P Y Y N V U N P N Y N V U N T Y Y N V U N T N Y N V U N B Y Y N V U N B N Y N V U N
1 2 P Y Y N E U E P N Y N E U E T Y Y N E U E T N Y N E U E B Y Y N E U E B N Y N E U E
1 3 P Y Y Y B D E P N Y Y B D E T Y Y Y B D E T N Y Y B D E B Y Y Y B D E B N Y Y B D E
1 4 P Y Y Y V D N P N Y Y V D N T Y Y Y V D N T N Y Y V D N B Y Y Y V D N B N Y Y V D N
1 5 P Y Y Y E D E P N Y Y E D E T Y Y Y E D E T N Y Y E D E B Y Y Y E D E B N Y Y E D E
1 6 P Y Y Y B U N P N Y Y B U N T Y Y Y B U N T N Y Y B U N B Y Y Y B U N B N Y Y B U N
1 7 P Y Y Y V U E P N Y Y V U E T Y Y Y V U E T N Y Y V U E B Y Y Y V U E B N Y Y V U E
1 8 P Y Y Y E U N P N Y Y E U N T Y Y Y E U N T N Y Y E U N B Y Y Y E U N B N Y Y E U N
1 9 P Y Y N B D E P N Y N B D E T Y Y N B D E T N Y N B D E B Y Y N B D E B N Y N B D E
2 0 P Y Y N V D N P N Y N V D N T Y Y N V D N T N Y N V D N B Y Y N V D N B N Y N V D N
2 1 P Y Y N E D E P N Y N E D E T Y Y N E D E T N Y N E D E B Y Y N E D E B N Y N E D E
2 2 P Y Y N B U N P N Y N B U N T Y Y N B U N T N Y N B U N B Y Y N B U N B N Y N B U N
2 3 P Y Y N V U E P N Y N V U E T Y Y N V U E T N Y N V U E B Y Y N V U E B N Y N V U E
2 4 P Y Y N E U N P N Y N E U N T Y Y N E U N T N Y N E U N B Y Y N E U N B N Y N E U N
2 5 P Y N Y B D E P N N Y B D E T Y N Y B D E T N N Y B D E B Y N Y B D E B N N Y B D E
2 6 P Y N Y V D N P N N Y V D N T Y N Y V D N T N N Y V D N B Y N Y V D N B N N Y V D N
2 7 P Y N Y E D E P N N Y E D E T Y N Y E D E T N N Y E D E B Y N Y E D E B N N Y E D E
2 8 P Y N Y B U N P N N Y B U N T Y N Y B U N T N N Y B U N B Y N Y B U N B N N Y B U N
2 9 P Y N Y V U E P N N Y V U E T Y N Y V U E T N N Y V U E B Y N Y V U E B N N Y V U E
3 0 P Y N Y E U N P N N Y E U N T Y N Y E U N T N N Y E U N B Y N Y E U N B N N Y E U N
3 1 P Y N N B D E P N N N B D E T Y N N B D E T N N N B D E B Y N N B D E B N N N B D E
3 2 P Y N N V D N P N N N V D N T Y N N V D N T N N N V D N B Y N N V D N B N N N V D N
3 3 P Y N N E D E P N N N E D E T Y N N E D E T N N N E D E B Y N N E D E B N N N E D E
3 4 P Y N N B U N P N N N B U N T Y N N B U N T N N N B U N B Y N N B U N B N N N B U N
3 5 P Y N N V U E P N N N V U E T Y N N V U E T N N N V U E B Y N N V U E B N N N V U E
3 6 P Y N N E U N P N N N E U N T Y N N E U N T N N N E U N B Y N N E U N B N N N E U N
3 7 P Y N Y B D N P N N Y B D N T Y N Y B D N T N N Y B D N B Y N Y B D N B N N Y B D N
3 8 P Y N Y V D E P N N Y V D E T Y N Y V D E T N N Y V D E B Y N Y V D E B N N Y V D E
3 9 P Y N Y E D N P N N Y E D N T Y N Y E D N T N N Y E D N B Y N Y E D N B N N Y E D N
4 0 P Y N Y B U E P N N Y B U E T Y N Y B U E T N N Y B U E B Y N Y B U E B N N Y B U E
4 1 P Y N Y V U N P N N Y V U N T Y N Y V U N T N N Y V U N B Y N Y V U N B N N Y V U N
4 2 P Y N Y E U E P N N Y E U E T Y N Y E U E T N N Y E U E B Y N Y E U E B N N Y E U E
4 3 P Y N N B D N P N N N B D N T Y N N B D N T N N N B D N B Y N N B D N B N N N B D N
4 4 P Y N N V D E P N N N V D E T Y N N V D E T N N N V D E B Y N N V D E B N N N V D E
4 5 P Y N N E D N P N N N E D N T Y N N E D N T N N N E D N B Y N N E D N B N N N E D N
4 6 P Y N N B U E P N N N B U E T Y N N B U E T N N N B U E B Y N N B U E B N N N B U E
4 7 P Y N N V U N P N N N V U N T Y N N V U N T N N N V U N B Y N N V U N B N N N V U N
4 8 P Y N N E U E P N N N E U E T Y N N E U E T N N N E U E B Y N N E U E B N N N E U E
Followed
Toolbars
Browser
TOTAL
PAIRS
B/V/E
News
Links
P/T/B
Start
D/U
Mail
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
N/E
Toolbars ------ 6 6 6 9 6 6 39
3 choices
Browser ------ ------ 4 4 6 4 4 22
2 choices
Mail ------ ------ ------ 4 6 4 4 18
2 choices
News ------ ------ ------ ------ 6 4 4 14
2 choices
Start ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 6 6 12
3 choices
Links ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 4 4
2 choices ------
Followed ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 109
2 choices
Toolbars PTB
Followed NE
that combine all variables
at once, and that assure
Links DU
that every value of every
variable is paired with
every other value of every Test #1 P Y Y Y B D N
other variable. 2 P Y N N V D E
Each of these test cases 3 P N Y Y E U E
covers 21 pairs. In 4 T Y N Y E U N
5 T N Y N B D E
general, each test case 6 T N N Y V D N
that combines N variables 7 B Y N N B U E
includes N (N-1) / 2 pairs 8 B N Y Y V U E
9 B N N N E D N
Copyright (c) 1994-2001 Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 204
Combinations Exercise
B X
B Y
C X
C Y
variable 2.
C X
• Suppose variable 2 can be 1,0
C Y
• The third section can be filled in either way, and you
might highlight it so that you can reverse it later. The
decision (say 1,0) is arbitrary.
A X 1 E G I A X 1 E G I
A Y 0 F H J A Y 0 F H J
B X 0 F G J B X 0 F G I
B Y 1 E H I B Y 1 E H J
C X 1 F H J C X 1 F H J
C Y 0 E G I C Y 0 E G I