74 North Street w Guildford GU1 4AW w United Kingdom
Tel +44 (0) 1483 400900 w Fax +44 (0) 1483 400909 w http://www.wfinet.com GPRS RF Design and Optimisation November 2001 Version 1.0 GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 1 Executive Summary This report endeavors to give a guideline to optimise a GPRS network. There are different scenarios in which GPRS services are required. One that requires a new design of a GSM network having the GPRS services in mind and the other a migration from an existing GSM to GPRS network. The densed urban area of Paris is taken as an example for this study. As a result a link budget is created for this design and two coverage scenarios are created which shows the need for optimisation of such a network. Finally for capacity dimensioning has been carried out to show the capacity calculations and assumptions for such a network. GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 2 Document History Version Prepared by Edited by Date Modifications (Do not Write in this section) V1.0 Hilda Correia Payam Taaghol 11/13/01 Luis Rivilla Maseeh Azhand Mo Eskici Ravi Govindasamy Sasan Fahim Lauro Ortigoza Hedayat Azad GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 3 1 Abbreviations............................................................................................................. 5 2 Introduction and Background .................................................................................. 8 2.1 WHAT IS GPRS?..................................................................................................... 8 2.2 GPRS ARCHITECTURE............................................................................................ 9 2.3 NETWORK ELEMENTS OF THE BASE STATION SYSTEM (BSS)................................ 10 2.3.1 Base station controllers (BSC) ..................................................................... 10 2.3.2 Base transceiver stations (BTS)................................................................... 10 2.4 NETWORK ELEMENTS OF THE GPRS SWITCHING SUBSYSTEM (GSS).................... 10 2.4.1 Serving GPRS support node (SGSN) .......................................................... 10 2.4.2 Gateway GPRS support node (GGSN)........................................................ 11 2.4.3 Home location register (HLR) (for GPRS PLMN)......................................... 11 2.4.4 Authentication center (AC)............................................................................ 11 2.4.5 Visitor location register (VLR)....................................................................... 11 2.5 MOBILE STATION FOR GPRS................................................................................. 12 2.5.1 Class-A.......................................................................................................... 12 2.5.2 Class-B.......................................................................................................... 12 2.5.3 Class-C ......................................................................................................... 12 2.6 INTERNAL GPRS PLMN INTERFACES.................................................................... 12 2.6.1 Abis-interface................................................................................................ 12 2.6.2 Gb-interface.................................................................................................. 13 2.6.3 Gd-interface.................................................................................................. 13 2.6.4 Gf-interface................................................................................................... 13 2.6.5 Gn-interface.................................................................................................. 13 2.6.6 Gp-interface.................................................................................................. 13 2.6.7 Gr-interface................................................................................................... 13 2.6.8 Gs-interface.................................................................................................. 13 2.7 EXTERNAL GPRS PLMN INTERFACES................................................................... 14 2.7.1 Gi-interface (GPRS PLMN to Internet) ......................................................... 14 2.8 THE TRANSMISSION PLANE.................................................................................... 14 2.8.1 Signaling Plane ............................................................................................. 15 2.9 THE AIR INTERFACE............................................................................................... 16 2.9.1 Physical Layer............................................................................................... 16 2.9.2 Medium Access Control................................................................................ 19 2.9.3 Radio Resource Management...................................................................... 19 2.9.4 Mobility Management.................................................................................... 19 2.10 GPRS OPERATION................................................................................................ 20 2.10.1 Mobile Originated Packet Transfer............................................................... 21 2.10.2 Mobile Terminated Packet Transfer ............................................................. 22 2.11 WHERE IS GPRS NOW? ........................................................................................ 23 3 GPRS Radio Design and Optimisation Methodology.......................................... 28 3.1 VISIBILITY OF NETWORK PERFORMANCE................................................................. 29 3.2 UNKNOWN SERVICE REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................... 29 3.3 DESIGN CASES...................................................................................................... 30 3.3.1 New GSM Network Design with GPRS........................................................ 30 3.3.2 Migration from GSM to GPRS network......................................................... 31 4 GPRS Link Budgets................................................................................................. 32 4.1 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PATH LOSS......................................................................... 34 4.2 CELL SIZE ESTIMATION.......................................................................................... 35 4.3 CELL COUNT ESTIMATION...................................................................................... 36 5 Considerations in the GPRS link budgets............................................................ 37 GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 4 5.1 RX SENSITIVITY VS CODING SCHEME..................................................................... 37 5.2 BODY LOSS ........................................................................................................... 37 5.3 2 DB C/I DEGRADATION IN THE DOWNLINK............................................................. 38 5.4 CODING SCHEMES VS CLUTTERS .......................................................................... 38 6 Coverage Analysis ................................................................................................... 39 6.1 COVERAGE CASE STUDY 1..................................................................................... 39 6.1.1 GSM Coverage for Paris within the periphery area...................................... 39 6.1.2 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS1...................... 41 6.1.3 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS2...................... 43 6.1.4 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS3...................... 45 6.1.5 GPRS coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS4..................... 47 6.2 COVERAGE CASE STUDY 2 .................................................................................... 49 6.2.1 GSM Coverage for Paris within the periphery area with 240 sites .............. 49 6.2.2 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS1 with 240 sites51 6.2.3 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS2 with 240 sites53 6.2.4 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS3 with 240 sites55 6.2.5 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS4 with 240 sites57 7 Capacity Dimensioning ........................................................................................... 59 7.1 NETWORK PERFORMANCE..................................................................................... 61 7.1.1 Peak Throughput........................................................................................... 61 7.2 SYSTEM C/I PROFILE AND MEAN DATA RATE PER CHANNEL .................................. 63 7.2.1 Latency.......................................................................................................... 65 8 Capacity case study................................................................................................. 67 8.1 CASE ONE: ADDING TRXS WITHOUT CONSIDERING DEDICATED TSLS TO GPRS USERS............................................................................................................................. 67 8.1.1 GPRS migration............................................................................................ 68 8.2 CASE TWO: ADDING TRXS WITH CONSIDERING TWO DEDICATED TSLS TO GPRS USERS............................................................................................................................. 69 8.2.1 GPRS migration............................................................................................ 70 8.3 CASE THREE: ADDING NEW SITES WITH CONSIDERING TWO DEDICATED TSLS TO GPRS USERS ................................................................................................................. 71 8.3.1 GPRS migration............................................................................................ 71 9 Mobiles availability................................................................................................... 72 9.1 WORLDWIDE GPRS TERMINALS AND HANDSETS................................................... 72 GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 5 1 Abbreviations ABC Administration and Billing Centre AC Authentication Centre AGCH Access Grant Channel APN Access Point Name ASN ATM Switching Network BCT Basic Craft Terminal BER Bit Error Rate BVC BSSGP Virtual Connection BVCI BSSGP Virtual Connection Identifier AMX ATM Multiplexer ATM Asynchronous Transfer Mode CCU Channel Coding Unit CCCH Common Control Channel CS Coding Schemes CT Craft Terminal BG Border Gateway BSS Base Station System BSSAP Base Station System Application Part BSSGP Base Station System GPRS Protocol BSSMAP Base Station System Management Application Part BSC Base Station Controller BTS Base Transceiver Station CCS7 Common Channel Signalling System No. 7 (equal to SS7) DLCI Data Link Connection Identifier EIR Equipment Identification Register ETSI European Telecommunications Standards Institute EWSD Elektronisches Whlsystem Digital EWSX Elektronisches Whlsystem Express FR Frame Relay FTP File Transfer Protocol GGSN Gateway GPRS Support Node GR GPRS Register GPRS General Packet Radio Service GSM Global system for mobile communication GSN GPRS Support Node GTP GPRS Tunnelling Protocol GTT Global Title Translation HDLC High Level Data Link Control protocol HLR Home Location Register HO Handover HSCSD High Speed Circuit Switched Data IANA Internet Assigned Numbers Authority ID Identifier IF Interface IMSI International Mobile Subscriber Identity IP Internet Protocol IPv4 Internet Protocol version 4 IPv6 Internet Protocol version 6 GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 6 ISP Internet Service Provider LA Location Area LAN Local Area Network LIC Line Interface Controller LLC Logical Link Control MAC Media Access Control MAP Mobile Application Part MM Mobility Management MP Main Processor MP:PD Main Processor for Packet Dispatching MP:SA Main Processor with Standalone Capabilities MS Mobile Station MSC Mobil Switching Centre MT Mobile Terminated NS-VC Network Service Virtual Connection NS-VCI Network Service Virtual Connection Identifier NS-VL Network Service Virtual Link NUC Nailed Up Connections O&M Operation and Maintenance OMC Operation and Maintenance Centre OMC-S OMC-Switching Subsystem OS Operation System PAGCH Packet Access Grant Channel PCM Pulse Code Modulation PCU Packet Control Unit PCCCH Packet Common Control Channel PDTCH Packet Data Channel PDN Packet Data Network PDP Packet Data Protocol, e.g. IP or X.25 PDU Protocol Data Unit PLMN Public Land Mobile Network PRACH Packet Random Access Channel PSPDN Packet-Switched Private Data Networks PTM Point To Multipoint PTP Point To Point PTP-CLNS Point To Point - Connection Less Network Service PTP-CONS Point To Point - Connection Oriented Network Service PVC Permanent Virtual Connection P-TMSI Packet - Temporary Mobile Subscriber Identity QoS Quality of Service RA Routing Area RIP Routing Information Protocol RLC Radio Link Control RSS Radio Subsystem SDU Service Data Unit SGSN Serving GPRS Support Node SM Short Message SM-SC Short Message Service Centre SMS-GMSC Short Message Service Gateway MSC SMS-IWMSC Short Message Service Interworking MSC SSNC Signalling System Network Control GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 7 SSS Switching Subsystem STP Signalling Transfer Point TE Terminal Equipment TCH Traffic Channel UDI Unrestricted Digital Information UMTS Universal Mobile Telecommunication System VCI Virtual Channel or Circuit Identifier VLR Visited Location Register VPI Virtual Path Identifier WAN Wide Area Network GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 8 2 Introduction and Background Life styles are changing rapidly and subscribers, including individuals, businesses and corporate users alike, are expecting more mobile services. Ordering cinema tickets wirelessly, accessing up-to-date traffic information from your car, or viewing video clips of the latest news will soon become common events in everyday life. For corporate users, accessing corporate intranets and downloading files quickly and efficiently will become essential business skills. The data application opportunities for business and industry are diverse, including remote equipment management, location identification for transportation companies, and remote information access for mobile workers. Mobile data technology affords added value to life styles and business processes leading to enhanced productivity, reduced costs and an overall increase in efficiency. The Internet has become a critical resource for millions of people worldwide, with many individuals doing their shopping on-line, and corporations sharing information and communicating around the globe via their corporate intranets. The explosive demand for mobile communications and the tremendous growth of the Internet present an exciting opportunity for GSM operators to capture new markets by provisioning a variety of exciting new data applications. GPRS solution, easy access to high-speed data packet services is easily achieved, enabling operators to respond quickly to market demands. GPRS also presents cost implications as users are likely to pay a monthly charge or pay for the quantity of the data they transfer rather than current billing-by-minute basis of todays GSM network. For people who want to stay on-line for long periods of time and use devices for Internet browsing, GPRS will almost certainly be cheaper. 2.1 What is GPRS? GPRS is a packet switched data service in GSM for mobile access to the Internet and other packet data networks (PDN). It provides higher user data rates by using traffic channel combining and different coding schemes. GPRS allows the service subscriber to send and receive data in an end-to-end transfer mode without utilizing network resources in circuit switched mode. Resources are used only in case of data transmission. This allows volume-dependent charging; i.e. the user only pays for the transferred data. The GPRS system provides a basic solution for Internet Protocol (IP) communication between Mobile Stations and Internet Service Hosts (IH) and provides: efficient use of scarce radio resources a flexible service, with volume-based (or session duration-based) charging fast set-up/access time GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 9 efficient transport of packets in the GSM network simultaneous GSM and GPRS, co-existence without disturbance connectivity to other external packet data networks, using the Internet Protocol. 2.2 GPRS Architecture Packet-orienting functionality requires some new network elements. GPRS is logically implemented on the GSM structure through the addition of two network nodes, the Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) and the Gateway GPRS Support Node (GGSN). Fig 1 shows the overview of the GPRS logical architecture. Fig 1: The overview of the GPRS logical architecture. In addition to adding multiple GPRS nodes and a GPRS backbone, some other technical changes need to be added to a GSM network to implement a GPRS service. These include the addition of Packet Control Units (PCU); often hosted in the Base Station GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 10 Subsystems (BSS), mobility management to locate the GPRS Mobile Station (MS), a new air interface for packet traffic, new security features such as ciphering and new GPRS specific signaling. 2.3 Network Elements of the Base Station System (BSS) 2.3.1 Base station controllers (BSC) The BSCs form the intelligent part of the BSS. They handle the most important BSS control functions. They also perform the radio processing functions such as management of the radio resources, radio channel management, local connection management and safeguarding functions. One or more BSCs are linked to a MSC. For GPRS support the BSC has to be completed with the new hardware unit, known as a packet control unit (PCU). Furthermore in the BTS new software functionality has to be completed, called channel codec units (CCU). The packet control unit (PCU) is logical part of the BSC. The PCU provides interworking between the network side of the GPRS system and the radio side. In particular it performs the radio specific function of the GPRS operation. That is, it requests the radio resources from the BSC, manages the sub-multiplexing of multiple GPRS-MS on one physical channel and performs the automatic repeat request (ARQ) protocol to guarantee a reliable link to the GPRS-MS. Furthermore it supports layer 1 protocols (frame relay) via the Gb-interface in the direction to the SGSN. Like the TRAU, the PCU can be located near (or into) the BSC as well as the SGSN. 2.3.2 Base transceiver stations (BTS) The PCU function in the BSC is completed by more channel codec units (CCU) in the BTS, which is realized as a software function. The software function CCU performs channel coding, including forward error correction (FEC) and interleaving included. Furthermore it performs radio channel measurements and mapping of GPRS and signaling onto the Abis interface in the direction to BSC. 2.4 Network Elements of the GPRS Switching Subsystem (GSS) The GSS consists of (or involves) the following network elements: - the serving GPRS support node (SGSN) - the gateway GPRS support node (GGSN) - the home location register (HLR) - the authentication center (AC) - the visitor location register (VLR) These network elements are described in detail below. 2.4.1 Serving GPRS support node (SGSN) The SGSN is the GPRS node that serves the GPRS-MS. It can be compared with the MSC/VLR in case of circuit-switched connections. The SGSN knows the location of the GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 11 GPRS-MS, its states, the supported packet data protocol(s) and the corresponding GGSN. It is mainly responsible for access control, mobility management and packet data protocol activation. Regarding the user packet data transfer it maintains a tunnel toward the corresponding GGSN. 2.4.2 Gateway GPRS support node (GGSN) The GGSN is the GPRS node that performs interworking with the external packet network. It is comparable with the combination of a gateway MSC and a part of the HLR. It knows the address of the SGSN where the mobile is logged on and processes the packet data protocols that are supported by the GPRS network. It is able to access Public Data Networks such as IP and X.25. On the other hand the GGSN forwards the packets of the external packet data protocols by using the GPRS tunneling protocol GTP to the related SGSN where the destination user resides. Therefore the GGSN holds a GPRS specific routing table which is updated by the GPRS mobility management information also provided by the GTP. The GGSN can assign dynamic packet data protocol addresses. 2.4.3 Home location register (HLR) (for GPRS PLMN) The subscriber record is extended by the subscription information for GPRS, which contains the GPRS subscription, itself and a set of the allowed packet data protocol/address pairs. A packet data protocol (PDP) address pair is qualified by the assigned GGSN address, quality of service (QoS) and screening parameters. For the purpose of mobility management the HLR holds the current SGSN address. In a first approach of ETSI standardization of GPRS the GPRS mobile subscriber database was named GPRS register (GR). This logical GR was then integrated into the HLR, which represents a unified home location register for GSM subscriber and GPRS mobile subscriber. Thus the HLR holds the GPRS mobile subscriber data for the purpose of GPRS. Although the HLR is part of the GSM PLMN the GPRS mobile subscriber data has to be considered as an extension of the subscriber data record of a GSM subscriber. The HLR is connected to the SGSN via the Gr-interface. 2.4.4 Authentication center (AC) The authentication center (AC) of the GSM PLMN is also used for subscriber authentication of GPRS mobile subscriber. It is connected to the SGSN via the Gr- interface. 2.4.5 Visitor location register (VLR) With GPRS a PLMN operator can provide a new packet oriented network transfer in addition to the existing circuit-switched network services for data applications. The network resources can be used more efficiently by a "combined mobility management" of the packet oriented GPRS network and the circuit-switched GSM network by introducing the Gs-interface. The interface has to be supported by the MSC/VLR node and the SGSN. The Gs-interface connects the databases in the MSC/VLR and the SGSN in order to co-ordinate the location information of a mobile station that is attached to both GSM and GPRS services. GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 12 2.5 Mobile station for GPRS According to their capability with respect to parallel operation of circuit-switched and packet-oriented (GPRS); three classes of GPRS mobile stations (GPRS-MS) are de- fined: 2.5.1 Class-A Simultaneous and independent execution of signaling as well as traffic for both circuit- switched and packet-oriented (GPRS) operation is possible. Therefore the class-A MS uses two independent receiver/transmitters. The class-A MS is a typical high end MS. 2.5.2 Class-B Simultaneous execution of signaling for both circuit-switched and packet-oriented (GPRS) operation is possible. The GPRS traffic will be suspended in case of a pending or established circuit-switched connection. The class-B MS is a typical all-purpose mobile. 2.5.3 Class-C Alternate use of circuit-switched and packet-oriented (GPRS) operation is possible. The MS supports either packet-oriented (GPRS) operation only or both circuit-switched and packet-oriented (GPRS) operation. In the latter case only one service at time is available by default or manual preselection. That means at one time a class-C MS is either a GPRS-MS or a non GPRS-MS. The class-C MS with exclusive GPRS capability is a typical low-cost mobile. 2.6 Internal GPRS PLMN Interfaces 2.6.1 Abis-interface The Abis-interface is the interface from the BSC to the BTS known from non-GPRS operation. For GPRS purposes the signaling part of the Abis-interface is slightly modified with respect to message contents and message flow. The traffic data (and dedicated GPRS signaling) are transferred by TRAU frames, which include the measurement and physical information. Examples of the functions for GPRS-MS implemented at the Abis-interface are as follows: - transfer of GPRS data and RLC/MAC associated signaling information via 16 kbit/s channels - transfer of PCU frames, which are an extension of existing TRAU frames - logical multiplexing in LAPD channels between BTS and BSC via sent RLC/MAC signaling over separate control channels GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 13 2.6.2 Gb-interface The Gb-interface is the interface of the SGSN and BSC (PCU). It consists of permanent virtual connections (PVCs) which carry packet and signaling data simultaneously. It is also possible to connect the SGSN and the BSS via an MSC using nailed-up connections (NUCs) or point-to-point connections. The BSSGP protocol on top of frame relay (FR) is used to transfer these data. For communication between the SGSN and the BSS, the BSS GPRS protocol (BSSGP) is used. This protocol is handled between two peer BSSGP entities, one in the BSS and one in the SGSN. They exchange data via virtual connections, so-called BSSGP virtual connections (BVCs), which are defined between the SGSN and each BTS (radio cell) of the BSS and additionally between the SGSN and a BSS for signaling purposes. 2.6.3 Gd-interface The Gd-interface is the interface between SGSN and the SMS-GMSC/SMS-IWMSC. 2.6.4 Gf-interface The Gf-interface is the interface between SGSN and the Equipment Identity Register (EIR). 2.6.5 Gn-interface The Gn-interface is the interface between SGSN and GGSN as well as SGSN and SGSN of the own network. It is used to transfer the packet data and control information inside the GPRS network by use of the GPRS tunneling protocol (GTP) which runs on top of the user datagram protocol (UDP) of the Internet protocol (IP) protocol stack. 2.6.6 Gp-interface The Gp-interface represents the logical interface between two GPRS PLMN operators. It may be a direct connection or a connection with help of transport network. The protocol layer is identical with that of the Gn interface. 2.6.7 Gr-interface The Gr-interface represents the interface between the SGSN and the HLR/AC which holds the GPRS register. It is used to transfer subscription, authentication and location information by means of the MAP. 2.6.8 Gs-interface The Gs-interface describes the logical interface between the SGSN and the MSC/VLR. It is used to transfer mobility management information. GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 14 2.7 External GPRS PLMN Interfaces 2.7.1 Gi-interface (GPRS PLMN to Internet) The Gi-interface is the interface of the GGSN and the external packet data network (PDN, i.e. Internet). There are several incarnations of that interface according to the connected PDN. It is possible that a single GGSN keeps connections to different external PDN (e.g. public Internet, private Intranets). 2.8 The Transmission Plane The transmission plane consists of a layered protocol structure providing user information transfer, along with associated information transfer control procedures (e.g., flow control, error detection, error correction and error recovery). The transmission plane independence of the Network Subsystem (NSS) platform from the underlying radio interface is preserved via the Gb interface. The following transmission plane is used in GPRS, as shown in Fig. 2: IP TID TID MS Um BSS Gb SGSN Gn GGSN Gi Fig.2: Transmission plane Application IP/X.25 SNDCP LLC RLC MAC GSM PL LLC Relay RLC BSSGP SNDCP LLC BSSGP Frame Relay L1bis GTP IP L2 L1 IP/X.25 GTP IP L2 L1 MAC GSM Frame Relay L1bis TLLI GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 15 Between two GSNs, the GPRS Tunneling Protocol (GTP) tunnels user data and signaling through the GPRS backbone network by adding routing information. All Point to Point (PTP) Packet Data Protocol (PDP) and Protocol Data Units (PDUs) are encapsulated by the GPRS Tunneling Protocol. Below the GTP, the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram Protocol (UDP) respectively, carries GTP PDUs in the GPRS backbone network for protocols that need a reliable data link (e.g., X.25) and those that do not need a reliable data link (e.g., IP). TCP provides flow control and protection against lost and corrupted GTP PDUs. UDP provides protection against corrupted GTP PDUs. IP is the GPRS backbone network protocol used for routing user data and control signaling. Ethernet, ISDN, or asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) based protocols may be used below IP depending on the operator's architecture. Between the SGSN and the MS, the Sub-network Dependent Convergence Protocol (SNDCP): maps network-level characteristics onto the characteristics of the underlying network. It also provides functionalities like multiplexing of network-layer messages onto a single virtual logical connection, encryption, segmentation, and compression. As for the data link layer functionality, between the MS and the BSS, the data link layer has been separated into two distinct sublayers, the Logical Link Control (LLC) and the radio link control (RLC)/medium access control (MAC). The LLC layer provides a highly reliable ciphered logical link between the MS and the SGSN. Protocol functionality is based on link access procedure-D (LAPD) used within the GSM signaling plane with support for PTM transmission. The RLC/MAC layer contains two functions. The RLC function provides a radio-solution- dependent reliable link. The MAC function controls the access signaling (request and grant) procedures for the radio channel, and the mapping of LLC frames onto the GSM physical channel. The GSM physical layer (GSM PL) is split up into a physical link sublayer (PLL) and a physical RF sublayer (RFL). The PLL provides services for information transfer over a physical channel between the MS and the network. These functions include data unit framing, data coding and the detection and correction of physical medium transmission errors. The PLL uses the services of the physical RFL. The PLL is responsible for forward error correction (FEC) coding allowing detection and correction errors in transmitted code-words and the signaling of uncorrectable code- words, rectangular interleaving of one radio block over four bursts in consecutive TDMA frames and, procedures for detecting physical link congestion. The RFL is part of a complete GSM system that delivers a range of services including GPRS. The RFL performs the modulation and demodulation of the physical waveforms and conforms to the GSM 05 series of recommendations. In the network, the LLC is split between the BSS and the SGSN. In the BSS, this function relays LLC PDUs between the Um and Gb interfaces. In the SGSN, this function relays PDP PDUs between the Gb and Gn interfaces. Between BSS and SGSN, Base Station System GPRS Protocol (BSSGP) conveys routing and QoS -related information. BSSGP does not perform error correction. 2.8.1 Signaling Plane The signaling plane consists of protocols for control and support of the transmission plane functions. Some of these functions deal with controlling the GPRS network access connections (such as attaching to and detaching from the GPRS network) and controlling the attributes of an established network access connection (such as activation of a PDP address). Other functions include controlling the routing path of an GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 16 established network connection in order to support user mobility; and controlling the assignment of network resources to meet changing user demands; and providing supplementary services. Fig. 3 shows the signaling plane between MS and SGSN. GPRS Mobility Management and Session Management (GMM/SM) is a protocol that supports mobility management functionality such as GPRS attach, GPRS detach, security, routing area update, location update, PDP context activation, and PDP context deactivation. Ms Um BSS Gb SGSN Fig.3: Signaling plane MS-SGSN 2.9 The Air Interface The air interface design of GSM-GPRS allows a GPRS MS to access and obtain service from a GPRS-network. The air interface protocol is concerned with communications between MS and BSS at the physical, MAC, and RLC protocol layers. The RLC/MAC sublayer allows efficient multi-user multiplexing on the shared packet data channel(s) (PDCH) and utilizes a selective ARQ protocol for reliable transmissions across the air interface. 2.9.1 Physical Layer The physical channel dedicated to packet data traffic is called a packet data channel (PDCH). A cell that supports GPRS may allocate one or more shared PDCHs, which are taken from the common pool of physical channels available to the cell and otherwise used as traffic channels (TCHs). The allocation of TCHs and PDCHs is done GMM/SM BSSGP Network service GMM/SM LLC RLC MAC GSM RF LLC L1bis RLC MAC GSM RF BSSGP Network Service L1bis GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 17 dynamically according to the "capacity on demand" principle, which is an important concept in GPRS air interface other than the Master-slave concept. The master-slave concept states that at least one PDCH (mapped on one physical time slot), acting as a master, accommodates packet common control channels (PCCCHs) which carry all necessary control signaling for initiating packet transfer as well as user data and dedicated signaling. The others, acting as slaves, are only used for user data transfer. The capacity on demand concept states that load supervision should be done in the MAC layer to monitor the load on the PDCH(s), and the number of allocated PDCHs in a cell can be increased or decreased according to demand. However, the existence of PDCH(s) does not imply the existence of PCCCH. When no PCCCH is allocated in a cell, all GPRS attached MSs automatically camp on the existing GSM CCCH as they do in the idle state. When a PCCCH is allocated in a cell, all GPRS attached MS camp on it. Group Name Direction Function Description PBCCH PBCCH Downlink Broadcast Transmits system information to all GPRS terminals in a cell. PRACH Uplink Random access Used by the MSs to initiate packet transfers or respond to paging messages on this chanel.MSs transmit access burst with long guard times.On receiving access bursts the BSS assigns a timing advance to each terminal. PPCH Downlink Paging Used to page an MS prior to downlink packet transfer PAGCH Downlink Access grant Used in the packet transfer establishment phase to send resource assignment to an MS prior to the packet transfer. PCCC H PNCH Downlink Multicast Used to send a PTM Multicast notification to a group of MSs prior to a PTM packet transfer.The notification hasthe form of a resource assignment for the packet transfer. PDTCH Downlink and Uplink Data Its used for data transfer.More than one PDTCH can be used in parallel(Multislot operation) for individual. PTCH PACCH Downlink and Uplink Associated control Its used to convey signalling Information related to agiven Ms such asacknowledgements (Ack) and power control (PC) information.It also carries resource assignment messages either for allocation of a PDTCH or further occurences of a PACCH,one PACCH is associated with one or several PDTCHs concurrently assigned to one MS. Table 1: GPRS Logical Channels In GPRS, a multiframe structure is needed for the PDCH in order to accommodate paging groups and possibly blocks for broadcasting GPRS system information. The GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 18 multiframe structure of both 51 TDMA frames and 52 TDMA frames are the same as those specified for GSM. The network layer protocol data units (N-PDUs or packets) received form the network layer are transmitted across the air interface between the MS and the SGSN using the LLC protocol. First, the SNDCP transforms packets into LLC frames. The process includes optional header/data compression, segmentation, and encryption. An LLC frame is then segmented into RLC data blocks, which are formatted into the physical layer. Each block comprises four normal bursts in consecutive TDMA frames. Table 2 lists the GPRS logical channels and their functions. Fig. 4 shows the packet transformation data flow. Packet(N-PDU) Network Layer LLC Frame SNDCP Layer LLC Layer RLC Block RLC/MAC Layer Normal burst Physical Layer PH: Packet header FH: Frame header BH: Block header FCS: Frame check sequence BSC: Block check sequence Fig. 4: Packet transformation data flow Four different coding schemes, CS-1 to CS-4, are defined for the radio blocks carrying RLC data blocks. In GPRS, the differential initial code rates are obtained by puncturing a different number of bits from a common convolution code (rate 1/3). The resulting coding schemes are listed in Table 2. The selection of the initial modulation and code rate to use is based on regular measurements of the link quality. PH User data Segment Segment FH Info FSC Segme Segme Segme BH Info BS Trail Convolutional encoding Burst Burst Burst Burst GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 19 Table 2 - Coding parameters for the GPRS coding schemes 2.9.2 Medium Access Control The MAC sublayer manages access to the physical layer resources to minimize collisions between multiple users and to efficiently use the RF resources. The MAC sublayer serves as a shared medium between multiple MSs and the BSs for the transfer of higher layer service data units (SDUs). 2.9.3 Radio Resource Management GPRS radio resource management procedures are required for the following functions: allocation and release of physical resources (i.e., timeslots) associated with a GPRS channel; monitoring GPRS channel utilization to detect under-utilized or congested GPRS channels; initiating congestion control procedures; and distribution of GPRS channel configuration information for broadcasting to the MSs. GSM radio resources are dynamically shared between GPRS and other GSM services. GPRS radio resources may dynamically be increased to an operator defined maximum or decrease to an operator defined minimum. 2.9.4 Mobility Management The mobility management functions of GPRS ensure that the network knows the current location of MSs and provides user identity confidentiality. This is done by information exchange between the SGSN and the MSC/VLR. Among other functions, mobility management deals with cell selection, attach, routing area, update, detach and suspend procedures. These functions are based on the definition of the possible states and MS and a SGSN can have (i.e., idle, steady and ready). Mobility management functions are performed taking into account the mobile class. Channel name Radio Interface rate per time slot(kbps) CS-1 CS-2 CS-3 CS-4 9.05 13.4 15.6 21.4 GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 20 2.10 GPRS Operation In order to access the GPRS services, an MS shall first make its presence known to the network by performing a GPRS attach. This operation establishes a logical link between the MS and the SGSN, and makes the MS available for SMS over GPRS, paging via SGSN, and notification of incoming GPRS data. In order to send and receive GPRS data, the MS shall activate the packet data address that it wants to use. This operation makes the MS known in the corresponding GGSN, and interworking with external data networks can commence. User data is transferred transparently between the MS and the external data networks with a method known as encapsulation and tunneling: data packets are equipped with GPRS-specific protocol information and transferred between the MS and GGSN. This transparent transfer method lessens the requirement for the GPRS PLMN to interpret external data protocols, and it enables easy introduction of additional interworking protocols in the future. User data can be compressed and protected with retransmission protocols for efficiency and reliability. Fig. 5 - An example of routing Fig. 5 shows a simple example of routing in a mobile originated transmission. The serving SGSN of the source mobile encapsulates the packets transmitted by the MS and routes them to the appropriate GGSN. Based on the examination of the destination address, packets are then routed on the destination GGSN through the packet data network. The GGSN checks the routing context associated with the destination address and determines the serving SGSN and relevant tunneling information. Each packet is GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 21 then encapsulated and forwarded to the SGSN, which delivers it to the destination mobile. 2.10.1 Mobile Originated Packet Transfer An MS initiates a packet transfer by making a packet channel request on the PRACH or RACH. The network responds on PAGCH or AGCH, respectively. Fig. 6 shows an up- link data transfer procedure. It is possible to use a one -or two phase- packet access method. In one phase access, the network responds to the packet channel request with the packet immediate assignment, reserving the resources on the PDCHs for up-link transfer of radio blocks. In a two-phase access, the network responds to the packet channel request with the packet immediate assignment, which reserves the up-link resources for transmitting the packet resource request. The packet resource request carries the complete description of the requested resources for the up-link transfer. Thereafter, the network responds with the packet resource assignment, reserving resources for the up-link transfer. If there is no response to the packet channel request within a predefined time period, the MS retries after a random back-off time. However, the MS may contend again even though its last packet channel request was already correctly received. This could produce a wave of packet channel request on the BSS that may exceed the limit of packets that it can handle. To avoid this problem, the sender is notified that its message is correctly received and that it will receive a resource assignment later. In this way, the system builds a queue of MSs, which wait for their turn to receive a packet resource assignment to send a frame. On a request for an attach, authentication of the MS may be performed (i.e. the SGSN obtains triplet information and challenges the MS). If the MS passes authentication, GSM encryption is used and subscriber data from the GPRS HLR is downloaded into the SGSN. In order to access a data service, the user is first required to establish a PDP context with the network. This identifies to the network the type of data network to which the mobile station wishes to connect (e.g., X.25 or IP) and, in the case of IP, if a static or dynamic IP address is to be used. The IP address space may belong to either a GSM service provider or another data network. In addition, the context identifies the point of interconnect to the data network (the GGSN). In the case of dynamic IP allocation, the GGSN or network behind the GGSN allocates the IP address. GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 22 MS BSS Packet channel request PRACH or RACH PAGCH or AGCH Packet immediate assignment Packet resource request PACCH Packet resource assignment PACCH Random access Transmission Frame Transmission PDTCH Negative acknowledgement PACCH Retransmission of blocks in error PDTCH Acknowledgement PACCH FIG 6 -MAC layer:Random access and transmission for uplink data transfer 2.10.2 Mobile Terminated Packet Transfer A BSS initiates a packet transfer by sending a packet-paging request on the PPCH or PCH downlink. The MS responds to the page by initiating a procedure for page response very similar to the packet access procedure described earlier. The paging procedure is followed by the packet resource assignment for downlink frame transfer containing the list of PDCHs to be used. Fig. 7 shows a downlink data transfer. GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 23 MS BSS Packet paging request PPCH or PCH PRACH or RACH Packet channel request Packet immediate assignment PAGCH or AGCH Packet paging response PACCH Packet resource assignment PACCH or PAGCH or AGCH Paging transmission Frame Transmission PDTCH Negative acknowledgement PACCH Retransmission of blocks in error PDTCH Acknowledgement PACCH FIG 7 -MAC layer:Random access and transmission for downlink data transfer Since an identifier is included in each radio block, it is possible to multiplex radio blocks destined for different MSs on the same PDCH downlink. It is also possible to interrupt a data transmission to one MS if a higher priority data or pending control message is to be sent to some other MS. Furthermore, if more that one PDCH is available for the down- link traffic, and provided the MS is capable of monitoring multiple PDCHs, blocks belonging to the same frame can be transferred on different PDCHs in parallel. The network obtains acknowledgements for down-link transmission by polling the MS. The MS sends the ACK/NACK message in the reserved radio block which is allocated in the polling process. In the case of a negative acknowledgement, only those blocks listed as erroneous are retransmitted. 2.11 Where is GPRS now? In the following table show the countries and operators that have the GPRS system planned, in deployment or in service. Country Operator Network System Supplier Mobile Data Status Argentina Telecom Personal Personal US TDMA-800 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Australia Cable & Wireless Optus Optus Mobile Digital GSM-900 Nokia GPRS Planned Cable & Wireless Optus Optus Mobile Digital GSM-900 Nortel GPRS Planned GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 24 Telstra CDMA-800 Nortel 1XRTT Vodafone Vodafone GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS Planned Austria Connect Austria One GSM-1800 Nokia HSCSD Planned max.mobil Siemens GPRS In Service Mobilkom A1 - Mobilkom GSM-9/18 Motorola GPRS Planned tele.ring GSM-1800 Alcatel GPRS In Service Belgium Belgacom Mobile Proximus GSM-900 Motorola GPRS Planned Belgacom Mobile Proximus GSM-9/18 Motorola GPRS Planned Mobistar GSM-900 Nokia GPRS Trial Bolivia Entel Movil Entel Movil GSM-1900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Nuevatel Nuevatel GSM-1900 Nokia GPRS In Deployment Telemar Alcatel&Nokia GPRS In Deployment Brazil MobiTel Siemens GPRS In Service Bulgaria GloBul Motorola GPRS In Deployment Canada Clearnet Communications PCS CDMA-1900 Lucent 1XRTT Microcell Telecommunications Fido CDMA-1900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Microcell Telecommunications Fido CDMA-1900 Nortel GPRS In Deployment Rogers AT&T Cantel AT&T US TDMA-8/19 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Bell Mobility CDMA-1900 Nortel 1XRTT Bell Mobility CDMA-1900 Nortel 1XRTT China Beijing Mobile GSM-900 Motorola GPRS In Deployment Beijing Unicom GSM-900 Siemens GPRS Trial China Mobile A, M, N & E GPRS Test China Unicom No, M & S GPRS Test Chongqing Mobile CTA GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Fujian Mobile GSM-900 Nokia GPRS In Deployment Fujian Mobile GSM-9/18 Nokia GPRS Planned Fuzhou Unicom GSM-900 Siemens GPRS Trial Guangdong Mobile GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Guangdong Mobile GSM-900 Nokia GPRS In Deployment Shenzhen Unicom GSM-900 Motorola GPRS In Deployment Guangxi Mobile GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Hainan Mobile GSM-900 Nokia GPRS In Deployment Hebei Mobile GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Hebei Mobile GSM-900 Motorola GPRS Planned Hebei Mobile GSM-900 Nortel GPRS Trial Heilongjiang Unicom GSM-900 Siemens GPRS In Deployment Henan Mobile GSM-900 Nokia GPRS Planned Hubei Mobile GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Jiangsu Mobile GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Nanjing Unicom GSM-900 Alcatel GPRS Trial Wuxi Unicom GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS Trial Shandong Mobile GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Shanghai Mobile GSM-1800 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Shanghai Mobile GSM-900 Siemens GPRS Trial Shanghai Unicom GSM-900 Nokia GPRS Planned Shanghai Unicom GSM-900 Siemens GPRS Planned Sichuan Mobile GSM-900 Motorola GPRS In Deployment GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 25 Tianjin Mobile GSM-900 Motorola GPRS In Deployment Tianjin Mobile GSM-900 Nortel GPRS Trial Yunnan PTA GSM-900 Nokia HSCSD In Deployment Zhejiang Mobile GSM-900 Alcatel GPRS Trial Zhejiang Mobile GSM-900 Motorola GPRS In Deployment Zhejiang Unicom GSM-900 Nortel GPRS Planned CroNet Siemens GPRS In Service Croatia Vip Net Ericsson GPRS In Service Cyprus CYTA (South) Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Czech Cesky Mobil Oscar GSM-9/18 Ericsson GPRS Planned Republic EuroTel Praha Nokia GPRS In Deployment RadioMobil Paegas GSM-900 Motorola GPRS In Deployment Denmark Dansk Mobil Telefon Sonofon GSM-900 Nokia GPRS Trial Mobilix Mobilix GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS Trial Orange Nokia GPRS In Deployment Tele Danmark Mobil GSM-1800 Nokia HSCSD In Service Telia Ericsson GPRS In Service Tele Danmark Mobil GSM-900 Nokia HSCSD In Service El Salvador Personal Alcatel GPRS In Deployment Estonia Radiolinja Nokia GPRS In Deployment Finland Alands Mobile Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Radiolinja GSM-900 Nokia GPRS In Deployment Radiolinja GSM-900 Siemens GPRS Trial Radiolinja GSM-9/18 Nokia GPRS In Deployment Radiolinja GSM-9/18 Siemens GPRS Trial Sonera GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Service Sonera GSM-9/18 Nokia HSCSD In Service Suomen 2G Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Telia Nokia GPRS In Deployment France Bouygues Telecom Bouygues GSM-1800 Nortel GPRS Trial Cegetel SFR GSM-900 Alcatel GPRS Trial Cegetel SFR GSM-900 Nokia GPRS Planned France Telecom Itineris GSM-900 Alcatel GPRS Trial France Telecom Itineris GSM-900 Motorola GPRS Trial France Telecom Itineris GSM-9/18 Alcatel GPRS Trial France Telecom Itineris GSM-9/18 Motorola GPRS Trial Orange France Alcatel GPRS In Deployment Germany E-Plus Nokia GPRS In Service Mannesmann Mobilfunk D2 GSM-900 Ericsson HSCSD In Service Mannesmann Mobilfunk D2 GSM-900 Siemens GPRS Planned T-Mobil D1 GSM-900 Alcatel GPRS In Deployment T-Mobil D1 GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment T-Mobil D1 GSM-900 Lucent GPRS In Deployment T-Mobil D1 GSM-900 Motorola GPRS In Service Viag Interkom E2 Mobilfunk GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS In Service Greece Cosmote Cosmote GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS In Service Panafon Panafon GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Service Hong Kong Cable & Wireless HKT 1010 and One2Free GSM-9/18 Nokia HSCSD Planned GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 26 Mandarin Communications Sunday GSM-1800 Nortel GPRS Trial New World Telephone New World PCS GSM-1800 Nokia HSCSD In Deployment New World Telephone New World PCS GSM-1800 Nokia HSCSD In Deployment Pacific Century CyberWorks HKT 1010 and One2Free GSM-9/18 Nokia HSCSD Planned Peoples Phone Ericsson GPRS In Deployment SmarTone SmarTone GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment SmarTone SmarTone GSM-9/18 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment SmarTone GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Sunday Communications GSM-1800 Nortel GPRS Trial Pannon Ericsson GPRS In Service Hungary Westel 900 Eurofon GSM-900 Motorola GPRS Trial Iceland Landssimi Ericsson GPRS In Deployment TAL TAL GSM-900 Nortel GPRS Planned India BPL Mobile GSM-900 Motorola GPRS Planned Escotel Mobile-Haryana Lucent GPRS In Deployment Escotel Mobile-Kerala Lucent GPRS In Deployment Escotel Mobile-Uttar Pradesh Lucent GPRS In Deployment Spice Communications-Punjab GPRS Planned Indonesia Telkomsel Siemens GPRS In Deployment Ireland Eircell Ericsson GPRS In Service Esat Digifone Nortel GPRS In Deployment Israel Orange Ericsson GPRS In Service Italy Blu GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS Planned Omnitel Nokia GPRS In Service Telecom Italia Mobile GSM-900 Ericsson HSCSD In Deployment Telecom Italia Mobile GSM-900 Siemens GPRS Trial Telecom Italia Mobile GSM-9/18 Ericsson HSCSD In Deployment Lebanon FTML Cellis GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS Planned Liechtenstein Viag Europlattform GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS In Deployment Bite Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Lithuania Omnitel Motorola GPRS In Deployment Luxembourg LuxGSM Siemens GPRS In Service Socit Europenne de Communication TANGO GSM-9/18 Ericsson HSCSD In Service Celcom Celcom GSM GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS Planned Celcom Cellcom GSM GSM-900 Lucent GPRS Trial Malaysia Digi Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Time Wireless Adam GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS In Service Malta MobIsle Communications GSM-1800 Nortel GPRS Planned Vodafone Siemens GPRS In Service Mexico Telcel Telcel US TDMA 1900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Morocco ONPT Siemens GPRS In Deployment Netherlands Ben Nederland Ben GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS Planned Dutchtone Nokia GPRS In Deployment KPN ATF-4 GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS Trial Libertel Vodafone Ericsson GPRS In Service Telfort GSM-1800 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 27 New Zealand Vodafone New Zealand (formerly BellSouth) GSM-900 Nokia GPRS Trial Norway NetCom NetCom GSM-900 Siemens GPRS In Service Telenor Mobil Telenor Mobil GSM-900 Ericsson HSCSD In Deployment Telenor Mobil Telenor Mobil GSM-900 Nokia HSCSD In Deployment Telenor Mobil Telenor Mobil GSM-9/18 Nokia HSCSD In Deployment Philippines Globe Telecom Handyphone GSM-900 Nokia GPRS Planned Smart Communications Gold GSM GSM-9/18 Nokia GPRS Planned Poland Centertel Idea GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS In Service Polkomtel Plus GSM GSM-900 Nokia GPRS Planned Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa Era GSM GSM-9/18 Ericsson GPRS Trial Portugal Optimus Nokia GPRS In Deployment Telecel Telecel GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS Trial Telecel Telecel GSM-9/18 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment TMN Telemovel GSM-9/18 Alcatel GPRS Trial Qatar Q-Tel Alcatel GPRS In Deployment Romania MobilRom Siemens GPRS In Service Russia KB Impuls Bee Line GSM GSM-9/18 Nokia GPRS In Deployment Mobile Telesystems MTS GSM-900 Motorola GPRS In Deployment Sonic Duo Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Saudi Arabia STC Al-Jawwal GSM GSM-9/18 Lucent GPRS Trial Singapore MobileOne GSM M1 GSM GSM-900 Nokia HSCSD In Service Singapore Telecom SingTel Mobile GSM-900 Ericsson HSCSD In Deployment Singapore Telecom SingTel Mobile GSM-9/18 Ericsson HSCSD In Deployment StarHub GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS Trial South Africa Vodacom Vodacom GSM-900 Alcatel GPRS Trial Vodacom Vodacom GSM-900 Siemens GPRS Trial Spain AirTel S & E GPRS In Deployment Amena GPRS In Service Telefnica MoviStar GSM-9/18 Nokia GPRS In Service Sweden Convig Siemens GPRS In Deployment Europolitan Europolitan GSM-900 Nokia GPRS Planned Europolitan GSM-1800 Nokia HSCSD In Service Tele2 Siemens GPRS In Service Telia Mobitel Telia Mobitel GSM GSM-900 Ericsson HSCSD Trial Switzerland diAx GSM-9/18 Nokia GPRS Planned Orange GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS Planned Sunrise Nokia GPRS In Deployment Swisscom GSM-9/18 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Taiwan Chunghwa Telecom GSM National GSM-9/18 Nokia GPRS Planned Chunghwa Telecom GSM National GSM-9/18 Nortel GPRS Planned FarEasTone GSM-1800 GSM-9/18 Ericsson GPRS Trial Mobitai Siemens GPRS In Deployment KG Telecom GSM-1800 GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS In Deployment FarEasTone GSM North GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS Trial KG Telecom GSM-1800 GSM-1800 Lucent GPRS Planned KG Telecom GSM-1800 GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS In Service KG Telecom GSM-1800 GSM-1800 Nokia GPRS In Deployment GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 28 TransAsia Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Thailand AIS Siemens GPRS In Deployment CP Orange Alcatel GPRS In Deployment TAC Nokia GPRS In Deployment Tunisia Tunisie Telecom Tunicell GSM-900 Alcatel GPRS Planned Turkey Telsim Telsim GSM-900 Motorola GPRS Trial Turkcell GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS Planned Uae Etisalat A & M GPRS In Deployment UK BT Cellnet BT Cellnet GSM-900 Motorola GPRS In Deployment BT Cellnet GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Service One-2-One GSM-1800 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment One-2-One GSM-1800 Nortel GPRS Planned Orange Orange GSM-1800 Nokia HSCSD Trial Orange GSM-1800 Ericsson GPRS Planned Vodafone Vodafone GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS Trial Ukraine Kyivstar GSM Kyivstar GSM GSM-900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment UMC Siemens GPRS In Deployment USA Alltel Trial cdma2000 Motorola 1XRTT Alltel CDMA-800 Motorola 1XRTT Cingular Wireless BellSouth Mobility DCS GSM-1900 Nortel GPRS In Deployment Cingular Wireless Pacific Bell Wireless GSM-1900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Powertel Powertel GSM-1900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Sprint PCS Sprint PCS CDMA-1900 Lucent 1XRTT Sprint PCS Sprint PCS CDMA-1900 Nortel 1XRTT Sprint PCS CDMA-1900 Motorola 1XRTT Verizon Wireless CDMA-8/19 Lucent 1XRTT Verizon Wireless CDMA-8/19 Nortel 1XRTT VoiceStream Omnipoint GSM-1900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment VoiceStream Omnipoint GSM-1900 Nortel GPRS In Deployment VoiceStream VoiceStream GSM-1900 Nokia GPRS In Deployment VoiceStream GSM-1900 Ericsson GPRS In Deployment Leap Wireless Cricket CDMA-1900 Ericsson 1XRTT Venezuela Digitel GSM-900 Nokia&Siemen s Infonet GSM-900 Digicel GSM-900 3 GPRS Radio Design and Optimisation Methodology Operators implementing 2.5G already have operational GSM voice networks, often supporting millions of customers. It is therefore imperative that voice quality of service (QoS) is maintained across these networkseven after GPRS services are runningas voice traffic will still provide the main source of revenue. Evidence from operators which have embraced and heavily marketed mobile internet services shows that, on average, 82 per cent of revenue generated from their mobile internet customers is still derived from voice traffic. . GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 29 Currently, some of the largest GSM networks have over 60 per cent of their customer base using prepaid services. While the growth of prepaid services has greatly enhanced operators' customer bases and revenues, it has also driven the requirements for fully optimised radio interfaces, as the increased demand has required more efficient frequency reuse, traffic management algorithms and aggressive parameter management. 3.1 Visibility of network performance The importance of an optimised air interface, one that will deliver 2.5G services through the same scarce air interface resource effectively, increases as the network customer base growsand particularly when that growth is rapid. In order for operators to meet this increased challenge through optimisation techniques, the need for clear and relevant visibility of network performance becomes critical. The reuse of the same radio interface in 2.5G networks means that visibility of interactions between the circuit and packet- switched traffic in radio resource usage is imperative for capacity planning, traffic management algorithm development, hot-spot detection and engineering rule design and validation. One of the major factors driving this search for detail is the significant differences in how and where control of the interaction between the mobile terminal and the network resides in 2G and 2.5G networks. In 2.5G, the network will no longer enjoy the levels of control that it currently has in 2G and this will directly affect optimisation strategies. Providing an optimised 2G network requires a detailed understanding of how the network is operating. This understanding is gained through a mixture of OSS systems, drive tests, comparative / benchmarking exercises, detailed investigation and, of course, customer feedback. 2G operators have access to measurement systems that have matured with the networks, providing a rich variety of views on network performance. These tools enable both network monitoring and localised investigation to be available to optimisation teams. Although there are limitations in each individual tool, used together, the operator can access a wealth of data and accumulated knowledge. The 2.5G networks, which have recently been launched or are very soon to be launched, lack the support of mature measurement systems and the ubiquitously available tools from the 2G environment. In fact, until relatively recently, the extent of the problem was such that reliable terminals with which network testing could begin were not even available. 3.2 Unknown service requirements Although the introduction of test mobiles has been addressed and measurement systems are beginning to deliver the visibility of network performance operators expect and require, other issues for 2.5G network optimisation have become more pressing. In 2G, where voice calls and usage patterns are relatively well understood, the major problems faced by the operator were the volumes of data to be captured and analysed. GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 30 In 2.5G networks, whilst the existing challenges with voice remain, there are additional problems, particularly 'what services will be used by which customers, where, when and in what quantities? For example, if we look at the Scandinavian countries where mobile penetration rates are highest, the impact of having sections of the population with almost 100 per cent mobile ownership rates has meant that additional services, such as mobile chat rooms, are being developed and deployed. These were unforeseen at the launch of GSM. Again, looking at how mobile usage patterns have migrated from the early adopter countries to the rest of the world, it is fair to assume that what is happening in Scandinavia is likely to appear elsewhere as the economic opportunity for services develop. This leaves the operators with a challenge: how to optimise the 2.5G networks without impacting their growing 2G networks and without fully understanding how these networks will be used? However, the rate at which the new 2.5G networks will be used is largely in the hands of the network operators. They can control the rate of uptakes through their policies on handset availability, service offering, pricing structures, partnerships and co-operation with branded and proven content providers. Operators are already aware of the impact of these policies through their 2G experience and the policies through their 2G experience and the effects of the prepaid explosion on their networks. In order to optimise these 2.5G networks, operators now require tools that can be used to understand, in detail, how the packet network service usage is interacting with their voice services. These tools must provide the ability to analyse and report on network performance based on multiple manufacturer test handset types, because as with 2G, terminal performance directly impacts the customers' perception of service. The details of call/session events and the sequences of these events, as seen from the often multi- vendor network infrastructure, must therefore be clearly visible and accessible through any new optimisation tools. Any new tools must also permit operators to develop algorithms in their network-level measurement tools for wholesale network optimisation algorithms that will require refining and developing as the handset and service mix on the 2.5G networks alter and as the user base grows. The advantages of providing optimised networks, delivering maximum QoS and equipment use are well known from experience in 2G. 3.3 Design Cases This document considers two scenarios where the GPRS design is concern. This can involve a new design for a GPRS services and a migration from GSM to GPRS network. 3.3.1 New GSM Network Design with GPRS In comparison, designing a new 2.5G GSM air interface from scratch (one which would cater for internet) is much easier than optimising the existing GSM air interface to accommodate for GPRS. In the new design for GPRS all parameters regarding GPRS will be included in the link budgets as shown below in the next section. In the new design the cell radius will have been already calculated with GPRS in mind. As a result the network will be designed GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 31 according to the market requirements to ensure QoS. Further more, the allocation of time slot to GPRS could also be determined from the start to ensure the required throughput with regards to capacity study. 3.3.2 Migration from GSM to GPRS network In this case the existing GSM network is analysed to accommodate GPRS services. The steps that must be taken to ensure the migration is shown in the Figure 8 below. The design involves for coverage and capacity dimensions. Input Parameters Dat a Subscri bers/ Appl i cat i ons and Traffi c per Subscri ber/ QoS/ Ar eas t o be cover ed Coverage Planning Desi gn of Radi o Cel l s ( Li nkbudget) and Int erference Anal ysi s for al l CS Traffic Planning How many subscri ber wi l l use which applications with which data rate and QoS according to which traffic model? Results: * Cel l Di amet er *Reduct i on of mean t hroughput by Int erference *Tot al Number of Radi o Cel l s f or Cover age Results: *Number of needed PDCHs per radi o cel l *Number of new r adi o cel l s/ BTS *Mean Dat a Thr oughput Results: Number of new equi pment uni t s needed i n t he net wor k! Figura 8: Migration from GSM to GPRS GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 32 4 GPRS Link Budgets In analysing the GPRS link budgets, as an example the dense urban area of Paris is considered. The design is based on this area. The examples of the link budgets and other parameters are show below. Inputs to the Link budgets of both GSM and GPRS are shown in the table below. Table 3: Input data for the GPRS link Budget Denseurban InDoor Urban InDoor Suburban InDoor Rural-Open InCar Rural-Open Outdoor Area that should be covered (km2) 40 35 1 20 4.2 Total Area (km2) 100.2 General Information Frequency (MHz) 900 Cell pattern Clover pattern Clover pattern Clover pattern Clover pattern Clover pattern Standard deviation (dB) 7 7 6 5 5 Probability on cell border (%) 90 90 90 90 90 BS antenna height (m) 30 30 35 50 50 BS Peak Power at PA output (Watt) 35 BS Peak Power at PA output (dBm) 45.4 BS sensitivity (dBm) -109.4 BS sensitivity for CS-1 for GPRS -109.2 BS sensitivity for CS-2 for GPRS -105.6 Base BS sensitivity for CS-3 for GPRS -103.4 Station BS sensitivity for CS-4 for GPRS -96.1 BS antenna gain (dB) 15.5 Uplink diversity gain (dB) 4 BS cable loss (dB) 2 Connector loss (dB) 0 Combiner loss (dB) 5.7 Jumper cables loss 0 Duplexer loss dB 0 MS antenna height (m) 1.5 MS Power (Watt) 2 Mobile MS Power (dBm) 33 Station MS sensitivity for GSM handsets (dBm) -100 MS sensitivity for GPRS handsets (dBm) -104 MS antenna gain (dB) 0 Downlink diversity gain (dB) 0 Interference degradation margin (dB) 3 Inter. Degrad. margin for GPRS load (dB) 2 Other Body loss (dB) 3 losses InDoor/InCar penetration loss (dB) 18 18 15 6 0 Fade margin 9 9 7.7 6.4 6.4 GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 33 Power_Threshold = Mobile_Sensitivity + Losses MS_Gains Table 4: Received power thresholds ERP = Output_Power Hardware_Losses + BS_Gains Table 5: Effective Radiated Power Denseurban InDoor Urban InDoor Suburban InDoor Rural-Open InCar Rural-Open Outdoor Power thresholds (dBm) -67 -67 -71.3 -81.6 -87.6 MS sensitivity (dBm) -100 -100 -100 -100 -100 Losses Interference degradation margin (dB) 3 3 3 3 3 Body loss (dB) 3 3 3 3 3 Fade margin (dB) 9 9 7.7 6.4 6.4 InDoor/InCar penetration loss (dB) 18 18 15 6 0 Gains MS antenna gain (dB) 0 0 0 0 0 Downlink diversity gain (dB) 0 0 0 0 0 Fade Standard deviation (dB) 7 7 6 5 5 margin Probability on cell border (%) 90 90 90 90 90 calculation Fade Margin (dB) 9 9 7.7 6.4 6.4 Coding scheme Denseurban InDoor Urban InDoor Suburban InDoor Rural-Open InCar Rural-Open Outdoor Coding scheme-1 (dBm) -71.8 -71.8 -76.1 -86.4 -92.4 For GPRS Coding scheme-2 (dBm) -68.1 -68.1 -72.4 -82.7 -88.7 Coding scheme-3 (dBm) -66.4 -66.4 -70.7 -81 -87 Coding scheme-4 (dBm) -58.7 -58.7 -63 -73.3 -79.3 ERP (dBm) 53.2 EIRP (dBm) 55.4 BS Peak Power at PA output (dBm) 45.4 DL-Cable Loss (dB) 2 Connector loss (dB) 0 Combiner loss (dB) 5.7 Duplexer loss (dB) 0 Jumper cables loss (dB) 0 BS downlink diversity gain (dB) 0 BS antenna gain (dB) 15.5 Hardware losses Gains GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 34 4.1 Maximum Allowable Path Loss Table 6: Maximum allowable path losses for uplink and for downlink MAPL Up = PA m - L CCC - L Body - L Bldg - M Fade + G B + G M + Diversity gain - RX Base Uplink Denseurban InDoor Urban InDoor Suburban InDoor Rural-Open InCar Rural-Open Outdoor Max. Allowable Path Loss 126.9 126.9 131.2 141.5 147.5 MAPL for GPRS for CS-1 (dB) 129.7 129.7 134 144.3 150.3 MAPL for GPRS for CS-2 (dB) 126 126 130.3 140.6 146.6 MAPL for GPRS for CS-3 (dB) 124.3 124.3 128.6 138.9 144.9 MAPL for GPRS for CS-4 (dB) 116.6 116.6 120.9 131.2 137.2 MS Power (dBm) 33 BS cable loss (dB) 2 Connector loss (dB) 0 Jumper cables loss 0 Duplexer loss 0 Interference degradation margin (dB) 3 Body loss (dB) 3 InDoor/InCar penetration loss (dB) 18 18 15 6 Fade Margin (dB) 9 9 7.7 6.4 6.4 MS antenna gain (dB) 0 BS antenna gain (dB) 15.5 Uplink diversity gain (dB) 4 BS sensitivity (dBm) -109.4 PL Down = PA B - L CCC - L Bldg - L Body - M Fade + G M + G B - RX Mobile Downlink Denseurban InDoor Urban InDoor Suburban InDoor Rural-Open InCar Rural-Open Outdoor Max. Allowable Path Loss 120.2 120.2 124.5 134.8 140.8 MAPL for GPRS for CS-1 (dB) 125 125 129.3 139.6 145.6 MAPL for GPRS for CS-2 (dB) 121.3 121.3 125.6 135.9 141.9 MAPL for GPRS for CS-3 (dB) 119.6 119.6 123.9 134.2 140.2 MAPL for GPRS for CS-4 (dB) 111.9 111.9 116.2 126.5 132.5 BS Power (dBm) 45.4 BS cable loss (dB) 2 Connector loss (dB) 0 Combiner loss (dB) 5.7 Jumper cables loss 0 Duplexer loss 0 Interference degradation margin (dB) 3 Body loss (dB) 3 InDoor/InCar penetration loss (dB) 18 18 15 6 Fade Margin (dB) 9 9 7.7 6.4 6.4 MS antenna gain (dB) 0 BS antenna gain (dB) 15.5 Downlink diversity gain (dB) 0 MS sensitivity (dBm) -100 GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 35 4.2 Cell Size Estimation Table 7: Cell size estimation (PathLoss- A + C+A(hm) - Cm )/ B PathLoss = A+BlogR-A(hm)-C+Cm R=10 f<1500 A= 69.55+26.16log(f)-13.82log(hb) f = frequency (MHz) 1500<f<2000 A= 46.3+33.9log(f)-13.82log(hb) hb = height of the base station antenna (m) B= 44.9-6.55log(hb) for urban C= 0 for Suburban C= 2[log(f/28)]2+5.4 for Open & Rural C= 4.78[log(f)]2-18.33log(f)+40.94 for large cities, A(hm)=[log(11.75hm)]2-4.97 hm = height of the mobile station antenna (m) for other cities, A(hm)= [1.11log(f)-0.7]hm-[1.56log(f)-0.8] f<1500 Cm= 0 f>1500 for large cities Cm= 3 f>1500 for other cities Cm= 0 Frequency band A B C [suburban] C [open&rural] A(hm) Cm 300< f < 1500MHz 126.4191683 35.22485578 9.942607248 28.50641809 0.060195463 0 1500 > f > 2000MHz Denseurban InDoor Urban InDoor Suburban InDoor Rural-Open InCar Rural-Open Outdoor Maximum Allowable PathLoss 120.2 120.2 124.5 134.8 140.8 MAPL for GPRS for CS-1 (dB) 125.0 125.0 129.3 139.6 145.6 MAPL for GPRS for CS-2 (dB) 121.3 121.3 125.6 135.9 141.9 MAPL for GPRS for CS-3 (dB) 119.6 119.6 123.9 134.2 140.2 MAPL for GPRS for CS-4 (dB) 111.9 111.9 116.2 126.5 132.5 A 126.4191683 B 35.22485578 Clutter correction factor C -1.0 1.0 11.0 29.0 29.0 A(hm) 0.060195463 Cm 0 Range or Radius for GSM (km) 0.626 0.714 1.818 11.559 17.110 Radius for CS-1 for GPRS (km) 0.857 0.977 2.488 15.819 23.416 Radius for CS-2 for GPRS (km) 0.673 0.767 1.953 12.421 18.386 Radius for CS-3 for GPRS (km) 0.602 0.686 1.748 11.114 16.452 Radius for CS-4 for GPRS (km) 0.364 0.415 1.057 6.719 9.945 GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 36 4.3 Cell Count Estimation Site_Count = (Clutter_Area)/(Site_Area_in_the_Clutter) Table 8: Cell count estimation For Clover Pattern: For Hexagon Pattern: R R The area of each Cell: The area of each Cell: The area of each Site: The area of each Site: C 2 8 3 3 _ = R S 2 8 3 9 _ = R C 2 2 3 _ = R S 2 2 3 3 _ = Clutter Denseurban InDoor Urban InDoor Suburban InDoor Rural-Open InCar Rural-Open Outdoor Clutter area (km2) 40 35 1 20 4.2 Cell pattern Clover pattern Clover pattern Clover pattern Clover pattern Clover pattern Cell range for GSM (km) 0.626 0.714 1.818 11.559 17.11 Site size for GSM (km2) 0.764 0.993 6.440 260.348 570.444 No of sites in each clutter for GSM 53 36 1 1 1 Total no of sites for GSM 92 Required Coding Schemes for GPRS CS-3 CS-3 CS-2 CS-2 CS-2 Cell range for required CS for GPRS (km) 0.602 0.686 1.953 12.421 18.386 Site size for required CS for GPRS (km2) 0.706 0.917 7.432 300.626 658.700 No of sites in each clutter for GPRS 57 39 1 1 1 Total no of sites for GPRS 99 Cell Range for GPRS CS-1 (km) 0.857 0.977 2.488 15.819 23.416 Cell Range for GPRS CS-2 (km) 0.673 0.767 1.953 12.421 18.386 Cell Range for GPRS CS-3 (km) 0.602 0.686 1.748 11.114 16.452 Cell Range for GPRS CS-4 (km) 0.364 0.415 1.057 6.719 9.945 Site size for GPRS CS-1 (km2) 1.431 1.860 12.062 487.608 1068.412 Site size for GPRS CS-2 (km2) 0.883 1.146 7.432 300.626 658.700 Site size for GPRS CS-3 (km2) 0.706 0.917 5.954 240.688 527.413 Site size for GPRS CS-4 (km2) 0.258 0.336 2.177 87.968 192.718 No of sites in each clutter for GPRS CS-1 28 19 1 1 1 No of sites in each clutter for GPRS CS-2 46 31 1 1 1 No of sites in each clutter for GPRS CS-3 57 39 1 1 1 No of sites in each clutter for GPRS CS-4 155 105 1 1 1 GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 37 5 Considerations in the GPRS link budgets As we will see in the link budgets there are some new aspects regarding the GPRS design that we will have to take into account. 5.1 Rx Sensitivity Vs Coding Scheme It is known that for a given BLER each type of modulation and coding requires a minimum signal to noise ratio (C/N), which at bit level is stated Eb/No. The Rx sensitivity is depending on this C/N as shown here Rx= 10 log (KTB) + NF + C/N To achieve the required BLER (eg 10%) each coding scheme requires a level of C/N, therefore due to the differrent C/N requirements of each coding schemes, the Rx sensitivity will be different for each one of them too. As the data rates increases the error protection is reduced and therefore more C/N is required. As an example here is a table with some results based on simulation of propagation condition TU50 with ideal frequency hopping and without Rx diversity: Service QoS Required C/N BS Sensitivity for Talk Family from NOKIA Speech RBERII<8% 6.0 dB -108 dBm CS-1 BLER<10% 6.2 dB -107.8 dBm CS-2 BLER<10% 9.8 dB -104.1 dBm CS-3 BLER<10% 12 dB -102,0 dBm CS-4 BLER<10% 19.3 dB -94,7 dBm Table 9: Changes in BTS Sensitivity for differents coding schemes 5.2 Body Loss The typical 3 dB body loss associated with voice service has to be excluded from the GPRS service link budgets. This gives GPRS services a 3 dB benefit. In effect, this result in CS-1 is achieving a higher tolerable path loss than the voice service, while CS-2 becomes comparable to the voice service. So the cell radio for CS-1 and CS-2 is usually bigger or similar than for voice service. Therefore, in terms of coverage, the service for CS-1 and CS-2 will be available at least in the area that would have been covered in a GSM voice network. The table below shows the parameters that have differences in maximum allowable path loss in case of sensitivities for various coding schemes and for the GSM voice traffic. GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 38 Service Speech CS-1 CS-2 CS-3 CS-4 Required C/N 6.0 dB 6.2dB 9.8dB 12.0dB 19.3 BTS Sensitivity -108dBm -107.8 dBm -104.1dBm -102.4 dBm -94.7 dBm Body Loss 3 dB 0 dB 0 dB 0 dB 0 dB Link budget difference related to talk family Speech service --- +2.8 dB -0.8 dB -3.0 dB -10.3 dB Table 10: GPRS maximum allowable path loss differences related to GSM due to change in sensitivity 5.3 2 dB C/I degradation in the Downlink One factor affecting the interference level is the actual load factor of the interferers. Simulations performed have indicated that the effect of GPRS load on the existing GSM service will be of the order of up 2dB C/I degradation in the downlink TCH case, but less on the uplink. No effect would be anticipated on the downlink BCCH case. That is because on the TCH case, the amount of interference generated depends on the loading of the TRXs and the power control, but since downlink power control to GPRS terminal is not used (at least in the phase 1) and extra load can be anticipated, there will tend to be an increase in interference levels when GPRS services are introduced. On the BCCH case, permanently keyed carriers and the absence of downlink power control serve to keep the interference at a fixed amount. As the power control is implemented in the uplink case, the effect of the GPRS traffic is not a problem and there are not any differences between BCCH and TCH cases. So, in the link budgets, 2 dB have to be added in the computation of the MAPL for downlink to take this factor into account. 5.4 Coding Schemes Vs Clutters Operators may choose different coding schemes for different clutters. The reasons may be based on: The forecasted demand for the data rate, The capability of offering the coding schemes without (or with the minimum) changing in the existing GSM network, Or other reasons based on their business The cell count obtained from the link budgets analysis is approximately the same when designing the area using Planet. The coverage maps are shown in the next chapter. GPRS RF Optimization Report ver 1.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 39 6 Coverage Analysis 6.1 Coverage case study 1 Based on the Link Budgets Analysis we designed a GSM network for the city Paris. The total area considered for the design is approximately for 100 km 2 including 40 km 2 of dense urban, 35 km 2 urban, 1 km 2 suburban and 1 km 2 rural and open area. 6.1.1 GSM Coverage for Paris within the periphery area Figure 9: GSM Coverage for Paris Coverage Open/Rural outdoor Level: -87.6 dBm Open/rural Incar Level: -81.6 dBm Suburban-Indoor Level: -71.3 dBm Urban-Indoor Level: -67dBm GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 40 Figure 10: Details of the coverage The above table shows the covered area with the required threshold for Dense urban for GSM signal for different clutters. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 41 6.1.2 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS1 Figure 11: GPRS CS1 Coverage Coverage Coding Scheme-1 Level: -71.8 dBm Coding Scheme-2 Level: -68.1 dBm Coding Scheme-3 Level: -66.4 dBm Coding Scheme-4 Level: -58.7dBm GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 42 Figure 12: Details of coverage for CS1 The above table shows the covered area with the required threshold for GPRS Coding scheme 1 for different clutters. As we see comparing to the GSM coverage CS1 gives us a better coverage than GSM. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 43 6.1.3 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS2 Figure 13: GPRS coverage for CS2 Coverage Coding Scheme-1 Level: -71.8 dBm Coding Scheme-2 Level: -68.1 dBm Coding Scheme-3 Level: -66.4 dBm Coding Scheme-4 Level: -58.7dBm GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 44 Figure 14: Details of coverage for CS2 The above table shows the covered area with the required threshold for GPRS Coding scheme 2 for different clutters. As we could expect from the Link Budgets results CS2 coverage is almost the same as GSM coverage. That means with an existing GSM network we can meet at least the GPRS CS2 threshold. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 45 6.1.4 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS3 Figure 15: GPRS coverage for CS3 Coverage Coding Scheme-1 Level: -71.8 dBm Coding Scheme-2 Level: -68.1 dBm Coding Scheme-3 Level: -66.4 dBm Coding Scheme-4 Level: -58.7dBm GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 46 Figure 16: Details of coverage for CS3 The covered area with the required threshold for GPRS Coding scheme 3 for different clutters is shown in the above table. We can see how the covered area is shrinking comparing to the GSM coverage. That means with an existing GSM network we cannot meet the GPRS CS3 threshold for all parts. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 47 6.1.5 GPRS coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS4 Figure 17: GPRS coverage for CS4 Coverage Coding Scheme-1 Level: -71.8 dBm Coding Scheme-2 Level: -68.1 dBm Coding Scheme-3 Level: -66.4 dBm Coding Scheme-4 Level: -58.7dBm GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 48 Figure 18: Details of coverage for CS4 The above table shows the covered area with the required threshold for GPRS Coding scheme 4 for different clutters. As we can see the covered area in the objective areas is shrinking to 1/3 to 1/5 comparing to the GSM coverage. That means with an existing GSM network we can not meet the GPRS CS4 threshold. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 49 6.2 Coverage Case Study 2 In some cases due to the nature of the network there might be more sites available than required for a specific coding scheme. In this case the radio interface can simply be optimised to respond to the requirement of the throughput. For example as shown below a is the same area analysed in case study 1. But here the design shows 240 sites to cover traffic issues. 6.2.1 GSM Coverage for Paris within the periphery area with 240 sites Figure 19: GSM Coverage for 240 sites Coverage Open/Rural outdoor Level: -87.6 dBm Open/rural Incar Level: -81.6 dBm Suburban-Indoor Level: -71.3 dBm Urban-Indoor Level: -67dBm GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 50 Figure 20: Details of the coverage for GSM with 240 sites The above table shows the covered area with the required threshold for Dense urban for GSM signal for different clutters. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 51 6.2.2 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS1 with 240 sites Figure 21: GPRS CS-1 coverage for 240 sites Coverage Coding Scheme-1 Level: -71.8 dBm Coding Scheme-2 Level: -68.1 dBm Coding Scheme-3 Level: -66.4 dBm Coding Scheme-4 Level: -58.7dBm GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 52 Figure 22: Details of the coverage for CS-1 with 240 sites The above table shows the covered area with the required threshold for GPRS Coding scheme 1 for different clutters. As we see comparing to the GSM coverage CS1 gives us a better coverage than GSM. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 53 6.2.3 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS2 with 240 sites Figure 23: GPRS CS-2 coverage for 240 sites Coverage Coding Scheme-1 Level: -71.8 dBm Coding Scheme-2 Level: -68.1 dBm Coding Scheme-3 Level: -66.4 dBm Coding Scheme-4 Level: -58.7dBm GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 54 Figure 24: Details of the coverage for CS-2 with 240 sites The above table shows the covered area with the required threshold for GPRS Coding scheme 2 for different clutters. As we see comparing to the GSM coverage CS2 gives us a better coverage than GSM. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 55 6.2.4 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS3 with 240 sites Figure 25: GPRS CS-3 coverage for 240 sites Coverage Coding Scheme-1 Level: -71.8 dBm Coding Scheme-2 Level: -68.1 dBm Coding Scheme-3 Level: -66.4 dBm Coding Scheme-4 Level: -58.7dBm GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 56 Figure 26: Details of the coverage for CS-3 with 240 sites The covered area with the required threshold for GPRS Coding scheme 3 for different clutters, is shown in the above table. We can see how the covered area is almost the same as GSM coverage. That means with an existing GSM network we can meet at least the GPRS CS3 threshold for this network. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 57 6.2.5 GPRS Coverage for Paris within the periphery area for CS4 with 240 sites Figure 27: GPRS CS-4 coverage for 240 sites with 240 sites Coverage Coding Scheme-1 Level: -71.8 dBm Coding Scheme-2 Level: -68.1 dBm Coding Scheme-3 Level: -66.4 dBm Coding Scheme-4 Level: -58.7dBm GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 58 Figure 28: Details of the coverage for CS-4 The above table shows the covered area with the required threshold for GPRS Coding scheme 4 for different clutters. As we can see the covered area in the objective areas is shrinking comparing to the GSM coverage. That means we cannot meet the GPRS CS4 threshold for this network. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 59 7 Capacity Dimensioning The notion of running a new data service on residue capacity in the GSM network may seem at first to relegate GPRS to the status of a second class service. However, a few simple calculations will show us that the residue capacity in a typical cell is more than enough to provide a high level of service to IP traffic. Table 2 shows the capacity of a shared 4 carriers (30 channel) cell operating at a circuit switched blocking level of 1% - a typical design level. Cell capacity 30 channels Circuit switched capacity @ 1% blocking 20 Erlangs, i.e 20 channels average Resultant capacity for IP data traffic 10 channels Resultant end user IP throughput available 1 100kbit/s Note 1: assumes Coding Scheme 2 (CS2) ie approximately 10kbit/s per channel. Table 11: Typical loading capability of a GSM cell (4 carriers) What this tells us is that in a cell where we can support an average of 20 voice users we can also support a data throughput of 100kbit/s. If each of the data users requires an average throughput of 5kbit/s (not untypical in a bursty data environment) the cell can also support 20 data users. In practice since only 10-20% of data users will want to transfer data simultaneously, the peak data rate available per user will be in the region of 25 50kbit/s. This simplistic calculation needs to be refined to take account of the probability of multiple users all requiring instantaneous transmission of large files of data, but in practice when such occasions arise the end result will simply be that all users will experience slow data transfer, the files will still transfer successfully. Theoretically a GSM network having 2% blocking and having 1 TRX a sector will have traffic 2.9 Erlangs. This means there is 7 timeslots available for usage. A cell offering a circuit- switched load of 2.9 Erlangs with 7 circuits will, on average, have 4.1 spare circuits. However, there is a certain overhead associated with the division of the circuit-switched area and the GPRS area. Due to this reason by simulation tests done the available circuits for GPRS is reduced from 4.1 to 3.1 circuits. On the other hand if this overhead in not considered this will lead to adverse effects of increased blocking percentage. Therefore the mean free time slots in a circuit-switched environment will be 1. This can be extended to 14, 22 etc timeslots depending on the traffic with a blocking of 2% as shown in the table below. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 60 No of TRX (TCH) GSM Traffic @ 2% blocking (Erl) Mean free TCH for GPRS (2% blocking) Mean free Time Slots in Circuit Switch 1(7) 2.9 3.1 1.0 2(14) 8.2 4.3 1.5 3(22) 14.9 5.6 1.5 4(30) 21.9 5.6 2.5 5(38) 29.2 5.8 3.0 6(46) 36.5 6.5 3.0 7(54) 43.9 7.1 3.0 8(62) 51.5 6.5 4.0 Table 12: Mean free time slots for GPRS in a circuit-switch What the foregoing example tells us is that for a large number of cells in a GSM network, the existing capacity of the network will suffice to provide a good quality data service to a large community of data customers. In practice, the take-up of GPRS will not be instantaneous across the GSM customer base from day one, so it will be possible to monitor usage and performance as GPRS usage grows, to validate performance expectations. There are a number of cases where the existing capacity of a GSM network will not be sufficient to provide a satisfactory level of service to GPRS users: - In existing network hotspots, where the circuit switched network is congested. - In locations where high usage of GPRS data service is encountered (e.g. in- building cells) - In multilayer networks where one layer of the network is used in high utilization mode ie where the blocking level on circuit switched traffic is knowingly driven up in order to achieve high levels of channel utilization. In all these cases, additional carrier capacity must be provided to offer GPRS traffic suitable throughput. The real answer to the radio network dimensioning challenge will come from experience. Experience will tell us whether the busy hour for voice traffic (circuit switched) coincides with that for data traffic. Experience will also tell us whether the geographic spread of data usage matches that of voice. Finally, experience will tell us what sort of use customers make of GPRS, what sort of file sizes are transported, and what sort of speeds they require. Careful monitoring of loading and service levels experienced on GPRS in the growth phase of the service will enable dimensioning decisions to be made ahead of growth. All the foregoing analysis and discussion has assumed provision of equal performance across GPRS users on a GSM network. However, the GPRS standards proved for users to be given differential service levels. In particular, users may be offered a precedence class that promotes their data to first in the queue when encountering shared radio (or Core network) resources. Once this feature is developed by equipment vendors it will be possible to offer a subset of GPRS users premium service, guaranteeing high levels of throughput even if the cell they are in is heavily loaded. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 61 7.1 Network Performance The two major measures of GPRS performance are: Peak Throughput: the rate at which data is transferred Latency: the time taken for data packets to pass through the GPRS bearer 7.1.1 Peak Throughput An overview of GPRS peak throughputs based on the number of timeslosts available in GPRS handsets, and the Coding Schemes supported by the network is shown in Table 13. Timeslots CS-1 (kbps) Raw throughput/ Useable data CS-2 (kbps) Raw throughput/ Useable data 1 9.05/7.41 13.4/11.11 2 18.1/14.29 26.8/22.22 3 27.15/22.22 40.2/33.33 4 36.2/28.57 53.6/40 Table 13 Typical GPRS Peak Throughputs The key drivers for peak throughput are: Mobile terminal timeslots / available radio capacity Radio coding scheme Protocol overhead Radio blocking level Timeslots - As shown in the table, the number of timeslots (TS) that a mobile terminal has will drive the peak throughput. Initial GPRS terminals are expected to be on the order of 1 TS uplink and 2 TS downlink (1U/2D). Future handsets are likely to have at least 4 TS downlink, and perhaps multiple uplink TSs. It is also important to remember that the throughputs in Table 16 are peak throughputs and are only achievable if there is sufficient capacity available in the radio network support them. In busy times when multiple GSM and GPRS users are vying for the same timeslots, the actual throughput will vary and will often be well below the peak level. Coding Schemes - The second key driver of throughput is the radio interface coding scheme. As shown in Table 16, higher coding schemes offer greater throughputs. GPRS offers four coding schemes, but initial supplier GPRS radio infrastructure offerings are expected to be limited to CS-1 and CS-2. Higher CS coding levels also result in greater C/I levels which results in reduced coverage areas. For CS-2 the coverage area is not significantly lower that CS-1, but coverage is progressively reduced for CS-3 and CS-4. Due to the reliability of CS1 this coding scheme is always used for signalling packets. Whereas it is planned that a bursty data transfer always start with CS1 for the first data packets. The resource management shall use a higher CS if it is possible. The actual performance of each of these CS is dependent upon the chanel C/I. The GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 62 interference has an influence to the BER. That means data services have specific minimum and optimum C/I requirements. These requirements are higher than for voice. The figure shows the possible throughput for the different CS as a function of the C/I. Fig. 29: Data throughput Vs C/I for GPRS coding schemes All four coding schemes are based on a standard GPRS coded block of 425 bits, which consists of the Uplink State Flag (USF), the user data block (which is of varying size depending on the coding scheme being used) and a Block Check Sequence (BCS for error detection). For CS1, CS2 and CS3, this radio block is then further coded with a rate convolutional code. For CS2 & CS3 this is then punctured (some of the resulting bits of the code are removed) in order to return the total coded length back to 456 bits for transmission. For CS4, no forward error correction code is used and the only error checking is the BCS. The full parameters of the coding schemes are shown in Table 14 below, together with the achieved raw user data rates. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 63 Coding Scheme Code rate USF bits Pre- coded USF bits Radio Block bits excl. USF and BCS BCS bits Tail bits Coded bits Punctured bits Raw User Data rate kb/s CS-1 3 3 181 40 4 456 0 9.05 CS-2 2/3 3 6 268 16 4 588 132 13.4 CS-3 3/4 3 6 312 16 4 676 220 15.6 CS-4 1 3 12 428 16 - 456 - 21.4 Table 14: Coding Parameters for the Coding Schemes. 7.2 System C/I Profile and Mean Data Rate per Channel The C/I for a given user will depend on the location within the cell. Depending on the C/I ratio and the frequency reuse factor, the probability of the C/I range within the cell for each reuse factor can be compared. Taking into consideration of a lognormal fading (Standard deviation of 7) simulation tests show typical C/I distributions for different reuse patterns. This is show in the figure 30 below. Figure 30: C/I distribution, 3-sector sites, 65 degree antennas, K=3,9 and 12 Also the data rate depends on the C/I and the coding schemes used. The figure 31 below shows the comparison of data rates for different C/I intervals. GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 64 Figure 31: Typical data rate per C/I interval Considering the probability and data rate for each C/I interval the mean data rate can be calculated using the formula shown. p r i i i D
= The results of the above formula are tabulated in the Table Y below showing for omni, sector, reuse patterns and the data rate for the coding schemes. Configuration Mean data rate (optimum) kbps (CS-1 and 2) Mean data rate (optimum) kbps (CS-1, 2, 3 and 4) Omni, K=3 9.8 12.4 Omni, K=9 12.5 17.3 Omni, K=12 12.8 18.2 3-Sector, K=3 11.4 15.1 3-Sector, K=9 12.9 18.7 3-Sector, K=12 13.1 19.3 Table 15: Mean data rate per channel for different coding schemes and configurations GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 65 Protocol Overhead This causes the true user throughput to be significantly less than the peak raw throughput. The raw user data rates assume an error free channel, and exclude any higher layer protocol overheads, such as TCP/IP, and the link establishment and control overheads. Therefore, the true peak user throughput rates for any of these coding schemes will be lower, as shown earlier in Table 14. An overview of the GPRS protocols that impact the useable peak data rate is shown below in Table 16. CS2, 2 TS CS2, 4 TS Application Data 20.44kb/s 40.88 kb/s TCP/IP 22.2 kb/s 44.44 kb/s SNDCP 22.32 kb/s 44.64 kb/s Logical Link 22.62 kb/s 45.24 kb/s Radio Link 23.2 kb/s 46.4 kb/s Radio Layer 26.8 kb/s 53.6 kb/s Table 16 : Impact of GPRS protocol overheads on peak throughput By adding headers and error detection trailers, each protocol reduces the effective amount of useable data that is transmitted with a given packet. The method used for the numbers quoted in Table 6 for useable data is the throughput that includes the TCP/IP overhead. This is consistent with data rates quoted for other Internet communications; however, TCP/IP itself adds a 40 bytes header per packet, leaving the final peak throughout of actual application data at 6.81 kbps for CS-1 or 10.22 kbps for CS-2, assuming no header compression. Radio Blocking Finally, the actual useable peak throughput will be influenced by the quality of the radio environment. The numbers for useable throughput described in this section is all based on an ideal radio environment. The useable throughput achieved in a real world radio environment is likely to be less than this, and can vary widely at different times and locations in the network based on radio blocking levels and number of required re-transmissions. 7.2.1 Latency The major elements of latency and representative latency figures are provided below in Table 17. Latency Element Uplink TBF Establishment 1TS Ongoing Uplink Latency 1 TS Downlink TBF Establishment 2TS Ongoing Downlink Latency 2TS MS Delay 250 ms 100 ms 150 ms 150 ms TBF Establishment 400 ms 0 1000 ms 0 GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 66 Over the Air Delay 400 ms 400 ms 200 ms 200 ms SGSN/GGSN Latency 50 ms 50 ms 50 ms 50 ms Total 1.1 seconds 0.55 seconds 1.4 seconds 0.4 seconds Table 17: GPRS Latency Examples for 1 TS Uplink, and 2TS Downlink These latency calculations are from the Mobile Station (MS) to the Gi GGSN interface to external networks. Any delays in external to the GPRS network from interconnections via the Internet or in application processing are not included. In this example, a round trip ping which measures the time to send a packet to a server outside the network and receive a response, the total time would be at approximately 2.5 seconds (1.1 uplink plus 1.4 downlink). Based on a 500 ms variance, a round trip ping should generally take 2-3 seconds since radio resources must be allocated for a one time ping. Subsequent transfers would only require about one second round trip as long as the radio resources are allocated to GPRS, since Temporary Block Flow (TBF) establishment would not be necessary. The actual latency experienced by the user could also vary based on the specific way the infrastructure is implemented by suppliers and the applications accessed. More operational experience is required to understand which types of applications will require frequent TBF set-ups and hence have greater latency. The key elements of GPRS latency are defined below: RLC Block Error Rate - the time taken to retransmit erroneous information due to errors caused by the hostile radio environment. This rate is highly variable depending on radio conditions. For the purposes of the examples in Table 17, ideal radio conditions are assumed and no delay is accounted for. Mobile Station (MS) delay - the time taken by the Mobile Station (MS) to process an IP datagram and request radio resource. This includes the delay from the PC to MS, and the MS processing time. This delay is typically less than 100ms, with the exception of the processing to establish a request for an uplink TBF channel, which could be in the order of 100-200 ms. Temporary Block Flow (TBF) Establishment/Cleardown Time - the time it takes the BSS/PCU to provide and release the radio resources required by the user to enable data transfer to take place in either the uplink or downlink. This only occurs on the first transmission, and is not required for subsequent transmissions as long as the resources are allocated to GPRS. The time for TBF establishment can be on the order of 500 ms to 1s and is independent upon the amount of data to be transferred. Throughput over the air delay - the rate at which user data is physically transmitted from the MS to the SGSN once a TBF is established. This delay is directly related to the size of the IP datagram being sent. The smaller the packet sizes the shorter the delay. For GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 67 the examples used we are assuming an MTU (Message Transmission Unit) of 400- 600 kbytes for a 400ms delay for 1 TS. This delay is proportionally reduced for multiple timeslot MSs. SGSN/GGSN delay - the delay for the packet to transit through the SGSN and GGSN. This should be almost negligible, and is assumed to be less than 50ms. 8 Capacity case study Generic impact of the migration of GSM towards GPRS on capacity The report investigates GPRS migration and its impact on existing GSM network capacity. The following example aims to shed light on the various options available to the network planners. Assumptions The city comprises of 30,000 subscribers A city is covered by 9 base stations regularly located in a grid (3x3) Each base station is 3-sectored with 3 TRXs per sector Traffic demand is almost uniform geographically 20mErlang per subscriber during busy hour- GSM 2% blocking probability For GPRS Coding schemes 1 & 2 will be offered 8.1 Case one: Adding TRXs without considering dedicated TSLs to GPRS users There are 9 sites (all with three sectors). So the number of the subscribers per sector will be: 30000 / 27 = 1111.1111 Subscribers The required traffic per sector: 1111.1111 x 20 mE = 22.2222 Erlangs/ sector Considering 2% blocking, from the Erlang B table 14.9 Erlangs can offered with 3 TRXs per sector. However the traffic offered is 22.22 Erlangs. Therefore the network suffers GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 68 with a 15.7% blocking which is not acceptable. So we need to increase the TRXs to meet the required blocking. According to the Erlang-B equation we can offer a 21.9 Erlangs traffic with 4 TRXs for 2% blocking. The traffic offered is 22.22 Erlangs. This is very close to our need but is still not enough. So lets try to find how many more TRXs we need after adding one TRX to each sector. With 4 TRXs/sec sites we will offer: 21.9 x 27= 591.3 Erlangs traffic offered While the demand for traffic is: 30000 x 0.020 = 600 Erlang That means we still need to offer 8.7 Erlangs more: 600 591.3 = 8.7 Erlangs for offering an additional of 8.7 Erlang we need to change some of the sectors to 5TRXs from 4TRXs. Any change from 4TRXs to 5TRXs gives us 7.3 Erlang more for that sector: 29.2 [the traffic offered by 5TRXs] 21.9 [the traffic offered by 5TRXs] = 7.3 Erlangs more 8.7 [the required traffic] / 7.3 = 1.4 sectors or approximately 2 sectors. In other words 2 sectors will have to be upgraded with 5 TRXs. This can be achieved by adding only two more TRXs in total. (i.e. all the sectors should be up graded to 4 TRXs except two of them that should be 5 TRXs). In fact, in a real network we usually dont have a uniform traffic and it is very likely to have more traffic in some regions. In that case, with taking the statistics into account these two sectors can be chosen. 8.1.1 GPRS migration According to Table 12 the number of free time slots in a circuit switched territory for 4TRXs sectors we have to leave 2.5 TSLs in order to not to exceed 2% blocking during GPRS usage. We have then: TSL available for GPRS = Total channels - used traffic - 2.5 = 30 - 21.9 - 2.5 = 5.6 Timeslots available for GPRS The mean data rate per Timeslot for CS1 & CS2 having the frequency reuse configuration of 3 sec./ 9 is 12.9 kbps. That means: GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 69 Total Data Rate in Cell = 12.9 x 5.6 = 72.24 kbps (in busy hour) According to the number of free time slots in a circuit switched territory for 5TRXs sectors we have to leave 3 TSLs in order not to exceed 2% blocking during GPRS usage. We have then: TSL available for GPRS = Total channels - used traffic - 3 = 38 (21.9 + 8.7/2) - 3 = 8.7 Timeslots available for GPRS in the 5TRXs sectors That means: Total Data Rate in Cell = 12.9 x 8.7 = 112.23 kbps (in busy hour) 8.2 Case two: Adding TRXs with considering two dedicated TSLs to GPRS users In this case we consider two dedicated TSLs for each sector. There are 9 sites (all with three sectors). So the number of the subscribers per sector will be: 30000 / 27 = 1111.1111 Subscribers The required traffic per sector: 1111.1111 x 20 mE = 22.2222 Erlangs/ sector Considering 2% blocking, from the Erlang B table 14.9 Erlangs are offered with 3 TRXs per sector. From the previous analysis this network suffered from 15.7% blocking which is not acceptable. Again the situation will be even worse with the GPRS usage. Because after assigning two TSLs for GPRS, GSM traffic will we left out with 20 TSLs which causes 21.5% blocking. So we need to increase the TRXs to meet the required blocking. The number of available TSLs for GSM after dedicating two channels for GPRS will be: Considering 4 TRXs per sector Available TSLs for GSM= 32 2 [for control channels] 2 [for GPRS] = 28 TSLs According to the Erlang-B equation we can offer a 20.2 Erlangs traffic with 4 TRXs (28 TSLs) for 2% blocking. This is close to our need but is still not enough. So lets try to find how many more TRXs we need after adding one TRX to each sector. With 4 TRXs/sec sites we will offer: 20.2 x 27= 545.4 Erlangs traffic offered GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 70 While the demand for traffic is: 30000 x 0.020 = 600 Erlang That means we still need to offer 54.6 Erlangs more: 600 545.4 = 54.6 Erlangs The available TSLs for GSM with 5 TRXs are: Available TSLs for GSM= 40 2 [for control channels] 2 [for GPRS] = 36 TSLs According to the Erlang-B equation we can offer a 27.4 Erlangs traffic with 5 TRXs (36 TSLs) for 2% blocking. Which 20.2 of it is already considered. That means for each sector with 5 TRXs 7.2 more Erlangs is offered. The no. of the 5 TRXs sectors can be found then: 27.4 [Erlangs offered by 5TRXs] 20.2 [Erlangs offered by 4TRXs] = 7.2 [Erlangs added] And: Number of Sectors with 5 TRXs = 54.6 / 7.2 = 7.6 (or 8 sectors) 8.2.1 GPRS migration According to the Table 12 number of free time slots in a circuit switched territory for 4TRXs sectors we have to leave 2.5 TSLs in order to not to exceed 2% blocking during GPRS usage. We have then: TSL available for GPRS = Total channels - used traffic - 2.5 = 30 20.2 - 2.5 = 7.3 Timeslots available for GPRS The mean data rate per Timeslot for CS1 & CS2 having the frequency reuse configuration of 3 sec./ 9 is 12.9 kbps. That means: Total Data Rate in Cell = 12.9 x 7.3 = 94.17 kbps (in GSM busy hour) According to the number of free time slots in a circuit switched territory for 5TRXs sectors we have to leave 3 TSLs to not to exceed 2% blocking during GPRS usage. We have then: TSL available for GPRS = Total channels - used traffic - 3 = 38 (20.2 + 54.6/8) - 3 GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 71 = 7.975 Timeslots available for GPRS in the 5TRXs sectors That means: Total mean Data Rate in Cell = 12.9 x 7.975 = 102.88 kbps (in busy hour) For both 4 TRX sectors and 5 TRX sectors we will have the minimum data rate of: 12.9 x 2 [dedicated TSLs to GPRS] = 25.8 kbps 8.3 Case three: Adding new sites with considering two dedicated TSLs to GPRS users The demanded traffic is: 0.020 x 30000 =600 Erlangs The offered traffic is: 13.2 [for 20 TSLs] x 27 [sectors] = 356.4 Erlangs so we need to offer 243.6 Erlangs more: 600 356.4 = 243.6 Erlangs Then the required no. of sites (based on 3 TRXs per sector) will be: 243.6 / (13.2 x 3) = 6.15 Sites (or 7 sites) 8.3.1 GPRS migration The traffic handled by each sector is: 600 [demanded traffic] / (9 + 7) x 3 = 12.5 Erlangs According to the Table 12 number of free time slots in a circuit switched territory for 3TRXs sectors we have to leave 1.5 TSLs in order to not to exceed 2% blocking during GPRS usage. We have then: TSL available for GPRS = Total channels - used traffic - 1.5 = 24 2 [control] 12.5 [used traffic] - 1.5 = 8 Timeslots available for GPRS The mean data rate per Timeslot for CS1 & CS2 having the frequency reuse configuration of 3 sec./ 9 is 12.9 kbps. That means: Total mean Data Rate in Cell = 12.9 x 8 = 103.2 kbps (in GSM busy hour) GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 72 And the minimum data rate will be: 12.9 x 2 [dedicated TSLs to GPRS] = 25.8 kbps 9 Mobiles availability Availability of GPRS handsets, which include: GSM/GPRS mobile Internet phones, Personal Digital Assistants with the GSM/GPRS PC Card modem or with a GSM/GPRS mobile Internet phone used as a modem and GSM/GPRS PC Card modems, is a big factor. There are expected to be many more GPRS enabled phones coming to market over the next six months. However, more critical right now to the development of the GPRS market is the availability of GPRS-enabled PDAs and other hand-held computing devices. To date none of the popular PDA devices on the market has a network approved GPRS enabled version commercially available. Given the expectation that the GPRS market will build initially around business applications, this is a problem. In the table below shows the available GPRS hand sets in the market. 9.1 Worldwide GPRS Terminals and Handsets 9/25/01 Vendor Model Frequency Available Alcatel One Touch 502 One Touch 700 702 900/1800 900/1800 900/1800 Q2 2001 Q4 2001 Q4 2001 Audiovox GP710 Yes Ericsson R520 R600 T39 T65 T68 900/1800/1900 900/1800 900/1800/1900 900/1800 900/1800/1900 Yes Q4 2001 / Q1 2002 Yes Q4 2001 Q4 2001 GTran Wireless Dot Surfer PCMCIA Wireless Dot Surfer PCMCIA 1800 only 900/1800/1900 Q3 2001 Q4 2001 Maxon MX 7810 EGSM 900/GSM 1800 Q4 2001 Mitsubishi / Trium Trium G360 Trium G520 Trium GT550 Trium Eclipse Trium Geo GPRS 900/1800 900/1800 900/1800 900/1800 900/1800 Q3 2001 Q1 2002 Q1 2002 Available Available GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 73 Trium Mondo Trium Sirius 900/1800 900/1800 Available Available Motorola Accompli 008 Accompli 009 Talkabout 192 Timeport 260 Timeport 280 Timeport P7382i Timeport P7389i V. Series 66 V. Series 120 900/1800/1900 900/1800/1900 900/1800/1900 900/1800/1900 900/1800/1900 1900 only 900/1800/1900 900/1800/1900 900/1800/1900 Yes Q4 2001 Q3 2001 Yes Q3 2001 Yes Yes Q3 2001 Q4 2001 NEC DB4300 DB7000 900/1800 900/1800 Q4 2001 Q4 2001 Nokia 6310 8310 900/1800 900/1800 Q4 2001 Q3 2001 Novatel Merlin G100 PCMCIA Merlin G100 PCMCIA 1900 only 900/1800 Q2 2001 Q3 2001 Panasonic GD95 GD96 900/1800 Yes Q4 2001 / Q1 2002 Philips Fisio 610 Fisio 611 Fisio 612 Xenium 9660 900/1800 Q3 2001 Q1 2002 Q1 2002 Q3 2201 Pogo GPRS SmartPhone Q4 2001 Sagem MC850 MW 959 MWX1 900/1800 900/1800 900/1800 Q4 2001 Yes Q4 2001 Samsung SGH-Q100 900/1800 Yes Sendo Z100 900/1800/1900 Q4 2001 Sharp Zaurus Q4 2001 Siemens ME45 S45 EGSM 900/GSM 1800 EGSM 900/GSM 1800 Yes Yes Xircom PCMCIA modem Q3 2001 GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 74 SIEMENS, S45 Siemens first GPRS Phone, the S45, is an innovative mobile business tool with an outstanding performance via high-speed data transfer and flexible memory GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 75 ERICSSON, T39 The T39 was first launched on the Swedish and Italian markets. Reaction from consumers has been positive. T39 has plenty of features of interest to a broad market. To date, the T39 is available in stores all over Europe. And it will become available on the Asian and U.S. markets shortly. NOKIA, 6310 Availability: Europe, Africa, Asia Pacific Key features: GPRS, HSCSD, Bluetooth, WAP 1.2.1, voice recorder, voice commands, voice dialing Operating frequency: EGSM 900/1800 networks in Europe, Africa and Asia Pacific GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 76 NOKIA, 8310 Availability: Europe, Africa, Asia Pacific Key features: Latest look and feel, WAP over GPRS, integrated FM radio, user changeable front and back covers, voice features Operating frequency: EGSM 900/1800 networks in Europe, Africa, and Asia Pacific MOTOROLA, P7389i Microbrowser for web access (01) on the go Tri-band GSM 900/1800/1900 MHz networks (provides roaming in select cities in Europe, Asia or America) Built-In Microbrowser - access Directions, Stock quotes, and Airline information, all wireless! (01) iTAP software for simplified text entry - anticipates the word you are trying to spell when entering text in email, short messages or other edit modes. Supports European Operators Standard - SMG 31 International Access GPRS RF Optimization Report Ver 4.0 Copyright 2000 Wireless Facilities, Inc. - EMEA Confidential- Internal Use Only 77 SAMSUNG, SGH-Q100 Multy Slot: Class 8 (1Tx, 4Rx) LCD display: 4 Gray Graphic, 128x128 pixels up to 6 lines Wap 1.1 Wap Interactive game PC synchronization using easy GPRS-SMS edit Data communication with PC using the RS-232C cable