Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Application of CFD in Prediction of Indoor Building Thermal Performance As An Effective Pre-Design Tool Towards Sustainability
Application of CFD in Prediction of Indoor Building Thermal Performance As An Effective Pre-Design Tool Towards Sustainability
C
)
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
H
u
m
i
d
i
t
y
(
%
)
Kuching 2012 :Mean Monthly Air Temperature (C) and
Relative Humidity (%)
Relative Humidity (%) Dry Bulb Temperature (C)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
JAN FEB MAC APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
W
i
n
d
S
p
e
e
d
(
K
m
/
h
)
G
l
o
b
a
l
R
a
d
i
a
t
i
o
n
(
W
/
m
h
)
Kuching 2012: Mean Monthly Global Radiation (Wh/m)
& Wind Speed (Km/h)
Global Radiation (Wh/m) Wind Speed (Km/h)
Figure 3: The maximum monthly air temperature (C) & relative humidity (%)
Figure 4: The maximum monthly global radiation (Wh/m) & Wind speed (Km/h)
According to figure 1, the variations of air temperature control the evaporation of
water into the air and it regulate the air humidity and saturation. Under the
unsaturated condition, the air temperature is inversely proportional to the relative
humidity. Figure 3 shows the maximum monthly air temperature and humidity in
Kuching in year 2012. The highest air temperature within year 2012 reported as
35C which appear during April, May, June, August and September while the
maximum relative humidity reported as 100% throughout the year.
1.3 Typical terrace housing in Malaysia
The field experiment was conducted at a single storey terrace house in
Kuching, Sarawak. The growth of the Sarawaks property market since 2010 has
shown the positive sign in the Malaysia housing stock. There was 65% take up rate
and 10 to 15% new launches on the recent projects in year 2010, reported by
Sarawak Housing & Real Estate Developers Association. Nearly over half of the
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
JAN FEB MAC APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
A
i
r
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
H
u
m
i
d
i
t
y
(
%
)
Kuching 2012: The Maximum Monthly Air Temperature
(C) & Relative Humidity (%)
Relative Humidity (%) Air Temperature (C)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1500
1550
1600
1650
1700
1750
1800
1850
1900
JAN FEB MAC APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
W
i
n
d
S
p
e
e
d
(
K
m
/
h
)
G
l
o
b
a
l
R
a
d
i
a
t
i
o
n
(
W
h
/
m
)
Kuching 2012: The Maximum Monthly Global Radiation
(Wh/m) & Wind Speed (Km/h)
Global Radiation (Wh/m) Wind Speed (Km/h)
new projects in 2010 located at Kuching city area, which means that large numbers
of the young Sarawakians and expatriates entering the market have injected more
demands on the housing at capital of Sarawak. (Oxford, 2011) The increase of the
housing demands has aroused the attention of the developers, who goes for better
architectural design with economical solutions. Thus, field experiment is necessary
to understand the current thermal performance of the typical terrace housing. (Figure
5) The typical terrace house as shown in figure 5 is facing north. The typical size is
about 17m in depth and 6m in width are divided by a 6m width road.
Figure 5: Location (left) and outlook (right) of Field Experiment House in
Kuching, Sarawak
2.0 Research Methodology
This study involved the field measurement and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) to
predict and estimate the thermal performance. The methodology of the study was
carried out in the followings flow:
2.1 Field Measurement
The field measurement of the study was carried out in 16 May 2012 from
12am to 11pm in the single storey terrace house located in Yen Yen Housing area,
Matang in Kuching, Sarawak. The field survey is to determine the environmental
condition of a typical terrace house in Malaysia. The house comprises of 3 rooms
and a shared living and dining area. The window of the test room is facing the south
Measurement
field
measurement
to obtain the
thermal
performance
of existing
terrace house
Validation
Validation of
the CFD
software by
using the field
measurement
result
Prediction
Prediction of
thermal
performance
of the
modified air
well and
room in CFD
while the living and master bedroom is facing north. In this case study house, living
cum dining space received ventilation from front and back window while master
bedroom and room 2 experience single sided ventilation. Other than that, room 1 is
considered as intermediate room, which is dependent on the openings facing the
internal space to gain ventilation. The air well is located between bedroom 1 and
bedroom 2, however, only bedroom 2 attached to the air well. Sliding windows (1.5m
height and 1.5m width, 0.8m above the floor) were installed at all rooms except
window at bedroom 2 which attached to air well, where the louvres windows (1.2m
width and 1.5m height) were installed. In addition, the bathrooms openings are
above the ceiling level (dotted line as stated in figure 6). The case study house is
separated by 230mm thick party wall and the all walls are not insulated for heat
transmission. The internal walls and structure wall are built with 150mm and 200mm
thick brick respectively. The roofing of the case study house was made from clay
tiles while insulated with aluminum sheets. All the external windows was opened
during day time and closed from 12am to 7am for security purpose. The measuring
instruments were set up at outdoor and indoor as stated in the table 1.0 and figure 6.
The results from the measuring were input into the CFD simulation for accurate
calculation on prediction of thermal performance in the next step.
Figure 6: Position of measuring instruments: global weather station ( ),
HOBO U12 temperature and humidity logger (O), HOBO U12 air velocity logger
(X)
Space Data Type Equipment Time
Interval
Measuring
Point
Master
bedroom
Air temperature
Relative humidity
HOBOware
U12 air
temperature
and relative
humidity data
logger
15 minutes 1.5m from
floor level
Bedroom 1 Air temperature
Relative humidity
Air velocity
HOBOware
U12 air
temperature
and relative
humidity data
logger & air
velocity data
logger
15 minutes 1.5m from
floor level
Air well Air temperature
Relative humidity
Air velocity
HOBOware
U12 air
temperature
and relative
humidity data
logger & air
velocity data
logger
15 minutes 1.5m from
floor level
Bedroom 2 Air temperature
Relative humidity
HOBOware
U12 air
temperature
and relative
humidity data
logger
15 minutes 1.5m from
floor level
Living + Dining Air temperature
Relative humidity
HOBOware
U12 air
temperature
and relative
humidity data
logger
15 minutes 1.5m from
floor level
Outdoor Air temperature
Relative humidity
Solar radiation
Wind velocity
Wind direction
HOBOware
U30 weather
station
15 minutes 2m from
floor level
Table 1: Measuring instrument details and method
In this study, there are 3 types of measuring instrument involved: the HOBO U30
global weather station which used to measure the wind velocity, wind direction, solar
radiation, air temperature and relative humidity; HOBO U12 air temperature and
humidity loggers which were installed at master bedroom, air well, dining and living
space, bedroom 1 and bedroom 2 while HOBO U12 air velocity logger were placed
at air well and bedroom 2. All the measuring instruments were calibrated with the
thermal data logger prior to the experiment to ensure the reliable result for the field
measurement were obtained. All the indoor measuring instruments were placed
1.5m above the floor and the global weather station was placed 2m above the floor.
The time intervals for the measuring instrument logging were set 15 minutes apart
from 12am to 11pm of 16 May 2012. However, the focus of discussion only scope
into outdoor climate condition, air well and bedroom 2 from 8am to 7pm.
2.2 CFD Simulation
In this study, in order to predict the thermal performance of the modified air
well based on the existing air well, CFD simulation plays an important role. Validation
of CFD software based on the field experiment results has been done by
researchers before proceed with the research experiment. (Bangalee et al., 2013,
Evola and Popov, 2006, Mohammad Baharvand et al., 2013)
Designbuilder was chosen as the CFD simulation software in this study. Some
literature has validated this CFD software and the result is reliable.(DesignBuilder,
2012, Mohammad Baharvand et al., 2013) Designbuilder is developed by
EnergyPlus, which is the U.S. DOE building energy simulation program for building
modeling task such as ventilation, cooling, heating, energy flows and so forth.
(DesignBuilder, 2013) The initial condition of the simulation was input with the field
experiment result in stage 1, which obtained from 8am to 7pm of 16 May 2012 in
Kuching, Sarawak (as shown in table 2).
Time Air Temperature (C) Humidity
(%)
Wind Speed
(m/s)
Solar
radiation
(Wh/m)
Wind
Direction ()
8am 24.1 100 0 30 160
9am 25.4 97 0.03 760 160
10am 27 90 0 730 140
11am 32 80 0.1 881 120
12pm 32 72 0.2 992 140
1pm 32 64 0.1 1000 120
2pm 33.2 63 0.14 760 130
3pm 33.5 45 0 852 180
4pm 35 33 0.02 510 0
5pm 34 30 0.1 311 200
6pm 30 89 0 112 140
7pm 30 96 0 25 160
Table 2: Field Measurement Input Data for CFD simulation obtained from
HOBO U30 weather station at 16 May 2012
In this study, the scope of experiment concentrate on the air well and
bedroom 2, which is the room attached with air well and ventilated by single-sided
opening. A layer of adiabatic component was modelled at the external surface of air
well and bedroom, which is being used when the modelled space has similar
conditions in term of shading, reflection and visualisation with adjacent space. Other
than that, it could also reduce the complexity of the model and saving the simulation
time. The boundary condition of CFD program was brought over from the simulation
results. Designbuilder applied domain-decoupled technique that separating the
simulation of external airflow fields and internal airflow fields. (Jiru.E.T and
Bitsuamlak.G.T, 2010) Furthermore, in the technical option setting, calculated
module is preferred over scheduled module where the natural ventilation and
infiltration are calculated based on the total window openings and natural ventilation
criteria. CFD in Designbuilder applied Cartesian type-grid system. In this study, the
total amount of cells generated from this grid system is 32 numbers (x-direction) x 49
numbers (y-direction) x 51numbers (z-direction) with max ratio 14.83. The calculation
in CFD applied the standard k- turbulent model with 5000 iterations.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Field measurement results: outdoor climate condition and indoor thermal
environment
In order to understand the thermal performance of the indoor environment, the
outdoor climatic condition should be given the priority in research since the indoor
environment very much dependent on the outdoor climate condition. According to
figure 7, the outdoor air temperature reached 35C at 4pm and during this hour the
relative humidity was only 33%. Inverse condition happened when the air
temperature at its lowest, which is 24.1C at 8am where the humidity was 100%.
According to (Humphreys et al., 2011) the neutral air temperature needs to be
maintained at 26 to 28C. Thus, from the recorded data, 8am to 10am were
considered as comfort condition and it maintain the comfort level of indoor
environment. The solar radiation reached the highest intensity at 12pm and 1pm,
which are 992 Wh/m and 1000Wh/m respectively on 16 May 2012. The outdoor air
velocity pattern fluctuated between 0 m/s to 0.2m/s. The outdoor air flow is more
dynamic during afternoon (0.1 0.2m/s from 11am to 2pm) and more static at late
evening (0 0.1m/s at night time). More than 90% of the wind originates from south
west south direction. Thus, utilization of prevailing wind direction to improve
ventilation could be an alternative. However, wind getting weak when it flows near to
the ground. Thus, wind driven ventilation in the indoor environment could be
challenging in Malaysia.
Figure 7: Measured Outdoor, Bedroom2 and Air well Air temperature and
Relative Humidity on 16 May 2012
Figure 8: Measured Outdoor, Bedroom 2 and Air well Air velocity and wind
direction on 16 May 2012
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
8am 9am 10am 11am 12pm 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm
A
i
r
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
h
u
m
i
d
i
t
y
(
%
)
Measured Outdoor, Bedroom 2 and Air well Air Temperature (C) and
Relative Humidity (%) on 16 May 2012
Outdoor Air temperature (C) Bedroom 2 Air temperature (C)
Air well Air temperature (C) Air well Relative humidity (%)
Outdoor Relative humidity (%) Bedroom 2 Relative humidity (%)
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
8am 9am 10am 11am 12pm 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm
W
i
n
d
D
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
(
)
A
i
r
v
e
l
o
c
i
t
y
(
m
/
s
)
Measured Outdoor, Bedroom 2 and Air well Air velocity (m/s) and wind
direction () on 16 May 2012
Outdoor Air velocity (m/s) Bedroom 2 Air velocity (m/s)
Air well Air velocity (m/s) Wind Direction ()
Figure 9: Measured Solar Radiation on 16 May 2012
For the indoor environment, generally the air temperature in the bedroom was
lower compared to the outdoor temperature. The average air temperature of
bedroom from 8am to 7pm is 0.87% lower than the average outdoor temperature.
The average air well temperature is 6.51C higher compared to the outdoor due to
the radiation which heat up the building fabric. This helps the air well to create
temperature differences on the top and indoor to accelerate the wind speed. The
relative humidity of the indoor environment slightly higher compared to the outdoor
environment, especially the bedroom. The highest humidity recorded as 100% during
daytime before 10am while the lowest recorded as 33% where the air temperature
was at its peak. The air velocity of the bedroom maintained in 0 to 0.02m/s while the
air well air velocity fluctuated from 0.016 to 0.039m/s around 3pm to 5pm.
3.2 Validation of CFD: bedroom 2 as case study
Validation of the CFD model with the field experiment was carried out by
comparing the air temperature and air well of the bedroom2. Percentage of deviation
was calculated and shows in the figure 10, 11 and 12. Generally, the CFD simulation
results show the differences less than 10% for both air temperature and air velocity.
The air temperature shows the maximum differences of 8.54% between
outdoor and bedroom at 12pm while 90% of the time the air velocity shows the
highest deviation at 10% between the measured and simulated results. According to
(Nugroho, 2007) within the range of 10%, the simulation software is accepted as the
research tool. Therefore, the use of Designbuilder as thermal performance prediction
tool in the building is validated.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
8am 9am 10am 11am 12pm 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm
S
o
l
a
r
r
a
d
i
a
t
i
o
n
(
W
h
/
m
)
Measured Solar Radiation (Wh/m) on 16 May 2012
Outdoor Solar Radiation (Wh/m)
Figure 10: Comparison of the bedroom 2 temperature result between field
measurement and simulation on 16 May 2012
Figure 11: Comparison of the bedroom 2 relative humidity result between field
measurement and simulation on 16 May 2012
-50
-30
-10
10
30
50
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
8am 9am 10am 11am 12pm 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm
D
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
(
%
)
A
i
r
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Comparison of the bedroom 2 temperature result between field
measurement and simulation on 16 May 2012
Measured Air temperature (C) Simulated Air Temperature (C) Deviation (%)
-50
-30
-10
10
30
50
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
8am 9am 10am 11am 12pm 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm
D
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
(
%
)
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
h
u
m
i
d
i
t
y
(
%
)
Comparison of the bedroom 2 relative humidity result between field
measurement and simulation on 16 May 2012
Measured Relative humidity (%) Simulated Relative humidity (%) Deviation (%)
Figure 12: Comparison of the bedroom 2 air velocity result between field
measurement and simulation on 16 May 2012
3.3 Prediction of new air well model: improve the indoor thermal environment
The air velocity and air temperature in this stage were calculated using CFD
simulation at 4pm on 16 may 2012 since the highest air temperature of 35C was
recorded. The average air velocity and air temperature was recorded at 1.5m from
the floor. According to table 3, five geometries air well: 0.5 x 0.5m, 1 x 0.5m, 1 x 1m,
2 x 0.5m and 2 x 1m were simulated. All models were tested under no wind condition
from outdoor environment. Great turbulence happened on the existing air well model,
where the air velocity could hit 0.11 to 0.13 m/s under buoyancy thermal condition
but the bedroom temperature is the highest among 4 other models and similar to
outdoor temperature, which is 35.04C. The differences of air temperature between
air well and room for the existing model (2 x 1m) is the highest, which is 0.8C.
Model 0.5x0.5m gives the dynamic air velocity differences between two spaces,
which is 60% differences between air well and bedroom. Higher pressure in the
narrow shaft inlet creates higher pressure and causes the air change the direction
when it reached the shaft opening which attached to the room. However, the narrow
shaft limits the up flow turbulence from the air well outlets. Thus the convective
turbulence flow within the room is weak compared to the original model.
The 0.5 x 0.5m model gives the lowest bedroom temperature among 5
geometries, which is 30.74C. This is due to the solar gain from the radiation and
convection is lower in narrow shaft compared to the wide opening on the air well
shaft. Among 5 geometries, model 2 x 1m shows the highest air temperature and air
velocity in both air well and bedroom, which are 0.039 m/s and 0.035m/s as well as
35.89C and 35.04C respectively while model 0.5x 0.5m gives the lowest air
temperature in both air well and bedroom, which is 30.74C and 30.69C. However,
model 0.5x0.5m shows the lowest air velocity in bedroom while model 1x0.5m shows
the lowest air velocity in air well. This phenomenon shows that the greater depth of
the air well is preferable for turbulence to occur.
-50
-30
-10
10
30
50
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
8am 9am 10am 11am 12pm 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm
D
e
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
(
%
)
A
i
r
v
e
l
o
c
i
t
y
(
m
/
s
)
Comparison of the bedroom 2 air velocity result between field measurement
and simulation on 16 May 2012
Measured Air velocity (m/s) Simulated Air velocity (m/s) Deviation (%)
Figure 13: Air velocity (m/s) and air temperature (C) generated by 5 air well
geometry sizes on 4pm at 16 May 2012
According to figure 13, air velocity of the room and air well is inversely
proportional while the air temperature for both is similar and dependent on each
other. This could be influenced by the height of the air well, where solar radiation and
convection happened and directly warm up the air in the room from the air well.
Generally, air velocity in the air well is higher compared to the room since the warm
air at the top of air well shaft heated by radiation via the building skin resulting in
temperature differences. From the five geometries, model 2 x 0.5m shows ideal
result since both air well and room have the lowest temperature, which is 30.95C
and 30.87C respectively among others and the air velocity for air well and bedroom
shows the great differences, which is 0.038m/s and 0.017m/s. The findings shows
that the air well with rectangular form tends to accelerate the air velocity in the air
well compared to the uniform geometry. This means that the rectangular geometry
has higher potential to reduce the heat gain directly from the solar radiation and in
the same time could accelerate the buoyancy air flow speed in the air well shaft.
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.5x0.5 1x0.5 1x1 2x0.5 2x1
A
i
r
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
A
i
r
V
e
l
o
c
i
t
y
(
m
/
s
)
Air velocity (m/s) and air temperature (C) generated by 5 air well
geometry sizes on 4pm at 16 May 2012
Bedroom 2 Air Velocity (m/s) Air Well Air Velocity (m/s)
Bedroom 2 Air Temperature (C) Air Well Air Temperature (C)
Outdoor Air Temperature
Existing Air Well Size
CFD simulation Air Well Size
0.5 x 0.5m
1 x 0.5m
1 x 1m
2 x 0.5m
2 x 1m (original
size of air well)
Table 3: CFD slices show the air flow pattern (colour arrow) and air
temperature (filled colour slices) of the modified air well with existing room
4.0 Conclusion
The purpose of the study is to shows the CFD as the prediction tool for
thermal performance in building industry. The thermal performance is first verified
through the field measurement in order to understand the thermal condition of the
existing terrace house. The next step would be validation of the CFD software in
order to make sure the viability of the software for research task. The last step is to
find out the appropriate geometries of the air well size which suit the existing room
size to improve the ventilation of the room.
From the results of the CFD, although the configurations of the modified air
well have the gap to achieve the thermal comfort range in the tropics, which is 28 to
32C under the condition with 80 to 90% humidity and 1m/s air velocity, however the
basic configuration of air well shaft which effectively promote the air flow and shed
the solar radiation has been investigated. The rectangular geometry with size
2.0x1.0m is the appropriate size compared to the uniform size air well. Further
exploration on the length of the air well shaft and the material to improve the stack
ventilation in building especially in hot and humid condition is important. In
conclusion, CFD simulation software is a useful tool that save up times, cost and
man power that enable research to be done in sustainable way.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Institute Sultan Iskandar of Urban Habitat & Highrise
for the financial support and assistance from research grant.
Reference
BANGALEE, M. Z. I., MIAU, J. J. & LIN, S. Y. 2013. Computational techniques and a numerical study of
a buoyancy-driven ventilation system. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 65,
572-583.
BERARDI, U. 2013. Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building.
Sustainable Cities and Society, 8, 72-78.
DESIGNBUILDER 2012. An Inter-program Analysis of Computational Fluid Dynamics Based on
PHOENICS and DesignBuilder Software. Newcastle: Northumbria University.
DESIGNBUILDER. 2013. Energyplus [Online]. U.S. Department of Energy. Available:
http://www.designbuilder.co.uk/content/view/29/44/ [Accessed 28 November 2013 2013].
EPA, U. S. E. P. A. 2011. What is sustainability? What is EPA doing? How can I help? [Online]. United
State: EPA. Available: http://www.epa.gov/sustainability/basicinfo.htm [Accessed 14
November 2013 2013].
EVOLA, G. & POPOV, V. 2006. Computational analysis of wind driven natural ventilation in buildings.
Energy and Buildings, 38, 491-501.
GIVONI.B. 1998. Climate considerations in building and urban design, New York, John Wiley &
Sons,INC.
HUMPHREYS, M. A., NICOL, J. F. & RAJA, I. A. 2011. Field Studies of Indoor Thermal Comfort and the
Progress of the Adaptive Approach. Advances in Building Energy Research, 1.:1, 55-88.
JIRU.E.T & BITSUAMLAK.G.T 2010. Application of CFD in Modelling Wind-Induced Natural Ventilation
of Buildings - A review. The International Journal of Ventilation, 9.
MALAYSIA 2000. General Report of the Population and Housing Census. Malaysia: Department of
Statistics Malaysia.
MALAYSIA 2003. National Energy Balance 2003. Malaysia: Ministry of Energy, Water and
Communication.
MALAYSIA 2010. Population Distribution by Local Authority Areas and Mukims. Malaysia:
Department of Statistics, Malaysia.
MOHAMMAD BAHARVAND, MOHD HAMDAN BIN AHMAD, TABASSOM SAFIKHANI & MAJID, R. B. A.
2013. DesignBuilder Verification and Validation for Indoor Natural Ventilation. J.Basic Appl.
Sci Res, 3, 182-189.
NIKPOUR, M., KANDAR, M. Z. & MOSAVI, E. 2013. Investigating Daylight Quality Using Self-Shading
Strategy in Energy Commission Building in Malaysia. Indoor and Built Environment, 22, 822-
835.
NUGROHO, A. M. 2007. Solar Chimney Geometry for Stack Ventilation in Malaysia Terrace House.
PhD Open Access, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
OXFORD 2011. Off the Peninsula. In: MALAYSIA, O. B. G. (ed.) The Report: Malaysia 2011. Kuala
Lumpur: Oxford Business Group Malaysia.
PREZ-LOMBARD L, O. J., POUT C. 2008. A review on buildings energy consumption information.
Energy and Buildings 40, 394-398.
R. SAIDUR, M. HASANUZZAMAN , S. YOGESWARAN, H.A. MOHAMMED & HOSSAIN, M. S. 2010. An
end-use energy analysis in a Malaysian public hospital. Energy 35, 4780-4785.
TETSU KUBOTA, SANGWOO JEONG, DORIS HOOI CHYEE TOE & OSSEN, D. R. 2011. Energy
Consumption and Air Conditioning Usage in Residential Buildings of Malaysia. Journal of
International Development and Cooperation, 17, 61-69.
ZHAI, Z. 2006. Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Building Design: Aspects and Trends.
Indoor and Built Environment, 15, 305-313.