Presentation By, Ravindra Thube (10ME61R17), Under the guidance of, Dr. Surjya K. Pal, Department of Mechanical Engineering , Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. Background Literature Review Methodology Results and discussion Conclusions Contents
Aluminum: Due to light weight & high strength to weight ratio the consumption has increased in automobile, shipbuilding & aerospace industries
The unique combination of light weight and relatively high strength makes aluminum the second most popular metal that is used in industry Typical Applications of Aluminum Alloy http://www.dlr.de/wf/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-2132/2294_read-3738/
5 5xxx Series Aluminum Alloys (AA 5083)
5xxx alloys are strengthened with magnesium addition from 4- 5.5 % Non Heat treatable & work hardened alloy Excellent toughness, weldability and corrosion resistance even at salt water Representative alloys: 5052, 5083 and 5754 Typical ultimate tensile strength range: 125 to 350 MPa
Text book of Friction Stir welding & Processing by: R.S.Mishra & M.W. Mahoney Defects like porosity, slag inclusion, solidification cracks etc. which deteriorate the weld quality Melting of the material causes loss of alloying elements Distortion of workpiece Environmentally hazardous, requires shielding gas Requires additional process Difficulties in welding of AA5083 by conventional welding
6 Friction Stir Welding
(b) (a)) (c) (d) (a) Principle of FSW [13] (b) Showing AS & RS [14] (c) Keyhole [12] (d) Actual FSW [15]
7 Advantages of FSW Over Fusion Welding Retain near-parent metal properties across the weld Join similar and dissimilar materials The weld quality is excellent Because no melting of materials it avoids the weaknesses caused by distortion and metallurgical reactions No consumables (filler material, shielding gases) Improved safety absence of toxic fumes & absence of spatter of molten material Easily automated on simple milling machines Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 8 Author
Year Contribution
Peel et al. 2003 Found that the weld properties were dominated by the thermal input rather than mechanical deformation by the tool for AA5083, 3 mm plate thickness. Fujii et al. 2005 Studied the effect of tool shape on mechanical properties and microstructure and found that for 5083-0, 5mm plate thickness whose deformation resistance is relatively high, weldability is significantly affected by the rotation speed. Hirata et al. 2006 Found that the hardness of stir zone increased with decrease in friction heat flow because the grain size in stir zone decrease with friction heat flow for AA5083. Elangovan et al. 2007 Studied the influence of tool pin profile and welding speed on formation of FSW zone in AA2219 aluminum alloy of 6 mm plate thickness and found that square pin profiled tool produces mechanically sound welds. Literature Review Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 9 Author
Year Contribution
Han et al. 2009 Weld fracture were observed at the stir zone and optimum FSW conditions are weld speed of 124 mm/min and rotational speed of 800 rpm. Rajkumar et al.
2010 Studied the influence of FSW process and tool parameters on strength properties of AA7075-T6 of 5 mm plate thickness and found that joint fabricated at 1400 rpm, 60 mm/min weld speed, 8kN axial force, 15 mm shoulder diameter, 5 mm pin diameter showed higher strength properties with threaded tool. Kumar et al. 2011 Results show that tool rotational speed, welding speed and tool shoulder diameter are most significant parameters affecting axial force and heat input. Leitao et al. 2012 Studied the high temperature plastic behaviour and its relation with weldability in FSW for AA5083 & AA6082. Literature Review
Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 10 Formation of FSW joints by using five different tools (taper cylindrical, triangular, straight cylindrical, square and cone) and different process parameters for 2.5 mm plate thickness of AA5083 aluminium alloy
Study the effect of tool pin profiles and welding parameters on the formation of Friction stir weld zone Tensile properties Hardness profile Following are the objectives of the present work : Objectives
Material Selection for FSW Chemical Composition (wt%) AA5083 [16] Fe 0.4 Si 0.4 Mn 0.4 - 0.1 Mg 4.0 4.9 Zn 0.25 Ti 0.15 Cr 0.05- 0.25 XRD Tensile yield strength 125 MPa Ultimate tensile strength 175 MPa Elongation (%) 6.668 Vickers microhardness 75 HV Melting temperature 639 C Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 13 Stainless steel 316 (SS 316)
Tool Design and Tool Material Chemical Composition (wt%) of SS 316 [16] Mn 2.00 Si 1.00 S 0.030 P 0.045 Cr 16-18 Ni 10-14 Iron Remaining Shoulder diameter (D) = 15 mm Pin length (L) = 2 mm (b) Tool Design (a) Square Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 14 Tool Pin Profiles Taper cylindrical Triangular Square Straight cylindrical Cone Swept vol. 39.269 39.269 39.269 39.269 39.269 Area in static cond.
Area in dynamic cond.
(a) Taper cylindrical (b) Triangular (c) Square (d) Straight cylindrical (e) Cone Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 15 Experiments Process parameters Values Rotational speed (rpm) 900, 1400, 1800 Welding speed (mm/min) 16 D/d ratio of tool 3.75 Pin length (mm) 2 Tool shoulder diameter, D (mm) 15 Pin diameter, d (mm) 5 Plunge depth (mm) 0.1 mm No of tools = 5 No. of rotational speeds = 3 No. of welding speed = 1
Total weld = 5 x 3 = 15 Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 16 Measurement of Power Input (e) LabVIEW Display (d) Data Acquisition Card (a) Power Supply (b) Power Sensor (c) FSW Machine Power data recording frequency is 1 sample per second Output in KW Power consumption w.r.t. time was measured
(f) Power Sensor Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 17 Measurement of Temperature (c) LabVIEW Display (b) Data Acquisition Card (a) FSW Machine Temperature data recording frequency is 1 sample per second Output in millivolts (1 mv= 1 0 C) Temperature w.r.t. time were measured
(d) Handheld infrared thermometer mounted over tripod Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR FSW Setup (e) HIT (f) LabVIEW Display (d) Data Acquisition Card (a) Power Supply (b) Power Sensor (c) FSW Machine 19 Standard specimens (a) To evaluate the tensile properties of the base metals and welded joints
The standard tensile properties: 0.2% yield strength (YS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS),% elongation, % joint efficiency, fracture location
Vickers micro hardness testing- hardness variation of the metals in the friction stir weld zone (FSW), thermo mechanically affected zone (TMAZ), heat affected zones(HAZ) and the base metals
50 gmf ; 15s dwell time
Metallographic Observations
Vickers micro hardness testing apparatus Etched sample LEICA stereo zoom microscope with Qwin-V3 display (a) (b) Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 21 RESULTS & DISCUSSION Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 22 Surface temperature of Weld Nugget Zone
(a) = plunging & dwelling
(b) = Actual welding
(c) = Pulling the tool out Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR a 23 Discussions 1) As rpm increases power consumption increases irrespective of tool pin profile 2) % increase in power consumption is more from 900 to 1400 than 1400 to 1800 rpm Power Input (a) = plunging & dwelling
(b) = Actual welding
(c) = Pulling the tool out (a) (c) (b) Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 24 Surface Appearance of Welded Samples Flash at retreating side Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR Flash defect occurs at retreating side for all four pin profile tools at 1800 rpm except straight cylindrical pin profile tool 25 Fracture locations in tensile tested welded specimens (a) (b) Effect of Pin Profile & rpm on Tensile Properties Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 26 Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR Effect of Pin Profile & rpm on Tensile Properties 27 Effect of Pin Profile & rpm on FSW Zone 900 rpm 1400 rpm 1800 rpm Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 28 Effect of Weld Speed on Tensile Properties
Rotational speed 1400 rpm Welding speed (mm/min) 16, 20, 25 & 31.5 No. of joints formed 8 (2 x 4) Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 29 Effect of Weld Speed on Tensile Properties
Square pin tool As weld speed increases UTS decreases for square pin profiled tool
Square pin tool 20 mm/min 25 mm/min Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 32 Hardness Profile Straight cylindrical 1400 rpm & 16 mm/min 50 gmf, 15 sec. Microhardness varying from 54-71 VH Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 H a r d n e s s
( H V )
Lateral distance from weld line (mm) 33
For AA5083 whose deformation resistance is relatively high, tool pin profiled designs had little effect on heat input and power consumption but considerable effect is observed on tensile properties
As rotational speed increases surface temperature of nugget zone and power consumption increases but % increase in both form 900 to 1400 rpm is more than % increase from 1400 to 1800 rpm irrespective of tool pin profiled
Joints fabricated at rotational speed of 1400 rpm and weld speed of 16 mm/min exhibited superior tensile strength properties and produces defect free FSW zone irrespective of tool pin profile except triangular pin tool
Weldability is significantly affected by the rotational speed. At high 1800 rpm straight cylindrical tool is the best; at rotational speed 1400 rpm straight cylindrical and square tool are the best; while for 900 rpm triangular and square tool are the best
Maximum strength properties of 105 MPa yield strength, 149 MPa of tensile strength and 84.9 % of joint efficiency respectively was attained without any defect for the joint fabricated using straight cylindrical tool at rotational speed of 1400 rpm and weld speed of 16 mm/min
Conclusions Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT KHARAGPUR 35 Acknowledgements I acknowledge my sincere thanks to my project guide, Dr. Surjya K. Pal, for his kind permission to pursue project work under his supervision and the technical staff at the Department of Metallurgical & Materials Engineering, Central Research Facility (CRF), Steel Technology Centre (STC),Central Workshop & Instruments Service Section (CWISS) for their unalloyed co-operation while working in their various laboratories and workshops.
[1] European Aluminum Association, Aluminum in Commercial Vehicles, Brussels Rev.1. April 2011. Chapter II Aluminum in Transport, p.7-13, Chapter V Typical Alloys for Commercial Vehicles, 2011. p. 449.
[2] G. Raynaud, P. Gomiero, The Potential of 5383 Alloy in Marine Applications. Proceedings of Alumitech97 - Transportation, Sponsored by Aluminum Association, Inc., May 20-23, Atlanta; 1997; 1997. p. 35366.
[3] A. Duran, R. Dif, New Alloy Development at Pechiney: a New Generation of 5383. In: Wilson PA, Hearn GE, editors. Conf. Proc. FAST 2001, vol. 3. Southampton: Southampton University; 2001. p. 22330.
[4] C. Leitao, R. Louro, D. Rodrigues, Analysis of high temperature plastic behaviour and its relation with weldability in friction stir welding for aluminium alloys AA5083-H111 and AA6082-T6, Journals of Materials and Design 37 (2012) 402409.
[5] C. Zhou, X. Yang, G. Luan, Fatigue properties of friction stir welds in Al 5083 alloy, Scripta Materialia 53 (2005) 11871191.
[6] H. Fujii, L. Cui, M. Maeda, K. Nogi, Effect of tool shape on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum alloys, Materials Science and Engineering A 419 (2006) 2531.
[7] H. Lombard, D. Hattingh , A. Steuwer, M. James, Optimising FSW process parameters to minimise defects and maximise fatigue life in 5083-H321 aluminium alloy, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 75 (2008) 341354.
[8] R. Kumar, K. Singh, S. Pandey, Process forces and heat input as function of process parameters in AA5083 friction stir welds, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 22(2012) 288298.
[9] M. Han, S. Lee, J. Park, S. Ko, Y. Woo, S. Kim; Optimum condition by mechanical characteristic evaluation in friction stir welding for 5083-O Al alloy, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 19(2009) s17-s22.
[10] S. Rajakumar, C. Muralidharan, V. Balasubramanian; Influence of friction stir welding process and tool parameters on strength properties of AA7075-T6 aluminium alloy joints, Materials and Design 32 (2011) 535549.
[11] K. Elangovana, V. Balasubramanianb; Influences of tool pin profile and welding speed on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA2219 aluminium alloy, Journal of materials processing technology 200 (2008) 163175.
[12] R. Mishra, Z. Ma, Friction stir welding and processing, Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, Volume 50, Issues 1-2, 31 August 2005, Pages 1-78.