Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Selected DD For Critique
Selected DD For Critique
Contribution to Theory
This dissertation contributes to theory in two different forms. First, I
contribute to the concept of dynamic capabilities. Although accepted
as important, the framework has been subject to various points of
critique. Different scholars (e.g., Henderson and Cockburn 1994; Foss
1999; Williamson 1999; Priem and Butler 2001) argue that the
framework is tautological, non-operational, theoretically vague, and
lacks empirical grounding (Eisenhardt and Martin 2000; Barney 2001;
Blum 2004). Although many scholars refer to the concept for
empirical research, most of them use it rather to establish the context
than to underpin the concept directly. However, some empirical work
(e.g., Henderson and Cockburn 1994; Makadok 1999) constitutes very
concrete tests of the framework (Barney 2001).
In this dissertation, I operationalise the concept of dynamic
capabilities to apply it to the growth processes of entrepreneurial
firms. First, I identify the different capabilities that are required in a
start-up company and thus address the criticism that the concept is
non-operational. In addition, I contribute to the theory by describing
the evolution of dynamic capabilities in entrepreneurial ventures.
Finally, I enrich the strategic management framework by providing
empirical grounding through the multi-method, multi-case field
research described in the previous chapter.
The second major contribution to theory focuses on the field of
entrepreneurship research. By applying the concept of dynamic
capabilities, I develop a framework that allows the tracking of the
growth processes of technology-based new ventures over time. I
identify differences in the growth processes of start-up companies
and link these characteristics to performance.
Contribution to Practice
Summary:
Theory
What Why How
Practice
Contributions to theory
Contributions to methodology
Contributions to practitioners
Theory
Methodology
What Why How
Practice
Intended contributions
With the purpose of the research clarified, I now turn to the specific
intended ontributions of my work. As for any academic research
study, there should be a number of contributions made to the salient
literature. In addition, for research within Business Administration, it
is also important to have implications for practitioners; this provides
some benefit to the managers who take their time to participate in
the research, but also implies that there are lessons learned that can
increase the performance of firms.
Contribution to theory
Contribution to practice
Abstract
A widely held belief is that resource constraints and industry conditions can threaten the
performance of entrepreneurial ventures. While previous research links resources to different
performance outcomes, no research has explored the performance implications of resource use,
especially for new ventures. Building from resource-based theory and contingency theory, we
examine indirect (through capability formation/use) effects that occur within the ‘black box’
between resources and performance for a sample of entrepreneurial firms undertaking an IPO.
Further, we extend theory in an entrepreneurial context to explain how underlying routines
allow resources to be managed for greater value across different industries—conditions that
make resources valuable in some contexts and not in others.
Expected Contribution.
By
ALEXANDER McKELVIE
Jonkoping International Business School, 2007
Executive Summary
Innovation is an important means of competition and growth for new
firms, especially in industries where customer demands and
technology are fast changing. Surprisingly, little is known about how
new firms acquire and use knowledge in the pursuit of innovation.
Previous research has prioritised large, established firms, and
therefore overlooked many central issues for new firms, such as their
willingness to grow. In addition, the methods employed in previous
research (e.g. case studies or proxy measures for key concepts) do
not truly capture the in-depth behaviours underlying how firms
acquire, assimilate, transform, and exploit their knowledge. This
dissertation attempts to fill these research gaps by examining the role
of knowledge and growth willingness on innovation using a
longitudinal study of over 300 new firms in the Swedish TIME sector
(Telecom, IT, Media, and Entertainment). The results indicate that the
innovation of new firms is largely explained by the firms’ knowledge-
based capabilities and growth willingness. The detailed empirical
findings also help to open up the “black box” relationships among
different capabilities and types of knowledge (e.g. market and
technological) in order to understand how these factors work together
to increase innovation. Furthermore, the results show that growth
willingness and the technological dynamism of the industry work as
causal factors in the deployment of capabilities. This has implications
as to intentionality in the development of capabilities and absorptive
capacity in new firms. In sum, this dissertation provides novel insights
into the value creation activities of new firms and to research
concerning knowledge, capabilities, absorptive capacity and
Entrepreneurship.
Intended Contribution