The Accountability Watch Committee (AWC) released a press statement regarding transitional justice in Nepal. The AWC criticized the Nepalese government for repeatedly passing laws that promote impunity instead of establishing transitional justice mechanisms to address human rights abuses during the conflict as committed to since 2006. The AWC rejected the recent law passed on May 4th that established commissions on disappearances and truth/reconciliation as going against Supreme Court directives and international standards. The AWC called on legal practitioners, media, and civil society to continue fighting for a just and open society, and urged the international community not to accept or cooperate with the newly established commissions due to the flawed law that was passed.
The Accountability Watch Committee (AWC) released a press statement regarding transitional justice in Nepal. The AWC criticized the Nepalese government for repeatedly passing laws that promote impunity instead of establishing transitional justice mechanisms to address human rights abuses during the conflict as committed to since 2006. The AWC rejected the recent law passed on May 4th that established commissions on disappearances and truth/reconciliation as going against Supreme Court directives and international standards. The AWC called on legal practitioners, media, and civil society to continue fighting for a just and open society, and urged the international community not to accept or cooperate with the newly established commissions due to the flawed law that was passed.
The Accountability Watch Committee (AWC) released a press statement regarding transitional justice in Nepal. The AWC criticized the Nepalese government for repeatedly passing laws that promote impunity instead of establishing transitional justice mechanisms to address human rights abuses during the conflict as committed to since 2006. The AWC rejected the recent law passed on May 4th that established commissions on disappearances and truth/reconciliation as going against Supreme Court directives and international standards. The AWC called on legal practitioners, media, and civil society to continue fighting for a just and open society, and urged the international community not to accept or cooperate with the newly established commissions due to the flawed law that was passed.
Even though since 2006 the political parties have repeatedly committed themselves to establishing transitional justice mechanisms to deal with conflict era cases, they have been showing a singular lack of in sincerity. Each and every government since 2008 has brought forward bills and ordinances in Parliament that promote impunity and allow perpetrators of human rights abuse to go scott free. The organisations representing the victims of conflict as well as the human rights community and concerned lawyers have been continuously battling these attempts to institutionalise impunity in the country. For this, it has been necessary to repeatedly seek recourse in the courts, and to appeal to the international community and related organisations. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court mandamus of 2 January 2014 has given clear directives to the government regarding the establishment of the transitional justice mechanisms and the content of the related legislation. The rights community, victims organisation and the international community have been urging the executive branch to remain within the boundaries set by the Supreme Court when writing the enabling legislation.
Unfortunately, on 4 May 2014 the Act on the Commission on Disappearances and the Commission on Truth and Reconciliation was adopted in defiance of the Supreme Court directives and the objections of the National Human Rights Community, the organisations of conflict era victims, the national human rights community, as well as the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva. The Accountability Watch Committee (AWC), representing the community of legal practitioners, human rights activists and conflict era victims, in January 2014 rejected the transitional justice law as contravening the letter and spirit of the Interim Constitution. The AWC members declared their unwillingness to cooperate with the Commissions established under the flawed legislation, and not to participate in its work in any way.
Even as the new constitution of the Federal Republic of Nepal is being drafted in the Constituent Assembly, the political leadership of the country has deliberately taken to enacting laws that are directly opposed to court directives, the spirit of the Interim Constitution, established democratic values, and the country's international commitments. The law adopted on 4 May on disappearances and truth/reconciliation is an additional and example of this dangerous trend. The AWC regards the recently introduced act on contempt of court as well as the proposed act on non-governmental organisatoin as further attempts to constrict open democratic society.
Under the deteriorating conditions of human rights, rule of law, impunity, accountablity and democratic values, the AWC appeals for solidarity and cooperation among the legal practitioners, media professionals and civil society who have been relentlessly fighting for a just and open society. The AWC calls upon the international community, including United Nations, donor community and human rights organisations, not to accept nor to cooperate with the proposed commissions on disappearances and on truth/reconcialiation, given that that are sought to be established under legislation that goes against the values of human rights and minimum of standards of international practice. We urge all not to maintain parallel standards when it comes to human rights, justice and democracy.
Working Together To Prosecute Human Rights Criminals: An Insider Account of The Relationship Between Human Rights Organizations and The International Criminal Tribunal For Rwanda