This document discusses material resource planning techniques. It describes ABC analysis, which categorizes inventory items into A, B, and C classes based on their annual consumption value. Class A items account for the majority of consumption value but are a small percentage of total items, while class C items are the opposite. The document states that ABC analysis allows managers to focus control efforts on the most important class A items, helping to reduce inventory levels and costs. Material requirements planning (MRP) is also discussed as a technique to determine component requirements and scheduling to avoid missing parts based on a bill of materials and master production schedule.
This document discusses material resource planning techniques. It describes ABC analysis, which categorizes inventory items into A, B, and C classes based on their annual consumption value. Class A items account for the majority of consumption value but are a small percentage of total items, while class C items are the opposite. The document states that ABC analysis allows managers to focus control efforts on the most important class A items, helping to reduce inventory levels and costs. Material requirements planning (MRP) is also discussed as a technique to determine component requirements and scheduling to avoid missing parts based on a bill of materials and master production schedule.
This document discusses material resource planning techniques. It describes ABC analysis, which categorizes inventory items into A, B, and C classes based on their annual consumption value. Class A items account for the majority of consumption value but are a small percentage of total items, while class C items are the opposite. The document states that ABC analysis allows managers to focus control efforts on the most important class A items, helping to reduce inventory levels and costs. Material requirements planning (MRP) is also discussed as a technique to determine component requirements and scheduling to avoid missing parts based on a bill of materials and master production schedule.
IMPORTANCE The quintessence of any Managers job is planning and control. Hence the materials planning and budgeting function is given a prominent place in the integrated materials management set-up. This is so because, planning for materials and working out a realistic budget not only help motivate people but also serve as a control device. Planning is done at all levels of the organization. This is illustrated in Exhibit 6.1
EXHIBIT 6.1
In the context of materials management, planning has to be done for highly programmed decisions such as import policy, foreign exchange availability and credit squeeze. In a similar manner, planning has also to be done for highly programmed decisions such as hypothecating inventory for working capital, working out delivery schedules, etc. The relationship between materials planning and other major functions are shown in Exhibit 6.2
EXHIBIT 6.2
Material Requirements Planning Material requirements planning (MRP) is the system used to avoid missing parts. It establishes a schedule (priority plan) showing the components required at each level of the assembly and, based on lead times, calculates the time when these Top Management Middle Management Planning for non- programmed decisions Planning for programmed decisions (routine) Sales Forecast Production Programme Materials Plan Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 2 components will be needed. This chapter will describe bills of material (the major building block of material requirements planning), detail the MRP process, and explain how the material requirements plan is used. But first, some details about the environment in which MRP operates. Nature of Demand There are two types of demand: independent and dependent. Independent demand is not related to the demand for any other product. For example, if a company makes wooden tables, the demand for the tables is independent. Master production schedule items are independent demand items. The demand for the sides, ends, legs, and tops depends on the demand for the tables, and these are dependent demand items. Figure 6.1 is a product tree that shows the relationship between independent and dependent demand items. The figures in parentheses show the required quantities of each component. Figure 6.1
Since independent demand is not related to the demand for any other assem- blies or products, it must be forecast. However, since dependent demand is directly re- lated to the demand for higher-level assemblies or products, it can be calculated. Material requirements planning is designed to do this calculation. An item can have both a dependent and an independent demand. A service or replacement part has both. The manufacturer of vacuum cleaners uses flexible hose in Table Legs (4) Ends (2) Sides (2) Top (1) Hardware Kit (1) Independent Demand (Forecast) Dependent Demand (Calculated) Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 3 the assembly of the units. In the assembly of the vacuums, the hose is a dependent demand item. However, the hose has a nasty habit of breaking, and the manufacturer must have replacement hoses available. Demand for replacement hoses is independent since demand for them does not depend directly upon the number of vacuums manufactured. Dependency can be horizontal or vertical. The dependency of a component on its parent is vertical. However, components also depend on each other (horizontal de- pendency). If one component is going to be a week late then the final assembly is a week late. The other components are not needed until later. This is also a dependency, and is called horizontal dependency. Planners are concerned with horizontal depen- dency when a part is delayed or there is a shortage, for then other parts will have to be rescheduled. Objectives of MRP Material requirements planning has two major objectives: determine requirements and keep priorities current. Determine requirements. The main objective of any manufacturing planning and control system is to have the right materials in the right quantities available at the right time to meet the demand for the firm's products. The material requirements plan's objective is to determine what components are needed to meet the master production schedule and, based on lead time, to calculate the periods when the components must be available. It must determine the following: o What to order. o How much to order. o When to order. o When to schedule delivery. Keep priorities current. The demand for, and supply of, components change daily. Customers enter or change orders. Components get used up, suppliers are late with delivery, scrap occurs, orders are completed, and machines break down. In this ever- changing world, a material requirements plan must be able to reorganize priorities to Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 4 keep plans current. It must be able to add and delete, expedite, delay, and change orders. Linkages to Other MPC Functions The master production schedule drives the~material requirements plan. The MRP is a priority plan for the components needed to make the products in the MPS. The plan is valid only if capacity is available when needed to make the components, and the plan must be checked against available capacity. The process of doing so is called capacity requirements planning and is discussed in the next chapter. Material requirements planning drives, or is input to, production activity control (PAC) and purchasing. MRP plans the release and receipt dates for orders. PAC and purchasing must plan and control the performance of the orders to meet the due dates.
Figure 6.2 shows a diagram of the production planning and control system with its inputs and outputs. Figure 6.2
PRODUCTION PLAN MASTER PRODUCTION SCHEDULE MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS PLAN INPUT OUTPUT Business Plan Financial Plan Market Plan Capacity
Production Plan Forecasts Customer Orders Inventory Capacity
MPS Bill of Materials Inventory Capacity Aggregate Plan o By product groups o Inventory levels
Detailed Plan o By Week o By End Item
Time-Phased Manufacturing and Purchase Orders o For Raw Materials o For Components PURCHASING PRODUCTION ACTIVITY CONTROL Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 5 Techniques of Material Resource Planning ABC Analysis WHAT IS ABC ANALYSIS? ABC Analysis is a basic analytical management tool, which enables top management to place the effort where the results will be greatest. This technique, popularly known as Always Better Control or the alphabetical approach, has universal applications in many areas of human endeavour. The technique tries to analyse the distribution of any characteristic by money value of importance in order to determine its priority. In materials management, this technique has been applied in areas needing selective control, such as inventory, criticality of items, obsolete stocks, and purchase orders, receipt of materials, inspection, store keeping, and verification of bills. The annual consumption analysis of any organisation would indicate that a handful of top high value items-less than 10 per cent of the total number-will account for a substantial portion of about 75 per cent of the total consumption value, and these few vital items are called 'A' items which need careful attention of the materials manager. Similarly, a large number of 'bottom' items-over 70 per cent of the total number called the trivial many-account only for about 10 per cent of the consumption value, and are known as the 'c' class. The items that lie between the top and bottom are called the 'B' category items. ADVANTAGES OF ABC ANALYSIS This approach helps the materials manager to exercise selective control and focus his attention only on a few items when he is confronted with lakhs of stores items. By concentrating on 'A' class items, the materials manager is able to control inventories and show 'visible' results in a short span of time. Controlling the A items and doing a proper inventory analysis automatically pinpoint obsolete stocks. Many organisations have claimed that ABC analysis has helped in reducing the clerical costs and resulted in better planning and improved inventory turnover. ABC analysis has to be resorted to because equal attention to 'A', 'B' and 'C' items will not be worthwhile Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 6 and would be very expensive. Concentrating on all the items is likely to have a diffused effect on all the items, irrespective of the priorities. MECHANICS OF ABC ANALYSIS The mechanics of classifying the items into 'A, 'B' and 'C' categories are described in the following steps: 1. Calculate rupee annual issues for each item in inventory by multiplying the unit cost by the number of units issued in a year. It is assumed that the issues and consumption are the same. 2. Sort all items by rupee annual issues in descending sequence. 3. Prepare a list from these ranked items showing item no., unit cost, annual units issued and annual rupee value of units issued. 4. Starting at the top of the list, compute a running total, item-by-item issue value and the rupee consumption value. 5. Compute and print for each item the cumulative percentages for the item count and cumulative annual issue value. The normal items in most organisations show the following pattern: 5 per cent to 10 per cent of the top number of items account for about 70 per cent of the total consumption value. These items are called 'N items. 15 per cent to 20 per cent of the number of items account for 20 per cent of the total consumption value. These items are called 'B' items. The remaining number of items account for the balance 15 per cent of the total issue value. These items are called 'C' items.
Instead of doing ABC analysis, as discussed earlier, many firms classify items as accounting for consumption value of above Rs. 10,000, 'B' items between Rs 1,000 and Rs 10,000 and 'c' items less than Rs 1,000 of annual consumption. These limits vary depending upon the size of the firm: The basic principles in ABC analysis are: i. The analysis does not depend upon the unit cost of the items but only on its annual consumption value; ii. It does not depend on the importance of the item; and Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 7 iii. The limits for ABC categorisation are not uniform but will depend upon the size of the undertaking, its inventory as well as the number of items controlled. PURPOSE OF ABC ANALYSIS The object of carrying out ABC analysis is to develop policy guidelines for selective control. Normally, once ABC analysis has been done, the following broad policy guidelines can be established in respect of each category: A-items: B-items: C-items: High consumption value Moderate value Low consumption value 1. Very strict control Moderate control Loose control 2. No safety stocks (or very low) Low safety stocks High safety stocks 3. Frequent ordering or weekly deliveries Once in three months Bulk ordering once in 6 months 4. Weekly control statements Monthly control reports Quarterly control reports 5. Maximum follow-up and expediting Periodic follow-up Follow-up and expediting in exceptional cases 6. Rigorous value analysis Moderate value analysis Minimum value analysis 7. As many sources as possible for each item Two or more reliable sources Two reliable sources for each item 8. Accurate forecasts in materials planning Estimates based on past data on present plans Rough estimates for planning 9. Minimisation of waste, obsolete and surplus (review every 15 days) Quarterly control over surplus and obsolete items Annual review over surplus and obsolete material 10. Individual postings Small group postings Group postings 11. Central purchasing and storage Combination purchasing Decentralised purchasing 12. Maximum efforts to reduce lead time Moderate Minimum clerical efforts 13. Must be handled by senior officers Can be handled by middle management Can be fully delegated Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 8 Colour coding can be used to identify A, Band C categories in stores. Usually red is used for 'A' items, pink for 'B' items and blue for 'c' items. 'A' items merit a tightly controlled inventory system with constant attention by the purchase and stores management. A large effort per item on only a few items can cost only moderately, but the effort can result in large savings. 'B'items merit a formalised inventory system with periodic attention by the purchase and stores management. 'C' items use a simpler system designed to cause the least trouble for the purchase and stores department, perhaps even at the cost of a little extra inventory cost. It is also common to further subdivide 'A' items as Al and A2 or A +and A-and similarly categories for 'B' and 'C' items exist for exercising finer control. OBJECTIVE OF ABC ANALYSIS As discussed earlier, the ABC analysis enables the materials manager to exercise selective control when he is confronted with a large number of items. Tighter and accurate procedures are essential for 'A' value items relating to materials planning, forecasts, ordering, review, records, postings, revisions, lead time analysis, safety stock, materials consumption control, purchase budget, delivery schedule, value analysis, follow-up, clerical efforts, physical stock verification, receipts, issues, stores accounting and inspection. The degree of control should be rigorous for 'A' items and should be minimum for 'C' items. ABC analysis is also helpful to rationalise the number of orders and reduce the overall inventory. For instance, let us consider three items accounting for a consumption of Rs 60,000, Rs. 4,000 and Rs 1,000 respectively, each being ordered four times a year. The following pattern would then emerge:
EXHIBIT 6.3
Item no. Annual consumption value (Rs) Number of orders Value per order Average inventory 1 60,000 4 15,000 7,500 2 4,000 4 1,000 500 3 1,000 4 250 125 Total inventory Rs 8,125 Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 9 If A, B, C analysis has been done, then it implies that 'A' item should be ordered more, say eight orders, three for 'B' and one for 'C' item. Then the pattern given in Exhibit 6.4 emerges.
EXHIBIT 6.4
Item no. Annual consumption value (Rs) Number of orders Value per order Average inventory 1 60,000 8 7,500 3,750 2 4,000 3 1,333 667 3 1,000 1 1,000 500 Total inventory Rs 4,917
It is thus noted that even though the total number of .orders is the same, the average inventory has been reduced significantly by recognising that 'A' items should be 'ordered more frequently. (The optimum number of orders can be arrived at by formulae discussed under Inventory Systems.) LIMITATIONS OF ABC ANALYSIS ABC analysis, in order to be fully effective, should be carried out with standardisation and codification. ABC analysis is based on grading the items according to the importance of performance of an item, that is by V.E.D.-vital, essential and desirable analysis discussed later. Some items, though negligible in monetary value, may be vital for running the plant, and constant attention is needed. If the inventory position is analysed according to the value, commonly known as XYZ analysis, then results of ABC and XYZ analysis will be different, depending upon the nature of obsolete items. The results of ABC analysis have to be reviewed periodically and updated. It is a common experience that a 'C' item, like diesel oil in a firm, will become the most high value item during power crisis. However, ABC analysis is a powerful approach in the direction of cost reduction as it helps to control items with a selective approach.
Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 10 Order Quantities INTRODUCTION The objectives of inventory management are to provide the required level of customer service and to reduce the sum of all costs involved. To achieve these objectives, two basic questions must be answered: 1. How much should be ordered at one time? 2. When should an order be placed? Management must establish decision rules to answer these questions so inven- tory management personnel know when to order and how much. Lacking any better knowledge, decision rules are often made based on what seems reasonable. Unfortunately, such rules do not always produce the best results. First, we must decide what we are ordering and controlling. Stock-Keeping Unit (SKU) Control is exercised through individual items in a particular inventory. These are called a stock-keeping unit (SKU). Two white shirts in the same inventory but of different sizes or styles would be two different SKUs. The same shirt in two different inventories would be two different SKUs. Lot-Size Decision Rules The eighth edition of the APICS Dictionary defines a lot, or batch, as a quantity produced together and sharing the same production costs and specifications. Following are some common decision rules for determining what lot size to order at one time. Lot-for-Lot. The Lot-for-Lot rule says to order exactly what is needed-no more-no less. The order quantity changes whenever requirements change. This technique re- quires time-phased information such as provided by a material requirements plan or a master production schedule. Since items are ordered only when needed, this system creates no unused lot-size inventory. Because of this, it is the best method for planning "A" items and is also used in a just-in-time environment. Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 11 Fixed-order quantity. Fixed-order quantity rules specify the number of units to be ordered each time an order is placed for an individual item or SKU. The quantity is usually arbitrary, such as 200 units at a time. The advantage to this type of rule is that it is easily understood. The disadvantage is that it does not minimize the costs involved. A variation on the fixed-order quantity system is the min-max system. In this system, an order is placed when the quantity available falls below the order point (dis- cussed in the next chapter). The quantity ordered is the difference between the actual quantity available at the time of order and the maximum. For example, if the order point is 100 units, the maximum is 300 units, and the quantity actually available when the order is placed is 75, the order quantity is 225 units. If the quantity actually avail- able is 80 units, an order for 220 units is placed. One commonly used method of calculating the quantity to order is the eco- nomic-order quantity, which is discussed in the next section. Order "n" periods supply. Rather than ordering a fixed quantity, inventory man- agement can order enough to satisfy future demand for a given period of time. The question is how many periods should be covered? The answer is given later in this chapter in the discussion on the period-order quantity system. Costs As shown in the last chapter, the cost of ordering and the cost of carrying inventory both depend on the quantity ordered. Ideally, the ordering decision rules used will minimize the sum of these two costs. The best known system is the economic-order quantity. ECONOMIC-ORDER QUANTITY (EOQ) Assumptions The assumptions on which the EOQ is based are as follows: Demand is relatively constant and is known. The item is produced or purchased in lots or batches and not continuously. Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 12 Order preparation costs and inventory-carrying costs are constant and known. Replacement occurs all at once. These assumptions are usually valid for finished goods whose demand is inde- pendent and fairly uniform. However, there are many situations where the assump- tions are not valid and the EOQ concept is of no use. For instance, there is no reason to calculate the EOQ for made-to-order items in which the customer specifies the order quantity, the shelf life of the product is short, or the length of the run is limited by tool life or raw material batch size. In material requirements planning, the lot-for-- lot decision rule is often used, but there are also several rules used that are variations of the economic-order quantity. Development of the EOQ Formula Under the assumptions given, the quantity of an item in inventory decreases at a uniform rate. Suppose for a particular item, the order quantity is 200 units, and the usage rate is 100 units a week, the quantity of units in inventory then increases instantaneously by Q, the quantity ordered. This is an accurate representation of the arrival of purchased parts or manufactured parts where all parts are received at once. From the preceding,
Average lot size inventory = Order quantity = 200 = 100 units 2 2
Number of orders per year = annual demand = 100 x 52 = 26 times per year order quantity 200
Relevant Costs. The relevant costs are as follows: Annual cost of placing orders. Annual cost of carrying inventory. As the order quantity increases, the average inventory and the annual cost of carrying inventory increase, but the number of orders per year and the ordering cost decrease. It is a bit like a seesaw where one cost can be reduced only at the expense of increasing the other. The trick is to find the particular order quantity in which the Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 13 total cost of carrying inventory and the cost of ordering will be a minimum. Let: A =annual usage in units S =ordering cost in dollars per order I =annual carrying cost rate as a decimal of a percentage C =unit cost in dollars Q =order quantity in units Then: Annual ordering cost =number of orders x costs per order = A X S Q Annual carrying cost =average inventory x cost of carrying one unit for one year =average inventory x unit cost x carrying cost = Q X c X i 2 Total annual costs =annual ordering costs +annual carrying costs = A X S + Q X c X i Q 2 Economic-Order Quantity Formula EOQ occurs at an order quantity in which the ordering costs equal the carrying costs. If these two costs are equal, the following formula can be derived: Carrying costs =ordering costs
Qic = AS 2 Q Solving for Q gives
Q 2 = 2AS ic
Q = 2AS ic Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 14 Practical Considerations When Using the EOQ Lumpy demand. The EOQ assumes that demand is uniform and replenishment occurs all at once. When this is not true, the EOQ will not produce the best results. It is better to use the period-order quantity. Anticipation Inventory: Demand is not uniform, and stock must be built ahead. It is better to plan a buildup of inventory based on capacity and future demand. Minimum order. Some suppliers require a minimum order. This minimum may be based on the total order rather than on individual items. Often these are C items where the rule is to order plenty, not an EOQ. Transportation inventory. As will be discussed in Chapter 13, carriers give rates based on the amount shipped. A full load costs less per ton to ship than a part load. This is similar to the price break given by suppliers for large quantities. The same type of analysis can be used. Multiples. Sometimes, order size is constrained by package size. For example, a supplier may ship only in skid-load lots. In these cases, the unit used should be the minimum package size.
IT & MATERIAL RESOURCE PLANNING This is the first activity in materials management. The important input here is the sales forecast. The sales forecast is converted into finished goods forecast, and the bill of materials is used for exploding the requirements of finished goods into the requirements of materials. The bill of materials is a document containing a detailed list of all raw materials, components and sub-assemblies needed for manufacturing a particular final product. It will be very exhaustive and will carry part numbers, store locations, whether they are to be purchased or manufactured, and so on. When the forecast of finished product A for a month is 1,000 units, the bill of materials for A can be used to arrive at the forecast of the requirements of various Notes 6 Session 6 Participant Notes- Inventory Management & Audit 15 parts and components which go into the manufacture of A. Bill of materials data is sometimes kept in punched cards. As the bill of materials is formed from the engineering drawings, any changes can be effected by replacing invalid cards with new cards. However, when the number of parts that go into each finished product becomes large (say 10,000 items or more as could be the case with Automobiles), then the punched cards could become unwieldy. Hence, many computer systems operate by storing the bill of materials internally in the machine. Also, in computerized materials planning it is possible to send the exploded requirements over the future. This is done by assigning levels, which is known as product structuring. Programmes are available to assign a level. These kinds of levels actually indicate the product structure, i.e., finished product, assemblies, sub- assemblies, components and raw materials. Further, at each level a code may be assigned to the items, which indicate the earliest time that the item must be made so that it is ready for the next step. The levels and codes are the building blocks, which enable the planner to project the requirements as well as timing in a systematic manner. The lead times of various items as well as rejection rates for each part are also taken into account for timing the requirements.