In the Matter of Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554
GN Docket No.14-28
Comments by Jon Duncan Neasham, a private citizen of the United States residing in Arlington, VA
Dear Commissioners:
As public servants each of you knows that we enjoy the right to petition our government and I appreciate this opportunity to express my views as you solicit comments to craft policies for an open Internet.
In the 1990s the Internet was a clunky, esoteric mystery for most Americans who didn't understand and couldn't conceptualize the role it would play in their lives. Today it is a vital part of our everyday lives. Its little wonder a regulatory process which is often common and unnoticed has sparked such a deep and emotional interest across our country.
From the beginning, the internet and its users have flourished with Net Neutrality. Internet providers couldn't accelerate content for a price or slow or stop content that didn't pay. Unlike television or radio, users of the system could decide for themselves what they wanted to see and do on the Internet.
That has since evolved, but the general tenant and fundamental principles have remained. Your task is a difficult but critical one. In order for this to continue -- for the Internet to grow and evolve -- you have to develop a new generation of open Internet policies that ensure the Internet remains a dynamic platform without barriers for new technologies, innovation, expression, and opportunity.
I would urge you to consider these items as you craft your policies:
Protect the consumer: everyone who accesses the Internet should enjoy the same protections and abilities to access this vibrant online ecosystem. I urge you to continue to ensure an online environment that does not erect artificial barriers and to provide oversight to safeguard against commercial arrangements between online service providers and broadband Internet access providers that may adversely impact or harm competition or choice online.
Ensure there is a strong no-blocking principle: users should be able to access the information, services, and applications they wish to access -- in short, users of the system can and should decide for themselves what they want to see and do on the Internet. 2
Increase transparency for consumers to ensure an open Internet: increasing transparency on how the network operates and is managed, the costs associated, the performance and network management of broadband access services, and what traffic is filtered and prioritized is key to ensuring consumer protection and choice on an open Internet. There is a key difference between providing a faster speed for service and restricting the general equality that has existed on the Internet for expression, innovation and commerce. Transparency can give us the tools to guard against that happening.
Continue the evolution in Internet access: we need to get beyond fast lanes and slow lanes, highways and dirt roads. If we have to use analogies, let's build more lanes and more capacity. In my lifetime I have seen dial-up as a student in the 1990s give way to cable dsl, broadband and now previously unimaginable 4G wireless connections from mobile devices that place the Internet in the palm of your hand. This was all made possible because people used the Internet and it became integral into their lives.
Let's continue that, and let's continue to encourage the investment in new technologies and avenues to increase speed and transmission that we have seen develop over more than the past two decades. The market has up until now--and will continue--to demand it, and if you can put policies in place that protect the consumer and provide transparency, you can strike the appropriate balance.
Don't put the brakes on innovation: protecting the consumer, increasing transparency, and promoting the investment in improved Internet Access can all help the Internet continue to be an engine for innovation, expression, and economic growth. Since the FCC announced its intention to develop new rules for an open Internet, a schism has developed between two sides that say we must have paid prioritization or a reclassification of broadband Internet access service to continue Net Neutrality.
I suspect both arguments miss the mark and are hyperbolic since we currently do have paid prioritization and an open Internet. As I have studied the two camps, an articles from experts in the field of Internet access and network management, I have grown more concerned about the either or approach.
Further, I am concerned that reclassification could actually ignore the market forces that promote competition, innovation, and the dynamic nature of an open Internet. Would it put the brakes on new technologies and services that have allowed us to connect and share? Would it encourage foreign governments and totalitarian regimes who seek to break up or control the Internet to follow suit with heavy-handed regulations that could balkanize the Internet? These are serious questions and concerns I urge you to explore further as you develop policies for an open Internet.
3
I'd like to close again by thanking you for the diligence and thought you are putting into this undertaking, and the opportunity for ordinary citizens such as myself to offer input which you will consider. I hope you strike the right balance and succeed because there is a good deal at stake.
For myself, the Internet has meant many positive things. I found and connected with the love of my life on it more than a decade ago. And for both of us, before that and since, the open Internet allowed us to connect with the LGBT community without shame or fear as it does for many LGBTs.
Professionally I have used it to pursue every job I have ever accepted, and it has helped the work I performed excel to a higher level than would have been previously possible. It has been an invaluable tool for me educate myself, to discover, and to reach others. And to connect with the world and with the people I love and care deeply about.
I can only optimistically imagine what the future holds, and I wish you the best of luck in crafting the policies needed to achieve that optimistic future as you move forward,
Sincerely,
/s/Duncan Neasham
Jon Duncan Neasham 5500 Columbia Pike #515 Arlington, VA 22204