Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sugar Alcohol Sweeteners As Alternatives To Sugar With Special Consideration of Xylitol (2011)
Sugar Alcohol Sweeteners As Alternatives To Sugar With Special Consideration of Xylitol (2011)
Sugar Alcohol Sweeteners As Alternatives To Sugar With Special Consideration of Xylitol (2011)
E-Mail karger@karger.ch
www.karger.com
Review
Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320
DOI: 10.1159/000324534
Sugar Alcohol Sweeteners as
Alternatives to Sugar with Special
Consideration of Xylitol
KaukoK.Mkinen
Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku , Finland
ever, owing to its hexitol nature, normally has no strong ef-
fect on the mass and adhesiveness of bacterial plaque and
on the growth of mutans streptococci. A tetritol-type alditol,
erythritol, has shown potential as a non-cariogenic sugar
substitute. Combinations of xylitol and erythritol may re-
duce the incidence of caries more effectively than either al-
ditol alone. Conclusions: Partial sugar substitution with
polyols is an important dietary tool in the prevention of den-
tal caries that should be used to enhance existing fluoride-
based caries prevention programmes. The most effective
method of conveying this information to the public is
through a proper health claim for these alditols in food label-
ling. The present review summarizes clinical and biochemi-
cal aspects of the above three dietary polyols and empha-
sizes the role of sugar substitution as a potential health-pro-
moting strategy. Copyright 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
Introduction
Following the discovery of the causal relationship be-
tween sugar consumption and caries incidence, there has
been a substantial need for the promotion of sweeteners
Key Words
Sugar alcohols Polyols Erythritol Xylitol Sorbitol
Dental caries Public health Sugar substitution
Abstract
Introduction: Dental caries is a diet-associated disease
which continues to be a serious health problem in most in-
dustrialized and developing countries. Strategies to maxi-
mize caries prevention should automatically consider the
use of sugar substitutes. It is important that public health
authorities are made cognizant of the availability of new
polyol-type sugar substitutes. Review Summary: Clinical
studies have shown that xylitol, a natural, physiologic sugar
alcohol of the pentitol type, can be used as a safe and effec-
tive caries-limiting sweetener. Habitual use of xylitol-con-
taining food and oral hygiene adjuvants has been shown to
reduce the growth of dental plaque, to interfere with the
growth of caries-associated bacteria, to decrease the inci-
dence of dental caries, and to be associated with remineral-
ization of caries lesions. Numerous public regulatory bodies
have endorsed the use of xylitol as a caries-limiting agent.
Other sugar alcohols that have been successfully used as
sugar substitutes include D -glucitol (sorbitol), which, how-
Received: June 10, 2010
Accepted: December 26, 2010
Prof. Kauko K. Mkinen
Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku
Lemminkisenkatu 2
FI20520 Turku (Finland)
Tel. +358 40 5561 063, E-Mail kauko.makinen @ uusikaupunki.fi
2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
10117571/11/02040303$38.00/0
Accessible online at:
www.karger.com/mpp
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
:
1
7
5
.
1
1
1
.
9
1
.
1
8
8
-
1
1
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
4
:
4
4
:
2
9
A
M
Mkinen
Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320 304
that will assist in the reduction of dental caries. About 25
years ago, the 1986 Report of the Sugars Task Force pub-
lished by the United States Food and Drug Administra-
tion (FDA) concluded that scientific evidence supports
the conclusion that current average 90th percentile level
of sugar [of US population groups] contribute signifi-
cantly to caries experience [1] . The report by the Task
Force continued with the statement that the consump-
tion of sucrose and fermentable carbohydrates facilitates
the development of plaque, dental caries, and periodontal
disease. The US Surgeon Generals Report on Nutrition
and Health [2] in turn stated that of the 13 leading health
problems, dental disorders ranked second in direct cost.
A large number of authoritative reviews published before
and after the FDA report have essentially reached similar
conclusions.
In spite of significant advances made in its prevention,
dental caries is still alarmingly prevalent in most geo-
graphic locations, making this disease of great social,
medical and economic importance. It is therefore neces-
sary that public health policy concerning oral health al-
low the promotion and endorsement of food ingredients
which can contribute to reducing the incidence of dental
caries. Strict sugar restriction over an extended period
will most likely lead to caries reduction. Additional den-
tal benefits can be achieved if sugar is replaced with safe
and non-cariogenic substitutes in confectioneries and re-
lated food products. The strategy of sugar substitution
should thus be considered and recommended.
The objective of this review is to summarize clinical
caries trials carried out with common, simple dietary
sugar substitutes, the sugar alcohols (polyols). In man-
ufacturing and metabolic processes, these substances
can be derived from their corresponding aldose sugars.
Hence, such sugar alcohols can be called alditols. Since
the majority of those trials have been carried out with
xylitol and D -glucitol (sorbitol), the present treatise will
focus on these sweeteners. Because xylitol has received
the most attention during the past 40 years, special em-
phasis will be given to this sweetener. Xylitol is a pentitol-
type molecule with special microbiologic and physico-
chemical properties that are assumed to contribute to
caries prevention. D -Glucitol in turn is a hexitol-type
bulk sweetener, its molecular structure resembling that of
D -glucose. The purpose here is also to report on available
public endorsement practices of xylitol-associated limita-
tion of dental caries in various countries. Finally, a four-
carbon member of this homologous alditol series, eryth-
ritol, will be briefly discussed owing to its great potential
as a future sugar substitute of the sugar alcohol nature.
Erythritol has appeared in texts as meso -erythritol and
i -erythritol, meso in this case standing for optical inactiv-
ity. Normally, erythritol can be used without a prefix. The
simple ladder structure formulas of these three alditols
are shown in figure 1 . Discussion of other dietary alditols,
such as D -mannitol, galactitol, the arabitols, D -ribitol,
and disaccharide polyols, including palatinit, maltitol
and lactitol, will be presented in another context. Palati-
nit is an equimolar mixture of - D -glucopyranosyl-1,6-
sorbitol and - D -glucopyranosyl-1,6- D -mannitol, while
maltitol and lactitol can be derived from maltose and lac-
tose, respectively.
Xylitol has gained broad success in biomedical and
other applications. Therefore, it is appropriate to first
provide a concise overview of the uses of xylitol. This will
facilitate understanding the dental health-associated po-
sition, among other medical uses, of xylitol (and other
alditols). Namely, the same physicochemical, biochemi-
cal and microbiologic profiles of xylitol will rule, regard-
less of the target tissues and therapeutic strategies in-
volved. Consequently, excluding purely technochemical,
pharmaceutical, cosmetic and related applications, sev-
eral biomedical and nutritional uses and effects of xylitol
investigated during the past 40 years are shown in table1 .
The versatility of xylitol becomes immediately obvious.
Among the uses shown, dental caries will thus constitute
the focus of this review.
The present review was primarily designed for an au-
dience that includes public health authorities, medical
practitioners and other health care professionals who
need to update their knowledge on sugar alcohol-type
sugar substitutes. D -Glucitol, xylitol, and erythritol have
been promoted within the dental and food sciences fields
as safe and efficacious caries-limiting sugar substitutes
that also exert other interesting pharmacologic effects.
The Chemical Profile of Alditols
The simple alditols are crystalline substances varying
in taste from faintly sweet (galactitol) to very sweet
(erythritol and xylitol, which are almost isosweet with
sucrose). These molecules are characterized by the fol-
lowing common sugar alcohol properties:
Absence of a reducing carbonyl group. This makes the
alditol molecules chemically somewhat less reactive
than the corresponding aldoses and ketoses. Some al-
ditols thus normally avoid those chemical reactions
that make many dietary hexose-based sugars acido-
genic and cariogenic in human dental plaque.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
:
1
7
5
.
1
1
1
.
9
1
.
1
8
8
-
1
1
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
4
:
4
4
:
2
9
A
M
Sugar Alcohols and Dental Health Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320 305
The reducing power. The sugar alcohol molecules con-
tain extra hydrogen atoms that can be deposited on
other metabolites, such as coenzymes (e.g. NADP or
NAD), and other acceptors to generate chemically re-
duced products and intermediates of metabolism.
Complexation. Owing to their polyoxy structure, aldi-
tols can form complex compounds (chelate-like struc-
tures). From the point of view of tooth mineraliza-
tion, complexes with calcium ion, hereafter marked as
Ca(II), are important. These complexes are not strong
enough to contribute to tooth erosion or tooth demin-
eralization. On the contrary, the presence of alditols in
whole-mouth saliva and plaque fluid is believed to fa-
cilitate remineralization of caries lesions.
Hydrophilicity. The presence of a large number of hy-
droxyl groups makes most alditols readily soluble in
saliva. The most hydrophilic alditols, such as erythri-
tol, xylitol, and D -glucitol, can compete with water
molecules for the hydration layer of biomolecules.
These reactions can strengthen the native conforma-
tion of salivary proteins and peptides.
Free radical scavenging. Because of their polyol nature,
some alditols, such a D -mannitol, xylitol and erythri-
tol, have been investigated as potential sources of free
radical scavenging activity in biological systems.
In spite of the involvement of the above common poly-
ol properties, all alditols also exert specific selective ef-
fects on biological reactions in health and disease. It is
thus erroneous to regard all alditols as exactly identical
in their contributions to biological processes. The differ-
ences in the molecular masses ( fig.1 ) of alditols speak for
the existence of important differences also between the
biological properties of alditols.
Xylitol is a carbohydrate-like crystalline substance
naturally occurring in low amounts in virtually all plants,
micro-organisms, and animal tissues. In this alditol mol-
ecule, all five carbon atoms of the molecule bind an OH
group ( fig.2 ). The xylitol molecule contains a tridentate
ligand (H-C-OH)
3
. It is this arrangement which reacts
with various polyvalent cations and oxyacids in a most
likely reversible reaction, forming the above-mentioned
complexes or chelates. All simple alditols (pentitols and
hexitols) contain a similar arrangement, but the stability
of the complexes formed depends on the alditol and on
the chemical and biological environment. It is possible
that complexation between Ca(II) and xylitol plays a role
in tooth mineralization (i.e. reversal of dental caries). Xy-
litol is roughly as sweet as sucrose. Xylitol causes a cooling
effect in the mouth owing to the molecules negative heat
of solution; when crystalline xylitol is introduced in the
Table 1. S elected medical and nutritional uses and effects of xyli-
tol
Non- and anticariogenic sweetener. Latest comprehensive lit-
erature reviews: ref. 3, 4
Alleviation of xerostomia; generally recognized owing to saliva
stimulation
Decrease of Pseudomonas-based biofilm (with lactoferrin) [5]
Prolonging of chlorhexidine effect on S. mutans [6]
As a sweetener in diabetic diets; generally recognized [79]
Energy source in infusion therapy [7]. Extensive research and
application history in Germany
Promotion of endogenous fat mobilization and oxidation [7]
Studies as an antiulcer agent [10]
Resuscitation from diabetic coma (early Japanese and German
observations)
Prevention of adrenocortical suppression during steroid thera-
py [7]
Increase in auditory threshold values in patients with Mnires
disease [11, 12]
Therapy of adenosine deaminase deficiency in a form of adult
myopathy [13]
Therapy of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in
red blood cells (anemia) [14]
Restoration of heart muscle adenine nucleotide levels [15]
Increase in the levels of retinol-binding proteins [7]
Reduction in the incidence of liver and bile duct disorders [7];
older literature shown in ref. 16
Stimulation of the mixed-function oxidase system [17]
Treatment of ketonemia [18]
Prevention of experimental osteoporosis; improvement of
collagen and bone properties. Reviewed in ref. 19
Prevention of some diabetic complications. Rat studies of
Knuuttila, Svanberg, Mattila, and others reviewed in ref. 19
As a protein-sparing and thiamine-sparing agent; stimulation
of enteral vitamin synthesis [7, 20]
Preservation of red blood cells [21]
Amelioration of drug-induced hemolysis [22]
Prevention of acute middle ear infections in infants [2325]
Antibacterial effect on pneumococcal nasal colonization [26]
Alleviation of cystic fibrosis condition [27]
Stimulation of cytokine induction (rat bladder cell lines) [28]
Reconstitution of integral membrane transport proteins [29]
Skin care with farnesol (atopic dry skin; Staphylococcus aureus)
[30]
Prevention of cardiac arrhythmias [31]
Stimulation of pancreatic enzyme secretion [32]
Anti-tumor effect (increasing host cell metabolism) [33]
Beneficial effect on the growth of broiler chicks [34]
Prevention of phenylenediamine-induced hepatotoxicity [35]
Wound care (inhibition of wound biofilm formation) [36]
Inhibition of fish oil oxidation (fishy flavor suppression) [37]
Inhibition of food spoilage micro-organisms [38]
As a sanitizer (food safety; kitchen hygiene; with free radicals)
[39]
Removal of KL-6 mucin (around cell surface; carcinomas) [40]
Prevention of cattle ketosis; improvement of udder health [41
47]; lowering of piglet mortality [41, 48, 49] (some observa-
tions made using alditol mixtures)
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
:
1
7
5
.
1
1
1
.
9
1
.
1
8
8
-
1
1
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
4
:
4
4
:
2
9
A
M
Mkinen
Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320 306
mouth, energy is required to dissolve xylitol in saliva. The
required energy is taken from the environment, which
produces a cooling sensation. One gram of ingested xyli-
tol provides about two calories in human nutrition. Xyli-
tol has been widely used as sweetener in the diets of dia-
betic and hyperglycemic subjects.
In the oral salivary milieu, the presence of xylitol sta-
bilizes the calcium phosphate system of saliva, partly
mimicking the function of natural salivary peptides,
such as statherin and related salivary molecules, whose
functions include governing the fate of Ca(II) in saliva
and plaque fluid. Statherin is a 43-amino acid polypep-
tide which is assumed to help provide a protective and
stabilized environment for teeth. Statherin is in part re-
sponsible for the supersaturation of Ca(II) and inorganic
phosphate levels in plaque fluid (at neutrality).
From the point of view of dental caries, however, one
of the most important features of xylitol is its pentitol na-
ture, which makes it a poor substrate for cariogenic bac-
teria, especially mutans streptococci. Oral biologic stud-
ies suggest that the chemical profile of xylitol plays an
important role in several sialochemical and microbiolog-
ical processes associated with caries limitation. Several
such processes are listed in table2 .
Review of Caries Trials: Effectiveness and Safety of
Xylitol
Clinical testing of xylitol commenced at the University
of Turku, Finland, and resulted in a series of publications
collectively called the Turku Sugar Studies [62, 63] . Fig-
Xylitol
152.1
OH
OH
OH
H
H
CH
2
OH
CH
2
OH
H
D-Glucitol (sorbitol)
182.2
OH
OH
OH
OH
H
H
H
H
CH
2
OH
CH
2
OH
meso-erythritol
122.1
CH
2
OH
OH
OH
H
H
CH
2
OH
Fig. 1. Simple ladder structure formulas
of three dietary alditol molecules dis-
cussed in the present text. The molar mass
of each alditol is shown with one-decimal
accuracy (in g/mol). The differences be-
tween the molar masses are substantial
and contribute to the metabolic and phys-
iologic fate of these molecules in the hu-
man body after ingestion.
a b c
Fig. 2. The xylitol molecule (C
5
H
12
O
5
)
shown according to van der Waals con-
tours ( a ), as a zig-zag structure ( b ), and as
a three-dimensional rendering detailing
the structure of a Ca(II)-xylitol complex
( c ). It has been postulated that such com-
plexes may play a role in tooth remineral-
ization. It is well known that these com-
plexes facilitate the absorption of Ca(II).
Reproduced with permission from au-
thors previous articles [4, 19, 53, 58] .
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
:
1
7
5
.
1
1
1
.
9
1
.
1
8
8
-
1
1
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
4
:
4
4
:
2
9
A
M
Sugar Alcohols and Dental Health Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320 307
ure 3 summarizes the most important findings of these
studies. A 2-year feeding study involved relatively heavy
loading with xylitol, D -fructose, and sucrose, and a 1-year
trial involved the use of xylitol- or sucrose-sweetened
chewing gum. The results showed that substitution of xy-
litol for sugar reduced caries progression. Several other tri-
als ensued, some of which were carried out under the aus-
pices of the World Health Organization (WHO) ( table3 ).
The validating clinical trials thus continued in the Yli-
vieska studies in Finland, in the Belize studies in Central
America, and in the so-called mother-child studies in Fin-
land, Sweden and Japan. All successfully completed clini-
cal caries trials on xylitol are shown in table3 . One of the
latest trials was completed in Kuwait [81] . An example of
these caries studies is shown in figure 4 . In this case, sub-
jects used sucrose chewing gum over a period of 40 months
after which a similar xylitol-sweetened gum was used for a
period of 16 months. The high caries activity resulting
from sucrose consumption was partly curtailed by subse-
quent intense xylitol gum use. Several of the studies shown
in table3 have used chewing gum and hard caramels. The
percent differences between xylitol treatments and controls
shown in table3 were regarded by the original authors as
significant.
The trials shown in table3 indicated that substitution
of xylitol for sugar resulted in impressive caries reduction
regardless of the type of xylitol products used. As a result
of the completion of the entire confirmatory rounds of
testing after the first trials in Turku, all of the important
original claims of the dental efficacy of xylitol have been
verified by independent dental researchers in long-term
clinical trials which have been conducted under varying
and challenging conditions. These tests have resulted in
an established consensus among scientists all over the
world, including public health policymakers, suggesting
that sufficient evidence exists to conclude that positive
dental benefits result from the use of xylitol as a food
component. These clinical trials have been reviewed in
Time (months)
1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Sucrose
Fructose
Xylitol
Time (months)
C
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
D
M
F
S
2
1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
1
2
3 Sucrose
Xylitol
Fig. 3. Results from the first clinical caries trial on xylitol. The
main plot shows the cumulative development of the decayed,
missing, and filled surfaces (DMFS) index of subjects who were
given sucrose-, fructose- or xylitol-containing food over 2 years.
The average consumption level of xylitol was estimated as 67 g per
day and subject during the 2-year period. The inset shows results
from a simultaneous 1-year trial where xylitol was given in the
form of chewing gum. The results were compared with similar use
of sucrose chewing gum. The consumption level of xylitol in this
study was 6.7 g per day and subject (i.e. one tenth of the consump-
tion level of the feeding study). The negative cumulative develop-
ment indicates the involvement of remineralization (reharden-
ing) of enamel caries lesions during the intervention. All data
were adapted from Scheinin and Mkinen [62] and Scheinin et al.
[63] , which also show the statistical evaluations.
Time (months)
D
M
F
S
i
n
d
e
x
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
2
4
6
8
10
Sucrose
gum
Xylitol
gum
Fig. 4. Cumulative development of the DMFS index in initially
10-year-old subjects who received sucrose chewing gum over a
period of 40 months and subsequently xylitol chewing gum for 16
months. The mean consumption level of xylitol was up to 14 g per
day and subject during the xylitol period. The annual consump-
tion of sucrose in Belize was reported to vary between 45 and
75 kg per capita during the study years (19891993). Both study
groups consumed regular sucrose diets. The index is explained in
the legend to figure 3. The declining trend of the index after 40
months suggests involvement of remineralization (rehardening)
of enamel caries lesions, i.e. the D component of the index was
significantly affected by the change of the saliva stimulant (i.e.
sucrose vs. xylitol). Adapted from Mkinen et al. [88] , which also
shows the statistical evaluations.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
:
1
7
5
.
1
1
1
.
9
1
.
1
8
8
-
1
1
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
4
:
4
4
:
2
9
A
M
Mkinen
Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320 308
numerous contexts [e.g. 3, 4, 19 ]. Examples of animal ex-
periments with xylitol and dental caries were carried out
e.g. by Leach and Green [90] , Shyu and Hsu [91] and Ha-
venaar et al. [92] . Three major outcomes have resulted
from the studies shown in table3 : (1) long-term protec-
tion ; (2) caries prevention beyond existing preventive
measures ; (3) prevention of intrafamilial transmission of
caries (from mother to child) .
Regarding long-term protection, the Ylivieska study
( table 3 ) involved re-examination of the subjects up to
5 years following the end of the treatment period of 2
3 years ( fig.5 ). The subjects were born in 19701971 and
were thus 1819 years old at the last examination in 1989.
These examinations demonstrated that the xylitol gum
programme produced a long-term benefit, i.e. a signifi-
cant caries-preventive effect was still observable in 1989
even though habitual xylitol chewing gum use had been
discontinued several years earlier [8486] . A long-term
preventive effect was also found in one of the Belize fol-
low-up studies [89] .
Caries prevention beyond existing preventive mea-
sures was an observation based on the then-official caries
prevention strategies observed in Finland during the
1970s and 1980s. The Ylivieska studies were carried out
under controlled circumstances that included accepted
caries prevention programmes, such as use of fluoridated
toothpaste, topical fluoride application, and administra-
tion of fluoride tablets. This fluoride-based prevention
was implemented under the control and recommenda-
tions of the then-State Medical Board of Finland, in-
dicating that the overall use of fluoride did not exceed
internationally accepted limits. The studies were thus
performed on subjects with low or moderate caries prev-
alence. In spite of this, the official maximization of car-
Table 2. Chemical and biologic properties and reactions of xylitol, and their manifestations in oral biologic processes believed to be
associated with dental caries formation
1 Pentitol nature Generally non-acidogenic in dental plaque; does not support plaque growth [50, 51]
2 Complexation Forms complexes with Ca(II), acting as carrier of Ca(II), contributing to remineralization of
caries lesions. Also increases absorption of Ca(II) [4, 19]
3 Protein stabilization Mediated through strengthening of hydrophobic interactions of proteins. Stabilizes -helix and
-structures against denaturation (such as resulting from heating and loss of solubility during
drying). Provides a saliva-friendly physicochemical environment [4, 52, 53]
4 Relationship to S. mutans Decreases the growth of most strains. Affects bacterial ultrastructure, cell envelope, acid
production, and formation of extracellular, insoluble dextrans [50, 51, 54, 55]
5 Overall plaque metabolism Carbohydrate-associated metabolism decreases, nitrogen- and protein-related one increases,
i.e. decreases the cariogenicity of plaque [56]
6 Exploitation of sucrose The activity of plaque and whole-mouth saliva sucrase-invertase levels decrease resulting in
reduced glucose levels; less lactic acid is formed. The synthesis of plaque extracellular dextrans
and levans is reduced. The amount of soluble polysaccharides is increased. Plaque becomes less
adhesive [4, 19, 53, 56]
7 Base formation Plaque and whole-mouth saliva levels of ammonia and amino acids increase. The latter will
undergo deamination further increasing ammonia levels, resulting in partial neutralization of
acids formed [19, 53, 56]
8 Cell envelope of S. mutans Lipopolysaccharide levels decrease, resulting in lowered adhesivity of bacterial cells on tooth
surfaces and to each other (lowered colony formation) [54, 57]
9 Intracellular metabolism of
S. mutans
Some strains of mutans streptococci transport xylitol with the formation of intracellular xylu-
lose and/or xylitol 5-phosphate which interfere with the intracellular bacterial metabolism.
Part of the C
5
-phosphates is expelled back into the medium (futile xylitol cycle), providing
no energetic advantage [58]. Involvement of fructose phosphotransferase systems [59] and
xylitol:phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase systems [60]
10 Other oral organisms Reduction in the numbers of aciduric and acidogenic bacteria (such as lactobacilli), and yeasts,
has also been reported [61 and references therein]
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
:
1
7
5
.
1
1
1
.
9
1
.
1
8
8
-
1
1
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
4
:
4
4
:
2
9
A
M
Sugar Alcohols and Dental Health Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320 309
Table 3. Summary of human caries studies on xylitol
a
Location of the
clinical trial
Product(s) tested Duration
years
Dose
g/day
Caries reduction, comments and references
1 Finland (Turku) Full diet 2 67 >85%. Compared with sucrose diet [62, 63]. Mostly adults
2 Finland (Turku) Chewing gum 1 6.7 >82%. Compared with sugar gum. 1/10 of the above dosage
[62]. Young adults
3 Soviet Union (Kazan) Candies 2 30 Up to 73%. Compared with sucrose candies [64]
4 French Polynesia Chewing gum 3 About 20 5862%. Compared with normal diet [65]. WHO study
5 Hungary Gum, candies, dentifrice 23 1420 3745%. Compared with fluoride [66, 67]. WHO study
6 Canada Chewing gum 12 1.03.9 52% [68]. School programme
7 Finland (Ylivieska) Chewing gum 710 3057%. All subjects (no-gum as control)
b
[69]. School
programme
8 Finland (Ylivieska) Chewing gum 3 710 5984%. High-risk subjects
b
[69]. School programme
9 Costa Rica Dentifrice + NaF 3 Twice/day Up to 12.3%. 10% X in the product [70]
10 Costa Rica Dentifrice + Na
2
FPO
3
3 Twice/day Up to 10%. 10% X in the product [71]
11 Belize Chewing gum 3.3 <10.7 Up to 73%. Permanent teeth
c
[72]. School programme
12 Belize Chewing gum 2 <10.7 Up to 63%. Deciduous teeth
d
[73]. School programme
13 USA (Dayton, Ohio) Gum, pastilles 1.8 8.5 80%. Supragingival root surface caries. Mostly elderly
subjects [74]
14 Estonia Gum, pastilles 23 5 5060%. Used on school days
e
[75]. Pastille as effective as
gum. School programme
15 Finland Chewing gum (used by
mothers)
ca. 1.75 6 70% (in children). NaF and CH as control [76]
16 Lithuania Chewing gum 3 2.95 2136% [77]. Rectification of initial results [78]
f
17 Sweden Chewing gum (used by
mothers)
1 2 Significant or 40% (in children) [79, 80]
g
18 Kuwait Hard caramels 1.5 2.3 50%. Lkerol-type hard candies were used [81]
h
. Disabled
children
19 Finland Slow-release pacifier 1 159 mg No new dentinal lesions in infants [82]. A mixture of X,
sorbitol, and NaF was tested. The pacifier features a pocket
for the sweetened tablet
20 Finland Multiple measures About 3.4 4.6 Counselling and the use of fluoride and X products reduced
caries p < 0.001) compared with basic prevention [83]
i
C H = Chlorhexidine; X = xylitol.
a
The percent reductions of caries are in comparison with a con-
trol group that received a normal diet, sucrose products or various
fluoride treatments. Non-dietary (dentifrice) studies and a pro-
gramme on multiple preventive measures that included the use of
xylitol are also shown. The percent reductions shown were classified
as significant in the original papers referred to.
b
Long-term xylitol effects (after up to 5 years of use) have been
reported [8486]. An independent follow-up study indicated that the
total number of new restored surfaces was 4.0 per child in the xylitol
group and 9.3 in the controls during the decade after the onset of the
initial trial. Participation in the xylitol gum trial resulted in a sig-
nificant reduction in the number of first restorations and hence in
costs during the subsequent decade [87].
c
16-month use of xylitol gum following the 3.3-year use (over
about 40 months) of sucrose gum reduced caries significantly [88].
<10.7 indicates the maximum calculated, supervised use of xylitol (at
school) per day and subject.
d
Two-year use of xylitol gum protected erupting permanent teeth
against caries, i.e. long-term effects were involved [89].
e
Saliva stimulants were given only on school days (about 200 per
school year). Gums were as effective as pastilles (hard candies of the
Lkerol type; Leaf, Inc.).
f
The authors did not recognize that, in their study, xylitol gum
was the only gum that lowered the DMFS increment compared with
the no-gum group after 3 years. To still observe a significant caries-
lowering effect of xylitol with such a small dosage is quite remarkable
[78]. The faulty conclusions were rectified [78].
g
In one literature source, the authors reported an 80% reduction
between test and control. When the children were 18 months old,
the authors reported that maternal consumption of xylitol- and CH/
xylitol-containing chewing gums significantly reduced the mother-
child transmission of salivary mutans streptococci. This study actu-
ally compared a gum with high xylitol content with gums with lower
xylitol content, supplemented with either CH or NaF.
h
Xylitol hard candies were given only on school days (one piece
of candy at a time, three times a day).
i
The Lkerol Dents brand (Leaf). The products were given to the
subjects with instructions to be used according to directions (i.e.
two pieces of hard candy three times a day). The calculated maximum
consumption level of xylitol was about 4.6 g/day.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
:
1
7
5
.
1
1
1
.
9
1
.
1
8
8
-
1
1
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
4
:
4
4
:
2
9
A
M
Mkinen
Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320 310
ies prevention failed to provide maximum protection.
Introduction of xylitol gum into the programme signifi-
cantly improved the degree of prevention [69] .
Prevention of dental caries in children whose mothers
had used xylitol during a relatively short period of the in-
fants life span has been considered to underline the
transmissible and infectious nature of dental caries [76,
79, 80] . New mother-child studies, following those com-
pleted in Finland [76] , Sweden [79, 80] , and Japan [93] ,
have been initiated. Some of the trials include examina-
tion of the otitis media status of infants. Transmission
and infectivity are terms used by authors of the above
original publications.
The safety of xylitol has been thoroughly studied in
humans. The worldwide scientific literature and experi-
ences based on toxicological and nutritional studies, and
long-term consumption of xylitol for dietary and diabet-
ic purposes, support a consensus on the safety of xylitol.
The safety profile of xylitol has sometimes been com-
pared with that of D -glucitol. Numerous published re-
ports confirm the comprehensive scope of xylitol safety
data accumulated over the years. One example of a safety
study in humans was conducted in the original Turku
study [62] subjects who, during 19721974, consumed
relatively large daily quantities of xylitol (about 67 g). Sev-
eral years later, in 1978, the general health status of all
participants in the study was re-examined. In addition to
the re-examination, a subgroup of chronic xylitol users
who had consumed considerable quantities of xylitol dai-
ly since 1972, were subjected to a xylitol loading test.
These results can be summarized by stating that there
were no pathological findings observed in blood and
urine chemistry analyses, and no undesirable, long-term
side-effects were found as a result of the consumption of
large quantities of xylitol. These studies have been de-
scribed [94] and were also included in a 1986 United
States FDA-commissioned report on the safety of sugar
alcohols and lactose [95] . Following the above studies, the
WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives contended
that no additional toxicological studies were recom-
mended [96] . Other resolutions concerning the safety of
xylitol have been reviewed [97] .
The voluminous literature on the role of fluorides in
caries prevention has shown, on average, caries reduction
percentages similar to those achieved in polyol studies
(i.e. 1060%), with great variation depending on the
source of fluoride, i.e. whether naturally present in drink-
ing water and food, or added to water, salt, flour, denti-
frices and related products. In view of the present topic,
it may be more relevant to compare the effect of xylitol
and fluorides when both have been used in the same
study. Accordingly, the WHO field trials in Hungary [66,
67] and French Polynesia [65] showed that substitution of
xylitol for sugar in confectioneries resulted in more effec-
tive caries prevention than in fluoride-using control
groups, the percentage differences amounting to 3845
and 5862, respectively, in favour of xylitol. The recent
mother-child studies showed that maternal use of xylitol
gum prevented caries in infants more effectively than
topical fluoride varnish treatments [76] . It is possible that
combinations of fluorides and xylitol (or erythritol, vide
infra) will effectively prevent dental caries.
Non-Specific versus Specific Xylitol Effects
Several studies have suggested that substitution of
xylitol for sugar can lead to remineralization (reharden-
ing) of caries lesions. Remineralization and rehardening
Trial years
1982 1984 1987 1989
D
M
F
S
i
n
d
e
x
0.5
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Gum use
Control
Xylitol
Fig. 5. Long-term effect of two-year use of xylitol gum on the de-
velopment of DMFS index of young subjects initially aged 1112
years. Xylitol gum was handed out by a school nurse, but con-
sumption was not supervised by teachers. The consumption level
of xylitol was about 710 g per day and subject. Control subjects
did not receive xylitol gum. No xylitol gum was available to study
subjects after 1984. The results shown were obtained with par-
ticipating girls. Almost similar results were obtained with boys.
The purpose is to show how addition of xylitol gum to a well-ad-
ministered general preventive programme affected further devel-
opment of dental caries in a cohort with relatively well-controlled
caries. Adapted from Isokangas et al. [69, 8486] , which also show
the statistical evaluations.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
:
1
7
5
.
1
1
1
.
9
1
.
1
8
8
-
1
1
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
4
:
4
4
:
2
9
A
M
Sugar Alcohols and Dental Health Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320 311
are terms that have been employed to describe the type
of caries arrest observed in clinical xylitol programmes
and laboratory tests. Several studies suggest that xylitol
can exert specific effects on dental caries not shown by
hexitols. Authors who have negated the existence of spe-
cific xylitol-associated effects in caries reduction have
claimed that caries reduction observed after xylitol use
can be explained in terms of the following passive xylitol
effects:
Involvement of mere salivary effects, i.e. the increase
in salivation associated with consumption of sweet
items constitutes the only factor that explains the clin-
ical observations made with xylitol.
Mere partial removal of a caries-inducive agent (nota-
bly sucrose) from the diet and replacing it with an es-
sentially non-fermentable one (xylitol) explains the ob-
served caries reduction. In the presence of xylitol, the
cariogenic organisms are thus merely deprived of their
normal growth substrate. The growth of dental plaque
and the progression of caries will reduce only as a result
of partial removal of the cariogenic challenge.
The above passive xylitol effects naturally constitute
an important aspect of xylitol-associated caries preven-
tion and would even as such fully justify the promotion
of xylitol as a caries-reducing agent. The scientific review
papers and professional evaluations thus far published
have not denied this fact. Scientific literature is, however,
replete with observations that also support simultaneous
involvement of active, specific xylitol effects that operate
even in the presence of fermentable hexose-based carbo-
hydrates, i.e. in situations where a strong cariogenic chal-
lenge is present. In the Turku Sugar Studies [62, 63] , su-
crose and xylitol chewing gums differed significantly
from each other in their caries-limiting ability in a situa-
tion where the salivary involvement (i.e. the chewing ef-
fect) was regarded as similar in both study cohorts. The
Belize studies [72, 73] and preceding animal experiments
[9092] also support the idea of specific xylitol effects;
xylitol was found to prevent dental caries even in the pres-
ence of a strong cariogenic challenge and was more effec-
tive than D -glucitol.
Some of the physicochemical properties of xylitol
mentioned above elucidate the complex scientific back-
ground that is assumed to lie behind the clinical xylitol
effects reported in the literature. All dental xylitol studies
have not, however, reached positive clinical and oral bio-
logic findings. Long-term field experience has shown that
in most cases failure to demonstrating such effects can be
explained in terms of the following features of the studies
in question:
Use of caries-resistant study cohorts or cohorts with
extremely low caries experience.
Use of too small study cohorts.
Use of too low concentrations of xylitol in experimen-
tal products.
Use of too short intervention. Low caries experience
presumes longer intervention.
Use of too short or too infrequent exposure to xylitol.
Simultaneous use of other caries-limiting agents and
strategies (such as fluorides).
Use of too insensitive analytical or diagnostic proce-
dures.
Use of a single analytical procedure (such as total pro-
tein or total nitrogen determination) to assess oral bi-
ologic parameters (such as plaque growth). Gravimet-
ric, clinical (plaque index), microbiological, biochemi-
cal, and other methods should be used simultaneously.
Involvement of caries-resistant study cohorts consti-
tutes an important problem. In counties like Finland
where the popular use of xylitol chewing gums nears
100% (the market share of sugar gums may currently be
less than 1%), it will be difficult if not impossible to con-
duct clinical caries studies on xylitol; most young subjects
use xylitol habitually. If caries activity is also low, any new
preventive strategy may not easily reveal its potential.
Erythritol, whose chemical mechanism of action in caries
prevention may drastically differ from that of xylitol,
may, on the other hand, add to the efficacy of traditional
prevention in populations with an even relatively well-
controlled caries situation. It is obvious that the duration
of polyol-based interventions must be increased as well.
A recommended practice is to use 67 g of xylitol dai-
ly, preferably in 35 separate chewing/sucking episodes,
preferably after main meals and sugary snacks. Regard-
ing oral biologic measurements such as plaque growth,
plaque microbiology, and the chemical composition of
saliva and plaque, experiments lasting from a few days to
several months or even several years have been imple-
mented. Regarding dental caries outcomes, trials that last
several years are recommended. A particular dilemma
has indeed been occasioned by studies that have been
based on a single plaque assessment procedure (such as
protein determination, which can lead to erroneous con-
clusions) since consumption of xylitol seems to increase
the nitrogen- and protein-related metabolism of dental
plaque while simultaneously decreasing plaque mass, vol-
ume and adhesiveness.
In addition to chewing gum, other xylitol-containing
products have also been available. Some of them, along
with remarks concerning their possible advantages and
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
:
1
7
5
.
1
1
1
.
9
1
.
1
8
8
-
1
1
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
4
:
4
4
:
2
9
A
M
Mkinen
Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320 312
disadvantages, are shown in table 4 . Special patient
groups may benefit from the use of xylitol. Examples of
such cohorts are shown in table5 .
Synergism between Xylitol and Other Dental Health
Adjuvants
The ability of various physical and chemical agents to
enhance their effects when they are applied simultane-
ously with each other is well known. An early observation
on reduced salivary fluorine levels determined with a
fluoride-sensitive electrode in the whole-mouth saliva of
xylitol-consuming subjects and an opposite trend in the
saliva of sucrose-consuming subjects [56 ; table XI of the
paper] prompted the present author to predict, at the turn
of the 1970s and 1980s, that there might be a synergistic
effect of ionizable fluorine (fluoride) and xylitol in car-
ies limitation (published as part of commercial advertis-
ing of the then-Xyrofin AG, Bar, Switzerland). Although
this assumption met criticism, it was considered plausible
owing to the complexation between xylitol and metal cat-
ions (including calcium, see above); interaction between
xylitol and fluoride (or at least concerning their effects on
caries-inducive bacteria and reactions with hydroxyapa-
tite) was regarded as a possibility. Synergism was possible
also owing to the known affinity between Ca(II) and F
.
The fluoride ion may turn out to be ineffective under cer-
tain conditions: Hamilton and Ellwood [98] suggested
that Streptococcus mutans (strain Ingbritt) possesses at
least two glucose transport systems, one of which is rela-
tively fluoride insensitive. It would be necessary to inves-
tigate the effect of added xylitol on these transport sys-
tems.
Further indirect or partly direct indications of synergy
between the effects of anti-plaque agents and F
on enam-
el demineralization can also be found in Arends et al.
[99] , Luoma et al. [100] and Meurman [101] .
In 1992, Rogers and Bert [102] published their study
on the cells of S. mutans that were pulsed with either
D -glucose or xylitol under pH free-fall conditions. Fluo-
ride had little effect on the response of the organism to
D -glucose until the culture pH fell to about 5.0, at which
point lactic acid production was reduced about threefold.
The effect of xylitol was most marked in the presence of
fluoride, i.e. the pH did not fall below 5.0 and only 50%
of added D -glucose was utilized. The authors suggested
that xylitol augmented the metabolic effects on S. mutans
of low levels of fluoride. About 13 years later, Maehara et
al. [103] published their revealing experiments on syner-
gistic inhibition by combination of fluoride and xylitol on
glycolysis by mutans streptococci. In these studies, cells
of S. mutans NCTC10449 and S. sobrinus 6715 were test-
ed for acid production from D -glucose under anaerobic
conditions in the presence of 06.4 m M F
and/or 60 m M
xylitol. Their combination inhibited acid production
Table 4. Examples of xylitol-containing consumer products used in caries limitation
Product Remarks
1 Chewing gum Renders effective mastication; salivation increases. Limited mechanical cleansing (mild plaque-reducing
effect); simultaneous use of fluorides and other adjuvants may increase efficacy. Drawback: unused gum
constitutes a refusal
2 Pastilles, tablets,
drages
Stimulation of saliva. Suitable for patients with occlusal problems. Fully soluble (no gum refuse results).
Concerns chewable tablets in general
3 Dentifrice Simultaneous mechanical cleansing. Normally non-caloric use (infants may swallow dentifrice); facilitates
several additive effects of other ingredients such as fluorides, detergents, inorganic and organic calcium
and phosphate salts, pharmaceuticals
4 Mouthwashes,
sprays, gels,
artificial saliva
Normally non-caloric use, normally shorter treatment time. Simultaneous use of detergents, fluorides
inorganic and organic salts, pharmaceuticals is possible. Gel can be used with a custom-made mouth piece
(effective in fissures). Saliva substitutes can be used, for example, by xerostomic patients
5 Pacifier After preliminary experiments and clinical trials, now receiving more attention as a slow-release mecha-
nism of xylitol dosing in infants (using a perforated nibble or a pocket in which a xylitol tablet can be in-
serted for gradual dissolution by saliva). Simultaneous positive impact on middle ear infection control,
resulting in decreased antibiotic prescription
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
:
1
7
5
.
1
1
1
.
9
1
.
1
8
8
-
1
1
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
4
:
4
4
:
2
9
A
M
Sugar Alcohols and Dental Health Med Princ Pract 2011;20:303320 313
more effectively than F